LTE: What is it about and why do you care? Mark Madden - Regional VP, North American Utilities September 2012
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
LTE: What is it about and why do you care? Mark Madden Regional VP, North American Utilities September 2012 All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
LTE – What is it? Long-Term Evolution, often referred to as a 4G GSM/UMTS HSPA+ technology, is an open standards, wireless GSM/EDGE UMTS/HSPA+ broadband network technology GSM/EDGE L TD-SCDMA T IP-based: Can support any enterprise DO-Rev A application E DO-Rev A B/A+ High Speed: Data rates up to 326 Mb/s WIMAX Flexible: Supports both fixed and mobile All roads lead to LTE applications Long-life: Broad carrier acceptance nearly guarantees a 15+ year life span Economical: Emerging mass-market ecosystem massively reduces device cost Open Standards: Non-proprietary protocols insure competitive vendor eco- system Emerging utility standard of choice – all vendor product roadmaps lead to LTE All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
LTE compelling performances Latency Reduction •Low latency enables fast channel •65 ms adaptation therefore allowing high •60 ms speed applications •50 ms •50 ms •10 ms HSPA RevA/RevB HSPA+ WiMAX LTE HD TV User Higher Peak throughput created content Multi-screen •326 Mbps Gaming Smart Grid •173 Mbps More… •42 Mbps •36 Mbps •High peak throughput enables rich •14 Mbps •15 Mbps content applications over LTE HSPA RevB WiMAX HSPA+ LTE 20MHz LTE 20MHz 5MHz 5MHz 10MHz 5MHz MIMO2x2 MIMO4x4 All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
All technologies have an upgrade path to LTE GERAN 4G ITU GSM/EDGE Evolutions 100 Mb/s (full mobility) TD-SCDMA 1Gb/s TD-SCDMA TDMA evolution evolution-tbc (hotspot) All candidates OFDM, MIMO & W-CDMA / All IP HSPA HSPA+ LTE R8/R9 LTE R10 FDD/TDD FDD/TDD EVDO CDMA CDMA 1X Rev A/B BWA/OFDMA WiMAX 16d WiMAX 16e TDD ? WiMAX 16m TDD/FDD Deployed Arriving Next step •Evolution routes All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
LTE – What will it do for a Utility LTE promises a single long-term network and technology approach for broadband connectivity to nearly all of Consumer’s distributed field assets Avoids the duplicative costs of geographically redundant, purpose-built networks by integrating the communications of: Meter Collectors Substations Pole-mounted and remote intelligent devices Field workforce Critical Mobile Data initially Future Land Mobile Radio replacement Distributed Energy Resources Enterprise Voice and Data Video Surveillance All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
Smart Grid Applications Typical End-to-End Delay Requirements Delay Allowance Priority Application (minimum) •Capacity considerations ms 0-max may limit high rate 100-min 250 ms < Delay < 1 s video streaming AMI - priority 300 70 (surveillance) CCTV stream - normal 400 75 to on-demand in PMU (class C) 500 80 portions Some Transformer Protection and Control 500 80 of service territory Applications Enterprise data - other 500 80 1 s
Smart Grid Applications Typical End-to-End Delay Requirements Delay Allowance Priority Application (minimum) ms 0-max 100-min Delay
Individual Application Traffic* Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 3 Dense Urban Dense Urban Subarban Rural area e q. s Urban area R bp area with area without area with without c k with meter a ffi in meter meter concentrators meter meter Tr concentrators concentrators concentrators concentrators Normal 1,651 1,722 1,504 1,630 3,302 Total Critical 3,439 3,426 3,112 2,936 4,321 Traditional Normal 165 165 95 140 236 SCADA Critical 138 138 79 116 98 Synchr- Normal 221 221 221 331 993 ophasors Critical 182 182 182 272 817 Normal 826 826 826 826 1,651 CCTV Critical 1,238 1,238 1,238 1,238 2,064 Mobile WF Normal 16 16 16 16 16 (PTT - VoIP) Critical 161 161 129 81 81 Mobile WF Normal 0 0 0 0 0 (video) Critical 550 550 550 550 550 Normal 154 225 77 77 139 AMI Critical 154 140 77 77 86 New Smart Normal 32 32 32 48 64 Grid Elements Critical 27 27 27 40 54 Enterprise Normal 113 113 113 97 97 VoIP Critical 435 435 371 274 274 Enterprise Normal 124 124 124 96 105 Data Critical 554 554 459 287 296 •* Using “rough order of magnitude” computations based on worst case assumptions and simple models assuming cell average uplink (10+10) = 18Mb/s, downlink = 36Mb/s in a 3 sector cell All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
EPS QoS Parameters Per bearer (or bearer aggregate) QoS parameters: QoS Class Identifier (QCI) A scalar that is used as a reference to node-specific parameters that control packet forwarding treatment (e.g. scheduling weights, admission thresholds, queue management thresholds, link layer protocol configuration, etc.), and that have been pre-configured by the operator owning the node, e.g. eNodeB •For admission control, i.e. not used Allocation and Retention Priority (ARP) by eNodeB scheduler The primary purpose or ARP is to decide if a bearer establishment/modification request can be accepted or rejected in case of resource limitation Maximum Bit Rate (MBR) – Per GBR bearer Aggregate Maximum Bit Rate (AMBR) – Sums all non-GBR bearers per terminal/APN •e.g.VoIP using GBR •QoS 1 •SDF (service data •SDF (service data •QoS control of flow) •EPS Bearer 1 flow) individual flows is also possible via •UE •QoS 2 •e.g.ftp, http using non-GBR deep inspection e.g. to throttle rates •SDF (service data •EPS Bearer 2 •SDF (service data with no change in flow) flow) Bearer QoS •all flows get similar treatment (scheduling •Bearer level QoS parameters are always assigned by the EPC policy, queue management policy, etc.) • MME or eNB cannot modify the bearer level QoS parameter values •Traffic Filter Templates at both UE and PGW are responsible for distributing SDFs between • QoS parameter values can, however, be modified by the EPC EPS bearers All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
QoS Standardized QCI Characteristics* •Maximum •SDF priorities between PCEF and UE •2 •Conversational G •GBR •GBR •Streaming •GBR •Interactive •3 G •GBR •Background •Non-GBR •Non-GBR •Non-GBR • From: 4 classes in UMTS and CDMA To: 9 classes (QCI) in LTE •Non-GBR •Non- GBR •*Standardizing QCI characteristics ensures minimum level of QoS for mapped applications e.g. in case of roaming or with multi-vendor equipment All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
Example Utility Application Priority Characteristics Application GBR QCI ARP MBR AMBR Traditional Yes 2 High 2-20kb/s N/A SCADA Synchro- Yes 6 Med High ~300kb/s N/A Phasors CCTV No 9 Low N/A 500kb/s MWF VoIP Yes 2&3 Med High to 24kb/s PTT* High MWF Video ** No & Yes 9&2 Low to Med 256kb/s 500kb/s High AMI No 9 Low N/A 225kb/s New SGE No 6 Low N/A 100kb/s Ent. Voice Yes 3 Med 400kb/s N/A Ent. Data No 9 Med Low 500kb/s •* Multiple bearers with different priority levels dependant on bearer requirements (e.g emergency voice gets high ARP, normal PTT med ARP) ** Normal operations assumes little to no (best effort) MWF video. Critical operation raises priority, but can be rate limited. All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
Spectrum: Impact of Frequency Band Higher Frequencies Lower Range More Sites Needed 1 Site ~5.3 Sites ~11.8 Sites 700 MHz 1.8 GHz 3.5/3.65 GHz Canadian utilities using 1.8 GHz band Takes ~12 times more base stations to cover an area at 3.65 GHz compared to 700 MHz Higher Deployment Higher Frequencies and Operations Costs 12 | Field Area Network for Smart Grid | February 2010 All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
RAN Sharing with Distributed Core Architecture: Opportunity in the US to Share 700MHz with Public Safety. Canada Next? National Ops Center Regional LTE management Clock Joint Ops Center server DHCP server Regional PS Network (for eNodeB) Operator A OAM S1-MME PCRF 7450-7710- OAM 7210 HSS S1 (IPSEC) MME Aggregation IPSEC SGW Access GW & backhaul PGW 1 VLAN per CN operator ELINE or VPLS per CN operator Utility Network Capacity sharing IPSEC GW Operator B-Z per CN operator L2 connection. E.g. VLAN per SGW PGW CN operator Rate limiting per forwarding Rate limiting per class per CN operator DL CN operator DL All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
Avoiding Congestion -- Managing Capacity With Small Cells On a façade On a pole On a lamppost In a bus stop •14 All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
Radically Changing Network Architecture •Today •Tomorrow Lighter sites •15 All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
Increasing Capacity, Eliminating Congestion Hypothetical Architectural Example •Macro Cell Small Cell •12000 Talkers* •120 Talkers 78mb
LTE Network Architecture – Initial Deployments, Data Only ePC Management IP address eNB Offline management, IP address Management Charging DHCP, DNS management 5780 8650 8615 9471 DSC SDM VitalQIP VitalQIP 9453 5620 IeCCF MME (PCRF) (HSS) (for NE) (for UE) XMS SAM 7750 SR 7705 SAR-F 9412 eNodeB Ethernet Access Transport Utility Services Network 7750 SR 7750 SR SGW PGW 7750 SR (Standby) 9412 9500 MPR Others eNodeB Backhaul transport All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
LTE Network Architecture – Longer Term (with IMS, SMS, Roaming,…) Subscriber Multimedia Management Messaging Session Management IMS SMS & Telephony Future Management App Server Critical Mobile VitalQIP Voice 8950 5110 5100 (DNS/ 5020 1300 5450 ISC/ 7510 XMC SAM SMSC CMS ENUM) 5420 CTS 5900 MGC-8 MGW MRF PSTN/ PLMN IMS AAA for roaming with SS7 eHRPD 8650 5780 SDM 8615 9471 DSC (HSS/ VitalQIP VitalQIP 8950 9453 5620 AAA IeCCF MME (PCRF) HLR) (for NE) (for UE) XMS SAM LMR IO P25 and other 5140 Gateway LMR 7705 SAR-F 7750 SR BMC 9412 eNodeB Ethernet Access Transport Utlity Services Network 7750 SR 7750 SR SGW PGW 7750 SR (Standby) 9500 MPR Others Broadcast Message Ctr All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
Summary All Open Standards PTMP Roads Lead to LTE Improved Latency, Coverage and Capacity Increases the Number and Type of Applications That Can Be Supported on a Single Network Licensed Spectrum is Required 1.4MHz to 20Mhz Channels No 1800MHz Profile – yet For a converged 1800MHz network, IC will need to approve mobile applications Lower Frequencies are Better 700MHz Ideal Technology Promotes Graceful Sharing with Other Entities (e.g. Public Safety) Shared Networks Have a Lower Cost to Each Partner Small Cells Vastly Expand Capacity – Congestion can be prevented All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2011
You can also read