Liste des publications du Think Tank du PE - European Union
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Liste des publications du Think Tank du PE https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank Critères de recherche utilisés pour générer la liste : Tri Tri par date Mot-clé "Inde" 80 Résultat(s) trouvé(s) Date de création : 07-08-2022
Security and defence in the Indo-Pacific: What is at stake for the EU and its strategy? Type de publicationAnalyse approfondie Date 08-12-2021 Auteur externe •Dr Ramon PACHECO PARDO •Dr Nicola LEVERINGHAUS Domaine politique Affaires étrangères | Sécurité et défense Mot-clé ANASE | Australie | Chine | Corée du Sud | Inde | Japon | Nouvelle-Zélande | pays de l'ANASE | politique de sécurité et de défense commune | stratégie de l’UE | sécurité européenne | États-Unis Résumé The EU published its ‘Joint Communication on the EU strategy for cooperation in the Indo-Pacific’ on 16 September 2021. This Indo-Pacific Strategy lays out five crucial security issues in the region that directly affect the EU’s own security and prosperity. These are maritime security, nuclear security and non-proliferation, cyber security, trafficking, and terrorism. In order to deal with these security issues, the EU has CSDP missions and the CSDP toolbox at its disposal. In fact, the long-standing Operation Atalanta in the Western Indian Ocean is an example of how CSDP missions can protect EU security interests in the Indo-Pacific. Meanwhile, PESCO, EPF, a more robust cyber policy, or the recently established Coordinated Maritime Presences are CSDP toolbox components that can also promote security interests in the region. In addition, the EU has a set of partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region that can enhance its power projection and, consequently, strengthen its security. Through a combination of all these tools, the EU can have a security and defence presence in a region where core interests are at stake. Analyse approfondie EN EU-India trade relations: assessment and perspectives Type de publication Analyse approfondie Date 06-09-2021 Auteur externe Niclas Poitiers, Suman Bery, Sonali Chowdhry, Alicia García-Herrero Domaine politique Commerce international Mot-clé accord international | acte de commerce | Inde | investissement à l'étranger | politique commerciale | rapport agriculture-commerce | relation de l'Union européenne | relation économique Résumé Following the EU-India summit in May 2021, talks on both an EU-India trade and an investment agreement have resumed. This analysis provides background on where EU-India economic relations stand and why it is important to maintain momentum following this breakthrough, despite a somewhat unpromising domestic political environment in India. This new impetus largely reflects a transformed geopolitical landscape since the last round of EU-India talks were abandoned in 2013. The increased tension between India and China, as well as the EU’s intent to reduce its reliance on Chinese manufacturing have created the conditions for changes in policy by both parties. However, many of the issues that bedeviled the 2007-2013 negotiations remain unresolved. In this analysis, we provide an overview of EU-India trade and investment relations as well as the major topics in these negotiations. The impact of key global initiatives on climate change and WTO reform that will shape the negotiations is also briefly discussed. Based on this analysis, we discuss three potential ways forward for EU-India trade and investment negotiations: a comprehensive agreement similar to that reached between the EU and Vietnam; a limited investment deal primarily focused on manufacturing; and a reinforced status quo with trade and investment relations growing organically under the existing multilateral umbrella. Analyse approfondie EN G7 summit, June 2021: Asserting democratic values in the post-crisis context Type de publication Briefing Date 10-06-2021 Auteur ZAMFIR Ionel Domaine politique Affaires étrangères | Coronavirus Mot-clé Afrique du Sud | Australie | Corée du Sud | Groupe des pays les plus industrialisés | impôt sur les sociétés | Inde | maladie à coronavirus | rapport | réunion au sommet | Union européenne | vaccin | épidémie Résumé The 47th G7 summit is scheduled for 11-13 June 2021, and will be chaired and hosted by the United Kingdom. After a year-long break caused by the pandemic and the former US administration's inability to organise the 2020 summit at a later date than initially scheduled, this year's event is expected to mark a return to strong global cooperation among the world's major democracies. The leaders of four guest states – Australia, India, South Africa and South Korea – will join the leaders of the G7 nations and the European Union, thus reinforcing the group's global democratic representativeness. The G7 has built up a reputation for being an informal framework of cooperation on major global issues, which is driven by a shared commitment to the fundamental values of liberal democracy. This year's summit is expected to reaffirm these values in the face of assertive authoritarian tendencies elsewhere in the world. Ahead of the summit, ministerial meetings in areas selected by the presidency have already taken place, shaping future cooperation among the G7 nations. 'Beat[ing] Covid-19 and building back better' is an obvious priority this year. Achieving it includes ensuring more equitable and rapid access to vaccines and other medical supplies for developing countries. While the group has reaffirmed its general commitment to this priority, the US proposal to waive patent rights for the production of vaccines still needs to find common ground among the G7 members. Another US initiative – setting a minimum global corporate tax rate – has already been endorsed by G7 finance ministers. It is considered a major change in the international taxation system, potentially making history for the G7. Reinforcing cooperation on the regulation of digital developments is another priority, as are ambitions linked to honouring the commitments under the Paris Agreement. As every year, the EU, which is a G7 member in its own right, will be represented by the Presidents of the European Council and of the European Commission. This is an updated version of a Briefing published ahead of the Parliament's debate on 9 June 2021. Briefing EN 07-08-2022 Source : © Union européenne, 2022 - PE 1
Outcome of the meetings of EU leaders in Porto on 7-8 May 2021 Type de publicationBriefing Date 18-05-2021 Auteur ANGHEL Suzana Elena Domaine politique Affaires étrangères | Démocratie | Politique sociale | Santé publique Mot-clé accord commercial (UE) | Conseil européen | dialogue social (UE) | Inde | maladie à coronavirus | politique sociale européenne | Portugal | Portugal du Nord | réunion au sommet | épidémie Résumé On 8 May 2021, EU Heads of State or Government met in Porto for an informal European Council, preceded on 7 May by a social summit, organised by the Portuguese Presidency. The informal European Council was followed by an EU–India leaders' meeting, attended remotely by the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi. At their informal meeting, EU leaders discussed social policy and, without formally endorsing the Commission action plan, adopted the Porto Declaration, welcoming 'the new EU headline targets on jobs, skills and poverty reduction' for 2030. They also assessed the EU Covid-19 situation, focusing on vaccine production and delivery, the future EU digital green certificate, and international solidarity in the fight against the pandemic. They also prepared for the EU–India leaders' meeting, agreeing to resume talks on a free trade agreement (FTA) and start negotiations on a stand-alone investment protection agreement, and on an agreement on geographical indications that, depending on the pace of negotiations, could either stand alone or be built into the FTA. Briefing EN India: Economic indicators and trade with EU Type de publication En bref Date 22-04-2021 Auteur SABBATI Giulio Domaine politique Affaires étrangères | Commerce international Mot-clé Inde | indicateur économique | instrument financier de l'UE | politique commerciale commune | statistique commerciale | statistique économique | échange commercial Résumé At the beginning of the century, the EU and India were growing exactly at the same path: how about today? Who is the main trade partner of India: China or the EU? And would you ever think that the EU exports to India pearls and precious stones more than optical instruments? And how much is it easy to do business in New Delhi? Find the answers to these and many more questions in our EPRS publication on ‘India: Economic indicators and trade with EU’, part of a series of infographics produced in collaboration with the European University Institute's GlobalStat on the world's main economies. This is an updated edition of an ‘At a Glance’ note published in September 2019. En bref EN The Quad: An emerging multilateral security framework of democracies in the Indo-Pacific region Type de publicationBriefing Date 18-03-2021 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères Mot-clé ANASE | Australie | Chine | géopolitique | Inde | Japon | océan Pacifique | politique étrangère et de sécurité commune | sécurité régionale | États-Unis Résumé The Indo-Pacific region houses the largest share of global GDP, the world's busiest trade routes, largest population and most powerful militaries. After having successfully worked side by side in coordinating the 2004 tsunami relief, in 2007 Australia, India, Japan and the US (the Quad, short for Quadrilateral Security Dialogue) held meetings with each other to discuss security-related issues, and their navies held a military exercise. Although the grouping ended its activities prematurely in 2008, China's growing assertiveness in the region prompted it to remain active in bilateral and trilateral cooperation on security issues. Meetings among senior officials resumed in November 2017 in Manila. In November 2020, the Quad navies held a major military exercise. The first Quad summit took place in March 2021. The grouping has emphasised that its goal is to maintain the liberal rules-based international order, which China seeks to undermine through a revisionist challenge of the status quo. Its efforts are not focused on creating institutions or military alliances, but rather, on generating gradual convergence of cooperation on multiple issues, including Covid-19, climate change, critical and emerging technologies, counterterrorism, cybersecurity and disaster recovery. Establishing further cooperation with other like-minded countries in the region and co-existing with ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) are among the Quad's future challenges. The EU is not a traditional security player in the Indo-Pacific; however, as the region is particularly relevant to its trade, it has a strong interest in avoiding disruption of the sea lanes. The Indo-Pacific could be an area of cooperation with the new US administration. France, Germany and the Netherlands have published strategies or guidelines for the Indo-Pacific region, which has stepped up expectations about the forthcoming strategy for the region by the EU as a whole. Briefing EN 07-08-2022 Source : © Union européenne, 2022 - PE 2
Recalls of sesame seed products due to pesticide residues Type de publicationEn bref Date 03-02-2021 Auteur LAANINEN Tarja Domaine politique Sécurité des aliments Mot-clé importation (UE) | Inde | protection du consommateur | retrait du marché | risque sanitaire | résidu de pesticide | substance cancérigène | surveillance à l'importation | sécurité des aliments | sésame Résumé In September 2020, Belgium initiated a notification in the EU Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) concerning residues of an unauthorised substance called ethylene oxide (EO) in various lots of sesame seeds from India. This triggered a chain of enforced testing and controls, leading to withdrawals and recalls of significant amounts of products in many EU Member States, including products such as hummus, bread, and sauces containing sesame. Both conventional and organic products are concerned. A possible explanation according to scientists could be that ethylene oxide has been used for fumigating sesame seeds, to eradicate contamination with salmonella. En bref EN EU-India: Cooperation on climate Type de publicationBriefing Date 17-11-2020 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères Mot-clé changement climatique | coopération environnementale | gaz à effet de serre | Inde | politique de l'environnement de l'UE | politique intérieure | qualité de l’air | réduction des émissions de gaz | réunion au sommet | urbanisme | économie verte | énergie renouvelable Résumé The EU and India are respectively the third and the fourth largest emitters of atmosphere-warming greenhouse gases. Meanwhile, India's per-capita emissions are much lower than those of other major economies. India is acutely affected by climate change and is strongly dependent on coal as a source of primary energy. Nevertheless, it is now a leader in the promotion of renewable energy and has fixed ambitious targets in terms of electricity-generation capacity from renewables. Along these lines, Delhi is a major promoter of the International Solar Alliance and, alongside other partners, the founder of the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure. The EU and India have assumed a leading role in fighting climate change and have been increasingly cooperating with each other in this field, at both public- and private-sector levels. They have agreed partnerships on sectoral issues such as clean energy, water and urban development. The EU is supporting several Indian projects on climate action, sustainability and clean energy. At their 15th summit, held in July 2020, the EU and India placed a strong focus on climate change and reaffirmed their commitment to cooperate for the implementation of the Paris Agreement and to engage constructively in its first global stocktaking in 2023. Briefing EN EU-India: Trade prospects Type de publicationEn bref Date 12-10-2020 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères Mot-clé accord commercial (UE) | accord de libre-échange | accord tarifaire | capitaux étrangers | commerce international | Inde | investissement étranger | négociation d'accord (UE) | politique commerciale commune | préférences généralisées Résumé The EU-India Summit held in July 2020 agreed to establish a regular high-level dialogue at ministerial level on bilateral trade and investment relations. In this way, the EU and India expressed a clear political will to work together to overcome issues that have hampered their trade relations in recent years and impeded advances towards a bilateral trade and investment agreement – where negotiations have been stalled since 2013 – and achievement of the potential of economic relations between the world's two biggest democracies. En bref EN EU-India: Cooperation on digitalisation Type de publicationEn bref Date 12-10-2020 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères Mot-clé accord de coopération (UE) | changement technologique | croissance économique | Inde | Internet | marché unique numérique | nouvelle technologie | réseau de transmission | sécurité des systèmes d’information | technologie de l'information Résumé A 'human-centric digitalisation to develop inclusive economies and societies' is the main concept behind the digital transformation of both the EU and India. During their July 2020 summit, the two agreed to promote global digitalisation standards characterised by 'safe and ethical deployment'. Their flagship initiatives – the EU digital single market and 'Digital India' – make them natural partners in the promotion of these global standards. Yet, if their ICT cooperation is to make sound progress, some of Delhi's protectionist policies need further consideration. En bref EN 07-08-2022 Source : © Union européenne, 2022 - PE 3
European Council Leaders' Agenda 2020-21 Type de publicationEn bref Date 05-10-2020 Auteur DRACHENBERG Ralf Domaine politique Démocratie Mot-clé Balkans occidentaux | changement technologique | Chine | Conseil européen | fonctionnement institutionnel | géopolitique | Inde | politique étrangère et de sécurité commune | Russie | réunion au sommet | Union africaine | économie verte Résumé At the special European Council meeting of 1-2 October 2020, Charles Michel, President of the European Council, presented a new Leaders’ Agenda outlining his view of ‘the key challenges confronting the Union’ and setting a timetable for the Heads of State or Government to address these issues at meetings between October 2020 and June 2021. The new Leaders’ Agenda puts strong focus on the ‘green transition and digital transformation’, as well as on ‘Europe’s role in the world’, two core priorities in the EU Strategic Agenda 2019-24. Mr Michel intends to structure the approach to external relations discussions, notably through a series of strategic debates on relations with key partners. A number of EU priority topics are however missing, notably migration, the rule of law and the Conference on the Future of Europe. Mr Michel has, however, stated that the Leaders’ Agenda is a flexible tool, which can be updated as circumstances require. En bref EN Assessing the potential impact of an EU-India trade agreement Type de publication Étude Date 01-07-2020 Auteur NAVARRA Cecilia Domaine politique Droit international public | Valeur ajoutée européenne Mot-clé accord commercial (UE) | Inde | rapport de recherche | étude d'impact Résumé The EU and India are major actors in the international arena and the discussions over a possible Free Trade Agreement has been ongoing for several years. This study analyses the potential effects of an FTA between EU and India in a "Cost of Non Europe" perspective. The results of a quantitative simulation of a potential FTA in goods and services indicate that welfare gains from increased trade for both sides may be between € 8 billion and € 8.5 billion (0.03 % increase with respect to the baseline for the EU and about 0.3 % for India). Furthermore, a qualitative analysis suggests that potential gains may appear from a coordinated EU action in addressing possible side effects, distributive impacts and externalities (such as inequalities, labour market effects, poverty and development implications, environmental issues) and from increased coordination in the provision of global public goods. By considering these aspects, the Cost of Non-Europe in the field may be larger. Étude EN Challenges facing India's democracy and economy Type de publication Briefing Date 13-05-2020 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères | Coronavirus Mot-clé démocratie | Inde | laïcité | récession économique | élection nationale Résumé India has a 70-year history of democracy, tolerance and rule of law, and a successful record of managing its patchwork of cultures and religions. In recent months, however, following the second consecutive victory of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party in the May 2019 general elections, this situation has been changing under the impact of an ever-increasing Hindu nationalist grip on society and politics. After Jammu and Kashmir, India's only Muslim-majority state, lost its autonomy, the government adopted the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), allowing foreigners from six religious communities living in three neighbouring countries to apply for Indian citizenship at a faster pace. This new legislation has prompted protests and divisions across India, as, according to both internal and external observers, citizenship would be determined along religious criteria, which risks undermining the country's traditional secularism. The government's plan to launch a national register of citizens has further increased the Muslim community's fear of discrimination. Communal tensions flared into violence in late February 2020 in Delhi, claiming 53 lives. At the same time, India's economy is experiencing a severe downturn: even before the coronavirus outbreak started to have an effect, its growth was slackening and so was job creation, while at the same time unemployment is high, consumer confidence and spending are low, and trust in the banking sector is eroding as credit weakness and non-performing loans hinder its performance. Contrary to expectations, the Union budget for financial year 2021 has not tackled existing structural weaknesses or generated a large fiscal stimulus as an answer to the slowdown. Briefing EN 07-08-2022 Source : © Union européenne, 2022 - PE 4
India's Parliament and other political institutions Type de publication Briefing Date 11-03-2020 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères Mot-clé démocratie | gouvernement | Inde | parlement national | république Résumé India is the biggest democracy in the world. With a population of 1.35 billion in 2018, India was also the world's second most populous country, and is projected to overtake China by 2027. Like the European Union (EU), it is a pluralistic, multi-faith, multilingual (with 22 recognised languages), and multi-ethnic country. Secularism has been enshrined in the Constitution. India's 1950 Constitution provides for a quasi-federal setup: powers are separated between the central union and the 28 state governments. Competences are allocated according to administrative level, between the Union, states or 'concurrently'. The prime minister possesses the country's effective executive power. As 'Leader of the House' in the lower chamber, the prime minister also holds decisive power in deciding the House's agenda. However, the real power of initiating legislation belongs to the government, and the Parliament has no say on foreign affairs. India's Parliament is bicameral: it includes the Lok Sabha – the lower house – and the Rajya Sabha – the upper house. The two houses are equal, but the Lok Sabha dominates in deciding certain financial matters and on the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers. General elections take place for Lok Sabha members every five years. The last elections took place in May 2019, when Narendra Modi was re-elected as Prime Minister. The Rajva Sabha is a permanent body consisting of members indirectly elected by the states, and it is not subject to dissolution. India has a common law legal system. The Supreme Court is the final court of appeal, headed by the Chief Justice of India. It arbitrates on any dispute between the Union and the states, as well as between states, and on the enforcement of fundamental rights. It has powers of judicial review over legislation adopted by both the Union and the states. Briefing EN India-administered Kashmir: current situation Type de publication En bref Date 13-09-2019 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères Mot-clé autonomie | Inde | question du Cachemire Résumé On 5 and 6 August 2019, the Indian Parliament approved the withdrawal of Article 370 of the Constitution, which had guaranteed Jammu and Kashmir, India's only Muslim-majority state, a high degree of autonomy. It also decided to split Jammu and Kashmir into two territories, both administered directly from Delhi. Meanwhile, the government deployed 46 000 troops, arrested regional political leaders and thousands of activists, suspended internet and communications across the valley, and shut down schools and colleges. En bref EN India: environmental issues Type de publicationBriefing Date 10-04-2019 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères | Environnement Mot-clé changement climatique | déboisement | développement durable | gestion des déchets | Inde | pauvreté | pollution de l'eau | qualité de l’air | urbanisation | énergie renouvelable Résumé The entire south Asian region is threatened by climate change. Changes in average weather conditions are likely to create hotspots across the region and have negative impacts on living standards and gross domestic product (GDP). India is at the core of this trend: it ranks 14th in the last United Nations global climate risk index and in 2017 it was the second most-affected country in terms of casualties related to extreme weather. Air quality in Indian cities is quickly deteriorating and it is today worse than the situation in China: in the 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) global ambient air quality database, 11 of the 12 cities with the highest levels of small particulate – PM2.5 – are located in India. Air pollution goes hand in hand with poverty: in 2016 an estimated 790 million people (almost 60 % of the Indian population), still relied on biomass for cooking. Deforestation, water pollution, clean water shortages, and waste management are further issues of concern. The Indian authorities have taken several initiatives to tackle these issues. In 2008, the first national plan on climate change (NAPCC) outlined eight 'national missions' running up to 2017. India is a leader in the implementation of the Paris Agreement on climate change. It is a founding member of the International Solar Alliance and has ambitious targets in terms of solar power energy. It has launched a national clean air programme (NCAP) to combat air pollution. Prime Minister's Narendra Modi government has launched several flagship initiatives on environment, including a clean cooking scheme, Clean India, Clean Ganga, and Smart Cities Mission. The EU supports Delhi's efforts on tackling its environment challenges. At their March 2016 summit, the EU and India agreed on two joint declarations: on an India-EU water partnership and on a clean energy and climate partnership. The joint declaration on partnership for smart and sustainable urban development signed at the India-EU Summit in October 2017 is the framework for EU support for India's urbanisation challenges. Briefing EN 07-08-2022 Source : © Union européenne, 2022 - PE 5
India: taking stock of Modi's five years Type de publicationBriefing Date 10-04-2019 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères Mot-clé corruption | droit du travail | droits de l'homme | hindouisme | Inde | liberté d'expression | politique extérieure | politique étrangère et de sécurité commune | réforme économique | travail des jeunes | élection nationale | État de droit Résumé From 11 April to 18 May 2019, 900 million Indians are invited to take part in the world's biggest democratic event: the election of the 543 members of the Lok Sabha (lower chamber). Voting will be held across the country in seven phases and the result will be declared on 23 May. In 2014 the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) obtained the absolute majority in India's Lok Sabha, and Narendra Modi became prime minister. Enjoying a strong and undisputed mandate, Modi has generated expectations of unleashing the country's economic potential and has adopted many flagship initiatives in a bid to change the country. In the last five years, India has overtaken China as the fastest growing economy, becoming the world's sixth biggest economy and a space power. Doing business in the country has become easier. Poverty has been reduced. The government succeeded in introducing major fiscal unification reform and a new law on bankruptcy. It failed, however to create the necessary stock of jobs for young people or to promote long-awaited labour reforms. The situation for farmers has worsened, and an overnight demonetisation hindered progress among small businesses and rural communities, while failing to bring real advances in the fight against corruption. State banks hold large stocks of bad loans and the government has increased pressure on the central bank and on its independence. Hindu nationalism and religious intolerance, pressure on freedom of expression, possible state intrusion into privacy, citizenship issues and other topics have been matters for concern in the area of human rights, although the country remains a robust democracy governed by the rule of law. Modi has increased the country's presence in the global arena, although the framework of India's relations with the major powers has not changed. Following two summits in 2016 and 2017, the EU and India have embarked on a road towards cooperation on non- trade issues. Trade has meanwhile stagnated and little progress has been made in negotiations on a trade and investment agreement. Briefing EN Nepal, Bhutan and their neighbours: Two Himalayan countries landlocked between India and China Type de publicationBriefing Date 05-04-2019 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères | Démocratie Mot-clé Bhoutan | Chine | démocratie | démocratisation | Inde | Népal | préférences généralisées | régime autoritaire | rôle international de l'UE Résumé Nepal and Bhutan are two poor landlocked Himalayan countries, sandwiched between a democracy and an authoritarian one-party state: India and China. After an authoritarian past, during the last decade, they have begun reforms in order to switch towards a democratic model. After a long and complicated path, Nepal succeeded in adopting a new constitution in 2015. Its first post-constitution government is run by an alliance of communist parties. In Bhutan, the king has successfully steered the country towards democratisation, as confirmed by the October 2018 general elections. While historically the two countries have nurtured solid relations with India, in recent years Beijing has expanded its footprint in the region considerably, challenging Delhi's traditional sphere of influence and increasing its sense of encirclement. In 2017 this led to a crisis referred to as the 'Doklam Plateau standoff'. There is currently a window of opportunity for Nepal and Bhutan to diversify their economic and security partnership and to rebalance their foreign policies between their two big neighbours. The EU has been supporting the two countries on their democratic journey and tripled resources for both countries' development for the 2014-2020 period. As they are among the world's poorest countries, Nepal and Bhutan benefit from the EU's 'Everything But Arms' scheme, which grants full duty free and quota free access to the EU single market for all products. Briefing EN Inequality [What Think Tanks are thinking] Type de publication Briefing Date 23-11-2018 Auteur CESLUK-GRAJEWSKI Marcin Domaine politique Affaires économiques et monétaires | Politique sociale Mot-clé Chine | club de réflexion | Inde | inégalité sociale | pauvreté | répartition du revenu | Union européenne Résumé Inequality has diminished on a global scale in the past 30 years, as more than 2 billion people have been lifted out of poverty in countries such as China or India. However, in the United States and, to a lesser extent, western Europe and other developed regions, inequality within individual countries has often increased in recent years after decades of general growth in prosperity. Many analysts attribute this phenomenon both to globalisation and to inadequate policy responses to the pace of technological change. This note brings together commentaries, analyses and studies by major international think tanks and research institutes on economic and social inequality. Reports on gender and racial inequalities will be covered in greater detail in a future edition in the series. Briefing EN 07-08-2022 Source : © Union européenne, 2022 - PE 6
India: Energy issues Type de publication En bref Date 07-09-2018 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères | Énergie Mot-clé consommation d'énergie | Inde | réduction des émissions de gaz | technologie propre Résumé India's energy consumption is set to grow faster than that of any other major economy, and the country is to overtake China as the largest-growing market for energy by the end of the 2020s. In spite of its large population, its share of global energy consumption, currently at 5 %, should grow moderately to reach 11 % in 2040. India's government plans to bring electricity to every household by the end of 2018. India's energy mix, mostly based on fossil fuels, is to evolve very slowly in the future, but renewables – especially solar power – will gain relevance. En bref EN Global Trendometer - Essays on medium- and long-term global trends - July 2018 Type de publication Étude Date 18-07-2018 Auteur CESLUK-GRAJEWSKI Marcin | NOONAN EAMONN | RECHARD Daniele | SCHMERTZING Leopold | WINDLE- WEHRLE Jessica Freya Domaine politique Affaires économiques et monétaires | Affaires étrangères | Droit démocratique, institutionnel et parlementaire de l''Union | Démocratie | Environnement | Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice | Sécurité des aliments Mot-clé Chine | contrat public | démocratie | désinformation | Inde | intelligence artificielle | main-d'œuvre | politique en matière de changement climatique | propagande politique | revenu | sécurité alimentaire | États-Unis Résumé The EU faces challenges from the outside and the inside. Most of those are the symptoms of big underlying trends, and handling them needs foresight. The Global Trendometer tries to provide foresight for decision makers in the EU by analysing the changes in these long-term trends. This publication does not offer answers or make recommendations. It presents summarised information derived from a range of carefully selected sources. This issue of the Global Trendometer analyses long-term trends on India, the labour-share of income, and democracy and artificial intelligence. It also features two-pagers on geoengineering, remittances, food security in China, economic waves, the US after Trump, public procurement and deep fakes. Étude EN Kashmir: 70 years of disputes Type de publication En bref Date 17-07-2018 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères Mot-clé Chine | droits de l'homme | guerre de frontière | Haut-commissaire aux droits de l'homme | Inde | Pakistan | question du Cachemire Résumé Kashmir, located between China, India and Pakistan, has been at the heart of a complex, 70-year dispute between Delhi and Islamabad, which has strained bilateral relations and impeded the development of stronger ties in the whole of South Asia. In the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir, an uprising against Delhi's rule has been ongoing since 1989. In June 2018, a UN human rights report on Kashmir called for establishing a commission of inquiry into multiple violations from both sides. Kashmir is a mountainous area the size of Germany, in the north-west of the Indian subcontinent, home to K2, the world's second-tallest mountain, and also narrow valleys and barren plateaus. It is also prone to seismic activity: as recently as 2005, a strong earthquake is estimated to have claimed 75 000 lives. En bref EN China [What Think Tanks are thinking] Type de publication Briefing Date 23-03-2018 Auteur CESLUK-GRAJEWSKI Marcin Domaine politique Affaires étrangères Mot-clé Balkans occidentaux | Chine | club de réflexion | commerce international | corruption | Inde | mondialisation | relation multilatérale | États-Unis Résumé The National People's Congress has recently confirmed Xi Jinping as China's President, along with several appointments of his allies to top state jobs. It has also approved amendments to China's Constitution which, in particular, abolish the limit of two five-year terms for the office of President, prompting concerns that the country is moving towards a more autocratic system. These decisions have cemented Xi's grip on power in a country that plays an increasingly important role in the global economy, as well as in security and foreign affairs. Analysts say that China's growing assertiveness poses a challenge to the United States, whose policies are becoming increasingly unpredictable, and to other international actors. This note offers links to recent commentaries, studies and reports from major international think tanks on China, its ties with the EU and related issues. More studies on the topics can be found in a previous edition of 'What Think Tanks are thinking' published in June, 2017. Briefing EN 07-08-2022 Source : © Union européenne, 2022 - PE 7
India and prospects for closer EU ties Type de publication Briefing Date 08-09-2017 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères Mot-clé accord commercial | Chine | droits de l'homme | Inde | investissement de l'UE | Pakistan | pays tiers | protection des minorités | relation bilatérale | relation multilatérale | réunion au sommet | État laïc Résumé The EU and India – two multicultural democracies with a constitutional structure containing elements of federalism – potentially have much in common. However, they face different geopolitical concerns; the fact that each party's attention is focused on its own neighbours (in the case of New Delhi, this translates into a 'Chinese obsession'), has prevented them from developing the strategic partnership they had agreed upon in 2004. The stalemate in negotiations for a free trade agreement, which started in 2007 and reached deadlock in 2013, has also hindered progress towards closer relations. In India, although the EU does not get much media coverage, it is generally viewed positively. Both the Indian leadership and the general public have a stronger perception of individual Member States than of the EU as an entity, whereas the Indian elite is more aware of the European Union. Several Indian observers regret the EU's attitude of 'preaching and finger pointing'. Even though the latest EU-India Summit held in 2016 did not succeed in making a breakthrough in the negotiations for a free trade agreement, it endorsed the EU-India Agenda for Action 2020 as a common roadmap aimed at reviving the strategic partnership between the two parties. While waiting for economic relations to develop further, the two could focus on other possible areas of cooperation such as maritime security and coordination of activities in the Middle East and Afghanistan. Briefing EN The EU-Latin American Strategic Partnership: state of play and ways forward Type de publication Étude Date 30-08-2017 Auteur externe Gustavo G. MÜLLER (Senior Researcher, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, University of Leuven, Belgium); Jan WOUTERS (Professor and Director, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, University of Leuven, Belgium); Jean-Christophe DEFRAIGNE (Professor, Institute for European Studies, University Saint-Louis Brussels, Belgium); Sebastian SANTANDER (Professor, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Liege, Belgium); Kolja RAUBE (Senior Researcher, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, University of Leuven, Belgium) Domaine politique Affaires étrangères | Commerce international | Démocratie | Développement et aide humanitaire Mot-clé Amérique latine | Caraïbes | Chine | Corée du Sud | droits de l'homme | géopolitique | Inde | intégration économique | Japon | organisation latino-américaine | politique commerciale | politique commerciale commune | politique extérieure | relation de l'Union européenne | relation interparlementaire | situation politique | situation sociale | situation économique Résumé By looking at the current social, economic and political trends in Latin America and the Caribbean and at recent developments in the EU’s relation with the region, this study explores windows of opportunity for advancing the EU- Latin American strategic partnership. It is argued that, although asymmetries between Europe and Latin America might impact and diminish the bi-regional relationship, the EU is well-positioned to play a more active role in Latin America by strengthening existing institutional links, such as the strategic bi-regional partnership between the EU and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) and the Euro-Latin America Parliamentary Assembly (EuroLat). The study concludes with tailor-made recommendations in order to advance the EU’s engagement and cooperation with individual Latin American countries and with the region as a whole, both through traditional cooperative channels and through closer parliamentary links within the framework of EuroLat. Étude ES, EN Openness of public procurement markets in key third countries Type de publication Étude Date 04-07-2017 Auteur externe Kamala DAWAR, Sussex University, United Kingdom Domaine politique Commerce international | Droit des contrats, droit commercial et droit des sociétés | Développement régional | Marché intérieur et union douanière | Évaluation du droit et des mesures politiques dans la pratique Mot-clé accès au marché | Brésil | Chine | contrat public | droit comparé | Inde | Japon | libération des échanges | marché de l'UE | politique commerciale commune | protectionnisme | restriction aux échanges | États-Unis Résumé This report assesses the openness of public procurement markets in key third countries of interest to the EU. It provides a comparative overview of the regulatory and market access characteristics of the US, Brazil, India, China, Japans’ procurement markets, with reference to the procurement regulation and enforcement within the EU. The report assesses the available data on both the de jure and de facto levels of openness of these markets to put forward some conclusions of value to policy making both within the EU and in its trading relations with key third countries. This assessment concludes that the lack of comprehensive comparable data on procurement contract awards, particularly at the sub-central level, is not a trivial challenge for policy makers. Nevertheless, it is evident that the liberalisation of procurement markets continues to take place on a strictly reciprocal basis – linked to the offensive interests of governments. Given the slow-down in negotiating mega-regional agreements with comprehensive procurement chapters, the WTO Government Procurement Agreement remains the most efficient and transparent forum for undertaking further liberalisation in public procurement. Étude EN 07-08-2022 Source : © Union européenne, 2022 - PE 8
Asie du Sud Type de publication Fiches thématiques sur l’UE Date 01-06-2017 Auteur GARCES DE LOS FAYOS TOURNAN Fernando | SAARELA Anna | SOUTULLO SANCHEZ Jorge Domaine politique Affaires étrangères Mot-clé Afghanistan | Association sud-asiatique de coopération régionale | droits de l'homme | Inde | Pakistan | politique commerciale commune | politique de coopération | politique de développement | politique étrangère et de sécurité commune | relation de l'Union européenne | situation politique | Sri Lanka Résumé L’Asie, continent le plus vaste et le plus peuplé au monde, revêt une grande importance géostratégique pour l’Union européenne. Cette dernière renforce ses liens avec l’Asie du Sud. L’Inde est désormais l’un de ses partenaires stratégiques. Des problèmes de sécurité dans la région, comme le conflit au Cachemire et l’Afghanistan, inquiètent l’Union. Celle-ci est un acteur économique de poids et un fournisseur important d’aide au développement, œuvrant au renforcement des institutions, de la démocratie, de la bonne gouvernance et des Droits de l’homme. Fiches thématiques sur BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV l’UE India and challenges ahead in the Indo-Pacific region: Opportunities for cooperation with the EU Type de publication Briefing Date 30-05-2017 Auteur D'AMBROGIO Enrico Domaine politique Affaires étrangères Mot-clé accord de libre-échange | changement climatique | Chine | Inde | négociation d'accord (UE) | océan Indien | océan Pacifique | relation bilatérale | rôle international de l'UE | sécurité des transports | transport maritime | énergie renouvelable Résumé Lying in the middle of the Indian Ocean, India relies heavily on the ocean for its energy and trade, but also faces both conventional and non-conventional security challenges which the ocean presents. At the same time, its operational theatre is widening to include a bigger geopolitical region: the Indo-Pacific, including the South China Sea. Alongside this broadening horizon, India needs to reckon with an emerging actor: China. Not only has Beijing's military presence in the Indian Ocean increased considerably, but it has been planning naval bases and civilian port infrastructure in a region in which India has traditionally enjoyed maritime prominence. China's 'string of pearls' strategy has left New Delhi feeling 'encircled'. Major efforts to modernise the Indian navy and to enhance cooperation and alliances in the region suggest that India is taking the challenge seriously. However, missing from this framework are a comprehensive maritime policy, a single body in charge of coordinating Indian maritime policies and interests, and a more developed shipbuilding sector. Besides, there is no effective agreement or mechanism for multilateral cooperation on maritime security in the Indian Ocean. Since 2008, the EU has been a successful net security provider in the western part of the Indo-Pacific region through its Operation Atalanta / EU NAVFOR Somalia anti-piracy deployment. Adopted in 2014, the EU's new maritime security strategy offers opportunities to further develop its cooperation with India on maritime issues and in particular on non-conventional security issues, in order to upgrade bilateral relations. Briefing EN EU-India Relations — Keeping up the Momentum Needed for a Vital Strategic Partnership Type de publicationAnalyse approfondie Date 06-09-2016 Auteur SAARELA Anna | VANDEWALLE Laurence Domaine politique Gouvernance mondiale Mot-clé accord de coopération (UE) | bicamérisme | chef de gouvernement | condition féminine | droits de l'homme | Inde | investissement | négociation d'accord (UE) | politique de défense | politique extérieure | question du Cachemire | relation commerciale | relation interparlementaire | réunion au sommet | situation politique | situation économique | violence sexuelle Résumé Relations between the EU and India seem to be back on track since leaders met in Brussels, on 30 March 2016, for their first summit in four years. They endorsed the EU-India Agenda for Action 2020 and their water, clean energy and climate partnerships; they welcomed the negotiations on a broad-based Bilateral Trade and Investment Agreement (BTIA) and agreed that the fact that they are currently stalled should not stand in the way of the overall development of the relationship. They set a common agenda on migration and mobility and they adopted a joint declaration on counter- terrorism. It is vital to keep up the momentum created at the summit. The strategic relationship is vital to both sides: India is Asia’s third-largest economy and the world’s fastest growing economy and the EU is India’s biggest trading partner. The EU is also the largest investor in India, with foreign direct investment stock valued at EUR 38.5 billion in 2014, and is the primary destination for Indian foreign investment. Analyse approfondie EN 07-08-2022 Source : © Union européenne, 2022 - PE 9
India and China: Too Close for Comfort? Type de publicationAnalyse approfondie Date 15-07-2016 Auteur DATTA SHALENE | LEGRAND Jérôme | MENDONCA Susana | VANDEWALLE Laurence | VIILUP Elina Domaine politique Affaires étrangères | Commerce international | Droits de l''homme | Démocratie | Développement et aide humanitaire | Environnement | Gouvernance mondiale | Sécurité et défense Mot-clé Chine | coopération militaire | coopération transfrontalière | gestion de l'eau | géopolitique | histoire contemporaine | Inde | infrastructure de transport | politique commerciale | politique de défense | politique extérieure | relation de l'Union européenne | situation économique | sécurité régionale Résumé India and China — two emerging Asian giants — have historically been polar opposites in many ways and relations between them have been tense. In recent years, however, their co-operation has been improving and they have signed numerous bilateral agreements. From the EU’s perspective, it is crucial to monitor the relationship between these strategic partners. Not only do these two emerging countries have the two largest populations in the world, but projections suggest that they will together account for a significant share of the world economy by the middle of the century. The EU must be able to meet the regional and even global challenges presented by the rise of China and India. Analyse approfondie EN One Belt, One Road (OBOR): China's regional integration initiative Type de publication Briefing Date 07-07-2016 Auteur GRIEGER Gisela Domaine politique Affaires étrangères | Commerce international Mot-clé approvisionnement énergétique | Chine | conséquence économique | contentieux territorial | géopolitique | Inde | infrastructure de transport | intégration économique | pays de l'ANASE | politique commerciale | politique d'investissement | politique des transports | politique extérieure | Russie | transport maritime | États-Unis Résumé In 2013, China launched its 'One Belt, One Road' (OBOR) initiative. OBOR is China’s broadly sketched vision of how it plans to boost regional integration in its wider neighbourhood. The initiative is unprecedented in terms of China's financial engagement and the innovative network-based project design which is intended to contribute to a more inclusive global governance. It contrasts sharply with existing treaty-based integration concepts where the geographical scope, partner countries, strategy, principles and rules were clearly defined at the outset. China's new development vision has been seen as an alternative to regional trade agreements which do not include it; as a strategy for asserting its leadership role in Asia in response to the US pivot to Asia; as an economic outreach towards Asian countries for resolving territorial and maritime disputes by exporting China’s domestic development policies; as a means of tapping into new sources of growth to check the marked downturn in its economy; as a tool for tackling the socio-economic divide between its inland and coastal provinces; and finally, as a venue for addressing security challenges on its western periphery as well as energy security issues. The response to China's regional integration vision has been mixed. While the idea of enhancing connectivity has drawn considerable interest, given the huge infrastructure gaps across Asia, scepticism regarding China's potential hegemonic ambitions has prevailed notably among regional rivals India and Japan as well as the USA. Whether OBOR will be mutually beneficial for China and the EU will depend on the two sides agreeing on the 'rules of the game', including for joint projects in third countries. Potential synergies between OBOR and the EU connectivity initiatives are being explored under the EU-China Connectivity Platform. Briefing EN Traité sur la non-prolifération des armes nucléaires (TNP): État des lieux Type de publicationAnalyse approfondie Date 11-04-2016 Auteur CIRLIG Carmen-Cristina Domaine politique Sécurité et défense Mot-clé accord START | arme nucléaire | Chine | conférence internationale | Corée du Nord | Inde | Iran | Israël | non- prolifération nucléaire | négociation internationale | Pakistan | politique de l'armement | Russie | rôle international de l'UE | utilisation pacifique d'énergie | énergie nucléaire | États-Unis Résumé Les armes nucléaires sont de retour dans la programmation stratégique des États dotés d'armes nucléaires, alors que l'inverse était espéré. Le déclin des arsenaux nucléaires au niveau mondial s'accompagne d'investissements dans des armes et vecteurs nucléaires plus modernes, ce qui éloigne les États dotés d'armes nucléaires des engagements pris à l'égard du désarmement au titre du traité sur la non-prolifération nucléaire (TNP) et remet en cause les fondements de ce traité. Les États dotés d'armes nucléaires non signataires du TNP ne sont pas liés par les principales obligations internationales en matière de non-prolifération et de désarmement et cette situation risque de miner davantage la pertinence et la crédibilité du traité. La Conférence d'examen 2015 du TNP s'est intéressée à la mise en œuvre effective par les États parties de leurs engagements au titre du TNP, ainsi qu'aux énormes défis à venir. Même si la conférence s'est terminée sans consensus sur un document final, l'adhésion croissante à l'initiative relative aux conséquences humanitaires des armes nucléaires devrait fournir aux États intéressés une marche à suivre afin de poursuivre l'objectif d'un monde sans nucléaire consacré par le TNP. Analyse approfondie DE, EN, FR 07-08-2022 Source : © Union européenne, 2022 - PE 10
You can also read