Launch Vehicle and Flight System Considerations - Interstellar ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Launch Vehicle and Flight System Considerations 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 10:30 AM – 10:50 AM, Thursday, 30 September 2021 Ralph L. McNutt, Jr. Pragmatic Interstellar Probe Mission Study Principal Investigator ralph.mcnutt@jhuapl.edu
Implementation “Requirements” for an Interstellar Probe • An interstellar Probe mission must be capable for making a ”significant” penetration into the nearby - aka (“Very Local”) – Interstellar Medium in a “reasonable” amount of time • The terms “significant” and “reasonable” have varied over the past 60 years – usually reflecting the perceived ”near-term technology horizon” of the time. • Implied speeds have ranged from 5 au/yr to ~120 au/yr to distances of 150 au to 0.1 ly (6,320 au) with travel times of ~20 to 50 years • Asymptotic escape speeds from the Sun in excess of ~10 au/yr have been – and continue to be - problematic 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 2
Implementation “Solutions” for an Interstellar Probe • All posited historic “solutions” have called for in-space, low-thrust propulsion - Required technology somewhere past the then-current (i.e., at the time of the study) state of the art (SOA) Solar Sail IKAROS 315 kg, 196 m2 Solar Oberth Maneuver (SOM) Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) 1607 g/m2 >>> 1.54 g/m2 1929 – ∆V = 5 km/s 2003 – 2005 Project Prometheus Lightsail 2 5 kg, 32 m2 Implied rp = 1.53 Rs Life Cycle Cost Estimate $21.5B RY 156 g/m2 >> 1.54 g/m2 Vescape = ~15 au/yr Requires ≤ 30 kg/kW system 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 3
Solar Oberth Maneuver (SOM) – 1 • Extended study as part of this effort • Spacecraft design that “closes” with the science trades • Advanced thermal shield material can (on paper) lower accessible perihelia to ~2 solar radii (from the CENTER) of the Sun • Option 3 – Solar Oberth maneuver (powered solar gravity assist - ~900-kg spacecraft plus ~1,600 kg thermal shield • Potentially Highest Performance Example: 2 Rs perihelion with Orion 50XL Option 1 Mass = 860 kg Option 1 Mass = 251.8 kg (P10) Asymptotic escape speed Asymptotic escape speed Vesc = 8.0498 au/yr Vesc = 8.9032 au/yr Launch ! = 108.29 " / " Launch ! = 108.29 " / " At Sun ∆ = 2.0536 / At Sun ∆ = . / Time to 400 au = 52.73 years Time to 400 au = 48.08 years BASELINE S/C – science ”PIONEER 10” S/C – science no closure longer closes w/faster speed 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 4
Solar Oberth Maneuver (SOM) – 2 • Less massive Pioneer 10 spacecraft allows for a speed increase – but only by about 12% • That spacecraft design does NOT “close” with the current science trades • Most of the thermal shield mass is associated with protecting the kick stage (Orion 50XL) ✘ • Lowering the perihelion to 1 solar radius (not possible) would only increase the speed by a factor of ~21/4 = 1.19 (~20%) ✘ • IF one could replace the solid fuel with zero boil off (ZBO) liquid hydrogen (LH2) AND replace the Orion 50XL mass with a nuclear Option 1 Mass = 251.8 kg (P10) thermal rocket (NTR) engine with a specific impulse of 900 s Asymptotic escape speed (PEWEE-1 test) THEN the flyout speed could be increased to 16.7 Vesc = 16.6898 au/yr au/yr Launch ! = 108.29 " / " • Even with ZBO LH2 this does not close – the Small Nuclear At Sun ∆ = . / Rocket Engine (SNRE) design engine is ~7 times the mass of the Time to 400 au = 27.42 years EMPTY Orion 50XL motor (which includes the propellant “tank" “Orion 50XL” Isp = 900 s 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 5
Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) ✘ • One U.S. flown reactor SNAP – 10 in April 1965; satellite failed 6,100 kg+ at 43 days; reactor scrammed and parts still in nuclear-safe 3,336 kg orbit (waste) • SNAP program: 1956 – 1973, > ~ $ 7.8 B in now-year dollars heat rejection • Need unattended / autonomous reactor operation for ~10 years segment • Major mass driver is waste heat rejection radiator system • Prometheus reactor module development cost $4.165 B ✘ • “Analysis of the critical path to launch shows the Reactor Module (and associated Power Conversion) development and testing activities as the most critical path.” -Project Prometheus Final Report Technology Horizon (2030) + Programmatics / Cost + Risk are problematic (at best) 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 6
Solar Sail – 1 • To enable rapid solar system escape need !"#$% &'%$( ($"!$)!'* +(#&&,(# -'(.# 0.234 56!" - “Lightness number” = ($/!)$)!'*$%-'(.# = ≥1 7#$$ - Release point from a sufficiently high speed – typically heliocentric radii of 20 Rs to 25 Rs have been discussed - è an additional heat shield (= mass ) is required • Sailcraft to date have been too small to provide science closure to the mission here - No engineering closure either ≪ 1 - Solar Cruiser: 1,650 m2, 90 kg spacecraft 0,924 § ~1.54 = 0.03 ≪ 1 :4,444 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 7
Solar Sail – 2 • Parker Solar Probe could come close to having the capability to carry instruments for science closure - Includes thermal shield capable of solar approach to ~ 10 Rs ✘ - 685 kg mass è =1 for a sail area of 0.44 ✘ km2 or 667 m on a side - Each of four 472-m long spars would have to carry its share of increased radiation pressure near the Sun • Materials strength issue past current SoA 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 8
Ballistic Missiles to Space: 1 – Concept to First Use • Development of space launch vehicles is an expensive, dangerous, and time-consuming undertaking • Theoretical underpinnings advanced by Tsiolkovskii in the (then) Russian Empire (1911) • Similar work undertaken by Goddard (U.S), Oberth (Germany), and Esnault-Pelterie (France) • Goddard demonstrated first liquid-fueled rocket 16 March 1926 • Development of 1st operational system (V2 Vergeltungswaffe 2) during World War II (Germany) - 6,048 built; 3,225 launched; V2 and precursor V1 estimated cost ~$40B 2015 USD - The V2 holds the record for largest number of rockets of one model built 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 9
Ballistic Missiles: 2 – Humans to Orbit and the Moon • Captured systems and personnel by U.S. Army forces and Soviet Army forces were the basis for the Space Age and the Moon Race and Ballistic Missile component of the Cold War • Largest systems development for human landings on the Moon (1961 – 1972) - U.S. Saturn V – 15 builds (13 successful launches + 2 museum exhibits): 6 human lunar landings - Soviet N-1 – four launches (non-crew); all failed Soviet N-1 Baikonur F-1 engine was key to Saturn V; 8-yr development for $1.77B FY91$ 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 10
2008: General Question of NASA Science Missions Enabled by the Constellation Launch System 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 11
2009 – 2017: Exploring Ballistic Approaches - IACs • Enabling Interstellar Probe (60th IAC – Daejon 2009) • Interstellar Probe: Impact of the Voyager and IBEX Results on Science and Strategy (61st IAC – Prague 2010) • Enabling Interstellar Probe with the Space Launch System (SLS) (65th IAC – Toronto 2014) • Enabling Interstellar Probe: Space Launch System (SLS) Trades (66th IAC – Jerusalem 2015) • Interstellar Probe: Requirements (67th IAC – Guadalajara 2016) • Near-Term Exploration of the Interstellar Medium (68th IAC – Adelaide 2017) 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 12
2018 – 2021: Pragmatic Interstellar Probe Effort • Near -Term Interstellar Probe: First Step (69th IAC – Bremen 2018) • An Interstellar Probe for the Next Heliophysics Decadal Survey (70th IAC – Washington 2019) • A Pragmatic Interstellar Probe Mission: Progress and Status (71st IAC – The CyberSpace Edition 2020) • Interstellar Probe – Destination: Universe! (72nd IAC – Dubai 2021) 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 13
Upper Stages Star48BV Star48GXV Orion 50XL Centaur D Atlas V Centaur Castor 30XL Castor 30B 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 14
Representative Stage Configuration Trades 298 m3 9.9 m 331 m3 9.2 m 4.2 m 85 m3 9.8 m 7.1 m 8.3 m 328 m3 205 m3 259 m3 Atlas V Atlas V Centaur / Star Centaur / Star Castor 30XL / Castor 30B / Atlas V Centaur D 48BV 48GXV Star 48BV Star 48BV Centaur Long Shroud
2018 – 2020: MSFC Developed Performance Details (“traditional”) • For full up analysis required mass versus C3 curves for a variety of SLS and stage configurations • MSFC provided these for SLS Block 2 Cargo and a requested variety of upper stage configurations • SLS Block 1B+ Cargo now referred to as SLS Block 2 Cargo 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 16
2018 – 2020: MSFC Developed Performance Details (”semi-log”) • For full up analysis required mass versus C3 curves for a variety of SLS and stage configurations • MSFC provided these for SLS Block 2 Cargo and a requested variety of upper stage configurations • SLS Block 1B+ Cargo now referred to as SLS Block 2 Cargo 4th Annual Interstellar Probe Exploration Workshop 30 September 2021 17
You can also read