LABOUR LAW RESEARCH NETWORK - 2ND CONFERENCE - Amsterdam 25-27 June 2015
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
ND
2 CONFERENCE
LABOUR LAW RESEARCH NETWORK
Amsterdam
25-27 June 2015
CONTENT
Welcome ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2
Organising Committees .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4
Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
General information ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
Registration and Information Desk .............................................................................................................................................................. 6
WiFi ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7
Full Paper ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Coffee/Tea, Lunches, Drinks and Dinner .................................................................................................................................................... 7
Programme .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
Plenary Sessions ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 9
Opening Session (Moderator: Evert Verhulp) .......................................................................................................................................... 9
Closing Session (Moderator: Beryl ter Haar) ........................................................................................................................................... 9
Thursday 25 June 2015 Overview and Panel Sessions........................................................................................................................ 11
Friday 26 June 2015 Overview and Panel Sessions ............................................................................................................................. 15
Saturday 27 June 2015 Overview and Panel Sessions ........................................................................................................................ 27
Participants .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 34
1WELCOME
Welcome to the University of Amsterdam!
It is a great pleasure to welcome you at the 2nd Conference of the Labour Law Research Network, organized by the
Hugo Sinzheimer Institute, Faculty of Law, of the University of Amsterdam. The venue is the Oudemanhuis (the
elderly men house) dated back to 1601, when these premises housed only 45 elderly men. Today we host 450
registered participants from 45 different countries, who will participate in a total of 72 plenary sessions, as well as a
number of excellent plenary speakers. The conference promises to be a very rich and stimulating event.
This conference comes after a time of prolonged crisis, which put labour and employment relations are under strong
pressure to change. Within this context of a long crisis and uncertainty about the future, we hope that this
Conference can be a moment of reflection on the present and future of labour law and employment relations. We
hope that the Conference will contribute to a better understanding of the functioning of labour relations and labour and employment law in
an international context. In order to stimulate the exchange of ideas, the reflections will take place in a large number of panel sessions
where we scheduled ample time for discussion. These sessions have a wide range of topics like the desirability of a basic income, the
methods of enforcing labour standards and the position of the self-employed worker.
Clearly, there is more than enough to discuss! We hope that you will find these three days to be inspiring, that you will meet old friends and
colleagues, and make and meet new ones, that the Conference inspires you to rethink labour law and enables you to improve it where
possible, and, of course, we hope that you have a very enjoyable stay in Amsterdam.
Best wishes,
Evert Verhulp
Director of the Hugo Sinzheimer Institute and chair of the Labour Law department of the University of Amsterdam
2WELCOME
Dear colleagues,
The Labour Law Research Network was set up four years ago, with the aim of advancing labour law scholarship by
connecting researchers from around the world. To do so, we have a website, where one can find new papers, as well
as information on events and other news relevant for labour law academics; we have a mailing list, which provides a
quick way to disseminate information to more than 700 labour law scholars; and we are holding bi-annual conferences.
The LLRN was set up as a network of labour law research centres/institutes (and labour law departments, where those
exist). There are now 54 centres in the Network, from every continent (except Antarctica…); we rely on the ongoing
contributions of these institutional members, and we are thankful for their support. Of course, the LLRN also serves
individual scholars (not associated with any centre) as well.
The first conference, held two years ago, was hosted by the greDTiSS centre from Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona, and was a
tremendous success. I am very excited to welcome you to the second conference, and would like to thank the fantastic team of the Hugo
Sinzheimer Institute at the University of Amsterdam for hosting this conference, which I am certain will be equally successful.
The LLRN conferences are meant to answer a need for conferences that are entirely academic (organized by scholars and for scholars), at
the highest academic level, and focusing specifically on labour law issues. We strive for conferences that are not only rigorous and
stimulating academically, but also inclusive, non-hierarchical, truly global, collegial and enjoyable. The program before you promises the
potential for such a conference; it is now up to us – the presenters, discussants, chairs and audience – to materialize this potential.
Yours,
Guy Davidov
Chair of the LLRN Steering Committee
3ORGANISING COMMITTEES
International Organising Committee Local Organising Committee
Evert Verhulp, University of Amsterdam (co-Chair) Evert Verhulp (co-Chair)
Guy Davidov, Hebrew University of Jerusalem (co-Chair) Robert Knegt (co-Chair)
Isabelle Daugareilh, Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV Beryl ter Haar (co-ordinator)
Catherine Fisk, University of California Irvine Alexander de Becker
John Howe, University of Melbourne Mies Westerveld
Rochelle Le Roux, University of Cape Town Nuria Ramos Martin
Julia López, Pompeu Fabra University Margreet Kroon
Anna Gorgun
4ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Labour Law Research Network and the Organising Committees welcome and highly appreciate the financial support
of the following foundations, organizations, and members of the LLRN.
International Labour Organization
Instituut Gak
Heineken
Work and Employment Regulation Research Group, Adelaide Law School
Industrial Relations Research & Education Fund, Edwards School of Business
Marco Biagi Foundation, Modena
Labour Law &Development Research Laboratory, McGill University
ReMarkLab, University of Stockholm
Labour Law and Social Security Forum, Hebrew University
Law School of the University of Tilburg
Institute for Labour Law, Georg-August-University Göttingen
Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law, Melbourne Law School
Labor Law Study Group, University of Tokyo
Hugo Sinzheimer Institute at the University of Amsterdam
5GENERAL INFORMATION
The conference is organised by the Hugo Sinzheimer Institute (HSI) at the Amsterdam Law School (ALS).
The address of the Amsterdam Law School is:
Oudemanhuispoort 4-6
1012 CN Amsterdam
The ALS lies in the heart of the city of Amsterdam. It is at
walking distance from Amsterdam Central train station and
can easily be reached by various forms of public transport.
City maps will be handed out upon registration at the
Registration and Information Desk.
The venue of the ALS is a collection of buildings that are all
connected through various hall ways. Each different building
is indicated with a letter, A-K. In order to help you get
oriented and find the plenary lecture halls and the panel
sessions rooms we have included two maps in this
programme.
REGISTRATION AND INFORMATION DESK
The Registration and Information Desk is situated in the
main hall on the ground floor of the Oudemanhuispoort.
The Registration and Information Desk is open on:
Thursday 12:00 – 18:30
Friday 08:30 – 19:00
Saturday 08:30 – 17:00
For urgent matters please call +31 (0)205253136
6GENERAL INFORMATION
WIFI
WiFi login credentials for the conference location will
be handed out upon registration at the Registration
and Information Desk.
FULL PAPER
Many papers have been submitted and uploaded at
the website (http://www.llrn-conference2015.org/).
COFFEE/TEA, LUNCHES, DRINKS AND DINNER
Coffee and tea will be available in the main hall during
the breaks between the panel sessions as indicated
in the detailed programme.
On Friday and Saturday sandwich lunches will be
handed out in the main hall and court yard (in case of
rain it will be in the Atrium).
Friday 12.30 – 13.30
Saturday 12.30 – 13.30
The opening drinks on Thursday will also be in the main hall and the court yard and the conference dinner on Friday will be in the Atrium.
For the dinner a choice of three different cuisines will be offered: Arabic, Italian and Indonesian.
7PROGRAMME
In total the programme includes 72 panels, which are organised in 9 panel sessions, each with 8 parallel panels. In order to guide you
through the programme we have ordered the panels around thematic tracks. In total we have 5 specific tracks, which address the following,
widely formulated themes:
Track 1 Precarious and atypical work as a challenge for labour law
Track 2 Labour law and Industrial relations in (times of) crisis
Track 3 Institutional aspects of labour law
Track 4 Labour related social security law
Track 5 Purpose, scope and boundaries of labour law
Furthermore, each track includes a so called 'Mini Symposium'. In these mini symposia we have tried to bring together panels that are
somewhat more related to each other.
Lastly, we have a General Conference Track, since the conference is not limited to the themes mentioned above, hence it is open to a
variety of research in the wider field of labour/employment law.
At the end of the programme a list of participants is included. For each participant we have indicated in which panel session he or she will
act, either by presenting a paper, being a discussant or chairing a session. This is indicated by the following abbreviations:
PS = panel session, followed by the number of the session;
GCT = general conference track; and
T+number = refers to the specific Track-theme.
Please mind that the programme was sent to the printer on 9 June 2015 and therefore any changes, in for instance titles of papers, after
this date are not included in this programme. See for the most up to date information the programme at: www.llrn-conference2015.org.
8PLENARY SESSIONS
There are two plenary sessions. The first takes place at Thursday from 15.30 - 16.30 hrs, and is the opening session to the conference.
The second takes place exactly 48 hours later, on Saturday from 15.30 - 16.30 and will close the conference.
OPENING SESSION (MODERATOR: EVERT VERHULP) CLOSING SESSION (MODERATOR: BERYL TER HAAR)
Thursday 25 June 2015 Saturday 27 June 2015
15.30 - 16.30 hours 15.30 - 16.30 hours
Lecture Halls D0.08 (live) and D1.09 (live streaming) Lecture Halls D0.08 (live) and D1.09 (live streaming)
Welcome and opening words Theme of the session:
Evert Verhulp Reflections on labour law from the past to the future
Introduction to the Dutch system of social dialogue, also
known as 'the Polder Model' Opening words
Louise Gunning (prof. Health law at theUvA and Member of Beryl ter Haar
the Social Economic Council)
Reflection 1: How Rational should Labour Law be?
Introduction to the new Dutch dismissal law Silvana Sciarra
Evert Verhulp
Reflection 2: Challanges in Labour Law
Ceremony LLRN Award for Distinguished Contributions to Manfred Weiss
Labour Law
- Laudatio by Mark Freedland for Silvana Sciarra Plenary discussion with all the participants
- Laudatio by Nicola Smit for Manfred Weiss
Music by the Dr. Ter Haar-Trio Closing words
Evert Verhulp and Guy Davidov
9NOTES
10THURSDAY 25 JUNE 2015 OVERVIEW AND PANEL SESSIONS
12:00 – 18:30 REGISTRATION MAIN HALL
14:00 – 15:00 MEETING ADVISORY BOARD ROOM C0.17
15:30 – 16:30 PLENARY OPENING SESSION
LECTURE HALLS D0.08 (LIVE) + D1.09 (LIVE-STREAMING)
16:45 – 18:15 PANEL SESSION 1
Gen Conf Track Track1 Track 2 Track 3 Track 4 Track 5 Min Symp I Min Symp II
Room C3.23 Room C2.17 Room C2.23 Room C1.17 Room C3.17 Room F2.01C Room F0.02 Room C0.17
18:15 - DRINKS MAIN HALL/COURT YARD/ATRIUM
11THURSDAY 16:45 – 18:15 PANEL SESSION 1
GENERAL CONFERENCE TRACK TRACK 1 TRACK 2 TRACK 3
ROOM C3.23 ROOM C2.17 ROOM C2.23 ROOM C1.17
Working hours and labour rights in The concepts of the employer and Essential questions on collective Youth employment policy revisited:
the 21st Century the worker bargaining – comparative what role for labour law?
perspective
Chair: L. Mella, University of Santiago Chair: B. Waas, Goethe University Chair: P. Lorber, University of Chair: S. Klosse, Maastricht University,
de Compostela, Spain Frankfurt am Main, Germany Leicester, UK The Netherlands
Discussant: N. Countouris, University
Working Hours and Overtime: Balancing College London, UK Decentralisation tendencies in collective EU Youth Policy - is coordinated
Economic Interests and Fundamental bargaining in The Netherlands. F. governance the right way forward? N.
Rights in a Globalized Economy. W.L. Group structures and Pennings and T. Jaspers, Utrecht Büttgen, University of Maastricht, B.P.
Roozendaal and R.F. Hoekstra, VU employership: leaving the formal University, The Netherlands ter Haar, University of Amsterdam, M.
University Amsterdam, The Netherlands approach behind–a Dutch and EU Kullmann, University of Maastricht, The
perspective. R.M. Beltzer,University of Essential questions on collective Netherlands
Limitations on Working Time Flexibility. Amsterdam and F. Laagland, Radboud bargaining - France. N. Moizard and C.
L. Pisarczyk, University of Warsaw, University Nijmegen, The Netherlands Sachs-Durand, University of NEET - can the Dutch tackle their
Poland Strasbourg, France needs? S. Bekker, Tilburg University
The Concept of the Employer. J. and S. Klosse, University of Maastricht,
LabourOrganisation, Work-Life Balance Prassl, University of Oxford, United Collective Bargaining and workers’ The Netherlands
and Collective Bargaining. V.S. Leccese Kingdom (trade union) representation: the
and C. Spinelli, University of Bari Aldo company level in Italy. E. Ales, Alternative approaches to combat youth
Moro, Italy Who is a 'worker' in international law? University of Cassino, Italy and I. unemployment - The case of the South
S. McCrystal (presenter), University of Senatori, Marco Biagi Foundation, African Employment Tax Incentive Act.
Techno-stress and the Right to Sydney and B. Creighton, RMIT University of Modena and Reggio A. Rycroft, University of Cape town,
Disconnect. J. Popma, University of University, Australia Emilia, Italy South Africa
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
The impact of anti-crisis measures on The European Quality Framework for
national collective bargaining systems: traineeships - What can the EU learn
The Spanish case. N. Castelli, from Spain? A. Todoli Signes,
University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain University of Valencia, Spain
12THURSDAY 16:45 – 18:15 PANEL SESSION 1
TRACK 4 TRACK 5 MINI SYMPOSIUM I MINI SYMPOSIUM II
ROOM C3.17 ROOM F2.01C ROOM F0.02 ROOM C0.17
Self-employment on the brink of Maximising capabilities and other Tackling informal work arrangements The transformation of collective
labour law and entrepreneurship ideas of labour law in the domestic and home-care bargaining in times of crisis
sector
Chair: L.A. Williams, Northeastern Chair: A. Eleveld, VU University Chair: V. van Goethem, ILO Chair: F. Hendrickx, University of
University, Boston, United States Amsterdam, The Netherlands Leuven, Belgium
Self-employed and labour law: the Rethinking Personal Work Relations: Regulating Domestic Work from the The Transformation of Joint Regulation
balance between protection and Human Capability, Relational Rights International to the National and Labour Market Policy in Europe
stimulation. The case of The and Restorative Labour Market Perspective: The Legal Protection of during the Crisis: A Seven-Country
Netherlands. M. Westerveld and I. Zaal, Regulation. B.P. Archibald, Dalhousie Domestic Workers in Spain and the Comparison. A. Koukiadaki, M.
University of Amsterdam, The University, Canada Netherlands. N. E. Ramos Martín, Martinez Lucio and I. Tavora,
Netherlands University of Amsterdam, The University of Manchester, United
A farewell to ‘protection’: Rethinking the Netherlands Kingdom
Self-employment versus traditional labour law-market nexus. R. Knegt,
employment - an analysis from the University of Amsterdam, The On the Home Front: Care workers in the Collective bargaining for younger and
perspectives of the labour market and Netherlands shadows of fair labour regulation. S. older workers in times of crisis. An
the individual. A. Westregård, Lund Bernstein, Université du Québec à international comparative study on
University, Sweden The Relevance of Political Theories of Montréal, Canada opportunities and barriers in integrated
Domination to Labour Law. R. Zahn, approaches. F. Tros and M. Keune,
Self-employment in EU Member States: University of Stirling and D. Cabrelli, “Almost Family”: Brazilian judiciary and University of Amsterdam, The
The role for equality law. A. Blackham University of Edinburgh, United stipendiary domestic workers. F. de Netherlands
and C. Barnard, University of Kingdom Medina da Silva Gomes, Universidade
Cambridge, United Kingdom Federal Fluminense, Brazil Rediscovering the core functions and
Capability Approach and Labour Law. purposes of collective labour
Economically dependent work: the R. Del Punta, Florence University, Italy Homecare work and unpaid labour. A organisation and action: Three
Eastern-European perspective. T. critique of UK National Minimum Wage examples from crisis Greece. F. Vergis,
Gyulavári, Pázmány Péter Catholic law. L. Hayes, Cardiff University, United University of Cambridge, United
University, Hungary Kingdom Kingdom
The Age of ‘Europeanized De-
centralisation’: Mapping the ‘convergent’
crisis regulatory trajectories of collective
bargaining structures in eight EU
Member States. M. Biasi, Ca’ Foscari
University, Italy and I. Katsaroumpas,
University of Oxford, United Kingdom
13NOTES
14FRIDAY 26 JUNE 2015 OVERVIEW AND PANEL SESSIONS
09:00 – 10:30 PANEL SESSION 2
Gen Conf Track Track1 Track 2 Track 3 Track 4 Track 5 Min Symp I Min Symp II
Room C1.17 Room C0.23 Room C2.23 Room F0.02 Room A0.08 Room C0.17 Room C2.17 Room F2.01C
COFFEE/TEA BREAK
11:00 - 12.30 PANEL SESSION 3
Gen Conf Track Track1 Track 2 Track 3 Track 4 Track 5 Min Symp II Min Symp III
Room C1.17 Room C0.23 Room C2.23 Room C0.17 Room F0.02 Room A0.08 Room F2.01C Room C2.17
LUNCH
13:30 - 15.00 PANEL SESSION 4
Gen Conf Track Track1 Track 2 Track 3 Track 4 Track 5 Min Symp I Min Symp II
Room C1.17 Room C0.23 Room C2.23 Room C0.17 Room F0.02 Room A0.08 Room C2.17 Room F2.01C
15:15 - 16.15 PANEL SESSION 5 (SHORT)
Gen Conf Track Track2 Track 3 Track 4 Track 5 Min Symp II Min Symp IV Min Symp V
Room C1.17 Room C2.23 Room C0.17 Room F0.02 Room A0.08 Room F2.01C Room C0.23 Room C2.17
COFFEE/TEA BREAK
16:45 - 18:15 PANEL SESSION 6
Gen Conf Track Track1 Track 2 Track 3 Track 5 Min Symp III Min Symp IV Min Symp V
Room C1.17 Room C0.23 Room C2.23 Room C0.17 Room A0.08 Room F2.01C Room F0.02 Room C2.17
19.00 - CONFERENCE DINNER (ATRIUM)
15FRIDAY 09.00 – 10.30 PANEL SESSION 2
GENERAL CONFERENCE TRACK TRACK 1 TRACK 2 TRACK 3
ROOM C1.17 ROOM C0.23 ROOM C2.23 ROOM F0.02
Austerity measures and labour law Labor law in China: challenges ahead Privatizing workplace justice:
Roundtable: The fissured workplace reforms: a comparative perspective empirical and North-South
comparative perspectives
Chair: M. W. Finkin, University of Chair: A. Guamán Hernández, Chair: J. Ye , Peking University, China Chair and discussant: C. F. Rosado
Illinois, United States Universitat de València, Spain Marzán, IIT-Chicago-Kent College of
The Road towards Decent Work for Law, United States
Discussants: The impact of the economic crisis on the Domestic Workers in China. D. Hu,
G. Davidov, Hebrew University of evolution of French labour law: the Southwest University of Political Employment arbitration in the US:
Jerusalem, Israel rising of the labour market’s law. T. Science and Law and J. Ye, Peking Privatized justice and inequality in the
Sachs, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre University, China workplace. A.J. Colvin, Cornell
R. Fragale, Universidade Federal La Défense, France University, United States
Fluminense, Brazil Judicial Governance Logic on Workers’
Impeachment for Italian labour law: Collective Actions in China - Based on Rule of Law and the Arbitration Council
Z. Qi, The Japan Institute for Labour convict the judge is sufficient to get out 308 Published Case Decisions From of Cambodia. A. Ponak and D. Taras,
Policy and Training, Japan of the crisis? F. Martelloni, Università di 2008 to 2014. T. Wang, Tsinghua University of Saskatchewan, Canada
Bologna, Italy University, China
R. Johnstone, Queensland University of An Empirical Comparison of the
Technology, Australia The Impact of Austerity and Labour Law China’s Antidiscrimination Legislation: Handling of Statutory Human Rights
Reform: The case of Greece. L. Difficulties and Future. B. Wang, Claims in Arbitration in Ontario and
W.N. Njoya, Queen's University, Kretsos, University of Greenwich, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China Before The Human Rights Tribunal of
Canada United Kingdom Ontario. M. Malin (presenter) , IIT-
China’s Responsive Labor Law Reform: Chicago Kent College of Law, United
P. Herzfeld Oolsson, Uppsala Austerity and labour law: the Spanish The Case of Employment Discrimination States; S. Slinn, York University,
University, Sweden case. A. Guamán Hernández, Law. T. Yan, Peking University, China Canada and J.M. Werner, University of
Universitat de Valencia, Spain Wisconsin-Whitewater, United States
E. Sjodin, Uppsala University, Sweden
E. Menegatti, University of Bologna,
Italy
16FRIDAY 09.00 – 10.30 PANEL SESSION 2
TRACK 4 TRACK 5 MINI SYMPOSIUM I MINI SYMPOSIUM II
ROOM A0.08 ROOM C0.17 ROOM C2.17 ROOM F2.01C
Welfare state policies Free trade agreements and the Modern slavery and domestic work Unions and politics – comparative
impact on labour regulation and theoretical perspectives 1
Chair: N. Zatz, UCLA, United States Chair: L. Compa, Cornell University, Chair and discussant: M. Freedland, Chair: K. Stone, UCLA, United States
United States Oxford University, United Kingdom
Protection, Activation and Elevation: Lack of means of enforcing compliance. From Required Intimacy to Forced Are Unions a Constitutional Anomaly?
Restoring the Balance. G. Vonk, J.S. Vogt, ITUC, United States Labour: The Case of Domestic Workers C. Estlund, New York University, United
University of Groningen, The in Israel and the UK. E. Albin, Hebrew States
Netherlands FTAs in Asia-Pacific: “Next Generation” University, Israel
of Social Dimension Provisions on Trade unions and politics - a conceptual
Workfare Revisited. A. Eleveld, VU Labor? R. Brown, University of Hawaii, Overseas Domestic Workers in the suggestion from a German perspective.
University and A. Paz-Fuchs, University United States United Kingdom: A Visa of M. Weiss, J.W. Goethe University of
of Sussex, United Kingdom Enslavement. V. Mantouvalou, Frankfurt, Germany
Bringing Labor Clauses in Free Trade University College London, United
Workfare Programmes in Social Agreements within the Orbit of the Kingdom A comparative study of unions and
Assistance Schemes v. the Prohibition Global Governance System. J.R. politics. K. Stone, UCLA, United States
of Forced Labour and the Right to Bellace, the University of Pennsylvania, Migrant Domestic Workers in British and H. Arthurs, York University,
Freely Chosen Work: a Critical Review United States Columbia, Canada: UnFreedom, Canada
of the International Human Rights Case Trafficking, and Domestic Servitude. J.
Law. E. Dermine, University of Louvain, TTIP, ISDS, Labor Rights: The quest for Fudge, Kent Law School, United Unions, political parties and the State
Belgium a new generation of labor chapters in Kingdom structure: Subordination, integration and
the mega-treaties. M. Faioli, Tor social dialogue. J-M Servais,
Conditionality and benefit sanctions: Vergata University, Italy ISLLSS/ILO, Switzerland
time for a rethink. M. Adler, University
of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
17FRIDAY 11.00 – 12.30 PANEL SESSION 3
GENERAL CONFERENCE TRACK TRACK 1 TRACK 2 TRACK 3
ROOM C1.17 ROOM C0.23 ROOM C2.23 ROOM C0.17
Health and safety issues: Roundtable: Doing research on New governance institutions in the
employers’responses and unions' Regulating atypical work Chinese labour law work arena
role
Chair: I. Senatori, Marco Biagi Chair: G.J.J. Heerma van Voss, Co-chair: A. Neal, Warwick Law Chair and discussant: J. Lopez
Foundation, University of Modena and Leiden University, The Netherlands School, United Kingdom Lopez, Pompeu Fabra University, Spain
Reggio Emilia, Italy
The Impact of Atypical Work in Italy and Co-chair: J. Ye, Peking University, The Hard and the Soft: Labour Law
Psychological Harassment Legislation Russia. O. Rymkevich, Marco Biagi China (Nervously) Confronts New Governance
and Unions in Québec: Space for Foundation, University of Modena and Institutions. B. Langille, University of
Collective Mobilization within the Reggio Emilia, Italy Interpreter: Y. Wu, University of Toronto, Canada
Boundaries of a Complex Legal Helsinki, Finland
Framework? R. Cox, UQAM, Canada Starting up from the 99/70 EU Directive The potential for multi-level collective
on Fixed-term work: in search of a Discussants: bargaining connections to legal
Comparing Introspective and "European model" of temporary work frameworks? T. Novitz, University of
Extrospective Forms of Occupational available and useful for the national S. Cooney, ILO/University of Bristol, United Kingdom
Safety and Health Standards. U.C. legislator and judges. M. Aimo, Melbourne, Australia
Orazulike, University of Manchester, University of Turin, Italy Better Regulation: analysis of the
United Kingdom R. Brown, University of Hawaii, United European Union strategies in law
The one-year trial period in Spanish States making or the denaturation of EU
Dismissal on the grounds of HIV/AIDS permanent employment contracts: a (labour) law as adjustment factor to
status: A reflection with reference to new kind of atypical work? I. Alzaga D. Yan, Beijing Foreign Study competitiveness and growth? I.
three different court decisions with a Ruiz, Universidad Nacional de University, China Schömann, ETUI, Belgium
similar outcome. K. Pärli, Zurich Educación a Distancia, Spain
University of Applied Sciences, T. Yan, Peking University, China
Switzerland Social Dialogue, Atypical Work and
Strikes: Any Cure for the Trust Deficit?
S. van Eck, University of Pretoria,
South Africa
18FRIDAY 11.00 – 12.30 PANEL SESSION 3
TRACK 4 TRACK 5 MINI SYMPOSIUM II MINI SYMPOSIUM III
ROOM F0.02 ROOM A0.08 ROOM F2.01C ROOM C2.17
The role of law in the Unions and politics – comparative Fundamental rights: hard -soft/public
Pensions commodification and subordination and theoretical perspectives 2 -private regulation
of labour
Chair: E. McGaughey, King's College Chair: G. Davidov, Hebrew University Chair and discussant: H. Arthurs, Chair: R. Zandvliet, Leiden University,
London, United Kingdom of Jerusalem, Israel York University, Canada the Netherlands
A comparative approach to regressive What is “Labour is not a commodity”? — Political Activism of Organizations. C. Compliance with fundamental social
legal reforms of retirement pensions in Commodification of Labour Force and Fisk, University of California, United rights: an onion to peel. B.P. ter Haar,
Portugal, Spain and Italy. E. Colàs its Reflection on Labour Law. M. Ishida, States University of Amsterdam, The
Neila, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain Waseda University Tokyo, Japan Netherlands and N. Lyutov, Kutafin
Neoliberal and neocorporatist policies in Moscow State Law University, Russia
Active Aging through Employment in The Principle of Nonwaiver of Workers’ France, Italy and Spain: Can trade
Poland – Towards a Sustainable Model? Rights in the United States: A Latin unions participate in the governance of Promoting fundamental labour rights
A Social Reproduction Perspective. A. American Perspective. S. Gamonal, economic globalisation without risking through investment polices: an analysis
Zbyszewska, Warwick Law School, Adolfo Ibañez University, Chile and C. their soul?. J.P. Landa Zapirain, of the international finance corporation's
United Kingdom F. Rosado Marzán, Chicago-Kent University of the Basque Country, Spain performance standards on
College of Law, United States environmental and social policy. R.-C.
Do Employees Benefit from Privately Labor Law and American Political Drouin, University of Montreal, Canada
Managed Pension Programs? An The right to equality versus employer Development. M. Dimick, SUNY
empirical study of public and private ‘control’ and employee ‘subordination’: Buffalo, United States The interaction of private and public
pension funds. L. Lurie, Tel-Aviv Are some more equal than others? D. labour regulation: A case study of Better
University, Israel du Toit, University of the Western Work Indonesia. O. Dupper (ILO and
Cape, South Africa University of Stellenbosch) and C.
Flexible pensions for atypical workers: Fenwick (ILO and Melbourne Law
the case of artists in Switzerland. A. A theory of reciprocal fiduciary School)
Meier, Schneider Troillet law firm, obligations in employment. M.T. Bodie,
Switzerland Saint Louis University, United States A secret club of European workers? -
Employee involvement in the context of
globalization. S. Hungler, ELTE Faculty
of Law, Hungary.
19FRIDAY 13.30 – 15.00 PANEL SESSION 4
GENERAL CONFERENCE TRACK TRACK 1 TRACK 2 TRACK 3
ROOM C1.17 ROOM C0.23 ROOM C2.23 ROOM C0.17
Work, family and working time Regulating markets and labour – Regulation of wages and related
policies Discrimination law in South Africa Nordic, European and global challenges
perspectives
Chair: R. Glofcheski, University of Conveners: F.Q. Cilliers and J.V. du Chair: N. Bruun, Hanken School of Chair: M. Keune, Amsterdam Institute
Hong Kong, China Plessis, University of the Free State, Economics, Finland and Stockholm of Advanced labour Studies/University
South Africa University, Sweden of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Balancing employment and
responsibilities for elderly relatives? H. Absence without leave: The validity of a Discussant: TBA Discussant: R.F. Hoekstra, VU
Petterson, University of Lund, Sweden traditional healer’s sick note and the University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
right not to be discriminated against The Role of International Financial
Parental leave rights: current challenges based on ‘culture’., J. V. du Plessis, Institutions in the Promotion and Mind the gap”: Widening income
and future directions.S. Rodríguez University of the Free State, South Implementation of International Labour inequality in South Africa – an
González, La Laguna University, Spain Africa Standards on Freedom of Association institutional failure or mission
and Collective Bargaining. M. impossible? D. Collier, University of
Precarious Work and Work-Family Disability and “Reasonable Mwakagali, Stockholm University, Cape Town, South Africa
Reconciliation: A New Zealand Accommodation” in South Africa: An Sweden
Perspective. A. Reilly, Victoria Unbalanced Scale? L. Fourie, The Gratuitous Wage: Thoughts on
University of Wellington, A. Masselot, University of the Free State, South Collective Agreements in Private Economics, Psychology, Culture and
Canterbury University, New Zealand Africa International Law. E. Sinander, Law. M.W. Finkin, University of Illinois,
(presenters) and R. Stringer, Victoria Stockholm University, Sweden United States
University of Wellington, New Zealand Why should we care? Bullying in the
workplace: an international overview. A bottom-up perspective on Wage devaluation: a Legal and
Working time rights: two opposing D.M. Smit and J.V. du Plessis, transnational collective bargaining. K. Economic perspective. A. Belén Muñoz
models in Europe? Directive University of the Free State, South Ahlberg, Stockholm University, Sweden Ruiz and D. Pérez del Prado,
2003/88/EC vs. European Social Africa Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain
Charter. N. Pumar Beltrán, University
of Barcelona, Spain Could social media be a gateway to
employment discrimination? F. Q.
Cilliers, University of the Free State,
South Africa
Unfair discrimination or affirmative
action?: A police captain, nine years and
five cases. M. Conradie, University of
the Free State, South Africa
20FRIDAY 13.30 – 15.00 PANEL SESSION 4
TRACK 4 TRACK 5 MINI SYMPOSIUM I MINI SYMPOSIUM II
ROOM F0.02 ROOM A0.08 ROOM C2.17 ROOM F2.01C
Age discrimination and labour law:
Flexicurity and occupational welfare: comparative and conceptual Work and legality in an inclusive Unions and politics – national studies
threat or menace? perspectives in the EU and beyond society
(book presentation)
Chair:A. Neal, University of Warwick, Chairs: A. Numhauser-Henning and Chairs: O. Bonardi, University of Chair: F.J. Trillo Parraga, University of
United Kingdom M. Rönnmar, Lund University, Milan, Italy and G.G. Balandi, Castilla-La Mancha, Spain
Sweden University of Ferrara, Italy
Spanish Unions and Democratic
Discussant: E. Ales, University of Discussant: S. Fredman, University Discussant: J. Cruz Villalon, Sevilla Engagement. F.J. Trillo Parraga , UCLM,
Cassino, Italy of Oxford, United Kingdom University, Spain Spain
Values, Interests and Players in Speakers: Legal Framework for Social Services. Antiquae famae custos? Trade unions
Occupational Welfare Schemes: a T. Araki, University of Tokyo, Japan A Gender Oriented Proposal. S. and politics in Poland. M. Raczkowski ,
“Reflexive” Regulatory Model for Borelli, University of Ferrara, Italy and University of Warsaw, Poland
Flexicurity? I. Senatori, Marco Biagi J. Fudge, Kent Law School, United P. Vielle, University of Louvain-La-
Foundation, University of Modena and Kingdom Neuve, Belgium Institutional Bypasses in Brazil’s New
Reggio Emilia, Italy Unionism Movement: Central Unions and
T. MacDermott, Macquarie Work and Legality in the Cross- Workers’ Committees. A.V.M. Gomes,
High Road Strategies Between University, Australia Country Dimension: A Reflection on Universidade de Fortaleza, Brazil and M.
Competitiveness and Personal and Social the EU Approach. M. Peruzzi Mota Prado, University of Toronto,
Needs: Insight From an Organizational J. Riley, University of Sydney, (presenter) University of Verona, Italy Canada
Analysis of a Concrete Pathway to Australia and A. Baylos Grau, Castilla-La
Flexicurity.Y. Curzi, Marco Biagi Mancha University, Spain Between Autonomy and
Foundation, University of Modena and A. Zbyszewska, University of Interdependence: Trade Unions and
Reggio Emilia, Italy Warwick Law School, United Kingdom The Social Borders of the European Politics in Italy. V. Pietrogiovanni, Lund
Union’s Immigration Policy. L. Calafà, University, Sweden
Bilateralism as the high road to win-win University of Verona and O. Bonardi,
welfare? Lessons from the Italian case.L. University of Milan, Italy
Di Stefano, Marco Biagi Foundation,
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia,
Italy
21FRIDAY 15.15 - 16.16 PANEL SESSION 5 (SHORT)
GENERAL CONFERENCE TRACK TRACK 2 TRACK 3 TRACK 4
ROOM C1.17 ROOM C2.23 ROOM C0.17 ROOM F0.02
Recent reforms in the public sector: Risk: a new perspective in labour law Research handbook on transnational Women’s rights to social security
the changing role of the state as (book presentation) labour law and social protection
employer in comparative perspective (book presentation) (book presentation)
(I)
Chair: A. de Becker, University of Chair: S. Laulom, University Lumière Chairs: A. Blackett, McGill University, Chair: L. Lamarche, Université du
Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Lyon 2, France Canada and A. Trebilcock, University Québec à Montréal, Canada
University of Hasselt, Belgium of Göttingen, Germany and University of
Discussants: Paris 10, France Discussant: D. Gesualdi-Fecteau,
The inter-relationship between C. Kilpatrick, EUI Florence, Italy and J. Université du Québec à Montréal
administrative law and labour law: Public M. Miranda Boto, University of Discussant: P. van der Heijden, (UQAM), Canada
sector employment perspectives from Santiago de Compostela, Spain University of Leiden, The Netherlands
South Africa. M.P. Olivier, Northwest Participating authors:
University, and A. Govindjee, Nelson Presenter: Participating authors: B. Smith, University of Sydney,
Mandela Metropolitan University, South P. Loi, University of Cagliari, Italy S. Cooney, ILO/University of Australia
Africa Melbourne, Australia
Participating authors: P. Arellano Ortiz, Universidad Austral
Bargaining in the Broader Public Sector: N. Gundt, Maastricht University, The J. Diller, International Labour Office, de Chile, Chile
What Role for the State? A Canadian Netherlands Geneva, Switzerland
Case Study. P. Cameron and P. N. Pumar Beltrán, Barcelona
Burton, British Columbia, Canada J.J. Votinius, Lund University, Sweden I. Martin, University of Montreal, University, Spain
Canada
Public employment and access to justice Y. Maneiro Vazquez, University of L. Lamarche, Université du Québec à
in EU employment law. L. Rodgers, Santiago de Compostela, Spain F. Milman-Sivan, University of Haifa, Montréal, Canada
University of Leicester, United Kingdom Israel
M-C Escande-Varniol, University S. Fredman, University of Oxford,
Lumière Lyon 2, France R-M. Belle Antoine, University of the United Kingdom
West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago
L.A. Williams, Northeastern University,
Boston, United States
22FRIDAY 15.15 - 16.16 PANEL SESSION 5 (SHORT)
TRACK 5 MINI SYMPOSIUM II MINI SYMPOSIUM IV MINI SYMPOSIUM V
ROOM A0.08 ROOM F2.01C ROOM C0.23 ROOM C2.17
New frontiers in empirical labour law Law against strikes: the South Activation policies for the The labour constitution: the enduring
research African experience in an international unemployed, the right to work and idea of labour law
(book presentation) and comparative perspective the duty to work (author meets reader)
(book presentation) (book presentation)
Discussant: M. Rönnmar, Lund Chair: M. Weiss, Goethe University Chair: E. Dermine, Université Chair: D. Ashiagbor, SOAS, University
University, Sweden Frankfurt am Main, Germany Catholique de Louvain, Belgium of London, United Kingdom
Participating authors: Discussants: Discussant: V. Mantouvalou, Author: R. Dukes, University of
A. Ludlow, University of Cambridge, N. Smit, NWU Faculty of Law, South University College London, United Glasgow, United Kingdom
United Kingdom Africa and V. De Stefano, ILO, Kingdom
Switzerland and Bocconi University, Readers:
A. Blackham, University of Cambridge, Italy Participating authors: E. Christodoulidis, University of
United Kingdom E. Dermine, Université Catholique de Glasgow, United Kingdom
Editors: Louvain , Belgium
S. Manfredi, Oxford Brookes University, R. Le Roux, University of Cape Town, J. Fudge, Kent Law School, United
United Kingdom South Africa D. Dumont, Université Libre de Kingdom
Bruxelles, Belgium
L. Vickers, Oxford Brookes University, B. Hepple, University of Cambridge, K. Klare, Northeastern University,
United Kingdom United Kingdom R. Hoop, VIVES University College Boston, United States
Bruges, Belgium
S. Deakin, University of Cambridge, S. Sciarra, Constitutional Court of Italy G. Mundlak, Tel Aviv University, Israel
United Kingdom and University of Florence, Italy
M. Fischl, University of Connecticut,
United States
23FRIDAY 16:45 – 18:15 PANEL SESSION 6
GENERAL CONFERENCE TRACK TRACK 1 TRACK 2 TRACK 4
ROOM C1.17 ROOM C0.23 ROOM C2.23 ROOM C0.17
Recent reforms in the public sector:
the changing role of the state as Precarious employment and the duty to The right to strike Regional and constitutional
employer in comparative work developments of social rights
perspective (II)
Chair: A. Kun, Károli Gáspár Chair: A. Musiala, Adam-Mickiewicz- Chair: E. Gerasimova, Higher School Chair: U. Belavusau, VU University
University and the National Public Universität Poznań, Poland of Economics Moscow, Russia Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Service University, Budapest, Hungary
Precarious work and the obligation of The Norm of Industrial Action according Constitutionalizing labour rights: “fair
Discussant: R.-C. Drouin, University unemployed to accept “suitable” to Taiwan’s new “Three Labor Laws", S- labour practices” as a constitutional
of Montreal, Canada employment. A. de le Court, Universitat H. Liu, Ming-Chuan University, Taiwan standard in Kenya. V.K. Mutai, Moi
Pompeu Fabra, Spain University School of Law, Kenya
The State as employer, but who is the Challenging the right to strike or
state in collective bargaining: a Unacceptable forms of work (UFW): attacking the ILO’s monitoring system? Constitutions and social rights in
comparison between Denmark, towards a strategic regulation model for a The possible consequences of recent times of European crisis. C.
Sweden, Italy and the Netherlands. A. new policy agenda. D. McCann, Durham employers’ claims on the enforcement Kilpatrick, European University
de Becker, University of Amsterdam Law School, and J. Fudge, Kent Law perspectives of international labour Institute Florence, Italy
and University of Hasselt, Belgium School, United Kingdom standards, M. Borzaga and R.
Salomone, University of Trento, Italy ASEAN: Harmonizing Labor
Collective agreements in the public Remembering rest periods in law: another Standards for Global Integration. R.
sector: a comparative legal research tool to limit excessive working hours. N. Legislation as an appropriate medium Brown, University of Hawai‘i, United
between Belgium and Denmark. E. Ghosheh, ILO, Switzerland for controlling industrial relations – a States
Aerts, University of Hasselt, Belgium view from history, J. Lane, University of
The duty to work in consideration of social Huddersfield, United Kingdom EU-Georgia association agreement:
Evaluating public employees’ benefits: human dignity and welfare a pattern for labour law development
performance in Italy: the tricky balance policies in the economic crisis. A. Topo, Contractual limits to the right to strike in in Georgia. Z. Shvelidze, Tbilisi State
between a business-like approach and Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy the era of crisis. The Italian case with University, Georgia.
the traditional labour law principles. A. some comparative reliefs (France and
Riefoli, University of Cassino and the U.K.). L. Carollo (Isfol), A. Rota
Southern Lazio, Italy (Università di Bologna), and M. Russo
(Università di Roma Sapienza)
24FRIDAY 16:45 – 18:15 PANEL SESSION 6
TRACK 5 MINI SYMPOSIUM III MINI SYMPOSIUM IV MINI SYMPOSIUM V
ROOM A0.08 ROOM F2.01C ROOM F0.02 ROOM C2.17
Value chains, CSR and companies’ Social protection for unprotected Roundtable: Transformative labour
strategies ILO trajectories workers (I) law
Chair: Brynn O'Brien, University of Convenor and chair: C. La Hovary, Chair: M. Risak, University of Vienna, Chair: D. Ashiagbor, SOAS,
Technology, Sydney, Australia University of Glasgow, United Kingdom Austria University of London, United
Kingdom
Holding ‘lead’ firms accountable for Pluralism and privatization in transnational Why is labour protection for temporary
labour conditions in contractors and labour regulation: adaptation of the migrant workers so fraught? An Speakers:
sub-contractors: What role for labour International Labour Organization. J. Diller, Australian perspective. J. Tham, I. D.M. Davis, High Court of South
law and what role for other law in South International Labour Office, Geneva, Campbell and M. Boese, University of Africa and University of Cape Town,
Africa? S. Godfrey, University of Cape Switzerland Melbourne, Australia South Africa
Town, South Africa
The Authority of International Lawmaking Extending protection to informal workers C. O'Cinneide, University College
The Many Uses of Labour Law in within the International Labour – evaluating the usefulness of labour London, United Kingdom
Navigating the Troubled Waters of Organization: Between discourse and social security law techniques and
Socially Responsible Corporate confrontation and discourse control. A. innovation. M.P. Olivier, Northwest K. Rittich, University of Toronto,
Governance. I. Martin, University of Nunes Chaib, Université Paris I Panthéon- University, South Africa Canada
Montreal, Canada Sorbonne, France and the Max Planck
Institute for International, European and Protection mechanisms for informal B. Rogers, Temple University,
Retrenchment Law in Indonesia and Regulatory Procedural Law, Luxembourg workers in Latin America: recent Philadelphia, United States
Malaysia: A Comparative Evaluation. developments. P. Arellano Ortiz,
B. Santoso, Universitas Brawijaya, What is Work? Legal reflections on the Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile A. Santos, Georgetown University,
Indonesia (presenting) and K. Halili ILO’s key concept. J. Agusti-Panareda , United States
Hasan, Universiti Kebangsaan International Labour Organisation, Social protections for informal workers:
Malaysia, Malaysia Switzerland and C. La Hovary, University a realm by evanescent boundaries. J. Satpute, Human Rights Lawyer
of Glasgow, United Kingdom C.M. Cammalleri, University of and Co-founder of Nazdeek, India
Heineken: labour relations and Palermo, Italy
company strategies to cope with them. Labour Provisions in Trade Agreements: A L.A. Williams, Northeastern
R. Goethart, Heineken, Amsterdam, “mixed blessing” for the ILO’s Standards University, Boston, United States
The Netherlands System? F. Ebert, Max Planck Institute for
Comparative Public Law and International
Law, Germany
25NOTES
26SATURDAY 27 JUNE 2015 OVERVIEW AND PANEL SESSIONS
09:00 – 10:30 PANEL SESSION 7
Gen Conf Track Track1 Track 2 Track 3 Track 5 Min Symp I Min Symp III Min Symp IV
Room C2.17 Room C0.23 Room C0.17 Room C2.23 Room C1.17 Room F2.01C Room F0.02 Room A0.08
COFFEE/TEA BREAK
11:00 - 12.30 PANEL SESSION 8
Gen Conf Track Track1 Track 2 Track 3 Track 4 Track 5 Min Symp I Min Symp V
Room C1.17 Room A0.08 Room C2.23 Room C0.17 Room C2.17 Room F0.02 Room F2.01C Room C0.23
LUNCH
13:30 - 15.00 PANEL SESSION 9
Track 1 Track 2 Track 3 Track 4 Track 5 Min Symp III Min Symp IV Min Symp V
Room F0.02 Room F2.01C Room C2.23 Room C0.23 Room C2.17 Room A0.08 Room C0.17 Room C1.17
COFFEE/TEA BREAK
15:30 - 16:30 PLENARY CLOSING SESSION
LECTURE HALLS D0.08 (LIVE) + D1.09 (LIVE-STREAMING)
27SATURDAY 09:00 – 10:30 PANEL SESSION 7
General Conference Track Track 1 Track 2 Track 3
Room C2.17 Room C0.23 Room C0.17 Room C2.23
Seeing the invisible fist: state power The transformation of industrial Searching for new enforcement
in precarious work Vulnerable groups of workers relations: on (trans)national and methods
subnational level
Chair: N. Zatz, UCLA, United States Chair: E.M. Barmes, Queen Mary Chair: B.P. ter Haar, University of Chair and discussant: E. Verhulp,
University of London, United Kingdom Amsterdam, The Netherlands University of Amsterdam, The
Discussant: J. Howe, Melbourne Law Netherlands
School, Australia The role of the social partners in Global production networks and
tackling with older workers’ difficulties in transnational labour regulation: New Brandishing the Brand: Enhancing
Beyond coercion: undocumented the labour market: the Spanish Strategy geographies of collective bargaining. S. Employer Compliance through the
workers and workplace immigration 55+ in the EU policy context. H. Ysàs Canalda Criado, Pompeu Fabra Regulatory Enrolment of Franchisors. T.
enforcement. K. Kim, Loyola Law Molinero, Autonomous University of University, Spain Hardy, Melbourne Law School,
School, United States Barcelona, Spain Australia
Organizing workers in ‘hybrid systems’:
A New Peonage?: Debt Enforcement as Precariousness of Trainees that Work in comparing trade union strategies in Turning workers into whistleblowers?:
Labor Regulation in the Era of the Framework of Traineeship Austria, Germany, Israel and the risks at the workplace and technical
Precarious Work. N. Zatz, UCLA, United Agreement: The Case of Estonia with Netherlands. G. Mundlak, Tel-Aviv democracy. O. Leclerc, University of
States Comparative Insights from Finland and University, Israel Lyon, France
France. A. Rosin, University of Turku,
The New State Repression of Low-Wage Finland The protection of collective labour Enforcing individual employment rights:
Workers? Antitrust Liability for conditions under the Transfer of Where does the power lie? N. Busby
Concerted Action by Independent Vulnerable workers in times of crisis: the Undertaking Directive. I. van Hiel, and E. Rose, University of Strathclyde,
Contractors. S. Paul, University of youth employment in Portugal. T. University of Ghent, Belgium United Kingdom
California, United States Coelho Moreira, University of Minho
Law School, Portugal Trans-Atlantic versus Trans-Pacific: the
Labor Rights Impact of Proposed FTAs.
Precarious work, gender and non- M.S. Weiss, University of Maryland
discrimination: South Africa and region, Carey, United States
N. Smit, North-West University, and E.
Fourie, University of Johannesburg,
South Africa
28SATURDAY 09:00 – 10:30 PANEL SESSION 7
Track 5 Mini Symposium I Mini Symposium III Mini Symposium IV
Room C1.17 Room F2.01C Room F0.02 Room A0.08
Roundtable: Proliferation of The role of private actors in the
Regulation of privacy in employment enforcement mechanisms adjudication and enforcement of Social protection for unprotected
concerning fundamental labor rights: public law in the workplace: workers 2
The more the better? exploring comparative and
theoretical perspectives
Chair: T. Yonezu, University of Chuo, Chair: P. van der Heijden, Leiden Chairs: S. Corby, University of Chair: M. Westerveld, University of
Tokyo University, the Netherlands Greenwich, United Kingdom; and D. Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Comandè, Università Degli Studi di
Discussant: T. Katsabian, Hebrew Speakers: Milano, Italy New Paradigm for Social Insurance:
University of Jerusalem, Israel K. Boonstra, VU University Amsterdam New Wine or New Bottles? S. Yamada,
/ FNV Workers Union, the Netherlands Theorizing the role of a broader range of Hiroshima Shudo University, Japan
Notice, Consent, and Non-Consent: private actors in the public enforcement
Employee Privacy in the Restatement. N. Bruun, University of Helsinki, Finland of statutory rights. M. Dias-Abey, Workers’ Compensation in Transition
S.L. Willborn, University of Nebraska, Queen’s University, Canada China: Why eliminating self-insurance
United States L. Compa, Cornell University, United elements are relevant? L. Mankui,
States What can we learn from comparative Southwest University of Political
The right to privacy in employment: In research on the role of trade unions in Science and Law, China
search of the European model of B. Langille, University of Toronto, the adjudication of individual
protection. M. Otto, CRIMT, Canada Canada employment rights claims? E. Shilton, Social Protection Coverage for Informal
Queen’s University, Canada Workers in Malaysia. L. Miles,
Data Protection meets Labour Law: Two S. Sciarra, Italian Consitutional Court / Middlesex University, United Kingdom
Ships Passing in the Night? P. Roth, University of Florence, Italy Labour Arbitration: Achieving Timely
University of Otago, New Zealand and Effective Dispute Resolution in a Informal Employment and Social
Radically Changed Environment. K. Security Protection in China:
Banks, Queen’s University, Canada Enhancement of Collective Bargain and
the New Instrumental Impact to Labor
Market. W. Qian and H. Junling,
Peking University Law School, China
29SATURDAY 11:00 – 12:30 PANEL SESSION 8
General Conference Track Track 1 Track 2 Track 3
Room C1.17 Room A0.08 Room C2.23 Room C0.17
Closing the employment standards The right to strike and collective Trade unions (or lack thereof) and
enforcement gap: case studies from Agency work bargaining with regard to the EU- labour law
Ontario framework
Convener: E. Tucker, Osgoode Hall Chair: M. Houwerzijl, Tilburg Chair: M.A. García-Muñoz Alhambra, Chair: S. Estreicher, New York
Law School, Canada University, The Netherlands University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain University, United States
Discussant: TBA Telework as an instrument of enhance Justifications of the right to strike: from Trade Union Enforcement of Labour
competitiveness of European the rule of force to the rule of law. P. Standards. J. Howe, I. Landau and T.
The Employment Standards companies – comparative legal study of Grzebyk, University of Warsaw, Poland Hardy, Melbourne Law School,
Enforcement Gap and the Overtime Pay Poland and Germany. A. Ludera- Australia
Exemption in Ontario. L.F. Vosko (York Ruszel, University of Rzeszow, Poland Collective Autonomy under the Scrutiny
University); E. Tucker; M. Steedman of the Court of Justice of the European Comparative implications of sociological
(Laurentian University); E. Siemiatycki Who benefits from the law? Reminisces Union: Some Notes. O. Razzolini, analysis of the UK's individualized
(York University); A. Noack (Ryerson from fieldwork on contract (agency) University of Genova, Italy labour and equality rights regime. E.M.
University); J. Grundy (Wildrid Laurier workers in India. P. Kumar, Jawaharlal Barmes, Queen Mary University of
University); M. Gellatly (Parkdale Nehru University, India Empty hopes related to the article 152 London, United Kingdom
Community Legal Services); E. Leinveer of the Lisbon Treaty or…should we take
(Osgoode Hall Law School); M. Thomas Equal pay for agency workers – the the potential of EU social dialogue Bidvest and beyond: legal and political
(York University) Hungarian experience. G. Kártyás, seriously? B. Surdykowska, NSZZ challenges to organising across the
Pázmány Péter Catholic Univeristy, Solidarność, Poland value chain in South Africa. E. Fergus
Vulnerable Workers and Empowered Hungary and S. Godfrey, University of Cape
Claimants: Shifting Subjects of Industrial relations in EU institutions. On Town, South Africa
Regulation in Ontario’s Employment As iron sharpens iron (can a legal the added value of the CFREU. F.
Standards Enforcement Regime. A. Hall system sharpen another?) A Dorssemont, Université Catholique de Establishing the Right to Bargain
(Memorial University); L.F. Vosko; J. comparative assessment of different Louvain, Belgium Collectively in Australia and the United
Grundy; E. Siemiatyki; and R. Hall approaches to regulate agency work in Kingdom. A. Forsyth, RMIT University
(York University) Italy and Australia. M.A. Tranfaglia, and J. Howe, University of Melbourne,
Melbourne University, Australia Australia
Access to and Remedies in the
Enforcement of Ontario’s Employment
Standards Act: The Impact of Reforms.
J. Grundy, A.M. Noack, L.F. Vosko and
R. Hii (Ryerson University)
30You can also read
