Inflation, Rising Rates and Their Impact on Infrastructure - March 2021
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVES March 2021 Inflation, Rising Rates and Their Impact on Infrastructure Key Takeaways f Rising rates and accompanying inflation will have little impact on valuations of regulated assets in the medium to longer term if inflation can be directly or indirectly passed through to customers. f User-pays assets typically see cash flows increase if there is a cyclical upswing in growth and interest rates, with increasing valuations more than offsetting the impact of a rising cost of capital. f There appears to be little to no correlation between various infrastructure assets and inflation over the past 30 years. Following on from the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, central banks and governments have aggressively stimulated their economies. The likely result of this aggressive stimulus is rising inflation and accelerating global growth. Investors need to prepare for a world of rising yields after a long period of structural decline. For infrastructure, in contrast to conventional wisdom, such a scenario need not be feared, but rather understood and managed. The impact of rising yields depends on whether they are in response to the cycle or whether they represent a more fundamental structural change. Different types of companies also react very differently. The impact of rising rates depends on the reason for that increase. It also depends on the type of asset. We distinguish between: • Regulated assets, where revenues are normally determined by a return on an underlying asset base, which is in turn determined by the level of investment. The details of the way in which returns are set vary widely between assets. The main difference, though, relates to whether prices and the assets are index linked, and cash returns based on a real cost of capital (with examples in the U.K., Australia), or whether the regulator looks at nominal assets and grants a nominal return. • User-pays assets, where control of prices for transport assets is usually set out in a contract agreed at the time of grant of the concession, with volume risk (traffic, passenger, container, etc.) borne by the operator. Other infrastructure (e.g., communications) often has long-term contracts that include price escalation.
INFLATION, RISING RATES AND THEIR IMPACT ON INFRASTRUCTURE Regulated Assets User-Pays Assets One of the most important characteristics of regulated User-pays assets behave very differently from assets is returns allowed by regulators will depend on regulated utilities: how interest rates and the cost of capital develop in • They typically have greater exposure to GDP the future. If interest rates rise, in order to facilitate growth. Cash flows increase if there is a cyclical future funding of capital investment, regulators need upswing in growth and interest rates, with to increase the allowed returns. Such increases do not increasing valuations more than offsetting the happen immediately, and may not happen automatically, impact of a rising cost of capital. but there is a process by which over the medium term regulated returns should rise and fall in line with rises and • Their long-term cash flows for existing assets do not falls in the cost of capital (which can be assumed to relate normally respond to changes in interest rates or the to interest rates). The precise way this is done differs cost of capital. This means that valuations at an exit between countries: date respond negatively to increases in long-term interest rates. The negative impact will be higher • In countries where there is a regular reset of prices (e.g., the longer the duration of the asset. the U.K. and Australia), the regulator conducts a review of the appropriate cost of capital at the time of the reset • The behavior depends crucially on whether and uses this in the price control determination. While assets have returns linked to an inflation index. the cost of capital determination may deviate (positively Under scenarios where growth increases, inflation or negatively) from the underlying cost of capital, over increases, and real rates decline, index-linked assets time it can be expected to match investors’ required will demonstrate strong positive returns. Assets not returns and directly pass through inflation. linked to an inflation index would underperform. • In other countries, companies need to apply for While rising rates due to increased growth permission to increase rates (e.g., the U.S. and Canada). expectations would be a positive to both user- In these systems, the appropriate regulatory authority pays assets and regulated utilities, what about will also make an assessment of the cost of capital or rising inflation? cost of equity and use this in the determination. Again, changes in the cost of capital will in the medium term be Case Study 1: The Impact of Inflation reflected in the prices that the company can charge and on European Utilities so in essence these assets are also able to pass through While regulations in different countries in Europe higher costs that may occur from rising inflation. have various technical differences, in essence they The requirement for a regulator to offer reasonable are designed to protect the remunerations utilities returns is usually established in the legal framework receive for capital investment against macroeconomic supporting the operation of the utility or other asset changes, which include inflation. owner. This means that: Nonetheless, there is one major difference within the • Investors can expect that changes in interest rates will sector: whether allowed returns (i.e., the weighted be reflected in future cash flows over the medium and average cost of capital or WACC) are set in nominal longer term. As a result, the underlying asset value at terms (as in Spain, Portugal, Czech Republic and an assumed investment exit date in the medium term Poland) or real terms (as in the U.K., Italy, Sweden is likely to be relatively independent of interest rates. and Hungary). This is because any changes to the rate used to discount WACC and Allowed Return Set in Nominal Terms future cash flows will be offset by changes in cash flows If the WACC is set in nominal terms, the regulated set by the regulator. asset base (RAB) and total capital and operating • Changes in interest rates and inflation in the shorter expenditure allowances are quoted by the regulator in term will have an impact on valuations of regulated nominal terms. Annual fluctuations in inflation have no utilities, and the impact will depend on the mechanism impact on the allowed revenue. and timing by which changes in these variables are Such companies are viewed as beneficiaries of low reflected in cash flows (or not). inflation: if inflation stays depressed, asset owners In summary, rising rates and accompanying inflation will may be overcompensated in the regulated cash have little impact on valuations of regulated assets in flows to cover cost inflation in capital and operating the medium to longer term if inflation can be directly or expenditures (due to allowances set in nominal terms), indirectly passed through to customers. and vice versa, during the period. 2
INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVES March 2021 However, the lower nominal bond yields resulting from a customer bills to reflect the increase. However, what is low inflation rate would be factored into the regulator’s crucial is that utilities increase their rates to customers at return allowance in the next WACC review, and vice versa. or around inflation over the medium to longer term. For instance, for electricity networks in Spain, the nominal One area where rising inflation may potentially benefit WACC allowance for 2020–26 is based on observations of utilities is the impact on allowed returns. Assuming nominal bond rates (which embody the inflation trend) real interest rates are unchanged, higher inflation over 2012–17 during the review process in 2018–19. leads to higher nominal interest rates, which is the In other words, allowed returns allow for the pass-through benchmark utility regulators refer to in determining a of inflation, albeit with a time lag of a few years. utility’s allowed return on equity (ROE). The higher the WACC and Allowed Return Set in Real Terms nominal interest rate, generally the higher allowed ROE. If the WACC is set in real terms, parameters such as RAB In some instances, the allowed ROE is formulaically and total capital and operating expenditures are typically tied to certain interest rate benchmarks. For example, estimated and approved by the regulator in real terms Ameren’s Illinois electric utility has allowed ROEs that using forecast inflation for any regulatory period. The are annually adjusted to be 570 basis points (bps) returns permitted by the regulator (allowed returns) above the 30-year U.S. Treasury rate. Another example are then adjusted annually by actual inflation when is Edison International’s electric utility, where the 10.3% determining the regulatory cash flow and asset base, i.e., allowed ROE gets adjusted up or down if the Moody’s they are passed through to the customer through higher Bond Utility BAA Yield moves more than 100 bps over a rates, maybe with a lag of a few months. rolling 12-month period. Consequently, if inflation in a given year within a regulatory Having said that, history shows that allowed ROEs period trends higher than the regulator’s forecast before have been quite sticky (Exhibit 1), and regulators have the start of the period, there is a momentary boost to the tended to be quite slow in adjusting the allowed ROEs cash flow compensation, and vice versa. in response to falling bond yields. As such, in a rising bond yield environment it is difficult to see regulators Such companies are viewed as beneficiaries of high inflation. increasing ROEs until they believe asset owners are not However, taking a more holistic view over the regulatory being fairly compensated and funding future growth period, if high inflation sustains for multiple years, it is has become too expensive. As context, the industry taken into consideration by the regulator’s assumption average allowed ROE remains healthy in the 9%–10% heading into the next price review, thereby driving down range, despite years of falling rates. In an environment the real bond rate allowance embedded in the allowed where there is a need to continue incentivizing clean return. The impact on the asset cash flows from inflation- energy investments and strong public policy support, related drivers gets averaged out over the long term. we expect ROEs to remain fairly sticky. In addition, companies may have mechanisms to further Exhibit 1: Allowed Returns Slow to Adjust moderate the sensitivity to inflation, such as using to Falling Bond Yields inflation-linked bonds as part of their borrowings. The higher the proportion of debt being inflation-linked, the 20% more muted the short-term effects from inflation shocks are on the cash flows. 15% Case Study 2: The Impact of Inflation on North American Utilities 10% Fundamentally, North American utilities are insulated from rising or falling inflation because customer rates are 5% regulated under a cost-of-service methodology. Under this model, utilities are not only able to earn a return on their invested capital (for example, investment in 0% poles and wires), but they are also able to pass through 1984 1991 1998 2005 2012 2019 expenses to the customer (for example, maintenance, Allowed ROE taxes, fuel, etc.), subject to approval by the regulator. 10- Year Government Bond Yield When there is inflation and costs are rising, utilities can file a rate case proceeding with the regulator to ask for As of Dec. 31, 2020. Source: ClearBridge Investments, Bloomberg Finance. 3
INFLATION, RISING RATES AND THEIR IMPACT ON INFRASTRUCTURE Case Study 3: The Impact of Inflation 3. Midstream companies that have non-contracted on North American Pipelines volumes/marketing arms benefit directly by selling In the case of North American midstream pipelines, the product at higher prices. impact of inflation varies depending on the nature of Case Study 4: The Impact of Inflation the commercial agreement that underpins pipeline on North American Renewables assets (Exhibit 2). Overall inflationary forces have muted valuation impact Exhibit 2: Commercial Underpinning of Pipeline Assets on global renewables. While renewables companies are largely being compensated through 10-year–20-year fixed 100% power purchase prices or partially inflating agreements, the returns assumed within these agreements tend 75% to have long-term inflation assumptions embedded. 50% Essentially, this means that while there is no explicit pass- through of inflation through the pricing, a pass-through 25% is implicit when the contract is written and more often than not the contract will contain buffers for instances 0% like rising inflation. For example, renewables companies Enbridge TC Energy Williams Cheniere Gibson secure growth from their development pipelines, where fixed-price contracts for the operational stage of assets Uncontracted are negotiated based on current market conditions. Fee for Service Take or Pay, without Escalators Meanwhile, technology is driving cost deflation, Take or Pay, with Escalators preserving or expanding margins for renewables Reg ulated Cos t of Service companies. Automation and software have translated to lowering operations and maintenance costs (the largest As of Feb. 28, 2021. Source: ClearBridge Investments, Bloomberg Finance. contributors to costs), and companies largely expect technology to continue to bring costs down. Bloomberg Pipeline companies that operate long-haul transmission New Energy Finance forecasts capital costs in renewable networks tend to have the highest level of inflation energy to continue to come down through 2050. For protection as they operate under a cost-of-service example, solar photovoltaics are expected to see an methodology or have long-term take-or-pay contracts annualized 3% decline through 2030. with annual escalators embedded in their terms. For example, Enbridge’s Lakehead System (the U.S. portion Case Study 5: The Impact of Inflation on Toll Roads of the Liquids Mainline System), has rates that are either Rights to operate toll roads are typically granted under indexed to PPI or cost-of-service, while the Canadian a concession and as such usually have a finite life. Mainline (the Canadian portion of the Liquids Mainline Concession deeds define the parameters under which System) has tariffs that are a function of GDP. Enbridge’s the toll road may operate, and, in most cases, this gas transmission assets, such as the Texas Eastern stipulates how toll prices may be increased. Generally, network, have recently gone through a rate case to toll price increases are linked to inflation; however, there redetermine rates to reflect cost inflation, among other are a number of variations, including: items, which resulted in an earnings uplift. Those midstream assets that work under a fixed-fee • Full inflation pass-through (e.g., the Westlink M7 take-or-pay contract (such as Gibson Energy’s oil sands in Sydney) storage tanks) or fee-for-service model (such as Williams’s • Partial inflation pass-through (e.g., main French and gathering and processing infrastructure) are more Italian toll roads’ usual 0.7x CPI) exposed to inflation. To the extent that higher inflation is a product of higher • Inflation pass-through with a floor (e.g., WestConnex commodity prices, that would generally be positive for in Sydney has greater of CPI or 4% until 2040) midstream companies from the following perspectives: • No inflation linkage (e.g., 407 ETR in Toronto and I-95 in 1. Higher commodity prices mean healthier E&P Virginia are free to set tolls subject to constraints) counterparties/customers. Here we illustrate the sensitivity of toll road valuations to 2. Higher prices may lead to more E&P activity, which may changes in inflation according to different pass-through mean more infrastructure/growth capex is required. scenarios (Exhibit 3). 4
INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVES March 2021 Exhibit 3: Valuation Sensitivity of Toll Roads to Inflation • Concessions with no inflation linkage will typically 135% mean valuations are affected more by traffic congestion and thus economic conditions. 125% As such, inflation is typically passed through, making V aluation Sensitiv ity to CPI Change f rom 2.5% toll road valuations less sensitive to nominal bond rate changes where this is driven by increases in inflation. 115% Toll road valuations are, however, very sensitive to changes in real bond rates without an increase in 105% inflation, thus increasing discount rates without the benefit of inflation-driven increases in cash flows. 95% It is also worth noting that, often, inflation occurs at times of increased economic activity, which typically results in increased traffic levels, further offsetting impacts of 85% inflation from a valuation perspective. 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 1.0x CPI Pass Through 0.7x CPI Pass Through Case Study 6: The Impact of Inflation on Airports Toll Floor at 2.5% Airports are typically regulated to some degree, and as such inflation sensitivity somewhat depends on As of Feb. 28, 2021. Source: ClearBridge Investments, Bloomberg Finance. the regulatory model of the airport. Most airports are Assumes real rates remain constant and inflation change impacts nominal bond rates. dual-till, where aeronautical activities are regulated and non-aeronautical activities (sometimes referred to as The differences in inflation pass-throughs outlined above commercial activities) are not. tend to drive the following outcomes: In general, both revenue streams can pass through • Full inflation pass-through will lead to limited sensitivity. inflation increases, although how this occurs varies: • Aeronautical: Typically, regulators set an allowed • Partial inflation pass-through will lead to increased return that regulated airport activities can earn. This sensitivity, albeit costs are typically fixed and increase allowed return is usually set for a period of five years with inflation, providing for improving EBITDA margins and includes an estimate of inflation. Increases or with traffic growth (historically this is why partial inflation decreases in the outlook for inflation are incorporated pass-through exists, as inflation is achieved after costs). at the next five-year reset and flow through into • Floor price increases mean valuations are sensitive below regulated prices. Additionally, when setting prices the inflation floor. When inflation is decreasing, valuation for five years, price increases are often set as CPI+x, increases and vice versa. meaning prices are adjusted each year with inflation. Exhibit 4: Dual-Till Regulation for Airports 5
INFLATION, RISING RATES AND THEIR IMPACT ON INFRASTRUCTURE Exhibit 5: Dual-Till Airports Can Pass Through Inflation SYD - Real Price Changes 15% 10% 5% 0% - 5% - 10% 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 CAGR 2003- 2019 Aeronautica l Commercial As of Feb. 28, 2021. Source: ClearBridge Investments, Bloomberg Finance. As such, aeronautical activities can be exposed to • Passenger Volume: The other key consideration inflation risk for up to five years, but in many cases have in an airport’s ability to pass on inflation effects is inflation linkages in actual pricing decisions. passenger volumes, given that most revenue streams • Non-aeronautical: Commercial revenues are usually reflect the number of passengers multiplied by price. negotiated between airports and customers. As such, As such, ticket price changes can have effects on short-term exposure to inflation is often dictated by travel affordability and thus passenger numbers. contractual terms, while longer-term exposure is dictated Over the last 50 years, airline ticket prices have fallen by bargaining power. Historically airport revenues have in real terms often in combination with increases in been able to achieve inflation via passenger increases on disposable income, stimulating travel demand. To the passenger-related activities such as retail and parking. extent airline ticket price trends change, this will also Property revenue increases have often been above have an impact on headline revenue. inflation given the scarce nature of airport land. Using Sydney Airports as an example, the real price Many other factors also influence an airport’s ability to change in commercial activities has increased by 1.1% pass on price increases, including: annually since 2003, while aeronautical has increased by • Passenger Mix: Increases in high-spending 1.9% annually over the same period (Exhibit 5). passenger groups such as Chinese tourists influence revenue outcomes. The Response of Listed Infrastructure Equities to Inflation • Foreign Exchange (FX) Rates: This is typically passed through immediately in short-term spending rates as Using North America and Europe as a case study, we most travelers have a budget in their home currency have gone back 30 years and looked at the correlation and their spending adjusts immediately with changes of infrastructure assets to both core and headline in FX. FX rates are often influenced by the relevant inflation. Unsurprisingly and as we have discussed country bond rate expectations, which are also above, correlations have little, if any, linear relationship influenced by inflation. (Exhibit 6).1 Exhibit 6: Little Correlation Between Inflation and Infrastructure Share Prices Europe North America CPI All 30-Year Core CPI 30-Year CPI All 30-Year Core CPI 30-Year Water 0.09 Water 0.10 Energy Infrastructure 0.27 Electric 0.11 Airports 0.08 Toll Roads 0.04 Rail 0.27 Rail 0.07 Gas -0.01 Gas -0.04 Communications 0.19 Water -0.03 Toll Roads -0.09 Airports -0.09 Electric 0.15 Energy Infrastructure -0.02 Electric -0.16 Electric -0.17 Gas 0.14 Gas -0.03 Water -0.03 Communications -0.27 As of Feb. 28, 2021. Source: ClearBridge Investments. 6
INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVES March 2021 Growth-Driven Rising Rates a Boon for 1 Some observations and considerations: communications companies in North America only have a data set back to 2007, and idiosyncratic Infrastructure, While Inflation is a Pass-Through drivers such as rapid early cycle growth and conversion to REIT A look at how the effects of rising interest rates and structures have to be considered when looking at correlations. Energy inflation on infrastructure assets shows that while rising prices, one of the key differences (with food) between headline and core rates due to increased growth expectations would have inflation, increase the correlation of North American infrastructure, most notably in user-pays and energy infrastructure assets. Underlying asset a positive impact on both utility and user-pays assets, regulation, concession structure or contracting profile may also make rising inflation has been an ongoing concern for the a difference in the way user-pays and utility assets behave. Market- market. What is clear from the above analysis is that specific valuation techniques will also likely skew the relationship over inflation is a pass-through, directly or indirectly, for short periods of time. For example, the North American markets focus on infrastructure assets and so will have a limited impact P/E ratios, while the European markets put greater focus on long-term cash flow valuation measures such as EV/RAB. Bond yields and inflation on valuations. Moreover, looking at correlations of around the world have been falling for the past 40 years. various infrastructure assets to inflation over the past 30 years, there appears to be little to no relationship. About the Author Shane Hurst Managing Director, Portfolio Manager • 23 years of investment industry experience • Joined ClearBridge in 2010 • Master of Commerce (Advanced Finance) from the University of New South Wales • Bachelor of Business from the University of Technology Sydney Definitions A basis point (bps) is one one-hundredth of one percentage point (1/100% or 0.01%). COVID-19 is the World Health Organization’s official designation of the current novel coronavirus disease. EV / EBITDA equals a company’s enterprise value The virus causing the novel coronavirus disease is divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, known as SARS¬CoV-2. and amortization. It measures the price (in the form of enterprise value) an investor pays for the benefit of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is an economic statistic the company’s cash flow (in the form of EBITDA). which measures the market value of all final goods and services produced within a country in a given period of Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) measure the average time. change in consumer prices over time in a fixed market basket of goods and services. Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is a calculation of a firm’s cost of capital in which each Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) invest in real category of capital (i.e. common stock, preferred estate or loans secured by real estate and issue shares stocks bonds, other long-term debt) is proportionately in such investments, which can be illiquid. weighted. Return on Equity (ROE) is the amount of net income returned as a percentage of shareholders equity. Return on equity measures a corporation’s profitability by revealing how much profit a company generates with the money shareholders have invested. ROE is expressed as a percentage and calculated as: Return on Equity = Net Income/Shareholder’s Equity. 7
INFLATION, RISING RATES AND THEIR IMPACT ON INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT ARE THE RISKS? Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index. Unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges. Equity securities are subject to price fluctuation and possible loss of principal. Fixed-income securities involve interest rate, credit, inflation and reinvestment risks; and possible loss of principal. As interest rates rise, the value of fixed income securities falls. International investments are subject to special risks including currency fluctua- tions, social, economic and political uncertainties, which could increase volatility. These risks are magnified in emerging markets. Commodities and currencies contain heightened risk that include market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions and may not be suitable for all investors. U.S. Treasuries are direct debt obligations issued and backed by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. The U.S. government guarantees the principal and interest payments on U.S. Treasuries when the securities are held to maturity. Unlike U.S. Treasuries, debt securities issued by the federal agencies and instrumentalities and related investments may or may not be backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. Even when the U.S. government guarantees principal and interest payments on securities, this guarantee does not apply to losses resulting from declines in the market value of these securities. Any companies and/or case studies referenced herein are used solely for illustrative purposes; any investment may or may not be currently held by any portfolio advised by Franklin Templeton. The information provided is not a recommendation or individual investment advice for any particular security, strategy, or investment product and is not an indication of the trading intent of any Franklin Templeton managed portfolio. 8
IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton (“FT”) has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user. Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction. Issued in the U.S. by Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc., One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403- 1906, (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236, franklintempleton.com—Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. is the principal distributor of Franklin Templeton U.S. registered products, which are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed and are available only in jurisdictions where an offer or solicitation of such products is permitted under applicable laws and regulation. Australia: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments Australia Limited (ABN 87 006 972 247) (Australian Financial Services License Holder No. 225328), Level 19, 101 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000 / Austria/Germany: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Services GmbH, Frankfurt, Mainzer Landstr. 16, 60325 Frankfurt/Main, Tel 08 00/0 73 80 01 (Germany), 08 00/29 59 11 (Austria), Fax +49(0)69/2 72 23-120, info@franklintempleton.de, info@franklintempleton.at / Canada: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., 200 King Street West, Suite 1500 Toronto, ON, M5H3T4, Fax (416) 364-1163, (800) 387-0830, www.franklintempleton.ca / Netherlands: Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l., Dutch Branch, World Trade Center Amsterdam, H-Toren, 5e verdieping, Zuidplein 36, 1077 XV Amsterdam, Netherlands. Tel +31 (0) 20 575 2890 / United Arab Emirates: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (ME) Limited, authorized and regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority. Dubai office: Franklin Templeton, The Gate, East Wing, Level 2, Dubai International Financial Centre, P.O. Box 506613, Dubai, U.A.E., Tel +9714-4284100, Fax +9714-4284140 / France: Issued by Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l., French branch., 20 rue de la Paix, 75002 Paris France / Hong Kong: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited, 17/F, Chater House, 8 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong / Italy: Issued by Franklin Templeton International Services S.à.r.l.—Italian Branch, Corso Italia, 1—Milan, 20122, Italy / Japan: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments Japan Limited / Korea: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Trust Management Co., Ltd., 3rd fl., CCMM Building, 12 Youido-Dong, Youngdungpo-Gu, Seoul, Korea 150-968 / Luxembourg/Benelux: Issued by Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l.—Supervised by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier–8A, rue Albert Borschette, L-1246 Luxembourg, Tel +352-46 66 67-1, Fax +352-46 66 76 / Malaysia: Issued by Franklin Templeton Asset Management (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. & Franklin Templeton GSC Asset Management Sdn. Bhd / Poland: Issued by Templeton Asset Management (Poland) TFI S.A.; Rondo ONZ 1; 00-124 Warsaw / Romania: Franklin Templeton International Services S.À R.L. Luxembourg, Bucharest Branch, at 78-80 Buzesti Str, Premium Point, 8th Floor, Bucharest 1, 011017, Romania. Registered with Romania Financial Supervisory Authority under no. PJM07.1AFIASMDLUX0037/10 March 2016 and authorized and regulated in Luxembourg by Commission de Surveillance du Secture Financiere. Telephone: + 40 21 200 9600 / Singapore: Issued by Templeton Asset Management Ltd. Registration No. (UEN) 199205211E. 7 Temasek Boulevard, #38-03 Suntec Tower One, 038987, Singapore / Spain: Issued by Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l.—Spanish Branch, Professional of the Financial Sector under the Supervision of CNMV, José Ortega y Gasset 29, Madrid, Spain. Tel +34 91 426 3600, Fax +34 91 577 1857 / South Africa: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments SA (PTY) Ltd which is an authorised Financial Services Provider. Tel +27 (21) 831 7400, Fax +27 (21) 831 7422 / Switzerland: Issued by Franklin Templeton Switzerland Ltd, Stockerstrasse 38, CH-8002 Zurich / UK: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited (FTIML), registered office: Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London EC4N 6HL, Tel +44 (0)20 7073 8500. Authorized and regulated in the United Kingdom by the Financial Conduct Authority / Nordic regions: Issued by Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l., Contact details: Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l., Swedish Branch, filial, Nybrokajen 5, SE-111 48, Stockholm, Sweden. Tel +46 (0)8 545 012 30, nordicinfo@franklintempleton.com, authorised in the Luxembourg by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier to conduct certain financial activities in Denmark, in Sweden, in Norway, in Iceland and in Finland. Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l., Swedish Branch, filial conducts activities under supervision of Finansinspektionen in Sweden / Offshore Americas: In the U.S., this publication is made available only to financial intermediaries by Templeton/Franklin Investment Services, 100 Fountain Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716. Tel (800) 239-3894 (USA Toll-Free), (877) 389-0076 (Canada Toll-Free), and Fax (727) 299-8736. Investments are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed. Distribution outside the U.S. may be made by Templeton Global Advisors Limited or other sub-distributors, intermediaries, dealers or professional investors that have been engaged by Templeton Global Advisors Limited to distribute shares of Franklin Templeton funds in certain jurisdictions. This is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase securities in any jurisdiction where it would be illegal to do so. Please visit www.franklinresources.com to be directed to your local Franklin Templeton website. Copyright © 2021 Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved. 0321
You can also read