HORIZON BREXIT: THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF FP/H2020 PARTICIPATION AND THEIR ECONOMIC IMPACT

Page created by Patrick Johnston
 
CONTINUE READING
HORIZON BREXIT: THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF FP/H2020 PARTICIPATION AND THEIR ECONOMIC IMPACT
HORIZON BREXIT:
THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF FP/H2020 PARTICIPATION
AND THEIR ECONOMIC IMPACT

     Nicola Francesco DOTTI, André SPITHOVEN and Walter YSEBAERT (VUB)

                        10/Dec/2018 JRC Workshop on
     "Perceptions and personal attitudes across the European public opinion”
WHAT IS THE REGIONAL ECONOMIC
IMPACT   OF  BREXIT   ON  THE
FP/H2020?

                                2
OUTLINE

1. INTRODUCTION

2. THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF FP/H2020 PARTICIPATION

3. BREXIT & THE FUTURE ‘HORIZON EUROPE’

4. REGIONAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS ON THE UK AND BELGIUM

5. CONCLUSIONS

                                                        3
THE CASE OF FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME/H2020

INTRODUCTION

                                        4
THE EU FRAMEWORK PROGRAMMES (FP)
THE STARTING POINT: A COMPETITIVE, SPACE-BLIND RATIONALE

         SINCE 1984, THE EU SELECTS AND FUNDS
      ‘EXCELLENT’ TRANSNATIONAL R&D+I PROJECTS,
 WHEREVER THEY COME FROM ACROSS EUROPE (AND BEYOND).

                                                           5
ON THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF RDI ACTIVITIES
3 FACTS AS BACKGROUND

1. R&D+I ACTIVITIES ARE UNEVENLY DISTRIBUTED ACROSS SPACE

2. GROWING IMPORTANCE OF TRANSNATIONAL FLOWS
   (e.g. FP partnerships, Erasmus, co-authorships et al.)

3. KNOWLEDGE DYNAMICS ARE CUMULATIVE

                                                            6
THE CASE OF FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME/H2020

THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION
OF FP/H2020 PARTICIPATION

                                        7
THE EU INTERVENTION
FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME VS COHESION POLICY
   TERRITORIAL INNOVATIVENESS

                                                           FRAMEWORK PROGRAMMES
                                                                /HORIZON 2020

                                                                                                                           ENHANCEMENT

                                                                                                                             ACTIVITIES
                                                                                                                              OF R&D
                                COHESION
                                 POLICY
                                                           REGIONAL CONVERGENCE

                                                                                     TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT
                                                     [Source: Dotti, N. F., and Spithoven, A. (2018)
                                   Economic drivers and specialization patterns in the spatial distribution of Framework
                                    Programme's participation. Papers in Regional Science, doi: 10.1111/pirs.12299]                       8
OUR APPROACH AND METHOD
(CF. DOTTI AND SPITHOVEN, 2018)

                              ASSUMPTION
      FP PARTICIPATION AS INDICATOR OF SCIENTIFIC COMPETITIVENESS
                   (ONE OF THE POSSIBLE INDICATORS…)

                              METHOD
             ZERO-INFLATED NEGATIVE BINOMIAL REGRESSION

                                UNITS
                 ANALYSIS OF NUTS3 EUROPEAN REGIONS
                     (EU+ASSOCIATED COUNTRIES)

                             TIMESPAN
                      FROM FP5 TO F7 (1999-2010)

                                                                    9
SELECTED FINDINGS
(CF. DOTTI AND SPITHOVEN, 2018)

                                      (1)

         FP PARTICIPATIONS FOLLOW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:
     RICH REGIONS GET MORE, GROWING REGIONS INCREASE THEIR
                           PARTICIPATION

                                      (2)

  FP5 PARTICIPATION HAS POSITIVE INFLUENCE ON FP7 PARTICIPATION,
REGARDLESS THEMES (=CUMULATIVE DYNAMICS OF KNOWLEDGE+CROSSDISCIPLINARY SPILLOVER)

                                      (3)

         LIMITED OR NO INTERACTIONS WITH COHESION POLICY
                         (DUE TO TIME LAGS)

                                                                                    10
WHEN THE TOP-PERFORMER LEAVE THE COMPETITION
THE IMPACT OF BREXIT ON FP/HORIZON2020

                                               11
FP/H2020,                                    ?
A ‘SURPRISING’ MISSING CHAPTER                        ?
OF BREXIT NEGOTIATIONS
                                     ?

                                                 ?
                                 ?               ?
                                         ?
                                                      ?

                                     ?
                                         ?

                                                     12
THE CASE OF THE UK
THE TOP-PERFORMING MEMBER STATE

          NET CONTRIBUTION            H2020 FUNDING              BALANCE
  MS      TO THE EU BUDGET            (AVERAGE 2014-2016,         (FUNDING –
           (AVERAGE 2014-2016)    EXCL. ASSOCIATED COUNTRIES)   CONTRIBUTION)
UK               12.9%                      16.4%                   3.5%
NL               5.3%                        8.4%                   3.1%
ES               8.1%                        9.5%                   1.4%
EL               1.2%                        2.3%                   1.0%
BE               4.2%                        5.2%                   1.0%
   […]
RO               1.1%                        0.4%                  -0.7%
PL               3.1%                        1.0%                  -2.1%
DE               20.5%                      18.0%                  -2.5%
IT               12.0%                       8.6%                  -3.4%
FR               15.8%                      11.1%                  -4.7%

                                                                            13
HORIZON BREXIT
THE KEY ISSUE

          WITH BREXIT, THE MOST COMPETITIVE MEMBER STATE
   MIGHT BE EXCLUDED FROM THE COMPETITION FOR FP/H2020 FUNDING

                                        =

     ?          RE-DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET INCOME OF THE UK
                    [ABOUT 3,5% OF THE FP/H2020 BUDGET TO EU27]
                                                                  ?
                                        +

     THE EC PROPOSAL TO INCREASE THE BUDGET OF HORIZON EUROPE

                                                                      14
WHAT HAPPEN WHEN THE TOP-PERFORMER LEAVE THE COMPETITION
IMPACTS ON THE UK AND BELGIUM

                                                           15
HORIZON EUROPE AFTER BREXIT
3 POSSIBLE SCENARIOS

               POST-BREXIT
SCENARIO                              EFFECT ON THE UK                   EFFECT ON EU-27
               AGREEMENT

                             KEEP CURRENT STATUS                MS GIVE ~3,5% OF H/EUROPE
   A       FULL MEMBERSHIP
                             (NET INCOME FROM H/EUROPE +3,5%)   TO A NON-MS

                                                                REDISTRIBUTION OF ~3,5%
   B       “ASSOCIATION”     PAY ONLY ITS PARTICIPATION
                                                                OF HORIZON EUROPE BUDGET

           EXCLUSION/                                           REDISTRIBUTION OF ~3,5%
   C                         NO/LIMITED PARTICIPATION
           THIRD COUNTRY                                        OF HORIZON EUROPE BUDGET

                                                                                            16
ESTIMATING THE IMPACT ON BRITISH REGIONS
NUTS          REGION             H2020 CONTRIBUTION             ESTIMATIONS FOR HORIZON EUROPE
                                  (YEARLY AVERAGE)                       AFTER BREXIT
                                MIO EUROS        SHARE        SCENARIO A     SCENARIO B     SCENARIO C
UKC    North East (England)         36            0,4%            45              45             ~0
UKD    North West (England)         79            1,0%            99              99             ~0
       Yorkshire and The
UKE    Humber                       78            1,0%           97            97              ~0
UKF    East Midlands (England)      99            1,2%           123           123             ~0
UKG    West Midlands (England)      85            1,0%           107           107             ~0
UKH    East Of England              174           2,1%           217           217             ~0
UKI    London                       319           3,9%           399           399             ~0
UKJ    South East (England)         164           2,0%           205           205             ~0
UKK    South West (England)         96            1,2%           120           120             ~0
UKL    Wales                        25            0,3%           32            32              ~0
UKM    Scotland                     148           1,8%           185           185             ~0
UKN    Northern Ireland             20            0,2%           25            25              ~0
UKZZ   Gibraltar                     0            0,0%            0             0              ~0
       TOTAL (Mio €)                 1.322,5      16%             1.653,1       1.653,1             ~0,0
       _ UK Contribution             1.044,2                      1.305,2       1.653,1             ~0,0
       _ EU27 Contribution              278,4                        347,9           0,0            ~0,0
                                                                                           11-12-2018 | 17
                          SOURCE: Regional R&I Viewer, our own estimations based on H2020 contribution
ESTIMATING THE IMPACT ON BELGIAN REGIONS

NUTS           REGION             H2020 CONTRIBUTION          ESTIMATIONS FOR HORIZON EUROPE
                                   (YEARLY AVERAGE)                    AFTER BREXIT

                                 MIO EUROS      SHARE       SCENARIO A    SCENARIO B    SCENARIO C

BE1    Brussels-Capital Region      144          1,8%           180           215           215

BE2    Flanders                     206          2,5%           258           308           308

BE3    Wallonia                     48           0,6%           60            72            72

          TOTAL (Mio €)            398           5%            497           594           594

                         SOURCE: Regional R&I Viewer, our own estimations based on H2020 contribution

                                                                                                  18
THE MULTIPLIER EFFECT ON BELGIAN REGIONS
 BASED ON REGIONAL I/O TABLES BY THE FEDERAL PLANNING BUREAU OF BELGIUM

       REGION
                          H2020                                         HORIZON EUROPE
                 (Contribution in Mio Euros)                        (Contribution in Mio Euros)
                                                       Scenario A                         Scenarios B&C

Brussels-C.R.               144                           180                                     215
Flanders                    206                           258                                     308
Wallonia                     48                            60                                     72
       BELGIUM              398                           497                                     594
                                      Jobs Creation (of which, in R&D)
Brussels-C.R.            915 (430)                     1140 (535)                          1360 (640)
Flanders                1760 (1010)                   2200 (1260)                          2620 (1510)
Wallonia                 530 (350)                      660 (440)                           790 (520)
       BELGIUM          3205 (1790)                   4000 (2235)                          4770 (2670)

                                                                                                          19
KEY MESSAGES AND NEXT STEPS
CONCLUSIONS

                              20
KEY MESSAGES 1/2

      FP/H2020 IS NOT A SPACE-BLIND POLICY,
   BUT A POLICY FOR STRONG, GROWING REGIONS
       BECAUSE KNOWLEDGE IS CUMULATIVE
        LEADING TO SPATIAL CONCETRATION.

                                              21
KEY MESSAGES 2/2

       THE COMPETITIVE RATIONALE OF FP/HORIZON 2020
             IS HIGHLY BENEFICIAL FOR THE UK,
            MORE THAN ANY OTHER MEMBER STATE

           DEPENDING ON THE BREXIT SCENARIOS,
 HORIZON EUROPE WILL BENEFIT EUROPEAN REGIONS DIFFERENTLY

                                                            22
NEXT STEPS

ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF FP/H2020
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT RECEIVE FUNDING
>>> STAIRWAYS TO EXCELLENCE

ANALYSIS OF JOBS CREATION AND OTHER ECONOMIC
IMPACTS IN ALL EU REGIONS USING RHOMULO

                                               23
NICOLA FRANCESCO DOTTI
NICOLA.DOTTI@VUB.BE

@NFDOTTI // WWW.NFDOTTI.ME

ANDRÉ SPITHOVEN
ANDRE.SPITHOVEN@VUB.BE

WALTER YSEBAERT
WALTER.YSEBAERT@VUB.BE

                             24
You can also read