HALF HOURLY (HH) ESTIMATION DURING - Guidance Note Public - Elexon
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
H A L F H O U R LY ( H H )
E S T I M AT I O N D U R I N G
COVID-19
Guidance Note
Public
1 July 2021 Version 8.0
© Elexon 2021 Page 1 of 6Half Hourly (HH) Estimation During COVID-19
Contents
Contents 2
Half Hourly Export 4
Half Hourly Reactive Import 4
Half Hourly Active Import 4
Approach for when sites re-open or consumption increases or returns to ‘pre-shut down’ levels 5
Requirements during the three-month notice period prior to the derogations ending and upon
derogations ending 5
Prioritisation for obtaining Actual Meter Readings 6
Use of data from shut down period(s) for future reference data 6
1 July 2021 Version 8.0
© Elexon 2021 Page 2 of 6Half Hourly (HH) Estimation During COVID-19 *GUIDANCE EFFECTIVE FROM 21 MARCH 2020 – 30 SEPTEMBER 2021* UPDATED 1 JULY 2021 Elexon has been contacted by a number of electricity Suppliers in the HH market, who have raised concerns about the level of costs that they are seeing through Settlement for sites which have suddenly reduced consumption. This is because it has become harder to obtain Meter Reads where businesses or premises are shut and Metering Systems communications to the HH Data Collector (HHDC) are not working. In such cases, the estimation processes used by HHDCs (in line with BSCP502 – Half Hourly Data Collection for SVA Metering Systems Registered in SMRS) and, in particular, the order in which information provided is used to calculate an appropriate estimate, may not be appropriate in the case of a sudden shut down of premises across the country. Elexon convened a group of industry experts, including HH Suppliers and Supplier Agents, who met on 1 April 2020 to discuss this issue and provide guidance to the industry. The group discussed numerous options and concluded that the following approach was the best available to Suppliers wishing to ensure estimation is as accurate as possible. The group met again on 23 April to discuss approaches that could be taken for when businesses re-open and consumption returns to more ‘normal’ levels. We would encourage Suppliers to take heed of this advice and engage proactively with their Supplier Agents to put the actions suggested in place, as Settlement inaccuracy could result in financial impacts to both Suppliers and, where there are shared billing and Settlement systems, end customers. The Performance Assurance Board (PAB) has discussed and agreed this approach and encourages Suppliers and Supplier Agents to follow the guidance below. As Government lockdown restrictions were being relaxed the expert group reconvened on 28 July 2020 to agree a proposed timetable for ending the COVID-19 lockdown derogations. The approach was agreed and reflected in the document. The initial approach taken was to apply the derogated process set out here in response to the start of each lockdown period and to announce the ending of the derogations and a three month notice period to the industry at the end of each lockdown. However, in November 2020 the PAB noted that the varying local tiers restrictions, potential for numerous future lockdowns and the approach taken to gradually easing restrictions at the end of the first lockdown had meant this approach was difficult to manage. It agreed that it would be inefficient and risk-prone to manage each lockdown period separately in future. On 28 January 2021, the PAB agreed a change of approach to enable the derogations to remain in place until there is a level of confidence that government restrictions which significantly impact Settlement operations have concluded. The PAB would review the need for the derogations on a quarterly basis and invite industry to provide feedback as part of this process. On 24 June 2021, the PAB agreed in accordance with this process that a three-month notice period would begin on 1 July 2021. At the end of this period, on 30 September 2021, the derogations will end. 1 July 2021 Version 8.0 © Elexon 2021 Page 3 of 6
Half Hourly (HH) Estimation During COVID-19 Half Hourly Export The below guidance only relates to HH Import Metering Systems. For Export Metering Systems, the current estimation rules remain applicable. BSCP502, paragraph 4.2.2a requires that HHDC estimate zeroes “until such time that evidence of Export energy transfer is provided”. In the current circumstances, Suppliers and HHDCs should not take too narrow a view of what sort of evidence is acceptable (for example, the availability of a meter advance), to ensure that generators are not settled on zeroes inappropriately. Half Hourly Reactive Import BSCP502 sections 4.2.1 (g) and (h) require the HHDC to use the Measurement Class specific Default EAC in conjunction with a power factor of 0.9 to calculate any missing Reactive Import values. In the current circumstances, it may be more appropriate for Suppliers to direct HHDCs to use the Supplier EAC (along with a power factor of 0.9) for this calculation instead. Similarly, BSCP502 section 4.12.1 (e) requires that, for DCC enrolled Metering Systems, the Measurement Class specific Default EAC is used for the estimation of Reactive Energy. Again, it may be more appropriate for Suppliers to direct HHDCs to use the Supplier EAC for this estimation. Half Hourly Active Import Approach for when sites are shut down or have a reduction in consumption Sections 4.2 and 4.12 of BSCP502 define the order of precedence for HHDCs to apply different estimation techniques when metered data is unavailable. Some of these – 4.2.1(a) to (e) and 4.12.1(a) to (c) – are for use when some data from the meter is available, and are likely to remain appropriate for sites that have shut down or changed their consumption considerably. But others – 4.2.1(f) and 4.12.1(d) – rely on historical data that may no longer be accurate for such sites. To address the issues with methods 4.2.1(f) and 4.12.1(d), Suppliers should work with customers to establish if HH sites, for which these types of estimate are being used, have been shut down. For these sites, Suppliers should look at previous consumption data from the customer, or similar types of customers, to determine the likely consumption during this period (for example, if there are any previous examples of the site being shut down, such as perhaps during the Christmas period) rather than applying a blanket approach to adjustments and instruct the HHDC to use this consumption data in estimation, which may require the submission of an EAC reflecting such consumption data. Suppliers that submitted adjusted EACs to their DCs during the previous lockdown periods should review these, to consider any new information from the customers and any actual data received in the intervening period, before either reusing them or allowing their use to continue. The EAC should denote an “effective from date” to reflect the date of the site shut down. For a HH SVA Metering System which is not enrolled in the DCC, the HHDC can apply the Supplier’s estimate of consumption using one of the following techniques (noting that some HHDCs may be constrained in what processes they can follow): BSCP502, paragraph 4.2.1(f) (v) (if operational or other data can be used); or BSCP502, paragraph 4.2.1(g) (if no operational or other data can be used). For a HH SVA Metering System, which is enrolled in the DCC, a Supplier and their Supplier Agents may agree to use the estimation method detailed in: BSCP502, paragraph 4.12.1(d) (v) (if operational or other data can be used); or BSCP502, paragraph 4.12.1(e) (if no operational or other data can be used). In a deviation from the usual process, HHDCs may proceed to method 4.2.1(g) and 4.12.1(e) of estimation without attempting the previous methods of 4.2.1(f) and 4.12.1(d), for sites that have been shut down, as these estimation methods are likely to be more representative estimates of the energy consumption. Suppliers should be mindful that the application of revised EACs and estimation adjustment is manually intensive for HHDCs and take account of this when considering turn-around times. Suppliers should also be mindful that If an MSID has been within the derogated process and is then subject to a CoS and if the new Supplier had not adequately assessed the usual annual consumption level at site and confirmed the right level of reductions for lockdown with its customer, the new Supplier may not realise that the EAC has already been reduced through the derogated process 1 July 2021 Version 8.0 © Elexon 2021 Page 4 of 6
Half Hourly (HH) Estimation During COVID-19
and apply a further reduction. Suppliers ensuring they have good communication with their customers regarding their
usual annual consumption levels and their current operational level, as part of their process for collecting evidence to
support the EAC reduction put in place, will help to prevent this issue from occurring.
An audit trail for this action must be maintained by the Supplier, including information about the site, communication
between the Supplier and Supplier Agents, and the operational or historical data, if used, such a snap shots of past
consumption during previous closures at various time of the day.
This guidance is effective from the date of publication. Actions may be taken to ‘back date’ estimations to 21
March 2020 (or 24 March 2020, depending on the nature of the customer’s business) for the first lockdown and
to 5 November 2020 for the second lockdown, in line with the government directive to close certain
businesses. However, estimations must never be backdated to pass the RF boundary at the time they are
processed. The PAB issued a three-month notice period to end the derogations allowed within this guidance
on 1 July 2021 and the derogations will end on 30 September 2021.
Approach for when sites re-open or consumption increases or returns to ‘pre-shut down’ levels
At the conclusion of the shutdown for a site, Suppliers should get a download of the metered data as quickly as
possible. For those sites for which the Supplier has applied the above process, they should instruct the HHDC that shut
down period at each site has ended and send a revised EAC to the HHDC with an “effective from date” to reflect the
date of resumption of normal activities unless there is auditable evidence that the EAC in place is still appropriate.
An auditable trail for this action must be maintained by the Supplier, including information about the site and
communication between the Supplier and Supplier Agents.
Auditable evidence could include but is not limited to:
Reads, consumption data, or relevant information about the supply obtained from a site visit
Reads, consumption data, or relevant information about the supply obtained through direct contact with the end
customer
Evidence that the supply is directly affected by COVID-19 measures put in place by the Governments of Great
Britain, for example that it is for a site that is legally unable to open
For sites which resume operations and for which actual readings are still not available actual data collected prior to the
shutdown of the site may be helpful to use for the estimation process. Therefore, in a derogation to the normal process,
actual data from the period prior to the shutdown of a site may be used in preference to data collected during the
period of shutdown for that site, if required for estimation. Suppliers should provide clear communication to their
HHDCs in addition to any data flows, so that all parties are clear on the position and actions to be taken.
In summary:
If an HHDC is required to estimate the data for a HH SVA Metering System which is not enrolled in the DCC, it
should not necessarily follow the estimation precedence steps detailed in BSCP502 4.2.1 (e) and (f). Steps (i)
to (iii) may require the use of data from the shutdown period; this data should not be used and HHDCs can
proceed to step (iv) and use data from a period prior to the shutdown.
Similarly, if a HHDC is directed to estimate the data for a HH SVA Metering System which is enrolled in the
DCC, it should not necessarily follow the estimation precedence steps detailed in BSCP502 4.12.1 (c) and (d).
Steps (i) to (iii) may require the use of data from the shutdown period; this data should not be used and HHDCs
can proceed to step (iv) and use data from a period prior to the shutdown.
Requirements during the three-month notice period prior to the derogations ending and upon derogations
ending
Suppliers should review all EACs during the three-month window (and as good practice thereafter) and work with their
Agents to ensure they are reflective of the current level of operations at the site, agreeing new EACs where necessary.
Supplier Agents should provide site level information to the Supplier that would help to update the EAC, for example
where access to a site is refused by the customer for a hand-held read even though the site is open.
An auditable trail of this review, including information about the site and communication between the Supplier, Supplier
Agents and/or end customers must be maintained by the Supplier and may form the basis of a Technical Assurance of
Performance Assurance Parties (TAPAP) check once the derogations have ended.
1 July 2021 Version 8.0
© Elexon 2021 Page 5 of 6Half Hourly (HH) Estimation During COVID-19
In the absence of any actual data or register reads, DCs should continue to use the COVID-19 EAC and follow the
derogated estimation process until 30 September 2021 unless instructed otherwise by the Supplier. From 1 October
2021, EACs and any remaining estimated volumes during the lockdown period agreed for the derogation will be
permitted to stay in place where the available evidence supports these estimations. However, the ability to change the
order of precedence in the BSCP will cease.
Where the derogated EAC is to remain in place, the Supplier should submit a list of such MSIDs including the MSID
number, EAC and rationale for the derogated EAC remaining in place to Elexon by the end of the derogated period. As
above, the evidence maintained by the Supplier supporting the retention of these EACs may form the basis of a
Technical Assurance of Performance Assurance Parties (TAPAP) check once the derogations have ended.
At its meeting on 28 July 2020, the expert group agreed that updated EACs should be sent from Suppliers to DCs
before the end of the derogation but noted there may be instances where this is not possible or yet appropriate.
Therefore, the guidance was updated to reflect this.
Prioritisation for obtaining Actual Meter Readings
When it is possible to perform site visits for sites which are subject to estimation, it is important that Suppliers, Data
Collectors and Meter Operators plan an approach for prioritising the work, including both data collection and meter fault
investigation/resolution. This approach should consider the following factors: volume of estimated energy;
Measurement Class; Export or Import; Meter memory/storage capability and sites utilising a revised EAC. This list is
not exhaustive nor in a defined order of prioritisation; parties should work together to determine how sites visits are
approached. When attempting to get data it is important that Suppliers and Supplier Agents are mindful of all Parties
across the industry, regardless of their size or portfolio.
Use of data from shut down period(s) for future reference data
Any instances of reduced or revised consumption, resulting from the actions detailed above, must not be used for
future Data Estimation procedures (unless there are further shutdowns of sites). In line with the obligations of
BSCP502 paragraph 4.2, which states: “[…] HHDCs should take particular care when carrying out data estimation
using, or during, public holiday periods, e.g. Christmas and New Year, where abnormal consumption patterns may be
experienced. Profiles from similar periods in previous years may be used where applicable and available”, HHDCs
should assume the period of shut down to also be abnormal consumption patterns, and thus treat this data accordingly.
As the above approaches are deviations from the standard processes, but ones required to improve the accuracy of
Settlement, Elexon, the PAB and the BSC Auditor will not raise BSC Audit Issues against Parties who have followed
the above derogations to the normal processes.
The PAB expects Parties to provide the evidence for the above actions to Elexon or the BSC Auditor upon
request at any time. As a minimum, this should include:
For Suppliers: MSID, HHDC MPID, previous EAC, new EAC, rationale or methodology of calculation of new
EAC, effective from date of new EAC.
For HHDCs: MSID, Supplier MPID, previous EAC, new EAC, effective from date of new EAC.
1 July 2021 Version 8.0
© Elexon 2021 Page 6 of 6You can also read
