DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES - Turning a "Blind Eye"? Compliance with Minimum Wage Standards and Employment
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 14456 Turning a “Blind Eye”? Compliance with Minimum Wage Standards and Employment Andrea Garnero Claudio Lucifora JUNE 2021
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 14456 Turning a “Blind Eye”? Compliance with Minimum Wage Standards and Employment Andrea Garnero OECD, European Commission JRC, Université libre de Bruxelles and IZA Claudio Lucifora Department of Economics and Finance, Università Cattolica and IZA JUNE 2021 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: publications@iza.org www.iza.org
IZA DP No. 14456 JUNE 2021 ABSTRACT Turning a “Blind Eye”? Compliance with Minimum Wage Standards and Employment* Turning a “blind eye” to non-compliance with minimum wage standards is sometimes presented as a pragmatic way to accommodate higher wages while not harming employment opportunities for workers employed in marginal firms. In this paper, we model firms’ wage and employment decisions, and show that there may be a trade-off between non-compliance and employment. The main prediction of the model are empirically tested using data from the Italian labour force survey. We find evidence of a positive employment non-compliance effect, though elasticities are smaller than typically thought as employers internalize the expected costs of non-compliance. We also show that employment effects are larger at low levels of non-compliance (when the risk of being referred to court is very low). The implications for policy and the role of regulators in monitoring and sanctioning non-compliance are discussed. JEL Classification: J31, J52, J83 Keywords: collective bargaining, sectoral minimum wages, compliance Corresponding author: Claudio Lucifora Department of Economics and Finance Università Cattolica Largo Gemelli 1 20123 Milan Italy E-mail: claudio.lucifora@unicatt.it * We are grateful to Enrico Roletto for outstanding research assistance. Andrea Bassanini, Pierre Cahuc, Andrea Ichino, Pedro Martins, Carlo Menon, Daphne Nicolistas, Giovanni Pica, Giulio Piccirilli, Andrea Salvatori and Jonathan Thomas as well as two anonymous referees provided useful comments. We are also grateful to participants at the AIEL Conference and seminars held at Queen Mary University of London, University of Cagliari, Università Cattolica, Confindustria, the OECD and IAB. Claudio Lucifora acknowledges funding from the European Union (CoBExt action, grant VS/2016/0340) and Università Cattolica D.3.2. Strategic Project “Evidence Based Anti-Poverty Policies”. This study reflects only the authors’ views and should not be attributed to the OECD, the European Commission or any member country. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information that the study contains.
workers have the right to a remuneration commensurate to the quantity and quality of their work and in any case such as to ensure them and their families a free and dignified existence
y fL fL wB w wB w wB LB LB L w L LB w
wB L LB wB w wB w L LB q U NC U’’ U NC W L L W U W U L . , NC L LB ’L LB > L LB
L LB L L w
q for a given level of non-compliance f’ L wB wB plus
i-th j-th r
j r j r within
4.1 Data de facto
Wage floors in collective agreements salari di competenza Individual wages and other individual-level controls de facto
co.co.pro Non-compliance NC de facto
Baseline results
The role of the efficiency of labour courts P t F E
Robustness tests
ad hoc
Review of Economics and Statistics Review of Economics and Statistics The Economic Journal Journal of Labor Economics German Economic Review European Journal of Industrial Relations The Review of Economic Studies The American Economic Review Quarterly Journal of Economics Journal of Political Economy
Economica American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Journal of Applied Econometrics British Journal of Industrial Relations IZA Journal of Labor Policy Journal of Economic Geography The Journal of Law & Economics Review of Economics and Statistics European Economic Review European Economic Review Journal of Public Economics CoBExT Working paper Journal of Labor Economics Negotiating Our Way Up. Collective Bargaining in a Changing World of Work International Labour Review Labour Economics
Economic Policy. Journal of Development Economics Diritto delle Relazioni Industriali Journal of Labor Economics
Source
Main variables Mean Std. Dev. Min Max Controls Sector Region Source
Note:
Note:
Note:
Note:
Note:
Note:
OLS OLS (without zeros) Note:
Panel A: Dummy Panel B: Continuous
Panel A: Non-compliance dummy Panel B: Non-compliance continuous
fL w for any level
You can also read