COVID-19 - FAQ force majeure - KPMG Law
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
COVID-19 – FAQ force majeure You would like to know what “force majeure” means in connection with the coronavirus for your contracts? 1. Is the coronavirus outbreak a case of "force majeure" and what does it mean? Force majeure means a non-operative external event which is unforeseeable and even with utmost care cannot be prevented. Force majeure clauses in contracts and general terms and conditions usually are based on this definition. Examples of force majeure are war, natural events, sovereign orders, contagion, pandemics and epidemics (regarding the SARS virus: Local Court Augsburg, judgment of 09 November 2004, case no.: 14 C 4608/03 and cholera: Local Court Homburg, judgment of 02 September 1992 – 2 C 1451/92-18). On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organisation (WHO) classified the coronavirus outbreak at its current level as a pandemic (https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening- remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—11-march-2020). The risk assessment of the Robert Koch Institute is also based on this classification. (https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Risikobewertung_Grundlage.html). Federal Government and the Robert Koch Institute have been using the term “epidemic” at least since 10 March 2020. However, to date there have been no court decisions as to whether the coronavirus is a case of “force majeure” and if so, since what point in time and for which regions this should be the case in detail. In legal terms, in cases of force majeure, the obligated party usually is temporarily excused from its obligation to perform for the duration of the force majeure event or performance deadlines may be extended. The effects and damages of the force majeure event therefore affect the parties themselves. Depending on the drafting of the clause, the parties may also be permitted to cancel the contract in the event of prolonged impediments to performance. However, it must be taken into account that the party obliged to render the characteristic performance (delivery, execution of an event, transport etc.) must do everything reasonable to prevent or overcome the occurrence of the force majeure event. You or your company insofar have the obligation to take, in particular, precautions, exercise due care and, under certain circumstances, to procure replacements. A general force majeure event therefore does not simply rule out claims for damages by the contractual partner. This is the case, in particular, if a guarantee or a special performance risk has been assumed. Also, even though at this stage of the outbreak, the coronavirus has the character of a general pandemic, the following must always be assessed on a case-by-case basis:
Does the respective contractual relationship include a force majeure clause? Does it explicitly or by way of interpretation cover pandemics and epidemics? Is the specific impediment to performance (loss of production or non-delivery, transport issues, event cancellation, etc.) directly (e.g. due to an official order to shut down the production plant or a ban on events) or only indirectly attributable to the coronavirus? The boundaries can be fluid – also due to the constantly changing factual situation and knowledge. In addition, force majeure clauses, which are too broad may be invalid as general terms and conditions. Under certain circumstances, this may have the effect that the party providing the general terms and conditions cannot invoke “force majeure” because of the effects of the coronavirus. Finally, the Party invoking force majeure because of the coronavirus must satisfy all obligations to furnish information, notification and proof. A plea of force majeure therefore should not only be made in due time but should also be legally and factually substantiated. 2. What if a contract does not contain a force majeure provision, the force majeure clause does not apply or if it even is invalid? If the contract does not contain a force majeure clause, if such clause is not pertinent or possibly invalid, other contractual provisions must be examined which grant the parties cancellation or amendment rights (e.g. “hardship” clauses). Moreover, the contractual parties’ rights and duties are subject to the relevant statutory law. The respective choice of law clause in international contractual relations insofar also plays an important role when assessing the legal situation. For example, the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) provides for a separate force majeure rule in the international trade of goods. The seller’s obligations in the individual case are also determined by this, in particular with regard to reasonable additional expenses and procuring replacement. Some contracts explicitly rule out the application of the CISG. Otherwise, the CISG applies in many – but by no means all – cross-border contracts, even if the contractual parties may not even be aware of it. The BGB does not contain a separate force majeure provision. However, a contractual party may be excused from its obligation to perform if it is unable to perform (Section 275 BGB). If this is the case, the other contractual party is also released from consideration under the law (Section 326 BGB). Whether claims for damages can be asserted in spite of the impossibility of performance depends on the contractual provisions and on whether any duties to exercise due care, take precautions or procure replacements have been observed. A claim for damages under German law generally requires responsibility (“Vertretenmüssen”). Responsibility may be assumed even without actual fault if a guarantee or a special performance risk has been assumed. Events resulting from the coronavirus outbreak possibly may also lead to an interference with the basis of the transaction or frustration of contract (Section 313 BGB). This requires that the affected circumstance has become the basis of the contract and that this has changed profoundly, with the consequence that after weighing up the interests involved, it is unreasonable for a contractual party to adhere to the contract. This contractual party can request an amendment to the contract or – in the extreme case – cancel it. In particular, the criteria of risk distribution, predictability and unfairness must be considered and weighted. Only in extremely rare cases do the courts assume frustration of contract and apply strict criteria. Should your company anticipate that it may have to invoke force majeure or frustration of contract with regard to existing contracts, it is advisable to keep detailed records of the circumstances which in the event of a dispute would have to be presented in court. Moreover, in order to maintain business relationships in the long term, a proactive review of the legal situation and a search for amicable solutions with all parties involved makes sense, especially in times of legal and factual uncertainty. Support-Hotline: +49 30 530199-288
E-Mail Support: de-covid-19@kpmg-law.com Contact: KPMG Law Dr. Christine Heeg-Weimann, LL.M. Dr. Philipp Asbach (Sydney) Senior Manager Partner 040 3609945170 +49 211 4155597272 Contact Contact © 2020 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, assoziiert mit der KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, einem Mitglied des KPMG- Netzwerks unabhängiger Mitgliedsfirmen, die KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), einer juristischen Person schweizerischen Rechts, angeschlossen sind. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. KPMG International erbringt keine Dienstleistungen für Kunden. Keine Mitgliedsfirma ist befugt, KPMG International oder eine andere Mitgliedsfirma gegenüber Dritten zu verpflichten oder vertraglich zu binden, ebenso wie KPMG International nicht autorisiert ist, andere Mitgliedsfirmen zu verpflichten oder vertraglich zu binden.
You can also read