Codex Fiber Definition: Towards - Implementation Issues of
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Implementation Issues of the Codex Fiber Definition: Towards Resolution II Latin American ICC Cereal Conference: “Keys for Cereal Chain Innovation” Santiago, Chile April 10-13, 2011 David R. Lineback Joint Institute for Food Safety and Nutrition -for- The International Life Sciences Institute, North America
Codex Definition for Dietary Fiber • The Codex Committee for Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU) was charged by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) in 1992 with outlining a definition for Dietary Fiber. • After 16 years of deliberations, a definition was submitted and adopted by the CAC in 2009.
Codex Definition for Dietary Fiber 2009 (abbreviated for slide) Dietary fibre means carbohydrate polymers1 with 10 or more monomeric units2, which are not hydrolysed by the endogenous enzymes in the small intestine of humans and belong to the following categories: 1. Edible polymers naturally occurring in the food 2. Polymers, which have been obtained from food raw material by physical, enzymatic or chemical means 3. Synthetic polymers The latter two must be shown to have a physiological effect of benefit to health as demonstrated by generally accepted scientific evidence to competent authorities.
Dietary Fiber Definition: Importance of Harmonization • A science-based definition ensures reference to substances with specific characteristics • Accurate communication of the fiber content of foods is essential to improving dietary intakes • Lessens likelihood that substances may be identified as fiber that lack a physiological benefit, or failure to identify substances that have a “fiber” benefit • Essential for comparison of intakes across geographic regions and interpretation of studies • A harmonized definition lessens trade barriers
Codex Definition for Dietary Fiber 2009: Issue #1 “Dietary fibre means carbohydrate polymers1 with 10 or more monomeric units 2 …. FOOT NOTE 2: “2Decision on whether to include carbohydrates from 3 to 9 monomeric units, i.e. DP 3-9, should be left to national authorities.”
Codex Definition for Dietary Fiber 2009: Issue #2 “The latter two [ALL BUT INTACT] must be shown to have a physiological effect of benefit to health as demonstrated by generally accepted scientific evidence to competent authorities.” ---HOWEVER--- Physiological effects are not identified; benefit to health - supporting evidence is not defined.
9th Vahouny Symposium on Dietary Fiber (Maryland, USA; June, 2010) Objective included an emphasis on the scientific basis for and benefits of a single worldwide definition. (international symposium) Three areas for discussion: 1. Inclusion of DP 3-9 (“FOOTNOTE 2”) 2. How to better define and substantiate “beneficial physiological effects” 3. Analytical methodology
Inclusion of DP 3-9 (Vahouny Symp.) No readily applicable analytical methods to distinguish DP 3-9 from DP
Issue: Physiological Effects Beneficial effects are required for all but “intact” fibers; however, no established list of effects was provided. Yet, many global authorities use a common list of effects. HOW TO BEGIN TO DEVELOP AN EVOLVING LIST OF AGREED-UPON EFFECTS? (Vahouny Symp.)
Outcome: Physiological Effects (Vahouny Symposium) Three proposed categories: 1. Well established beneficial effects 2. Probable beneficial effects 3. Possible beneficial effects *Working list (Open to additions)
Physiological effects supported (Vahouny Symp.) Reduced total and/or LDL cholesterol Attenuation of postprandial glycemia/insulinemia Reduced blood pressure Increased fecal bulk/laxation Decreased transit time Increased colonic fermentation/SCFA production Positive modulation of colonic microflora Weight loss/reduction in adiposity Increased satiety
However, support was not equivocal for all effects - Comments: • Need to establish ultimate impact on health • What are the best methods to establish link to a “health benefit”? • Substantiation of a benefit should be case- by-case. The variety of effects points to the need for consumption of a VARIETY of fibers.
Participants requested response - record of prevailing opinion (Vahouny Survey) Item (n=75) Affirmative % Negative % No answer % Agree with inclusion of DP3-9 86.7 2.7 10.6 Decrease in total or LDL 98.7 1.3 cholesterol Reduction in blood glucose or 96 2.7 1.3 insulin Incr. stool bulk or decr. transit 98.7 1.3 time Fermentability of colonic N=75 82.7 6.7 10.6 microflora Proposed other effects 30.7 69.3
Conclusions from Vahouny Conf. • Strong support for inclusion of all digestion- resistant carbohydrates of DP 3 and above • There is strong scientific evidence linking fiber and – Lower serum and LDL cholesterol, – Lower blood glucose and insulin, and – Improved laxation and transit time. • Physiological effects need to be linked to health benefits. • Dietary fiber should be from a variety of sources.
Towards Resolution of the Issues • Science supports inclusion of DP 3 and above as fiber • More work is needed to establish an internationally agreed-upon list of physiological effects • Data to support a link to health benefits should be examined and gaps identified
Publication Howlett et al. 2010. The definition of dietary fiber – discussions at the Ninth Vahouny Fiber Symposium: building scientific agreement. Food & Nutrition Research. 54:1-5. Available on www.ilsi.org (English, and Spanish translation)
Thank You! Gracias!
You can also read