Implementing the Atmospheric Emission Licensing in the City of Tshwane - Presented by: Elizabeth Moatshe City of Tshwane Agric. & Environmental ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Implementing the Atmospheric Emission Licensing in the City of Tshwane Presented by: Elizabeth Moatshe City of Tshwane Agric. & Environmental Management 11 October 2010
Content • Governing legislation & policies • Administrative processes • AEL applications • Example of an AEL application • Ch ll Challenges • Recommendations • Conclusion
Governing legislation/policies • Constitution – section 24 of the Bill of Rights • NEMA – Chapter 5 i.e. EIA listed activities requiring environmental i t l authorisations th i ti • NEM: AQA – Chapter 5 i.e. licensing of listed activities • PAJA • TIEP • CoT AQM Plan
Administrative process AEL PROCEDURE - pre-application engagement • Provide application forms and advise on the AEL application process • Determine the listing of the proposed activity • Determine the necessity for an EIA application and listing of the activity in terms of the EIA regulations • Provide applicant with information required in the specialist air quality report needed
Administrative process cont… • Additional copies of application are requested • 1 electronic copy of the application • The hard copies would then be distributed to the internal Municipal Health Services Department, Environmental Planning/Open Space Management (if an EIA application was required), GDARD and national DEA as commenting authorities • Acknowledge A k l d receipt i t off application li ti within ithi 07 d days off submission (admin)
Administrative process cont… • Inform Province Pro ince (GDARD) & DEA about abo t the application • Arrange an authorities meeting for assessment of documentation e.g. GDARD & DEA (list of documentation received attached) • Request additional information (in cases where inadequate adequa e information o a o is s sub submitted) ed) within 30 days o of receipt • Compile all comments from internal departments, DEA and GDARD • Submit report and recommendation to AQO for consideration & decision making (Ex. Director) • Issue PAEL/AEL
AEL Applications since 1 April 2010 • 1 Provisional AEL approved – category 2&5, sub- category 2.2 (storage and handling of petroleum products) & 5.8 5 8 (Macadam preparation) • 1 AEL application with AQO for approval – category 4, sub-category 4.21(metal recovery) • 1 AEL application received for assessment – category 4, sub-category 4.9 (Ferro-alloy production) • Several inquiries q from industryy wrt APPA p permits and AQA transition • Advising on Council activities e.g. crematoria, asphalt plants power stations plants, stations, quarry
Case Study: Macadam Preparation AEL application pp • Complaints from community • Investigation – industry without permit/environmental authorisation/ AEL • Severity of problem (emissions-odour) needed immediate action • Provincial GDARD EMI’s – Administrative action against industry • Closure of activity (NEMA Section 24G) • Rectification notice – included many aspects e.g.. AEL EIA and AEL, d Air Ai Specialist S i li t Report R t
Processing the AEL application cont… • Authorities meetings with GDARD and DEA application pp submissions • EIA evaluation done & environmental authorisation issued 3 days after the AEL authority received the air specialist i li t reportt • Additional information on the air specialist report requested & evaluated by both DEA & the licensing authority • PAEL issued within 49 days of receipt of the air specialist i li t reportt
Lessons learned from the AEL application • Applicant (consultants) interfering with the administrative pprocess e.g. g ppressure on authorities by y politicians on administrators, lack of communication & consultation resulting conflicting authorisations • Compliance C li monitoring it i off AEL conditions diti – difficult diffi lt to t sustain . • Successes: relationship with DEA and GARD; setting up processes; buy in from top management and political will
Challenges • License fee still to be determined • Handling of controlled emitters (e.g. boilers smaller than 50MW) • Technical expertise on assessment of Air Specialist Reports (limited resources) • Compliance monitoring and enforcement – reliance on GDARD & DEA • PAEL/AEL conflicting conditions with Environmental Authorisations • Capacity of air quality practitioners • Amalgamation of CoT with other areas (Metsweding District) • Non compliance by municipality itself (facilities)
Recommendations • AEL fee calculator too cumbersome– should look at generic Government Gazetted fees • SOP developed in collaboration with Province on AEL & Environmental Authorisations applications • Municipalities should appoint specialists • Designation of local authority officials to monitor and enforce compliance • Announcement of controlled emitters/ By-lawy development to address gray areas
Conclusion • AEL process not simple and the larger the activity the more complicated it gets • Specialists are required • Procedures should be simplified and made nationally applicable • Very much a learning curve for all • Relationship between National/Province/Local very important p
I Thank you for your attention
You can also read