Climate warming 'backward - The last 100 Million years Transitions from Greenhouse to Icehouse Climate
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Climate warming `backward´ The last 100 Million years Transitions from Greenhouse to Icehouse Climate Climate System II Gerrit Lohmann with Christian Stepanek
Glacial-Interglacial variability Global Sea Level [m] (Bintanja et al., 2005) CO2 [ppmv] From ice cores (EPICA, 2009) Temp. anomaly “O-18” [°C] al ci al la i rg c la te Million years G In
Glacial-Interglacial variability Global Sea Level [m] (Rohling et al., 2009) CO2 [ppmv] From ice cores (EPICA, 2009) Temp. anomaly “O-18” [°C] Million years
ther 0 0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 halosteric SLR [m] Natural variability and perturbed climate (b) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 halosteric SLR [m] (b) deep paleo glacial-interglacial present, future 4 4 4 totalsteric SLR [m] (c) 4 4 totalsteric SLR [m] (c) Global Sea 3 3 2 m 3 3 2 2 2 2 Level [m] 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 1800 1900 2000 2100Year 2200 2300 2400 2500 Year Figure 5 global mean sea level change (m) contributed from (a) thermo steric, (b) halosteric and (c Figure 5 global mean sea level change (m) contributed from (a) thermo steric, (b) halosteric and total steric. total steric. RCP8.5 Scenarios CO2 RCP6 [ppmv] RCP4.5 RCP3-PD COSMOS+ISM Temp. anom. “O-18” [°C] Million years year (Kominz et al., 2008; Pagani et al., 2009; Kramer et al., 2011; Crowley & Kim 1995, Wei & Lohmann,)
Transitions from Greenhouse to Icehouse Climate: Evidence from Marine Sediments Das Bild kann nicht angezeigt werden. NH ice sheet Antarctic ice sheet Integrative approach Data-Modelling Proxy estimates of atmospheric Global deep-sea O-18 pCO2 (Pearson & Palmer 2000; Pagani et al. (Zachos et al. 2001) 1999, 2005)
Transitions from Greenhouse to Icehouse Climate: Evidence from Marine Sediments Das Bild kann nicht angezeigt werden. NH ice sheet Miocene Antarctic ice sheet Proxy estimates of atmospheric Global deep-sea O-18 pCO2 (Pearson & Palmer 2000; Pagani et al. (Zachos et al. 2001) 1999, 2005)
Transitions from Greenhouse to Icehouse Climate: Evidences from Marine Sediments Das Bild kann nicht angezeigt werden. NH ice sheet Miocene Eocene/Oligocene Antarctic ice sheet • Eocene long-term climate cooling • Eocene/Oligocene glaciation of Antarctica; drop in pCO2 • Compare to the Miocene/Pliocene cooling; low pCO2 Proxy estimates of atmospheric Global deep-sea O-18 pCO2 (Pearson & Palmer 2000; Pagani et al. (Zachos et al. 2001) 1999, 2005)
Climate warming `backward´ 1000
Flat Temperature Gradient Present Day Late Miocene Crowley Steppuhn et al., 2006 Reason? Many authors
Energy Budget • In steady state, energy follows energy balance model: CHANGE IN STORAGE = IN – OUT • many papers discuss an imbalance in this equation, which results in missing energy (Trenberth & Fasullo, 2012)
Northward Heat Transport
Global meridional heat transport divides roughly equally into 3 modes: 1. atmosphere (dry static energy) 2. ocean (sensible heat) 3. water vapor/latent heat transport The three modes of poleward transport are comparable in amplitude, and distinct in character (sensible heat flux divergence focused in tropics, latent heat flux divergence focus in the subtropics) (residual method, TOA radiation 1985-89 and ECMWF/NMC atmos obs) 90S 90N
Flat Temperature Gradient Present Day Late Miocene Crowley Steppuhn et al., 2006 Reason? Many authors Ø Sensible heat transport Ø Latent heat transport Ø Ocean heat transport Ø Orography Greenland: high latitude warming Ø Changes in the land surface cover Ø Other effects?
Flat Temperature Gradient Present Day Late Miocene Crowley Steppuhn et al., 2006 Reason? Many authors Ø Sensible heat transport ~ DT EBMs, …… Ø Latent heat transport ~ ¶q DT ¶T Caballero & Langen Ø Ocean heat transport Panama Gateway, Atlantic salinity reduction Ø Orography Greenland: high latitude warming Ø Changes in the land surface cover Ø Other effects?
Our current warming
boring for the hundredth time Energy Budget CHANGE IN STORAGE = IN – OUT • many papers discuss an imbalance in this equation, which results in missing energy (Trenberth & Fasullo, 2012)
Fanning and Weaver, 1996; Lohmann and Gerdes, 1998) to study the fee the atmosphere-ocean-sea ice system. One of the most useful examples of but powerful, model is the one-/zero-dimensional energy balance model. As Energy balance model point, a zero-dimensional model of the radiative equilibrium of the Earth is i (Fig. 1) Temperatures from EBMs: the e↵ective heat capacity matters 10 2 2 4 (1 ↵)S⇡R = 4⇡R ✏ T where the left hand side represents the incoming energy from the Sun (size of shadow area ⇡R2 ) while the right hand side represents the outgoing energy Earth (Fig. 1). T is calculated from the Stefan-Boltzmann law assuming a radiative temperature, S is the solar constant - the incoming solar radiation area– about 1367W m 2 , ↵ is the Earth’s average planetary albedo, measu 0.3. R is Earth’s radius = 6.371 ⇥ 106 m, is the Stefan-Boltzmann co 5.67 ⇥ 10 8 JK 4 m 2 s 1 , and ✏ is the e↵ective emissivity of Earth (about 0. Archer, 2010). The geometrical constant ⇡R2 can be factored out, giving (1 ↵)S = 4✏ T 4 Solving for the temperature, s 4 (1 ↵)S T = 4✏ Figure 1. Schematic view of the energy absorbed and emitted by the Earth following (1). Modified after Goose (2015). Since the use of the e↵ective emissivity ✏ in (1) already accounts for the g e↵ect we gain an average Earth temperature of 288 K (15 C), very close to boring for the hundredth temperature observations/reconstructions (Hansen ettime, but … al., 2011) at 14 C for 1
As a logical next Equation step, let us (10) now include an the shall be expl 20 diffusion which has Cp @t T = r · HT + (1 ↵)S(', t) ✏ T been 4 . p Temperatures from EBMs: the e↵ective heat capacity matters 13 with S(', t) being 1975a,b). In the calculated daily following (Berger and L coefficient k = 1.5 ·latitude 106 m2 /sisunder HT present = krT .O orbita 15 for large heat capacities. Furthermore, the mean tem Cp @t T = r · HT + (1 at high latitudes (for latitudes polewards of ' = 5 with moderate warming at low latitudes numerically. (dashed c The boundary hand side in the 25 energy balance 1975a,b; equations, Stocker both et al., 199f Figure 4. Equilibrium temperature of (15) using di↵erent di↵usion coefficients. The blue lines use 1.5 · 106 m2 /s with no tilt (solid line), a tilt of 23.5 (dotted line), and as the dashed line a tilt of 23.5 and ice-albedo feedback using the respresentation of Sellers (1969). Except for the dashed line, the global mean values are identical to the budget. In both considered cases, at strong diurna value calculated in (12). Units are C. different values of k (solid In the exercise, long-wave radiation as A + BT 20 the seasonal amplitude for the Cp -scenarios as in
✏ 1 Z⇡/2 (1 ↵)S cos ' cos ⇥ EBM ulate the zonal mean of (6) by integration at the latitudinal cycles we have s 4 T (') = d⇥ 2⇡ ✏ ⇡/2 p ⇡/2 s Z 2 4 (1 ↵)S = (cos ⇥)1/4 d⇥ (cos ')1/4 2⇡ 4✏ ⇡/2 | {z } 2.700 s 4 (1 ↵)S = 0.608 · (cos ')1/4 (7) 4✏ tion on latitude (Fig. 2). When we integrate this over the latitudes, we obtain ⇡/2 Z 1 T = T (') cos ' d' 2 ⇡/2 s ⇡/2 Z 0.608 4 (1 ↵)S = · (cos ')5/4 d' Figure 2. Latitudinal temperatures of the EBM with zero heat capacity (7) in cyan 2 4✏ (its mean as a dashed line), the global approach (3) as solid black line, and the zonal ⇡/2 | {z } Heat capacity of the climate system and time averaging (11) in red. The dashed brownish curve shows the numerical solution by taking the zonal mean of (9). 1.862 s s p 4 (1 ↵)S 4 (1 ↵)S Fast rotation = 0.4 2 = 0.566 (8) 4✏ 4✏ e, T = 163K is a factor 0.566 lower than 288 K Lohmann, as stated at (1). The standard 2020 https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/11/1195/2020/esd-11-1195-2020.pdf Fig. 1 has imprinted into our thoughts and lectures. We should therefore be
Practical Jan 11, 2022 Exercise EBM analysis • https://1drv.ms/u/s!AnZSDMNwdkDMgccDeu hjFFrmQHaqvw?e=ZaHqPA • https://1drv.ms/u/s!AnZSDMNwdkDMgbx6sr 3gVubSIqlYVw?e=MacPeK
You can also read