CI 303 Structured Analytics - Presented by Nan Bulger
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
CI 303 Structured Analytics Presented by Nan Bulger Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC 630.983.5530 www.academyci.com No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission from the Academy of Competitive Intelligence and Nan Bulger.
History Academy of Competitive Intelligence The Academy of Competitive Intelligence (ACI) is the original educational institution in the space of Competitive and Market Intelligence training. It was formed in 1999 by the “gurus” who created the field back in the 80’s: Leonard Fuld of Fuld & CO., Dr. Ben Gilad of the Academy of Competitive Intelligence Inc., and Jan Herring of Herring & Associates. Leonard Fuld created many of the intelligence-gathering techniques currently used by corporations around the globe, and his book, Competitor Intelligence: How to get it, how to use it (Wiley, 1985) was a best seller and the first book on the subject. His company Fuld & Co. was founded in 1979. Recently, Leonard has retired from Fuld & Co., and the Academy in 2017. Dr. Ben Gilad is considered a leading developer of competitive/strategic intelligence theory and practice in the US and the originator of both strategic early warning systems and war gaming for corporations. Ben is a former Associate Professor of Strategy at Rutgers University’s School of Management. His first books, The Business Intelligence System (1988) and Business Blindspots (1993), paved the way for the CI evolution in US corporations, many of which emulated the basic principles of Gilad’s CI process model. He also wrote Business War Games (2009) and is considered the “CI guru” in the industry. Jan Herring, formerly a senior CIA official set up the U.S. government’s first intelligence organization to assess the national security implications of foreign developments of civilian technology that could adversely affect the U.S. economy. Once retired from service, Jan designed and developed the first modern business intelligence system at Motorola (1985) and went on to advise many corporations on the principles of organizing the CI function. Jan has retired from the Academy in 2017. The CIP™ program which was created by these three CI founders is a complete intelligence program - from basics to advanced analysis – and the most widely recognized around the globe. Ben is still leading its analytical core, and its faculty expanded to include Troy Pfeffer, Nan Bulger, Heather Hallenbeck and Dr. Helen Rothberg.
Continuing Education Units (CEU) Core Courses - CIP™-I Certification Credits/CEUs CI 101/202 Competitive Intelligence Planning & Collection .7 CI 301 Competitive Blindspots .7 CI 302 Cross-Competitor Analysis .7 CI 303 Structured Analytics .7 CI 304 Reporting & Communicating Intelligence .7 Advanced Courses - Master of CI CIP™-II Certification CI 401 War Gaming: Theory and Practice 1.8 CI 402 Value Chain Analysis .7 CI 403 Anticipating Disruptions 1.4 Total CEU’s 7.4 In order to receive CEUs, participants MUST: 1. Sign in and out for each course 2. Attend each course for the entire duration 3. Participate 4. Complete the evaluation at the end of the day
Disclosure of Instructor’s Proprietary Interest We strongly discourage the promotion of paid services to the participants of the course during teaching. While the faculty’s expertise and leadership position in the field will inevitably lead to requests for subsequent services, questions and advice, maintaining professional decorum during the course delivery mandates that such discussions take place only after the course has been delivered.
This is a course in structured analysis. …what does that mean? …enabling and driving our competitiveness with a structured approach to decision making. The goal of this class is to teach you how to build an unbiased and flexible approach to decision making that is “non-linear“. Instead, we use structured analytic approaches derived from the security space and applied to business applications. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Our Course Road Map - Framing Competitiveness AM - PART ONE PM - PART TWO our present situational awareness …and where should we go? …where are we now?... Decision makers often start here introducing bias! “Prove MY hypothesis!” 1 2 3 4 Bias! contextual environmental view scenarios & key assumptions check Core 5 ecosystem competitive competency what if 6 7 landscape/ scenario 1 build assessment radar screen monitor/ ACH & chosen final report/ adjust hypothesis strategic what if hypothesis/ KPIS mapping hypothesis scenario 2 strategy KPOT execution KALS what if “Hypothesis Mapping” scenario 3 “ACH” *Structured Analytic “Indicators & “What If Analysis” “Assumptions Check” Techniques name is the Signposts of “Brainstorming “Quality of Information property of Richard Hauer and Change” Alternative Futures” Check” Randy Pherson “Devil’s Advocacy” applying non-linear thinking to structured analysis techniques for business resulting in clear decision making capabilities This framework is the property of N. Bulger, 2018 and may not be used without express written consent of the author. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Seminar Schedule & Agenda 8:30-9:00 INTRODUCTION , ROADMAP & CASE – Why are we here? What are non-linear thinking and structured analysis concepts? How do we define structured analysis and what is it’s origin? How do these concepts help us to be more competitive? Introduction to the case and why we choose this. 9:00-9:45 PART 1 - SITUATIONAL AWARENESS - Discussion on Eco System and Radar Screen Development 9:30-10:30 EXERCISE 1 [60 mins] – Build your Situational Awareness for McDonald’s. Build a comprehensive eco system mapping, identify drivers of change and build a competitive landscape radar screen. 10:30-10:40 BREAK -10 minutes! 10:40-11:00 PART 1 - SITUATIONAL AWARENESS - Core Competency Identification and Gaps – Industry/Yours – Ability to Succeed Measures 11:00-11:30 EXERCISE 2 [30 mins]– Core Competency Identification and Gaps – Industry/Yours – Ability to Succeed Measures 11:30-12:00 EXERCISE 1,2 READOUT – What does your situational awareness include? 12:00-1:00 LUNCH [60 minutes] 1:00-1:45 PART 2 - STRATEGY & STRATEGIC READINESS - Strategic Hypotheses, Types of Hypotheses and Assumption Checks, ACH {Analysis of Competing Hypotheses] 1:45-2:45 EXERCISE 3 – [60 minutes] Conduct Assumptions Checks and build a comprehensive ACH – Analysis of Competing Hypotheses. Select a favorable hypothesis. 2:45-2:55 BREAK [10 minutes] 2:55-3:25 EXERCISE 3 READOUT – Why did you choose a particular strategic hypothesis? 3:25 – 3:55 PART 2 - STRATEGY & STRATEGIC READINESS - What If Scenarios and Final Hypothesis 3:55-4:15 EXERCISE 4 – [20 minutes] Build one What If scenario and determine dynamics 4:15-4:45 EXERCISE 4 READOUT – Why did you choose a particular strategic hypothesis? 4:45 – 5:00 DISCUSSION BRIEF ON MONITORING COURSE CLOSEOUT, QUESTIONS - How can we set up a simple monitoring system based on what we have learned today? The definition of a KPIs versus KAIs. Tips on building a dashboard. Dashboards, 5:00 – 5:15 COURSE CLOSEOUT & QUESTIONS | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Our Case - McDonald’s is a major player in the beef burger market… in case you didn’t already know that….! – They have been challenged by changes in the market [analytics lines] – The Board of Directors wants a strategy that includes a full vegan menu across all markets – The CEO/CFO believe this is a mistake and wants to maintain the current menu and increase advertising in support of beef while letting foreign sales carry the losses in the US market – Others suggest a compromise however this is territory unfamiliar to McDonalds given their successful run for many years! Photo by XUNO. on Unsplash | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Before we begin…What is a “non-linear” approach? linear thinkers think like this …a predetermined process ‘here is my CONFIRMATION BIAS hypothesis… “it must fit my logic?” review the past & the past supporting data everyone falls in line and looks for the …start with what I details / new data know and fill in the that fits Adapted from N. Bulger’s SIR gaps… presentation, 10/2019 ‘P. Jahne/N. Bulger, 2019 This framework is the property of N. Bulger, 2018 and may not be used without express written consent of the author. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Before we begin…What is a “non-linear” approach? non-linear thinkers think like this “here is my hypothesis 1…” “here is my future hypothesis 2…” “here is my focused… priority always hypothesis” considering the “here is my unknowns …but what if I hypothesis 3…” don’t know…. …lots of disparate Adapted from N. Bulger’s SIR alternate dynamic data presentation, 10/2019 scenarios based on ‘P. Jahne/N. Bulger, 2019 assumptions This framework is the property of N. Bulger, 2018 and may not be used without express written consent of the author. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Part One Situational Awareness
Framing Competitiveness AM - PART ONE PM - PART TWO our present situational awareness …and where should we go? …where are we now?... WHY DO I WANT TO DO THIS? By starting with the eco-system build, we 1 develop a very clear understanding of the 2 3 4 dynamics that should drive our decisions and contextual environmental view begin the construction of early warning! scenarios & key assumptions check Core 5 competitive what if 6 7 ecosystem competency landscape/ scenario 1 build assessment radar screen monitor/ ACH & chosen final report/ adjust hypothesis strategic what if hypothesis/ KPIS mapping hypothesis scenario 2 strategy KPOT execution KALS what if “Hypothesis Mapping” scenario 3 “Indicators & “ACH” “What If Analysis” Signposts of “Assumptions Check” “Brainstorming Change” “Quality of Information Alternative Futures” Check” “Devil’s Advocacy” This framework is the property of N. Bulger, 2018 and may not be used without express written consent of the author. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
What is an eco system and an eco system driver? • Things [events, thoughts, ideas, etc…] that “encourage/enable/force a dynamic shift ” in the business environment • They can range from a number of elements and be radically different depending on where I sit in the world market • They are the foundational elements and the basis for assumption based modeling and predictive analytics | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Eco systems and drivers defined What is a eco system and why do we care? | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Companies compete in global environments so know what goes on there! ….what drives the environment that we compete in or want to compete in? Technology & Products Economic Political & Industry & Trends Regulatory Events Company A Catastrophic Business Customers or Evolving Environment Global &/ Partners or Regional other Demographics companies & Culture Global & Regional Competitors The Intelligence Synergy Model™ is the property of Nanette J. Bulger May not be used or distributed with express written consent of the owner | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
What are eco system drivers? • Things [events, thoughts, ideas, etc…] that “encourage/enable/force a dynamic shift ” in the business environment • They can range from a number of elements and be radically different depending on where I sit in the world market • They are the foundational elements and the basis for assumption based modeling and predictive analytics • Their importance may change depending on what is happening in the market • They often have dependencies and relationships with other drivers | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Companies have ALL kinds of relationships Even with one another! Technology Technology & Products & Products Economic Political Economic Political & Industry & & Industry & Trends Regulatory Trends Regulatory Events Company B Catastrophic Business Customers or Evolving Environment Events Company A Catastrophic Business Customers or Evolving Environment Global &/ Partners or Regional other Demographics companies Global & Regional Competitors Global &/ Partners or Regional other Demographics companies & Culture Global & Regional Competitors The Intelligence Synergy Model™ is the property of Nanette J. Bulger May not be used or distributed with express written consent of the owner | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Always build strategic hypotheses that are based on vetted drivers and well understood interdependencies! Topography? Income? Economic crisis? Gov. Regulations? Culture? | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Driver Template aka Indicators, & Signposts Eco System Category Driver Metrics to measure Notes Present Strategy - Positive Location: USA or Negative for McDonalds? Economic & Industry Trends Less Expendable income Unemployment levels People are eating in less expensive restaurants, take out or eat at home Demographic & Cultural Millennials make up 60% of Population mix Millennials and GenZ are a paying population growing population Vegan population 70% of Vegan market growth Many millennials are vegan paying population | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Framing Competitiveness AM - PART ONE PM - PART TWO our present situational awareness …and where should we go? …where are we now?... WHY DO I WANT TO DO THIS? The radar screen is actually just one aspect of the ecosystem build where we deep dive into existing 1 competition and disruptors. Why? Because you 2 3 4 may have future competition you don’t even know contextual environmental view about yet! scenarios & key assumptions check Core 5 competitive what if 6 7 ecosystem competency landscape/ scenario 1 build assessment radar screen monitor/ ACH & chosen final report/ adjust hypothesis strategic what if hypothesis/ KPIS mapping hypothesis scenario 2 strategy KPOT execution KALS what if “Hypothesis Mapping” scenario 3 “Indicators & “ACH” “What If Analysis” Signposts of “Assumptions Check” “Brainstorming Change” “Quality of Information Alternative Futures” Check” “Devil’s Advocacy” This framework is the property of N. Bulger, 2018 and may not be used without express written consent of the author. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Radar Screen tier definitions [if in relation to me as McDonald’s Tier 1 No barriers to entry. Main competitors. Threat of taking market share [BURGER KING] Some barriers to entry. Could partner with main Tier 2 competitors or acquire products, services, locations to take share and expand markets [Adjacencies – IMPOSSIBLE BURGER] McDonalds Tier 3 Have barriers to entry. May be inside or outside the industry. Could partner with main competitors or acquire products, services, locations to take share and expand markets. May have a different business model [UBER EATS] Tier 4 Disruptors. Outside the industry. Introduce a new business model. Might have completely new products and services [STARBUCKS] The Intelligence Synergy Model™ is the property of Nanette J. Bulger May not be used or distributed with express written consent of the owner | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Radar Screen Competitor Mapping How will the driver landscape effect your competition? Technology & Products Economic Political & Industry & Regulatory Trends Tier 1 Events Company A Catastrophic or Evolving Business Environment Customers Tier 2 Global &/ Tier 3 Partners or Regional other Demographics companies & Culture Global & Regional Tier 4 Competitors | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Review - Framing Competitiveness AM - PART ONE PM - PART TWO our present situational awareness …and where should we go? …where are we now?... REVIEW – Now we have SOME situational awareness about the market we will or would like to compete in and an understanding of the 1 disparate data that exists out there in space! 2 3 4 contextual environmental view scenarios & key assumptions check Core 5 competitive what if 6 7 ecosystem competency landscape/ scenario 1 build assessment radar screen monitor/ ACH & chosen final report/ adjust hypothesis strategic what if hypothesis/ KPIS mapping hypothesis scenario 2 strategy KPOT execution KALS what if “Hypothesis Mapping” scenario 3 “Indicators & “ACH” “What If Analysis” Signposts of “Assumptions Check” “Brainstorming Change” “Quality of Information Alternative Futures” Check” “Devil’s Advocacy” This framework is the property of N. Bulger, 2018 and may not be used without express written consent of the author. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Eco-system situational awareness e Build an eco system in which McDonald’s is competing exercise 1 You have been brought into McDonald’s to sit Timeframe on the leadership team and help make decisions • You have 60 minutes to complete BUT you are new to the organization…. this exercise 1. Build an eco system for McDonald’s for 1 global region [the US] You have some information on • Choose one person to explain your Europe, China. In your discussions, consider in eco system and another person to part what some of the differences might be. explain your radar screens and how 2. Build a 2 competitive radar screens. One with you and why they are different….if they at the center and 1 for the landscape in general. are. Discuss how they are different if they are and discuss the types of competitors you might find at each tier and why. • What did you learn from this 3. Do not yet consider what hypotheses are viable. exercise? Just consider market dynamics at this point. • What made this exercise difficult? | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Driver Template Exercise 1 e Flip Chart Template 1 exercise 1 Eco System Category Driver Metrics to measure Notes Present Strategy - Positive Location: USA or Negative for McDonalds? | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Template Exercise 1 e Flip Chart Template 2 exercise 1 McDonalds | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Template Exercise 1 e Flip Chart Template 3 exercise 1 Industry – Fast Food | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Framing Competitiveness AM - PART ONE PM - PART TWO our present situational awareness …and where should we go? …where are we now?... WHY DO I WANT TO DO THIS? Knowing what is needed to succeed in a market [core competencies or key success factors] and mapping our own capabilities against it will help 1 2 3 4 us to understand our gaps and set the stage for contextual environmental view our strategy. scenarios & key assumptions check Core 5 competitive what if 6 7 ecosystem competency landscape/ scenario 1 build assessment radar screen monitor/ ACH & chosen final report/ adjust hypothesis strategic what if hypothesis/ KPIS mapping hypothesis scenario 2 strategy KPOT execution KALS what if “Hypothesis Mapping” scenario 3 “ACH” “Indicators & “Assumptions Check” “What If Analysis” Signposts of “Quality of Information “Brainstorming Change” Check” Alternative Futures” “Devil’s Advocacy” This framework is the property of N. Bulger, 2018 and may not be used without express written consent of the author. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Core competencies and key success factors Simple Definition - A core competency [CC] is an internal skill set, process, tool, product, service or other element required to be successful in a marketplace that comes from their strength in the value chain. Examples: Fast Food Industry • Order to Delivery Time under x mins • Inventory/Delivery every day • Branding ability • Location • Efficiency of Operations. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Core Competencies - Ability to succeed template – Identifying red flags! Industry Core Competencies McDonald's Does Competitor A Does Competitor B Does Competitor Does Competitor What is needed and what have this [Tier 1] have this [Tier 2] have this C [Tier 3] have this D [Tier 4] have this customers want! competency? competency? competency? competency? competency? Operational Excellence i.e. Speed Y Y Y Y Y - Order to Delivery Time under x mins Marketing Acuity Y Y N N N Brand Strength Y Y Y Y Y Logistics Excellence Y Y N N N Let’s talk about this! What does it mean for strategy? | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Eco-system situational awareness – core competencies mapping e Determine A2S core competencies and map your own exercise 2 Now that you understand what is driving Timeframe the market and who is competing or may • You have 45 minutes to complete compete against McDonald’s, let’s outline this exercise what the core competencies and key success factors and compare them to • Choose one person to explain your determine ability to succeed industry core competency list and another to explain the gaps and Build a core competencies chart signposts. 1. Discuss red flag areas that may • What are your conclusions? indicate strengths others have or “signposts of change” 2. Would you change anything about • What did you learn from this the drivers of the market or your exercise? landscape now that you understand • What made this exercise difficult? competencies? | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Template Exercise 2 e Flip Chart Template 1 exercise 2 Industry Core Competencies McDonald's Does Competitor A Does Competitor B Does Competitor Does Competitor What is needed and what have this [Tier 1] have this [Tier 2] have this C [Tier 3] have this D [Tier 4] have this customers want! competency? competency? competency? competency? competency? | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Part One Review - Framing Competitiveness AM - PART ONE PM - PART TWO our present situational awareness …and where should we go? …where are we now?... 1 2 3 4 Review – Now we have situational awareness contextual environmental view scenarios & about the market that prepares us to build key informed strategic scenarios without bias. assumptions check competitive Core 5We know what the drivers of the market are ecosystem competency We know what whatthe 6 looks like if landscape 7 landscape/ scenario 1 build assessment radar screen beyond our immediate competition monitor/ ACH & chosen final We know what competencies report/ adjust are needed to hypothesis strategic what if hypothesis/ KPIS mapping scenario succeed and hypothesis who2 has them strategy KPOT execution KALS We should what ifto be able tell what the market scenario 3 “Hypothesis Mapping” looks like, where the needs are, who is a “Indicators & “ACH” “What If the Analysis” Signposts of “Assumptions Check” threat and where “Brainstorming opportunities exist. Change” “Quality of Information Check” Alternative Futures” “Devil’s Advocacy” This framework is the property of N. Bulger, 2018 and may not be used without express written consent of the author. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Part Two Building the Strategic Hypotheses
Eliminating bias and building the strategy AM - PART ONE PM - PART TWO WHY DO I WANT TO DO THIS? our present situational awareness …and where Strategy Development – The CEO does not …where are we now?... should we go? want to create a vegan strategy seeing that it failed in the past but the Board thinks McDonalds absolutely needs one and the time is right. What should McDonald’s do? How can you help drive the decision? How do you decide in an 1 2 3 unbiased way? 4 contextual environmental view scenarios & ACH & Hypothesis Mapping– Assumption key testing the various hypotheses is important and assumptions helps us to consider a number of hypotheses – check not just the one put in front of us! Core 5 ecosystem competitive competency what if 6 7 landscape/ scenario 1 build assessment radar screen monitor/ ACH & chosen final report/ adjust hypothesis strategic what if hypothesis/ KPIS mapping hypothesis scenario 2 strategy KPOT execution KALS what if “Hypothesis Mapping” scenario 3 “Indicators & “ACH” “What If Analysis” Signposts of “Assumptions Check” “Brainstorming Change” “Quality of Information Alternative Futures” Check” “Devil’s Advocacy” This framework is the property of N. Bulger, 2018 and may not be used without express written consent of the author. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Remember our “non-linear” approach to structured analysis? non-linear thinkers think like this “here is my hypothesis 1…” “here is my future hypothesis 2…” “here is my focused… priority always hypothesis” considering the “here is my unknowns …but what if I hypothesis 3…” don’t know…. …lots of disparate Adapted from N. Bulger’s SIR alternate dynamic data presentation, 10/2019 scenarios based on ‘P. Jahne/N. Bulger, 2019 assumptions This framework is the property of N. Bulger, 2018 and may not be used without express written consent of the author. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Consider All the Options Why do an assumptions check, map hypotheses via ACH and come up with various scenarios? • Helps us “not jump to conclusions or just fall in line with the status quo” • Helps the decision makers to be receptive to new leads and consider new evidence and ideas…. • Gives you confidence in your assumptions and explains the degree of confidence • Helps to identify new factors that may need further analysis. • May indicate an old premise that is no longer true • Provides an evidence trail • Some taxonomy…..A hypothesis is indicated by an “analytic line”….i.e. “The way to increase sales and grow market in China is through the development and launch of a full vegan offering.” | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Performing an Assumption Check – Dissecting the process There are many types of hypothesis situational awareness types but 3 main types…. H1 - Hypotheses 1. Scientific Theory - Something that is or could be happening H1- Climate change is man made and 2. Conspiracy - Something that has already happened Fact/ increasing. We must invest $1B in CC in 3. Business/Strategic Aspirations - Something that we need to Assumption 2020 happen in order to sustain or gain competitive advantage Credibility Importance Source? Level to the An assumptions check is just a subset of an ACH Hypothesis which we will speak about next! CO2 Concentrations are KF 1 White higher Paper 1 Credibility Level – Do we have proven credibly sourced Previous cycles were KF 2 White evidence? more regionally Paper 1 KF=Known Fact, MT = Maybe True, NE = No Evidence concentrated Models include KF 3 White Importance to the hypothesis – Does this proven piece of greenhouse gases along Paper 1 evidence make a difference to this hypothesis? Prioritize the with natural cycles importance. BE CAREFUL! [1=critical, 2=moderate, 3=not Climate change requires KF 1 White important at present] [Colors represent the effect on the businesses to change Paper 1 processes for emissions argument – Green = Positive, Yellow = Neutral, Red = Negative] More greenery than ever MT 2 White before Paper 1 Sourcing - How many important pieces of evidence have poor sourcing? How much evidence is here say? How many gaps do I have in this hypothesis? Did you source a number of Ocean levels are rising KF 3 USGS sources? Earth core temperature is KF 1 USGS rising Pros & Cons – Identify assumption arguments against the All people who voted for NE 1 NY Times analytic line as well! Trump do not believe in climate change | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
How does an ACH [Analysis of Competing Hypotheses]* brainstorming activity work? 1. Identify all hypotheses – all “analytic lines” 2. List evidence and arguments for and against in a matrix 3. Quality label all evidence 4. Refine Hypotheses, Evidence, Original Question 5. Evaluate hypotheses and eliminate 6. Find lynchpin evidence, scrutinize 7. Report conclusions, discuss relative likelihood 8. Identify milestones for future observations and monitor * The ACH Process was developed by Mr. Richard Hauer Photo Photo by by Austin Distel on on You X Ventures Unsplash Unsplash | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
How ACH [Analysis of Competing Hypotheses] Works H1- The Board’s Idea - H2- The CEO’s Idea - H3- Add vegetarian single offerings with McDonalds must enter the McDonalds must stick to its the beef offerings as one off choices 2. Outline vegan theinvarious market hypotheses 2020 with [ you core beef may in offerings have 2020one of your own or this exercise may a full vegan menu offerings and increasing advertising result in one! Market Effects Credibility Source? Importance to Importance to Importance to [Facts / Level Hypothesis Hypothesis Hypothesis Assumption] Pros & Cons! 4. Indicate the importance to the hypothesis with a number [3 = low importance, 2 = medium important, 1 = very important] and what effect it has on the hypothesis with a Vegan sales up KF Vegan color KF 1 [Green=positive KF -1 effect, Yellow = neutral, Red=negative, grayKF = 1no effect] 20% in 2019 Association Heart disease KF AMA KF-3 KF - 1 KF-2 1. Collect increased by all 3. Make sure you theinfacts 20% 2017 – have sourced all of use Beef your is less KF your AMA KF - 2 KF - 2 KF - 2 situational expensive than fact/assumptions/ vegetables awareness rumors. If it is a work to rumor indicate with Air freight is KF FAA KF-1 KF-1 KF-1 support increasing NE Regulations have KF FDA KF-3 KF-3 KF-3 changed the use of pesticides in 5. Complete the same process for all of the assumptions you listed. Add other plants making it assumptions as you move through the process and brainstorm. They do not have to harder to use pesticides apply to all of the hypotheses. If they only appeal to one, the others are colored gray. Interest rates KF US GOV KF-1 KF-3 KF-2 increased in 2018 Other????? NE Rumour NE-1 NE-1 NE-1 Negative Positive Effect Effect Neutral No Effect Effect | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
ACH Discussion Points H1- The Board’s Idea H2- The CEO’s Idea - H3- Add vegetarian single - McDonalds must McDonalds must stick offerings with the beef enter the vegan to its core beef offerings as one off choices What to look for in your team market in 2020 with a offerings in 2020 and full vegan menu increasing advertising discussions…be ready to talk about offerings them at readout Fact / Credibilit Source? Importance to Importance to Importance to Assumpti y Hypothesis Hypothesis Hypothesis on Level Do you have a lot of known facts or are many of your assumptions – good or bad, based on Vegan sales up 20% in KF Vegan Associati KF-1 KF-1 KF-3 little to no evidence? [are you basis your 2019 on hypothesis on rumor or opinion?] Heart KF AMA KF-2 KF-2 KF-1 disease increased by 20% in 2017 Are there critical assumptions that need more Beef is less KF AMA KF-3 KF-3 KF-3 investigation? [do you have a significant number expensive of assumptions that require more evidence?] than vegetables Are there a significant number of positive Air freight is KF FAA KF-3 KF-3 KF-3 increasing assumptions that are high priority or low Regulations KF FDA KF-1 KF-1 KF-3 priority? [If all of your positive assumptions are not have changed the significant, it may indicate that you need to do more use of pesticides in investigation or that the hypothesis should be plants discounted] making it harder to use pesticides Are there a significant number of negative Negative Positive high priority assumptions [If you have many high Effect Effect priority assumptions that are negative, it may mean Neutral No that this hypothesis may not yield market Effect Effect competitiveness] Which hypothesis is most viable? Which one did you choose and why? | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Analysis of Competing Hypotheses and Assumptions Check Exercise e Identify all assumptions you can think of about the market exercise 3 Timeframe • Refer to your instruction package handed out for this exercise • You have 60 minutes to complete this exercise • Choose one person to explain discussion points and why you chose your hypothesis • What did you learn from this exercise? • What made this exercise difficult? | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
ACH Steps H1- The Board’s Idea H2- The CEO’s Idea - H3- Add vegetarian single - McDonalds must McDonalds must stick offerings with the beef offerings as one off choices enter the vegan to its core beef market in 2020 with a offerings in 2020 and ON WHITE POST IT NOTES! full vegan menu increasing advertising offerings 1 Collect all the facts [PROS & CONS] – use your situational awareness work to support Fact / Credibilit Source? Importance to Importance to Importance to Assumpti y Hypothesis Hypothesis Hypothesis Level on ON YOUR FLIP CHART SHEET Vegan sales up 20% in KF Vegan Associati KF-1 KF-1 KF-3 2 Outline the various hypotheses [ you may have 2019 on one of your own or this exercise may result in one! Heart KF AMA KF-2 KF-2 KF-1 disease increased by 20% in 2017 ON YOUR FLIP CHART SHEET Beef is less expensive than KF AMA KF-3 KF-3 KF-3 3 Make sure you have sourced all of your vegetables fact/assumptions/ rumors. If it is a rumor indicate with NE Air freight is KF FAA KF-3 KF-3 KF-3 increasing Regulations KF FDA KF-1 KF-1 KF-3 ON APPROPRIATE COLOR POST IT NOTES have changed the use of pesticides in 4 Indicate the importance to the hypothesis with a plants number [3 = low importance, 2 = medium making it harder to use important, 1 = very important] and what effect it pesticides has on the hypothesis with a color [Green=positive effect, Yellow = neutral, Red=negative, gray = no Negative Positive effect] Effect Effect Neutral No ON APPROPRIATE COLOR POST IT NOTES Effect Effect 5 Complete the same process for all of the assumptions you listed. Add other assumptions as you move through the process and brainstorm. They do not have to apply to all of the hypotheses. If they only appeal to one, the others are colored gray. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
ACH Discussion Points H1- The Board’s Idea H2- The CEO’s Idea - H3- Add vegetarian single - McDonalds must McDonalds must stick offerings with the beef enter the vegan to its core beef offerings as one off choices What to look for in your team market in 2020 with a offerings in 2020 and full vegan menu increasing advertising discussions…be ready to talk about offerings them at readout Fact / Credibilit Source? Importance to Importance to Importance to Assumpti y Hypothesis Hypothesis Hypothesis on Level Do you have a lot of known facts or are many of your assumptions – good or bad, based on Vegan sales up 20% in KF Vegan Associati KF-1 KF-1 KF-3 little to no evidence? [are you basis your 2019 on hypothesis on rumor or opinion?] Heart KF AMA KF-2 KF-2 KF-1 disease increased by 20% in 2017 Are there critical assumptions that need more Beef is less KF AMA KF-3 KF-3 KF-3 investigation? [do you have a significant number expensive of assumptions that require more evidence?] than vegetables Are there a significant number of positive Air freight is KF FAA KF-3 KF-3 KF-3 increasing assumptions that are high priority or low Regulations KF FDA KF-1 KF-1 KF-3 priority? [If all of your positive assumptions are not have changed the significant, it may indicate that you need to do more use of pesticides in investigation or that the hypothesis should be plants discounted] making it harder to use pesticides Are there a significant number of negative Negative Positive high priority assumptions [If you have many high Effect Effect priority assumptions that are negative, it may mean Neutral No that this hypothesis may not yield market Effect Effect competitiveness] Which hypothesis is most viable? Which one did you choose and why? | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Template Exercise 3 e Flip Chart Template 1 exercise 3 H1- The Board’s Idea - H2- The CEO’s Idea - McDonalds H3- The BU President’s Idea - Add McDonalds must enter the must stick to its core beef vegetarian single offerings with the beef vegan market in 2020 with a offerings in 2020 and increase offerings as one off choices full vegan menu offerings advertising Market Effects Credibility Source? Importance to Importance to Importance to [Facts / Level Hypothesis Hypothesis Hypothesis Assumption] Vegan sales up KF Vegan KF 1 KF -1 KF 3 20% in 2019 Association Negative Positive Effect Effect Neutral Effect No Effect | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Eliminating bias and building the strategy AM - PART ONE PM - PART TWO our present situational awareness …and where …where are we now?... should we go? WHY DO I WANT TO DO THIS? Strategy Development – Now that you have developed a chosen hypothesis, it is time to run a what if scenario in the event assumption priorities change. 1 2 3 4 contextual environmental view scenarios & key assumptions check Core 5 ecosystem competitive competency what if 6 7 landscape/ scenario 1 build assessment radar screen monitor/ ACH & chosen final report/ adjust hypothesis strategic what if hypothesis/ KPIS mapping hypothesis scenario 2 strategy KPOT execution KALS what if “Hypothesis Mapping” scenario 3 “ACH” Decision makers “Indicators & “What If Analysis” Signposts of “Assumptions Check” “Brainstorming often start here Change” “Quality of Information Alternative Futures” introducing bias! Check” “Devil’s Advocacy” This framework is the property of N. Bulger, 2018 and may not be used without express written consent of the author. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
What happens when the dynamics change? “What ifs” YOUR CHOSEN HYPOTHESIS Take the hypothesis and outline this template on a flip chart with all of the Pros and Cons facts and Assumptions 1 you outlined EXISTING What if Credibility Source? Importance to Importance to Facts / Scenario 1 Level EXISTING HYPOTHESIS Assumptions WHAT IF SCENARIO 1 Create a “What if” Scenario Column as shown and change some of the parameters considering if some of these 2 critical elements changed from the Vegan sales Vegan sales are KF Vegan KF-1 KF-1 existing scenario up 20% in predicted to flat Associatio 2019 line in 2020 n Heart disease Heart disease KF AMA KF-2 KF-1 increased by increased by Make a determination as to whether or 20% in 2017 20% in 2017 changes the importance of the assumption or fact, the source factual 3 Beef is less expensive than Beef prices rise and are in line KF AMA KF-3 KF-1 basis and/or the positive or negative vegetables with vegetables impact on the overall hypothesis Air freight is Air freight is KF FAA KF-3 KF-3 increasing increasing Regulations Regulations KF FDA KF-1 KF-1 have changed have changed the use of the use of pesticides in pesticides in plants making plants making it it harder to use harder to use pesticides pesticides Negative Positive Effect Effect Neutral No Effect Effect | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
“What If” Exercise e Identify all assumptions you can think of about the market exercise 4 Timeframe • Refer to your instruction package handed out for this exercise • You have 20 minutes to complete this exercise • Choose one person to explain discussion points • What did you learn from this exercise? • What made this exercise difficult? | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
What happens when the dynamics change? “What ifs” YOUR CHOSEN HYPOTHESIS Take the hypothesis and outline this template on a flip chart with all of the Pros and Cons facts and Assumptions 1 you outlined EXISTING What if Credibility Source? Importance to Importance to Facts / Scenario 1 Level EXISTING HYPOTHESIS Assumptions WHAT IF SCENARIO 1 Create a “What if” Scenario Column as shown and change some of the parameters considering if some of these 2 critical elements changed from the Vegan sales Vegan sales are KF Vegan KF-1 KF-1 existing scenario up 20% in predicted to flat Associatio 2019 line in 2020 n Heart disease Heart disease KF AMA KF-2 KF-1 increased by increased by Make a determination as to whether or 20% in 2017 20% in 2017 changes the importance of the assumption or fact, the source factual 3 Beef is less expensive than Beef prices rise and are in line KF AMA KF-3 KF-1 basis and/or the positive or negative vegetables with vegetables impact on the overall hypothesis Air freight is Air freight is KF FAA KF-3 KF-3 increasing increasing Regulations Regulations KF FDA KF-1 KF-1 have changed have changed the use of the use of pesticides in pesticides in plants making plants making it it harder to use harder to use pesticides pesticides Negative Positive Effect Effect Neutral No Effect Effect | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
“What If” Discussion Points What to look for in your team discussions…be ready to talk about them at readout Did you see a dynamic shift in credibility of any assumptions? Did the credibility change? [Is it something that WILL happen for certain or something that may happen ?] Did you see a dynamic shift in importance and impact of an assumption? [Is it something that WILL change the impact on your hypothesis or change your mind about your hypothesis? What new issues arise that you will need to pay close attention to? Discuss how you would proceed with these what if scenarios? How will you conduct them and how frequently? How will you monitor and report them? Did it make you think more about your chosen hypothesis? Remember that in real situations, you would still be testing more than your chosen hypothesis. What did you learn from this exercise? What made it difficult? | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Template Exercise 4 Flip Chart e Template 1 exercise 4 H1- Your chosen hypothesis EXISTING Facts What if Scenario Credibility Source? Importance to Importance to / Assumptions 1 Level EXISTING HYPOTHESIS WHAT IF SCENARIO 1 Negative Effect Positive Effect Neutral Effect No Effect | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Eliminating bias and building the strategy AM - PART ONE PM - PART TWO our present situational awareness …and where …where are we now?... should we go? WHY DO I WANT TO DO THIS? Monitoring– It is imperative that we know where we are at all times and that we are monitoring market dynamics in the eco system so that we anticipate rather than react….that we can adjust 1 2 3 4 and be flexible. contextual environmental view scenarios & key assumptions check Core 5 ecosystem competitive competency what if 6 7 landscape/ scenario 1 build assessment radar screen monitor/ ACH & chosen final report/ adjust hypothesis strategic what if hypothesis/ KPIS mapping hypothesis scenario 2 strategy KPOT execution KALS what if “Hypothesis Mapping” scenario 3 “Indicators & “ACH” “What If Analysis” Signposts of “Assumptions Check” “Brainstorming Change” “Quality of Information Alternative Futures” Check” “Devil’s Advocacy” This framework is the property of N. Bulger, 2018 and may not be used without express written consent of the author. | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Discussion about KPIs, KAIs and Dashboards KPI – Key performance indicator What is the difference? KAI – Key achievement indicator One page Graphically multidimensional What should our reporting include? Impact analysis Trends and directional progress Frequency of update | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Summary Discussion Analysis of Competing Hypothesis* How could you apply these Structured Hypothesis Mapping concepts when you return to Analytics work next week? Indicators, Signposts of Change* What would some of the challenges be and why? Devil’s Advocacy** How would you mitigate those challenges? Key Assumptions Check* Competency Analysis Landscape/Eco System Photo by XUNO. on Unsplash | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
Thank you! Questions? Nan Bulger bulgernanette@gmail.com Principal and Founder – Disruptive Dynamics Photo by XUNO. on Unsplash | © 2019 Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC | CI 303 Structured Analysis
You can also read