Chat Room Interventions: Protecting and Respecting Participants - Scott D. Rhodes
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Chat Room Interventions: Protecting and Respecting Participants Scott D. Rhodes Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy Division of Public Health Sciences Wake Forest University School of Medicine
The Internet An important tool for social networking and support, meeting friends and sexual partners, and building community
The Internet and risk for HIV & STD infection More likely to report: • Sex with men and women • Unprotected anal sex • More partners, and • STD infection history
CyBER/M4M Chat room-Based Education and Referral/ Men for Men Chat room HIV prevention intervention designed using CBPR Interventionists trained to serve as health advisors, opinion leaders, community advocates Quantitative and qualitative data collected Rhodes SD, et al. A pilot intervention utilizing Internet chat rooms to prevent HIV risk behaviors among men who have sex with men. Public Health Reports 2010;S1:29-37.
HIV testing Preliminary data suggests disproportionately low rates 37% of CyBER/M4M participants ages 18-62 years old reported testing in past 12 months – 32% of those 25-44 years old Rhodes SD, et al. Comparing MSM in the southeastern US who participated in an HIV prevention chat room-based outreach intervention and those who did not: how different are the baseline HIV-risk profiles? Health Educ Res 2007;23:180-90.
CyBER/testing R21MH082689 CBPR proof-of-concept study Builds on CyBER/M4M Based in natural helping, social cognitive theory, and empowerment education Designed to increase HIV testing through chat room promotion
Implementation CyBER/testing interventionist Insider’s knowledge of MSM communities Housed at community partner agency Every 30 minutes posts standardized theory-based triggers about HIV testing and his availability to provide information and answer questions about testing within the public chat room
Evaluation Brief online behavioral assessment – At pretest and 6-months after initiation of implementation Extant data abstracted from profiles at 3 months • To compare those who participated in the assessment and those that did not
Preliminary findings Pretest At 6 mons OR (95% CI) p (n=346) (n=315) Mean age 37.2 (11.3) 36.9 (11.8) .7 Sex w both 74 (21.4%) 60 (19.0%) .5 Tested for HIV during past 12 months 154 (44.5%) 187 (59.4%) 1.8 (1.4, 2.5)
Respecting chat room MSM • Is this intervention even appropriate given the purpose of the online space for MSM? – Reviewed published community norms and standards – Careful training of all staff to adhere to these guidelines • Safe space and nonintrusive – Part of the key is use of public room • Although this makes other types of online sites difficult (or impossible) to intervene within using this approach: BGClive; Manhunt; Dudesnude; Squirt; Craigslist; SilverDaddies…
Respecting chat room MSM • Low intensity approach • Engagement of interventionist as participant in the chat room • Building trust; being defended for “right” to be in the room by others • Ongoing steering committee review, guidance – Approach, types of triggers and messages, profile representation
What about assessment data? • Recruitment in the public chat room – Not targeting individuals • Low intensity approach • Security of the data
What about those < 18 years old? • Reducing risk of those under 18 years old: – Before providing URL or password through private chat, recruiter asks, "By the way, how old are you?" – If ≥ 18 years old, provides password and URL using private instant messaging – No indication that participants must be ≥18 years old. If the participant is
Consent? Must be brief because of competing priorities of being in the chat room Introductory paragraph on the URL that explains that we are asking the potential participant to participate in a research study that is designed to explore HIV testing rates among men online, participation is voluntary, and all information is anonymous. – Includes Dr Rhodes’ telephone number and e- mail address for questions or concerns, and the IRB Director’s telephone number. – Recruiter’s profile provides further detail • Committed to transparency
Collecting extant profile data Online responses to closed-ended standardized items that are accessible to all within the chat room Considered to be public if anyone can go into the room and read – Eavesdropping or ethnography Moreno MA, Fost NC, Christakis DA. Research ethics in the MySpace era. Pediatrics 2008;121(1):157-61.
Aliases and e-mail addresses Risks associated with abstracting chat room aliases may be minimal given that aliases tend to be unrecognizable (e.g., “Top4U,” “BadBoyNC,” “Almoststr8”) – For some chatters, point is to maintain anonymity We have never seen a chat room alias such as “Scott_Rhodes” E-mail addresses may be different. • For PayPal compensation, etc.
Key to success Community member involvement: what is realistic, what will work Maintain relationships and open communication with IRB and NIH personnel – Understandings and interpretations vary, priorities vary • Participants < 18 years old became problematic for some • NIH Code 44 • Certificate of Confidentiality – Summoned to IRB to show them how the rooms function, ease of entering a chat room, what aliases look like
Chat room interventions The Internet has emerged as an important tool for the delivery of health promotion and disease prevention interventions Multiple questions remain in terms of harnessing the rapidly evolving environment while exhibiting high levels of respect and ensuring the protection of online communities
You can also read