Waiwera bridge - The Construction Of The Waiwera Viaduct - Creating Solutions Together
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Creating Solutions Together Waiwera bridge The Construction Of The Waiwera Viaduct AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Solving the Construction Of Waiwera Bridge Using Balanced Cantilever and Matched Precast Segmental E ti Vi Erection Via O Overhead h dG Gantry t By David Trayner VSL Australia Pty Ltd AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Waiwera Viaduct Together • Part of the ALPURT B2 NZ$330m 7km extension to the motorway north of Auckland A kl d • Delivered to Transit New Zealand by the Northern Gateway Alliance (NGA) • NGA comprises Leighton Contractors, Fulton Hogan, Tonkin & Taylor, URS NZ,, Boffa Miskell & Transit NZ • Major elements of the project include: twin 300m tunnels, several small Super T T’s s & the twin precast segmental balanced cantilever 521m long bridges over the Waiwera River. • Construction of the Waiwera bridge superstructures were executed by a sub alliance between NGA and VSL. The structures were built using match pre- pre- cast segments manufactured on site, erected as balanced cantilevers via an overhead h d placement l t gantry. t AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Form Of Bridge Together • Form of bridge selected for: • Optimum cost solution • Constraints • Cost • Geographical G hi l (steep ( t ravines, i river i flats) fl t ) • Foundations (suited larger spans, high piers) • Road alignment (steeper grades grades, entry exit levels determined by connections to other parts) • Weather constraints (propensity for rain, high wind, river valley / floods) • Environmental sensitivity (native scrub, aesthetics) • Logistics, L i ti limited li it d by b low l level l l bridge b id att Weranui W i Rd AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Form Of Bridge Together • Considerations • Material costs (efficiency - haunched / continuous) • Labour availability & costs • Resource availabilityy existing g plant & personnel. • Combination of standard segments plus variable depth segments • Quality Q lit (precast) ( t) • Safety (maximum rationalisation) • Solution ¾ Balanced Cantilever, pre- pre-cast segmental by over head gantry AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Form Of Bridge Together • Summary • 356 match pre- pre-cast segments (Approx 1.040Km) • 16 spans (2 carriageways i - 8 spans each)h) • Highest point off existing ground level = 30.5m 9 500m3 of concrete • 9,500m • 1,300T of reinforcement • 12,130m2 , of bridgeg deck • 480T of PT (cantilever 173t + continuity 307t) • Segments were “glued” and initial stressed with temp PT Bars B • Min / Max seg wght 50T (midspan (midspan),), 83T (pier) • Min / Max span 64 64.4m 4m / 76m 76m, & 41 41.1m 1m (end span) • Typ segment length 2.9m • Variable depth p 4.3m (pier) (p ) to 2.4m midspanp • 11.7m deck width & nominal 3% cross fall (varying) AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Tunnel entrances at northern h end d off structure AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Typical Sequence • Typical Sequence • Launch Truss so that FSL is on next pier (N) • Place, orientate & nail pier segment (on brg) • Relocate FLCB on to pier N,N launch truss into segment placement position. • Erect cantilever segments “balanced” balanced • Acid etch, Apply epoxy “glue” & apply closure prestress with PT bars • Install permanent PT & stress • Erect Closure Pour Segment & construct closure pour • Install permanent continuity PT, stress & grout AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Gantry Operation • Gantry • Two parallel truss frames to support two overhead gantry winches • Truss was from a project j from HK. Modified from Span by Span simply supported with 46m long spans to become a BC OH Gantry • Overall O ll length l th off 140m 140 maded up off 15 maini elements l t in each truss • Maximum element weight of 26T • Total weight of truss and all its auxiliary components is 730T • Truss height of 4.0m, individual truss widths 1.6m. • Underside of truss sits 7.0m above deck level • End E d spans constructed t t d using i span b by span method th d AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Gantryy Operation p • Gantry (Continued) • The original truss req req’dd lengthening • an additional 40m was added • Extended truss still not long g enough g to launch and place on the longest spans without an intermediate step. • New N truss t required i d the th front f t supportt to t be b placed l d 10m in front of the pier and the rear support to be placed near midspan midspan.. This increased the loads on the deck and meant that full continuity stressing & grouting of the span was required before launching the truss • It also put casting of the diaphragm and segment nailing ili on the th critical iti l path th AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Gantryy Operation p • Gantry (Continued) • The linked criticality of the gantry operation to pier segment erection was solved by erecting the pier segments in advance with a 400t crawler crane crane. • Other challenges: • Precast accuracies – • Duct alignment – strand pushing, ducts leaking • Insert locations • Wet weather – segmental gluing, gluing water damage to controls AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Pakse Gantry Together AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Deep Bay Link Gantry AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together End Span – Span by SPan AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Pier Segment Placing AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Pier Segment Placement AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Pier Segment Erection By Crane AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Pier Segment Erection By Crane AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Segment Casting • Precasting • Two T moulds ld – “A” d designated i t d standard t d d depth d th (2.95 to 2.4m) + “C” variable depth mould (4.3 to 2 95m) – also used to cast the smaller segments 2.95m) • Typ yp cycle y 1 seg gpper day y for stnd depth p 1 to 2 days for more complex variable depth segments • Complex C l segments t had h d castt in i situ it sections ti – diaphragm / deviators. (Gantry limitations). • Each mould had rebar jigs (top & btm separate) • Rebar cages moved by OH Cranes / Forklifts AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Segment Transporter & Straddle Carrier AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Segment Casting • Pre Pre--casting (continued) • Casting yard purpose built factory built on the alignment • Segments g moved using g the transfer carts & straddle carrier. • Segment S t storage t on th the alignment li t • 4% grade in storage area problematic for gantry cranes solved by using Straddle Carrier & segment transporter. • Segment delivered to gantry using Segment Transporter Transporter. • Straddle Carrier ran on a prepared road and was also used to assemble truss AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Segment Storage & Casting Yard on Alignment AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together Casting Yard AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Together AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Segment Casting Together • Pre-casting (Continued) • Challenges • Labour skills, motivation, accuracy, supervision • Concrete 60 MPa – challengingg g spec for long g term creep and shrink properties. • High cement content Proved relatively “sticky” – diffi lti in difficulties i vibration, ib ti req’d ’d high hi h slumps l resulted in problems in concrete “slumping” out of web forms. forms • Moved to high slump with accelerators but “unforgiving” led to removal of accelerators and a final mix with high cement content with target slump of 140mm AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Programme Together • Project awarded on 9th May 2004, TCE completed Dec 2005 • Site handed over Jan 2006 (7 months late) • Pre Pre--casting • 1st segment cast Jun 2006. Last cast 19th Dec 2007, target schedule Sept 2007, best average 32 / mnth • Gantry Operations • Truss commissioned Jan 2007 • 1st Segment placed Jan 2007. Last placed April 2008, target schedule Oct 2007 AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
ALPURT Baseline vs Actual Creating Solutions Together Abutment A2 350 Pier B2 Abutment A1 300 Pier C2 Pier B1 Launch Back to 250 Pier D Pier C1 Cumulative Baseline Casting 200 Pier D As Cast Baseline Erection C 150 As Erected Pier E 100 Pier F Pier G 50 Abutment J1&2 Pier H 0 6/2006 7/2006 8/2006 9/2006 0/2006 1/2006 2/2006 1/2007 2/2007 3/2007 4/2007 5/2007 6/2007 7/2007 8/2007 9/2007 0/2007 1/2007 2/2007 1/2008 2/2008 3/2008 4/2008 5/2008 12/06 12/07 11/08 10/09 10/10 9/11 9/12 8/01 7/02 9/03 8/04 8/05 7/06 7/07 6/08 5/09 5/10 4/11 4/12 3/01 2/02 3/03 2/04 2/05 Week Ending AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Creating Solutions Acknowledgments Together We would like to acknowledge and thank the following f th for their i assistance i t in i the th project j t andd this thi presentation: t ti Transit New Zealand, Leighton Contractors, Fulton Hogan Tonkin & Taylor, Hogan, Taylor URS NZ, NZ Boffa Miskell The Waiwera Bridge is a graceful, efficient and cost effective ff ti structure t t delivered d li d in i challenging h ll i circumstances. The Alliance’s demonstration of its ability in overcoming obstacles has been rewarded by y the award of the Newmarket Viaduct in Auckland with an even more challenging and innovative solution – “W t h Thi “Watch This Space”. S ” AUSTROADS 2009, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
You can also read