ABSTRACT BOOK Foundation Programme Sharing Event - Friday 27th March 2020 - NACT UK
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Foundation Programme Sharing Event Holiday Inn, Carburton Street, London ABSTRACT BOOK Friday 27th March 2020 NACT UK - The “premier place” for practical educational ideas and advice Learn and share across specialties, regions and countries
ORALS 1. Balint groups for Foundation doctors: a pilot project Dr Chris Knight, Dr Emma Salter, Dr Adrian Hayes, Dr Joseph Jameson, Dr Rose–Anne Orrell, Jenny Pickhaver, Lorna Stewart, Katie Fry and Dr Anna Baverstock Background: 50% (range: 27%-75%) medical trainees meet burnout criteria whilst 42% trainees take breaks from training due to poor emotional wellbeing. Physician burnout is associated with poorer patient care, colleague interpersonal relationships and clinician mental health. Balint Groups have been proposed as potential interventions to reduce physician burnout. This project aimed to establish the feasibility of running a foundation doctor Balint group in a hospital environment as well as ascertaining the effect of Balint groups on junior doctor burnout, wellbeing, self-reflection and compassion-fatigue. Method: The project was initiated by Dr Baverstock, Associate Director of Medical Education (Support) and Dr Knight, Foundation Programme Director. All authors were involved in project design, a systematic literature review and monthly project practicality meetings. Methodology was revised by Jenny Pickhaver, Lorna Stewart and Katie Fry, Trust Improvement Team. All foundation year 1 doctors in the Trust (n=22) were invited to attend 10 hour-long weekly Balint group sessions from November 2018 to March 2019. Sessions were co- facilitated by Drs Orrell and Jameson, psychiatry core trainees, with supervision by an accredited Balint group supervisor. Dr Knight collected questionnaires from all foundation doctors before and after the Balint series. Abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory (AMBI), Self-Reflection and Insight Scale (SRIS) and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) physician were used to assess burnout, reflective abilities, and wellbeing. Post-Balint series focus group with foundation doctors and co-facilitator interviews were led and analysed by Dr Hayes, medical psychotherapy registrar, with question co-creation, co- facilitation and transcript collation by Dr Salter, specialty doctor. Results: 3 (14%) doctors completed pre-questionnaires and 14 (64%) post-questionnaires. AMBI scores revealed high emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Mean GHQ-12 score was 11.56. 42% doctors scored at least 12 on GHQ-12, suggesting symptoms of anxiety/depression. Results of SRIS suggest high reflective ability. 7 doctors attended the focus group. Common themes included high doctor stress levels, work-related pressures and internalised beliefs of job-role limiting attendance and a reduced sense of isolation when attending groups. Formal content analysis results are pending and will be available for presentation at the meeting. Key Messages: Balint groups for foundation doctors are feasible and potentially beneficial. Inference from quantitative results is limited given low questionnaire completion. A further quality improvement project is underway following adaptations from practicalities gleaned from this
pilot. Outcome measures have been minimised with aim of improving questionnaire completion. The authors hope ongoing projects will aid in normalising the need for support by providing a therapeutic space to discuss human aspects of caring.
2. Utilising a Treasure Hunt To Reduce Navigation Anxiety Dr Laura Horne and Alistair Heath Working as a junior doctor for the first time is an exciting yet nerve-racking experience. There are numerous sources of anxiety for new doctors, navigation anxiety being one cause. Navigation anxiety is a concern held by an individual about their ability to find important clinical areas, particularly in an emergency. Within our trust, we found that 70% of new FY1 doctors were anxious about their ability to navigate around the hospital when on call. We delivered a ‘Navigation-Busting Treasure Hunt’ to FY1 doctors in their induction week. The FY1 doctors were presented with the challenge of visiting 14 wards/areas of the hospital as directed by their ‘on call’ scenarios. Competing against one another, on arrival at each location the teams collected a alphabetical letter which they pieced together to discover a welcoming anagram. Following the treasure hunt, 50% of FY1s reported to be no longer anxious about their ability to navigate when on call. The average level of navigation confidence increased to 66% (from 28%). We conclude that our ‘navigation-busting treasure hunt’ is an effective, enjoyable and inexpensive way to help to welcome and minimise navigation anxiety amongst new junior doctors.
3. Mid-year review of the mandatory teaching log (lessons learned from Horus ePortfolio) Ms Kata Varnai Background: Foundation doctors (FDs) at the UK Foundation Doctors Advisory Board requested the counting/recording of mandatory teaching attended to be fairer/more transparent/easier to manage. Since 2010 the requirement was “[a]n acceptable attendance record at generic foundation teaching sessions” (“typically 70%”)1. Methods Foundation school directors (FSDs) agreed a new requirement, from August 2019, to attend >60 hours of teaching (>30 hours must be core foundation teaching). All attended teaching must be logged by FDs. The UK Curriculum Delivery Group operationalized this with e- portfolio providers (Horus and Turas). Results: The new process has launched well in Horus. Many FDs log promptly and helpdesk queries are consistently low. There has been some confusion, for example about whether FDs have to upload evidence of attendance. FSDs confirmed this was not required – spreading this message once the year had started was challenging. In November 2019 1/3 of FDs in England had not yet started logging – this was concerning as trying to remember what they attended months later was likely to lead to inaccuracies and increased workload. Key Messages FDs appreciate their feedback being used to affect policy. Changing how teaching is logged has impacted all levels and guidance/reminders are important to ensure FDs meet the requirement for a successful ARCP. References: 1. UKFPO (2017). Foundation Programme Reference Guide 2016 - June 2017 Publication, pages 56 and 69
4. Near-peer video tutorials: a novel approach to preparing new doctors for busy on call shifts Dr Shriya Kumar and Dr Dowan Kwon Background: The transition from student to junior doctor is often stressful and complex. The majority of anxiety surrounding this is associated with working on acute medical and surgical on call shifts. The General Medical Council highlight the importance of delivering an effective induction programme to new doctors.1 Many trusts use electronic learning tools and face- to-face tutorials to deliver this programme. There is a lack of accessible information to prepare new doctors for stressful on call shifts; especially for those whose first encounter with these shifts is several days to weeks following the induction programme. Methods: The aim of our innovative online-based YouTube tutorials was to clearly explain the structure of clinical on call shifts; which was hospital-specific, near-peer, accessible online, and importantly, could be assimilated by the new starters within their own time. We created, recorded and distributed these video guides using social media.2,3,4 We used questionnaires to receive feedback. Results: The video tutorials were well received by the new doctors. The overwhelming majority felt subjectively more confident and prepared for their first on call shift. Key Messages By using social media and digital technology, we provided a succinct and valuable learning resource for preparing new doctors for their new roles within our hospital. References: 1. Williams M, Mathieu S. Effective departmental inductions for doctors in training. Sharing good practice. General Medical Council UK. 2. Kwon D, Kumar S. A quick guide to Surgical on calls. 2019. https://youtu.be/HunkLeIMOPM 3. Kwon D, Kumar S. A quick guide to Medical on calls. 2019. https://youtu.be/XQa_myYGX9M 4. Kwon D, Kumar S. Weekend Handovers. 2019. https://youtu.be/ACt7TUTufTk
5. Choose Psychiatry: Bristol Autumn School 2019 Dr Stephanie Upton, Dr Sally Stuart and Dr Kate Franklin Background: There is a recruitment crisis in psychiatry, with only 82% of core training posts filled in 20181. The Bristol Autumn Psychiatry School is an event aimed at Foundation doctors to promote interest in a career in psychiatry. Since its introduction in 2013, core training fill rates in Severn Deanery have increased from 75% to 100%. Methods: The event took place on October 10th and 11th 2019. It featured a varied program of activities including a communication skills session, a networking event with different sub-specialties, a drama performance and a museum visit. Results: 44 people applied for 30 places, 24 attended. 96% of attendees rated the event overall as “excellent”. There was a significant increase in self-reported likelihood of applying for core psychiatry training after the event vs pre event and increased likelihood of applying to Severn deanery specifically. Qualitative feedback was overwhelmingly positive. Key Messages • Psychiatry recruitment is in crisis • Autumn or summer schools offer an appealing, engaging and effective way to foster an interest in psychiatry as a career for Foundation doctors • Attendees to the Bristol School stated they were significantly more likely to apply to core psychiatry training generally and Severn Deanery specifically after the event. References: 1) Health Education England North West (2018) CT1 Psychiatry fill rates 2018. Available at: https://www.nwpgmd.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/Round 1 %26 R1 Re-advert Aug 2018 - CT1 Psych Fill Rates - For Web Site.pdf (Accessed: 9 December 2019)
6. Non- Clinical Masterclass on ‘Quality Improvement’ for Foundation Doctors within the EOE Foundation School Dr Zilley Khan, Fiona Greenfield, Dr H Barker, Dr H Johnson, Dr R Banerjee Background: Keeping the focus on Quality Improvement (QI) at a time of transformation is vitally important. The national framework ‘Developing People – Improving Care1’ emphasises the delivery of continuous improvements in health care services ie build cultures of continuous improvement. The Academy of Medical Royal colleges also state QI should be put at the heart of medical training.2 Limb’s report revealed ‘all doctors should have access to training in QI, which should be made “part of the mindset”.3 QI has at least as much potential to improve outcomes for patients as cardio-pulmonary resuscitation, was highlighted. 3 It sets out how the General Medical Council, medical schools, and medical royal colleges should make the necessary changes in undergraduate and postgraduate education to incorporate QI. Among the key recommendations is a “progressive curriculum” in QI activity which should underpin all training stages of a doctor and all trainees should have access to QI training. 3 All Foundation Programme doctors are expected to participate and complete a QI project for their sign off. 4 Strong evidence reveals that junior doctors may face a number of problems and barriers in doing worthwhile QI projects. Some of these include lack of understanding by more senior medical staff of the QI methodology 5 and lack of effective formal training. 5,6,7 Since September 2017 Royal Papworth Hospital has been offering QI masterclasses to foundation trainee enrolled with the East Anglia foundation School. These masterclasses have been delivered by QI fellows who undertook a two year fellowship programme offered by HEEOE and delivered by the ‘King Fund’. Methods: Since 2017 to date we have ran an average of 3 workshops per year. Feedback in the form of surveys post masterclass have been collated and reviewed. Results: There is clear evidence from the feedback that these masterclasses are very well received and those that attend appreciated the learning. A detailed breakdown of the results will follow in the oral or poster presentation. Key Messages: QI methodology masterclasses needs to be a mandatory part of junior doctors teaching programme.
7. Careers promotion events for Foundation Doctors Dr Preethi Gopinath, Mrs Judith Butcher and Mrs Margaret Short Background: Many foundation doctors are not applying for specialty training resulting in applications being at an all-time low in the UK. There are numerous reasons for this including the current political climate, NHS resources and ‘burn out’. Princess Alexandra Hospital developed several careers afternoons promoting the range of specialities using different methods to engage trainees. Methods: A doodle poll was carried out for all foundation doctors within the trust asking about which specialities they were interested in. From that information, trainees from 12 different specialities were invited to talk. A speaker on taking a non-training year. There were 5 rooms being used with simultaneous presentations occurring at the same time. Results: We received 40 feedback forms. 100% of doctors found the afternoon useful. 95% of doctors felt that all their questions had been answered and 100% of doctors would recommend the afternoon to a peer. Doctors were asked to rate the afternoon on a scale from 1 to 5, with 5 being excellent. The mean average rating was 4.88. Key Messages: Career afternoons can provide a great way of providing information. Feb 2020 Careers Hub day is planned using a “speed dating” method to improve exposure to lesser known specialties, data will follow in presentation if successful.
8. “Virtual Oncall” – innovative virtual patient simulation training for Foundation doctors Dr Junaid Fukuta, Alan Coombs and James Dalton Background Anxiety amongst new F1 doctors is high and the unfamiliarity in the management of acute medical conditions contributes to this (Tallentire et al, 2012). NHS Trusts utilise simulation training to better prepare F1s, but requires huge resources in faculty, cost and time. We looked for a technology based solution to help reduce the resources required, the result is our virtual patient simulations (VPS): “Virtual On call.” Methods: Virtual On call utilises an innovative first-person perspective to mimic the viewers’ experience of actually seeing and managing acutely unwell patients. To add realism, we used video and embedded decision making points that alter the patient’s outcome, allowing the viewer to experience the visual, audio and emotional impact managing these patients involves. Results: We carried out a randomized controlled trial between our VPS against standard simulation training (n=40). We found no significant difference in subsequent clinical performance but an increased knowledge gain with our VPS. With these results they are now embedded in four hospitals F1 teaching programmes. Key Messages: Virtual On call is a low resource educational tool that is comparable to traditional simulation training. It helps prepare Foundation doctors for the management of acute medical conditions and is now being used in their training. References Tallentire VR, Smith SE, Skinner J and Cameron HS (2012) The preparedness of UK graduates in acute care: a systematic literature review. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 88: 365 – 371.
9. Near-Peer Mentorship Scheme for Foundation Doctors: How to Increase Engagement using the PDSA Cycle Dr Jordan Moxley, Dr Samuel Haynes and Dr Huma Naqvi Background The transition from medical student to doctor is associated with increased stress, with new doctors feeling unprepared and unsupported.1,2 We established a Near-Peer Mentorship (NPM) Scheme in 2017/18 between Foundation Year 1 and 2 (FY1/FY2) doctors to provide additional support. NPM is highly effective but associated with challenges such as lack of engagement.3,4 To increase engagement, we made improvements to the scheme using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle5. Methods 17 FY2 mentors were recruited to participate in the 2019/20 NPM Scheme. Mentors were matched to FY1s on concurrent rotations and asked to meet approximately twice per rotation. Improvements included use of an application process, formal training through E- Learning and reallocation of groups to address non-engagement. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected through face-to-face meetings and online surveys. Results Questionnaire data showed increased engagement, with 88% of FY1s in contact with their mentor, compared to 40% in the previous year. FY1 experiences on the Scheme improved; 100% of FY1s who met their mentors found the experience helpful, compared to 92% previously. Key Messages NPM is an effective way of providing support for FY1s. Introducing an application process, formal training and group reallocation increases engagement and improves FY1 experiences on the Scheme. References [1] Brennan, N., Corrigan, O., Allard, J., Archer, J., Barnes, R., Bleakley, A., Collett, T. and de Bere, S. (2010). The transition from medical student to junior doctor: today’s experiences of Tomorrow’s Doctors. Medical Education, 44(5), pp.449-458. [2] Kellett, J., Papageorgiou, A., Cavenagh, P., Salter, C., Miles, S. and Leinster, S. (2015). The preparedness of newly qualified doctors – Views of Foundation doctors and supervisors. Medical Teacher, 37(10), pp.949-954. [3] Peterson A., Monaghan H. (2019). Near-peer mentorship: a pilot programme to improve support for new doctors. BMJ Leader 2019;3:11-14. [4] Srinivasan A, Tadros M, Nelson I, et al. (2019). Foundation mentorship scheme pilot programme: is near-peer mentorship an effective way to look after incoming FY1s? BMJ Leader 2019;3:A6. [5] NHS Improvement. (2019). Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles and the model for improvement, [online] Available at https://improvement.nhs.uk/documents/2142/plan-do- study-act.pdf. [Accessed 5 Dec. 2019]
Posters 1. 60 hours taught programme: a chance for change Dr H Johnson, Dr H Barker, Dr R Banerjee, Dr Z Khan, Dr C Lui, Mr M Bullock, Dr E Boddy Background: At school visits to local trusts, trainee mixed feedback around generic teaching was common with themes of the teaching subject and quality, the type of teaching, being predominantly lecture based with a preference for interaction and simulation, and the difficulties in attending and then returning to the ward to catch up on missed time. Methods: In 2018-2019 we implemented a 60 hour taught programme pilot where having listened to feedback, we increased our simulation and interactive elements, created half day masterclasses sub regional teaching, though the generic training programme still made the majority of the hours. We asked one of our foundation fellows to review our foundation trainee feedback on the generic teaching they received from local trusts. Following the national roll out of the 60 hours taught programme, and based on our education fellow feedback, we decreased the local generic teaching element, increased the trainee choice options, further increased simulation opportunities. We are now evaluating both feedback of individual events, and trainee overall satisfaction. Results: Our foundation trainees wished for valued high quality teaching, aligned to their curriculum and career needs choice and autonomy in attendance. Interim results suggest our new programme is valued by trainees. Key Messages: Bold changes to foundation teaching increase trainee satisfaction.
References: 1. Junior doctors don’t get enough teaching BMJ 2011; 342 :d2246 2. https://heeoe.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/taught_programme_3030_final_2019_1.pdf 3. What do doctors value from generic teaching in the uk foundation programme? Eleanor Boddy, Alex Rowland, Helen Johnson AMEE Vienna 2019 poster presentation 4. Bellman L. A qualitative evaluation of senior house officers’ teaching and learning: towards sharing good practice. Med Teach. 2004;26(4):313–20. 5. Oliver J. Ziff & Monica Samra (2016) Junior doctor led teaching programme provides insight for incoming Foundation doctors, Medical Teacher, 38:1, 105, DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1056128 6. Paul S. Richman, Doreen M. Olvet, Sahar Ahmad & Latha Chandran (2019) Use of student feedback to drive quality improvement (QI) in a preclinical U.S. medical school course, Medical Education Online, 24:1, DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1583968
2. Psychiatry teaching for Foundation doctors on placement. Dr Stephanie Upton and Dr Alice Pitt Background: Almost 50% of doctors will complete a psychiatry placement during their Foundation Programme1. This is a valuable opportunity to improve knowledge of mental health and encourage interest in a career in psychiatry. Crucial to these aims is ensuring adequate opportunities for learning. Psychiatry-specific teaching is one possible way of facilitating this. Methods: Two cohorts of Foundation doctors (15 in total) on psychiatry rotations in Bristol received biweekly hour-long small group teaching sessions. Topics were decided via focus groups and included mental state examination, common psychiatric presentations, and psychopharmacology. Pre and post questionnaires measured teaching quality, self-rated knowledge and confidence on psychiatry topics and attitudes towards a career in psychiatry. Results: 100% of cohort 1 respondents strongly agreed the teaching was useful and relevant to their current role and that it made them think more positively about a career in psychiatry. Free text feedback praised the informal nature of the sessions, that the topics were chosen by the learners themselves and the level of interactivity. Cohort 2 results are awaited. Key messages: • Small group teaching improved self-rated knowledge and confidence in dealing with mental health issues • Foundation doctors felt more positive towards a career in psychiatry after receiving teaching References: 1) Health Education England Broadening the Foundation Programme: Recommendations and Implementation Guidance. HEE, 2014.
3. Professional and cultural integration of overseas doctors into NHS practice; a qualitative study Dr Joe Wild, Dr Sophie Lightbody, Bruce Kerr, Dr Ratna Makker Background: A third of UK doctors trained overseas (Jalal et al, 2019). Recruiting bodies are responsible for ensuring they receive sufficient support to adapt to working in the NHS. To help improve the existing induction programme, we analysed the experiences of a sample of newly recruited overseas doctors in the East of England. Methods: The doctors were offered two training days prior to starting their Foundation Year One (FY1) posts in 2019, including simulation based education preceded by a human factors workshop (skills in adaptability, proactivity, optimism and empathy). Four months later they were invited to participate in a focus group to assess the impact of the training on their new role. Results: Many reported challenges of high workloads and task prioritisation, compounded by pressure from colleagues to perform tasks efficiently. The majority felt underprepared for their FY1 role and shared experiences of cultural, social and language barriers. Key messages: Commencing work as an FY1 is daunting for any newly qualified doctor. Those who trained overseas face additional challenges to apply their training and navigate an unfamiliar system. Feedback from these doctors is an invaluable resource which we are examining to further improve the programme. References: 1. Jalal M, Bardhan KD, Sanders D, Illing J. INTERNATIONAL: Overseas doctors of the NHS: migration, transition, challenges and towards resolution. Future Healthc J. 2019;6(1):76–81. doi:10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-76
4. Using Balint Groups to encourage reflection in F1 doctors Dr Francesca Crawly, Mrs Kate Read, Dr Alexandra Rowland Background: Reflection is paramount to good medical practice. The GMC state that ‘reflecting (on these experiences) is vital to personal wellbeing and development, and to improving the quality of patient care’ and that ‘group reflection often leads to ideas or actions that can improve patient care’. 1 It is recognized, particularly following the Bawa Garda case in 2018, that trainees are anxious about written reflection.2 Methods: Following a study in 2018-19 involving foundation trainees in the East of England, we established many prefer informal reflection with an experienced facilitator over formal written reflection. The FT felt that discussion with more experienced doctors stimulated higher levels of thought processing and appeared to achieve deeper learning, yet they struggled to recognise that these encounters formed an important part of the authentic learning process.3 From October 2019 we have offered all F1 in a DGH the opportunity to participate in monthly Balint groups. These are facilitated by two senior educators in the trust. Following each session all participants are sent an electronic certificate which they were encouraged to upload to eportfolio, acknowledging their participation in a reflective group. Results: Ongoing feedback is universally positive and will be collated and presented.
5. Teaching Foundation Doctors a new way of communicating with vulnerable patients. Dr Adrian Marsh, Ms Mary Johnson and Dr Jenni Rowlands Background: Foundation doctors need to demonstrate understanding of safeguarding principles, manage situations where safeguarding concerns exist, communicate in challenging circumstances and facilitate patients making informed decisions. Methods: The Joint Training Team at Shropshire Council facilitated “My Enquiry and Safety Plan cards” training. The cards were co-produced with individuals who have care and support needs in Shropshire, in conjunction with advocacy services and independent organisations. Training was delivered in small groups using the cards and “four and one questions”. Teaching included; Mental Capacity assessment, Best Interest Decisions, RESPECT and group work on case based discussions exploring safeguarding concerns in different circumstances. In particular, teaching focused on words and phrases that individual patients understand, therefore meeting the objective of making safeguarding personal and empowering the patient. Results: Feedback demonstrated whilst this was a new way of communicating, it was critical in ensuring that the conversation and outcome should be based around that person’s needs. This approach will change how Foundation Doctors have conversations with vulnerable groups. Key Messages: Patient centred communication training is essential, enjoyable and deliverable using an innovative card based system, improving patient centred outcomes in vulnerable groups.
6. The Empathy, Resilience and Self-Compassion Study: a longitudinal cohort study of Foundation Doctors Dr Daniel Turton and Dr Bill Kawai-Calderhead Background: The GMC National Trainee Survey shows that amongst doctors-in-training, Foundation Doctors (FDs) have the highest level of burnout. This may partly explain the ever-falling number that progress directly into speciality-training. It is debatable whether doctors protect themselves from burnout by adopting a position of ‘detached concern’ or, conversely, whether resilience is enhanced by encouraging more empathic behaviours. This study aims to elucidate this issue; and see whether self-compassion – a trainable quality – is correlated with either empathy or resilience. Methods: Longitudinal cohort study of Foundation Year 1 doctors (F1s). Three validated self-reporting tools administered with demographic survey. Repeat surveys to be carried out at six and eleven months. Analysed in Excel using Spearman’s rank-order correlation. Results: 189 F1s at participating Trusts completed initial surveys (response rate 96.4%). Positive correlation demonstrated between resilience and self-compassion (r=0.507, p
7. Increased Resilience In Foundation Doctors Through The Nation’s First Clinical Leadership Apprenticeship. Can This Be True? Capt Bill Kawai-Calderhead RAMC and Roddy Christie Background: Clinician resilience and wellbeing is a national focus1,2. Over 25% of foundation doctors (FDs) exhibit pathological anxiety3. FDs have the highest level of trainee burnout4; this ‘occupational phenomenon’5 significantly increases patient safety events6. Locally provided FD-supporting initiatives are needed to reduce this burden. Methods: Foundation Leadership and Management (FLM), England’s first clinical leadership apprenticeship7, is sustainably funded through trusts’ Apprenticeship Levy. Enrollment is voluntary. The 12-month modular, spiral curriculum includes self awareness, emotional intelligence and quality improvement. Enrolled and non-enrolled FDs receive module workshops, however, enrolled FDs meet monthly with a dedicated leadership coach and receive a national qualification on completion. Impact evaluation includes measuring FDs’ resilience Results: 2018-19 FDs’ resilience (Brief Resilience Scale8) prior to starting clinical practice was compared to 5-7 months after. Resilience increased in 70% of enrolled FDs (n=17) whilst decreased in 70% of non-enrolled (n=10) and military FDs (n=8)9,10. Key messages: Supporting FDs’ and their resilience locally is a national focus. Resilience increased in 70% of FDs enrolled in the FLM apprenticeship. Given all FDs receive workshops, could the difference be the leadership coach? The 2019-20 FD cohort (n=198), including a control group (n=51), will offer greater statistical power in time for the conference. References: 1. BMA. (2018). Supporting health and wellbeing at work. London: BMA. 2. BMJ. (2019). Wellbeing campaign. [Internet]. Available from https://www.bmj.com.wellbeing [Accessed 01/12/2019]. 3. Van Hamel, C. and Jenner, L. (2015) Prepared for practice? A national survey of UK foundation doctors and their supervisors. Medical Teacher 37:181-88. 4. General Medical Council. (2019) National training surveys 2019: initial finding report. London: GMC. 5. WHO. (2019). Burn-out an “occupational phenomenon”: international classification of diseases. [Internet]. Available from https://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/burn- out/en/ [Accessed 18/11/2019]. 6. Panagioti, M., Geraghty, K. and Johnson, J. et al. (2018). Association between physician burnout and patient safety, professionalism, and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine 178(10):1317-1330. 7. Skills For Health. (2018). Can a doctor be an apprentice? [Internet]. Available from https://haso.skillsforhealth.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/2018.12.05-South- Tees-case- study-v2.pdf [Accessed 14/12/2018].
8. Smith, B.W., Daley, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P. and Bernard, J. (2008). The Brief Resilience Scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioural Medicine 15:194-200. 9. Kawai-Calderhead, B. and Christie, R. (2019). Doctors As Apprentices. In ASME ASM 2019: sustainability, transformation and innovation in medical education. Glasgow, 04/07/2019. 10. Kawai-Calderhead, B. and Christie, R. (2019). You’re hired! Clinical leadership apprenticeships: a national first at South Tees. In Royal College of Physicians presidential visit to South Tees. Middlesbrough, 29/11/2019.
8. £200 million of apprenticeship funding available - use it or lose it! 3 years of clinical leadership and management apprenticeships, and still going. Capt Bill Kawai-Calderhead RAMC and Roddy Christie Background: Medical leadership and management (LM) is core to clinical practice1,2; poor application causes poor patient outcomes3-5. Standardised, sustainable training is lacking whilst clinician burnout, which increases patient safety incidents6, is a national concern7,8. Burnout in foundation doctors (FDs) is the highest amongst trainees9. NHS England trusts, through the apprenticeship scheme, can access ring-fenced funding for wokplace-based, nationally benchmarked LM training. £200million remains unspent and some trusts are now losing funding back to government monthly10. Methods: In partnership with a trust, Foundation Leadership and Management (FLM) FD programme was launched in 201711. Believed to be a national first, FLM lasts 12 months, is mapped to FDs’ clinical curriculum and offers a nationally recognised LM qualification11. Results: FLM-enrolled FDs show statistically significant increased confidence in LM domains and 70% show increased self-rated resilience12. FLM is now delivered in three trusts, and adapted trust-grade, core trainee, consultant and ward manager programmes are delivered13. Key messages: FLM proves apprenticeship scheme adaptability in providing clinical LM programmes which positively impact on learners’ LM skills and resilience. With £200million unspent, and funding being taken back, there exists a time-pressured opportunity to establish local LM initiatives bespoke to support staff of any profession and level. References: 1. General Medical Council. (2018) Outcomes for graduates. London: GMC. 2. Faculty of Medical Leadership and Management. (2018) Medical Leadership and management: an indicative undergraduate curriculum. London: Faculty of Medical Leadership and Management. 3. Berwick D. (2013) A promise to learn – a commitment to act: improving the safety of patients in England. London: Department of Health. 4. Francis R. (2013) Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationary Office. 5. The King’s Fund (2013). Patient-centred leadership: rediscovering our purpose. London: The King’s Fund. 6. Panagioti, M., Geraghty, K. and Johnson, J. et al. (2018). Association between physician burnout and patient safety, professionalism, and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine 178(10):1317-1330. 7. BMA. (2018). Supporting health and wellbeing at work. London: BMA. 8. BMJ. (2019). Wellbeing campaign. [Internet]. Available from https://www.bmj.com.wellbeing [Accessed 01/12/2019]. 9. General Medical Council. (2019) National training surveys 2019: initial finding report. London: GMC.
10. Unison. (2019). Apprenticeship restrictions mean hundreds of millions of NHS funds going to waste, says Unison. [Internet]. Available from https://www.unison.org.uk/news/press-release/2019/10/apprenticeship-restrictions-mean- hundreds-millions-pounds-nhs-funds-going-waste-says-unison/ [accessed 01/11/2019]. 11. Skills For Health. (2018). Can a doctor be an apprentice? [Internet]. Available from https://haso.skillsforhealth.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/2018.12.05-South- Tees-case- study-v2.pdf [Accessed 14/12/2018]. 12. Kawai-Calderhead, B. and Christie, R. (2019). Doctors As Apprentices. In ASME ASM 2019: sustainability, transformation and innovation in medical education. Glasgow, 04/07/2019. 13. Kawai-Calderhead, B. and Christie, R. (2019). You’re hired! Clinical leadership apprenticeships: a national first at South Tees. In Royal College of Physicians presidential visit to South Tees. Middlesbrough, 29/11/2019.
9. Laying the Foundation for Foundation Programme Directors. Ms Lynn Wilson, Dr Lorraine Parks, Ms Karen Moore Background: Foundation Programme Directors (FPDs) are responsible for ensuring that Trust Foundation Training meets the quality standards set by the General Medical Council (GMC) and the UK Foundation Programme Curriculum. In Northern Ireland we had no formal FPD induction via the Foundation School. We therefore developed a regional induction programme for new appointees and established FPDs. Methods: The content of the induction programme was developed, based on the standards outlined in the GMC Promoting Excellence document [GMC] (2015). Areas covered included recruitment, portfolio completion, study leave and ARCPs. This was delivered to the new appointees in a small group setting and feedback was collated using a questionnaire with a Likeart scale. Feedback was used to improve the content of the induction for subsequent delivery. Results: All new FPDs have completed the induction and it has been rolled out to established FPDs. Feedback is overwhelmingly positive with minor areas for change. All aspects were rated as either very useful or extremely useful. Ongoing feedback will be used to develop updates and an educational programme of relevance to the FPD role. Key messages: All FPDs found the induction content relevant and beneficial. We recommend a formal induction and educational program for all FPDs. References: General Medical Council., (2015). Promoting excellence: standards for medical education and training. Manchester: General Medical Council.
You can also read