5 steps towards a zero waste event - WasteMINZ
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The evolution of WasteMINZ RESTAURANT WASTE: SOURCES & CAUSES may 2014 issue 150 $9.00 5 steps towards a zero Fisher & Paykel: 20 years of waste event recycling success Community engagement in Auckland More for your money
Get More Efficient Storage Bulk storage solutions which are flexible, durable and cost effective are essential elements of well-designed transfer stations and recycling facilities. Achieving this mix of storage characteristics allows you to maximise the use of available storage space, and increases efficiency. Interbloc has been providing flexible, durable, and change. With one tonne of solid concrete in each cost effective bulk storage solutions to the waste modular block, the Interbloc solution delivers the management and recycling industry for over 10 durability to withstand the harsh environment of years. Our unique modular wall system provides transfer stations and recycling facilities. We also unparalleled flexibility. Storage bunkers can be easily deliver incredible cost effectiveness. and quickly erected, and modified as requirements If you want to maximise your storage capabilities, we can help. www.interbloc.co.nz 0800 468 375
on the cover Living the zero waste message at 8 Splore 2014 the evolution of Photo: Jason Burgess/burgseye wasteminz Paul Evans reports on the key areas of focus for WasteMINZ over the past few years. 12 12 LEAVE NO TRACE Paul Evans interviews Dave Watson about the innovative approach taken towards event waste management at Chief executive officer Splore 2014. Paul Evans \ +64 9 476 7172 paul@wasteminz.org.nz Membership manager 16 Carole Inglis \ +64 9 476 7163 FISHER & PAYKEL: 20 carole@wasteminz.org.nz YEARS OF RECYCLING Simon Wilkinson outlines the Office manager achievements of the Fisher & Paykel CJ Dooner \ +64 9 476 7162 appliance recycling programme. cj@wasteminz.org.nz Sector group co-ordinator Jenny Marshall \ +64 9 476 7162 20 jenny@wasteminz.org.nz Sector projects manager 20 PEOPLE, PASSION & WAsTE Nic Quilty \ +64 9 476 7167 Paul Evans highlights the community nic@wasteminz.org.nz engagement underpinning Auckland Council’s work in targeting zero waste Editor, revolve Kim Mundell \ +64 21 655 917 by 2040. wasteminz@gmail.com design, revolve Leanne Lassman \ +64 21 267 3885 24 RESTAURANT FOOD leanne@electrichedgehog.co.nz WASTE: identifying the T +64 9 476 7162 SOURCES & CAUSES PO Box 305426, Triton Plaza, North Shore 0757 Tess Drewitt shares the results of Unit 1B, 5 Ceres Court, Rosedale, Auckland her Master’s thesis into the causes 0632 New Zealand of restaurant waste in Sweden, the 26 www.wasteminz.org.nz Netherlands and China. 26 WasteMINZ is the authoritative voice on waste and resource recovery in New Zealand, and seeks to achieve ongoing and positive development of our industry. MORE FOR YOUR MONEY Sue Coutts champions the role of WasteMINZ publishes Revolve magazine five social and community enterprise times a year, it plays a vital role in ensuring in reconciling profitability with the our members are up-to-date with the latest in industry news, policy and legislative changes common good. as well as innovations and advances. ISSN 2324-5417 (Print) regulars ISSN 2324-5425 (Online) 4 from paul's desk 5 your board 6 NEWS BITES 10 Ministry for the environment 30 Sector groups 32 COUNCIL NEWS 34 events 35 gold + silver members
from paul's desk Talk to me +64 9 476 7172 Paul Evans, CEO, WasteMINZ paul@wasteminz.org.nz We are one third of the way through of issues, from behaviour change, business and community enterprise the year already, and boy is time to waste data, as well as what’s on (page 26). flying by. So much has already the Ministry for the Environment’s I’d also like to draw your happened and we’ve got much horizon. attention to an article I’ve written more to come for you. I must extend my sincere thanks (page 8) about WasteMINZ’ Early April saw another very to all those who presented at the journey over the past few years, successful WasteMINZ Roundup, Roundup; once again the standard so as a valued member you have in Queenstown. We were truly of presentations was incredibly a strong understanding of where delighted to hold the Roundup in high and I was impressed with the the organisation has come from, the South Island; it had been some innovative and collaborative work how we have evolved, where we time since a WasteMINZ event that is happening right across the are going and how your Board is had been held in the mainland. It country. I would also like to thank working for you. was great to be back, as we want all those who made the effort to Our attention now turns to to ensure that our events remain attend as well as the significant the conference which is being accessible for our many South Island contributions of our supporting held in Wellington from 20 to 23 members. partner, the Ministry for the October. Very shortly, we will be This year the Roundup Environment and the team from announcing the conference theme programme included a stream CRN (particularly Marty Hoffart and and putting out our call for papers, on “Council, Community and Sue Coutts) who supported us in so I encourage you to start thinking Commercial sectors Collaborating” bringing the C4 stream together. about what projects and initiatives (C4 for short), where the vital role This edition of revolve very much you would like to showcase. The that each of these sectors play in builds upon the collaborative theme success of our conference is very achieving better waste and resource of the Roundup, in particular, articles much determined by the positive recovery outcomes was explored. I on Auckland Council’s work towards participation of our members. believe this collaborative approach creating a positive movement is very much the way of the future of change through innovative and I am confident that WasteMINZ community engagement strategies can play a significant role in ensuring (page 20) and Sue Coutts of the effective cooperation. Our general Community Recycling Network stream addressed a broad range writes on the collaboration between how to CONTACT YOUR BOARD MEMBERS Paul Bishop Chair Darren Patterson Deput y chair Grahame Christian \ EnviroWaste Services Ltd \ Patterson Environmental \ Smart Environmental paul.bishop@envirowaste.co.nz darren@pattersonenvironmental.co.nz grahamec@smartenvironmental.co.nz 4
Paul Bishop Your Board paul.bishop@envirowaste.co.nz Having been involved with the waste play an active and positive role in under Paul Evans’ leadership, and industry over the last eleven years, shaping the future direction of the the Board believes that WasteMINZ I consider it a privilege to be on the organisation. The Board are your is now well placed for the years to WasteMINZ Board and to have been elected representatives and we are come. As part of future-proofing the Chair for the last five years. all available should there ever be a the organisation, I am pleased to WasteMINZ Board members matter you’d like to discuss. You will announce that WasteMINZ has take their roles very seriously and find all of our contact details below, recently purchased its own modest all members volunteer a significant so please reach out if you ever feel offices in Albany, which we will move amount of time to ensure that the need. into early in the new financial year. the organisation has high quality If I were to reflect on years gone The move is about ensuring governance and is continuing to by, WasteMINZ has often been a the organisation has appropriate advance services and support challenging organisation to run from facilities to support our members for our members in a positive a financial standpoint. We had some and it reduces overall cost of manner. This can be difficult very lean years where the future of accommodation within the annual given the diversity of opinions the organisation was far less secure operations budget. The purchase and ideals within our membership than it is today. (Our Chief Executive has been fully funded from financial base, as well as the ever present Paul Evans outlines this in his article reserves, meaning the organisation challenges of managing a not-for- on page 8). Effective planning, and has not incurred any debt. The profit organisation in a sustainable an extremely prudent approach to move will be positive in terms of manner. WasteMINZ has been financial management has enabled cash flow, and with more space, operating for over a quarter of a real turnaround. This successful gives the group increased options a century, and a key part of the approach has always been with the for the future. Board’s duty of care is to ensure that best interests of the organisation I strongly encourage you to read the organisation is well placed to and its members in mind and we Paul’s article. It will give you more operate for another 25 years, while have been successful in maintaining details on the office purchase as continuing to provide excellent costs to members while at the well as an excellent understanding value to our members. same time strengthening the of where we have come from and Along with these considerations, organisation’s balance sheet. where we are going. we are very aware that our members We have consolidated our must have the opportunity to position over the last two years John Dragicevich Simonne Eldridge Dominic Salmon \ Auckland Council \ Tonkin & Taylor \ Hastings District Council john.dragicevich@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz seldridge@tonkin.co.nz dominics@hdc.govt.nz may 2014 \ WWW.WASTEMINZ.ORG.NZ \ 5
News Bites MOVERS & SHAKER Gwilym van Hoffen Gwilym van Hoffen has shifted back into his role as director of niche consultant firm, AMPL Consulting, following completion of a 3-year contract with Auckland Council’s Solid Waste Unit. The contract role was to oversee the development and adoption of Auckland’s first combined Waste Management and Minimisation Plan (WMMP), and CarTakeBack the subsequent Solid Waste Bylaw and operational controls. Ongoing takes Silver delivery of the WMMP’s suite of waste minimisation initiatives has now been handed over to council’s solid waste team, who will see the WasteMINZ welcomes new Silver cars. Their service begins with changes through procurement and member, CarTakeBack New Zealand an instant car valuation via the on to their ‘go-live’ launch, from Limited, the organisation behind ScrapCarRecycling.co.nz website 2015/16 onwards. the innovative ScrapCarRecycling. and ends with a certificate of destruction providing reassurance gwilym@vanhoffen.com co.nz website. After experiencing an encouraging response from the to car owners that their car has public and participating scrapyards been properly disposed of. Behind welcome to our and dismantlers since their launch the scenes, FADS integrates the in February 2012, CarTakeBack activities of the network. Every new members is expanding its operational and transaction is monitored in real-time, SILVER promotional activities in the North from car valuations and purchases to Scrap Car Recycling and South Islands. car de-registration and the recycling Their car recycling initiative is process, to the benefit of both the CORPORATE founded upon two key principles: network and the authorities. Hydrotech Drainage & Plumbing the guarantee of a fair price to The recent launch of CharityCar. SMALL BUSINESS the disposers of old cars, be they org.nz, allows people to donate Eco-Pal members of the public, government the value of their old car to great Pete's Takeaways or commercial organisations, and causes, including charities such as S.J. Timpany Contracting Ltd the observance of demanding Make-A-Wish. Tipene Plumbing environmental and customer service You can find out more about standards, by its network of car how CarTakeBack’s scrap car individual recycling centres. recycling network can make a Iris Donohue Their state-of-the-art financial difference to you, by contacting Gwilym van Hoffen and data system (FADS) supports them on 0800 825 346, info@ Susan Rabitte the high level of service demanded scrapcarrecycling.co.nz or visiting Ken Clarke today by the disposers of old www.scrapcarrecycling.co.nz. 6
RS & MOVERS & SHAKERS & MOVERS When cars reach the end of the road tony phillips iris donoghue Turn to Tony Phillips recently joined OCS As the retiring Chair of Keep New as part of the Wasteline Team and has been tasked with reducing Zealand Beautiful, Iris is now putting her energy into Keep Auckland CarTakeBack waste at Auckland Airport. He will Beautiful (Chair). Iris is passionate be setting up a transitional waste about assisting with establishing a facility airside, in association with AIAL and MPI. The facility will be litter free Auckland region, along the same lines as the regional Scrap car recycling treated like a quarantine facility due to the biosecurity risk associated graffiti project that she was part of for 6 years. Reducing waste to – the easy way with food coming in on international landfill, and behavioural change are flights. At present no waste is the two main focusses for this brand diverted from an international flight new project. so this new facility will see the Iris can be contacted on iris123@ start of a recycling/waste diversion vodafone.co.nz. programme. Tony can be contacted on tony. phillips@ocs.co.nz. tess drewitt janine pearson Tess recently joined Jacobs SKM Janine joins Jacobs SKM Auckland in Wellington as an environmental from London where she has consultant. After working in legal been working for seven years and government roles, Tess as an environmental planner, completed her MSc in Sweden last predominantly in the field of year, where she gained practical waste management. Janine experience in waste management, will be providing planning and biogas systems, as well as food environmental support to Jacobs' waste monitoring, measurement waste management projects in New and prevention. Tess can be contacted on tess. Zealand. Janine can be contacted on Janine. 0800 825 346 drewitt@jacobs.com. pearson@jacobs.com. info@scrapcarrecycling.co.nz may 2014 \ WWW.WASTEMINZ.ORG.NZ \ 7 www.scrapcarrecycling.co.nz
lu t io n of The Evo M IN Z Waste By Paul Evans, CEO WasteMINZ W asteMINZ is my first to ensure the longevity and efficacy Prudent financial management was opportunity to run a of WasteMINZ. At this point not absolutely necessary to ensure a membership based only did the Board put an enhanced positive future. organisation and I must admit it’s focus on the financial stewardship However, this has at times far harder than I would ever have of the organisation, but they also opened us up to criticism, with thought. In particular there is the reshaped the organisation’s vision a small number of members constant tension between making to better reflect the environment suggesting our approach was sure the organisation continues at the time. From this WasteMINZ’ too conservative and that we to be financially sustainable for vision was established as ‘to deliver were building too much equity. the long haul, and concomitantly value to our members through the Whilst I respect our members’ ensuring members continue to shaping and sharing of policy and right to such opinions, I believe perceive our services and events the development of industry good the Board has absolutely struck as value for money. Should practice’. the appropriate balance between WasteMINZ end up out of balance To give effect to this, our board finance and delivery. Indeed over in either direction things could has focussed on three key areas, the years we have seen many similar quickly turn to custard. these being: organisations in our space falter and fade away because their Boards • Increasing professionalism Where we’ve • Knowledge sharing and simply didn’t recognise the issue earlier. come from development Indeed WasteMINZ found itself in a • Support and advocacy services The way forward very challenging position just four All of WasteMINZ’ activities are now In the two years I have been with short years ago. In the year ended 30 built around these three pillars. WasteMINZ it has been a real June 2009 WasteMINZ lost $115,000 pleasure to work with a Board that and then in the year ended 30 June continually keeps the needs of the 2010 we lost another $43,000. For an Consolidating organisation and its members front organisation of our size $158,000 in our position of mind. They continually remind me losses in just two short years was real From mid-2011 through mid- at each and every Board meeting cause for concern for the Board. Had 2013 WasteMINZ was very much that WasteMINZ is here for the this pattern been allowed to continue in consolidation mode, with a benefit of its members and this unabated, in just a couple of years strong focus on prudent financial same ethos is present throughout WasteMINZ would have ceased management and strengthening the entire WasteMINZ team. to exist. To their credit the Board our balance sheet, at the same time Over the past year our improved at the time and my predecessor keeping membership and event position has allowed us to ‘gear- Marion Short recognised that attendance fees at their current up’ our service provision to a point change was needed and set about levels. I am personally very proud where we are now delivering far putting in place effective strategies to have built upon Marion’s work more than we ever have previously. to consolidate the organisation’s to deliver vastly improved financial position. The changes required were results throughout this period. not always easy, but were necessary 8
Key highlights of the past year surpluses, are reinvested The purchase of these premises include: appropriately for the benefit of has many benefits for WasteMINZ, • The development of the Land WasteMINZ members and our including better facilities and Disposal Technical Guidelines sector. infrastructure to support our (which will be completed this year) We also have other exciting members and sector groups, initiatives which we hope to be able it increases our options for the • The on-going development of to announce shortly. future and most importantly it the Health and Safety Guidelines As mentioned by Paul Bishop in greatly reduces our overall cost for the solid waste and resource his Board column, WasteMINZ has of accommodation resulting in a recovery industry (which will also recently purchased our own modest positive effect on cash flow. You’ll be completed this year) offices in Albany (just a couple of all be invited to our ‘housewarming’ • Regular meetings and liaison just as soon as we are in! blocks from our current location), with the Waste Advisory Board This positive turnaround has which we will move to early in the to ensure they are abreast of only been possible due to strong new financial year. Our prudent emerging industry issues governance; a dedicated team approach over the last few years and • Enhanced resourcing for our the resulting strong balance sheet and the enduring support of our sector groups, through the has meant that this purchase was many members and of course our employment of an additional fully funded from reserves, ensuring strategic partner the Ministry for Sector Group Co-ordinator the organisation has not incurred the Environment. So thank you to • The establishment of the any debt. you all. As always, if there’s ever WasteMINZ Strategic Investment anything you want to discuss, please Fund, whereby organisational don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Ministry for the Environment www.mfe.govt.nz Tackling the review of the waste disposal levy Every three years we ask the This identified a series of underlines the importance of question: has the waste disposal outcomes that we would see, over developing a data collection system levy been effective? Over the past time, if the levy is operating as it was that will allow us to review progress four months, a small project team at designed to. By using this framework, at any point along the way. the Ministry has been busy working the 2014 review focuses on whether On a brighter note, the levy on answering this question. the purposes of the WMA are being review is an opportunity to capture The first time we asked the achieved and, if not, why not. existing information, for example question was in 2011. At that time, the results of the Territorial Authority the waste levy had only been in The process Survey of Waste Infrastructure and existence for two years and the Our work on the levy review has Services in 2011 and 2013, and to answer was – it’s too early to say. generally followed these five phases: identify evidence gaps that can This time around, we are looking in detail at the impact the levy is having on the ground and – where Gather and Draw possible – identifying ways it could What are the key collect data What’s the data conclusions What could we questions and what telling us? do to improve our be improved. data do we need to answer them What’s happening What progress have progress? “on the ground”? we made towards By requiring the Minister for the Plan the Analyse the intended outcomes? Recommend approach data improvements Environment to regularly evaluate how the levy is going, the Waste Minimisation Act (2008) allows the Government to adapt and respond to issues and outcomes as they The challenge contribute towards better data unfold. we face collection in the future. On the The lack of available data on waste horizon is a project which aims to Our approach presents a significant challenge for create a framework for capturing in 2014 the levy review team. To measure waste data in a reliable and the impact of the levy on the consistent way across the waste A good evaluation of a project or ground, we need good data on sector in New Zealand. The National policy needs to identify what we waste disposal overall, the amount Waste Data Framework project is really want to know and how to find of waste being recycled and being led by WasteMINZ. that out. Before we can evaluate how effective the levy has been recovered in New Zealand, and the infrastructure and services that Learning from to-date, we have to define what is meant by ‘effective’. In other are available. Understanding the others words, we have to be clear what impact of a regulatory instrument, In the absence of comprehensive the intended result is (or was). To such as the waste disposal levy, waste data in New Zealand, and to establish a clear understanding is dependent on robust, almost understand what outcomes we might of this, the 2011 levy review team real-time information, says Daniel expect to see from our levy, we are developed an ‘expected outcomes’ Skinner-Du Plessis, the Ministry’s looking to international examples. framework (see Figure 1). Senior Evaluator who is assisting the levy review project team. This 10
Figure 1: Outcomes framework for the waste disposal levy There are now approximately 20 11. The environment is protected from 12. Environmental, social, economic and landfill taxes (the equivalent of our Long-term outcomes harm through waste minimisation and a cultural benefits are provided through decrease in waste disposal. waste minimisation and a decrease in waste disposal levy) operating in the waste disposal. European Union and similar waste disposal levies operating in four states in Australia. The consistent 10. Waste minimisation is achieved. trends identified in these jurisdictions offer us useful insights into the 9. People dispose of less waste and minimise more waste, particularly harmful waste. outcomes we can expect to see here in New Zealand. Mid-term outcomes 7. Waste minimisation is encouraged and promoted. Where to from here 8. The public appropriately responds to 6. Waste minimisation infrastructure price signals. Over the next weeks we’ll be and services are improved. finalising the review findings, including incorporating feedback 4. Funds are 5. Funds are from the recent levy review allocated to allocated to workshop at the April WasteMINZ projects (to Short-term outcomes territorial authorities (to promote or 3. The cost of waste disposal is Roundup. The Minister will obtain spend on matters achieve waste minimisation). increased (to recognise that disposal and consider the advice of the to promote or imposes costs on the environment, achieve waste society and the economy). Waste Advisory Board before minimisation). completing the review by 1 July 2014. 2. Revenue is raised (for promoting and achieving waste minimisation). Activity 1. A levy is imposed on waste disposed of at a disposal facility. (The levy is paid to the levy collector), Valentino Luna Hernandez Having worked on the implementation of the Solid Waste Bylaw at Auckland Council for close to two years, Valentino moved to the Ministry for the Environment’s Waste Compliance team in February. Valentino brings over seven years of experience in environmental compliance to help the Ministry deliver the WMA compliance assurance programme. The focus of this programme is to monitor Disposal Facilities, Territorial Authorities and recipients of the Waste Minimisation Fund. Valentino has an academic interest in waste as a place-maker, studying the interactions of the community, industry and government sectors around the issue of waste.
By Paul Evans, CEO WasteMINZ 12 12
LOOKING FOR A GLASS GRANT? The Forum is committed to ensuring that as much waste container glass as possible is diverted from landfill and put to an effective use. It recognises that this can only be achieved if there is input into the critical areas of infrastructure, education of the community and co-operation with local commercial recyclers and local authorities. In some locations it may be necessary to utilise recovered glass locally or upgrade infrastructure to improve glass W quality and/or the tonnages recycled. hen you’re running aspects of society to become more Councils and community groups are a multi-day festival sustainable. The Splore community invited to apply for funding to assist for close to 7,000 is an aware bunch and we were in a glass recycling projects. Refer to the people in a pristine unique position to respond through Forum’s website for the application form and the criteria for grants. and much loved regional park, it the sustainability initiatives at Splore Funding projects to date include: stands to reason that you need 2014 and beyond. Our aspirational • Infrastructure to collect quality glass to approach sustainability and in goal is for Splore to be New for remanufacture into new containers particular waste, with far more care Zealand’s first zero waste festival”, • Support infrastructure to collect and attention than your usual run says Dave. glass at community events of the mill event, and that’s exactly Splore has always been strongly • Trials of glass as a substitute for what the passionate team at Splore focussed on sustainability, but Dave sand in golf courses/sports fields have done. and the team knew that significant • Engineering report on glass in Situated in a beguiling bay on improvements could still be made. building slab construction the shores of Tapapakanga Regional One such case was the 55,000 one • The separation at source bin for single Park, the biennial three-day Splore use cups that were sent to landfill at collections with glass separate festival uses its pristine environment Splore 2012. Dave was convinced • Modification of MD4 specifications to allow glass in road construction as a ‘platform to educate and inspire they could do much better. “We attendees through the festival wanted to break the mould for Funding project guide: Making events” says Dave. a Difference in the Community kaupapa of contributing to the is available on request well-being of the planet by creating There were four key prongs to transformational experiences’. improving waste management at Simply put Splore is a boutique Splore, these included: 1 music and arts festival like no other. We talked to Dave Watson, Splore’s sustainability manager about their innovative approach to event waste management for the 2014 event, which yielded some Precycling truly impressive results. Precycling is the simple principle of When asked what sits at the thinking more carefully about the heart of Splore’s approach to waste products you buy, and the packaging management Dave says that the they come in. If you precycle, you core ethos for the festival was to avoid products with excess or over- “love and respect your Splore sized packaging, buy products space, leave no trace.” that will last, and reuse previous “We live in a time where purchases as much as possible. GET IN TOUCH WITH increasing demand for natural John Webber Photo: Emma Bass resources is putting pressure on all john@glassforum.org.nz www.glassforum.org.nz may 2014 \ WWW.WASTEMINZ.ORG.NZ \ 13
“Through all of our vendors knew where to go to get communication channels and in compostable products. We also particular our social media we asked gave them the flexibility to source our community to give real thought their own suppliers, so long as we to what they were bringing to the approved it ahead of time”. festival and then strip it back to the Splore initiated a ‘Green Trader’ bare essentials. We urged them to award in partnership with Conscious put the food they were bringing into Consumers to encourage all the reusable containers and to recycle vendors to actively participate and any packaging at home. Most to celebrate their success. 3 importantly we asked them take what they bring into Splore home with them at the end. The last thing we wanted to happen was a repeat of the horrendous waste seen at other multi-day festivals” says Dave. Globelets - a sustainable cup [Editor’s Note: You can see a video of the heart-breaking levels of waste with a twist from Rhythm and Alps 2013 here: 55,000 one use cups were sent to http://bit.ly/festivalwaste] landfill during Splore 2012, which 2 was completely at odds with the aspiration of zero waste. So in 2014 they introduced a reusable polypropylene drinking vessel called a ‘Globelet’. 100% Compostable Festival goers purchased a globelet with their first drink for $2 at Splore and it could then be used again and One of the main contributing factors again at the festival at all bars, drinks to the Splore waste stream in the stations and when purchasing a drink past was single use food waste from vendors. There were also refund contaminated non-compostable stations so people could return the packaging and serving utensils. cup and get their $2 back if they Having varying types of serving didn’t want to hold onto them. If they ware created a mixed waste stream wanted to give them a clean they that confused festival goers and could head to Ecommater’s ‘Wash was difficult to sort. To overcome against Waste’ station. The festival this all serving and packaging items also engaged Orere Point Primary as at Splore 2014 had to be certified a wash service to keep the globelets 100% compostable, but logistically in circulation. this was no easy feat. Dave says “the globelets and Dave says “To make this work the deposit system were a total win we had to get all of our food for all involved. For our bars and vendors on board. This was a real vendors it was perfect as it was a no challenge, as in many cases they cost solution, so they actually saved already thought they were doing money. the right thing by using recyclable Our sponsors Phoenix, Tiger, Photos 1 2 + 4: Jason Burgess/burgseye products. So we made it as easy as and Jagermeister instigated some possible for them by developing very cool designs for these cups, a preferred supplier arrangement making them a real piece of festival (with WasteMINZ member Kevin memorabilia and festival goers who Graham from Friendlypak) so that didn’t want to keep them could 14
get a refund when they returned all resources were recovered and their cup. There were even a cleaned before heading off site to few enterprising young kids who gathered up any discarded globelets the end user. dave's keeping the site impeccably clean Results keys to and making themselves some pocket money in the process”. This rigorous approach yielded success some truly amazing outcomes. 4 On the Saturday of the festival, the results from the 10 manned ACZWA waste stations were: Develop a vision • Compostables: 442.13kg or of success and a 70.5% Getting it sorted • Recyclables: 131.32kg or 21% strategy to get you The primary task of the waste • Landfill waste: 53.60kg or 8.5% management plan was to stop there • Total weight 627.05kg unnecessary waste to landfill, whilst • 91.5% diversion from landfill also keeping the site spotlessly clean. To do this Splore partnered with Diversion from landfill for the Be bold and take ACZWA (Auckland Community Zero entire festival was an impressive 73 percent, with much of this waste calculated risks Waste Alliance) and Clean Event Ltd to make sure that any waste items coming out of the camp sites on ended up in the right place. ACZWA the Sunday. To a large extent this Constantly had 10 manned waste stations at key was outside of the organisers’ points of the Splore site where they control, as it was what people had communicate with educated attendees on what goes brought with them. where and why. All waste stations When asked to summarise the your stakeholders, consisted of three bins: recycling, Splore experience Dave says “our compostable and landfill waste. With key success was the huge reduction take them on your a little guidance from the friendly in landfill waste when compared to ACZWA experts the festival was able past festivals. We’ve now proven journey to avoid too many mix ups. our model and set a benchmark for all future Splore events and other “By having waste stations Partner with manned, it helped to separate the events to build upon. In the process waste at source, another added we were also able to create an subject experts but unforeseen benefit was that it amazingly positive environment, a allowed us to pick up any exceptions festival culture where littering was who share your very early on. For example we frowned upon and where recycling had a vendor who had run out and composting was the norm.” vision and want to of compostable containers and started using old stock which wasn’t see you succeed compostable. The volunteers quickly picked this up, so we could put a Most importantly solution in place” says Dave. Dave adds “festival goers surround yourself seemed to really appreciate the interface with the ACZWA team, with passionate Dave Watson is an Auckland-based sustainability the feedback was overwhelmingly positive”. consultant and trainee associate of the Natural Step. He recently completed a Graduate Diploma people To be completely sure that there in Sustainable Practice at Otago Polytechnic was no unnecessary waste the with a background in energy efficiency, zero waste events and developing sustainable entire Splore waste stream was then communities. To find out more about Splore’s sorted by Clean Event at the main approach to sustainability you can contact Dave sorting station 'Trash Palace' where on mail2davewatson@gmail.com. may 2014 \ WWW.WASTEMINZ.ORG.NZ \ 15
20 years of recycling at Fisher & Paykel By Simon Wilkinson, Consultant (on behalf of Plastics New Zealand) 16 16
S ince 1993 Fisher & department dismantle appliances, Paykel Appliances has and components are separated been doing its bit as a according to their different responsible brand-owner materials. by recycling old whiteware and The world-renowned smart diverting thousands of tonnes of drives from Fisher & Paykel washing material away from New Zealand machines are removed intact landfills. Fisher & Paykel has been and sent to a company called one of New Zealand’s most iconic Eco Innovation, who use them to brands since its origins in the make a low-cost, domestic-scale, 1930’s. This iconic status brings hydro electricity generator. One corporate responsibilities, including Eco Innovation PowerSpout can a commitment to reduce the produce more than 8,000 kWh company’s environmental footprint. per year — enough to power an New Zealanders can usually average household. recycle old whiteware through their Plastic components from local council. However, many also collected appliances are separated use the Fisher & Paykel recycling into their different polymers to service through which they can enable easier recycling. In total drop off any brand of appliance around 10 tonnes a month of for free at locations in Auckland, plastic is recycled by the Fisher & Wellington and Christchurch. Paykel recycling operation. Plastics Outside of these main cities, Fisher recycled include PVC, ABS, PC, & Paykel offers free take-back of Nylon, PP, LDPE, HDPE and Noryl. appliances through their retail Some of these plastics are also partners when a new F&P appliance broken down into natural and is being purchased. coloured to further enable quality On average, around 25,000 recycling. appliances are recycled through the Fisher & Paykel’s design team Fisher & Paykel recycling programme ensure that all plastic components every year. This means that over in their appliances can be identified the past 20 years the company has by labelling them according to the diverted more than half a million international standard ISO1043. appliances, or 30,000 tonnes of This helps recyclers visually identify material, away from landfill. the different polymers to enable Despite the complexity of good material separation and the appliances and the variety maximise recycling potential. of materials used in them, the Every designer at Fisher & majority of material is recovered Paykel gains an understanding for recycling. Fisher & Paykel’s of the need to consider the recycling process recovers 95 recyclability of their products percent of material from stoves, shortly after joining the company 85 percent from dishwashers, 80 when they are given an induction percent from laundry appliances tour of the recycling operation. and 70 percent of the material in The fact that the company has a refrigerators. recycling operation at the same Items are collected at stores site where their appliances are around the country then shipped designed also makes it easy for to the nearest recycling centre product developers to work closely in Auckland, Wellington and with those that fully understand the Christchurch. In Auckland, the four implications of design decisions for staff members of the recycling end of life management. may 2014 \ WWW.WASTEMINZ.ORG.NZ \ 17
Public Place Recycling Scheme EVENTS & CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES Capital Projects Events Does your application cover the For support with funding, does following: your event cover the following Allocations will be based on whether the project allocations: meets one or more of the following criteria: Allocations will be based on whether the project • Tourist locations with high density visitor meets one or more of the following criteria: populations • Focus on family and children • Open to a large • Communities which do not currently have number of the public recycling facilities • Keeping our waterways clean and green • Keeping our waterways clean and green • Promoting recycling at sporting initiatives • High traffic areas such as transport hubs, • Involving members of the PPRS as sponsors educational institutions, shopping centres, • Delivering programme which will promote Love DHB’s, sports and entertainment venues, tourist NZ to the public through branding on recycling attractions bins, promotional materials, communications etc. • Delivering programme which will promote Love NZ to the public through branding on recycling bins, promotional materials, communications etc. For more information please email Donna at donna.glassforum@xtra.co.nz
Separated plastics are sent from F&P to plastics recycling company Key Astron Plastics in East Tamaki. Astron processes the HDPE, LDPE, Actions polypropylene, ABS, polycarbonate and polystyrene from Fisher and 25,000 appliances Paykel at their plant here in New Zealand. Some of the less common recycled each and difficult to recycle plastics are sent overseas for recycling. year Polystyrene and ABS make up about two-thirds of the F&P plastics recycled by Astron. These Smart drives are granulated then extruded then re-pelletised for sale to plastics converted into manufacturers as an alternative to low cost hydro virgin material for use in products, such as plastic chairs. electricity Other polymers are processed in a similar way by Astron, then generators may be blended with additives and colourants before being remanufactured by Astron into Plastic cablecover. Around 80 percent of the plastic Astron recycles for F&P components ends up in products here in NZ. The remaining material is sold to separated into manufacturers overseas. different polymers After the plastics and smart drives are removed from the to enable easier appliances, the remaining parts of the recycled appliances are sent recycling to Sims Pacific Metals where they are processed through their large shredder to extract metals for Remaining parts recycling. In addition to recycling their processed through products, Fisher & Paykel have recently introduced a company- shredder to wide waste minimisation extract metals for programme. Staff rubbish bins have been replaced with small recycling receptacles and large recycling stations throughout the site. Paper towels in the bathrooms are all Company- collected and taken, along with Simon Wilkinson is a consultant who specialises in food waste from the canteen, by working with business on practical environmental projects including waste minimisation, energy wide waste Transpacific for composting. Even efficiency and pollution. though it is early days for their Plastics New Zealand is the industry association minimisation office recycling system, Fisher & for plastics manufacturers in New Zealand. It works constantly to improve plastics recycling in programme Paykel are diverting 17.5 tonnes New Zealand by connecting manufacturers and per month, or 65 percent of the brand-owners with recyclers and plastics experts. waste they generate. Further information on www.plastics.org.nz. may 2014 \ WWW.WASTEMINZ.ORG.NZ \ 19
people, passion & waste Auckland Council's creation of a movement for change By Paul Evans, CEO WasteMINZ Richelle Kahui-McConnell, leader of the Para Kore ki Tamaki Project, 20 at Orakei Marae 20
A uckland Council has set a Initially many thought the goal to become the world’s proposed changes, particularly most liveable city and a key the introduction of disposer pays, part of achieving this is targeting were unfair. But the Council’s zero waste by 2040. enquiry based approach soon No doubt it’s a lofty ambition got the people thinking and the that would scare many, but the conversation changed markedly. Council’s waste team are engaging People started asking, what happens with their communities to help to our waste? Where does it go? create a movement for real and The Council then organised sustainable change. bus trips for community leaders to the Waitakere refuse transfer Link to WMMP station. These trips helped people This movement for change is one of get to grips with the magnitude of Working with you for a greener tomorrow seven distinct projects established Auckland’s waste challenge (each under the Council’s Waste week Auckland produces enough n Management and Minimisation Plan waste to cover a rugby field as high EnviroWaste Services Limited (WMMP). Through the development as the goalposts) and also inspired provides complete solutions for the of the WMMP, elected members and motivated them when they saw environmentally safe management expressed that it was vitally the huge potential for reuse and the and disposal of waste important that the council prepare related community benefits. its communities for the coming changes in services and in particular Social Enterprise Specific areas for the transition to disposer pays. in Otara of expertise include: Furthermore the project also One of the communities the Council seeks to facilitate opportunities has been working very closely with • Recycling/Recovery for community-driven reduce, and who have wholeheartedly Solutions reuse, recycle and renew initiatives embraced the zero waste vision is by working in ways that achieve Otara. Otara is a diverse community • Waste Collection positive social, cultural, economic situated 18 kilometres to the and environmental outcomes. The • Bulk Waste southeast of the Auckland CBD near project is focussed on particular Transfer Operations the head of the Tamaki River. Otara communities, where it was identified has a strong historical connection • Waste Disposal at Landfills the impact of the changes would be to waste, due to its proximity to the and Transfer Stations felt the most. now closed Greenmount landfill. Otara has around 160 • Landfill Design Community neighbourhood support groups; Engagement • Leachate Control with these groups taking a much and Monitoring A fundamental part of the Council’s broader role than safety alone, they approach was early engagement are about community development, • Landfill Post-Closure with the community, finding out knowing your neighbours, creating Aftercare what they thought the issues, connections and developing neighbourhood-led solutions. • Hazardous Waste challenges and opportunities The Council has partnered Treatment and Disposal might be and just as importantly finding out what was already with Otara Health, a charitable • Contaminated Site happening out there. This was done organisation which supports the Remediation through targeting a wide range groups, to help these groups to of organisations; from community learn fundamental skills in relation to • Stormwater Monitoring groups to churches and passionate growing their own food, minimising food waste, composting and • Landfill Gas Extraction, community leaders, the Council recycling. Processing and Monitoring went wherever there was energy and interest. continued on page 23 0800 240 120 may 2014 \ WWW.WASTEMINZ.ORG.NZ \ 21 www.envirowaste.co.nz
A FREE nationwide service to ‘FREE’ PCB collect and safely dispose of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) DISPOSAL! is offered by Transpacific Technical Call 0800 PCB WASTE Services (NZ) Ltd (TTS) Conditions of this promotion are: • PCBs must be removed from lighting systems or fittings and rendered safe, prior to TTS accepting possession. • This promotion is limited to the collection and disposal of 12 tonnes (maximum packaged weight) of PCB waste. There are significant quantities of PCBs • This PCB elimination and disposal promotion expires March 2015. still remaining in New Zealand, despite • All applicants under this promotion must register with legislation being in place since 2004 TTS. To register phone Carolyn Armstrong on 0800 PCB WASTE. prohibiting their use or storage. • Acceptance approvals will be issued by TTS prior to pick-up. • Any applicant currently on EPA’s PCB register must This promotion is focused mainly on disclose this status. the disposal of small PCB containing • Free collection and disposal will be applied on a first come first served basis. capacitors, typically found in older style • TTS will assist applicants with information on identifying fluorescent lighting ballasts. PCBs and on any requirements concerning PCB storage, handling, registration, transport and disposal. • TTS retains sole discretion as to whether or not to accept TTS is offering this service for FREE, PCB waste and is not obligated to accept waste it considers enabling you to off-set the cost of outside the promotion’s objectives. TTS is able to provide more information to help identify suspect having your lights checked and capacitors and ballasts in PCBs. Further information on PCBs is upgraded. Further savings can be made available on the websites below; 1. Safe Management of PCBs Code of Practice publication is with modern energy efficient lighting. on the MOH website: http://www.moh.govt.nz 2. Phasing out Small PCB Holdings is on ERMA website: Transformers and other items of http://www.ermanz.govt.nz electrical equipment containing PCBs This promotion is made possible by a grant from the Government’s are also eligible. Waste Minimisation Fund, managed by the Ministry for the Environment. TTS also acknowledges Tredi NZ Ltd as its PCB offshore disposal agent and promotion partner.
Furthermore the council has council view worked with church and community leaders to create waste champions This project has been led by Jenny who act as local advocates. One Chilcott, Auckland Council’s project such champion is the Reverend manager Special Community Ifaleme Teisi from the Free Church Engagement Project. Whilst of Tonga, who has a vision for his Jenny freely admits it has been a church to be sustainable. He is now challenging process and that the a fully trained composting tutor work to date is really just the tip teaching his parishioners how to of the iceberg, she firmly believes bokashi and advising them how to they are setting the foundations separate recyclables. for change led by the community Social Enterprise and the itself. “Yes these groups need the concept of “waste to employment” council’s support, but they can do is another theme which has come a far better job than we ever could through loud and clear. Examples on our own, local people bring include Habitat for Humanity’s reuse passion, relationships and credibility. shop ReStore, which takes in old Through this project we have been and unwanted goods donated by strengthening relationships between the community and sells them on the Council and the community, at affordable prices. Not only does we have been fostering greater this prevent the goods from going collaboration and it is also positively to landfill, but it also enables more changing the perception of council Habitat for Humanity homes to be so we are now seen as more of a built within the local community. partner with the community”. As Habitat for Humanity’s Conrad When asked what has worked Lapoint says “every sale to us bangs well Jenny says “I think importantly a nail, which helps us build more we have been meeting people on homes year on year”. their own ground, engaging them in Yet another organisation meaningful conversations and taking working closely with the council to an action focussed approach. We’ve embrace the related employment worked in a holistic way and have opportunities is Crosspower provided learning opportunities Ministries, whose goal is to reach so that we increase capacity and youth at risk, engage them and strengthen community leadership. influence them for better outcomes. This means that the change will Sei Brown, general manager of hopefully continue long after the Crosspower says “this whole project is over. Most importantly recycling journey is more than it has been about Council taking just taking trash and putting it in a step back, just being the the right place, it is actually a real support partner and keeping the community building exercise. Not communities well and truly in the At 'Skill Share' waste champions from across the region come together to share knowledge only does it build young people, but driver’s seat”. and skills. it brings the community to a point where conversations happen. The Next steps Waste Champion Rev Ifalame Teisi from the Free Church of Tonga in Favona, Mangere. passion of people to do something, The Council is currently developing especially with waste will change an evaluation framework to identify the community, it’ll give kids the impact of the project and we will jobs, and it’ll help young people endeavour to keep you updated as understand the relationship between the project progresses. themselves, our community and For more on what’s happening in nature.” Otara be sure to check out this short film http://bit.ly/otarawaste. may 2014 \ WWW.WASTEMINZ.ORG.NZ \ 23
Restaurant food waste: identifying the sources & causes By Tess Drewitt, Environmental Consultant T he UNFAO and Waste Scale of the a massive share of the global Resources Institute has restaurant market and generally problem estimated that, each year, have a large number of franchises we lose or waste around 30 – 50 Increasingly, restaurants are seen and outlets that, working together, percent of food intended for human as part of the food waste problem. could substantially reduce global consumption somewhere along In the European Union (EU), for food waste. However, food waste the food supply chain. This waste example, the food service industry prevention measures in global results in substantial resource contributes towards an estimated restaurant chains are, by no inefficiencies, financial loss and 14 percent of post-agricultural means, a one size fits all solution. social hardship. While food waste production food waste — 9 Even restaurants operating within management goes a long way percent more than wholesale and the same framework must have towards reducing the environmental supermarkets. In China alone, prevention measures tailored impacts of food waste disposal, it restaurants throw away enough depending on the circumstances only addresses part of the problem. food each year to feed an estimated of each specific restaurant to be Reducing the life-cycle impacts 200 million people. Any efforts effective and efficient. Global food of food waste instead requires a made by restaurants to prevent waste prevention programmes are preventative approach, and a much food waste — by both changing thus difficult to implement. more thorough understanding of their practices and influencing I discovered this first-hand the sources and causes of food those of their customers — would when conducting research on the waste than traditional food waste go a long way towards reducing sources and causes of food waste management. food waste globally. Restaurants, in one of the world’s largest fast like households, have the added casual restaurant chains (a type of incentive of saving money through restaurant that operates in a similar improved efficiencies. way to fast food restaurants like Global restaurant chains are McDonalds, but has a higher quality particularly interesting. They hold of food and service). I wanted to 24
understand what makes some customers, with the remaining food purchase costs, disposal costs, and restaurants produce high levels waste being produced either in the money spent on energy, water and of food waste, while others only kitchen or serving line. staff for processing and cooking produce a little, and how food waste I was told, and discovered for wasted food) showed that the could affect restaurants financially. myself, that the Chinese customers European restaurants were performing I also wanted to examine whether were leaving so much food behind better financially by producing less food waste prevention programmes because of the Chinese eating food waste. The Swedish restaurant could be global within the same culture. Traditionally, Chinese people was spending an estimated 3 percent restaurant chain, or whether they tend to order more food than they of daily turnover on avoidable food should vary according to cultural need as a sign of affluence, and waste, while the Chinese restaurants settings to be effective. prefer variety over ordering just one were spending up to 15 percent. Even meal. When faced with a Western- though the Swedish restaurant was cultural style menu, the Chinese consumers already producing much less food differences continued to order a variety of main waste, these findings highlighted menu items, and subsequently the potential for future savings from To answer these questions, left large amounts of food behind. continued food waste prevention I visited four of the chain’s most The restaurants encouraged this programmes. prominent (and culturally different) behaviour by serving portions that restaurants — two in China, one in were much larger than those served NEXT STEPS Sweden and another in Holland. At in their European counterparts. This research provides a good case each restaurant, I examined food Larger sizes were generally study example on the importance waste streams to understand the maximised with rice or potatoes. of understanding the source, cause, sources and causes of food waste. I looked at where waste was being quantity and composition of food RE-USING FOOD waste so as to develop effective and produced (in the kitchen, storage, serving line, or by customers), and There was also an interesting efficient waste prevention strategies. why (for example poor storage difference between the Swedish It also provides an indication of conditions, inaccurate forecasting or and Dutch restaurants. The Swedish the potential for full cost savings too large portions). restaurant produced 70 percent of as a result of prevention strategies. The first thing I noticed was its food waste in the serving line Making small changes to portion how much food waste the Chinese (i.e. food that was prepared, but sizes or main menu offerings could restaurants were producing: an wasn’t served), compared to 40 go a long way towards reducing estimated 2½ – 5 times more percent in the Dutch restaurant. I food waste in one restaurant, per customer than the European found this was probably due to the whereas addressing forecasting and restaurants. One Chinese restaurant different approaches between the legally reusing food in the kitchen was producing an estimated 1,500kg two restaurants to reusing serving would be more suitable for another. of food waste per day! The main food. The Swedish restaurant was You can find a full copy difference between the restaurants routinely throwing all serving food of my research, including the was the amount of food waste the waste away, whereas the Dutch methodologies, here: http://www. Chinese customers left behind restaurant was identifying ways of lunduniversity.lu.se/o.o.i.s?id=24923 on their plates. In the Chinese reusing the serving food in other &postid=4080877. restaurants, customers were leaving meals. Both restaurants advised behind (and thus wasting) up to 30 they were operating under strict percent of the food they ordered, food health and safety guidelines, and 90 percent of all food waste so I could only assume the Swedish produced in the restaurant came restaurant found it more convenient from the customers, as opposed to to throw food away (under the guise food waste produced in the kitchen. of food health and safety) than to In Sweden and Holland, however, identify ways to reuse. customers were only leaving behind an estimated 3–8 percent of their FINANCIAL SAVINGS Tess Drewitt conducted this research as part meals, and only 30–60 percent of My calculation of the estimated of her Master’s degree in Environmental all food waste was produced by full costs of food waste (including Management and Policy. Tess is now employed by Jacobs SKM as an environmental consultant. may 2014 \ WWW.WASTEMINZ.ORG.NZ \ 25
You can also read