Wireless in 2020: looking ahead at what promises to be an eventful New Year - Real Wireless
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Wireless in 2020: looking ahead at what promises to be an eventful New Year Real Wireless Limited t +44 207 117 8514 PO Box 2218 f +44 808 280 0142 Pulborough e info@realwireless.biz West Sussex w real-wireless.com RH20 4XB UK @real_wireless
Wireless in 2020: looking ahead at what promises to be an eventful year Every year, we see new achievements for the we have helped regulators to develop a wireless industry, as well as new challenges, variety of consensus-building approaches. and 2019 was no exception. So what should Austria is a case in point. Here we worked the industry be celebrating now that 2019 in an advisory capacity with Austria’s has drawn to a close? And what might the Regulatory Authority for Broadcasting and industry be excited about in 2020? Here’s Telecommunications (RTR) on the nations the Real Wireless view – drawn from the cellular infrastructure taking into account all insights of our in-house experts – on why an national operators and establishing viable eventful year is expected. new spectrum and densifications options. We assessed the number of sites required (and Rural reach the cost incurred) for each MNO to meet coverage obligations within the context Rural and remote coverage has long of RTR’s stated desire to received a lot of lip service, but it does now establish an investment- appear that a number of governments and friendly framework. industry players are backing their words In the event, RTR with investment. Only a few months ago has delivered the four biggest UK mobile networks – EE, that framework A shared rural network O2, Three and Vodafone – alongside the UK combined with a has been proposed as government, agreed to invest up to £1 billion cleverly devised into tackling ‘not-spots’ – rural areas with coverage part of a push to bring 4G little or no signal. A shared rural network has obligation coverage to 95 per cent been proposed as part of a push to bring mechanism 4G coverage to 95 per cent of the UK by that encourages of the UK by 2025 2025. If the mobile networks deliver on these operators to commitments (which will cost them around ensure coverage £500 million) the UK government has agreed to remote and to match that investment and Ofcom will rural areas. remove the planned coverage obligations from the forthcoming 700MHz and 3.6GHz Many governments still think of spectrum spectrum auctions. auctions as a revenue-generating exercise rather than a way of producing a desirable An important point of this Shared Rural outcome for all stakeholders. It will be Network (SRN) concept is the emphasis interesting therefore to see whether the on 4G, with which we totally agree. Rural Austrian experience really can benefit coverage is mostly an economic challenge. everyone: operators, end users and The promise of 5G is something of a red the government. herring when a standardised and maturing technology like 4G can offer so much for rural Ireland, unsurprisingly, has a number of end users. It’s a pragmatic way forward that, issues in delivering rural coverage including importantly, does not exclude the evolution a high road density and a relatively small to 5G over time. population, some of which is spread widely over a predominantly rural country. The UK proposal is not the only one to tackle Itwas in this context that we were asked rural coverage of course. We have experience by the Irish regulator (Comreg) to help of working with countries where different with a study addressing future mobile approaches have been tried and where connectivity in the country. Real Wireless Smart investment decisions for smart ports 2
Our key finding was that mobile broadband Transport will continue to play a key role in extending mobile capacity and coverage in Ireland. On transport too, you might have thought We also found that, beyond a certain level more advances would have been made of coverage, the cost of providing 30Mbit/s since our May 2016 blog concluded that to the population rises exponentially. Higher there was a lot of work needed to provide data speeds have a very material effect acceptable connectivity on trains. However, on costs. rail continues to be a challenge, not least because there are still unresolved safety The approach we used to and economics debates related to putting support the Austrian equipment close to rail tracks. and Irish regulators had its genesis That said, Nokia’s recent win of a Deutsche Enhanced mobile in approaches Bahn tender to deliver and test the world’s broadband (eMBB) will developed for first 5G-based network for automated rail the UK 4G operation is an encouraging development, continue to play a key auctions, and as are discussions of possible synergies with role in extending mobile used for Ofcom the UK’s Strategic Road Network to ensure support, in 2012. a level of coverage to the country’s trains. capacity and coverage We continued to However, there is still room for uncertainty innovate around over whether a convincing business case can our software tools be made for supplying mobile capacity to over the intervening passengers in particular. years and now have a market leading capability to By contrast there seems to be strong establish site deployment/upgrade costs support for a role for wireless in the balanced against coverage and service development of connected vehicles. The level benefits to targeted areas (properties, evolution of 4G/5G vehicle to everything road and rail) in rural and semi-rural (v2x) standards is continuing and our own communities where mobile coverage is work on the AutoAir project – drawing to a desperately needed. close in 2020 – aims to help mature and prove the technology that will make fully As for the role of sharing in providing rural connected and autonomous vehicles (CAV) coverage, our experience so far is that a commercial reality. finding consensus among operators on the sites to share (or not) and the conditions in The AutoAir consortium has demonstrated, which this might be relevant will take some through the use of both 60/70 GHz time to work through. The choice of site(s) mmWave and sub 6 GHz networks, the to share (whether mobile operator sites ability to connect vehicles moving at high or 3rd party sites) or to deploy new sites speed and stream data – both between needs to take into account factors such as them and to fixed infrastructure. Spin-out clearly defined coverage and service area projects are already commencing at the targets that are likely to bring maximum UK-based Millbrook Proving Ground; the benefits to the consumers - £500 million leading vehicle testing facility for the design, of taxpayers money is promised to be engineering and development of automotive invested in improving rural mobile coverage and test technology propulsion systems. The and this needs to be spent wisely to yield connected vehicle market is continuing to the maximum benefits. In any case, rural develop with recent positive signs including networks in the UK – and the role of sharing – electric car specialist, Tesla, announcing will, we are certain, remain important issues pricing for connected services in the US. in the coming year as the foundations for the shared rural network are formed. Real Wireless Smart investment decisions for smart ports 3
A couple of questions remain that need to cost of providing these reliable services via be addressed. Firstly, for the industry to scale network slicing from the existing wide-area and realise the $173 billion market value public mobile network. We looked at how predicted for 2040, there will be a need for the operational benefits of port services a vast amount of integrated circuits (ICs) can translate to potential revenues and on a lot of semiconductor chips. Achieving examined ways in which this in a cost effective manner is a very reliable wireless services real challenge. can be a key enabler for smart port The second question relates to the indecision and smart city There needs to be regarding the competing V2X technologies services such a clear strategy to of 5G and ITS-G5, an evolution of the wireless as intelligent expand the number 802.11p standard that operates in the 5.9GHz transport frequency band. Both have been proposed systems. of organizations which as potential options for connecting vehicles We also can deploy small cells if to other vehicles and road infrastructure showed how in the UK. With different strengths and the flexibility densification is to be a weaknesses, can these technologies of virtualised viable option compete and live together, or are we looking 5G network another BetaMax / VHS video recorder architectures means showdown as we saw in the 1980s? that network resources can be used more efficiently Private networks – and over-dimensioning in the network can be reduced. More optimistically, a future in which private 5G and LTE networks may offer new Private networks for airports will be a focus revenue sources for operators and business for Real Wireless and other players in the models for industries is already being coming year; we’ve noticed a significant demonstrated. For example, uptick in interest in our services in this sector as part of the two-year and we expect this interest to continue to EU Horizon 2020 5G grow in 2020. MoNArch project, Real Wireless developed These aren’t the only encouraging signs techno-economic for the private network model; we have assessment analysed the merits of building private methods networks in various contexts and the outlook validated by is positive. The readiness of Germany and the HEAT MAP experts in the UK in particular to carve out some spectrum ports sector for lightly licensed use for non-incumbents IMAGE to quantify is significant. the costs and benefits of 5G Of course, there will be challenges. Resolving deployments. issues around roaming in and out of these These were then private network domains in a seamless way applied to the for users will be essential. We also don’t real-world setting of underestimate the difficulty of designing, Hamburg Port. building, maintaining and operating a professional-grade network, even at a A Real Wireless-led report modest scale. on the project discussed the extra Real Wireless Smart investment decisions for smart ports 4
In this regard MNO skills and the help of the US of the CBRS band, which remains a system integrators will be key to making this popular topic on the conference circuit. This area feasible and workable. Nevertheless, we has clearly influenced Ofcom in its see this as a key area for advances in 2020. introduction of Local Access licences (which enable Densification organisations to access spectrum in By contrast, the outlook for densification which incumbents may be less clear. We have discussed this already exist) and at length in recent years, regularly focusing Shared Access, on the support we can offer regulators. which has Our part in the UK5G Connected Places similarities with group, along with the work of the so-called the licensed ‘barrier busters’ of the UK’s Department for access tier IMAGE Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) are of CBRS. modest but encouraging examples of how regulators can address this issue. Ofcom also says it is investigating By contrast, private operators or neutral a move to hosts sharing hardware and (possibly) deliver dynamic spectrum (see Shared Access below) spectrum access in could enable cost-effective multi- the future. That would operator support. This in turn could offer be a welcome change as opportunities for customization or added it could bring the flexibility and value services, although this will depend affordability of a fully dynamic shared on the network user(s). access system into play. In any case there looks to be consensus in Europe that ways Essentially then, there needs to support sharing are desirable. In July, to be a clear strategy to for example, Ofcom announced new rules expand the number allowing spectrum sharing in four bands, with There needs to be of organizations the aim of making it easier for businesses which can deploy or localised service providers to build and a clear strategy to small cells if operate various types of wireless networks. expand the number densification is to be a viable These are welcome moves to open up of organizations which option – but spectrum for enterprise and alternative can deploy small cells if there’s still service providers, to ensure that every some work industry – not just telecoms – can benefit densification is to be a to do before from innovative wireless technologies, viable option this happens. including 4G and 5G. However, there However, if progress are many compromises in the proposed can be made, 2020 framework, especially when compared with could be a pivotal year presumed role models such as the USA’s 3.5 for densification. GHz CBRS or Germany’s award of 100 MHz in the 3.7 GHz band for industrial use. Shared access Our experience of white space – using Shared access is still a work in progress too. gaps in the radio spectrum in TV frequency Shared access – and enablers for shared bands, which can be used to offer wireless access – often involves a focus on the use in applications has shown that the device Real Wireless Smart investment decisions for smart ports 5
ecosystem factor must be managed. However, Open RAN got a major boost Mainstream chipsets are now support in November with Vodafone announcing different sharing approaches which a Europe-wide tender not long after will change the economics of shared announcing its first trials of the technology spectrum approaches. in the region but there are still some uncertainties. For example: what does Nevertheless, whatever governments may Vodafone’s initiative mean at a group level say, the MNO community is still lukewarm as opposed to a local operating company about shared access. It’s hardly surprising level? And can fragmentation of the as these are economically uncertain times implementation of networks be avoided? for MNOs; if sharing is observed to create economic value in connectivity but is outside The year ahead of the control of the MNOs, expect to see shareholders questioning the wisdom of So what is the paying large sums for a spectrum ‘asset’ that outlook for Lab iurepel lignat. is perhaps starting to see its value eroded. the wireless industry in Pitae nusciumquia But shared access won’t go away. The large 2020? Capital accabo. Ut mi, quantity of spectrum in mmWave designated budgets for IMT purposes from the recent World are going tempelit ilita vellamet Radiocommunication Conference 2019 to continue et alignis sant, quae (WRC-19) will surely be part of the sharing to take a narrative over 2020. pounding as imodis deles anduntio the pressure exerfernam, sitae Prospects for the open RAN to deploy 5G continues; however, Also high on the list of discussion topics there are still critical in the coming year will be the open RAN questions around the (O-RAN) roadmap. O-RAN architecture is sustainability of revenues. Wireless must the foundation for building the virtualized continue to evolve and find its footholds into RAN on open hardware, with embedded industries and use cases barely considered AI-powered radio control, that has been a decade ago, its potential remains vast envisioned by operators and supported and the possibilities exciting. But many by standards organizations. Will it work? questions remain and this year won’t Or will it go the way of Open Base Station answer all of them. Architecture Initiative (OBSAI) in the early 2000s? However, one thing is certain: during 2020 Real Wireless will be supporting OBSAI was a largely unsuccessful attempt to vendors, regulators, operators and industry standardise internal base station interfaces. associations in trying to bring clarity to a Today, we feel the landscape is different; fast-changing wireless landscape. nearly twenty years on, a combination of software-oriented architecture, cost pressures, and lack of suppliers for MNOs may have created a tipping point. Thus, O-RAN may well enjoy more success than OBSAI, though stringent requirements on latency and reliability of the RAN will continue to challenge the practicality of solutions. Real Wireless Smart investment decisions for smart ports 6
About Real Wireless Real Wireless is the world’s leading independent wireless advisory firm. Its network of experts includes engineers, physicists, economists, security advisors, business strategists and deployment specialists. Real Wireless clients benefit from a comprehensive portfolio of specialist and custom tools that analyse radio network performance, techno-economic impact and the business model implications of wireless systems. With this unmatched resource Real Wireless is able to advise the industry and all user groups, spanning businesses to governments, mobile operators, regulators and technology companies on every aspect of wireless technology. Real Wireless has applied this unique range of technical and strategic expertise to some of the UK’s biggest wireless infrastructure projects – from major stadium connectivity to shopping malls to transport systems – and has worked with operators, vendors and regulators on all forms of wireless connectivity. It has also advised governments and the European Union on the technical, social and economic implications of communications policy. Real Wireless experts help clients to understand, select and deploy technology according to need; we deliver truly independent advice as we are not affiliated with any association, company or proprietary standard. That is why, with 5G on the horizon, Real Wireless is best placed to guide and advise businesses on the choices and opportunities next generation communications systems will bring. Venues & Transport Government Commercial Urban Rural Campuses Property Development Development Real Wireless Limited t +44 207 117 8514 PO Box 2218 f +44 808 280 0142 Pulborough e info@realwireless.biz West Sussex w real-wireless.com RH20 4XB UK @real_wireless
You can also read