Whakawātea te Huarahi - A model drug law to 2020 and beyond - NZ Drug Foundation
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Whakawātea te Huarahi A model drug law to 2020 and beyond
It’s time to
take action
Our model drug law is based on evidence and research Ahakoa he iti, he pounamu,
from New Zealand and around the world about the best ara, ko Aotearoa. He kaha
way to reduce the harms caused by both drugs and our tonu tātou ki te tū mo
current drug laws. ngā mea tika. I ngā hītore
We think New Zealand is ready to have this discussion. o Aotearoa, kāore tātou
It’s time to move the conversation past the question e matakū, ko tātou he
‘Should we reform?’ to ‘How should we reform? manawanui ki a aratakina
We know that 64% of us now think the law on cannabis te ao mo ngā kaupapa
prohibition should be changed, for example. And calls whakahirahira ki a tātou.
are getting louder by the day for a new approach to
methamphetamine in our communities. New Zealand is a small,
New Zealand has some excellent and world-leading agile country with a strong
harm-reduction approaches in place already, such as sense of justice. We have
our needle exchange programme and Police diversion a history of not being afraid
schemes. We want to build on that. We can also build to lead the world on issues
on our National Drug Policy 2015–2020, which rightly that we hold dear.
sees drug use as a health issue.
64%
So let’s start making the changes we all want to see.
Let’s aim for better health, less crime and better
outcomes for rangatahi.
Whakawātea te Huarahi
Clearing the pathway forward OF US NOW THINK THE LAW
ON CANNABIS PROHIBITION
‘Whakawātea’ means to clear, free up, cleanse or purify spiritually, SHOULD BE CHANGED
while ‘huarahi’ is a pathway, road or track. For us, the title
“Whakawātea te Huarahi” signifies a fresh start for the debate on
drug policy and a sense of movement towards a better future.We all want a happier, healthier, more equal New Zealand. For us that means treating drug use as a health issue rather than a criminal issue. WE PROPOSE: • Removing criminal penalties for the possession, use and social supply of all drugs • Developing a strictly regulated cannabis market • Putting more resources into prevention, education and treatment This model drug law is intended to be a conversation starter. We’d love to know what you think. www.drugfoundation.org.nz 01
We can make some
simple changes that will
make all the difference
3,140
The Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 came into force more than 40 years
ago. It sets out harsh criminal penalties for possession and use of
drugs in an attempt to stop people taking them.
This is an approach that has proved both ineffective and harmful.
Research and experience around the world shows that criminal
penalties have surprisingly little impact on whether people In 2015, 3,140 people
take drugs.
were convicted for
Our high drug use in New Zealand is proof of that. Even though possession and/or
we convict thousands of people each year for using drugs, we have use of an illicit drug
some of the highest use rates in the world. or drug utensil.
Our laws prevent people accessing help when they need it, and
they leave thousands every year with a conviction that impacts ‘Drug harm’ includes harms to
on employment, relationships and travel. physical and mental health and
negative effects on employment
It’s a simple fix. We need to repeal the Misuse of Drugs Act and and relationships. It can also
replace it with a new Act that treats drug use as a health issue, include harm caused by our drug
not a criminal issue. laws. For example, spending time
in prison can have a huge impact
on a person and their family –
especially their children.
02 A model drug law to 2020 and beyond www.drugfoundation.org.nzFive goals we should
all be aiming for
5 G 1 Minimise the harm
caused by drug use
• Young
•
•
people have special protection from harm.
If people decide to use drugs, they start later and use less.
Anyone can access treatment when they want it.
O2
• The law makes it easy to take action that reduces the harms caused by drug use.
Respect human rights • Penalties for drug-related behaviour are proportional to the harm caused
to others.
• People who use drugs have access to an equal quality of care in the
A 43
health system.
Safer communities with • Drug-related crime is reduced by investing in prevention, education and treatment.
less drug-related crime • The black market is reduced, and no one profits by causing harm.
L5
Equity for Māori • Māori are integral to developing and implementing drug law.
• Māori are not disproportionately impacted by laws.
• If a regulated cannabis market is developed, the economic benefits are felt
by Māori communities.
S
Policy is cost-effective • Money is spent on what works to reduce harm – such as treatment rather
and evidence-based than enforcement.
• Regulations are as simple as possible and provide value for money.
$1.8B
Unfortunately, our current system is not achieving these
five key goals. Illicit drug costs New Zealand $1.8 billion
per year in health, social and economic harms.
Meanwhile, families and communities struggle to know
who to turn to for support with drug issues. We have long
waiting lists for treatment, and stigma around drug use
stops people seeking treatment.
Unacceptably, around 40% of people in prison for drugs
Drug use costs New Zealand are Mäori. Mäori are also twice as likely to experience
$1.8 billion per year in health,
substance use disorder in their lifetime. Promoting Mäori
social and economic harms.
equity needs to be a key goal of any new drug law.
www.drugfoundation.org.nz A model drug law to 2020 and beyond 03It’s time to decriminalise
possession, use and
social supply of drugs
WE PROPOSE:
• Treating drug use as a health issue rather than a criminal issue
• Providing more funding for prevention, education and treatment
Under our proposal, commercial supply and trafficking of drugs
would still be punished, but people who are caught with drugs
for their own use would not face criminal penalties.
CASE STUDY
Why? Because the vast majority of people who use drugs do so
Portugal
without causing harm to themselves or others. Prosecuting them
can have a far-reaching negative impact on their lives but has limited
or no effect on their drug use.
Portugal decriminalised the use of
The minority who do struggle with their drug use need support, all drugs in 2001 and invested heavily
compassion and access to treatment. Fear of criminal punishment in prevention, treatment and harm
does not stop people using drugs. In fact, it can make them use reduction. Drug use is still prohibited
more heavily. Offering treatment instead is not only more humane, but does not carry criminal penalties
in most cases
it actually works.
Counter-intuitive? Evidence indicates
this approach is working, with
decreases in drug use, fewer
offenders in prison, fewer court cases
and a reduction in HIV infections and
overdoses. Importantly, drug use by
How about trafficking and young people aged 15–19 has fallen,
commercial dealing? not skyrocketed as many expected.
Thanks in part to Portugal’s positive
These would remain illegal, but we
experiences, at least 15 countries
think the penalties should be
have now decriminalised personal
reviewed to make sure they are
possession of all drugs.
proportionate and consistent.
For example, the maximum penalty
for dealing Class A drugs is life
imprisonment. This puts it on a par
with murder.
04 A model drug law to 2020 and beyond www.drugfoundation.org.nzHow would our
proposal look in
practice?
WE WANT TO: CASE STUDIES
• Ensure those with drug use issues are offered treatment
as early as possible
• Reduce the number of people needlessly introduced into
Joel 34y
Is having trouble with his meth use
the criminal justice system and feels like his life is spiralling out
of control. He’s caught by Police with
a small amount on his person. He’s
If police find a person in possession of drugs, they would issue
given a caution, and because meth
a ‘mandatory caution’. They would also give out some health is a Class A drug, he’s sent to a brief
information and legal advice. intervention session the next day with
a local health NGO. They recommend
After one, two or three cautions (depending on the drug), the person he seeks treatment and suggest a
would be required to attend a brief intervention session run by a range of options. He decides to see
community alcohol and drug treatment service. The session would a counsellor to help him address
some of the underlying issues leading
result in a recommendation as to whether further health assessment
to his dependency on meth. He also
and treatment is needed. If so, a range of non-compulsory treatment joins a support group and is able to
options would be available. dramatically reduce his meth use.
To ensure the focus remains on improving health outcomes, any legal
Sam 22y
penalty for not attending the brief intervention session would be
restricted to an option to reschedule or a low fine.
Uses drugs occasionally on
weekends. She’s caught by Police
buying a tab of ecstasy, which has
been reclassified as a Class C drug.
It is not generally What about drug utensils They give her a mandatory caution
appropriate for the State (such as pipes and bongs)? and some information on staying safe
to intervene coercively to and how to access help if she needs
We don’t think possession of a drug it. Having read the information, she
prevent individual citizens utensil should be a crime. There’s no decides that her drug use is not
from harming themselves. evidence that the offence deters drug currently problematic, but from then
LAW COMMISSION REPORT 2011 use, and keeping utensils illegal doesn’t on, she is more aware of the risks
“CONTROLLING AND REGULATING DRUGS” help us meet any of our health goals. and takes better health precautions.
(PAGE 48, PARA 1.44) Some utensils, such as sterile needles Sam continues her life with no further
and vaporisers, can actually save lives. interaction with the Police.
We’d like to see the supply of drug
utensils carefully regulated though,
with health a key focus.
www.drugfoundation.org.nz A model drug law to 2020 and beyond 05What about
cannabis?
44
WE PROPOSE:
• Developing a regulated cannabis market that protects young
people and keeps health considerations central
A poll commissioned last year showed 64% of New Zealanders now
support decriminalisation or legalisation of cannabis. COUNTRIES NOW HAVE SOME
TYPE OF DECRIMINALISATION
Because cannabis use can be harmful, especially for those who start OR LEGALISATION OF CANNABIS.
415K
using cannabis earlier in life, we need a system that will:
• minimise the number of people who use cannabis
• make it harder than it is now for those under 18 to access cannabis
• educate people about the risks
• make it easier for anyone struggling with their use to access support.
PEOPLE EACH YEAR IGNORE OUR LAWS
PROHIBITING CANNABIS USE. THIS
BRINGS THE LAW INTO DISREPUTE –
IT’S TIME FOR A CHANGE.
How dangerous is cannabis?
We know that the majority of people use cannabis without serious harm.
However, a small proportion experience negative impacts such as anxiety,
depression, memory loss and mood swings. Those who use cannabis long term
may face health risks such as respiratory disease (if smoked) and mental illnesses Our focus is on
such as schizophrenia, at least for those who may be predisposed. protecting kids and
Cannabis impairs driving, especially when combined with alcohol. It also carries protecting our streets.
the risk of dependency in around one in 10 users. Heavy use by young people JUSTIN TRUDEAU, PRIME MINISTER OF CANADA,
has been linked to poorer outcomes in education and employment as well as a AS CANADA PREPARES TO LEGALISE CANNABIS
reduction in IQ points, though the research on this is mixed.
Our verdict? Cannabis can be harmful, so our law should focus on minimising harm,
especially to young people. The best way to minimise harm is to tightly regulate use.
06 A model drug law to 2020 and beyond www.drugfoundation.org.nzRegulating cannabis
is the responsible
thing to do
Public conversations about cannabis often compare our current tough He tino waiwai rawa nei ki ngā
drug law with a completely free market. In fact, there are a range of māori ki te hurihanga ngā ture
tarutaru, tā rātou i pākinikini ai
responsible options in between these two extremes shown in the
mai i te kahungahanga tarukino
diagram below. me ngā raruraru whaimana hoki,
In a profit-driven market (at each end of the graph), sellers target e rua pū ake te raruraru mō te
māori ki ngā tauiwi ma.
people who use most frequently and heavily, increasing social and
health harms. Instead, we should be aiming our law at the ‘sweet spot’ Changing cannabis law is
in the centre of the spectrum. especially crucial for Māori,
who not only suffer more harm
We think it makes sense to start moving towards the centre cautiously, from cannabis use but report
monitoring health and other effects as we go. We can learn from legal problems resulting from
experience with the alcohol and tobacco industries. This means ensuring their use at nearly twice the
that we never have a cannabis industry influencing future governments rate of Europeans and others.
to put profits before health considerations. Source: New Zealand Health Survey 2012/13
DRUG POLICY SPECTRUM
Unregulated Unregulated
criminal legal
market market
Social and health harms
PROHIBITION DECRIMINALISATION RESPONSIBLE LIGHT UNRESTRICTED
& HARM REDUCTION LEGAL REGULATION REGULATION ACCESS
DIFFERENT DRUGS DIFFERENT DEGREES OF REGULATION
www.drugfoundation.org.nz A model drug law to 2020 and beyond 07So how would this Under our model, it would no
longer be an offence to possess,
cannabis market look? use, grow or sell cannabis within
strictly regulated guidelines.
GROW SELL/BUY
Cannabis grown by licensed suppliers or in Cannabis would be sold at
small amounts at home licensed outlets and from
a single, regulated website
under
under
18
18
Regulated commercial supply Growing at home Licensed shops
We want to promote small-scale People should be able to grow For health reasons, we want
community development and enough cannabis for their own to keep the amount of cannabis
avoid developing a powerful needs but not so much that a sold and consumed as low
industry lobby. It makes sense black market would be created. as possible and not attract
to keep growers as small scale new people (especially
OUR MODEL:
as possible and make it easy young people) to try it.
to register as a grower. We do • Individuals can grow up We think this lends itself
need to register growers though, to three mature plants each to developing a retail
to ensure cannabis is free from (maximum six per household) environment that is as dry
pesticides and is tested regularly for personal consumption. and uninteresting as possible
for potency levels. Plants should not be visible and that is not highly visible
from the street. on the street.
OUR MODEL:
• People may gift homegrown
• A central authority licenses and We also don’t want to
cannabis to adult friends
regulates commercial growers. compound the harms
but may not sell it.
caused by consuming
• The total number of plants
cannabis alongside tobacco
for each grower is restricted.
and alcohol, so we should
• Active assistance is provided keep retail outlets separate
for smaller growers to access from each other.
the market, for example,
by providing pre-approved
packaging and assisting
growers to register. From a health perspective, it would
• Having a previous cannabis be better if those under 25 didn’t use
cannabis, but that’s an unrealistic
conviction does not prevent goal. It makes practical sense to
registration as a grower. align the cannabis age limit with the
alcohol age limit, and use techniques
such as banning advertising and
keeping prices high to limit use by
young people.
08 A model drug law to 2020 and beyond www.drugfoundation.org.nzCONSUME
OUR MODEL: Online sales Consumption of cannabis at
• Licensed shops would only sell We propose that online sales of home or at licensed events only
cannabis products and utensils. cannabis would be allowed but
• Shops would be situated through a single website only,
a minimum distance from operated by a non-profit under
schools, alcohol off-licences contract to the government.
and other cannabis outlets. This could be run similarly to
Trade Me, with licensed retailers
• Only those over 18 would be
able to offer small quantities for
allowed to enter.
sale in a controlled way.
• No products or advertising
would be visible from the street. One major benefit of this approach In line with our cautious
is that small-scale growers who approach, we want to keep the
• Licensed premises would
are currently operating illegally consumption of cannabis and
display public health
can become part of the mainstream alcohol separate, at least initially.
information and advice around
economy, bringing economic Current evidence is inconclusive
moderating use and provide
development to areas of the around whether health and other
details on how to access help
country that desperately need it. harms (such as traffic accidents,
for drug-use issues.
At the same time, centralised for example) are magnified or
• Staff would be trained in
online sales would make it easy reduced overall where cannabis
health-related aspects such
and cheap to regulate suppliers can be consumed in public places
as looking out for signs
and their products. alongside alcohol. Experiences
of dependency.
from other countries such as
OUR MODEL:
A central authority would be Canada – which will soon legalise
• Website sales allowed through cannabis – will provide useful
responsible for issuing licences
one website only, with research on this. In the meantime,
to sell cannabis based on clear,
government oversight. we recommend keeping
health-focused criteria. In addition,
• Strict age checks at point consumption to the private
territorial authorities would have
of purchase and registered sphere as much as possible.
the option to implement a policy
delivery by courier only where This approach also supports
prohibiting retail outlets within
the purchaser is at home and is our desire to not attract new
certain areas. In those cases,
over 18. people to try it, especially
online sales would fill the gap.
• Health information provided to young people.
all consumers and heavy users
OUR MODEL:
offered pathways into treatment,
if needed. • Cannabis to be consumed only
• Levies taken at point of sale at home or by special licence
to cover administration costs at events.
as well as research, education,
treatment and prevention
programmes.
www.drugfoundation.org.nz A model drug law to 2020 and beyond 09$150M
ESTIMATES BY TREASURY OFFICIALS
IN 2016 PREDICTED THAT
LEGALISING CANNABIS COULD
COLLECT AN EXTRA $150 MILLION
PER YEAR IN TAX REVENUE AND
SAVE $400 MILLION A YEAR ON
DRUG PROHIBITION ENFORCEMENT.
REGULATE
The system would be regulated under the Act. They would need
int
undertR1the
epr ch 201
Ma
r Psychoactive
6
to show their product poses no
as a t more than a low risk of harm and What about medicinal
SubstancesRep rch 20 Act 2013
1M
rin
a
16
cannabis?
as a
t
meets criteria around portion
control, potency and packaging. Cannabis-based medicines would
continue to be available through the
201
3 Pricing and taxes existing pharmaceutical approvals
es Act model. We would like to see these
t anc 13 Keeping prices high, but not too medicines easier to access and fully
ubs o 53 ct 20
ctive S 3N
201 es20A 13
c hoa ct sta7nJucly Pag
e
high, is a key way to reduce subsidised.
Psy o5n32
lic A b 1
u i
vessSent
P u b seNc t o 6
see13
acetoif a mAenctt 20 July 201 2 demand for a product. If the price
3
choDat
7
Pag
e In addition, using raw cannabis in a
Psy ommPeunbclic sentonte1ntsee section
e 7
6
C as C s is
7 set too low, consumption therapeutic way, such as for pain
e of
The Act already establishes a
Dat
enc
eme
nt
ents relief, would no longer be illegal.
Com
m
Con
t increases
7 – too high, and the black
regulatory authority and t1
aionworkable
s
7
Par provis a t ters market
8
7
8 takes over. To reduce We may need new regulations to
regimeTitcovering
le cem
ent licensing,
lim
inar
y
inar
ym 79 protect those who take cannabis for
C o m men Pre
— a P relrimt
rt 1 P y prov matter
1 i s i o ns
s consumption,
8 we can and should
marketing,
1
retailing
men Su
t bpa and ar
min limina
penalties
ry
8 therapeutic purposes. For example,
2 e
Titl mence Pr e l i
re control 9
the price of cannabis using we should ensure that retailers do not
for breaches.
1 Com For Sexample, ubp
art 1
—P
it n 9
2
u r pos es
e
c t t a tio taxation, as we do with cigarettes. make misleading health claims about
already specifies
P cipl
Prin lication
of heavy fines
A
—In l
terp for
r e
139
3
A pp sie w r o wn p a rt 2 e r a n their products.
selling45 to those POuvrer ciipnldess twho
pov C
he Act Su
of
b
are underage Gen reta
terp subs
tio nce
ta By setting 13 a minimum price for
36 PArcint blication —In tive
own art 2 ychnoearacl
or manufacturing
47 A pp iew
rv
Ove binds t n
heproducts
C r
Su of psGe without
b p
nce cannabis, we can avoid the issues
5 ing stan
ce bsta
Act pretati
o ean sub e su
a licence.67 It could Inte
r beMychtailoredo a c tive
sy c h oatoctiv we have seen in some states in
ffic
ial re
prin
t.
s of p e in th
is o
ofopn ing tanc
regulate a8 cannabis Inte
M a
er
iprnegtati market.
n M ean
acti
v e s ubs
hav
America where cannabis has
e be
enmad
e
ial re
prin
t.
1
cho 012 d. offic
98
ning
o f psy
ti o
gisla dments
nA
ct 2
in corp
orate
en m
a d e in
this
become increasingly cheaper What about drug driving?
OUR MODEL: Mea L e b e
e en ve
of th e am 2 ha 1
9
art 2
of P
art 2 st o
f th
s a li Health lation
. Act
201
inco
as production costs have fallen.
rpora
ted.
• The Act is altered to allow the sed
b y s ubp
repri
nt p ro vide
tr y
inis of th
o f
e L e gis
e am
en d m ents Drug driving will continue to be a
Note thori this e M rt 2 f th
Cha
nge
s au
e en
d of db
tere part
y th 2 of Pa st o
s a li Health
.
OUR MODEL: concern under the new law. Currently
sale of raw cannabis by licensed 4 at th
Note ct is adorised
m inis by sub
repri
nt p ro vide
inis
tr y o f
the Police carry out impairment tests
Nohte A uth this eM
T is nges a y th
vendors. Cha
4 at th
e en
d of
m inis
tere
db
• Cannabis sales are subject to when they have reason to suspect a
Note ct is ad
• Strict regulations around
This
A
minimum pricing. driver has taken drugs. This system
works well and we don’t propose
advertising, sponsorship, gifting • Higher-potency products have
changing it for now.
and promotional deals, as set out a higher minimum price.
We would like to see a public
in the Act. • Levies are payable on each education campaign around drug
• Packaging is child-proof and purchase, with proceeds driving, that would use some of the
includes information on potency, earmarked to cover regulatory same techniques that have been so
costs as well as drug treatment, successful in changing behaviour
recommended dose and how to
around drink driving.
access treatment if needed, along education and prevention
with prominent health warnings. programmes.
• Those wishing to sell products • Levies also cover the costs of
other than raw cannabis (such as regular research, monitoring
edibles or concentrates) would and evaluation of the effects
apply separately for approval of the new law.
10 A model drug law to 2020 and beyond www.drugfoundation.org.nzOur model law
promotes Māori equity
Whakawätea te huarahi, Ko tö mätou ture tauira hei mana taurite mö
te mäori. Ko te Tiriti o Waitangi i waiho iho nei te mana taurite ki ngä
Iwi mäori me ngä tauiwi hoki o Aotearoa. Kei päkinikini tonu te mäori
i ngä ture tarutaru me nga raruraru whaimana hoki. E hë ana te ture
tarutaru nei, na te mea e noho pähikahika nui ngä mäori ki ngä tauiwi
i mauhere i ngä whare herehere i Aotearoa. He mea whakahirahira ki
tö mätou ture tauira hei häpai te orangätonutangä o te tängata whenua
o Aotearoa. Mana taurite mäori, mana taurite mäori, mana taurite
mäori, Arä, Whakawätea te huarahi!
Te Tiriti o Waitangi guarantees legal equality between Mäori and
other citizens of Aotearoa. We don’t see that under our current drug
law, which guarantees only hugely disproportionate imprisonment
and conviction rates for Mäori. Our proposals will benefit Mäori by
reducing Mäori drug convictions by as many as 1,300 per year. That
means fewer tangata whenua coming into contact with the criminal
justice system and fewer trapped in endless cycles of reconviction.
Our proposals will also improve health outcomes for Mäori by
significantly increasing the amount spent on drug treatment. We also
want to actively promote equity by ensuring Mäori communities feel
the financial benefits from a regulated cannabis market.
We feel strongly that, for the new law to be a success, Mäori need to be
a part of its development and implementation. We’re travelling around
the country over the next months to hear from as many people as possible
about how this should look. We also welcome feedback online.
Percentage experiencing legal Lifetime prevalence of any Ethnicity of those in prison with
problems from cannabis use in substance use disorder drug offences as their main
past 12 months (2012)
26.5%
offence 2010–2014
3.4%
1.9% 12.3% 60.4% 39.6%
Māori
Māori Total Population
Others
Māori experience more harm from drugs
Among cannabis users, nearly twice as – they are more than twice as likely to suffer
many Māori as non-Māori report legal a substance use disorder in their lifetime Māori
problems from their use than the general population European/Other
Source: Cannabis Use 2012/13: New Zealand Source: MA Oakley Browne, JE Wells, KM Scott (eds). Māori make up about 40% of those
Health Survey, page 12 2006. Te Rau Hinengaro: The New Zealand Mental in prison for drug offences
Health Survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
Source: Statistics NZ online tables, annual sentenced
prisoner throughput for latest calendar years
www.drugfoundation.org.nz A model drug law to 2020 and beyond 11We need to invest
in prevention, harm
reduction and treatment
WE PROPOSE:
To reduce drug harm
• Increasing investment in drug prevention and education that is
effectively, we need to
evidence-based
invest in these things:
• Removing legal barriers to providing harm-reduction services such
as supervised consumption rooms and drug checking Prevention and education.
This will mean that, if people do
• Doubling the funding for treatment services to eliminate waiting lists
make the choice to use drugs, they
• Ensuring a full range of treatment options are funded, including start later in life, use less frequently
community and whānau-based services and experience less harm.
Harm reduction.
This includes information and tools
If your son or daughter was struggling with their drug use, would
that reduce the risk of drug harm,
you prefer they receive effective and timely treatment or face a for example, providing sterile
jail sentence? injecting equipment.
In 2014/15, we spent $268 million enforcing our drug laws but only Treatment.
$78.3 million on drug-related health interventions. How might things Effective treatment means providing
look if the scales were switched? a range of options to suit different
people, from support groups and
We’d like to see all those who need support able to access a full range one-to-one counselling to more
of evidence-based treatment options at the time that they need them. intensive support such as detox or
residential treatment.
Investing in prevention, harm reduction and treatment is not only
effective but also humane.
$M
3.5x 273.1
In 2014/15, to address a $1.8 billion
drug problem, we spent at least 3.5X
more on drug-related law enforcement
than on health interventions.
$M
78.3Health
Source: New Zealand Drug Harm Index 2016 Police, Courts and
Corrections
12 A model drug law to 2020 and beyond www.drugfoundation.org.nzTimeline for reform
Our vision is a staged approach.
Review the offences
and penalties regime for
drug possession, Review the Psychoactive New law to replace
as required by the Substances Act 2013 Launch a
MoDA comes into force
National Drug Policy. (PSA), as required public information
and drug use is
by the Act. campaign.
decriminalised.
2017 2018 2019 2020
Draft and introduce Update the PSA to
a new law to replace Parliamentary get it working as it was
the Misuse of Drugs Act process to approve intended and allow drugs
1975 (MoDA). new Bill. currently falling under
MoDA to be assessed
for inclusion.
2020
O N WA R D S • Reclassify cannabis as a • Undertake regular research, • Review the new law and the
low-harm substance within the monitoring and evaluation on PSA at 5-year intervals.
PSA and begin developing a drug use and drug harm under
regulated market. the new legislation.
E mahi ana ki te whakahoro Working for an
Aotearoa i ngā hē ā tarukino Aotearoa New Zealand
free from drug harm
The NZ Drug Foundation works to reduce Getting people around the table to find Website:
drug-related harm in Aotearoa New Zealand. effective solutions to drug issues is at the http://nzdrug.org/drug-law-2020
Formed in 1989, the Drug Foundation has heart of our work. Ensuring that the interests
always been about basing policy and law on of tangata whenua are reflected in both policy
Services we run or support
evidence and an acceptance of public health and practical services is a key part of our
values. Over the past 28 years, we have work, as is maintaining close links with people
contributed to significant change in how working in treatment agencies, harm-reduction
New Zealand responds to alcohol, tobacco services and education programmes.
and other drug use. Our work spans policy,
public education, information delivery and
community engagement.
www.drugfoundation.org.nz A model drug law to 2020 and beyond 13So what do
you think?
We want our model drug law to be as good as it can be.
Please tell us what you think. Are our proposals workable?
What parts would you change and why?
We will be bringing as many voices together as possible this
year to develop consensus around a workable model. We’ll be
holding community hui and talking to iwi, politicians, service
providers, people who use drugs and many others.
Please let us know what you think of our model drug law
proposal by
• Attending one of our hui
• Giving feedback online at http://nzdrug.org/drug-law-2020
• Filling out the form below and returning it to us at
NZ Drug Foundation, PO Box 3082, Wellington 6140
YOUR COMMENTS
I mostly agree with this proposal
I mostly disagree with this proposal
comments?
New Zealand Drug Foundation | July 2017You can also read
