Real World Data and its promise for medicine and research
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
A not-for-profit health and tax policy research organization August, 2014 Real World Data and its promise for medicine and research By Grace-Marie Turner Better access to data about real world patient While the potential is great, the future of experience holds enormous potential to help RWD is highly uncertain. Governments and achieve many of the goals of health reform, private health care companies who including improving the quality and delivery administer government-sponsored health of medical care, reducing costs, and insurance have vast databases of improving safety and outcomes by information, primarily medical claims. Most accelerating the knowledge base upon which of this information is inaccessible to the the development of new treatments and researchers who are developing the next cures relies. generation of treatments and cures, such as pharmaceutical and medical device Capturing data about the actual experience companies and academics. of patients outside of the carefully controlled clinical trial setting – Real World Data – can Longstanding policies by the Department of help fill the knowledge gap between clinical Health and Human Services deny access to trials and clinical practice. RWD offers a federal Medicare A, B, D, Medicaid, and treasure-trove of information that could other data sets on Prescription Drug Event allow providers, innovators, health plans, (PDE) data by entities with commercial researchers, and others in the scientific and interests, yet these are the very entities that medical communities to make faster, more we rely on to invest in the expensive process efficient, and less costly advances in of bringing new treatments to patients. medical research and clinical treatment. Life These policies inhibit medical research and sciences companies can use this data to ultimately are detrimental to patients whose explore the benefits and risks of treatment care could be improved by access to more options including their effectiveness in robust information. In cases where patient subpopulations, expedite enrollment academics are able to request access to the in clinical trials, identify new targets for government data, the cost is often research and development, and transform the prohibitive. value equation in medical care. 1 Real World Data has the potential to support However, there are obstacles that must be a more personalized model of care that can removed for the promise and potential of enhance patient outcomes, improve quality Real World Data to be realized. of care, facilitate access to appropriate innovative therapies, lower costs, and improve the efficiency of care delivery. Officers: Grace-Marie Turner, President • Cleta Mitchell, Esq., Vice Chairman • Thomas C. Jackson, Treasurer • John S. Hoff, Esq., Secretary P.O. Box 320010 • Alexandria, VA 22320 • Phone 703-299-8900 • Fax 703-299-0721 • www.galen.org
This paper will seek to identify the biggest analyzed to gain new insight into products, challenges the industry will face as it moves processes, relationships, and outcomes. It towards a wide use of real world data, can be used to quickly test new ideas and including policy obstacles that must be even shape predictions. Big Data focuses on overcome, the important protection of finding trends and patterns which would be patient privacy, and the development of difficult, expensive, and even impossible to systems that allow for real world application find using traditional information-gathering of these massive data sets. and information-processing methods. In contrast, the centerpiece of Real World The promise Data involves the narrower realm of information on actual patient contact and Real World Data (RWD) can provide eventually, outcomes data. By information on how patients are treated in understanding more about this process of clinical practice and sometimes the care, researchers can employ advanced outcomes of the treatments. Real world is analytics to make medical care more contrasted with the much more carefully- targeted, efficient, and effective and thereby controlled realm of controlled clinical trials reduce unnecessary treatments and which provide data on the cause and effect expenditures, including hospitalizations. relationship of specific treatment There are a number of reasons why RWD is interventions, but which do not provide important to researchers – and to patients information about how the interventions are and health care providers – to improve used and work in real world settings. quality and efficiency in the health care Additionally, clinical trial data may not system and ultimately to improve outcomes. reflect the diversity of the actual patient Some advantages: population that uses the treatment. • Enabling more knowledgeable RWD sources can include electronic choices by doctors and patients medical records created by care providers, • More precise monitoring of data used to coordinate and pay for care, medications and other medical payment information collected by private treatments and public plans and programs, and first- • Supporting systems that pay for hand information from patients on actual value and quality rather than the experiences. Information derived from volume of care delivered RWD can be extremely useful to researchers • Better management of care and costs to learn the effectiveness of treatments and under new payment paradigms medicines in practice, to develop new • Better management of targeted treatments and cures, and also produce patient populations, especially high information on the comparative value of risk patients different types of medical and surgical • More clarity for investors in new interventions. research and development projects • More precise design of clinical Some policymakers misinterpret RWD as trials, including gathering Big Data. “Big Data” is an emerging field information about which that seems to have no uniformly accepted subpopulations of patients may definition. In concept, it involves research benefit the most from specific in which a vast amount of information from therapies multiple large and diverse data sets can be
• Identifying patients appropriate for and provide timely interventions. “A inclusion in clinical trials combined and coordinated application of • Assessment of the value of new and these new technologies could ultimately sometimes breakthrough control the increasing burden of healthcare, interventions speed up development of new therapeutic • Assessment of safety and efficacy as drugs and increase the quality and value of required by regulatory agencies and patient-centered healthcare data allowing for payers a deeper understanding of patients’ disease • Promoting more rapid collection and and well being,” according to Moncef dissemination of information to Slaoui, chairman of global research and improve safety and patient care development and vaccines at • Better understanding of how GlaxoSmithKline. 4 complex combination of medical interventions may benefit patients Read and Slaoui are among the many apart from the structured clinical trial industry leaders responding to the Energy setting and Commerce Committee’s request for information on what is needed to “ensure we Congress is paying attention are taking full advantage of the advances this country has made in science and House Energy and Commerce Committee technology and use these resources to keep Chairman Fred Upton and Rep. Diana America as the innovation capital of the DeGette are soliciting ideas from a broad world.” range of experts as part of an initiative they are leading: The Path to 21st Century Cures. 2 “Releasing more of the data housed in They are “looking at the full arc of this government datasets to qualified process – from the discovery of clues in researchers, and connecting it across basic science, to streamlining the drug and multiple sources could dramatically improve device development process, to unleashing the innovation cycle,” Read wrote to the the power of digital medicine and social Committee, “as unlocking and analyzing media at the treatment delivery phase.” data will enable better decision making between patients and physicians and In a white paper submitted to the committee, innovation in care delivery and new Pfizer Chairman and CEO Ian Read said that treatments.” “Ensuring access to real world data captured in [electronic medical records], medical Senate Finance Committee leaders also are claims databases or registries is vital to seeking ideas to improve data transparency. nearly all stakeholders and can provide Chairman Ron Wyden and ranking member crucial information by elucidating unmet Charles Grassley say the volume of health needs in our current system and information care data is growing exponentially but that about the efficiency of healthcare delivery, policies and strategies to harness the data are and helping to demonstrate value, efficacy, lagging. They are soliciting ideas from and safety.” 3 stakeholders on what data should be made publicly available, how the data should be The digital era will provide an explosion of presented to the public, and what reforms new ways to collect data from mobile are needed to facilitate access and usability communications devices and biosensors, of the data. 5 including remote patient monitoring to better understand their response to treatment 3
The value of collaboration work together in addressing specific problems, such as pharmacovigilance, In an information age, pharmaceutical and biomarkers, and diabetes. Other companies device companies, academic institutions, are developing their own collaborations on and healthcare providers are among those RWD. AstraZeneca and HealthCore, for who need resources outside their research example, are collaborating on studies laboratories to advance medical progress, designed to determine how to most including developing the next generation of effectively and economically treat disease. treatments and cures. The collaboration includes observational studies of comparative effectiveness and the Companies in the health sector see the value efficacy of medicines in several disease not only of greater access to real world data areas. 7 but also to data partnerships where they can work together to speed research and Pfizer collaborated with Humana to address development. For example, Merck began a pain inefficiencies associated with opioid collaboration in 2012 with researchers from abuse to identify high risk patients, and the the Regenstrief Institute at the University of companies jointly developed a predictive Indiana to fund collaborations among model. 8 They are now working together on researchers from a variety of fields – clinical evaluating an intervention that leverages the and basic sciences, computational biology, predictive model to identify and computer science, and global and public appropriately manage patients at risk for health. opioid abuse. An important data source for the project is In the future in the United States, the Indiana Network of Patient Care (INPC), collaborations are possible and likely among an 18-year-old health information exchange health care plans, pharmaceutical that provides clinical information from 80 companies, hospitals, diagnostic companies, hospitals, public health departments, as well as technology companies to “develop laboratories, imaging centers, and some a holistic and predictive approach to physician practices. The INPC has more healthcare,” according to Ian Read. The than 4.5 billion pieces of clinical data for key, however, is greater access to more than 13 million patients. This is information about how treatments are used uniquely valuable for observational and their outcomes in real world settings. research, providing clinical and claims data as well as discharge reports, clinical notes, and medication orders. They will Claims data and transparency investigate how Patient A responded to a treatment regimen vs Patient B, what were Several health plans are joining together to the characteristics of the patients and their create a payment database to make health conditions, and how outcomes differed care pricing information available to the based upon such criteria as drug adherence. 6 public at no charge. United Healthcare, Aetna, and Humana are working with the Collaborative efforts also are underway in Health Care Cost Institute (HCCI), a non- Europe with the Innovative Medicines profit group established in 2011. Professor Initiative. Launched in 2008, this is the Stephen Parente of the University of biggest private partnership in Europe to Minnesota’s Carlton School of Management enable pharmaceutical and biotech is chair of HCCI’s board. The project is companies and academic researchers to slated to go live in 2015 and will include
claims data from commercial Medicare These state databases may or may not be Advantage plans and Medicaid. There are available to commercial entities, however, challenges in the effort since these and they also don’t capture patient competing health plans are not accustomed experiences. They are all built around to sharing information and to having claims data which only captures utilization information that can be integrated across and not necessarily utility of health care their different platforms. Nonetheless, other services. The Patient-Centered Outcomes health plans are considering joining the Research Institute (PCORI) is providing endeavor, showing the energy behind funds to several patient organizations to collecting and disseminating huge data develop databases that also capture patient resources. experiences in certain disease areas. PCORI is spending $100 million to create the The demand for cost transparency is being National Patient-Centered Clinical Research spurred by a number of developments, Network. PCORNet is designed to create a including the move to higher-deductible real world data resource for comparative health plans in which consumers have a effectiveness research collected from health greater incentive to shop for the best value care systems and patient networks. The goal in health services. is to “advance the shift in clinical research from investigator-driven to patient-centered As a result, a number of states also are studies.” 10 starting to make claims data available. The National Conference of State Legislatures in 2013 assessed state efforts at making pricing The demonstrated need for data information accessible to consumers. and analytics Massachusetts and New Hampshire got “A”s but most states got “F”s. These failing While RWD holds great promise, and some grades have motivated many states to pass exciting collaborations are underway, the legislation requiring hospitals and other field is still in its infancy. The President’s medical providers to post prices they’ve Council of Advisors on Science and negotiated with insurers for a long list of Technology (PCAST) 11 has cited the services. nation’s inadequate health data infrastructure as a barrier to improvement in Other states are going further and creating the quality of American health care. PCAST all-payer claims databases (APCD) that says that our antiquated fee-for-service require commercial insurers, self-funded payment system must be replaced with large employer plans, Medicaid, and other payment models that reward value rather health care payment programs within their than volume to improve the quality of care. borders to make their claims data available And these new payment models will depend to the government. So far, 19 states have upon metrics, especially outcomes created APCDs, and at least 21 others are measurements. They specifically cite the considering laws to create them. 9 Privacy need to increase access to health data and protections are, of course, crucial, but analytics. government can help facilitate a better- functioning market by making clear and RWD is equally important to protect patients accurate information from its own data from harm. The example of Vioxx is a case sources more widely available. in point. The drug was approved by the FDA in 1999 and marketed by Merck & Co. to treat arthritis and other conditions causing 5
chronic and acute pain. Worldwide, more found that the pharmacy data provided a than 80 million people were prescribed the stable and valid indication of a patient’s drug at some time. health status. The data was predictive regarding health care visits and The drug was withdrawn from the market in hospitalizations. Such tools are cost- 2004, however, because of evidence of an effective ways to do screening and to increased risk of heart attack and stroke anticipate the need for interventions. 12 associated with long-term, high-dosage use. Others have since replicated the findings. 13 It became clear that the drug could be This method of assessing risk also has been dangerous to patients with serious heart replicated for pediatric patients. 14 disease. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Collection of real world data would have Services proposed a rule on January 10, highlighted this danger much earlier, likely 2014, [CMS-4159-P) about whether or not eliciting a Black Box warning for patients commercial enterprises would finally be with heart disease. Instead, all patients were able to have access to Medicare Part D denied the drug, even those who said it prescription drug data for research. There is provided better pain management than any no question that this data could be competing products. invaluable to researchers and thereby to clinicians and patients. The Healthcare A more robust collection of information can Leadership Council (HLC) and the National assure patients are receiving the right drug, Pharmaceutical Council were among those even the right dosage, and help providers offering detailed comments, arguing that, learn how to better target treatments. “In an aligned, high functioning healthcare system, everyone should be able to benefit financially from effective use of data to Pharmacy data and Medicare improve quality and efficiency in the Part D healthcare system…Patient level information is needed to achieve the very Prescribing data are among the most care transformation CMS seeks.” 15 valuable and reliable resources for researchers because of the strong predictive The Affordable Care Act relies heavily on relationship between prescription drug use commercial enterprises to implement the and medical diagnoses. Accurate pharmacy law, especially private health plans offered claims data also are widely available through the exchanges and private Medicaid because of the established third-party managed care companies that are offering payment system in the United States. coverage through the optional expansion. But these entities are barred from accessing Automated outpatient pharmacy data the valuable information that could help provide a rich vein of information that guide the efficiency authors of the law research has shown to provide a stable sought to create. The Healthcare Leadership measure of health status. 1 A groundbreaking Council observed that “…any notion that study by Von Korff and colleagues at Puget commercial interests is limited and discrete Sound Group Health Cooperative created a is outdated.” measure of chronic disease status using automatic outpatient pharmacy data. They
CMS finalized its Medicare Part D rule in and use of the data, especially pertaining to May, 2014, and concluded that the Part D confidentiality and protection of the data. information still may not be used for commercial purposes, although it left the Some organizations are experimenting with door open for reconsideration of its decision. private “clouds” to collect electronic “Commenters stated that the challenging of medical record information and store it quantifying greater efficiency and evidence securely. Private companies also are of improvement as part of the overall health developing sophisticated cryptographic reform requires more access to the unique methods that place security tags on data and data sets in federal data, and that the current assign specific access rights to specific restriction on the use of these data for users. 17 These security tools, first developed commercial purposes will grow increasingly to support national intelligence agencies, can challenging in the future as Medicare “place different levels of security on employs more value-based payment different types of data, from demographic incentives, and as Medicare data are information to highly sensitive health data.” included in broader multi-payer sets, such as those being established by the Patient- The importance of protection of patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute,” the privacy cannot be overstated, but advanced CMS rule notes. 16 information technologies have the potential to both gather the information and offer The quality and efficiency of health care multiple levels of protection. Receiving delivery would be enhanced if the patients’ consent to have their medical companies actually creating and delivering information anonymously aggregated into new medical treatments were to have access these massive data bases can support to comprehensive Real World Data. This patients’ desire to help others with similar information would allow them to identify conditions and illnesses. Guidelines, of effective interventions to better manage care course, are needed to develop viable consent for high-risk patients, do a better job of forms and mechanisms. avoiding hospital readmissions, identify factors that would improve medication At the same time, technological advances adherence, and develop new diagnostics to are especially needed to speed the collection better target therapies to patients who are of this data in the clinical setting so as not to most likely to benefit. further burden physicians, nurses, and other medical practitioners with mountains of forms and reporting requirements. Privacy protection and security There would, of course, need to be Challenges to RWD contractual agreements that protect the use of sensitive data. All researchers should be Companies in the health care industry face a subject to the same rules for data access and number of challenges as they move toward a data protection if access to Personal Health wide use of real world data, including: Information Medicare data were to be allowed. These criteria would include: A • Collection of data: Collecting RWD strong design of the research project, efficiently and effectively to improve expertise and experience of the researcher, clinical practice and development of and strong agreements concerning handling new medical treatments. 7
• Electronic Medical Records: commissioning studies and work with Developing electronic medical patient groups to collect patient experience record standards that contain useful data in certain prevalent disease areas, but information to enable analysts access much more work needs to be done. the information across platforms Building these capabilities is a long and • Harmonization: Combining data expensive process, but it is crucial to future generated across different sites of success in research. The first step is access to care that can be aggregated in order existing payment data including Medicare. to be useful to researchers. Volumes Next will be patient-approved use of of data are being collected but information from electronic medical records, inconsistent coding and analysis and then collecting useable data from patient experience with built-in privacy protections. standards hinder the optimal use of RWD for decision making. Conclusion • Privacy: Addressing the very real issue of protection of patient privacy The 21st century may well be defined as the century of medical discoveries. Advancing this vision requires building on the • Cost: Overcoming the high (and extraordinary opportunities to collect, often inhibitive) initial costs of capture, and analyze information so that we purchasing the data can build a rapid learning health care system. Real world data is a vital • Accessibility: Changing policies to component of that progress. make information available. Even if the data were not prohibitively Real world data has the potential to expensive, commercial interests, complement clinical trial evidence by such as pharmaceutical researchers, providing information that can dramatically are banned to having access to improve current standards of care. It also Medicare data, as explained in the can provide evidence to enhance safety and previous section. This blocks those outcomes. But there are challenges: The on the front lines of medical research quality of the data may be uneven and from having access to a rich vein of difficult to harmonize and therefore analyze. RWD that could lead to new and Patient privacy must be protected. And better treatments, and at lower costs policy obstacles abound in providing access than current research tools and to the data. techniques allow. Information is key to the next generation of Most RWD data sets are claims data which medical discoveries, and real world data is may or may not demonstrate cause and key to unlocking clues that will enable better effect relationships of certain interventions decision making between patients and or innovative therapies. In addition, claims physicians to improve care delivery and data do not capture valuable information outcomes. The time has come to unleash a about patient experiences that can be new generation of information-based combined with claims data to provide a improvements in the quality and efficiency meaningful picture of the impact of such of health care through effective use of Real endeavors on quality of life and patient World Data. satisfaction. As noted earlier, the Patient- Centered Outcomes Research Institute is
Grace-Marie Turner is president of the Galen Institute, a non-profit research organization focusing on health policy and innovation. ENDNOTES 1 Carino, T. “Real-World Data Will Drive the Future of Healthcare Innovation.” The Morning Consult, June 16, 2014. 2 Energy and Commerce Committee. 21st Century Cures Initiative. http://energycommerce.house.gov/cures 3 Read, I. “21st Century Cures Initiative: A Call to Action White Paper Response,” June 19, 2014. 4 Slaoui, M. Letter to Reps. Fred Upton and Diana DeGette of the Energy and Commerce Committee regarding the Committee’s 21st Century Cures Initiative, June 1, 2014. 5 Wyden R, Grassley C. Letter to Stakeholders, June 12, 2014. Letter on behalf of Senate Committee on Finance to Stakeholders. 6 Tsang T, Chatterjee A. “Innovations in Health Information Technology and Impact on Pharma: Merck Medical Information and Innovation,” Eyeforpharma conference, Philadelphia, April 2014. 7 Albrecht, JP. Draft report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individual with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Brussels: European Parliament, 2012. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/pr/922/922387/922387en.pdf 8 Pasquale, M. “Dr. Margaret K. Pasquale and Team Identify High-Risk Factors Predicting Opioid Abuse.” http://www.ajmc.com/ajmc-tv/interviews/Margaret-K-Pasquale-PhD-Identifies-Factors-in-High-Risk- Opioid-Use 9 Vestal, C. “Can claims data crack the health care cost riddle?” USA Today, June 17, 2014. 10 PCORnet: The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network is designed to “foster a range of observational and experimental CER by establishing a resource of clinical data gathered in ‘real-time’ and in ‘real-world’ settings, such as clinics. Data will be collected and stored in standardized, interoperable formats under rigorous security protocols, and data sharing across the network will be accomplished using a variety of methods that ensure confidentiality by preventing patient identification.” Full description available at: http://www.pcori.org/funding-opportunities/ pcornet-national-patient-centered-clinical- research-network/ 11 Robeznieka, A. “Poor data infrastructure hampers quality improvement, PCAST says,” Modern Healthcare, May 29, 2014 12 Von Korff M, Wagner EH, Saunders K. “A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data.” J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Feb;45(2):197-203. 13 Johnson RE, Hornbrook MC, Nichols GA. “Replicating the chronic disease score (CDS) from automated pharmacy data.” J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Oct; 47(10):1191-9. 14 Fishman P, Shay DK. “Development and estimation of a pediatric chronic disease score using automated pharmacy data.” Medical Care. Vol 37, No 9, pp 874-883. 9
15 Grande T, Dubois R. Letter to CMS Administrator Marilyn Tavenner, March 7, 2014. Available at: http://www.hlc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/HLC-NPC-Letter-on-CMS-Data-Access-3-7-14.pdf 16 Federal Register, May 23, 2014. Pp.29844 – 29968 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-05- 23/pdf/2014-11734.pdf 17 Roski J, Bo-Linn G, Andrews T. “Creating value in health care through big data: Opportunities and policy implications.” Health Affairs 33:7 July 2014.
You can also read