WA COVID-19 Testing Guidelines - State Health Incident Coordination Centre (SHICC) Department of Health, WA
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
WA COVID-19 Testing Guidelines State Health Incident Coordination Centre (SHICC) Department of Health, WA Version 3.0 09 January 2022
Version Control and Approval This document should be considered a ‘live document’ and will be reviewed and updated regularly in response to: • New legislation or statutory directions; • Changes in advice based on emerging evidence or national guidelines; • Learnings from outbreak management locally, in other jurisdictions and internationally; or • Stakeholder engagement and feedback. Review and update of this document is coordinated by the State Health Incident Coordination Centre (SHICC) Planning Cell which can be contacted with feedback at PHEOC@health.wa.gov.au. Version Date Author Approved by Comments on revision 1.0 03 December SHICC Dr Paul Armstrong Original version 2021 Planning Deputy Chief Health Cell Officer 2.0 04 January SHICC Dr Paul Armstrong Stakeholder feedback 2022 Planning Deputy Chief Health Table updated Cell Officer Hospital ED testing aligned to HSP framework for respiratory pathways Omicron variant information included 3.0 09 January SHICC Dr Revle Bangor- WA Health System Alert Levels 2022 Planning Jones Red and Black completed in table Cell A/Deputy Chief Health Table aligned to national policy Officer Removal of Outbreak testing Appendix C updated 2
Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 4 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Out of Scope ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Priority Groups for Testing ............................................................................................................... 5 Surveillance activities ........................................................................................................................ 6 Wastewater testing....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Whole genome sequencing ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Funding Considerations .................................................................................................................... 6 Legislative Considerations ............................................................................................................... 7 Omicron ............................................................................................................................................... 7 TTIQ ............................................................................................................................................................................... 7 WA COVID-19 Testing Framework ................................................................................................... 8 COVID-19 Testing Matrix ................................................................................................................... 9 Symptomatic Testing ................................................................................................................................................... 9 Asymptomatic Testing - Borders ................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Asymptomatic Testing – Hospitals (Staff) ............................................................................................................... 10 Asymptomatic Testing – Non-Hospital health settings ......................................................................................... 14 Asymptomatic Testing – Specific settings ................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. APPENDIX A: SARS-CoV-2 specific testing, Australia .................................................................16 APPENDIX B: Rapid Antigen Testing (RAT) ..................................................................................17 APPENDIX C: Current Directions for Testing ................................................................................19 Works Cited........................................................................................................................................21 3
Introduction It should be noted that these guidelines will be subject to frequent revision in response to changing epidemiology, emerging evidence, stakeholder feedback and experiential learning of effectiveness and logistical challenges. On 30 July 2021, the National Plan to Transition Australia’s COVID-19 Response was announced, which outlined federal plans for the opening of Australia’s interstate and international borders. Western Australia’s (WA’s) Safe Transition Plan for easing border controls once a 90% double dose vaccination rate is achieved was announced on 5 November 2021. The date for the easing of Western Australia’s border controls has been set for February 5th, 2022. The goal for the management of COVID-19 in Western Australia will transition from elimination to suppression of community transmission to a level that does not overwhelm health services. Test, trace, isolate and quarantine (TTIQ) practices will be an important part of the public health response to slow COVID-19 transmission, minimise serious illness, hospitalisation and death and ensure health system capacity. Slowing community transmission will allow time to achieve good vaccination coverage in the 5-11-year-old cohort, third dose vaccination for those eligible and maintain delivery of usual health services. High levels of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing and maintenance of rapid turnaround times for results, will be important to ensure case detection of COVID-19 and efficient contact tracing to contain an outbreak [1]. Maintenance of high PCR testing rates for symptomatic individuals is key to early detection of outbreaks during the transition phase; noting that the pressure on testing capacity will require the use of alternative testing methods, such as rapid antigen testing, at a certain level of community transmission and in specific settings [1]. Established community transmission and maximum utilisation of laboratory PCR testing capacity will lead to wider use of rapid antigen tests (RATs) to complement, but not replace, the PCR test as the gold standard test for diagnosis of SARS CoV-2 infection [2]. Where there is little or no community transmission of COVID-19, screening for the virus using RAT in low- risk settings (including workplaces) has limited benefit [3]. In these situations, it would be more beneficial for employers to encourage workers to apply COVIDSafe work practices, ensure high vaccination coverage, and for employees and their close contacts to get tested via PCR and isolate if symptoms develop [3]. In an environment with little or no community transmission, any non-negative RAT result must be followed up by a PCR test with the person isolating until the PCR result is known. RATs could be used as a screening test in occupational settings that have a potential for greater exposure to the SARS CoV-2 virus (such as quarantine workers, health care setting and border workers) with increased frequency of RAT testing improving sensitivity. Further information on the advantages and limitations of RAT is provided in Appendix B. The areas of testing this guideline will address which require state-level strategic planning are: 1. Symptomatic testing for self-presenting individuals 4
2. Asymptomatic testing for screening Objectives This paper will: 1. Outline PCR testing prioritisation and use after border restrictions in WA are relaxed. 2. Determine the role of rapid antigen testing (RAT) for screening. 3. Provide guidance for the use of RAT in WA, including in high-risk settings and workplaces. 4. Inform legislative changes to support the testing guidelines. Out of Scope Out of scope for this paper includes: • Wastewater surveillance, which is governed by a separate steering committee. • Emerging technologies such as extraction-free loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) Priority Groups for Testing The national framework [5] identified four priority groups for targeted testing in Australia: 1. People with COVID-19 compatible symptoms 2. People with known recent exposure to SARS-CoV-2 a) Household – secondary attack rate, can be close to 100% in some Australian households [1] b) Other contacts 3. People at higher risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 a) International or domestic travellers b) Health care workers with direct patient contact c) Aged and disability care workers with direct patient contact d) Border staff e) Quarantine centre workers f) Workers transporting persons arriving to WA via air or sea g) Aircrew h) Maritime crew 4. People in high risk settings where disease amplification is likely, or where people live or visit who are at increased risk of severe disease. For example: a) High population density settings b) People living or working in proximity to others e.g. Congregate living c) Specific environmental conditions d) Remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities e) Secure facilities (correctional and detention facilities) f) Mining and Offshore sites 5
g) Food processing, distribution, and cold storage facilities, including abattoirs – (Industrial facilities) h) Residential aged care facilities i) Hospitals j) Schools and childcare facilities The testing approach used in WA must be adaptable and responsive to the introduction of community transmission when border restrictions are relaxed and must strike the right balance between limiting community transmission through case finding and controlling outbreaks, and protecting the sustainability of laboratory and testing site capacity [5]. Surveillance activities Wastewater testing The WA Department of Health led SARS-CoV-2 Wastewater Surveillance Program commenced on 17 September 2020, with the aim of providing information about the existence of COVID-19 disease (active or recovered) within the WA community, by detecting non- infectious genetic material shed by cases or recovering cases, in order to complement existing and future clinical COVID-19 surveillance activities. Whole genome sequencing Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is used to compare the genomic relatedness from multiple COVID-19 cases to facilitate investigations by public health units. It has also allowed mutational analysis for Variants of Concern (VoC) [6]. While a comprehensive WGS strategy of sequencing all suitable SARS-CoV-2 positive clinical specimens is possible in a low prevalence setting, this will not occur when case numbers rise and a change in genomic surveillance to selective and targeted sequencing will be required. With the recommencing of international travel the potential for importation of new VoC will increase. Indeed, this has been highlighted in the recent detection of the Omicron variant: B.1.1.529 detected in Southern Africa. Where there is an accepted level of community transmission, it will not be necessary to sequence all samples where COVID-19 has been acquired in Australia, but a testing approach will be required to ensure detection of new variants with increased transmissibility/virulence and vaccine escape occurs in a timely manner. Considerations for targeting sequencing for cases include: • Sampling all positive cases acquired overseas • Sampling one or two cases from identified clusters • Sentinel surveillance through community-based surveillance, including samples from those who are fully or partially vaccinated • Sampling of hospitalised cases [1]. Funding Considerations • PCR testing for COVID-19 that is mandated under a Public Health Order or Emergency Management Act Order is funded under the National Partnership on COVID-19 response. This is a 50:50 cost shared arrangement between the Commonwealth Government and jurisdictions. 6
• The funding for rapid antigen testing in residential aged care facilities is the responsibility of the Commonwealth Government. • Any testing that has been requested or arranged from the Public Health team as part of a COVID-19 outbreak response is the responsibility of the WA government. • Any surveillance testing in a workplace performed outside of a public health outbreak response, will be the responsibility of the workplace or organisation. Legislative Considerations A comprehensive list of all current Directions related to testing are contained in Appendix C. This includes Directions and Chief Health Officer (CHO) approvals for testing made under the Emergency Management Act 2005 (WA) and the Public Health Act 2016 (WA). Any changes to COVID-19 testing arrangements will affect these instruments. Omicron The Omicron variant has become the dominant strain of COVID-19 in Australia. Evidence of the intrinsic transmissibility of this variant, disease severity and the effectiveness of current vaccines and treatments against transmission is emerging. Early evidence indicates that Omicron is substantially more transmissible than the Delta variant in populations with a high previous exposure to COVID-19 and/or high vaccination coverage, with most recent estimates demonstrating that the number of cases doubles every 2-3 days [7]. Secondary COVID-19 infection rates in household contacts of Omicron cases in the United Kingdom appear higher than those for Delta (13.6% versus 10.1% respectively) [8] and more transmission occurs to contacts of Omicron than those of Delta cases. Preliminary findings in the United Kingdom also suggest up to a 40-45% reduction in the risk of hospital admissions for Omicron relative to Delta infections [9] and a reduction in emergency department attendance [8]. However, relative to Delta, Omicron infections in the United Kingdom are currently more concentrated in the young adult age group (20-29) and this should be kept in mind in comparison analyses. Even at the reduced hospitalisation rates observed compared to previous variants, the increased transmissibility of Omicron has the potential to put pressure on the health system due to the potential to infect more people leading to high numbers of hospital admissions. Health system capacity will be further impacted by staff being furloughed due to being diagnosed with COVID-19 or being identified as a close contact. TTIQ While TTIQ has been demonstrated to be effective, it is limited by operational factors and the community’s willingness to be tested and comply with public health recommendations. Therefore, the overall contribution of TTIQ to limiting transmission will decrease with higher case numbers. This may lead to a requirement in the future to rely more heavily on other control methods such as indoor mask wearing and strategic use of rapid antigen testing, to control transmission and impacts, particularly in high-risk settings. In the context of community transmission specific strategies will be needed to protect high risk settings and those who work or visit these. This may include expanding the use of rapid antigen testing in settings such as aged care facilities, clear messaging to individuals at higher risk of 7
severe disease to ensure they are fully vaccinated and have accessed a booster dose and ensuring timely access to therapeutics. WA COVID-19 Testing Framework The framework below uses the epidemiological contexts described as “Epidemiological Zones” in the CDNA publication Revised Testing Framework for COVID-19 in Australia (in press). For ease of use these Epidemiological Zones have been renamed phases in the matrix below. There may be more than one Epidemiological Zone or phase occurring at the same time within WA. This will require different, regional approaches to testing in addition to consideration of local vaccination rates. When COVID-19 is introduced into WA, enhanced testing responses to localised outbreaks will be proportionate to local epidemiological factors and may be limited to local areas. The emergence of the Omicron variant as the dominant strain in some jurisdictions has shown a rapid increase in cases compared to previous variants, with testing and health system capacity being reached earlier than modelling projections. In WA a relatively short timeframe (weeks rather than months) should be prepared for before testing or tracing capacity is reached. An additional category may be considered later to represent a new ‘business as usual’ once WA passes the expected wave of cases when border restrictions cease. The CDNA Epidemiological Zones are defined as: Epidemiological Zone 1 No locally acquired cases outside of returned travellers in quarantine. No community transmission. Current WA position as of 26 November 2021 prior to border relaxation. Epidemiological Zone 2 Sporadic cases and clusters, through to wide-spread community transmission, with laboratory testing and public health capacity meeting testing demand. Epidemiological Zone 3 Wide-spread community transmission, with testing demand exceeding laboratory and public health capacity. Please note that the epidemiological zones described above may vary as the epidemiological context in WA evolves. 8
COVID-19 Testing Matrix Phase Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 CDNA Zones Epidemiological Zone 1 (current) Epidemiological Zone 2 Epidemiological Zone 3 No local transmission Clusters and community transmission Widespread transmission exceeding testing and public health capacity Triggers Current conditions Once there is sustained community Rate of transmission exceeds: transmission, manageable within existing i. health system capacity; health services and resources. ii. testing capacity; or iii. the ability to perform detailed contract tracing activities. WA Health System Green: COVID-19 READY Amber: COVID-19 ALERT Red: Widespread Black: SYSTEM Alert Level Disease contained, nil to very limited Disease in community but still contained transmission AT CAPACITY (current definitions) numbers increasing in community Community Service demand Satisfactory vaccination rates and testing transmission of exceeds service capacity COVID-19 no capacity longer contained Symptomatic Testing Symptomatic All to be tested with nose and throat PCR All to be tested with nose and throat PCR RAT as soon as possible. individuals until testing capacity is reached then If negative, repeat RAT in 24 hours. Particularly important to test patients consider rapid antigen test (RAT) for *PCR should be presenting to hospital with pneumonia or diagnostic purposes. Positive RAT should be considered encouraged as the acute respiratory infection [5] confirmed COVID-19 case. appropriate test for symptomatic people. 9
Asymptomatic Testing – Hospitals (Staff) WA Health System Green: COVID-19 READY Amber: COVID-19 ALERT Red: Widespread Black: SYSTEM Alert Level Disease contained, nil to very limited Disease in community but still contained transmission AT CAPACITY (current definitions) numbers increasing in community Community Service demand Satisfactory vaccination rates and testing transmission of exceeds service capacity COVID-19 no capacity longer contained Hospitals (Public and Private sector) staff Voluntary nose and throat PCR test on Voluntary twice weekly RAT with a No testing required. day 5 and 12 after first contact with a minimal interval 72 hours apart Areas within a hospital COVID-19 patient and then every 7 days • Intensive care unit until 14 days pass from last contact. • High dependency If an HCW who has had contact with a Any breach of infection control practices unit positive COVID-19 patient is involved in a or personal protection equipment should • Respiratory wards breach of infection control practices or • Emergency be managed by the health service personal protection equipment, then infection control team departments Public Health advice is sought to decide if • A COVID clinic any additional COVID-19 testing in • Other units at the addition to the above is required. discretion of the hospital operator Hospitals (Public and Private sector) staff Twice weekly RAT with a minimal interval Daily RAT for all staff if feasible – but • Healthcare 72 hours apart consideration may be given to limiting to settings symptomatic staff only. managing very RAT for visitors at each visit high-risk patients (e.g. Note: This regime is subject to transplant ward, consideration of community prevalence haematology and availability of RAT kits. unit, oncology 10
ward, renal dialysis unit) Asymptomatic Testing – Hospitals (Patients/Visitors) WA Health System Green: COVID-19 READY Amber: COVID-19 ALERT Red: Widespread Black: SYSTEM Alert Level Disease contained, nil to very limited Disease in community but still contained transmission AT CAPACITY (current definitions) numbers increasing in community Community Service demand Satisfactory vaccination rates and testing transmission of exceeds service capacity COVID-19 no capacity longer contained Hospitals (Public and Recommend triaging patients presenting If supplies of RAT adequate, test all Private sector) – to emergency departments according to patients presenting to emergency unplanned patient the reasons for attending as per the departments with RAT to assist with presentations EMHS proposed respiratory pathways in patient management. Emergency Departments in WA Health a) Hospital If RAT limited, then emergency Group 1: Confirmed COVID-19 case. No • All patients to be managed as departments further COVID-19 testing required probable COVID Group 2: Suspect COVID-19 infection. • If symptoms consistent with COVID-19 then for RAT i. Patient has clinical and/or epidemiological criteria consistent Positive RAT should be considered with the case definition for confirmed COVID-19 case. COVID-19. • RAT testing on arrival +/- PCR test ii. Patients unable to use PPE effectively e.g. agitated patients, 11
patients with dementia, paediatric patients • RAT testing on arrival iii. Patients unable to provide sufficient information on their symptoms or risk factors for COVID-19 • RAT testing on arrival Group 3: Patient does not have symptoms of, or epidemiological risk factors for, COVID-19 infection. • no RAT or PCR testing needed. RAT and PCR (collected at same time) if a patient will be admitted to hospital Hospitals (Public and N/A Testing 72 hours pre-admission and/or RAT at home on the day of admission (or Private sector) RAT on arrival (vaccinated and on presentation). planned patient unvaccinated). presentations e.g. day procedures and NB: Patients would need to isolate after a multiday admissions pre-admission PCR test until admission Hospitals (Public and N/A RAT on presentation at each visit. This to RAT at home prior to attendance; alert Private sector) – be reviewed with an aim to decrease clinic if positive Patients at risk of severe frequency dependent on patient disease e.g. patients acceptability. undergoing renal dialysis, chemotherapy radiotherapy, transplant patients, immunosuppressed. 12
Hospitals (Public and Consider RAT on presentation at each For Emergency Department Private sector) visit. presentations – manage as above - Paediatric patients aged 5-11 For planned admissions, labour ward, - Maternity patients birth suites – RAT on presentation (Likely low vaccination rates in these cohorts) Aerosol generating RAT on presentation RAT on presentation procedures As defined in Mandatory Policy MP 0133/20 Hospitals (Public and N/A No testing required. No testing required. Private sector) – outpatient attendances – clinics, imaging, pharmacy, pathology etc 13
Domiciliary services N/A No testing required. No testing required. e.g. Hospital in the Home, Silver Chain, Community health nursing Hospitals (Public and N/A Private sector) RAT testing for visitors to high risk RAT for visitors each visit if in a very settings and vulnerable patient cohorts high-risk setting e.g. transplant ward, • carers e.g. oncology wards, ICUs. Hospital haematology unit, oncology ward, renal accompanying ED operator to determine high risk area for dialysis unit etc patients that hospital • visitors of inpatients RAT every third day for long term regular • carers visitors accompanying children Hospitals (Public and N/A No testing required. No testing required. Private sector) Contractors and suppliers Asymptomatic Testing – Non-Hospital health settings WA Health System Alert Green: COVID-19 READY Amber: COVID-19 ALERT Red: Widespread Black: SYSTEM Level Disease contained, nil to very limited Disease in community but still contained transmission AT CAPACITY (current definitions) numbers increasing in community Community Service demand Satisfactory vaccination rates and testing transmission of exceeds service capacity COVID-19 no capacity longer contained 14
Ambulance staff Tested at 48 hours, Day 7 and day 14 Voluntary twice weekly RAT with a No testing required. post contact with a confirmed case. minimal interval 72 hours apart Non-hospital health care setting No testing required. No testing required. • WACHS remote area clinics • WACHS remote nursing posts 15
APPENDIX A: SARS-CoV-2 specific testing, Australia TYPE OF TEST USES Nucleic acid amplification testing Test of choice to detect SARS-CoV-2 during the acute (NAAT) (PCR) illness. Can use pooling of specimens when pre-test probability of infection is low. Pooling not advised when infection rates are high Rapid, low throughput, NAAT To detect SARS-CoV-2 during the acute illness when a (GeneXpert) (PCR) rapid result is required. Limited to one sample at a time Serology Retrospective diagnosis of infection when will influence individual or outbreak management. Not recommended as check of immunity post vaccination Antigen testing (RAT) Most accurate when used for the diagnosis of a SARS- CoV-2 infection in the early stages of symptomatic infection. They are intended for use with nasopharyngeal, throat or nasal swabs Any positive result must be confirmed by NAAT testing Whole genome sequencing WGS is used to compare the genomic relatedness from (WGS) multiple COVID-19 cases to facilitate investigation of clusters by public health units. Used to detect and monitor for Variants of Concern (VoC) Monitoring for strains resistant to antiviral therapies, impact NAAT performance or vaccine effectiveness Virus culture Limited use for diagnosis Wastewater testing Surveillance activities Source: [6] 16
APPENDIX B: Rapid Antigen Testing (RAT) Rapid Antigen Testing (RAT) Established community transmission and maximum utilisation of laboratory PCR testing capacity will lead to wider use of RAT to complement, but not replace, the PCR test as the gold standard test for diagnosis of SARS CoV-2 infection [2]. RAT testing may be considered: 1. In public health investigations where the pre-test probability is high for SARS CoV-2 infection. For example: a. Close contacts of a confirmed case in a closed setting e.g., schools, care homes, workplaces b. Broader contacts in a community for which it may inform isolation and quarantine strategies. In this situation it may need to be repeated regularly c. To rapidly identify an outbreak in a closed setting with several symptomatic individuals [11] d. When community transmission has been established. 2. When the pre-test probability is high, and PCR is unavailable or where an extensive delay in turnaround time for results is anticipated but confirmatory testing by PCR is available. 3. In situations where a false negative result is considered a reasonable risk and has minimal impact on the management of the individual. 4. When RAT is used for screening purposes or as an initial diagnostic tool in high-risk exposure or transmission settings, to maximise the public health benefit, individuals should be screened two to three times a week to mitigate the reduced sensitivity of the test [12]. 5. For screening in certain settings for early detection of outbreaks. Daily testing would be considered to counteract the lower test sensitivity compared to PCR. For example: • Primary schools where children are not yet eligible for vaccination • Health care facilities • Aged care facilities • Food distribution centres • Meat, poultry, porcine processing centres • Construction sites • Mine sites 6. In an outbreak setting, consideration of the potential impacts of false negative results from using RAT and the small proportion of cases that will be missed. 7. The use of RAT should consider the potential impact on resources used to investigate false positive results in the setting of low prevalence. 8. Then use of RAT may need to be revoked in the event of reduced test sensitivity caused by antigenic change in new variants [2]. Page 17 of 22
Advantages of RAT • Can be used at point-of-care • Rapid turnaround time to result (15-30 minutes) • Potential lower cost of PCR if only non-negative RATS are followed by PCR. Rapid antigen tests vary in cost but are usually between $10-$20 per unit. Additional implementation costs, including supervising workforce, personal protective equipment (PPE), waste management and results management need to be considered [3] • Ability to use as a self-test at home • Use for populations far removed from pathology services • With regular testing, enhanced confidence of lower likelihood of being infectious in the community; and • Can supplement laboratory-based PCR capacity [2]. Limitations of RAT • Lower sensitivity and specificity than PCR • Not recommended as a diagnostic tool where accuracy of every test is important to detect cases • PCR testing is preferred in symptomatic persons • Risk of false positives in areas of low prevalence • Labour intensive for supervised screening programs • Not scalable to large numbers of samples • Need for confirmatory PCR test for non-negative RAT results • Failure to undertake confirmatory PCR testing • Notification to Public Health is not automatic • Limited in the ability for genomic testing Page 18 of 22
APPENDIX C: Current Directions for Testing Relevant Directions to COVID-19 testing under the Emergency Management Act 2005 (WA) – subject to change OVERARCHING DIRECTION ▪ Controlled Border for Western Australia Directions (and Amendment Directions) PRESENTATION FOR TESTING DIRECTIONS • Presentation for Testing Directions (No 37) o Premises Approved for the Purposes of Paragraph 17(b)(i) • Presentation for Testing (Airport Workers - Direct International Arrivals) Directions * • Quarantine Driver Directions* • Presentation for Testing (Quarantine Centre Workers) Directions (No 8)* o Authorisation under paragraph 14e and 15(f) • Transport and Accommodation Services (Exposed Maritime Worker) Directions (No 2)* • Exposed On-Board Worker Directions (No 2)* • Maritime Crew Member Directions (No 2)* • Rig or Platform Crew Member Directions (No 2)* • Transport, Freight and Logistics Directions (No 7)* • Flight Crew Directions (No 7)* • Exposure Site (Western Australia) Directions (No 2)* • Exposure Sites (Outside of Western Australia) Directions (No 3) • New South Wales Traveller Quarantine Modification Directions* • Outbreak Outside of Western Australia Response Directions (No 12) * * Refer to applicable CHO approvals made under COVID-19 Testing Directions (PHA) for medical practitioners and persons duly and properly engaged to collect specimens to request a COVID-19 test (due to person presenting as asymptomatic) Relevant Directions to COVID-19 testing under the Public Health Act 2016 (WA) OVERARCHING DIRECTION COVID-19 Testing Direction (No 4) CHO Approvals pursuant to above “Testing Directions” • Chief Health Officer Approval to Conduct COVID-19 Testing People Isolated or Quarantined (No 2) • Chief Health Officer Approval to Conduct COVID-19 PCR Testing at Point of Care in Remote Clinics (No 2) • Chief Health Officer Approval to Conduct COVID-19 Testing Before Proceeding with Organ Donation or Organ Transplantation (No 2) • Chief Health Officer Approval to Request COVID-19 Testing and Authorisation to Inform in relation to COVID-19 Detect Borders Initiative Page 19 of 22
CHO approvals to request COVID-19 Testing on: • Patients who are Required to Provide Evidence of a Negative COVID-19 Test to Meet the Entry Requirements of Overseas Governments (No 3) • Persons who have Been to Locations Visited by Confirmed Cases (No 2) • Persons who are quarantine workers from anywhere in Australia * CHO approvals to request COVID-19 Testing on persons who are presenting for testing under the: • Controlled Border for Western Australia Directions (AS AMENDED) • Presentation for Testing Directions (No 37) • Presentation for Testing (Airport Workers- International Arrivals) Directions (No 4) • Quarantine Driver Directions • Presentation for Testing (Quarantine Centre Workers) Directions (No 8) • Transport and Accommodation Services (Exposed Maritime Worker) Directions (No 2) • Exposed On-Board Worker Directions (No 2) • Maritime Crew Member Directions (No 2) • Rig or Platform Crew Member Directions (No 2) • Transport, Freight and Logistics Directions (No 9) • Flight Crew Directions (No.7) • Exposure Site (Western Australia) Directions (No 2) • Exposure Sites (Outside of Western Australia) Directions (No 2) • New South Wales Traveller Quarantine Modification Directions • Outbreak Outside of Western Australia Response Direction (No 12) Note: Refer to Restatement of Approvals and Authorisations Directions, whereby the schedule of approvals made under prior Testing Direction (No 2) continue to have effect under current amendment (No 3). TESTING REPORTING DIRECTIONS ▪ COVID Testing Reporting Directions (No 2) ▪ Wastewater COVID Testing at WA Laboratories Reporting Directions (No 2) ▪ Wastewater COVID Testing at Laboratories Outside of WA Reporting Directions (No 2) PROHIBITED TESTING DIRECTIONS ▪ Prohibition on the Use of Rapid Antigen Test Directions (No 2) Revocation Directions ▪ Prohibition on the Use of Point of Care Serology Tests Directions (No 2) Page 20 of 22
Works Cited [1] CDNA, “Considerations for COVID-19 Test, Trace, Isolate and Quarantine (TTIQ) in transition phases of the National Plan (Draft),” Communicable Diseases Network Australia, Canberra, 2021a. [2] CDNA&PHLN, “Joint Statement on SARS-CoV-S version 201,” XX November 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.health.gov.au/resources. [3] DHHS, “Guidance for the provision of rapid antigen testing for COVID-19 screening in non-clinical settings,” 05 October 2021a. [Online]. Available: https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/202110/Guidance-for-the-provision-of- RAT_1.pdf. [4] DHHS, “Surveillance testing industry list and requirements.,” 11 November 2021b. [Online]. Available: https://www.health.vic.gov.au/covid-19/surveillance-testing-industry-list-covid-19. [5] CDNA, “Revised Testing Framework for COVID-19 in Australia (draft),” XX November 2021b. [Online]. Available: https://www.health.wa.gov.au/resources. [6] Public Health Laboratory Network, “PHLN guidance on laboratory testing for SARS-CoV-2 version 2.1,” 29 October 2021. [Online]. Available: https:www.health.gov.au/resources. [7] Australian Health Protection Principal Committee, “AHPPC statement on the Omicron public healht implications and response options,” 22 December 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.health.gov.au/news/ahppc-statement-on-the-omicron-public-health-implications-and- response-options. [8] UK Health Security Agency, “SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England,” 23 December 2021. [Online]. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk. [9] Ferguson N.,et al “Report 50: Hospitalisation risk for Omicron cases England,” 22 December 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/mrc-gida/2021-12-22- COVID19-Report-50.pdf. [10] NSW Education, “Response protocols for COVID-19 cases,” 27 November 2021. [Online]. Available: https://education.nsw.gov.au/covid-19/response-protocol. [11] NSW Health, “Living Evidence - rapid testing (policy),” 22 November 2021b. [Online]. Available: https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/covid-19/critical-intelligence-unit/living-evidence-rapid-testing. [12] NSW Health, “Framework for the Provision of Rapid Antigen Screening for COVID-19 in Clinical and Non-Clinical Settings,” 23 August 2021a. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021- 08/Framework%20and%20Standard%20Operating%20Procedure%20-%2022%20August.pdf. [13] CDNA, “Australian National Disease Surveillence Plan for COVID-19,” 21 April 2021c. [Online]. Available: https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/australian-national-disease-surveillance- plan-for-covid-19. Page 21 of 22
Last updated 10 January 2022 – V3.0 SHICC PHAB This document can be made available in alternative formats on request for a person with disability. © Department of Health 2022 Copyright to this material is vested in the State of Western Australia unless otherwise indicated. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review, as permitted under the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced or re-used for any purposes whatsoever without written permission of the State of Western Australia Page 22 of 22
You can also read