Using Responsible Research Metrics to prepare for REF 2021 - Dr Evangelia Lipitakis
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Using Responsible Research Metrics to prepare for REF 2021 Dr Evangelia Lipitakis Research Evaluation Specialist 9th October 2019
Agenda 1 Provision of citation data to REF 2O21 2 Citation data and background to contextualization 3 Use cases 2
What is Clarivate 1. Matching API service providing to the REF? • Link submitted outputs to our citation data • Incorporated into the REF submission system 2. Contextual data • Support panels in their evaluation • https://www.ref.ac.uk/guidance/citation-and-contextual-data- guidance/ 3. Matching support services • Assist HEIs to match outputs to Web of Science 4. Interpretative support •Support and training about the responsible use and potential pitfalls of citation data 3
Citation data • Panels only using citation data to inform their assessment of the and preparing significance of outputs as part of their peer review of the for the REF ‘originality, significance and rigour’. • Cautious use of citations for evaluating recent publications. • We will not be providing citation data for the most recent year. • Bibliometric methods do not make a value judgement on why a given paper is cited which could make reliance on them at the paper-level somewhat misleading. • Andrew Wakefield’s original paper on a link between MMR and autism has been cited 1,248 times, putting it among the most highly-cited papers. • Clarivate Analytics and the REF team are committed to responsible use of metrics. • Working with the UK Forum for Responsible Research Metrics, who are also represented on the REF Panel User Group for metrics. 4
Database coverage Data we provide to the REF will be derived from the Web of Science Core Collection: • Science Citation Index – Expanded. • Social Sciences Citation Index. • Arts and Humanities Citation Index. • Emerging Sources Citation Index. • Conference Proceedings Citation Index. Citation counts will be consistent with those provided in out Web of Science product based on the Core Collection. 5
Why do citation Because citations credit the intellectual contribution of earlier counts require research, the number of citations a paper receives reflects the contextualisation? impact it has had on the field to which it relates. But citation counts are also affected by: • The field of research. 6
Background to contextualising Citation rates and behaviours vary by field: citation data Field 60 Note: Chart shows citations recieved by global papers to 31 Jan 2019 Biology & biochemistry 50 Citations per paper 40 Clincial medicine 30 Economics & business 20 Materials science 10 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 1999 2000 2001 7
Why do citation Because citations credit the intellectual contribution of earlier counts require research, the number of citations a paper receives reflects the contextualisation? impact it has had on the field to which it relates. But citation counts are also affected by: • The field of research. • The age of the paper (i.e. the publication year). 8
Background to contextualising Older papers are more likely to be cited and have had more time citation data to accumulate citations: Publication year 40 100 Percentage documents cited 30 75 Citations per paper 20 50 10 25 0 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Note: Chart shows citations recieved by UK papers to 31 Jan 2019 9
Why do citation Because citations credit the intellectual contribution of earlier counts require research, the number of citations a paper receives reflects the contextualisation? impact it has had on the field to which it relates. But citation counts are also affected by: • The field of research. • The age of the paper (i.e. the publication year). • The type of document (e.g. article, review, proceedings paper, book). 10
Background to contextualising Reviews and articles tend to receive more citations citation data than other document types: Document type 12 Note: Chart shows citations recieved by global papers published in 2017 10 Citations per paper 8 6 4 2 0 Books Articles Reviews Proceedings papers Chemistry Physics Economics and business 11
What is Clarivate Contextual data has been agreed and published on the providing to the REF website: REF? https://www.ref.ac.uk/guidance/citation-and-contextual-data-guidance/ Contextual data • Global mean number of citations per publication. • Number of citations equating to different thresholds of excellence: • The world’s top 1%, 5%, 10%, 25% and 50% of most highly cited papers. • We will provide the data to the REF team as a spreadsheet. • Additional look-up function. Three snapshots during the project: • Start of the pilot phase (autumn 2019) • Start of the submission phase (January 2020) • For the evaluation phase (November 2020) 12
Monitor data in Web of Science https://www.ref.ac.uk/guidance/citation-and-contextual-data-guidance/
Monitor article level indicators in InCites B&A https://www.ref.ac.uk/guidance/citation-and-contextual-data-guidance/
How citation counts can be contextualized? Normalization of citation counts per year, document type and research area Category expected citations Category Normalized Citation Impact Percentile in Subject Area position average number of citations for the ratio of actual times cited to category out of 100% in the citation distribution same document type published in expected citations for the same document type, the same year in the category publication year, and subject category ü 19 citations mean an impact 4.9 times higher than the category’s ü Out of 100%, this paper is expected impact positioned well in the top 3% 15
Output classification by The REF 2021 UoA Research Schema is mapped on the The context of REF 2021 research schema Journal Subject Categories and is available in InCites B&A. This is a proxy mapping based on the scope notes associated with our categories (not HESA cost centres mapping). The Journal Subject Categories are the 254 Web of Science Subject Categories 16
1 How to create and upload a dataset for papers which have been identified as potential submissions Use cases 2 How to inform submission selection using normalised indicators and contextual data 3 How to download article level metrics and calculate percentile thresholds 4 How to collect REF compliant outputs in InCites using filters (Timespan, Document Type, OA, Research Schemas) 5 How to Benchmark against other UK/international universities in the context of REF 2021 (or other schemas) 17
Creating a dataset - Organizational Level Organizational level and refining with filters 18
Creating a dataset – Custom dataset Upload a File of Identifiers (WoS Accession Number, DOI, PubMedID) A custom dataset can be created from a list of document identifiers that you compile. There are three valid identifiers: •Web of Science Core Collection accession number. Example: WOS:000388713500004 •DOI. Example: 10.1088/1478-3975/13/6/066006 •MEDLINE ID (PubMed ID). Example: MEDLINE:24843332 The format of the file you upload must be *.csv or *.txt. Upload up to 50 k records per file, in minutes. 19
Creating a dataset – My Organization’s Faculties, Departments, Schools Researcher, team & departmental research analytics reporting using bibliometric data – based on your own data 20
Drill down to contextual metrics to verify identified outputs from any dataset. For every level of aggregation of your datasets, you can get the contextualized article level metrics
Access the article level contextual indicators in the research schema of your choice Get the full list of article level metrics with contextualized indicators for the research area of your choice 22
Create customized percentiles thresholds: 1%, 5%, 10%, 25%, 50% Identify the publications per percentile threshold Download the csv file with article level indicators. Sort the dataset for Percentile in Biochemistry & Subject area (smaller to larger). Molecular Biology Identify the % of articles within articles in the top 1% 1%, 5%, 10%, 25% and 50% thresholds. 23
Benchmark with other UK/International institutions SWOT Analysis of Russell Group’s 2013-2018 articles in Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 24
Understand the contribution of multi-authored papers to impact Use threshold filters which permit the inclusion or exclusion of multi-authored papers and limit output to comparable sizes Web of Science Documents: Threshold filter which you can limit output to a minimum or maximum number of publications. (i.e. use a minimum # of papers and then rank your results by Category Normalized Citation Impact indicators to exclude smaller datasets that might skew results Authors per Documents: Threshold filter which permits the inclusion or exclusion of multi-authored papers (i.e. see the papers which only have between 1 and 9 authors) 25
Verify open access output with contextualized metrics Institutional evaluation of OA policy Open Access status is available across the Web of Science platform already as a result of a partnership with Impact Story, a not-for-profit organization that recently launched a knowledge base of Open Access (OA) content. This knowledge base makes it possible to discover and link to legal Gold or Bronze (free content at a publisher's website) and Green (e.g., author self-archived in a repository) OA versions. Learn more about Open Access versioning in Web of Science 26
Identify Open Access trends and impact of output Verify Gold Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) output with contextualized metrics 27
Thank you Questions? Dr Evangelia Lipitakis Research Evaluation Specialist Evangelia.lipitakis@clarivate.com https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/ref2021/ Web of Science Group retains all intellectual property rights in, and asserts rights of confidentiality over, all parts of its response submitted within this presentation. By submitting this response we authorise you to make and distribute such copies of our proposal within your organisation and to any party contracted directly to solely assist in the evaluation process of our presentation on a confidential basis. Any further use will be strictly subject to agreeing appropriate terms.
You can also read