Towards Ecological Stewardship Based on Ecosystem Natural Capital Accounts - Nimbu
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Thematic cluster on Geospatial Data Thursday 29 November 2018 Towards Ecological Stewardship Based on Ecosystem Natural Capital Accounts Jean-Louis Weber International Consultant Former Special Adviser on Economic-Environmental Accounting to the European Environment Agency
Ecosystem Accounting in the International Statistical Context The System of Environmental-Economic Accounts “Central Framework” (SEEA-CF) adopted World Bank/ by the UN Statistical Commission in 2012 as an international statistical standard on par with WAVES the System of National Accounts (SNA 2008) has been supplemented in 2013 by a volume Applications on “Experimental Ecosystem Accounting” (SEEA-EEA). While the SEEA-CF is recommended for implementation, the SEEA-EEA which is a conceptual framework is now tested in various AEE: SEEA/ECA projects. Ecosystem Capital The CBD TS77 Ecosystem Natural Capital – Quick Start package (ENCA-QSP) is a contribution Accounts to the implementation of the SEEA. SEEA volume 2 SEEA volume 1 “Experimental Ecosystem SNA SEEA-EEA/ENCA “Central Framework” Accounting” Mauritius USE UN CBD: SEEA/ENCA-QSP DEGRADATION J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
ENCA-QSP: A Quick Start Package to support the experimentation of the SEEA-Experimental Ecosystem Accounts • A response to the requirement of the CBD Aichi Target 2 call for incorporating, as appropriate and by 2020 at the latest, biodiversity values into national accounting. • A Quick Start Package • A technical accounting framework for measuring ecosystem sustainable capacity, resilience and economic sectors’ accountability to the ecosystem. • It includes a full set of tables and guidance for compilation. • A “distribution” (in the sense used for open source software) of the SEEA-EEA, aimed at putting it to work • Supported by a tutorial for technical training of experts (Kangaré) http://www.ecosystemaccounting.net/ J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
Accounting for What? To Measure Ecosystem Capital Degradation (or Recovery) Ecosystem degradation impacts and associated socio-economic issues • Biodiversity loss • Economy’s liability to its impacts • Desertification on ecosystems • Accounting for ecosystem capital • Food security depreciation and related monetary • Water regulation costs (Restoration, Avoidance, • Climate change and adaptation Offset…) • Exposure to natural risks • Ecological debts and related financial risks • Sustainability of ecosystem • Health (clean water, clean urban services air…) • … • Sustainability of economic growth Ecosystem capital degradation = Loss of ecosystem capability to supply services and sustain life on Earth = Loss of intrinsic ecological value J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
Value is not just about money… …however maintaining the intrinsic value of a priceless asset may have a cost but this asset is invaluable = it has no monetary value… Paid costs of maintenance and restoration Cultural services, Estimated cost of may not (yet) paid repairs generate = income… asset depreciation J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
What to Account For? ENCA Measures Ecosystems Intrinsic Value Ecosystem Public Good: Ecosystem Functions Metrics (regulation of climate and = Ecosystem water, healthy air, Intrinsic Value Capability biodiversity… and Units sustainability of services) Appropriated Metrics Resource: = Utilitarian Value Economic Money Natural Assets J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
How to Count? In Ecosystem Capability Units (ECU) • SEEA-EEA: integration of services and assets in monetary units. It measures utilitarian value. • ENCA-QSP : integration of ecosystem capital with a composite index called Ecosystem Capability Unit (ECU). ECU is a currency to measure intrinsic value. Total Ecosystem Capability, Degradation or Enhancement (measured in ECU currency) Resilience / Health Resilience / Health Resilience / Health Composite Index Index Index Index Indexes = Sustainable Use Sustainable Use Sustainable Use Index Index Index ECU Ecosystem Addition is Carbone Balance Water Balance Infrastructure/ limited or (tonnes, joules…) (m3) Biodiversity Balance impossible (weighted ha or km) J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
Overview of CBD-ENCA-QSP Economic valuation (in $) of unpaid Economic valuation (in $) of costs of restoration and offset ecosystem services values [today not recorded in the (e.g. SEEA-EEA, TEEB, models…) SNA and companies’ accounts] Ecological Balance-Sheet of sectors and companies (in ECU): Ecosystem Physical Assets, Receivables and Debts Total Ecosystem Capability, Assessment of important Degradation or Enhancement services in (in Ecosystem Capability Units, ECU) physical terms Resilience / Health Resilience / Health Resilience / Health (e.g. MAES) Index Index Index Sustainable Use Sustainable Use Sustainable Use Index Index Index Ecosystem Carbone Balance Water Balance Infrastructure/ (tonnes, joules…) (m3) Biodiversity Balance (weighted ha or km) Land cover account (ha) + Hydrographical network J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
Ecosystem Natural Capital Accounts are Deep-rooted in Geospatial information Economy Total Ecosystem Capital Capability in ECU, Stocks and Change Enhancement Balance sheet in ECU of physical assets, Unpaid costs: Stocks ecological debts Ecosystem Capital Degradation and receivables Consumption (National accounts) or Depreciation Stocks (Financial Accounts) 1990 Restoration Final Demand at costs Full Price Change Ecological 1990- sustainability of 2006 Value Added Sustainability supported by coefficients ecosystem services Landscape Ecological Potential change 1990-2006, by ecosystem landscape units J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
Examples of land and ecosystem natural capital accounts Diachronic analysis and land cover account in Burkina Faso Gabriel JAFFRAIN (IGNFI) Oumar Issa SANNON (IGB) © BDOT - Burkina Faso – EIONET meeting Copenhague 30-31st January 2006 Land cover account for Europe: Burkina Faso / IGB & IGNFI, 2009, LEAC/BDOT Urban Sprawl 1990-2000 (in red) Land over account 1992-2002 Total Ecosystem Capital Capability and Change in Mauritius (Provisional results) Total Ecosystem Capital Capability (inland): Total Ecosystem Capital Capability (inland): ECU value by Socio-Ecological Landscape Change in ECU value, % by Socio-Ecological Units, 2010 Landscape Units, 2000-2010 Net Landscape Gains and Losses in Change in Small Rivers Ecological Potential NLEP 1990-2012 Ecological Condition (NLEP) 2012 2009-2015 (%) Ecosystem Natural Capital Accounts of the Rhône River Basin Preliminary results Source: UNCEEA meeting 2014 Experimental ENCA, https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/ceea/meetings Mauritius Case Study (IOC, 2014) (Arguello J., Weber J.-L., Parmentier H. and Negrutiu I., 2018, ENS Lyon, France) /ninth_meeting/UNCEEA-9-8e.pdf Pilot ENCA for Mauritius: ENCA for the Rhone River Catchment : NLEP (left), Change in Total Ecosystem Capability (in ECU) (left) NLEP 1900-2012 (middle) and Change in Small Rivers Ecological and Change 2000-2010 (right) Condition 2009-2015 (right) J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
Examples Land of land and ecosystem natural capital accounts Total Ecosystem Capital Capability and Change in Mauritiusareas and Ecosystem Accounts in Europe: Sprawl of artificial 1990-2000 (Provisional results) Total Ecosystem Capital Capability (inland): Total Ecosystem Capital Capability (inland): ECU value by Socio-Ecological Landscape Change in ECU value, % by Socio-Ecological Units, 2010 Diachronic analysis and land Landscape Units, 2000-2010 cover account in Burkina Faso Gabriel JAFFRAIN (IGNFI) Oumar Issa SANNON (IGB) Diachronic analysis and land Land cover account for Europe: © BDOT - Burkina Faso – EIONET meeting Copenhague 30-31st January 2006 Burkina Faso / IGB & IGNFI, 2009, LEAC/BDOT cover account in Burkina Faso Urban Sprawl 1990-2000 (in red) Land over account 1992-2002 Total Ecosystem Capital Capability and Change in Mauritius (Provisional results) Total Ecosystem Capital Capability (inland): Total Ecosystem Capital Capability (inland): Net Landscape Gains and Losses in Change in Small Rivers ECU value by Socio-Ecological Landscape Change in ECU value, % by Socio-Ecological Units, 2010 Landscape Units, 2000-2010 Ecological Potential NLEP 1990-2012 Ecological Condition (NLEP) 2012 2009-2015 (%) Net Landscape Gains and Losses in Change in Small Rivers Ecological Potential NLEP 1990-2012 Ecological Condition (NLEP) 2012 2009-2015 (%) Ecosystem Natural Capital Accounts of the Rhône Gabriel JAFFRAINRiver (IGNFI) Basin Oumar Issa SANNON (IGB) Ecosystem Natural Capital Accounts of the Rhône River Basin Preliminary results Preliminary results Source: UNCEEA meeting 2014 Experimental ENCA, (Arguello J., Weber J.-L., Parmentier H. and Negrutiu I., 2018, ENS Lyon, France) Source: UNCEEA meeting 2014 https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/ceea/meetings Mauritius Case Study (IOC, 2014) /ninth_meeting/UNCEEA-9-8e.pdf Experimental ENCA, (Arguello Source: J.,PilotWeber J.-L., ENCAAgency European Environment 2006 Parmentier H. andNLEP https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/ceea/meetings for Mauritius: Negrutiu ENCA I., 2018, for the Rhone ENS River Catchment : Lyon, NLEPCase Mauritius France) (left), Change Study (IOC,in2014) 1900-2012 (middle) and Change in Small Rivers Ecological Total Ecosystem Capability (in ECU) (left) /ninth_meeting/UNCEEA-9-8e.pdf ©and BDOT - Burkina Change EIONET meeting Copenhague 30-31st January 2006 Condition 2009-2015 (right) Faso –(right) 2000-2010 J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
The ENCA-QSP Data Model: Assimilation & Integration of Statistics and Geo-Data Data QA/QC, Data assimilation Accounts integration, Data input analysis & (e.g. within analysis & reporting at Socio-economic processing 1 ha or 1 km2 grids) various scales data and statistics Disaggregate & (by regions) map Data extraction Classify, Satellite images aggregate & map Generalised monitoring Analyse & data process Data from monitoting stations, samples Extrapolate Overlay & Hotspots integrate Administrative Statistical & Extract, cross- divisions, geographical check Socio-ecological management reference datasets codification units, river areas… catchments or risk perimeters… J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
The ECU Metrics and Policy Measures Policies to Halt or Mitigate Policies to Support Ecosystem Ecosystem Degradation Conservation & Enhancement Traditional policies Traditional policies • Regulations, command & control • Public investments (conditionality) • Fiscal policy, taxes, PPP • Public procurements (conditionality) • Public procurements (conditionality) • Subsidies to programmes (conservation, Novel or emerging policies involving actors reforestation, organic agriculture, water • Recording ecosystem degradation and treatment…) depreciation [& ecological debts] Novel or emerging policies • Green finance (conditionality) • Recording ecological receivables for • Rating sovereign and private financial nature conservation and restoration risks • Green finance (conditionality) • Integration of Environmental, Social and • Nature offset payments and banking Governances (ESG) risks factors (OECD) • Private-Public Partnerships • Full price of commodities • Nature offset payments & banking • Private-Public Partnerships J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
ENCA at the Global Scale: the 3 Rio Conventions and SDGs Need of ecosystem natural capital accounts for better coordination of the 3 Rio Conventions on Climate Change, Desertification and Biological Diversity J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
ENCA at the Global Scale: the 3 Rio Conventions and SDGs Need of ecosystem natural capital accounts for better coordination of the 3 Rio Conventions on Climate Change, Desertification and Biological Diversity SD G 6 SD G 2 W a ter 6 .3 r e so u r c e Need of ecosystem natural capital accounts for the SDGs Fo o d se c u r i t y 6 .4 e c o syst e m s – Accounting is mentioned in targets 15.9 and 17.19 SD G 1 5 SD G 1 3 SD G 1 4 SD G 1 7 La n d Clim a te M a rin e 1 7 .1 9 e c o sy st e m s a d a p t a t i o n , e c o sy st e m s 1 5 .9 : su p p le m e n t d i sa st e r s a ccou n tin g GD P … J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
ENCA at the Global Scale: the 3 Rio Conventions and SDGs Need of ecosystem natural capital accounts for better coordination of the 3 Rio Conventions on Climate Change, Desertification and Biological Diversity Need of ecosystem natural capital accounts for the SDGs – Accounting is mentioned in targets 15.9 and 17.19 Possibility of a Global ENCA by 2020 – First step, quick start using the best accessible datasets – Mapping & accounting physical ecosystem degradation or enhancement – A dream? Presentation at the CBD COP 15, in November 2020 in Beijing? ? J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
Thank You ! Jean-Louis WEBER jlweber45@gmail.com http://www.ecosystemaccounting.net/ J.-L. Weber, 29 Nov. 2018
You can also read