THE GLOBAL RISKS REPORT 2020 - INSIGHT REPORT 15TH EDITION IN PARTNERSHIP WITH MARSH & MCLENNAN AND ZURICH INSURANCE GROUP
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The Global Risks Report 2020 Insight Report 15th Edition In partnership with Marsh & McLennan and Zurich Insurance Group
Executive Summary The world cannot wait for the fog of increasing the risk of economic stagnation. geopolitical and geo-economic uncertainty Low trade barriers, fiscal prudence and to lift. Opting to ride out the current period strong global investment—once seen as in the hope that the global system will fundamentals for economic growth—are “snap back” runs the risk of missing crucial fraying as leaders advance nationalist windows to address pressing challenges. policies. The margins for monetary and On key issues such as the economy, the fiscal stimuli are also narrower than environment, technology and public health, before the 2008–2009 financial crisis, stakeholders must find ways to act quickly creating uncertainty about how well and with purpose within an unsettled global countercyclical policies will work. A landscape. This is the context in which the challenging economic climate may World Economic Forum publishes the 15th persist this year: according to the Global edition of the Global Risks Report. Risks Perception Survey, members of the multistakeholder community see “economic confrontations” and “domestic political An unsettled world polarization” as the top risks in 2020. Powerful economic, demographic and Amid this darkening economic outlook, technological forces are shaping a new citizens’ discontent has hardened with balance of power. The result is an unsettled systems that have failed to promote geopolitical landscape—one in which advancement. Disapproval of how states are increasingly viewing opportunities governments are addressing profound and challenges through unilateral lenses. economic and social issues has sparked What were once givens regarding alliance protests throughout the world, potentially structures and multilateral systems no weakening the ability of governments to longer hold as states question the value take decisive action should a downturn of long-standing frameworks, adopt occur. Without economic and social more nationalist postures in pursuit stability, countries could lack the financial of individual agendas and weigh the resources, fiscal margin, political capital potential geopolitical consequences of or social support needed to confront key economic decoupling. global risks. Beyond the risk of conflict, if stakeholders concentrate on immediate geostrategic Climate threats and advantage and fail to reimagine or adapt accelerated biodiversity loss mechanisms for coordination during this unsettled period, opportunities for action Climate change is striking harder and on key priorities may slip away. more rapidly than many expected. The last five years are on track to be the warmest on record, natural disasters are Risks to economic stability becoming more intense and more frequent, and social cohesion and last year witnessed unprecedented extreme weather throughout the world. Recent editions of the Global Risks Report Alarmingly, global temperatures are on warned of downward pressure on the track to increase by at least 3°C towards global economy from macroeconomic the end of the century—twice what climate fragilities and financial inequality. These experts have warned is the limit to avoid pressures continued to intensify in 2019, the most severe economic, social and 6 Executive Summary
environmental consequences. The near- technology governance framework and term impacts of climate change add up to cyber insecurity all pose significant risk. a planetary emergency that will include loss Geopolitical and geo-economic uncertainty— of life, social and geopolitical tensions and including the possibility of fragmented negative economic impacts. cyberspace—also threaten to prevent the full potential of next generation technologies For the first time in the history of the Global from being realized. Respondents to our Risks Perception Survey, environmental survey rated “information infrastructure concerns dominate the top long-term breakdown” as the sixth most impactful risk risks by likelihood among members of the in the years until 2030. World Economic Forum’s multistakeholder community; three of the top five risks by impact are also environmental (see Figure I, Health systems under The Evolving Risks Landscape 2007–2020). new pressures “Failure of climate change mitigation and adaption” is the number one risk by impact Health systems around the world are at and number two by likelihood over the next risk of becoming unfit for purpose. New 10 years, according to our survey. Members vulnerabilities resulting from changing of the Global Shapers Community—the societal, environmental, demographic and Forum’s younger constituents—show technological patterns threaten to undo the even more concern, ranking environmental dramatic gains in wellness and prosperity issues as the top risks in both the short that health systems have supported over the and long terms. last century. Non-communicable diseases— such as cardiovascular diseases and mental The Forum’s multistakeholder network illness—have replaced infectious diseases as rate “biodiversity loss” as the second most the leading cause of death, while increases impactful and third most likely risk for the in longevity and the economic and societal next decade. The current rate of extinction costs of managing chronic diseases have is tens to hundreds of times higher than the put healthcare systems in many countries average over the past 10 million years—and under stress. Progress against pandemics is it is accelerating. Biodiversity loss has critical also being undermined by vaccine hesitancy implications for humanity, from the collapse and drug resistance, making it increasingly of food and health systems to the disruption difficult to land the final blow against some of entire supply chains. of humanity’s biggest killers. As existing health risks resurge and new ones emerge, humanity’s past successes in overcoming Consequences of health challenges are no guarantee of digital fragmentation future results. More than 50% of the world’s population is now online, approximately one million people go online for their first time each day, and There is still scope for stakeholders to two-thirds of the global population own a address these risks, but the window mobile device. While digital technology is of opportunity is closing. Coordinated, bringing tremendous economic and multistakeholder action is needed quickly societal benefits to much of the global to mitigate against the worst outcomes population, issues such as unequal and build resiliency across communities access to the internet, the lack of a global and businesses. The Global Risks Report 2020 7
Figure I: The Evolving Risks Landscape, 2007–2020 Top 5 Global Risks in Terms of Likelihood 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Infrastructure Blow up in Asset price Asset price Storms and Income disparity Income disparity Income Interstate Involuntary Extreme Extreme Extreme Extreme breakdown asset prices collapse collapse cyclones disparity conflict migration weather weather weather weather 1st Chronic Middle East China economic China economic Flooding Fiscal Fiscal Extreme Extreme Extreme Involuntary Natural Climate action Climate action diseases instability slowdown slowdown imbalances imbalances weather weather weather migration disasters failure failure 2nd Oil price shock Failed and Chronic Chronic Corruption Greenhouse gas Greenhouse Unemployment Failure of Climate action Natural Cyberattacks Natural Natural 3rd failing states diseases disease emissions gas emissions national failure disasters disasters disasters governance China hard Oil price shock Global Fiscal crises Biodiversity loss Cyberattacks Water crises Climate action State collapse Interstate Terrorist Data fraud Data fraud Biodiversity loss 4th landing governance failure or crisis conflict attacks or theft or theft gaps Blow up in Chronic Deglobalization Global Climate change Water crises Population Cyberattacks Unemployment Natural Data fraud Climate action Cyberattacks Human-made asset prices diseases (emerging) governance ageing catastrophes or theft failure environmental 5th gaps disasters Top 5 Global Risks in Terms of Impact 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Blow up in Blow up in Asset price Asset price Fiscal crises Financial failure Financial failure Fiscal crises Water crises Climate action Weapons of Weapons of Weapons of Climate action asset prices asset prices collapse collapse failure mass mass mass failure 1st destruction destruction destruction Deglobalization Deglobalization Deglobalization Deglobalization Climate change Water crises Water crises Climate action Infectious Weapons of Extreme Extreme Climate action Weapons of (developed) (developed) (developed) failure diseases mass weather weather failure mass 2nd destruction destruction Interstate China hard Oil and gas Oil price spikes Geopolitical Food crises Fiscal Water crises Weapons of Water crises Water crises Natural Extreme Biodiversity loss 3rd and civil wars landing price spike conflict imbalances mass disasters weather destruction Pandemics Oil price shock Chronic Chronic Asset price Fiscal Weapons of Unemployment Interstate Involuntary Natural Climate action Water crises Extreme diseases disease collapse imbalances mass conflict migration disasters failure weather 4th destruction Oil price shock Pandemics Fiscal crises Fiscal crises Energy Energy Climate action Infrastructure Climate action Energy price Climate action Water crises Natural Water crises price volatility price volatility failure breakdown failure shock failure disasters 5th Economic Environmental Geopolitical Societal Technological Source: World Economic Forum 2007-2020, Global Risks Reports. Note: Global risks may not be strictly comparable across years, as definitions and the set of global risks have evolved with new issues emerging on the 10-year horizon. For example, cyberattacks, income disparity and unemployment entered the set of global risks in 2012. Some global risks have been reclassified: water crises and income disparity were recategorized as societal risks in the 2015 and 2014 Global Risks Reports, respectively.
The Global Risks Landscape 2020 Figure II: The Global Risks Landscape 2020 4.0 Climate Climate aaction ction failure failure Weapons W eapons ooff m mass ass destruction destruction Biodiversity lloss Biodiversity oss Extreme weather Extreme weather Water c Water crises rises Information Information Natural disasters Natural disasters iinfrastructure nfrastructure Cyberattacks Cyberattacks breakdown b reakdown Infectious d Infectious diseases iseases Human-made H uman-made environmental disasters environmental d isaster Interstate Interstate Global G governance lobal g overnance conflict confl fliict failure failure Food c Food crises rises 3.5 Financial Financial ffailure a i l u re 3.47 average Fiscal Fiscal crises crises Involuntary migration Involuntary m igration 2.5 Data fraud Data orr ttheft fraud o heft Unemployment U n e mp l o yme n t Asset bubbles Asset bubble Social Social instability instability Critical Critical infrastructure infrastructure National N ational ffailure a i l u re governance governance failure failure State ccollapse State ollapse Terrorist Terrorist attacks attacks Adverse Adverse technological technological advances advances Energy Energy price price shock sh o ck Unmanageable inflation Unmanageable infl flaation 3.0 Failure of urban planning Impact Deflation Illicit Illicit ttrade ra d e 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 3.31 plotted average area Likelihood 5.0 Top 10 risks in terms of Top 10 risks in terms of 1.0 5.0 Likelihood Impact 1 Extreme weather 1 Climate action failure Categories 2 Climate action failure 2 Weapons of mass destruction Economic 3 Natural disasters 3 Biodiversity loss 4 Biodiversity loss 4 Extreme weather Environmental 5 Human-made environmental disasters 5 Water crises 6 Data fraud or theft 6 Information infrastructure breakdown Geopolitical 7 Cyberattacks 7 Natural disasters 8 Water crises 8 Cyberattacks Societal 9 Global governance failure 9 Human-made environmental disasters Technological 10 Asset bubbles 10 Infectious diseases Source: World Economic Forum Global Risks Note: Survey respondents were asked to assess the likelihood of the individual global risk on a scale of Note: Survey respondents were asked to assess the likelihood of the individual global risk on a scale of 1 to 5, 1 Source: World Perception Survey Economic 2019–2020.Forum Global Risks 1representing to 5, 1 representing a risk that is very unlikely to happen and 5 a risk that is very likely to occur. They a risk that is very unlikely to happen and 5 a risk that is very likely to occur. They also assess the impact Perception Survey 2019–2020. also assessed on each theonimpact global risk a scale of each of 1 global to 5 (1: riskimpact, minimal on a scale ofimpact, 2: minor 1 to 5,3:1moderate representing impact,a 4: minimal impactand severe impact and 5 a catastrophic 5: catastrophicimpact. impact). ToSeeensure Appendixlegibility, thedetails. B for more names To of the legibility, ensure global risks are abbreviated; the names seeare of the global risks Appendix A for abbreviated; the full nameseeand Appendix A for the full name and description. description.
The Global Shapers Risks Landscape 2020 Figure III: The Global Shapers Risk Landscape 2020 Economic Environmental Climate Biodiversity action failure loss Extreme Human-made weather environmental disasters Natural disasters 4.0 4.0 Critical 4. Unemployment Financial infra- failure structure failure Fiscal crises Unmanageable inflation Asset bubbles 3.5 Energy price shock 3.5 Deflation Illicit trade 3.0 3.0 Impact 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Likelihood Geopolitical Societal Water crises Weapons of mass destruction Food 3. crises Infectious diseases 4.0 Interstate 4.0 conflict Terrorist State attacks collapse Global governance failure Involuntary migration National Failure of governance urban planning failure 3.5 3.5 Social instability 3.0 3.0 Impact 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Likelihood Technological Respondents 3. Cyberattacks Multistakeholder Shapers 4.0 Information infrastructure breakdown Data fraud or theft The Global The Global Shapers Shapers Community Communityisisthe theWorld World Economic Forum’s network Economic Forum’s networkof ofyoung youngpeople people 3.5 driving dialogue, action driving dialogue, actionand andchange. change. Adverse technological advances Source: World Economic Forum Global Risks Perception Survey 2019–2020. Note: We applied the same completion thresholds to survey responses from the Global Shapers as to the multi-stakeholder sample (see Appendix B: Global Risks 3.0 Note: We applied the same completion thresholds to survey responses from the Impact Perception Survey and Methodology). Global Shapers as to the multistakeholder sample (see Appendix B: Global Risks Perception Survey We received 236 and Methodology). responses for Part 1 “The World in 2020” and 190 for Part 2 “Assessment of Global Risks”. The data for Part 3 “Global Risk Interconnections” was received We not used. 236 responses for Part 1 “The World in 2020” and 190 for Part 2 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 “Assessment of Global Risks”. The data for Part 3 “Global Risk Interconnections” Likelihood were not used.
Figure IV: The Global Risks Interconnections Map 2020 The Global Risks Interconnections Map 2020 Natural d Natural disasters isasters .0 E Extreme xtreme w weather eather Human-made H uman-made environmental disaster environmental disasters Infectious diseases Infectious diseases Food c Food crises rises B Biodiversity iodiversity lloss oss F Failure ailure o off u urban rban planning planning G lobal Global ggovernance overnance Weapons Weapons of d of mass mass destruction estruction ffailure ailure Water c Water crises rises Climate C limate action action failure failure Critical Critical infrastructure infrastructure .5 failure failure Average IInterstate nterstate 3.47 Involuntary Involuntary migration migration c conflict onfl fliict IInformation nformation National National iinfrastructure nfrastructure governance governance breakdown breakdown failure failure Illicit Illicit trade trade Cyberattacks Cyberattacks Social Social instability instability Terrorist attacks Terrorist attacks State State collapse collapse D Data ata fraud fraud A Adverse dverse ttechnological echnological o orr theft theft a advances dvances Energy price Energy price shock shock Unemployment Unemployment Fiscal crises Fiscal crises F Financial inancial failure failure .0 U Unmanageable nmanageable iinflation nfl flaation Asset Assetbubbles bubble Deflation Defl flaation 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Average Likelihood 3.32 Economic Geopolitical Technological Risks Risks Risks Number and strength Environmental Societal of connections Risks Risks (“weighted degree”) Source: World Economic Forum Global Risks Note: Survey respondents were asked to select up to six pairs of global risks they believe to be most Note: Survey respondents were asked to select up to six pairs of global risks they believe to be most interconnected. PerceptionWorld Source: SurveyEconomic 2019–2020.Forum Global Risks See interconnected. Seedetails. Appendix B for more Appendix B oflegibility, To ensure the fullthe report namesforofmore details. the global risks To are ensure legibility, abbreviated; the the names see Appendix A for of Perception Survey 2019–2020. fullglobal names risks are abbreviated; see Appendix A for the full name and description. and descriptions.
The World Economic Forum, committed to improving the state of the world, is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation. The Forum engages the foremost political, business and other leaders of society to shape global, regionaland industry agendas. World Economic Forum 91–93 route de la Capite CH-1223 Cologny/Geneva Switzerland Tel.: +41 (0) 22 869 1212 Fax: +41 (0) 22 786 2744 contact@weforum.org www.weforum.org
You can also read