The European Commission's science and knowledge service - Joint Research Centre - unece
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Defining BAT under the Industrial Emissions Directive – History and Procedures Thomas Brinkmann European IPPC Bureau, European Commission's Joint Research Centre Workshop to Promote the Ratification of Technical Protocols of the UNECE Air Convention with Focus on Countries in the EECCA Region – 14 to 16 May 2019, Berlin, Germany 2
Outline 1 – The European IPPC Bureau 2 – The Industrial Emissions Directive 3 – The 'Sevilla Process' 3
The European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Bureau – EIPPCB • Created in 1997 • Part of the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) (Circular Economy and Industrial Leadership Unit of the JRC's Directorate B – Growth and Innovation) • Main output: BAT reference documents, the BREFs, and their key parts, the BAT conclusions • 20 staff, of which 16 scientific and 4 support staff 4
Outline 1 – The European IPPC Bureau 2 – The Industrial Emissions Directive 3 – The 'Sevilla Process' 5
Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU (IED) • Key instrument for minimising emissions and consumption of industrial activities in Europe • General framework: prevent and, if not feasible, reduce pollution high level of protection for the environment as a whole permit based on Best Available Techniques (BAT) 6
Industrial scope of the IED Wide range of industrial activities listed in Annex I: • Energy industries • Production and processing of metals • Mineral industries Cement, Lime, Glass, Ceramics • Production of chemicals • Waste management industries Several recovery or disposal operations; incineration • Other activities Pulp and paper; textile processing; tanning of hides and skins; intensive rearing of poultry or pigs; slaughterhouses and animal by-products; food, drink and milk; surface treatment using organic solvents 7
Environmental scope of the IED emissions emissions to water to air waste prevention prevention and recovery energy & and control water use of accidents vibration odour noise heat 8
BAT in the IED IED Article 3(10): Best Available Techniques Developed on a scale Most effective in Both the technology which allows achieving a high used and the way the implementation in the general level of installation is relevant industrial sector, protection of the designed, built, under economically and environment as a maintained, operated technically viable whole and decommissioned conditions 9
Role of BAT conclusions in permitting • IED Article 14(3): BAT conclusions are the reference for setting permit conditions of IED installations • IED Article 15(3): Permits to contain emission limit values (ELVs) to ensure that, under normal operating conditions, emissions do not exceed BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) • IED Article 15(4): Derogation from BAT‐AELs is only allowed in specific and justified cases 10
Reconsideration/update of permit conditions IED Article 21(3): • Within four years of publication of BAT conclusions relating to the main activity of an installation: (a)reconsideration and, if necessary, update of all permit conditions (b)installation complies with those permit conditions • Reconsideration shall take into account all the new or updated BAT conclusions 11
Outline 1 – The European IPPC Bureau 2 – The Industrial Emissions Directive 3 – The 'Sevilla Process' 12
History of the 'Sevilla Process' • Information exchange started in 1997 under the predecessor legislation, the IPPC Directive • Several guidance documents for the information exchange were developed and updated under the IPPC Directive • Information exchange was codified into law with Commission Implementing Decision 2012/119/EU • Information exchange is coordinated by the EIPPCB based in Seville, hence called 'Sevilla Process' • Continuous further evolution of the process (e.g. use of webinars, data assessment workshops) 13
The 'Sevilla Process' Industry TWG EU Member States + EEA countries kick-off meeting Draft 1 (D1) Bulk of info. needed Draft 2 (D2)* Comments (incl. questionnaires) * D2 optional Final TWG meeting Total duration: • 24 – 29 months (without D2) Final draft • 29 – 39 months (with D2) BAT conclu- sions 14
Evidence-based and participatory decision making (1/3) 2. Select 'well- 4. Collect plant- 1. Installations in the performing 3. Design specific data EU (and outside) plants' questionnaire 7. BREFs and BAT 6. Experts 5. Process and analyse conclusions meeting(s) data/info 15
Evidence-based and participatory decision making (2/3) • Approximately 80 to 230 experts involved • Kick-off meeting to decide on the scope, key environmental issues and the process (3 to 4 days) • Process to draft questionnaire for collecting plant-specific information • Commenting on draft BREFs: 500 to 8500 comments that are assessed individually • Up to two data assessment workshops • TWG subgroups on complex issues • Final meetings (3 to 7 days) with up to 140 participants • Transparency: BATIS and EIPPCB website 16
TSS (mg/l) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 Ultraf 08 Bio Ultraf 118 Bio Sed 042 PC SF 34 Bio 5 Filtr 117 PC NI SF Filt PC Bio Flot NI 113 PC Sed Ultraf Filtr 105 Bio SF 61 Bio Abbreviation Sed 03 Bio 10 SF 01 Bio NI 98 Bio < LOD: #69 (Bio) < 5 mg/l: #36 (Bio) Sed 86 PC Sed 63 Bio Sed 62 Bio NI 73 PC 15 Flotation Meaning NI 85 PC Sed 67 PC Ultrafiltration Sand filtration Flot 75 Bio Sedimentation Sed 02 Bio Sed 07 Bio 20 Biological treatment NI 90 Bio Sed 84 PC No information provided making (3/3) Sed 40 Bio Sed 93 PC NI 96 Bio 25 NI 95 PC Effluent values not shown in the graph: Sed 87 Bio Physico-chemical treatment only Sed 54 Bio Flot 21 Bio Flot 33 Bio 30 SF 32 PC Filtration (includes Membrane bioreactor) Flot 11 Bio Sed 41 Bio Sed 94 PC Flot 64 Bio 35 Sed 19 Bio Sed 79 PC Sed 91 Bio Flot 60 Bio Number of WWTP SF 115 PC 40 Sed 49 Bio NI 92 Bio Flot 10 Bio SF 45 Bio 45 Sed 53 PC SF 120 PC Sed 041 Bio NI 116 PC Sed 27 PC Flot 50 Bio 50 Sed 89 Bio NI 111 PC Sed 17 Bio Flot. 51 Bio Sed 70 Bio 55 Sed 82 Bio NI 80 PC Sed 100 Bio Flot 29 Bio NT 119 PC 60 NI 74 Bio NI 83 Bio Sed 48 Bio TSS emissions to water from the chemical sector Sed 37 Bio NI 101 Bio 65 Sed 47 Bio Sed 57 Bio NI 114 PC Sed 18 Bio NI 121 PC 70 (yearly average) Sed 25 Bio BAT-AEL: 5 – 35 mg/l Evidence-based and participatory decision 17
BREF review progress under the IED (1/4) 14 BREFs reviewed and published, including BAT conclusions: 1. Iron and Steel Production (IS); 2. Manufacture of Glass (GLS); 3. Tanning of Hides and Skins (TAN); 4. Production of Cement, Lime and Magnesium Oxide (CLM); 5. Production of Chlor-Alkali (CAK); 6. Production of Pulp, Paper and Board (PP); 7. Refining of Mineral Oil and Gas (REF); 8. Common Waste Water and Waste Gas Treatment/ Management Systems in the Chemical Sector (CWW); … 18
BREF review progress under the IED (2/4) … 9. Wood-Based Panels Production (WBP); 10. Non-ferrous Metals Industries (NFM); 11. Intensive Rearing of Poultry or Pigs (IRPP); 12. Large Combustion Plants (LCP); 13. Production of Large Volume Organic Chemicals (LVOC); 14. Waste Treatment (WT). 1 Reference report published: • Monitoring of Emissions to Air and Water from IED Installations (ROM). 19
BREF review progress under the IED (3/4) 8 BREFs being worked upon: 1. Food, Drink and Milk Industries (FDM); 2. Waste Incineration (WI); 3. Surface Treatment using Organic Solvents/Wood Preservation with Chemicals (STS); 4. Ferrous Metals Processing Industry (FMP); 5. Common Waste Gas Treatment in the Chemical Sector (WGC); 6. Textiles Industry (TXT); 7. Slaughterhouses and Animal By-products Industries (SA); 8. Smitheries and Foundries Industry (SF). 20
BREF review progress under the IED (4/4) Work on 3 more BREFs to start in 2019 to 2020: 1. Ceramics Manufacturing Industry (CER); 2. Surface Treatment of Metals and Plastics (STM); 3. Production of Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals (LVIC). 21
Ongoing challenges • Management of input • Time-consuming process • Transparency • Where and how to focus? • Involvement of equipment suppliers • Achieving consensus in marathon-like meetings • High staff turnover and need for qualified staff 22
Key messages on the 'Sevilla Process' • Highly participatory, transparent and fact-based process • Process evolved and matured over 20 years • Consensus that the process is fit for purpose • Good results depend on good data 23
Further information • Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32010L0075 • Commission Implementing Decision 2012/119/EU on the 'Sevilla Process': https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32012D0119 • BREFs, draft BREFs, BAT conclusions and TWG kick-off meeting reports: http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/ • Documents of the IED Article 13 Forum (e.g. work programme on the exchange of information), of the IED Article 75 Committee, of the Industrial Emissions Expert Group as well as other IED-related studies: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/1d945fd8-0d7e-4418-bac4-1c2f4a91af3e • Website of the European Commission's Directorate General for Environment on industrial emissions: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/industry/stationary/index.htm 24
Any questions? You can contact us at jrc-b5-eippcb@ec.europa.eu 25
You can also read