NEUTRON CAPTURE CROSS SECTION MEASUREMENTS ON SHORT-LIVED ISOTOPES - PI: SEAN LIDDICK COPI: ARTEMIS SPYROU SSAP SYMPOSIUM, FEB. 16-18, 2021
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Neutron capture cross section measurements on short-lived isotopes PI: Sean Liddick CoPI: Artemis Spyrou SSAP Symposium, Feb. 16-18, 2021
Neutron capture cross section measurements on short-lived isotopes • Scientific Challenge – Constrain neutron capture cross sections of short-lived nuclei for stewardship science and astrophysical production of heavy elements. • Goals – Investigate the spin dependence of the γ-ray strength function using the β decay of isomeric states. – Constrain neutron capture cross sections of interest for stockpile stewardship approaching 95Zr and i- process nuclei – Train graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in nuclear science techniques and connect them with staff at the national laboratories. 2 SSAP 2021
Neutron capture cross section measurements on short-lived isotopes • PI: Sean Liddick Associate Prof. National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory and Department of Chemistry • Co-PI: Artemis Spyrou Professor National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory and Department of Physics and Astronomy • Two graduate students and one postdoc supported: – Debra Richman (MSU, graduate student) – Andrea Richard (MSU, postdoctoral researcher) – Katherine Childers (MSU, graduate student Texas A&M University 2021) – Rebecca Lewis (graduated MSU, graduate student NNSA GFP Summer 2019) – Benjamin Crider (postdoctoral researcher MissSU Assistant Professor) – Mallory Smith (MSU, postdoctoral researcher staff NSCL) • Peer-reviewed papers - M. Guttormsen et. al., Acta. Phys. Pol. B51, 667 (2020) - R. Lewis et. al., Phys. Rev. C 99, 034601 (2019) - A. Spyrou, Annals of Physics 412, 168017 (2020) - A.C Dombos et. al. Phys. Rev. C 99, 015802 (2019) - Ong et al, PRL (2021) - A.C. Larsen et al., Phys. Rev. C 97, 054329 (2018) - S.N. Liddick, et al., Phys. Rev. C 100, 024624 (2019) - A.Spyrou, A.C. Larsen, S.N. Liddick et al., J. Phys. G 44, - A. Voinov, et. Al., Phys. Rev. C 99, 054609 (2019) 044002 (2017) 3 SSAP 2021
Significant laboratory engagement by supported graduate students • Katherine Childers – β-Oslo on 83Se for 82Se (n,γ) – Direct (n,γ) at LANL with DANCE – 2-month placement at LANL. – Performed work with neutron science experimenters and theorists at LANL including A. Couture and C. Prokop – Manuscript in preparation. – Completed thesis in 2020. β-Oslo matrix for 83Se Direct (n,γ) on 82Se target 4 SSAP 2021
Significant laboratory engagement by supported graduate students • Debra Richman – Permanently placed at Los Alamos National Laboratory working within the P-27 group with A. Couture and S. Mosby. – Performing analysis to extract neutron capture cross section of 59Fe, a key reaction rate in the astrophysical s-process. – First results presented at 60Fe Nuclear Astrophysics winter school Russbach 2017, NASA Laboratory Astrophysics 2018, DNP 2019 – Expected graduation in 2021 5 SSAP 2021
Scientific program focused on rapid-neutron capture process, slow neutron capture process, and stewardship science. Completed • Inferring neutron capture cross sections on S.Liddick (MSU): short-lived nuclei receiving strong support New technique for neutron capture from NSCL and ANL Program Advisory Approved cross section Committee. measurements on short-lived nuclei S. Liddick (MSU): Neutron-capture cross section constraints in A. Spyrou (MSU): neutron-rich Sn and Constraints on Sb isotopes nucleosynthesis in Completed the iron region A. Spyrou (MSU): Approved Constraints on A. Spyrou (MSU) / neutron-capture S. Liddick (MSU): reactions around Constraining N=82 supernova models with SuN A.C. Larsen (Oslo): The rare-earth r- N. Scielzo (LLNL): process peak: 156- Determination of the 92Sr 159Sm(n,g) reaction neutron-capture cross rates constrained with section and fission the beta-Oslo method product burn up. – A. Spyrou (MSU): Study of Kr isotopes for astrophysical applications. 6 SSAP 2021
Nuclear level densities and γ-ray strength functions are the dominate uncertainties in (n,γ) calculations Hauser – Feshbach • Nuclear Level Density Constant T+Fermi gas, back-shifted Fermi gas, superfluid, microscopic Level density • γ-ray strength function Generalized Lorentzian, Brink-Axel, various tables • Optical model potential Phenomenological, Semi-microscopic γ-strength function OMP ALL 95Sr(n,γ)96Sr TALYS 7 SSAP 2021
Extrapolation of nuclear level densities and γ-ray strength functions to exotic nuclei are uncertain γ-ray strength functions Level densities • Unexpected structural • What is N,Z dependence features. of a? 8 A.C. Larsen et al., Phys. Rev. C, 82, 014318 (2010) SSAP 2021 Al-Quraishi et al., Phys. Rev. C 63, 065803 (2001)
Using beta decay total absorption spectroscopy to infer neutron capture cross sections • Measure beta decay of nucleus. – Extract level densities and gamma-ray strength function • Need total excitation energy of the daughter isotope. – Can’t use beta-decay electron (three body process) • Instead, measure total emitted photon energy. • Require high detection efficiency. • Extract nuclear level density and γ-ray strength function. • Insert both quantities into a statistical reaction model to constrain (n,γ) rate. 9 SSAP 2021
Testing Spin Independence of γSF: Decay of 70Cu isomeric states over a wide spin range • Test the independence of the γSF from 1+ 243 93% different initial spin distributions. 3- 101 • 70Cu has three different isomeric states. 52% • Experiment completed summer 2019, 6- 0 analysis is ongoing. 70Cu 100% 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 Percentage 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Spin 10 SSAP 2021
70Cu beta decay as a probe of the spin independence of the γSF 1+ 3- g.s. (6-) • Multiple isomeric states 35 16% 26% 58% produced. 34 • Ran beam on/beam off cycle of TOF [µs] 10/10 minutes 33 • Analysis in progress. 32 31 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 νrf - 2,055,181.5 [Hz] 11 SSAP 2021
(n,γ) uncertainties impact the intermediate-neutron capture process for heavy element creation •Neutron density: 1015 cm-3, intermediate between s process, and r process •Proposed in the 1970s and revived recently to explain observations of “strange” abundance distributions (post-AGB, CEMP stars, and RAWDs) •Requires mixing between H and He layers of the star •Neutron production: 13C( ,n)16O reaction, like s-process •13C replenished via 12C(p, )13N, then 13N(e+)13C, T (13N) ~ 10 1/2 minutes 12 SSAP 2021
(n,γ) uncertainties impact the intermediate neutron- capture process for heavy element creation • Neutron-capture (n,γ) uncertainties reactions affect the final abundance distribution. • Varying the reactions within their uncertainties shows which reactions have a larger impact Y /Zr 87-89Kr(n,γ)88-90Kr reactions can affect the abundances Sr of Rb, Sr, Y and Zr /Y 13 Denissenkov et al. JPG 2018 SSAP 2021
135I (n,γ) rates studied indirectly from the decay of Te isotopes inform the i-process La /Eu Ba/La • 135I(n,γ)136I – bottleneck affecting Ex (keV) the production of heavier elements • Experiment performed at ANL to constrain this reaction indirectly • β- decay of 136Te -> 136I Eγ (keV) 14 SSAP 2021
Neutron capture needs for diagnostics: 95Zr Importance Factor IF = IY * ADT Measured IY is maximum independent yield Known cross-sections ADT = 2 (A=95), 1 (A=94,96), (n,γ) 0.5 (A=93,97) 93Zr 94Zr (n,γ) 95Zr (n,γ) 96Zr (n,γ) 97Zr 1.5E6 y (n,2n) Stable (n,2n) 64.02 d (n,2n) Stable 16.8 h (n,2n) (n,p) (n,p) IF (n,p) (n,p) (n,p) β β β β β >5 (n,γ) 94Y (n,γ) 95Y 93Y (n,γ) 96Y (n,γ) 97Y 1-5 • 95Zr can be 0.9s/10.2h (n,2n) 18.7 m (n,2n) 10.3 m (n,2n) 9.6s/5.3s (n,2n) 1.2s/3.8s 0.5-1 (n,p) (n,p) (n,p) (n,p) used as a yield β β β (n,p) β β (n,γ) 0.1-0.5 (n,γ) (n,γ) (n,γ) indicator. 93Sr 94Sr 95Sr 96Sr 97Sr < 0.1 7.41 m (n,2n) 1.25 m (n,2n) 25.1 s (n,2n) 1.07 s (n,2n) 0.43 s • However, 95Sr (n,p) (n,p) (n,p) (n,p) (n,p) β β β β β is short lived 93Rb (n,γ) 94Rb (n,γ) 95Rb (n,γ) 96Rb (n,γ) 97Rb and can’t be 5.85 s (n,2n) 2.71 s (n,2n) 377 ms (n,2n) 199 ms (n,2n) 169 ms made into a β (n,p) β (n,p) β (n,p) β (n,p) β (n,p) target. 93Kr (n,γ) 94Kr (n,γ) 95Kr (n,γ) 96Kr (n,γ) 97Kr • UCB, LLNL, MSU, Oslo 1.29 s (n,2n) 0.21 s (n,2n) 0.78 s (n,2n) UK (n,2n)
Decay of 93Rb: Providing (n,γ) for 92Sr • Experiment to deliver thermal 93Rb 93Rb − within last year to perform stopped t1/2 =5.84(2) s 93Sr beam β-decay with 93Rb. − • Moving tape collector and interior plastic t1/2 =7.43(3) m 93Y scintillator completed previously. t1/2 =10.18(8) h Total Absorption Spectra 93Rb counts Production Runs (thermal) SuN Daughter Runs Only levels in • Analysis in progress; working 93Y on response function of plastic scintillator within SuN. E (keV) 16 SSAP 2021
Conclusions • Application of technique to infer neutron capture cross sections on short-lived neutron-rich nuclei ongoing. • Applicable to studies of rapid-neutron capture process, intermediate neutron capture process, slow-neutron capture process, and stewardship science. – Studies of sensitive i-process nuclei. – Neutron-rich 59Fe analysis nearing completion – Stockpile stewardship analysis on neutron-rich Sr isotopes in progress • Investigation of spin dependence of strength function using isomeric states in 70Cu – analysis in progress • Funding supports two graduate students and one postdoctoral researcher strongly connected to the national laboratories. 17 SSAP 2021
Thanks Michigan State University University of Oslo LLNL • A. Spyrou • A.C. Larsen • D.L. Bluel • S.N. Liddick • M. Guttormsen • N. Scielzo • B.P. Crider • L. Crespo Campo • K. Childers • S. Siem LANL • A.C. Dombos • T. Renstrøm • A. Couture • R. Lewis • S. Mosby • F. Naqvi Central Michigan University • M. Mumpower • C.J. Prokop • G. Perdikakis • S.J. Quinn • S. Nikas • A. Rodriguez • C.S. Sumithrarachchi Notre Dame • R.G.T. Zegers • A. Simon • R. Surman 18 SSAP 2021
Questions? 19 SSAP 2021
You can also read