Role of Career Education Advisor/Expert and Teaching Quality in Student Employability Skills as the Outcome of Higher Education Gulnaz Zahid

Page created by Alex Manning
 
CONTINUE READING
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)                         Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences                                     Vol 5 No 27
 ISSN 2039-9340 (print)                                 MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy                                       December 2014

                         Role of Career Education Advisor/Expert and Teaching Quality in Student
                                         Employability Skills as the Outcome of Higher Education

                                                                                                                     Gulnaz Zahid
                   Assistant Professor, Center for Counseling and Career Advisory, National University of Sciences and Technology,
                                                                                                Islamabad, H-12 Campus. Pakistan
                                                                                                          gulnazzahid@hotmail.com

Doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n27p669

Abstract

      Quality of education is a multidimensional concept encompassing institutional, teaching and student outcome variables.
      Effective student transition to labor market as a student outcome owes due importance especially at the higher educational
      level. This is attainable when quality and strategies in higher education are designed to develop student employability skills and
      in accordance with the demands of labor market. Therefore, this study investigates the role of career education expert/advisor
      in improving various aspects of teacher quality with the supposition that student employability skills primarily depend upon the
      services of education expert but mainly through teaching techniques. Data was collected by the in-depth interviews from the
      selected teachers of National University of Sciences and Technology and Federal Urdu University, Islamabad. Findings both
      support and challenge this study’s proposed paradigm and offer insight into the multiple roles of education expert/advisor in the
      universities. Conclusion and suggestions have been made accordingly.

Keywords: Career education expert; Teaching Method; Higher education; Student outcomes; Student employability skills

1. Introduction

1.1    Background and rationale

Definitions of quality education revolve around its five key aspects, i.e., environments, content, processes, outcomes and
learners (“UNICEF,” 2000). The first four components, depending upon the quality can produce desirable or undesirable
affects upon student outcomes. Each of these components has instrumental role for student outcomes and therefore
student outcomes form the nexus of the whole debate. This interrelationship of the institutional and teaching variables in
connection to student outcomes evolves as a matter of prime significance when we investigate impacts of higher
education. Within this framework, linking students of higher education with the labor market emerges as a challenge for
which the quality of higher education is evidently responsible.
       The foremost function of higher education is the effective student transition from education to work, which is
hallmark of the educational success in all the societies. This paper explores these phenomena by re-emphasizing the
links between higher education and labor market and by empirically investigating how quality of teachers is connected to
linking students with employment and why and how the role of career education advisor/expert enters in this framework.
This study contributes in literature by investigating crucial educational factors responsible for linking students with labor
market, which can lead to substantial findings for varied cultural contexts.
       Quality of higher education is interpreted in varied ways by various stakeholders (Becket & Brookes, 2008) and
teachers’ role remains unchallenged in that. Quality of higher education receives global influences and we envision a
massive shift of focus from education process and institutional variables to student outcomes. Though it is inevitable to
produce student outcomes without considering the input and process variables within the educational system, student
outcome can rightly be considered one of the main criteria of quality of education.
       All this debate shows that careers form a central point of discussion within the quality framework of higher
education. Fact that quality of higher education prepares individuals’ ability to fetch employment according to their skills
and interests, ability to contribute nationally and ability to find opportunities within the regional and global trends which
keeps on increasing their employability to live a self-fulfilling and socially contributive lives, compels us to explore the
antecedents and determinants of employability. In this connection, this paper considers entrance into employment as the
one of the most substantial, tangible and measurable outcome of higher education. In present era, importance of
employment navigates around success of individuals, societies and global development. The self-fulfilling individuals can

                                                                    669
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)                   Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences                              Vol 5 No 27
 ISSN 2039-9340 (print)                           MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy                                December 2014

make meaningful, significant and effective contribution at national, regional and global levels. Therefore, careers form a
central point of reference for all at both the individual and societal levels.
        Importance of careers as the outcome of higher education indicates that its processes, content and environments
should emancipate individuals with the potential. This signifies importance of career education expert/advisor in higher
education institutes. Therefore, in this corporate world, quality of higher education is intertwined with the opportunities
and possibilities of career education. In light of this argument, this study intends to explore the role of education advisor/
expert in uplifting the quality of higher education primarily through improving teaching quality and then reaches at the
suggestions relating to the role of education advisor/expert in that. Most importantly, this study aims to test the
assumption that education advisor can link students with the labor market through improving teacher quality.
Furthermore, if this assumption is supported, it is worthwhile to find the aspects of teaching which carry proponent role for
student employability skills and which can be positively influenced by a strategic approach of career education
advisor/expert.
        Empirical investigation of the roles of career education expert /advisor for various aspects of quality teaching can
be of significance to various contexts. Around the world, career advisory has earned firm position in higher education
institutes. There is a Center for Counseling and Career Advisory at the National University of Sciences and Technology,
Pakistan. Similarly, there is Columbia University Center for Career Education (“Columbia University,”2014), there is a
Cawley Career Education Center at the Georgetown University (http://careercenter.georgetown.edu/) and a focus on
career education in the Marryville University of St. Louis (“Marryville University,” 2013) and similar trends prevail in
various other universities. Research-based investigation on the role of career education expert/advisor for linking
students to the labor market can be significantly helpful in devising their roles advisor/expert at the university level.

1.2   Importance of career education in national and international perspective for the quality of higher education

Career education refers to preparation for the labor market and workforce and facilitating the transition from education to
work. Wendy (2005) elaborates change in career education due to a shift of societies from industrial to post-industrial.
Watts (2012) refers to this post-industrial society to the “knowledge society”, which obviously demands knowledge,
cognitive and intellectual skills. Despite of this generic notion, countries at different levels of development have different
educational needs (Fasih, 2008), still we cannot deny that labor market trends are likely to influence the college and
university level programs (“The Aspen,” 2013).Internationally research has identified links between the education and
labor markets by research.
        Links between quality of teachers and student employability skills have been established previously by the
empirical studies (Udofia, Ekpo, & Nsa, Akpan, 2012; Zinser, 2003) and the role of universities has been found to be
crucially important for the development of student employability skills such as by the University of Stirling
(http://www.stir.ac.uk/academicpolicy) and hence we can infer the significant importance of higher education for linking
students with the labor market.
        There is a vast literature regarding connectedness of education with the employability skills of the students but with
the mixed results. Research indicating the extent to which higher education institutes (HEI) prepare students for
employability need not to mention here rather there is an explicit need to overview the findings reported by various
studies on the role of HEI and student employability skills. In this connection, Lowden, Hall, Elliot, and Lewin (2011) have
identified that amongst various other reasons, employability skills may be influenced by the extent to which courses meet
the needs of labor market. Other studies somewhat provide a glimpse that employability skills go beyond academics and
discrepant perceptions between the student and employers exist which can be considered as a consequence of gaps in
quality education. Research by Wild and Wood (2013) identified that employers are not much satisfied from certain
employability skills of the graduates, which includes business and commercial awareness, self-management and team
work, while the graduates and students recognized teamwork, motivation and enthusiasm as important employability
skills but lacked confidence in them. All this argument can be summed up in work by Silver (2003), who reported a weak
connection between universities and student employability skills.
        All this debate indicates that there are numerous reasons for the mismatch between individual’s skills and
occupations. A mismatch between the student skill and occupation is not only the concern in Pakistani context (Farooq,
2011), it is also a crucial matter of concern in other countries as indicted by the international scholars (Machin & McNally,
2007). Exploration of factors for this can lead to the evidence-based strategic planning.
        Role of career education in student employability has been realized and much debate, review and research has
been contributed so far in the literature (Bimrose, Barnes, & Jamie, 2005; Fung & Wong, 2012). However, this study is an
extension to the previous ones which aims to test the role of career education advisor/expert for student employability

                                                             670
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)                   Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences                             Vol 5 No 27
 ISSN 2039-9340 (print)                          MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy                                December 2014

and through comparing different aspects of quality teaching and related factors. Research from this perspective and from
the developing contexts is still scant, therefore it can be said that findings which emerge may be of significance to the
contexts closer in problems and challenges to ours.
       The paramount importance of teachers for the quality education necessitates their understanding and capacity to
develop student employability skills can have potential to improve their teaching style and methods. However, teachers
might be lacking perspective with reference to the labor market skills worth focusing for the job entrance and here enters
the significant role of career education expert/advisor in the framework. Trends of career education at the university level
can shift teaching paradigm from memorization to practicability of information and concepts. This assumption leads to the
mediation model in which effective role of education an advisor/expert is mediated through quality teaching for the
development of labor market entrance skills of the students.
       This study seeks to determine the kind of roles of education expert/advisor which are likely to enhance student
employability skills especially through improving particular aspects of teaching and the kind of strategies required to
infuse the role of career education advisor/expert in higher education institutes.

2.    Procedure

Qualitative method was considered to elicit in-depth information relating to the aspects of teaching methods/strategies,
which play pivotal role in effectively linking students with labor market and possible roles of career education
advisor/expert within this framework. This method provided ample opportunities to investigate context-based issues and
teachers’ perceptions on the basis of their prior experiences.
       For this study, data was collected from 30 faculty members from varied disciplines from the two selected
universities. These teachers were approached from selected universities of Islamabad (Pakistan), i.e., the National
University of Sciences and Technology (NUST) and the Federal Urdu University. In-depth interviews were conducted with
the teachers. A questionnaire was developed in order to conduct the interviews (Table1-3). It comprised of three open-
ended questions and was reviewed by three experts having advance research degree in social sciences and three to five
years of work experience at the National University of Social Sciences and Technology.
       Face to face interviews were conducted by the researcher. The verbatim statements were recorded by noting down
all the responses and themes were developed after analyses. Importance of each of these themes was ascertained by
counting the frequency of responses across the sample and calculating the percentages which further assisted in
comparing the importance of themes. This method supported addressing the research questions adequately.

2.1   Sample

Interviews of 30 teachers were conducted from two selected universities. These two universities were selected on the
basis of the Pakistani universities’ ranking data (“Top Universities,” 2014). One of the top Universities named as National
University of Sciences and Technology (NUST, Islamabad) and another university standing on 31st number out of total 64
universities was selected.
       Those teachers who were available at the time of data collection from the two selected universities participated in
the study entirely on a voluntary basis. From NUST, 6 teachers were from Electrical Engineering Department, 2 were
from Physical Geography related department, 1 was from Environmental Science and Engineering, 2 were from the
department related to cell Biology and Immunology, 3 were from Business School and 1 was from Civil Engineering.
There were 4 female and 11 males in the total sample of 15.
       From the Federal Urdu University, 4 teachers were from Human Resource Management, 2 from Urdu department,
1 from Pakistan Studies Department, 3 from Physics Department, 1 from Functional Accounting Department, 1 from
Economics Department, 2 from Business studies and 1 from Electrical Engineering Department. There were 7 female and
8 male teachers in this total sample of 15.
       This sample was small and purposive but was considered to be adequate for addressing the research questions.
The questionnaire developed was at the generic level and therefore findings can be meaningful and applicable for the
varied contexts. It is noteworthy that students’ socioeconomic background varies considerably between the two
universities and hence findings can be generalized to numerous universities having students from various socio-
economic backgrounds. Next given are the results and discussion derived on the basis of in-depth interviews.

                                                            671
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)                        Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences                                        Vol 5 No 27
 ISSN 2039-9340 (print)                                MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy                                          December 2014

3.   Results and Discussion

Below given are the results and associated findings which were interpreted by analyzing the responses of the participants
on the three main questions of this study. On the basis of findings, a model was developed pertaining to the role of career
education advisor/expert for student employability through quality teaching.

Table 1: Responses on the question one

                                                                                                                           Total
                        Do you think that the subject you are teaching can really develop skills of the students
       Question 1
                        to seek employment in a company?
        Theme 1         Curriculum/courses according to the need and labor market                                          26.6%
        Theme 2         Bookish or theoretical knowledge is mostly imparted                                                23.3%
        Theme 3         Subject is itself practical                                                                        63.3%
        Theme 4         Teaching styles of the teachers affect students’ job seeking and seeking employment                43.3%

Table 1 shows that less than half of the sample of this study believed in lack of alignment of the courses/ curriculum with
the labor market needs. Furthermore, bookish/theoretical teaching was reported as an important reason for lack of
student employment skills. On the other hand, above 63.3% of the sample believed that practicability of the subject is
crucial in order to connect teaching with the development of the employability skills of the students.
       Majority participants of this sample emphasized teaching styles of the teachers (43.3%) when compared to the
relevancy of curriculum and courses (26.6%) is the crucial factor for connecting students with the labor market. This
shows that teachers play significantly important role when compared to other educational factors such as curriculum and
courses. Additionally, practicability of a subject exerts extra advantage for both teachers and students and has better
chances for linking the students with the labor market.

Table 2: Responses on the question two

                            In what ways your teaching style could improve so that students are
           Question 2
                            able to seek employment in various companies/industries?
            Theme 1         Practical activities/lab /instruments missing                                           50%
            Theme 2         Interactive activities/discussions needed                                              36.6%
            Theme 3         Teacher training missing or of low quality                                             36.6%
            Theme 4         Concept building is required                                                            3.3%

Table 2 shows that various aspects of teaching methods help students to develop their employability skills. However, the
main reason reported for lack of connectedness of teaching style with student employability skills was inadequate focus
upon the practical activities, as shared by the 50% of the participants.

Table 3: Responses on the question three

                            Do you think that there is a need of career education /advisor in your
           Question 3
                            program so that you can link your course to the needs of labor market?
           Theme 1          Yes, very important role of education advisor/expert                                     43.3%
           Theme 2          Education advisor/expert not needed in the program                                       16.6%
           Theme 3          Education advisor/expert can improve/modify program                                       20%
           Theme 4          Education advisor can guide students and teachers                                         56%
           Theme 5          Education advisor/expert is important for student placement in labor market              16.6%

Table 3 shows that nearly half of the sample narrated importance of the role of education advisor/expert to link students
with the labor market. More than half of the sample shared that education advisor can help both the teachers and
students for the development of student employability skills.
       Findings of this study support the previous ones which indicate importance of practical side of teaching and
learning for student employability. Hefferman, Feng, Angel, and Fang (2010) empirically found eight attributes crucial for
the employment of the marketing students when the perspectives of the employers were taken. These eight attributes

                                                                   672
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)                    Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences                              Vol 5 No 27
 ISSN 2039-9340 (print)                           MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy                                 December 2014

were (a) communication, (b) team work, (c) problem solving, (d) work ethic, (e) desirable persona, (f) customer focus, (g)
core skills, and (h) leadership. This signifies the importance of practical work in the curriculum and courses. Similarly,
Wheeler (2010) also indicated the embedded nature of practical work in courses and curriculum of the environment
management programs with the underlying aim to develop the attributes of graduates for employability. Furthermore, De
Weert (2011) indicated that practice-oriented research by universities of applied sciences has an important role in forming
the relationship with the professional field. As per these studies it can be deduce that employability skills cannot be
developed without having hands-on experience. Hence, the placement of career education expert/advisor in HEI is
justified. It also identifies the associated roles. Introducing the practical courses and making teaching learning practical
significantly linked to the labor market can be considered foremost important role of an education expert/advisor.

4.   Model on the Role of Career Education Advisor/Expert for Student Employability through Quality Teaching

This study was conducted to develop a model deeply embedded in the investigation of the role and direction of the career
education expert/advisor for the development of student employability skills specifically through teaching methods. Rather
than exploration of the domains of job entrance skills such as employability skills, investigation of the aspects of quality
teaching deemed necessary for exploration, because they play crucial role in developing student employability skills.
       On the basis of results, it can be ascertained that the primary role of career education expert/advisor in the
universities can be (a) to review for the practicality and applicability of the courses, and (b) help teachers to improve
practical side of teaching and learning other than directly guiding the students.
       They can also strategically impart trainings to teachers in order to develop their sensitivity pertinent to the needs of
labor market, so that they review courses/curriculum accordingly. Improvement in teaching styles and techniques for the
development of student employability skills was also found to be an important concern.

5.   Conclusion and Suggestions

Career education advisor/expert can play a crucial role to improve the quality of teaching which can strategically link
students with the labor market specifically by enriching their practical and applied aspects of both teaching and learning
and by reviewing the courses for their practicability. On the basis of findings it can be suggested that universities should
place education expert/ advisor in their programs to support both faculty and the students in multiple ways. This research
identified primary and secondary roles through a small scale study, which can be a meaningful contribution in both theory
and practice.
        Further studies can be conducted to investigate strategies/approaches of education advisor/expert in the
universities for making courses practical, leading to teacher involvement for improvement in curriculum and instruction for
positive student outcomes.

6.   Implications

This study tests the paradigm leading to the concise findings relating to the primary and secondary roles of a career
education expert/advisor for the development and enhancement of student employability skills. Findings are worth
application and testing under supervision of the monitoring bodies for effectiveness, beyond a particular context and
university.

7.   Limitations

Major limitation of this study pertains to the sampling technique, i.e., purposive sampling. However, generic nature of
questions and cumulative analysis lead to the findings applicable elsewhere most importantly similar to our contexts.
Reaching conclusion on the basis of data from the teachers having different expertise can be considered another
limitation. Notwithstanding the before, the findings are worth consideration because of involving the faculty members from
variety of disciplines. It has provided a general idea with reference to the research questions and findings may be of
interest to universities having varied disciplines.

                                                             673
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)                       Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences                                    Vol 5 No 27
 ISSN 2039-9340 (print)                               MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy                                      December 2014

References

Becket, N., & Brookes, M. (2008).Quality management practice in higher education – What quality are we actually enhancing? Journal of
        Hospitality, Leisure, Sports and Tourism Education, 7 (1), 40-54.doi: 10.3794/johlste.71.174
Bimrose, J., Barnes, S-A., & Brown, J. (2005).A systematic literature review of research into career-related interventions for higher
        education. Retrieved from http://www.hecsu.ac.uk/assets/assets/documents/Literature_review.pdf
Columbia University Center for Career Education. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.careereducation.columbia.edu/
De Weert, E. (2011). Perspectives on higher education and labour market: Review of international policy developments. Retrieved from
        http://www.utwente.nl/mb/cheps/publications/Publications%202011/C11EW158%20Final%20version%20Themarapport%20onder
        wijs%20-%20arbeidsmarkt.pdf
Fasih, T. (2008).Linking education policy to labor market outcomes. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/
        Resources/278200-1099079877269/547664-1208379365576/DID_Labor_market_outcomes.pdf
Farooq, S. (2011).Mismatch between education and occupation: A case study of Pakistani graduates. The Pakistan Development
        Review, 50 (4).
Fung, D., & Wong, P.S.L. (2012). Using career education and career services to enhance employability: A case of the Hong Kong
        Polytechnic University. Asian Journal of Counselling, 19(1 & 2), 75–96. Retrieved from http://hkier.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/journal/wp-
        content/uploads/2012/12/ajc_v19n1-2_75-96.pdf
Hefferman, T., Feng, W., Angel, R., & Fang, Y. (2010).Employability and marketing education: Insights from the United Kingdom.
        Retrieved from
        http://www.anzmac.org/conference_archive/2010/pdf/anzmac10Final00140.pdf
Jackson, D. (2013). Student perceptions of the importance of employability skills provision in business undergraduate programs. Journal
        of Education for Business, 88(5), 271-279. Abstract retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0883 2323.2012.
        697928#.U90WdvmSyvM
Lowden, K., Hall, S., Elliot, D., & Lewin, J. (2011).Employers perceptions of the employability skills of new graduates. London: Edge
        Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.edge.co.uk/media/63412/employability_skills_as_pdf_-_final_online_version.pdf
Machin, S., & McNally, S. (2007).Tertiary education system and labour markets. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/innovation-
        education/38006954.pdf
Marryville University.(2013).The Office of Career and Professional Development. Retrieved From http://www.maryville.edu/studentlife/
        services-programs/career-education/
Silver, J.A.K. (2003, September). An evaluation of the employability skills acquired by industrial placement students. Paper presented
        Education in a Changing Environment. University of Salford. ISBN 0902896660
The Aspen Institute, College of Excellence Program. (2013). A guide for labor market data to improve student success. Retrieved from
        http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/upload/AspenGuideforUsingLaborMarketData.pdf
Top universities of Pakistan, HEC recognized universities, 2013. (2014) Retrieved from http://www.onlinetaleem.com/admissions/
        pakistan-universities-hec-ranking.html
Udofia, A. E., Ekpo, A. B., Nsa, S. O., & Akpan, E. O. (2012). Instructional variables and students’ acquisition of employable skills in
        vocational education in Nigerian technical colleges. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(14), 118-127.
        doi:10.5901/mjss.2012.v3n14p118
UNICEF. (2000, June).Defining quality in education. Paper presented by UNICEF at the meeting of The International Working Group on
        Education Florence. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/education/files/QualityEducation.PDF
Watts, T. (2012, September).Lifelong career development in an international perspective: Theory, policy and practice. Paper presented
        in International Networking Conference organized by the ch Foundation for Swiss Co-operation and held in Zurich.
Wendy, P. (2005). A postmodern approach to career education: What does it look like? Perspectives in Education, 23(2), 21-28.
Wheeler, A. (2010). Enhancing employability skills in environmental management students through learning innovation. Retrieved from
        http://resources.jorum.ac.uk/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10949/15473/Enhancing%20Employability%20Skills%20in%20Environmental
        %20Management%20Students.pdf?sequence=1
Wild, W., & Wood, J. (2013).Employability: Transferable skills ranked by students and recruiters. Learning and Teaching in Action, 9 (3),
        3-12. Retrieved from http://www.celt.mmu.ac. uk/ltia/Vol9Iss3/2_Wild.pdf
Zinser, R. (2003). Developing career and employability skills: A US case study. Education and Training, 45(7), 402-410.

                                                                  674
You can also read