REACH and the cosmetics industry - Alan Ritchie Senior Consultant Caleb Management Services Ltd 18 June 2008

Page created by Janice Wolfe
 
CONTINUE READING
REACH and the cosmetics
       industry
           Alan Ritchie
        Senior Consultant
  Caleb Management Services Ltd
          18 June 2008

                                  1
Summary of today’s
             presentation
•   Pre-registration, SIEFs and consortia
•   Downstream users
•   Testing
•   Commercial consequences of REACH
•   Relevant Caleb Experience

                                            2
Pre-registration, SIEFs and
             consortia
•   What is involved in pre-registration:
    – does the substance have to be registered
      (Annex IV and V exemptions, “naturals”);
      •   Annex IV - Exemptions from the obligation to
          register in accordance with article 2(7)(a)
          – List of specific substances
          – List not very logical
             » e.g. lauric (C12 linear fatty acid), and palmitic (C16
                 linear fatty acid) listed; myristic (C14 linear fatty
                 acid) is not…
             » Commission reviewing list
             » Updated list not ready for start of pre-registration –
                 may not be published before pre-registration ends
      •   Conclusion: if not listed: PRE-REGISTER!                       3
Pre-registration, SIEFs and
         consortia
– Annex V - Exemptions from the obligation to
  register in accordance with article 2(7)(b)
  •   Lists 9 categories: critical for cosmetics industry:
      8. Substances occurring in nature other than those listed under
         paragraph 7, if they are not chemically modified, unless they
         meet the criteria for classification as dangerous according to
         Directive 67/548/EEC.
  •   Natural not necessarily exempt:
      – Chemical processing (e.g. solvent extraction –
        INCLUDES e.g. SCFE)
      – Classified as dangerous

                                                                          4
Pre-registration, SIEFs and
             consortia
•   Difficulties:
    – Ambiguous CAS numbers;
      •   Substance characterised by different CAS
          numbers in different jurisdictions;
      •   No CAS registry entry
    – Does it qualify as “phase-in” or not;
      •   Must be on EINECS or non-listed NLP
          – But who owns the NLP if not listed?

                                                     5
Pre-registration, SIEFs and
         consortia
– Non EINECS listed products
  •   Notified?
  •   If not on EINECS and not notified, must be
      registered, but no benefits to pre-registration
  •   Maybe no SIEF required
– Reaction mixtures/substances of
  unknown/variable composition;
  1. Substance …chemical element and its compounds in the
     natural state or obtained by any manufacturing process,
     including any additive necessary to preserve its stability and
     any impurity deriving from the process used, but excluding
     any solvent which may be separated without affecting the
     stability of the substance or changing its composition;
                                                                      6
Pre-registration, SIEFs and
         consortia
– Why do some substances not have CAS
  numbers; what about notified substances?
  •   Notified substances deemed to be registered, but…
      such substances in a cosmetic formulation
      excluded from notified volumes under 67/548, but
      included under REACH

                                                      7
Pre-registration, SIEFs and
             consortia
•   How does a SIEF form;
    – How do I know who the other players are?
•   SIEFs/consortia:
    – What’s the difference?
      •   SIEFs are bound by REACH rules, but
          competition law takes precedence;
      •   Only EU legal entities (including ORs) can join
          SIEFs
      •   Consortia are legal entities
      •   Can commission testing and spend $
      •   Anyone can join – EU or not                       8

       Wh f                  ti   ?
Downstream users
•   What is a downstream user?
      •   Definition 13 … any natural or legal person
          established within the Community, other than the
          manufacturer or the importer, who uses a substance,
          either on its own or in a preparation, in the course of
          his industrial or professional activities.

•   When does a DU become a
    manufacturer/importer?
    – Changes where substance is bought
    – Meaning of “importer” under REACH
      •   Made overseas and brought into EU
                                                                    9
Downstream users
•       What are a DU’s responsibilities under
        REACH?
    Whereas 58:
    “In order to have a chain of responsibilities, downstream users should be
    responsible for assessing the risks arising from their uses of substances if
    those uses are not covered by a safety data sheet received from their
    suppliers, unless the downstream user concerned takes more protective
    measures than those recommended by his supplier or unless his supplier was
    not required to assess those risks or provide him with information on
    those risks. For the same reason, downstream users should manage the risks
    arising from their uses of substances…”

                                                                              10
Downstream users
•   What are a DU’s responsibilities under
    REACH?
    –   Reporting up the supply chain
    –   Confidentiality issues
    –   Exposure information
    –   Registered uses

                                             11
Testing
• Costs/tonnage band (worst case
  scenario 1) (per substance):
  1-10       10-100     100-1000     >1000
  tonnes     tonnes     tonnes       tonnes

  $80,357    $347,359   $1,754,326   $4,217,079

  €45,400    €196,100   €990,300     €2,380,500
1 Assuming no data available at all, no waivers
 exemptions or derogations, no read
 across/surrogate data
• Therefore: conduct an impact assessment!        12
Testing
•   Likely test gaps:
    – Likely to vary a lot from one substance and
      one company to another
    – Probable environmental gaps

                                                    13
Testing
•   How can certain tests be avoided?
    –   Polymers (but not NLPs)
    –   Not relevant/appropriate/not technically possible (e.g.
        granulometry for fluids)
    –   Not necessary due to exposure patterns (e.g. inhalation
        toxicity for substances only used in dermal preparations)
    –   Read across/surrogate data
    –   Grouping
    –   QSARs
    –   Available data for another endpoint makes test
        unnecessary
    –   Substance of low inherent stability (many tests can be
        waived if a substance is biodegradable)                 14
Testing
•   What about the Cosmetics Directive
    animal testing ban?
    – Are tests conducted for REACH applicable
    – French decision
    – Positive listing (preservatives, UV
      absorbers, pigments)
    – Other jurisdictions
    – Other applications
                                         ?
                                                 15
Commercial consequences of
             REACH
•   Registration costs (Standard)
Tonnage                                                   SMEs in
category          Individual Joint             SMEs       a SIEF
1 – 10 t             € 1,600          € 800      € 900       € 500
>10 t – 100 t        € 4,360         € 2,180    € 2,440     € 1,370
>100 t – 1000 t     € 11,500         € 5,925    € 6,630     € 3,715
>1000 t             € 31,000     € 16,080      € 18,000    € 10,080

                                                                    16
Commercial consequences of
                 REACH
 •        Registration costs (reduced)
          Medium        Medium        Small         Small         Micro         Micro
          Enterprise    Enterprise    Enterprise    Enterprise    Enterprise    Enterprise
          (Individual   (Joint        (Individual   (Joint        (Individual   (Joint
          Submission)   Submission)   Submission)   Submission)   Submission)   Submission)
1-10 t    € 1,120       € 840         € 640         € 480         € 160         € 120
10-
100 t     € 3,010       € 2,258       € 1,720       € 1,290       € 430         € 323
100 -
1000 t    € 8,050       € 6,038       € 4,600       € 3,450       € 1,150       € 863
>1000 t   € 21,700      € 16,275      € 12,400      € 9,300       € 3,100       € 2,325

                                                                                        17
Commercial consequences of
   REACH - Testing (recap)
• Costs/tonnage band (worst case scenario 1
  (per substance):
   1-10       10-100     100-1000     >1000
   tonnes     tonnes     tonnes       tonnes

   $80,357    $347,359   $1,754,326   $4,217,079

   €45,400    €196,100   €990,300     €2,380,500
1 Assuming no data available at all, no waivers
 exemptions or derogations, no read
 across/surrogate data
                                                   18
What are the big issues for the
        cosmetics industry?
•    Costs of data generation
•    Substances legally imported into EU as
     part of a cosmetics formulation but
     which do not qualify for phase-in status
     (e.g. not on EINECS)
•    The animal testing conundrum

                                                19
What are the big issues for the
        cosmetics industry?
•    Product availability issues:
    – Rationalisation;
    – Reformulation;
    – Preservative availability due to
      •   REACH
      •   BPD
      •   Other issues (endocrine effects, formaldehyde,
          sensitisation, costs of support with Cosmetics
          Annex listing required testing e.g. branch chain
          parabens)
                                                             20
Introduction to Caleb
    Management Services (1)
• Consultancy established in 1994 by Paul
  Ashford (MD) - have worked in chemical
  risk assessment since then
• Extensive experience in managing Task
  Forces and consortia for OECD SIDS and
  US HPV Challenge Programmes
• Five key personnel with chemical
  expertise and proven REACH experience

                                            21
Introduction to Caleb
    Management Services (2)
• Approved REACHReady Service Provider
• Contracted advisory roles with chemical
  trade associations (including complex
  product portfolios)
• REACH consortia are already emerging
  from these relationships
• Contracted as Only Representative to non-
  EU manufacturers
                                          22
Introduction to Caleb
    Management Services (3)
• Services offered:
  – REACH Training
  – REACH Impact Assessments
  – Consortium formation and management
  – Third Party representation
  – Only representative
  – Pre-registration and registration support
  – EU regulatory advice

                                                23
You can also read