Pulsar Timing and a Pulsar-Based Timescale
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Pulsar Timing and a P l Pulsar-Based B d TiTimescale l R N R. N. Manchester, Manchester GG. Hobbs Hobbs, M M. JJ. Keith & R. M. Shannon CSIRO A Astronomy and dSSpace S Science i Sydney Australia Summary • Basic pulsar properties and timing • Pulsar Timing Array (PTA) projects • A pulsar-based timescale – PT(PPTA2011)
Pulsars as Clocks • Pulsars u sa s aaree rotating o a g neutron eu o stars s a s formed o ed in supernova explosions • They emit beamed radiation which sweeps over the Earth, giving one pulse per rotation period • Millisecond pulsars (MSPs) are old neutron stars that have been “recycled” in a binary system • MSPs have much shorter periods and lower magnetic fields than young pulsars • Neutron stars are tiny (about 25 km across) but have a mass of about 1.4 times that of the Sun • Because of this large mass and small radius, their spin rates - and hence pulsar periods - are incredibly stable e.g., a few years ago, PSR J0437-4715 had a period of: 5.757451831072007 ± 0.000000000000008 ms • Although pulsar periods are very stable, stable they are not constant. constant Pulsars lose energy and slow down - typical slowdown rates are less than a microsecond per year
Measurement of pulsar periods • Start S observation b i at a known k i andd average 103 - 105 pulses time l to get mean pulse profile • Cross-correlate Cross correlate this with a standard template to give the arrival time at the telescope of a fiducial point on profile, usually the pulse peak – the pulse time-of-arrival (ToA) • Measure a series of ToAs over days – weeks – months – years • Transfer ToAs to an inertial frame - the Solar System barycentre • Compare barycentric ToAs with predicted values from a model for ppulsar - differences are called timingg residuals. • Fit the observed residuals with functions representing offsets in the model parameters (pulsar position, period, binary period etc.) • Fitted offsets used to improve the pulsar model
. The P – P Diagram Galactic Disk pulsars P = Pulsar period . P = dP/dt = slow-down rate . • For most ppulsars P ~ 10-15 . • MSPs have P smaller by about 5 orders of magnitude • Most MSPs are binary, but few normal pulsars are . • τc = P/(2P) ( ) is an indicator of pulsar age (and lifetime) • Surface dipole magnetic field . ~ (PP)1/2 MSPs have lifetimes of ~1010 years!
Sources of “Noise” in Timing Residuals ¾ Noise intrinsic to pulsar • Period fluctuations,, glitches g • Pulse shape changes ¾ Perturbations of the pulsar’s motion • Gravitational wave background • Globular Gl b l cluster l accelerations l i • Orbital perturbations – planets, 1st order Doppler, relativistic effects ¾ Propagation effects • Wind from binaryy companion p • Variations in interstellar dispersion • Scintillation effects ¾ Perturbations of the Earth’s motion • Gravitational Gra itational wave a e background backgro nd • Errors in the Solar-system ephemeris ¾ Clock errors • Timescale errors • Errors in time transfer ¾ Instrumental errors • Radio-frequency interference and receiver non-linearities • Digitisation Di iti ti artifacts tif t or errors • Calibration errors and signal processing artifacts and errors ¾ Receiver noise
The Double Pulsar: Post-Keplerian Effects R: Mass ratio . ω: periastron advance γ: gravitational redshift r & s: Shapiro delay . Pb: orbit bit decay d • Six measured parameters • Four independent tests • Fully consistent with general relativity (0.05%) (Kramer et al. 2006)
A Pulsar Timing Array (PTA) • With observations of many pulsars widely distributed on the sky can in principle detect a stochastic gravitational wave background • Gravitational waves passing over the pulsars are uncorrelated • Gravitational waves passing over Earth produce a correlated signal in the TOA residuals for all pulsars • Requires observations of ~20 MSPs over 5 – 10 years; could give th first the fi t direct di t detection d t ti off gravitational it ti l waves!! • A timing array can detect instabilities in terrestrial time standards – establish a pulsar timescale • Can improve knowledge of Solar system properties, e.g. masses and orbits of outer planets and asteroids Idea first discussed by Hellings & Downs (1983), Romani (1989) and Foster & Backer (1990)
¾ Clock errors All pulsars have the same TOA variations: monopole signature ¾ Solar-System ephemeris errors Dipole signature ¾ Gravitational waves Quadrupole signature Can separate p these effects p provided there is a sufficient number of widely distributed pulsars
Major Pulsar Timing Array Projects ¾ European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTA) • Radio telescopes at Westerbork, Effelsberg, Nancay, Jodrell Bank, (Cagliari) • Normally used separately, but can be combined for more sensitivity • High-quality data (rms residual < 2.5 μs) for 9 millisecond pulsars ¾ North American pulsar timing array (NANOGrav) • Data from Arecibo and Green Bank telescopes • High-quality data for 17 millisecond pulsars ¾ Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (PPTA) • Data from Parkes 64m radio telescope in Australia • High-quality data for 20 millisecond pulsars The three PTAs are collaborating to form the International Pulsar Timing Array (IPTA)
The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Collaboration ¾ CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, Sydney Dick Manchester, George Hobbs, Ryan Shannon, Mike Keith, Aidan Hotan, John Sarkissian, John Reynolds, Mike Kesteven, Warwick Wilson, Grant Hampson, Andrew Brown, Jonathan Khoo, Ankur Chaudhary, (Sarah Burke-Spolaor), (Russell Edwards) ¾ Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne Matthew Bailes, Willem van Straten, Ramesh Bhat, Stefan Oslowski, Jonathon Kocz, Andrew Jameson ¾ Monash University, Melbourne Yuri Levin ¾ University of Melbourne Vikram Ravi, (Stuart Wyithe) ¾ University of California, San Diego Bill Coles ¾ University of Texas, Brownsville (Rick Jenet) ¾ MPIfR, Bonn (David Champion), (Joris Verbiest), (KJ Lee) ¾ University of Sydney, Sydney Daniel Yardley ¾ Xinjiang Astronomical Observatory, Urumqi (Wenming Yan) ¾ Southwest University, Chongqing Xiaopeng You
The PPTA Project • Using U i ththe Parkes P k 64-m 64 radio di telescope t l att three th frequencies, f i 700 MHz, MH 1400 MHz and 3100 MHz, to observe 21 MSPs • Observations at 2 - 3 week intervals • Regular observations commenced in mid-2004 • Digital filterbanks and baseband recording systems used to remove dispersive delays • Database and processing pipeline - PSRCHIVE programs • Timing analysis - TEMPO2 • Studying detection algorithms for different types of GW sources (stochastic background, individual SMBHB, GW burst sources, etc.) • Simulating GW signals and studying implications for galaxy evolution models • Establishing a pulsar-based timescale and investigating Solar system properties • Using PPTA data sets to investigate individual pulsar properties, e.g., pulse polarisation, binary evolution, astrometry etc. www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/ppta
The PPTA Pulsars All (published) MSPs not in globular clusters
PSR J1909-3744 Timing • Pulse period 22.95 95 ms ms, Binary period 1.53 days • 10 cm (3 GHz) data, DM corrected • 1-year 1 span (22 ToAs) T A) • Fit for basic parameters Rms timing residual 39 ns! Best-ever rms timingg residual! • 6 yr data span (143 ToAs): • Rms residual 135 ns, reduced χ2 2.4 Long-term variations dominated by cubic term Need observations of many pulsars to identify the origin of these ese variations: v o s: PPTA and IPTA!
A Pulsar Timescale • Terrestrial time defined by a weighted average of cesium clocks at time centres around the world • Comparison of TAI with TT(BIPM2010) shows variations i i off many microseconds i d over 30 years • Revisions of TT(BIPM) show variations of ~50 ns • Pulsar timescale is not absolute, absolute but can reveal irregularities in TAI and other terrestrial timescales • Pulsar timing cannot detect linear or quadratic variations in atomic timescales • The best ppulsars have a 10-year y stabilityy (σz) comparable to TT(NIST) - TT(PTB) • Full PPTA/IPTA will define a pulsar timescale with precision of ~50 ns or better at ~monthly intervals
PT(PPTA2011) – Relative to TAI BIPM2011 - TAI First realisation of a pulsar timescale with (Hobbs et al. 2011, in prep.) accuracy comparable to atomic timescales!
Summary • Pulsars, Pulsars especially MSPs, MSPs are highly stable celestial clocks • PTA projects provide regularly sampled timing data for many MSPs over longg data spans p • Such datasets enable separation of the various perturbations of pulsars periods and isolation of variations in the reference atomic timescale • Millisecond pulsars have lifetimes of billions of years and will provide an effectively indefinite and continuous timescale • The pulsar timescale is based on completely different physics to atomic time and is independent of it. • Current C best b efforts ff have h a stability bili approaching hi that h off the h TT(BIPM) timescales • Work in progress – further improvement expected, expected for example, example by combining datasets to form the IPTA
Spin-Powered Pulsars: A Census • Currently 1984 known (published) pulsars • 1799 rotation-powered disk pulsars • 172 in binary systems • 238 millisecond pulsars • 141 in gglobular clusters • 8 X-ray isolated neutron stars • 16 AXP/SGR • 20 extra-galactic pulsars Data from ATNF Pulsar Catalogue, V1.43 (www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/psrcat) (Manchester et al. 2005)
Orbital Decay in Hulse-Taylor Binary Pulsar • Rapid orbital motion of two stars in PSR B1913+16 PSR B1913+16 generates gravitational Orbit Decay waves • Energy loss causes slow decrease of orbital period • Can C predict di t rate t off orbit bit decay d from f known orbital parameters and masses of the two stars using general relativity • Ratio R ti off measuredd value l tot predicted di t d value = 1.0013 ± 0.0021 ¾Confirmation of general relativity! ¾First observational evidence for gravitational waves! (Weisberg & Taylor 2005)
You can also read