Public Safety Realignment and Reentry - PREPARED BY: OFFICE OF REENTRY SERVICES (ORS)
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Public Safety Realignment and Reentry PR E PA R E D B Y: O FFI C E O F R E E N TRY S E RV I C ES ( O R S )
REPORTING PERIOD
Fiscal Year 2016
Quarter 1: Jul 2015 – Sep 2015
Quarter 2: Oct 2015 – Dec 2015
Quarter 3: Jan 2016 – Mar 2016
Quarter 4: Apr 2016 – Jun 2016
This report discusses:
• Realignment Population Demographics
• Re-arrests Occurring within the Realignment Population
• Reentry Service Linkage for AB109-funded ProgramsRealignment Populations PRCS: Post Release Community Supervision Non-serious felons released from prison into county probation supervision instead of state parole. Penal Code 1170(h): Felons sentenced to county jail Individuals sentenced under 1170(h) effectively serve their felony sentence in jail instead of prison, and can receive two types of sentences: Straight serve their entire sentence in jail custody and are released with no supervision. Mandatory Supervision (often referred to as split/blended) spend part of their sentence in custody and serve their remaining time in the community under intensive probation supervision.
Realignment Snapshot OCTOBER 2011 – JUNE 2016
AB109 By Calendar Year
RE-ENTRIES 585 1170(H) SPLIT/MS
1170(H) STRAIGHT
502 500 PRCS
453 Total
403
402 242 346 339
270 177 304 311 321 318
153 272
131 122 242 234
114 120 126 127
116
92
168 175 180 175 154
105
226
220 209 118 101
202 169 168 131 116 80 93 103 99 64
158 98 65
62
50 39 32 37 50
75 77 90 85 67
30 38 50 41 46 49 59 58 38 43 45 39 40
25
Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
n = 5,982
Over 5,980 individuals had re-entered the
community under Realignment as of June 30, 2016.
OCT 2011 - JUN 2016
*Data for the realignment population demographics was provided by Probation and ISD; using CJIC,
SHARKS, and Court databases.Distribution of Re-Entries
By Calendar Year
PRCS 1170(H) STRAIGHT 1170(H) SPLIT/MS
39% 38% 38% 36% 38% 39% 39% 40% 38%
43% 45% 42%
48% 48%
54% 53% 57% 57%
69%
27%
37% 37% 32% 26% 32%
50% 43% 36%
50% 52% 49% 30% 22% 18% 21%
44%
40%
27% 35%
24% 24% 28% 29% 25% 25% 26%
19% 21% 23% 22%
11% 10% 13% 14%
4% 6% 8%
QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
*Data for the realignment population demographics was provided by Probation, DOC, and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.
Population Distribution Over Time
Between October 2011 and June 2016, first-time AB109 re-entries into the county have declined
significantly across all 3 classifications. PRCS remains the most frequent type of AB109 reentry,
however, distribution of the AB109 population by classification has fluctuated.REALIGNMENT DEMOGRAPHICS
October 2011 - June 2016
Gender
Race/Ethnicity Age at Reentry
26% 16%
Other Male 65+ 25 - 34
18 - 24
Asian/Islander Female 1% 36%
13% 13%
Black 55 - 64
84%
White 5%
8%
51% 45 - 54
Hispanic
18% 35 - 44
2% 27%
The realignment population is majority Male, Hispanic, and High-Risk/Need
*Data for the realignment population demographics was provided by Probation, DOC, and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.REALIGNMENT DEMOGRAPHICS
October 2011 - June 2016
Initial Classification CAIS Risk Level
17%
NA
28%
1170(H) SPLIT/MS
46%
1170(H) STRAIGHT
High
PRCS
Moderate 52%
37% 13%
Low
7%
High Risk ~ 72%
*Data for the realignment population demographics was provided by Probation, DOC, and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.Supervision Caseloads AS OF JUNE 30, 2016
PRCS & MS START DATES
PRCS MS Total
75 78
70 71 72
64 63 61 63
FY16 MS PRCS Total 25 60
28 24 52
45 30 35
Q1 71 113 184 26 25 24 28 29
17 29
Q2 79 125 204
47 47 53
Q3 84 126 210 38 38 40 37 36 34
28 33
23
Q4 86 94 176
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Total 320 458 774
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
These figures reflect anybody starting a new Realignment supervision grant with
the Probation Department, including those who had reoffended and cycled
back.
*Data for Probation caseloads and re-arrests were provided by the Probation department, from the SHARKS and CJIC databases.AB109 PROBATION CASELOAD
PRCS MS Total
Caseload 991 (68%) 469 (32%) 1,460
As of June 30, 2016
n = 1,008 n = 465 n = 1,473
96 There were 1,460 AB109 clients on Probation’s
351 (20%) 447
(35%) (31%) Realignment caseload
PRCS was 68% of the caseload, MS was 32% of the
caseload
373
640 (80%) 1,460
(69%) 69% of AB109 cases were active, 31% had bench
(65%)
warrants
35% of PRCS clients had bench warrants, compared
PRCS MS Total to 20% for MS clients
Active Bench Warrant
*Data for Probation caseloads and re-arrests were provided by the Probation department, from the SHARKS and CJIC databases.CUSTODIAL ALTERNATIVE SUPERVISION
FY16 No. CASP Starts 18
17
15
Q1 28 12 12
13
10 10
Q2 23
6 6
5
Q3 32 4
Q4 45
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Total 128
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
CASP is an alternative supervision program established by the Sheriff’s Office.
Eligible individuals sentenced under 1170(h) are released from jail early and serve the remainder of
their sentence living in the community under close supervision.CUSTODIAL ALTERNATIVE SUPERVISION
CASP Outcome No. % Known Outcomes
Successful Completion 103 58% NLV Other
6% Failure
Ongoing (TBD) 37 21%
21%
Program Failure 16 9%
New Law Violation (NLV) - Felony 8 5%
Drug/Alcohol Test Failure 8 5%
Success
Technical/other 4 2% 73%
Absconded** 1 1%
Total 177 100% NLV = New Law Violation (Recidivism)Re-Arrests JULY 2015 – JUNE 2016
Re-Arrest Totals
4,375 4,322
During FY 2016: 2,289
1,571
1,326
AB109 Individuals Re-Arrested 1,785
755 718 598
No. of Rearrest Events 3,495 312
No. of Charges Issued 10,986 INDIVIDUALS RE-ARRESTS CHARGES
PRCS 1170 MS 1170 STRAIGHT
*Data for the realignment population re-arrests were provided by Probation and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.Re-Arrest Charges by Offense Level
By Classification All AB109
27%
2,807
PRCS 2,744 1,003
28%
25%
1170
3,099 1,026
STRAIGHT
7,180
37% 72%
1170 MS 1,337 778
MISD FELONY
Charge Total with Supervision Violation Charges Removed = 9,987Re-Arrest Charges by Category
3%
4%
5% DRUG/ALCOHOL
8% PROPERTY CRIME
OTHER MISC CHARGES
43%
8% OTH THEFT/FRAUD/FORGERY
TRAFFIC CRIME
WEAPONS
14%
FELONY AGAINST PEOPLE
MISD AGAINST PEOPLE
17%
Charge Total with Supervision Violation Charges Removed = 9,987
*Data for the realignment population re-arrests were provided by Probation and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.Charges by Category & Classification
n= 2,115 n= 4,125 n= 3,747 n= 9,987
2%
3%
3% 3% 3% MISD AGAINST PEOPLE
4% 5% 4%
5% 4% 5%
6%
6% 7% 8% FELONY AGAINST PEOPLE
10%
10% 9% 8%
6% WEAPONS CRIME
13% 14% 14%
14%
TRAFFIC CRIME
20% 17% 17%
15% THEFT/FRAUD/FORGERY
OTHER MISC CHARGES
41% 43% 42% 43% PROPERTY CRIMES
DRUG/ALCOHOL
1170 MS 1170 STRAIGHT PRCS ALL AB109
Data for the realignment population re-arrests were provided by Probation and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.Reentry Services JULY 2015 – JUNE 2016
Probation Contracted Services
Vocational Education Services
PROVIDER REFERRED ENROLLED Dom Violence Services 32 32
CC 29 68 Employment Workshops 14 11 25
CTC 440 103 Focus for Work 9 9
Total 469 171
Job Ready Job Placement 14 64
78
Vocational Education 7 91
98
Construction Green Focus 20 20
GED 10 35 45
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CC CTC
Data for Probation’s contracted VocEd and CBT service providers were provided by the Probation DepartmentProbation Contracted Services
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
191 clients enrolled in CBT during the reporting period, July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016.
78 clients successfully completed the program for this reporting period.
The majority of the referrals originated from PRCS.
This program is reported by FCS as being at 70% capacity and the clients have been fairly consistent in their
attendance
The program has demonstrated an 80% retention rate once the clients have completed their intake. However, it
is reported by FCS a 50% completion rate due to a few factors such as, new jobs, housing issues, family issues,
or re-arrests.
One of the main service gaps between initial referral and enrollment is making contact with clients in order to
follow up with a referral to the program, many clients cannot be reached.
384 Clients successfully completed since the program's inception in September 2011.
Data for Probation’s contracted VocEd and CBT service providers were provided by the Probation DepartmentSocial Benefits Enrollment (SSA)
Quarterly Enrollments
475
447
375
348 356
328 319 305
289
273 271
243
120
102 99 104
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
General Assistance Food Stamps (CF) Medi-Cal Any SSA Benefit
Data for social benefits applications and enrollments were provided by SSA, from the CalWIN database.Mental Health Services
Quarterly Enrollments
254 253
232 237
200
190
163 170
60
45 48 48
17 20 18 19 17 20 18 14
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Outpatient EPS Residential FQHC Any Service
*Data for Mental Health Services were provided by the Behavioral Health Department from the Unicare databaseSubstance Use Treatment Services
Quarterly SUTS Admissions
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 521
Reentry Clients Treated 1,057 350
321
Admissions (services) 1,684
237 243
AB109 Clients Identified 469 (44%) 166 169
138 135
101 113 114 102
Admitted Once 686 (65%) 76
55 71
Admitted Multiple Times 373 (35%)
Residential Outpatient Transitional Housing Any Service
*Data for Substance Use Treatment Services were provided from Behavioral Health Department’s Unicare databaseORS Contracted Services
FY
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2016
Education Services 0 7 12 3 22
Employment Services 32 40 21 20 113
Family Reunification Services 1 0 0 0 1
Health & Well-Being Services 0 16 10 16 42
Legal Services 8 14 3 8 33
The Office of Reentry Services contracts with community-based
organizations to provide education, employment, family reunification,
health & well-being, and legal services. AB 109 and non-AB 109 clients
are linked to services based on referrals from the Reentry Resource
Center partners.
* Data Sources: Contracted services from Office of Reentry Services, Office of Supportive Housing and Faith-Based Reentry Collaborative*Faith-Based Re-Entry Services
FY
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2016
Bible Way 7 21 8 12 48
Bridges of Hope 2 4 17 3 26
Good Samaritan 14 12 22 22 70
Mission Possible 12 10 16 14 52
The Faith-Based Reentry Collaborative consists of four faith-based reentry
centers which serve clients who are eligible for reentry services and partners
with the SCC Reentry Resource Center to increase the county’s capacity for
service-linkage.
The FBRC offers a variety of wrap-around services, centered around case
management and also provides one-touch referrals and services.
* Data Sources: Contracted services from Office of Reentry Services, Office of Supportive Housing and Faith-Based Reentry Collaborative*AB109 Rental Assistance Services
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
AB 109 Clients Subsidized 20 17 19 18
Add. Family Members Subsidized 19 13 11 11
Average Monthly Subsidy $1,003 $831 $740 $660
Highest Monthly Subsidy $2,175 $2,175 $1,649 $1,649
The Office of Supportive Housing’s (OSH) AB109 Rental Assistance
Program offers six months subsidized rent to AB109 clients, with
one additional six-month renewal for a maximum of one year of
rental support.
* Data Sources: Contracted services from Office of Reentry Services, Office of Supportive Housing and Faith-Based Reentry Collaborative*Emergency Housing Assistance
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Total Given Assistance 19 12 15 16
AB 109 Individuals Assisted 5 2 7 7
Given Motel Vouchers 12 6 9 7
Given Rental Assistance 7 6 6 9
Total Assistance Allocated $13,671 $11,877 $13,041 $17,005
Average Motel Voucher $1,221 $1,294 $1,460 $1,560
Average Rental Assistance $427 $686 $475 $424
The Office of Supportive Housing’s Emergency Assistance Program offers a
variety of one-time assistance to reentry clients; 3-month subsidy, back-rent
payment, security/utility deposits, and motel vouchers. Each client may receive up
to $2,000 in assistance.
* Data Sources: Contracted services from Office of Reentry Services, Office of Supportive Housing and Faith-Based Reentry Collaborative*Other Supportive Housing Services
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Prop 36 1-YR 1 2 2 0
Parole Special Needs 2-YR 1 0 0 1
Parole Special Needs 1-time 0 0 0 0
Rapid Re-Housing (families) 2 3 10 5
Community Reintegration North 12 5 1 0
Community Reintegration Central 29 0 1 0
Community Reintegration South 3 1 3 5
The Prop 36 and Parolee Special Needs (PSN) programs house individuals released from prison through
subsidized tenant-based rental assistance. Clients hold their own lease and pay part of the rent each
month. These programs also offer one-time assistance (OTA) for expenses similar to the EAP.
Rapid Re-Housing for Families and Children is a shelter program that houses families for up to 90 days
at a family shelter while a case manager works with them locate permanent housing and tackle other
obstacles such as employment.
Community Reintegration has three programs (North, Central, and South) which are housing programs
that utilize case management and partnerships between the County and the cities of Palo Alto, San
Jose, Morgan Hill, and Gilroy.
* Data Sources: Contracted services from Office of Reentry Services, Office of Supportive Housing and Faith-Based Reentry Collaborative*Supportive Housing Totals
Program Total Total
Start Date Referrals Housed
AB109 RAP Oct 2012 325 *86 (137)
EAP Feb 2014 276 247
RRHFC (Families) Jul 2014 73 30
P36 1-YR Jan 2014 16 14
P36 1-Time Jan 2014 30 16
PSN 2-YR Jul 2014 18 8
PSN 1-Time Jul 2014 5 3
* Data Sources: Contracted services from Office of Reentry Services, Office of Supportive Housing and Faith-Based Reentry Collaborative*Reentry Center Clients
JULY 2015 – JUNE 2016
4,648 UNIQUE CLIENTSClassification at Intake
37% of clients were AB109
25% of clients were Formal Probation
38% of clients were “other”
This suggests that just over 62% of visitors are eligible for
screening/assessment by behavioral health
* Data Source: ISD provided data from the IRTS database*Housing Status at Intake
27% of clients had permanent housing
50% of clients had temporary or transitional housing (THU, SLE, couch
surfing, etc.)
23% had no housing (shelter, car, streets, etc.)
This suggests that at least 73% of RRC clients have some level of need
housing at intake, and about 1/5th need immediate housing assistance, as
only 27% of clients report stable long-term housing at intake.
* Data Source: ISD provided data from the IRTS database*History of Homelessness
36% had never been homeless in the past
20% had been homeless once in the past
44% had been homeless more than once in the past
These numbers suggest that about 64% of clients had some history of
homelessness prior to their current situation at intake
* Data Source: ISD provided data from the IRTS database*Employment at Intake
63% were unemployed and looking
18% were unemployed and not looking
11% had full time employment
This suggests that at least 81% of RRC visitors need public benefits
at intake, and that at least 63% of clients could benefit from
employment services.
* Data Source: ISD provided data from the IRTS database*RRC Service Requests
Total Individuals
Requests Requesting
General Assistance 5,320 2,356
Food Stamps 4,550 2,306
Medical Mobile Unit 2,374 1,129
Drug/Alcohol Services 1,920 1,217
Healthcare 1,789 1,409
Housing 1,741 1,239
Peer Mentor Support 1,576 1,087
Clothing Assistance 1,518 1,071
ID Voucher 1,309 1,094
Employment 1,281 1,045
* Data Source: ISD provided data from the IRTS database*RRC Service Requests
FY16 Q4
A P R I L – JUNE 2 0 1 6 Requested Screened Referred/
Linked
Drug and Alcohol Services 401 284 233
Mental Health Services 249 126 99
Housing Services 338 127 127
* Data Source: ISD provided data from the IRTS database*QUESTIONS
You can also read
