MARITIME TOURISM IN THE ADRIATIC SEA AND THE 2020 THRESHOLD - Adriaeco
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
MARITIME TOURISM IN THE ADRIATIC SEA AND THE 2020 THRESHOLD
The 2019 edition of Adriatic Sea Tourism Report (ASTR) continues the series dedicated to analysis and
description of maritime tourism in the Adriatic Sea, with information and data updated every year since the
first edition (2013). This report provides in-depth quantitative and qualitative information on the three sectors
of maritime tourism in the Adriatic Sea: cruise, ferry and sail and yachting tourism.
This report is derived from information and data collected directly by Risposte Turismo, thanks to lengthy, in-
depth dialogue with several Adriatic stakeholders who collaborated. These stakeholders include ports and
marinas (individual and networks), passenger terminals, charter operators, navigation and tourism companies,
national institutes of statistics, tourism destinations, public administrations and tourism boards. ASTR also
contains the results of analysis, researches, studies of data and info regarding traffic, investments, demand,
supply, plans, strategies, priorities and obstacles within the maritime tourism sectors in the area.
The 2019 edition of the report – in addition to methodology and this introduction – maintains its chapter
structure, the ones focussing on the cruise, ferry and sail and yachting sectors. The edition includes graphs,
tables and maps and an examination of the movements of tourists by sea, directions, dimensions and
behaviours. As was the case with the previous Adriatic Sea Tourism Report, the final chapter has a special
focus. This year it concerns the Adriatic maritime tourism projects ongoing and recently approved. A double
ad-hoc survey of the nautical sector was conducted again this year in the first five months of 2019. It was
addressed to marinas and charter companies, and it highlights information relating to demand and supply
from a transnational viewpoint.
The Adriatic is an international space for which efforts are still required if it is to be fully recognised as a
brand and as a unique destination. Studies and analysis like this may contribute, but greater commitment both
from public and private operators is needed. The summary of data below should be sufficient to give an idea
of the unequivocal relevance that the Adriatic assumes in international geography and maritime tourism.
However, the overall results - even with an expected increase due to an overall positive outlook in 2019 - still
do not appear to be aligned with the potentials.
Maritime tourism in the Adriatic Sea in 2019 at a glance: Adriatic gates and routes
more than 30 cruise ports
5,16 million passenger movements
and 3127 cruise calls
more than 40 ferry ports
over 19 million passengers, 6 of them
travelling the international routes
332 structures
for boat tourism
more than 75,000 moorings
Source: Risposte Turismo (2019), Adriatic Sea Tourism Report.
MARITIME TOURISM MOVEMENTS MARKET CONCENTRATION
IN ADRIATIC COUNTRIES (PORTS TRAFFIC)
Cruise traffic by country, absolute values and share %, 2018 Concentration of cruise and ferry passenger movements
PORTS 2018 Share % on total in Adriatic ports, 2018
Country Pax. mov. Calls Pax. mov. Calls
ITALY* 2,420,333 978 46.9% 31.3% 58,7% 51,2%
CROATIA 1,300,845 1,180 25.2% 37.7% 15,0%
21,7%
GREECE* 737,479 415 14.3% 13.3%
MONTENEGRO 514,948 427 10.0% 13.7%
CRUISE FERRY
SLOVENIA 101,415 75 2.0% 2.4%
20,6% 15,6%
ALBANIA 84,815 52 1.6% 1.6%
BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
TOTAL 2018 5,159,835 3,127 100% 100% First 3 (4°5°) (6°-10°) Others
Note (*): both for Italy and Greece, only their Adriatic ports are considered.
ADRIATIC SEASONALITY
Ferry, hydrofoil and fast catamaran passenger movements Monthly share of cruise and ferry passenger movements and cruise
by country, absolute values and share %, 2018 and ferry calls of Adriatic cruise and ferry ports, 2018
PORTS 2018 Share % on total 25%
Cruise Pax. movements
Country Pax. mov. Calls Pax. mov. Calls Cruise calls
CROATIA 9,560,814 46,433 48.4% 50.9% Ferry pax movements 21,3%
20%
Ferry ship calls
GREECE ** 5,394,028 33,765 27.3% 37.0%
ITALY ** 3,292,455 7,302 16.7% 8.0% 15%
15,8%
ALBANIA 1,487,568 3,525 7.5% 3.9%
SLOVENIA 14,850 120 0.1% 0.1%
10%
MONTENEGRO n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA 0 0 0.0 0.0
5%
TOTAL 2018 19,749,715 91,145 100% 100%
Notes: Where not available, some values (pax. movements or calls) were estimated
with multi-year dataset trend; (*): for Italy only the Adriatic ports were considered, 0%
for Greece only Corfu, Igoumenitsa and Patras. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Values and shares of berths and structures in Adriatic by country, 2019 BOATING CLIENTS IN ADRIATIC
Berths Structures Avg. berths Distribution of the type of clients of the sample* of marinas,
value % share value % share per structure** 2014, 2017, 2018 and forecasts, 2019
ITALY* 49,186 65.5% 186 56.0% 264 100%
90%
CROATIA 17,459 23.3% 125 37.7% 140 80%
daily transits
(clients in daily
SLOVENIA 3,101 4.1% 8 2.4% 388 70% transit) in one year
MONTENEGRO 2,851 3.8% 8 2.4% 356 60% 79,2% 78,4% 78,2% 78,4%
50% resident seasonal
GREECE* 2,255 3.0% 4 1.2% 564 40%
customers
(summer)
ALBANIA 200 0.3% 1 0.3% 200 30%
20%
BOSNIA-H. 0 0.0% 0 0.0% n.a. 7,6% 7,6% 7,7% 7,9% resident customers
10% in one year (12
13,2% 14,0% 14,1% 13,7%
TOTAL 75,052 100% 332 100% 226 0% months)
2014 2017 2018 2019
Notes: (*) both for Italy and Greece, only their Adriatic ports were considered;
(**) the values are rounded either up or down to whole numbers.
Berths, structures and the average of berths The distribution of the itineraries chosen by the charter companies
per structure in the Adriatic areas, 2019 customers of the sample* among the 4 areas of the Adriatic Sea, 2019
Berths Structures Avg. berths
% share % share per structure
NORTH 57.7% 58.7% 222
CENTRE 19.5% 19.3% 229
SOUTH 22.8% 22.0% 234
100% 100% 226
Note: (*) the 2019 panel count on 49 marinas and 19 charter companies
2019 CRUISE FORECASTS Variations 2019 on 2018
Pax. mov. Calls % Pax. mov. % Calls Abs. Pax Abs. Calls
Venice 1,560,579 502 stable stable stable stable
Corfu
Dubrovnik
787,389
745,815
416
475
7.0%
1.8%
0.7%
8.4%
51,557
13,384
3
37 +7.3% on 2018
Kotor
Bari
Split
638,572
610,000
337,042
519
233
292
29.7%
6.5%
9.7%
26.3%
9.4%
12.3%
146,097
37,094
29,903
108
20
32
+7.2% on 2018
Notes: forecasts on passenger
Zadar 182,214 142 9.4% 6.8% 15,686 9 movements are based on 23 ports
Sarande 120,000 65 53.3% 54.8% 41,718 23 data (representing the 99.7% of the
Brindisi 110,000 45 5.3% -2.2% 5,572 -1 total passengers and 99.3% of cruise
Koper 102,400 69 1.0% -8.0% 985 -6 calls registered in 2018)
Trieste 100,000 63 7.7% 10.5% 7,152 6
Ancona 92,100 46 37.4% 15.0% 25,069 6
Rijeka 46,427 27 325.4% 145.5% 35,514 16
Bar 23,000 17 2.3% 6.6% 527 1
Sibenik 20,823 99 -41.7% -9.2% -14,906 -10
Korcula 16,363 95 -23.4% -23.4% -4,995 -29
Durres 13,100 20 100.5% 100.0% 6,567 10
Ravenna 11,720 34 -35.1% -2.9% -6,348 -1
Rovinj 11,388 60 0.0% -7.7% 0 -5
Pula 3,200 26 16.6% 0.0% 441 0
2019 FERRY FORECASTS
Half of the Adriatic ports provided forecast for Anyway, with the positive or negative
2019 but some of the major ports are missing: variations previously presented, and
this is the reason why it is difficult to make with several ports that foresee a certain
forecasts on the overall ferry traffic in the stability, it is reasonable to expect that
Adriatic. Moreover, this kind of traffic is highly this sector won’t register relevant
dependent on external factors, such as variation.
weather, petrol costs and travel alternatives.
Variations in clientele of interviewed marinas in Adriatic, 2018/2017 and 2019/2018
decrease decrease
11% 4%
increase increase
variation 32% forecasts 37%
stability 2018/2017 2019/2018
57% stability
59%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
homebased homebased
Domestic
(same country) regular transit regular transit Domestic
(same country)
occasional transit occasional transit
homebased homebased
International regular transit regular transit International
occasional transit occasional transit
Variations in clientele of interviewed charter companies in Adriatic, 2018/2017 and 2019/2018
decrease stability
23% 46% decrease
stability decrease
decrease 13%
62% 13%
8%
stability variation variation variation increase
variation
stability 12%
54% 2018/2017 increase 2019/2018 75% 2018/2017 2019/2018 increase
23% increase 25%
46%
CRUISE AND FERRY PASSENGERS BRINGS ECONOMIC BENEFITS Risposte Turismo estimates that the cruise tourists spent in 2018 more than 362 Million euro in Adriatic destinations, considering not only the 1.78 million cruisers that embarked or disembarked in one of the ports of the region but also the 3.356 million cruisers who visited other ports along their itineraries. This value does not take into account crew expenditures onshore (approximately an additional 14 Million euro over the year) and the impact of the extended cruise industry (ships, ports, suppliers, and so on). This is therefore an amount limited to the cruisers’ expenditures on shore. Risposte Turismo estimates that direct expenditures on shore by ferry passengers in the Adriatic and only on international routes reached 60 Million euro in 2018. Furthermore it should be considered that the entire ferry industry and tourism guarantees a much higher economic impact when other kinds of expenditures are considered (once again, for these industry, ships, ports, crews, suppliers and so on). Considering just the expenditures of tourists/passengers on shore moving through the two components of maritime tourism in Adriatic, cruise and ferry - accounted for more than 420 Million euro in 2018, but the economic impact of these two sectors (cruise & ferry) in the area is indeed much higher, considering the fact that tourists’ direct expenditures are just a part of the overall contribution to the Adriatic economy. EUROPEAN PROGRAMMES, PROJECTS AND THE ADRIATIC MARITIME TOURISM From the point of view of organizing and fostering the tourism supply side, our company believes that the Adriatic Sea merits yet more attention and commitment as one of the pillars of the ASF project as a whole. When the first Adriatic Sea Forum took place, the EU Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian region had not yet been adopted. However, in 2013 the Europe 2020 agenda, the 10-year plan, was already in effect and was used as a reference framework for all the activities at EU and national and regional levels. Approaching the end of the 2014-2020 programming period, EUSAIR Strategy hasn't had − and will not have − its own funds, but cooperation programmes of cooperation of the area funded and supported projects with activities and aims that are in line with EUSAIR activities and aims. Adriatic regions are eligible in many programmes: from the latest IPA CBC Italy-Albania-Montenegro and on to Italy-Croatia, Italy-Slovenia, ADRION or Interreg MED and others. In the Adriatic Sea Tourism Report 2019 itself, we analyse all these programmes, highlighting the more relevant projects for stakeholders operating in maritime tourism in Adriatic. The overall budget of all the selected projects is 19.5 million euro. This significant economic value should boost the three sectors and, more in general, the maritime tourism economy and jobs, if the expected objectives are achieved. The topics targeted by the approved projects are described in the full report. Some of these topics are as follows: cruise and ferry homeports integration for various modes of transport, especially regional airports in peak seasons; development of sustainable urban mobility plans and mitigation of the impact that cruise ships related traffic has on cities, to enhance the quality of life of inhabitants and passengers; development of a common model and plans for the enhancement of nautical tourism in 21 small and medium-sized ports; promotion of sustainable tourism and blue growth in the program area through turning the important maritime cultural heritage of 8 Adriatic Italian and Croatian ports to best account; the maritime production cluster (including the shipbuilding area), interaction gaps; and more sustainable and greener shipbuilding. The overall impression is that, even with concerted efforts on the part of the joint secretariats to attain higher cost efficiency (in particular, leakages in dissemination and promotion activities) and new networking opportunities, project partners differ in their views on priorities. Compared to the project aims, the activities carried out focus on narrow and local scopes and do not impact the framework in the mid-term.
You can also read
