MEDULLOBLASTOMA (PNET-Mb): Atypical clinical presentation

Page created by Roy Edwards
 
CONTINUE READING
1

            MEDULLOBLASTOMA (PNET-Mb):
              Atypical clinical presentation

                González Inés, Arburúas Macarena, Sgarbi Nicolás
                       Departament of Clinical Radiology
                               Hospital de Clínicas

ABSTRACT

Medulloblastoma is the most frequent primary brain tumor in children. It is located
in the posterior fossa and has a very unfavorable prognosis.
It is an aggressive tumor that seeds via CSF. It has both high dissemination rate
and high recurrence rate.
An early diagnosis is necessary in order to carry out an effective treatment that
can improve survival, although the survival rate itself is relatively poor
Magnetic resonance is the method of choice for diagnosis and follow-up, with an
excellent overall performance even if atypical clinical presentations do exist.
It is basic to remember a group of less frequent clinical features in these tumors:
location at the cerebellar hemispheres, superficial or even extra-axial topography,
signal of heterogeneous intensity in T1- and T2-weighted sequences, lack of
diffusion restriction and poor contrast enhancement or no enhancement.
Knowing these atypical clinical presentations is essential for early diagnosis, with
all it implies for the patient regarding treatment and prognosis.
The objective of this study is to review a group of 5 patients with a confirmed final
diagnosis of medulloblastoma whose MRI appearance on imaging studies
performed at our center was atypical.

KEY WORDS: brain tumors, medulloblastoma, PNET-MB, magnetic resonance.

INTRODUCTION                                  the incidence rates peak between the
                                              second and the fourth decades [2].
                                              Histological and molecular variety for
Medulloblastoma (PNET-Mb) is the              this tumor is of such magnitude that
most common malignant tumor of the            even if all PNET-Mb types belong to
central nervous system (CNS) in               grade IV of the WHO classification,
childhood, the second most frequent           risk and prognosis vary considerably
of all cancers in this age group and          according to type.
also the most common posterior                It is an aggressive tumor that shows
fossa tumor in children [1-7].                a high dissemination rate to the
It appears most frequently in males           cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (33% at the
below 10 years of age, while in adults

     §   ICONOGRAPHIC ESSAY /Dres. Gonzalez I., Arburuas M., Sgarbi N.       27
2

moment of diagnosis) and a high             Spectroscopy (MRS) and perfusion
recurrence rate [6].                        (PWI) are other useful MR
The most frequent location is the           sequences whose contributions are
cerebellum, the vermis in particular        currently being reviewed. Neither
[2, 4]; the tumor tends to spread to        technique offers specific data for
the cerebellar hemispheres in               diagnosis, but both are used as
adolescents and adults [6, 7].              complements to the conventional
Atypical forms usually occur in those       sequences, mainly to confirm
two age groups.                             diagnosis in doubtful cases.
In general, clinical illness is of short    It is essential to grade tumors with
duration (less than 3 months), which        precision; therefore it is mandatory to
reflects the aggressive behavior of         perform MR of the whole neural axis
this tumor.                                 to assess spread to the CSF and
The most common symptoms are                subsequent leptomeningeal seeding
headache, nausea and vomiting [6].          [6].
In classic magnetic resonance (MR)          Nowadays        different    PNET-Mb
the     image     is     that    of   a     subgroups are described, each with
heterogeneously contrast-enhanced           different histological and genomic
lesion of the cerebellar vermis, with       characteristics which are mainly
well-defined margins, of iso- or            reflected in their prognoses [8, 9].
hypointense signal in the T1-               These various subgroups also show
weighted       images         and     of    differential imaging characteristics,
hyperintense signal in the T2-              as we will see in the cases presented
weighted images, surrounded by              below.
vasogenic edema [2,6].                      Surgical resection, radiotherapy and
More than 40% of PNET-Mbs deviate           chemotherapy have decreased the
in some way from this classic pattern,      mortality associated to this tumor,
mainly when they occur in adult             with a 5-year survival rate of 50%-
patients.                                   80% [6, 7].
These tumors spread to the                  Prognosis is better for female
cerebellar hemispheres and their            patients aged 10 to 19, whose
aspect in T1- and T2-weighted               hemispheric lesions were completely
images changes: cystic zones                resected.
appear as a result of degeneration or       Both dissemination at the moment of
necrosis, there is no diffusion             diagnosis and recurrence remain the
restriction, enhancement is poor,           chief limiting factors for the cure [2,
hemorrhagic areas are noted, and            6].
margins become indistinct.                  The objective of this study is to
Diffusion-weighted sequences (DWI           review and highlight MR signs in a
sequences) nearly constantly show           group of atypical PNET-Mb patients.
intense restriction. Several authors
have considered this sign as very
characteristic and linked it to high
tumoral cellularity.
The more cellular a tumoral tissue
becomes, the more aggressive it is,
that is why the apparent diffusion
coefficient (ADC) can be used to
determine tumor grading [2, 4].

    28                            Rev. Imagenol. 2da Ep. Jul/Dic 2016 XX (1).
3

DESCRIPTION OF CASES                       Edema is also present. Figure 1
                                           In the DWI/ADC scans the lesion
CASE 1 (Figures 1 and 2)                   evidences      restriction.     After
22-year-old male.                          administering a contrast agent
Present illness: Pulsating headaches       moderate heterogeneous uptake is
for the last 2 months, drunken gait on     observed. Figure 2. The remaining
examination.                               neuraxis and the rest of the body
The MR scan shows a lesion of the          were scanned in order to complete
left cerebellar hemisphere that            grading, but no other lesions were
causes mass effect locally. It is a        found.
solid lesion, with hypointense signal      The surgeon decided to resect this
in    T1-weighted       images     and     process. A complete removal was
hyperintense signal in T2-weighted         performed and no complications
images; it includes inner cystic zones     ensued.
(*) and a central calcification (è).

    Figure 1: Sagittal T1 SE sequences, FSE T2-weighted images, FLAIR
    images, GRE T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted images and axial
    ADC map (see text for description).

     §   ICONOGRAPHIC ESSAY /Dres. Gonzalez I., Arburuas M., Sgarbi N.   29
4

           Figure 2: Axial and coronal SE T1-weighted sequences with
           fat saturation and gadolinium in both axial and coronal
           planes (see text for description).

The diagnosis was confirmed: it was      the last 2 weeks, Horizontal
a desmoplastic PNET-Mb of the SHH        nystagmus on examination.
subgroup. The patient did well, was      MR scan was performed and showed
discharged and is being followed up      a vermis lesion compressing the
by the oncologist.                       fourth    ventricle    as    well   as
Tumors of this group accounts for a      supratentorial hydrocephalus.
little less than 30% of the total        It was a solid-cystic lesion. The solid
number of these tumors. They occur       zones (*) appear as isointense
in children and young adults, with no    signals in T1-weighted sequences
gender predominance.                     and predominantly as hyperintense
                                         signals in T2-weighted sequences
                                         and FLAIR scans, with intense
CASE 2 (Figure 3)                        heterogeneous enhancement.
12-year-old female.                      No restriction was present in the
Present       illness:    Moderate       DWI/ADC scans.
headaches, mostly occipital, during      The peripheral cystic component
                                         shows a homogeneous content (è)
                                         and non-enhanced walls.

    30                         Rev. Imagenol. 2da Ep. Jul/Dic 2016 XX (1).
5

    Figure 3: Sagittal SE T1-weighted sequences, FSE T2-weighted images,
    FLAIR images, diffusion-weighted images, axial ADC map and post-
    gadolinium Fat-Sat SE T1-weighted images (see text for description).

Surgery was performed: partial             CASE 3 (Figures 4 and 5)
tumoral          resection       and       3-year-old male patient.
ventriculoperitoneal shunt,                Present       illness.     Irrepressible
The Pathology report confirmed the         vomiting during the last 4 days. Gait
diagnosis of anaplasic PNET-Mb             disorder on examination.
belonging to the Non-WNT/Non-SHH           The MR scan shows a cerebellar
Group 3. Two weeks after the               lesion located in the left hemisphere
operation follow-up MR was done            that compresses and displaces the
and showed that the tumoral process        fourth ventricle. It is mostly solid with
persisted with evidence of seeding in      hypointense signal in T1-weighted
the subarachnoid space, but with no        sequences and hyperintense signal
hydrocephalus.                             in T2-weighted sequences and
These tumors represent around 30%          FLAIR scans.
of     the     total    number     of      The      central        zone      shows
medulloblastomas, the rate of              hyperintense signal in the T2-
incidence being higher in male             weighted sequences. In the FLAIR
children. This group has the worst         scan the signal is suppressed
prognosis: 5-year survival rate of         indicating a small cystic area.
50%.

     §   ICONOGRAPHIC ESSAY /Dres. Gonzalez I., Arburuas M., Sgarbi N.     31
6

                                      Figure         4:
                                      Sagittal SE T1-
                                      weighted
                                      sequences;
                                      axial SE T1-
                                      weighted
                                      sequences,
                                      FSE           T2-
                                      weighted
                                      sequences and
                                      FLAIR images
                                      (see text for
                                      description).

                                      Figure         5:
                                      Diffusion-
                                      weighted
                                      images;     axial
                                      ADC map; axial
                                      and coronal fat-
                                      saturated post-
                                      gadolinium SE
                                      T1-weighted
                                      images      (see
                                      text          for
                                      description).

    32   Rev. Imagenol. 2da Ep. Jul/Dic 2016 XX (1).
7

In    the     DWI/ADC      sequences       Tumors in this group represent about
restriction is intense and there is no     10% of the total number of
enhancement with the contrast              medulloblastomas. They occur in
agent.                                     children or adults, with a slight
The patient underwent emergency            predominance of females.
surgery, which confirmed the               It is the group with the best
histopathological diagnosis of classic     prognosis: 5-year survival rate of
PNET-Mb of the WNT subgroup.               95%.

    Figure 6: Axial SE T1-weighted, FLAIR and FSE T2-weighted images;
    coronal FSE T2-weighted images; axial post-gadolinium SE T1-weighted
    images and axial diffusion-weighted images (see text for description).

     §   ICONOGRAPHIC ESSAY /Dres. Gonzalez I., Arburuas M., Sgarbi N.   33
8

CASE 4 (Figure 6)                           It had no restriction in DWI/ADC
20-year-old        female     patient.      scans and was not enhanced by the
Progressively intense headaches             contrast agent.
during the last month, with vomiting.       The patient underwent partial
No focal neurological signs, no fever.      resection. The diagnosis was
A cerebellar lesion, of paramedian          confirmed: it was a classic PNET-Mb,
vermian location, was observed in           a     Non-WNT/Non-SHH           lesion
the MR head scan. It appeared to be         belonging to group 4.
infiltrative, with a moderate local         Such lesions constitute the most
mass effect. This lesion was                important     molecular     subgroup,
hypointense in the T1-weighted              amounting to nearly 35%. They occur
sequences and hyperintense in both          most frequently in males and are rare
T2-weighted sequences and FLAIR             in adults.
scans.                                      Lack       of    enhancement         is
                                            characteristic. Prognosis is similar to
                                            that of group 3.

         Figure 7. Axial sequences: FSE T2-weighted, SE T1-weighted, FLAIR and
         diffusion-weighted. Axial ADC map. Post-gadolinium SE T1-weighted
         sequences. (see text for description).

    34                           Rev. Imagenol. 2da Ep. Jul/Dic 2016 XX (1).
9

CASE 5 (Figure 7)                          lack of diffusion restriction, poor
23-year-old female. No previous            enhancement and hemorrhagic
medical     history.  Had     intense      areas.
headaches and vertigo shortly before       Topography is one of the atypical
admission. No focal neurological           characteristics and in general relates
signs      on     examination.     An      to age. The older the patient, the
infratentorial lesion at the left          greater the tendency to spread
cerebellopontine angle stands out in       laterally       to      the     cerebellar
the MR scans. This mostly solid            hemispheres [6, 7].
lesion is hypointense in T1-weighted       Out of five cases, three were located
sequences, hyperintense in the T2-         in    the      hemispheres;        another
weighted ones and shows restriction        occupied the vermis as well as the
zones in the DWI/ADC scans. It has         left cerebellar hemisphere and only
a cystic center. Poor heterogeneous        one presented with the typical
enhancement is present.                    vermian location.
The patient underwent surgery and          The       most       frequent      atypical
the immediate outcome was good.            phenomenon to be observed was
Diagnosis was confirmed, it was a          cystic degeneration, which appeared
classic PNET-Mb, of the WNT                in four cases.
subgroup.                                  Restriction        is       a     frequent
As we have already seen, this type         manifestation in Mb, in spite of which
occurs more frequently in females          two of our cases lack restriction in the
and young adults.                          DWI/ADC scans.
                                           Mb        characteristically        shows
DISCUSSION                                 enhancement after injection of the
                                           contrast agent. In two of these five
We have presented a series of 5            cases gadolinium administration was
cases of medulloblastoma with              followed by poor enhancement or did
atypical findings in the MR scans.         not cause enhancement, all of which
Pathology results confirmed the            is rated as an atypical characteristic
diagnosis in all cases.                    in scientific literature.
Case       histories     match      with   In one case calcifications were
descriptions in published reports:         identified within the tumor, another
same        symptoms        (headache,     element in the spectrum of atypical
vomiting), all of them progressing         Mb characteristics.
rapidly which reflects the great           No case presented with hemorrhage.
aggressiveness of the tumor.               These        atypical        presentations
Two      of    the     patients    were    notwithstanding, in the series under
adolescents, an atypical age for           review MR permitted a diagnosis of
onset [2].                                 Mb, which confirms the overall good
The classic MR image of Mb was             performance of this method, no
observed in 60% of the scans.              matter what signs are present.
Atypical      manifestations       were
observed mainly in adults: lateral
spread       to      the      cerebellar
hemispheres, different behavior of
T1 and T2, cystic zones caused by
degeneration          or       necrosis,
calcifications, ill-defined borders,

     §   ICONOGRAPHIC ESSAY /Dres. Gonzalez I., Arburuas M., Sgarbi N.       35
10

CONCLUSIONS
                                           6. Koeller K., Rushing E. From the
                                              archives     of     the     AFIP:
In the series we have presented the           Medulloblastoma:                a
most frequently observed atypical             comprehensive      review    with
elements were different locations,            radiologic-pathologic correlation.
with lesions appearing in the                 Radiographics. 2003; 23:1613-
cerebellar hemispheres.                       37.
Other atypical findings in this series:
lack of restriction in DWI/ADC scans,      7. García Casales Z, Echebarría
presence of cysts and calcifications          Barona A, Urberuaga Pascual A
in the centre of the tumor, no                et al. Meduloblastoma: aspectos
enhancement after injection of                diferenciales entre el tumor
contrast agent.                               infantil y del adulto. Medicina
Diagnosis was made possible by                Clínica 2009; 133(12):454-459.
previous knowledge of the possibility
of these atypical characteristics,         8. Taylor MD, Northcott PA, et al.
correct     analysis     of    tumoral        Molecular     subgroups      of
semiology, clinical context and sense         medulloblastoma: the current
of frequency.                                 consensus.                Acta
                                              Neuropathologica 2012; 123 (4):
                                              465-472.
REFERENCES
                                           9. Ellison DW, Giangaspero F,
                                              Eberhart       CG      et     al.
1. Fisher J, Schwartzbaum J,                  Meduloblastomas,      genetically
   Wrensch M et al. Epidemiology              defined. Cap 8: Embryonal
   of brain tumors. Neurol Clin 2007;         tumours, pag: 188-193. En: WHO
   25(4):867-90.                              Classification of Tumours of the
                                              central nervous system. 4th
2. Martínez León M. Review and                edition, Lyon 2016.
   update about medulloblastoma in
   children.  Radiologia.    2011;
   53:134-45.

3. Dahll G. Medulloblastoma. J
   Child Neurol. 2009; 24:1418-30.

4. Adamski J, Ramaswamy V,
   Huang A, et al. Advances in
   managing medulloblastoma and
   intracranial  primitive neuro-
   ectodermal tumors. F1000Prime
   Reports 2014; 6:56-68.

5. Dipu B, Mrinal B, Pradipta
   RC.      The clinical profile and
   radiological     variations     of
   medulloblastoma. IJHS 2014; 4-
   31(11):22

 36                              Rev. Imagenol. 2da Ep. Jul/Dic 2016 XX (1).
You can also read