Liver Support Systems - Julie A. Thompson, MD Assistant Professor, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Medical Director, Liver Transplant ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Liver Support Systems Julie A. Thompson, MD Assistant Professor, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Medical Director, Liver Transplant Program
Disclosures • Principal investigator for U of M site, Vital Therapies • No other relevant disclosures • I will be discussing investigational devices
What are liver support systems 1. Mechanical devices: no cellular components – Albumin dialysis – Plasma exchange – Remove toxins by filtration and absorption 2. Bioartificial liver support systems: Contain cellular components – Remove toxins by filtration and absorption, along with performing biotransformation and synthetic functions of biochemically active hepatocytes Nyberg. Liver Transpl 2012
Why do we need liver support systems? • Acute liver failure: jaundice, encephalopathy and coagulopathy in a previously normal liver
The Failing Liver • Synthesis and clearance • When liver disease results in function below a critical level, a clinical syndrome develops • Result: toxin build up, coagulopathy, hemodynamic dysregulation, toxicity to other organs…MSOF
Fulminant hepatic failure • Acute liver failure: 2500 cases in the US per year, much higher worldwide • Common cause of death: cerebral edema and intracranial hypertension, leading to brain death
Fulminant hepatic failure treatment • Only one thing: liver transplantation • Majority of patients with acute liver failure will die without liver transplantation • One year outcomes in patients with ALF are poorer than for chronic liver diseases
Goals of liver support therapy • Prevent manifestations of liver failure • Bridge patients to liver transplantation or allow time for recovery of the native liver in order to avoid liver transplantation
A good liver assist device would… • Remove toxic substances – Currently this is possible without cellular material But, even so, no liver device that does this has been reliably shown to reduce mortality, therefore… • Provide temporary liver function – This requires use of cellular material
History of the concept • 50 years ago, it was shown that intact parenchyma/liver homogenate was capable or ureagenesis and other functions • Hepatocytes from various sources have since been used to create a bioartificial liver Kimoto. ASAIO J. 1959
As of 2003 • 2003 review – 12 randomized trials • 10 ALF + acute-on-chronic, 2 ALF – 483 patients • Suggestion of survival benefit on acute on chronic, but not in ALF • Improved hepatic encephalopathy • Trend toward successful bridging to transplantation Kjaergard et al. JAMA 2003.
50 years ago, yet not ready • Complexity • Difficulty in obtaining and maintaining hepatocytes in a differentiated state • $$$$$$$$$
Where we are now: Options • Mechanical options • Cell-based options
Where we are now: Options • Mechanical options – Plasma exchange – Albumin dialysis • Cell-based options Stange. Organogenesis 2011.
Technology Albumin: Human Plasma Protein Carrying Toxins - to the Liver -which detoxifies for further elimination
Mechanism of Toxin Removal in the Liver
Mechanism of Toxin Removal in the Liver
Liver Blood Vessels („Sinosoids“)
Inside a sinusoidal vessel: Hepatocytes Erythrocytes stay in blood Albumin enters „pores“ „porous“ endothelial layer
Albumin loaded with TOXINS
Processed Toxins drained into Bile „Ductuli“ Detoxification Enzymes „detoxify“ „cleaned“ Albumin re-enters Albumin loaded with Blood Circulation with free Binding Sites to bring more Toxin TOXINS
In Liver Failure: Detoxification Enzymes „broken“ Albumin loaded with TOXINS
In Liver Failure: Liver cell can not take toxins
In Liver Failure: Albumin remains uncleaned and accumulates Toxins
In Liver Failure: Toxin overloaded Albumin is not equipped with Binding Sites anymore to take more Toxins
In Liver Failure: Toxin overloaded Albumin is not equipped with Binding Sites anymore to take more Toxins
Small fatty acids Metabolites of aromatic amino acids Metabolites of tryptophane Bilirubin Nitric Oxide Vasoactive Substances Shock Renal Failure Liver Coma Inhibit Regeneration and Recovery
Hemodialyis removes smaller Molecules by Filtration and Diffusion Albumin bound toxins can not pass, Albumin keeps them In Blood
“Liver Dialysis” • The only FDA approved extracorporeal therapy approved: albumin dialysis (molecular absorbents recirculating system [MARS]) for treatment of drug overdose and toxicity • Dialysis: – the separation of particles in a liquid on the basis of differences in their ability to pass through a membrane – the clinical purification of blood by dialysis, as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney
What they’re used for • Have been used primarily for ALF but also used to support patients with sudden decompensation in underlying liver disease/ established cirrhosis (so-called “acute on chronic liver failure”)
Mechanical Options • Fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (FPSA): first used in 2003 • Extracorporeal albumin dialysis (ECAD, MARS): first clinical trial in 1999 • How they’re different: – membrane pore size (FPSA bigger) – Flow rate (FPSA faster) – FPSA appears to be more effective than ECAD – FPSA has more complications from coagulopathy
Mechanical devices: efficacy • Efficacy: suggestion of benefit in the sickest patients • Approved for drug overdose and poisoning • MARS has also been used for treatment of intractable pruritus (not FDA approved)
Albumin Dialysis (MARS)
MARS-Therapy uses specific dialysis membranes with active adsorption capacity for bound toxins
MARS-Therapy uses specific dialysis membranes with active adsorption capacity for bound toxins
MARS-Therapy uses specific dialysis membranes with active adsorption capacity for bound toxins
Toxins intermediately stored on membrane are finally taken over by engineered proteins in the dialysate
Toxins intermediately stored on membrane are finally taken over by engineered proteins in the dialysate
Clinical Evidence for MARS in Liver Failure • Improves hemodynamics • Small RCT slightly • Improves kidney function • Small RCT • Improves progressive • Small RCT jaundice • Improves hepatic coma • FDA controlled multi- center RCT • Improves pruritus • 80% success in intractable patients Survival?
Where we are now: Options • Mechanical options • Cell-based options
Cell-based Bioartificial Options • Provide blood purification through dialysis • Provide hepatocyte-specific functions that are lost in ALF – Protein synthesis – Ureogenesis – Glucogenesis detoxification
Cell-based Options: Human Cells • Primary human hepatocyte limitations – limited in vitro regeneration • Solution: use of hepatoblastoma cells (but..decreased metabolic profiles…) – decreased function in culture due to loss of gap junctions • Solution: attach the cells to a matrix to simulate cell- cell interaction
Cell-based options: Porcine cells • Maintain higher differentiation and metabolism • Better ammonia detoxification • More available • Limitation: concern about xenozoonosis (although no cases have been reported)
Cell-based Devices • More than 30 devices have been reported since 1987 • More than 14 systems have undergone clinical trials • More than 400 patients treated • None have obtained FDA approval
Cell-based Devices: HepatAssist • First liver assist device tested on a large scale • Hollow-fiber extracoporeal bioreactor • 7 billion cryopreserved porcine hepatocytes • Human cells separated from porcine cells by a membrane (pore size 0.15 microm) • Animal studies and phase 1 trial promising results By Circe
HepatAssist • Large multicenter randomized phase 3 trial with fulminant/subfulminant liver failure and primary nonfunction (PNF) after LT • 171 patients, 20 sites. 85 treated • Demonstrated safety, but no improvement in 30- day survival in overall population • Survival benefit in the fulminant/subfulminant group • Patients with known cause of FHF had the best survival with the bioartificial liver (not including PNF) Demetriou et al. Ann Surg 2004.
HepatAssist Survival All patients, P=0.1 FDA: Not approved due to missing primary end-Patients with known cause of point FHF, P
Cell-based Devices: ELAD (Extracorporeal Liver Assist Device) • Largest clinical experience • Made by Vital Therapies • Uses multiple hollow-fiber cartridges loaded with human hepatoblastoma cell line
ELAD Bioartificial Liver Support System • Selective plasmafiltration into a bioreactor containing appr. 500 g C3A human hepatoma cells • Cells metabolize small molecules • Cells provide active p450 detoxification system • Cells secret numerous proteins, such as albumin, acute phase response proteins, growth factors
Goals of ELAD To provide liver functions in order to support patients failing liver Thereby improving/delaying/preventing secondary organ failure Thereby buying time for the patient‘s liver to recover from failure/decompensation by regeneration/resolution of precipitating events
By removing Toxins Liver Support cleans albumin Create new Binding Sites with: cleaned Patient ALBUMIN ALBUMIN cleaned ALBUMIN …Inside a blood vessel…
ELAD • Combines conventional hemodialysis with filtration through 4 cartridges • Multiple clinical trials • Largest at a United Nations hospital in Beijing – Transplant-free survival at 28 days • Treated: 84.1% • Untreated 50.2% Duan et al. Hepatology 2007
ELAD Interim Survival Data Series 1 90 80 Transplant-free survival, % 70 60 ELAD 50 Control 40 ELAD 30 Control 20 10 0 ELAD Control ELAD Control 28 days 84 days
ELAD Trials at the University of Minnesota • Ongoing for alcoholic hepatitis • Will open shortly for fulminant hepatic failure • If you have a patient with alcoholic hepatitis and want to know if s/he qualifies, please contact me thom0235@umn.edu
Summary • There have been notable achievements in artificial and bioartificial liver devices • Limited supply of hepatocytes is still a problem • Long term safety, tolerability and efficacy is not yet established • I think we will get there…
You can also read