Learning Management System Projects The good the bad and the unexpected - ALISON BICKFORD DIRECTOR, CONNECT THINKING 2018 - Local ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Learning Management System Projects The good…the bad…and the unexpected ALISON BICKFORD DIRECTOR, CONNECT THINKING 2018
Outline • how to identify your needs • how to select an appropriate system – questions to ask, issues to think about • how to maximise the value from your existing system (if you are stuck with what you have) • how to present a business case for change? © CONNECT THINKING 2018 2
1. We don’t have a LMS. Our driver is compliance. 2. We have a LMS and we need to do more with it. 3. We need a LMS that will support Professional Development courses. © CONNECT THINKING 2018 4
What makes a LMS project successful? Vendor is LMS features engaged in meet business meeting the requirements business objectives Internal systems and processes are mature © CONNECT THINKING 2018 5
What are the risks for this project? • Requirements are inadequately defined • Assumptions are made about end user workflow and adoption • Lack of experience thinking like an IT project manager: ◦ Processes ◦ Governance ◦ Security • Insufficient budget – operational and capital • Insufficient internal support and resources • Insufficient market testing: ◦ What does ‘good’ look like? ◦ What will future-proof success? • Content strategy is not in place © CONNECT THINKING 2018 8
What are the benefits of this project? • Compliance • Reporting • Cost v’s Savings are measureable • New learning offerings • Visibility and democratisation of content • Content delivery – anytime/anyplace/any device • Revenue streams © CONNECT THINKING 2018 10
Tips for implementation • Prepare user stories and wireframes • Have an executive sponsor onboard who understands • Check procurement rules • Get sponsorship from IT – and walk the walk • Have a contingency budget • Get your catalogue ready • Get your hierarchy ready • Weigh up integration pros and cons • Plan change and comms, including advisory groups • Implement a steering committee and governance © CONNECT THINKING 2018 11
2. We have a LMS and need to do more with it © CONNECT THINKING 2018 12
What causes this situation? © CONNECT THINKING 2018 13
What causes this situation? • Lack of a phased LMS strategy ◦ Including manager engagement • LMS fatigue • Lack of continuous improvement practices • Lack of general IT strategy maturation • Lack of resources, resources move on • Poor vendor relationship • Inadequate LMS © CONNECT THINKING 2018 14
Steps to maturing the LMS 1. Get clear on what you want your LMS to do: ◦ Investigate end user workflows and level of IT comfort ◦ Ensure the content strategy is clear ◦ Create user stories, wireframes and process maps to develop a shared ‘mental model’ 2. Bring your vendor into the conversation 3. Develop a scope of works (SOW) 4. Secure a budget 5. Develop in a test environment © CONNECT THINKING 2018 15
3. We need a LMS that will support Professional Development courses © CONNECT THINKING 2018 16
What’s the difference? Compliance LMS Professional Development LMS Focus is on ‘ticking the box’: Focus is on real-life projects, reflection, life-long learning skills: • Single SCORM courses & • Courses over several weeks recertification • Multiple learning modes • “I have read and am willing to • Project-based/Work-based comply with…” policy tracking • Facilitator enabled • Workplace assessment ➢ Self-directed, individual learning ➢ Self-directed AND social learning © CONNECT THINKING 2018 17
LMS are not the same… © CONNECT THINKING 2018 18
LMS are not the same… LMS generally are good at… LMS are generally poor at… • SCORM courses • Complex learning pathways • Enrolments • Courses with a mix of self-paced, small group work and events • Recertifications • Large events, such as conferences • Simple assessments • Complex assessments • Simple badging (awards) • Facilitator and assessor workflows • Simple alerts • Minor learning object updates • Simple reports • Reports that include optional activities • Searchability • Predictive analytics IT framework generally requires rebuilding every 3-5 yrs © CONNECT THINKING 2018 19
In summary…. © CONNECT THINKING 2018 20
How to identify needs? Accept the entire procurement process will be an education process 1. Gather what’s in the ‘mind’s eye’ of your stakeholders: ◦ User stories, from multiple perspectives ◦ Process maps ◦ Wireframes 2. Have vendors present within the context of the user stories 3. Google “LMS requirements” to get a list to leverage from 4. Have vendors satisfy the critical requirements up front, such as IT security and WCAG accessibility 5. Run a ‘Proof of Concept’ BEFORE signing a contract © CONNECT THINKING 2018 21
How to select an appropriate system 1. Run a formal procurement process, with formal scoring 2. Get advice on the appropriateness of the solution architecture, including security 3. Reference check with like organisations and like implementation requirements 4. Run a Proof of Concept 5. Monitor responsiveness – set up service levels/KPIs as part of the contract 6. Listen and look © CONNECT THINKING 2018 22
Mandatory requirements “Go/No Go” • Meets IT Security & Privacy requirements • WCAG 2.0 AA compliant • Responsive design • Vendor has formal QA processes in place • Infrastructure, security and platform enhancements are routinely updated or ‘pushed out’ • Vendor willingly provides 2nd level support © CONNECT THINKING 2018 23
Example BAU service levels Prio Definition Example Response Resolution Escalation Penalty rity target target (consequence) 1 Critical [add] 15min 4hrs [whom] Affects multiple users or security 2 High [add] 30min 8hrs [whom] Affects data integrity or impedes completion e.g. SCORM not completing 3 Medium [add] 2hrs 3 business [whom] Configuration issues that days affects only a small sub- group of people, important configuration updates 4 Low [add] 1 day 10 [whom] Small configuration business updates or improvements, days business enquiries © CONNECT THINKING 2018 24
How to present a business case for change 1. Gather the evidence: ◦ Helpdesk tickets ◦ IT advice ◦ In-field stories ◦ Site inspect other organisation solutions ◦ Market test LMS evolutions ◦ Quantify the pain – direct and indirect costs 2. Ensure you can answer these questions: ◦ What is it a good idea? (base your response on facts) ◦ What’s the business benefit if you deliver the change? ◦ What’s the business loss if the change is not delivered? ◦ How will you know the change was successful? © CONNECT THINKING 2018 25
What makes a LMS project successful? Vendor is LMS features engaged in meet business meeting the requirements business objectives Internal systems and processes are mature © CONNECT THINKING 2018 26
Any final questions? © CONNECT THINKING 2018 27
Thank you Alison Bickford www.connectthinking.com.au alison@connectthinking.com.au M 0417 252 960 © CONNECT THINKING 2018 28
You can also read