Landscape of Environmental & Social Performance Disclosure and Reporting: for Institutional Investors targeting India
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Working Paper Summary Working Paper Summary Landscape of Environmental & Social Performance Disclosure and Reporting: for Institutional Investors targeting India Part of a study being carried out to identify investor interest for consolidating behind a common standard for capturing environmental and social performance and determining policy linkages to drive its adoption Study lead
Working Paper Summary Acknowledgments The authors of the report would like to extend gratitude The authors would like to acknowledge experts from the following to the following people, who have contributed to the organizations for their inputs to the study through interviews progress of the study with their expertise and guidance Development Financial Institutions Asset Managers and have reviewed the landscape paper • CDC Group • ING Investment Management (India) • Financierings-Maatschappij voor • Kotak Group Padmini Srinivasan CCGC, IIM Bangalore Ontwikkelingslanden (FMO) • LGT Capital Management Vasanthi Srinivasan CCGC, IIM Bangalore • International Finance Corporation • Morgan Stanley Investment Management PD Jose CCGC, IIM Bangalore • Infrastructure Development Finance • Nomura Capital Ritu Kumar Actis Company • Taurus Mutual Fund Ben Thornley Pacific Community Ventures • Infrastructure Leasing & Financial • SNS Asset Management Sarah Gelfand Global Impact Investing Network Services Banks • Small Industries Development Bank of • Rabo India Finance Margot Brandenburg Rockefeller Foundation India (SIDBI) • Yes Bank Justina Lai Rockefeller Foundation Pension Funds Other Stakeholders California State Teachers’ Retirement • Carleton Centre for Community Innovation System • Council of Institutional Investors For additional information, please contact Private Equity / Venture Capital • GS Sustain • Aavishkaar Venture Management • Harvard Business Research centre skapur@cKinetics.com Services • IDFC Foundation +91.11.4050.7277 • Actis • IFMR trust • Acumen Fund • Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of • Aloe Private Equity India • Barings Private Equity • International Corporate Governance • BTS Investment Advisors Network • Lok Capital • ING Investment Management • Nalanda Capital • National Stock Exchange of India • Rianta Capital • Responsible Investment Research The study is led by cKinetics and supported by the • Tata Capital Association Rockefeller Foundation. In addition to investors, it engages Asset Managers • Social Stock Exchange Asia key stakeholders such as Centre for Corporate Governance • Blue Orchard Finance • UN Principles for Responsible Investment and Citizenship (CCGC) at Indian Institute of Management • BNP Paribas Asset Management • Vigeo • Canara Robeco Asset Management (IIM) Bangalore, Small Industries Development Bank of • HSBC Global Banking and Markets (Equity India (SIDBI) and the National Stock Exchange of India Research) (NSE). • ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company
Working Paper Summary This summary surveys the landscape impacting E&S reporting in India; to inform investors seeking to converge behind a standardization of E&S • Globally and in India, institutional investors are increasingly aware of the impact that E&S (Environmental and Social) factors have on valuations of their portfolio companies. • Simultaneously, initiatives by the government, and other stakeholders are aiming to drive measurement and disclosure on E&S issues by businesses and investors. • In this backdrop, this document summarizes the landscape for E&S reporting in India; to identify complementarities and gaps that exists and how it is conducive for investors to seek a standardized E&S framework. – The complete landscape document is available at: www.cKinetics.com/CrackingTheConundrum Questions this document answers for investors looking for standardized E&S information: Why What Which • Why is E&S relevant for • What are the guidelines, • Which disclosure and reporting different kinds of investors principles and frameworks for approaches are being used by investors to integrate E&S finance+ investors to meet issues into operations their goals of integration Understanding the landscape will help investors determine whether reasons exists to standardize E&S reporting frameworks (just like standard financial reporting exists)
Working Paper Summary The landscape finds that the present time is opportune for finance+ investors to drive standardization in E&S reporting frameworks The timing is opportune for Investors to drive Investors, which incorporate non-financial metrics a standardized E&S disclosure framework in into their decision making process are referred to as India for 2 reasons: finance+ investors. It incorporates ‘Sustainable investors’, ‘Responsible investors’, or ‘Impact investors’ etc. Finance+ in India need E&S information and have similar interest in their need and use of Number and role of financial metrics in decisions this information Number of Impact and Non-financial metrics taken into + Mainstream investing Indian Government and global initiatives are looking to promote responsible business actions & reporting consideration Sustainable Investing and Responsible Investing Impact Investing Finance+ Investing
Working Paper Summary We first look at the investor Finance+ investors that are increasingly present in drivers for E&S India need E&S information Standardization + Indian government and global initiatives are looking to promote responsible business actions & reporting
Working Paper Summary To begin with a variety of drivers were identified to make E&S factors relevant to investors… • We examined the drivers of more than 60 investors across the following groups: Investor 1. Banks: Both Indian as well as Global banks with Reputation presence in India Investor's Operational 2. Development Finance Institutions (DFI’s): again philosophy risk both Indian and Global 3. Mutual Funds, which fell in 4 categories: • Indian Signatory to • Global MFs with physical presence in India global E&S drivers New product investor for investors development • Global E&S funds investing in India initiatives • Global funds investing in India 4. Private Equity GP's across 3 categories: Mandate from Marketing to • E&S seeking investors shareholders/ retail retail investors / • ‘Social Investors’ investors/LP's LP's • Rest of the PE funds Regulatory compliance 5. Pension Funds across 3 groups: • Indian • Global Private Pension Funds • Global Public Pension Funds Drivers of all 14 investor types mapped to the 8 drivers
Working Paper Summary … and compared the magnitude of the drivers across the 14 investor types; to find 5 types that have the most to gain from E&S reporting Global E&S funds targeting India, DFIs (both India and Global), PE investors seeking E&S and Social Investors are 5 types of investors that benefit most from E&S information availability. We refer to them collectively as Finance+ investors in this document.
Working Paper Summary The Finance+ investors evaluate their portfolio and target companies on 8 E&S parameters • All benefits that accrue to an investment because it is incorporating E&S related measures fall into one of the following eight parameters Investee reputation and social license to operate International Regulatory consumer pull compliance Ability to Lenses New product, attract capital investors use industries and and better for their markets valuation portfolio including BoP Attract and Feedstock retain human reliability capital Better resource management These become the E&S areas that finance+ investors will seek to build uniform understanding on Detailed descriptions can be found in the complete Landscape document
Working Paper Summary 4 benefits of standardized E&S disclosure by companies were identified, which contribute to the investor appetite to drive standardization • Comparability of information between companies and also in companies over time, which would lead to the following benefits: 1. Lowers cost of information collection, which would be true both while making investments as well as for ongoing monitoring. 2. Identify larger pool of target/ investible companies, which will especially be true of investors limited in their focus by their own philosophies or mandates by LP’s and Government. 3. Develop new investment products: In order to develop new financial products related to sustainability, investors require the relevant E&S data. • Mission enhancement 4. There are certain Investors who are mandated by their own ethos or through their stakeholders (limited partners, government, etc) to create a positive environmental and social impact via their investments. For them promoting standardized disclosure of E&S information enables them to meet their missions. It is important to note that, here we are examining the benefits accruing by ‘standardization of E&S’ and not benefits of E&S (which were highlighted earlier).
Working Paper Summary … and here too found the finance+ investors having the most to gain from standardization of E&S reporting Benefits of standardizing reporting on E&S data in portfolio companies by investors Low cost of info Identifying larger New product Mission collection pool of investible development enhancement companies Indian Low Medium Low Low Banks Global Banks with presence in India Medium Medium Low Low Indian* Medium Medium Low Low DFI’s Global* Medium High Low Low Indian Low Low Low Low Global MFs with physical presence in Medium Low Low Low Mutual Funds India Global E&S funds investing in India* High High Medium Medium Global funds investing in India Medium Medium Low Low E&S seeking investors* High High Low Low Private Equity ‘Social Investors’* High Low Low Low GP’s Rest of the PE funds Low Low Low Low Indian Medium Low Low Low Pension Global Private Pension Funds Medium Medium Low Low Funds Global Public Pension Funds Medium High Low Low Low Low benefit for the investor to promote standardized E&S disclosure in the short term Med Medium benefit for the investor to promote standardized E&S disclosure in the short term High High benefit for the investor to promote standardized E&S disclosure in the short term * Indicates the Finance+ investors Source: cKinetics interviews and analysis
Working Paper Summary Finance+ investors that are increasingly present in India need E&S information + We now look at the Indian Indian government and global initiatives are Government’s and stakeholder looking to promote responsible business actions & led drivers for E&S reporting Standardization in India
Working Paper Summary 9 State and non-state driven initiatives promoting E&S disclosure and reporting that cut across sectors were examined… State (Government of India) driven initiative and policies Non state driven initiatives Existing Recent On the horizon Multi-stakeholder Investor driven driven •Energy conservation •National Voluntary Guideline on •Institute of •Global Reporting •Carbon Disclosure disclosure (Section 217 Social, Environmental and Chartered Initiative (GRI) India Project (CDP) India of the Companies Act) Economic Responsibilities of Accountants of India •SME Rating Agency Business (NVG-SEE 2011) (ICAI)-sustainability of India Green ratings •SEBI mandate on disclosure for reporting framework •DFI and lender 100 largest listed firms (Nov guidelines 2011) •Guidelines on Corporate Governance for Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSE 2007)
Working Paper Summary … with the most comprehensive unifying framework being the NVG-SEE that was announced by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in 2011... • The NVG-SEE (National Voluntary Guideline on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities of Business) represents a Government of India driven framework meant to encourage “responsible business action” – It consists of 9 core principles that provides businesses a framework for taking responsible actions – There are also 34 representative reporting indicators and development of sector guidelines are in progress – The framework is designed on the 'Apply-or-Explain' principle. • The reporting framework outlined in the NVG-SEE has become mandatory for the largest listed companies through a SEBI resolution passed on November 24th, 2011. The NVG-SEE is getting visibility, traction and support from different Government agencies. It represents an opportunity for finance+ investors seeking E&S information to converge.
Working Paper Summary … and the NVG-SEE also endorses use of other E&S reporting frameworks providing impetus for global and Indian investors to converge Reporting process under the NVG-SEE Scenario Reporting process Through interviews it emerged that global Business entities that are preparing Furnish the same report with a investors prefer a their Business Responsibility reports mapping of the principles of these global standard; while in a nationally/ internationally guidelines with disclosure Indian investors prefer recognized framework complying with the ‘law of the land’. The NVG- SEE provides a If not unifying framework for both. Business entities that are not fully Furnish a letter signed by MD/ CEO capacitated to prepare a detailed indicating commitment to the report on RB practices Guidelines and a brief on activities undertaken If not Business entities that committed to Furnish a report on the basis of the furnishing a detailed Business framework Responsibility report
Working Paper Summary To evaluate if E&S related actions may be on the anvil by Indian policy makers, the Indian interventions were mapped against 20 global ones… Map of global E&S disclosure and reporting initiatives LEGEND 100% USA Singapore Finland Sweden: Guidelines for external reporting Malaysia : Malaysian Stock Exchange CR disclosure Japan 80% France China: Shanghai Stock Exchange Guideline on Environmental Information Disclosure by China- Revenue of businesses effected as a % of GDP SEPA India NVG Listed Companies Australia China: Shenzhen Stock Exchange Social Denmark Responsibility Instructions to Listed Companies 60% China: Shenzhen Stock Exchange Social contribution value per share China- Japan Eco China: State-Owned Assets Supervision and Shanghai Action 21 Administration Commission (SASAC) directive Stock Exchange France: Nouvelles Régulations Économiques 40% India-SEBI 2001 China - India- SASAC Denmark: Law on CSR reporting Mandatory United UK: Companies Act 2006 NVG South Kingdom Africa Finland: Finnish Accounting Standards Germany Singapore : Singapore Stock Exchange 20% Malaysia Initiative sustainability policy disclosure India: SEBI directive on CG disclosure China- India: SEBI directive on Business Responsibility Shenzhen reports by top 100 companies by Market Cap Sweden Stock Exchange India: National Voluntary Guidelines on Social, 50% Environmental and Economic Responsibilities 0% .01% 5% of Business Percentage of businesses effected USA: SEC filing regulation Germany: Corporate Governance Code Voluntary initiative Mandatory initiative Developed Country initiative Emerging Country initiative Australia: Corporate governance guidelines South Africa: King Report on Corporate To understand the impact, initiatives were mapped on 2 dimensions: Governance for South Africa (King III), 2009 Japan: Environmental Reporting Guidelines • Impact of the initiative as a percentage of GDP (2007) • Percentage of businesses impacted Japan: Eco-Action 21
Working Paper Summary … and found Indian policy, although recent, as being in the progressive zone Framework for mapping ‘Progressive’ and ‘Safe’ policies ‘Safe’ mandatory policy zone’ reflect s 100% mandatory policies, which are directed USA Singapore Progressive Finland toward a small percentage of businesses. mandatory Voluntary initiatives in the same region could 80% France policy zone Japan be deemed over-precautionary. China- Progressive Revenue of businesses effected as a % of GDP SEPA India - NVG Policy dead zone is the regions where there is Denmark Australia voluntary little impact and yet impacts a large number 60% policy zone of businesses and no policies would exist China- Shanghai Japan Eco Action 21 there. Stock 40% Exchange India-SEBI Progressive mandatory policy zone is for China - India- SASAC policies that have a significant impact Mandatory United NVG South Kingdom through a relatively small percentage of Africa Germany companies. This coincides with the ‘Safe 20% Malaysia Safe Policy voluntary policy zone’. mandatory China- dead-zone Shenzhen Sweden Stock policy zone Progressive voluntary policy zone’ consists of Exchange 50% voluntary policies that impacts a large 0% .01% 5% 100% Percentage of businesses effected percentage of the GDP and a large number of companies. Voluntary initiative Mandatory initiative Developed Country initiative Emerging Country initiative Indian initiatives are progressive when contrasted with other emerging and developed markets; as they confirm with progressive global standards of mandatory policies for large / listed companies and voluntary policies and support for actions for other businesses.
Working Paper Summary Finance+ investors that are increasingly present in India need E&S information The landscape is conducive + for E&S standardization but a Indian Govt and global initiatives are looking to number of hurdles remain… promote responsible business actions & reporting
Working Paper Summary To determine if investors can drive the emergence of a standardized E&S framework in India, a few key questions need to be answered… 1.What is the Common ground between finance+ investors ? Can they agree to a minimum common framework for E&S disclosure? • Specifically finance+ investors have been considered, since they stand to benefit the most in the near-term 2. Would standardized reporting framework, take a sector approach or a universal approach? 3. How does one create the critical mass for standardized disclosure to have value for investors? 4. What would be the quantitative benefits for investors and businesses? Would standardized public disclosure/ reporting reduce cost? Can enhanced E&S disclosure by companies be linked to additional capital flow?
Working Paper Summary … and the earlier questions need to be answered in context of global investor driven actions around E&S that cut across sectors Investor driven global principles Global Standards for E&S Reporting Current investor standards UN Principles for Responsible Global Reporting Initiative (GR) • Each investor category follows Investment (UNPRI) GRI produces sustainability reporting its own approach of conducting These principles provide investors a frameworks, the last one being G3 E&S due diligence. For Eg. DFIs framework to incorporate ESG issues Guidelines, published in 2006. such as IFC, CDC, FMO, DEG .The 960 signatories include a mix of Initiated by CERES in 1998, the first have their own E &S due asset owners, investment managers generation of guidelines were diligence criteria. and professional service partners. released in 2000 and are supported by Sector Supplements and National • IFC Performance Standards and Equator principles Annexes . CDC’s standard( toolkit) are Based on IFC Performance Standards used by many investors for and World Bank ‘s Environmental, Impact Reporting and Investment their own due diligence. Health, and Safety Guidelines , these Standards (IRIS) provide a credit risk management IRIS represents a set of recognized framework for assessing and terms and definitions for reporting managing E&S risk in project finance. on social, environmental, and financial performance. IRIS is an London Principles of Sustainable initiative of the Global Impact Finance Investing Network (GIIN). A set of 7 principles establishing a mechanism with which financial markets can promote the financing of sustainable development.
Working Paper Summary To learn more… 1. The complete landscape document is available for download at: www.cKinetics.com/CrackingTheConundrum 2. To engage in investor and stakeholders conversations to answer these questions, please contact: skapur@ckinetics.com 3. To get the final document, tentatively titled “Cracking the Conundrum” please write to: skapur@ckinetics.com
Working Paper Summary About cKinetics About cKinetics cKinetics is an operational consulting and strategic services firm exclusively focused on shaping scalable sustainability solutions with businesses and investors. With operations in India and in the United States, the firm has 3 focus areas: (a) resource efficiency on the fronts of carbon, energy, water and waste; (b) renewable energy and (c) smart infrastructure. Market Access and Review of market mechanisms and design For more information visit www.ckinetics.com INDIA: Insight of market intervention strategy 708 Hemkunt Chambers Regulatory and Policy analysis 89 Nehru Place State of Sector Reports New Delhi 110019 Market development platforms USA: 262 Ventura Avenue Investment and Risk Business and Financial Modeling Palo Alto, CA 94306 Advisory Supply chain sustainability mapping and For any queries or clarifications: risk assessment / mitigation contact@cKinetics.com Valuation and investment strategies Investment mandates Sustainability Resource efficiency roadmap & Blueprint Implementation Environmental and Sustainability Reports Material Performance and Management Brand creation and brand management
You can also read