Introduction in the topic of passivation - Swiss Medtech
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Introduction in the topic of passivation Dr. Patrik Schmutz EMPA, Laboratory for Joining Technologies and Corrosion (Head: Dr. Lars Jeurgens) 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland contact: patrik.schmutz@empa.ch INSIGHT Fachtagung, Swiss Medtech Veranstaltung 16.02.2021
Outline ◼ Introduction about fundamentals of passivation ◼ Surface analysis of nm-thick “passivated” films - Principle of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy - Passive films on Steel - Weakest spot ◼ Facts about localized corrosion resistance - Local methods - Corrosion resistance and alloying elements ◼ Summary - Homogeneous - Large scale Durability Functionality
Electrochemistry at metallic surfaces Core competences of the group • Passivation of reactive metal surfaces • Electrochemical characterizations • Biocompatibility of functional metallic surfaces Dr. Patrik Schmutz Micro and Nano Electrochemical surface Surface analytical Electrochemistry Modification characterizations N. Ott / J.Kollender M. Khokhlova / R. Han R. Hauert / C. Cancellieri Platinum Mg hydroxide Mg alloy FIB sections: Ion beam images - Microcapillary electrochemistry - EPMA, SEM (EDX) - Environmental AFM - SEN nanoelectrochemistry - Anodizing - XPS /AES spectroscopies - Synchrotron “electrochemical“ - Electrodeposition - Synchrotron methods tomography - Photo-electrochemistry (HAXPES / EXAFS)
What is passivation !!! Material science ◼ Spontaneous formation (milliseconds in atmospheric / aqueous environment) of a Reactions involved nm-thick protective layer 1) Metal oxidation ◼ Thickened by Laser Treatments 2) Metallic ion dissolution 3) Water splitting and anion incorporation Material Oxide Solution Microelectronics Thickness: 2 nm ◼ Hydrogen surface termination of silicon to avoid formation of a nm-thick oxide Chemical passivation ◼ Reinforcement (homogenization) of an existing nm-thick oxide layer
Iron oxide thermodynamic stability Passivation is linked to the possibility to form stable oxide. Your first reflex should be to consult the relevant Pourbaix diagram (e.g: iron in water): Reaction considered: I: Electrochemical equilibrium (Redox potentials) II: Electrochemical equilibrium involving reaction with water III: Chemical equilibrium
Complex microstructure and surface defects Steel inclusions - MnS Production related surface modified layer Punches Intergranular localized attack FIB section Deformed layer Welding process
Acidic chemical treatment What can be reached depending from natural passive film stability ? ◼ Etching/cleaning (for low alloyed steel) ◼ Alloying element enrichment in oxide (around the natural passivation threshold) ◼ Improved corrosion resistance / removal of surface defects ◼ Oxide surface functionalizing ◼ Surface cleaning (Ti alloys)
Classical salt spray testing Nitric acid chemical passivation 1.4305 1.4980 1.4545 1.4534 1.4568 1.4301 1.4541 1.4021 1.4016 1.4125 Citric acid chemical passivation 13-16%Cr + Mo • Corrosion management (failure analysis network @ Empa) 1.4305 1.4980 1.4545 1.4534 16-18 %Cr + 7-9%Ni - Accelerated corrosion tests condensation-water (EN ISO 6270-2) 1.4568 1.4301 1.4541 ditto + SO2 (EN ISO 6988) 12-18% Cr salt spray test (EN ISO 9227) 1.4021 1.4016 1.4125
Passivation: important parameters active log I passive Transpassive dissolution Or Water dissociation ER,a Epass Eact Ed E O2 + 2H2O + 4e- = 4OH- Erev,O2 = 1.23 - 0.059 pH [V] On an anodic polarization measurement, following domains are important: Active: very rapid current increase (charge transfer controlled) Active–passive transition: order of magnitude decrease of current Passive: current in the microampère/cm2 domain, stable surface
X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy Focusing monochromator Electron gun Electron b) energy analyzer QUANTUM 2000 i-XPS Al Anode Probe Scanning XPS (ESCA): Focused monochromatized X-Ray source for point analysis and chemical mapping Measurement: - All elements except H - Measurement depth ca. 2-4 nm (inelastic mean free path)
Surface analysis : XPS and Auger spectroscopies • AES with focused electron beam (good lateral resolution) • Electron energy is element specific • XPS poorer lateral resolution because of the X-Rays but easier access to chemical information
Where is the chemical information ? • Oxidation state can be characterized by energy shifts because of the different amount of electrons surrounding an atom in ions • Oxides and hydroxide can be very well distinguished because the influence of the proton (H+) on O2- energy level is stronger than the influence of the surrounding metallic ions. 4000 A) O 1s 3000 Intensity [counts/s] 2- O - 2000 0H 1000 2- SO4 H2 O 0 528 530 532 534 Binding Energy [eV]
XPS spectra of chromium 2p level Fe25Cr alloy passivated at 0.5V SHE during 5 minutes 2500 A) Cr 2p 3/2 (solution: 0.1M H2SO4 + 0.4M Na2SO4). 2000 Intensity [counts/s] 1500 1000 Cr hyd 3+ 2000 Cr Cr 2p 500 Cr met Cr other 0 1500 572 576 580 Binding Energy [eV] Intensity [counts/s] Detail of the Cr 2p3/2 peak as a function of the 1000 Cr hyd X-Ray source used: a) Al ka monochromatized, pass energy 5.85 eV 3+ 500 Cr b) Al ka standard, pass energy 5.85 eV Cr met Cr other satellite 3000 0 B) Cr 2p 3/2 575 580 585 590 2500 Binding Energy [eV] 2000 Intensity [counts/s] 1500 Large amount of Chromium 3+ in 1000 Cr 3+ Cr hyd oxide and hydroxide form is found 500 Cr met Cr other 0 in the passive film 572 576 Binding Energy [eV] 580
XPS: passivation of stainless steel • Chromium is the important element to build a stable passive film (an amount of 12% is necessary to reach is significant enrichment in the passive layer in acidic media) • Often quantified in terms of Crox/(Cr ox+ Fe ox) or Crox/Feox ratio • Ni and Mo are almost not present in the passive oxide film 9 Crox / (Cr ox+ Fe ox) 4 Cr content in alloy (x100)
Chemical passivation: efficiency and industrial use ◼ Material: 1.4021 (X20 Cr13) Sandblasted surface (1.4021) Laser welding (1.4021) 6 6 without passivation 5 5 Deconex passivation 4 4 Crox/Feox 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 ◼ Material : 1.4301 (X5 CrNi18-10) Sandblasted surface (1.4301) Laser welding (1.4301) 6 6 without passivation 5 traditional passivation 5 4 Deconex passivation 4 Crox/Feox 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0
Laser induced surface oxidation ? Stainless steel Titanium and Ti-alloys • Thicker surface oxide requiring modified chemical treatment to remove • Extreme case due to high oxygen thicker Fe-oxide (or not if preferential affinity of Ti crystal structures Cr-oxidation can be obtained) Laser Treatment Surface treatment Oxide thickness Machined 8 nm Laser treated around 100 nm Passive surface K. M. Łęcka et al. Journal of Laser Applications 28, 032009 (2016)
• Is an alloying element enrichment in the passive oxide sufficient ? - What about corrosion behavior of passivated surfaces ? Electrochemical characterization of oxide breakdown behavior is necessary because a good passivation induces a risk of localized corrosion - Weakest spot - Local methods - Homogeneous - Large scale Durability Functionality
Localized corrosion For a passive metal to become susceptible to localized corrosion… Two conditions have to be fulfilled: 1) Presence of aggressive anions (element: Cl, F, Br, I) local attack (dissolution) of the passive film 2) The equilibrium potential of the material must be higher than a characteristic potential Pitting potential Pitting of Cr-Ni stainless steel in HCl
Important stages of localized attacks • Pit initiation Increase Penetration Island absorption Oxide cracking Crox / Fe ox ratio • Metastable pitting • Pit growth cathodic partial reaction Increase Passive oxide Stainless steel substrate alloying Anodic metal dissolution
Typical pitting potentials Metal Pitting potential The base material influence: (SHE) Aluminum • stability of the passive film / Nickel or Zirconium 18/8 CrNi steel • presence of defects (DIN 1.4301) 12% Cr steel 30% Cr Steel Chromium Pitting potential of different Titanium metallic materials in 0.1M NaCl, T= 25°C Really good localized corrosion resistance, if O2 + 2H2O + 4e- = 4OH- Epit > Erev,O2 = 1.23 - 0.059 pH[V]
Conclusions ◼ Corrosion resistance of steel (stainless steel) is obtained by chromium cation enrichment in the passive oxide with an alloy threshold value of 12%. This process happens naturally in acidic media ◼ Below this composition threshold value, only surface etching/cleaning effects can be obtained ◼ In this «transition» composition domain (around 12% Cr), additional strengthening/ functionalizing of the oxide can be obtained by a targeted acidic chemical passivation (increase Crox/Feox ratio) ◼ A really stable oxide on stainless steel in very acidic environment can only be obtained with high chromium alloy concentration. In this case, additional chemical passivation can only bring some surface functionalities ◼ Localized corrosion resistance in presence of chlorides (Epit > Erev,O2) is difficult to obtain by passive film engineering and is enhanced by adding slowly dissolving element like Molybdenum
Thank you for you attention
• Alloying element, corrosion resistance and field of application of various stainless steels
Advanced passivation characterization Oxide stability (EQCN) Oxide lateral homogeneity (Microcapillary cell) platinum wire electrolyte bridge holder (SCE) Silicone sealing rubber sample d = 300 nm - 1000 µm
Type of Corrosion Abbreviated name Material PREn**) Applications steel resistance no. Type of steel Corrosion Abbreviated Material no. PREn Applications class*) resistance name CrNi I X5CrNi18-10 1.4301 18 humid areas steels X4CrNi18-12 1.4303 18 X6CrNiTi18-10 1.4541 18 X2CrNi19-10 1.4306 19 CrNiMo II X5CrNiMo17-12-2 1.4401 24 mild outdoor climate, steels X6CrNiMoTi17-12-2 1.4571 24 weathered X2CrNiMo17-12-2 1.4404 24 X3CrNiMo17-13-3 1.4436 26 X2CrNiMo18-14-3 1.4435 27 X2CrNiMoN17-11-2 1.4406 30 X2CrNiMoN17-13-3 1.4429 32 III X2NiCrMoCu25-20-5 1.4539 35 outdoor climate, unweathered X2CrNiMoN17-13-5 1.4439 37 industrial atmosphere, weathered X2CrNiMoN22-5-3 1.4462** 37 *) IV X1NiCrMoCuN25-20-7 1.4529 47 aggressive media X1CrNiMoCuN20-18-7 1.4547 48 indoor swimming pools, X2CrNiMnMoNbN25- 1.4565 50 tunnels, sewage treatment 18-5-4 plants Special NiCr21Mo14W 2.4602 (66) Combination of aggressive materials NiMo16Cr15W 2.4819 (68) media NiMo16Cr16Ti 2.4610 (69) chemicals industry
• Online “chemical passivation” characterization electrochemical method
EQCN: “Passive” oxide film stability Ferritic Stainless Steel: Fe25Cr Metal Oxide Solution in 0.1M H2SO4 + 0.4M Na2SO4 Thickness: 2 nm • Mass decrease (oxide dissolution in the passive domain) on the electrode 0 current density |i| [mA/cm 4 ] 2 Current density (mA/cm2) mass change 2) -2000 current density 2 • (ng/cm mA/cm2 current densities ²m [ng/cm 1 measured still represent -4000 8 6 mm/year dissolution change 4 change -6000 2 • Larger amount of chromium are necessary in the alloy to Mass -8000 mass 8 0.1 stabilize the oxide 6 2 -10000 ] -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Potential E (vs. SHE) [V]
• Laterally resolved electrochemical defect identification / characterization
Lateral defect distribution on Steel 1.4301 Stainless Steel with 0.017% S SEM before • MnS inclusions form and are preferential sites for localized corrosion MnS attack interface bulk • Size dependent analysis: defect distribution 12 µm 3 Pitting potential as function of measured area 10 1 M NaCl MnS -2 10 10 2 interface ] 2 Current density [µA/cm -3 10 1 10 Current [nA] bulk -4 10 0 10 -5 10 -1 10 -6 d = 2.5 µm 10 -2 area 10 -500 0 500 1000 Potential [m V] (SCE)
You can also read