INO: Community-Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Environmental Monitoring Report Semi-Annual Report November 2018 INO: Community-Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Reporting period: January to June 2018 Prepared by the Directorate General of Social Forestry and Environmental Partnership, Ministry of Environment and Forestry for the Asian Development Bank This Semi-annual Environmental Monitoring Report is a document of the Recipient. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB Board of Directors, Management or staff, and my be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as the legal or other status of any territory or area.
FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM 1:
COMMUNITY-FOCUSED INVESTMENTS TO ADDRESS
DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION
SEMI-ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL
SAFEGUARD MONITORING REPORT
(JANUARY-JUNE 2018)
Prepared for:
ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
6 ADB AVENUE
MANDALUYONG CITY 1550
METRO MANILA
PHILIPPINES
Prepared by:
DIRECTORATE OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT FOR
SOCIAL FORESTRY AND CUSTOMARY FOREST
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF SOCIAL FORESTRY AND
ENVIRONMENTAL PARTNERSHIP
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTRY
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
GEDUNG MANGGALA WANABAKTI, BLOCK IV, 8TH FLOOR
JAKARTA, INDONESIA
NOVEMBER 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................... I
LIST OF TABLES.................................................................................................... II
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................. II
LIST OF APPENDICES .......................................................................................... II
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1
1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 1
1.2 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THE MONITORING REPORT ............................... 1
2.0 KEY-PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS .......................................... 2
2.1 PROJECT PROFILE ................................................................................................ 2
2.2 PROGRESS OF KEY-PROJECTS ACHIEVED DURING THE
REPORTING PERIOD .............................................................................................. 6
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS ........................................... 7
3.1 SCREENING AND CATEGORIZATION PROCESS ............................................... 7
3.2 ADB ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARD POLICY ................................................... 8
3.3 APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS IN
INDONESIA .............................................................................................................. 8
3.4 IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES .............. 9
3.5 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND RESPONSIBILLITY ............................ 10
4.0 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ...................................................... 12
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING STATUS .............................................. 12
6.0 CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ............................. 12
7.0 CAPACITY BUILDING UNDERTAKEN ...................................................... 13
8.0 FINDINGS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION ................................................... 13
9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................... 15
10.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................ 16
SA Environmental Safehuards i FIP-1
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Overall Output Details and Activity Description ............................................................................... 2
Table 2. Progress of Sub-Projects during the Reporting Period.................................................................... 6
Table 3. Comparison between ADB and the Government’s Project Categories ........................................... 7
Table 4. Status of Project Screening and Categorization in S1/2018 ............................................................ 7
Table 5. Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures in Semester 1/2018 ................................................. 9
Table 6. Institutional Responsibilities for Environmental Monitoring ........................................................... 10
Table 7. Consultation and Project Disclosure ............................................................................................. 13
Table 8. Findings and Corrective Action During Reporting Period of S1/2018 ............................................ 13
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. FIP-1 Villages in Kapuas Hulu District ........................................................................................... 4
Figure 2. FIP-1 Villages in Sintang District .................................................................................................... 5
Figure 3. Project Organization for Environmental Monitoring ...................................................................... 12
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Proposed Location of Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation in Radin Jaya Village
Appendix 2 Official Minutes of Public Consultation
Appendix 3 Public Consultation
Appendix 4 GRM Scheme and Complaint Form (GRM)
Appendix 5 Environmental Impact Assessment
Appendix 6 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA)
Appendix 7 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist for Microhydro Power Plant in
Kayu Dujung Village
Appendix 8 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist for Solar Panel in Kayu Dujung
Village
SA Environmental Safehuards ii FIP-1
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank
AMDAL Analisa Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan (Environmental Impact Assessment - full
process)
ANDAL Analisa Dampak Lingkungan (Environmental Impact Analysis - the study)
AP Affected Person
AWP Annual Work Plan
BBTNBKDS Balai Besar Taman Nasional Betung Kerihun dan Danau Sentarum (Betung
Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park Agency)
BLH Badan Lingkungan Hidup (Local Environmental Office)
BPHP Balai Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi (Production Forest Management Agency)
BPSKL Balai Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan (Social Forestry and
Environmental Partnerhsips)
BUPSHA Bina Usaha Perhutanan Sosial dan Hutan Adat (Business Development of Social
Forestry and Customary)
CBFM Community based forest management
DG Directorate General
EA Executing Agency
EARF Environmental Assessment Review Framework
EIA Environmental impact assessment
FIP Forest Investment Program
FMU Forest Management Unit
FPIC Free Prior and Informed Consent
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GIZ Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit
GOI Government of Indonesia
GPP Grievance Point Person
GRC Grievances Redress Committee
GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism
IA Implementation Agency
IEE Initial Environmental Examination
IFC International Finance Corporation
JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency
KPH Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (Forest Management Unit)
KPHP Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi (Unit of Production Forest Management)
SA Environmental Safehuards iii FIP-1
KSDAE Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam dan Ekosistem (Conservation of Natural
Resources and Ecosystem)
MHA Masyararakat Hutan Adat (Customary Forest Community)
MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forestry
PAM Project Administration Manual
PCU Program Coordination Unit
PHPL Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi Lestari (Management of Sustainable Production
Forests)
PJLHK Pemanfaatan Jasa Lingkungan Hutan Konservasi (Utilization of Conservation
Forest Environmental Services
PSC Project Steering Committee
PSKL Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan (Social Forestry and
Environmental Partnerships)
PISU Project Implementation Supporting Unit
REA Rapid Environmental Assessment
REDD+ Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, conservation,
sustainable forest management and forest carbon (“+” refers to the last three
phrases)
RKL Rencana Pengelolaan Lingkungan (Environment Management Plan - companion
To ANDAL)
RPHJP Rencana Pengelolaan Hutan Jangka Panjang (Long-term Forest Management
Plan)
RPL Rencana Pemantauan Lingkungan (Environmental Monitoring Plan - companion
To ANDAL)
SAEMR Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Report
SC Steering Committee
SFM Sustainable Forest Management
SNI Indonesia National Standard
SPPL Surat Pernyataan Pengelolaan Lingkungan (Environmental Management
Statement)
SPS Safeguard Policy Statement
TOR Terms of Reference
UKL Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan (Environmental Management Effort)
UPL Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Monitoring Effort)
UPT Unit Pelaksana Teknis (Technical Implementation Unit)
WB World Bank
WWF World Wide Fund for Nature
SA Environmental Safehuards iv FIP-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND 1. The FIP-1 project is part of Indonesia's forestry investment plan that will complement the FIP project managed by the Asian Development Bank (ADB), World Bank (WB) and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) in addressing the causes of deforestation and forest degradation. The project consists of several sub-projects both land-based activities and non-land based activities that invest in community-based REDD+ activities (e.g. community-based land use planning, community-based forest monitoring and fire-caring communities, community-based forest regeneration, and community-based ecotourism) in four forest management units (KPH) in two districts (Kapuas Hulu and Sintang) in the province of West Kalimantan. 2. West Kalimantan, which is a key province in the Heart of Borneo Initiative, has a large forests area and is the fifth largest provincial contributor to Indonesia’s carbon emissions. The four key drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in the province are: (i) commercial logging; (ii) forest conversion to agriculture (primarily to palm oil); (iii) mining (primarily coal and gold); and (iv) uncontrolled fires. ADB’s contribution, as well as the contribution of other institutions (e.g., GIZ and JICA) will support the government to implement the provincial REDD+ strategy, thus helping West Kalimantan to achieve the 2020 GHG reduction target of 266.11 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e) from the forestry and peat sectors. 3. In addition to reducing GHG emissions, which are the main objectives of the FIP-1 program, there are also policies to increase carbon stocks through land rehabilitation programs, provide benefits to the livelihoods of communities around the forest through agroforestry activities, strengthen land management rights for Indigenous Peoples (MHA) on their customary lands, improve conservation and biodiversity, facilitate institutional strengthening, and provide environmental services. Institutional strengthening is more about strengthening the capacity of FMUs/KPHs, districts and province government, and providing support to harmonize policies at the regional and central levels in terms of increasing carbon stocks by building non-monetary incentives and implementing monitoring, environmental safeguards, and fair benefit sharing arrangements and gender responsiveness. 4. The process of implementing community-based forest emission reduction and forest investment policies is carried out through a series of land-based and non-land based sub-projects in 17 villages (both Kapuas Hulu and Sintang Districts). These activities require an environmental and social safeguard that is in line with and in accordance with national regulations and ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) as a donor (Compliance). The environmental mitigation and monitoring process is very important to minimize the potential impacts that are expected to occur during the project implementation phase. 1.2 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THE MONITORING REPORT 5. The main objective of this Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (SAEMR) is to briefly present the progress of the FIP-1 program from January until June 2018. Further, this report will explain the range of potential impacts that will arise during the achievement of each sub-project and mitigation actions that can be taken to minimize these potential impacts. SA Environmental Safehuards 1 FIP-1
2.0 KEY-PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS
2.1 PROJECT PROFILE
6. The objective of the FIP-1 program is to improve the capacity and livelihoods of
communities around forest areas in 17 villages of the Kapuas Hulu and Sintang Districts. It is
expected to provide benefits to the community, in terms of both environmental and livelihood
improvements. The results of the FIP-1 project are achieved in several outputs, namely:
▪ Output-1, REDD+ demonstrations that focus on the community and gender responsiveness
in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang districts are implemented.
▪ Output-2, Implementation of REDD+ strategies in West Kalimantan Province.
▪ Output-3, Harmonization of Fiscal Policy on REDD+ between subnational and national
levels.
7. Based on the Annual Work Plan (AWP) for 2018, which was developed by the Executing
Agency i.e. Directorate General of Social Forestry and Environmental Partnerships (Direktur
Jenderal Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan) in February 2018, some of the proposed
sub-project activities that will be conducted in 2018 – 2021 are provided in Table 1.
Table 1. Overall Output Details and Activity Description
Activity on Year of
Output Description
PAM Implementation
The project will develop an Agroforestry system
involving coffee, agarwood and rubber in 40 ha
from 1.880 ha total of degraded land. The activity
will be carried out due to the uncontrolled
Agroforestry 2018
exploitation of the community. To reduce pressure
on natural forests, the project will support the pilot
to grow agarwood in an Agroforestry system with
coffee.
Natural restoration of forests will be conducted for
20 ha from total 6000 ha. The activity will include
Community Rubber the identification of a suitable area that matches
focused and Plantation with the FMU plan, identification of native species
gender 2018
(Land for planting, construction of nurseries in three FMU
responsive Rehabilitation) (Sungai Merakai, Kapuas Hulu, and Blok XXI), and
REDD+ pilots planting of around 1.5 million native plants. Nursery
in Kapuas
design will follow best local practices.
Hulu and
Sintang FIP-1 through BPSKL as IA will provide 250 unit
Districts Solar Panel solar panels for Radin Jaya Village, (Sintang 2018
implemented District).
Two schemes of community-managed micro-hydro
power plants will be installed, with a capacity to
Micro Hydro produce 40 KVA along with an air power network, Postponed to
Power Plant to cover around 200 households in Kayu Dujung 2019
Village (Sintang District) and Tanjung Lokang
(Kapuas Hulu District).
Drinking This project will construct 2 units of clean water
Water facilities in all targeted villages to overcome the 2018
Facilities scarcity of clean water. Water is currently obtained
SA Environmental Safehuards 2 FIP-1
Activity on Year of
Output Description
PAM Implementation
from rivers with poor water quality around
residences, as well as rainwater. Access to clean
water sources is 6-7 km on average, along difficult
terrain.
Rehabilitation of village roads along 2 km will be
carried out through this project. Community access
Road Postponed to
to the main road will be easier to increase the
Rehabilitation 2019
opportunity to market agricultural products, and
reduce transportation time and costs.
Source: AWP 2018.
8. The Outputs 2 and 3 will not be included in this environmental monitoring report, as the
details of the plan, activity and timeline for implementation have not yet been determined by IA /
UPT.
9. The locations of the FIP-1 Program, which cover 17 villages, are provided in Figure 1 and
Figure 2.
SA Environmental Safehuards 3 FIP-1
Figure 1. FIP-1 Villages in Kapuas Hulu District SA Environmental Safehuards 4 FIP-1
Figure 2. FIP-1 Villages in Sintang District SA Environmental Safehuards 5 FIP-1
2.2 PROGRESS OF KEY-PROJECTS ACHIEVED DURING THE
REPORTING PERIOD
10. FIP-1 implementation started with public consultation activities in Sintang District (five
villages). The activity was conducted together with FMU-Sintang Utara as the responsible
agency for the forest area in Sintang district between 18 - 28 May 2018. The detail of the
progress and activities conducted from January to June 2018 is explained as follows:
Table 2. Progress of Sub-Projects during the Reporting Period
Planned
Proposed Location Description Progress until June 2018
Activities in 2018
Agroforestry and Radin Jaya Village, BPSKL as IA will • Public Consultation regarding
(Mengerat, Nalan conducted 40 ha of FIP-1 Program and all sub-
Rubber Plantation Radin, and Sebara agroforestry with tree projects have been held in
Sub –Village) species of petai, engkol Senangan Kecil, Senangan
and gaharu, as well as Jaya, Tanjung Sari, Radin
some vegetables, paddy Jaya, and Kayu Dujung
The location regarding and 20 ha of rubber by Villages conducted on 18 – 28
agroforestry and using Community May 2018 (Official Minutes of
rubber plantation in Participation method. Public Consultation regarding
Radin Jaya Village in FIP-1 program in Appendix
Appendix A1 A2).
Solar Panels Radin Jaya Village BPSKL as IA will procure • The procurement of the solar
(Sungai Sepan Sub 250 units of solar panel. panel was delayed.
Village)
Micro Hydro Power Kayu Dujung Village - 1 Unit (40 KVA) will • The provision of the micro-
Plant Sungai Puang Sub- provided by BPSKL hydro power plant was
Village. delayed.
Clean water supply In all FIP-1 Villages 10 Unit of drinking
facility targeted facilities in Sintang • The provision of the clean
District will provided by water supply was delayed.
BPSKL
Road Rehabilitation In all FIP-1 Villages A total of 10 Km of Village • The rehabilitation of village
targeted (BPHP/KPHP Road in Radin Jaya, road was delayed.
as IA on first semester Senangan Kecil,
of 2019 will decide for Senangan Besar villages.
specific village)
SA Environmental Safehuards 6 FIP-13.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS
3.1 SCREENING AND CATEGORIZATION PROCESS
11. In FIP-1 program, the environmental screening and categorization process was carried
out by following Government of Indonesia regulations and ADB’s Safeguard Policies (SPS
2009) requirement. All subproject activities should screen out in order to find the influence
magnitude by defining the most environmentally sensitive components, including direct,
indirect, cumulative and induced impacts in the scope of the subproject (EARF, 2016).
Therefore, each proposed subproject in FIP-1 program for S1/2018 has examined related to
the type, location, scale and sensitivity and the magnitude of the potential environmental
impacts.
12. The categorization for subproject should be included into ADB project categories and
National categories, which explained in Table 3.
Table 3. Comparison between ADB and the Government’s Project Categories
ADB Project Categories AMDAL Project Policies
▪ Category A: Projects with potential for significant AMDAL: Projects with potential for substantial impacts
adverse environmental impacts, requiring an EIA. on the environment require AMDAL (including ToR,
ANDAL, and RKL/RPL).
▪ Category B: Projects judged to have some UKL-UPL: Projects are not required to have AMDAL but
adverse environmental impacts, but of lesser are obliged to have an UKL/UPL.
degree and/or significance than category A SPPLH: Projects that do not require AMDAL or UKL/UPL
projects. Category B projects require IEE. are obliged to submit a Statement of Management and
Environmental Monitoring Ability or SPPL.
▪ Category C: Projects unlikely to have adverse SPPLH: Projects that do not require AMDAL or UKL/UPL
environmental impacts. are obliged to submit a Statement of Management and
Environmental Monitoring Ability or SPPL.
Source: EARF, 2016
13. Not all of sub-projects has been implemented in the Semester 1/2018, therefore,
screening and categorization activities has been carried out only for subproject as listed in
Table 4.
Table 4. Status of Project Screening and Categorization in S1/2018
Sub-projects ADB Requirements Status Government of Status
Planned for 2018 Indonesia
Requirements
Agroforestry REA – Screening SPPL (does not have Not
(Conducted by Checklist for Completed an potential impact, completed
BPSKL) Agroforestry - but still need to
Appendix A6 manage)
Rubber Plantation SPPL (does not have Not
(Conducted by Completed an potential impact, completed
BPSKL) but still need to
manage)
Microhydro Power REA – Screening UKL-UPL (Within Not
Plant (will conducted Checklist for Micro In - progress Protected forest) completed
by BPSKL) Hydro Power-
Appendix A7
SA Environmental Safehuards 7 FIP-1Solar Panel (BPSKL REA – Screening SPPL (does not have
as IA will appoint the Checklist for Solar Completed an potential impact, Not
third party to install Panel - Appendix A8 but still need to Completed
the equipment) manage)
Drinking Water REA – Screening Not Completed Not Yet Categorized Not
Facilities (will conduct Checklist for Drinking Completed
by BPSKL) Water Facilities
Road Rehabilitation REA – Screening Not Completed Not Yet Categorized Not
(will conduct By Checklist for Road Completed
BPSHP) Rehabilitation
3.2 ADB ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARD POLICY
14. ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) consists of three operational policies on the
environment, indigenous peoples, and involuntary resettlement. The safeguard policies
require that: (i) impacts are identified and assessed early in the project cycle; (ii) plans to
avoid, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for the potential adverse impacts are developed and
implemented; and (iii) affected people are informed and consulted during project preparation
and implementation.
3.3 APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND
REGULATIONS IN INDONESIA
15. Indonesia’s relevant environmental laws and regulations focusing on managing the
environmental impacts of development projects include:
▪ Law No. 32/2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management;
▪ Ministry of Environmental Regulation No. 5/2012 on Activities Requiring AMDAL Study;
▪ Ministry of Environmental Regulation No. 16/2012 on Guidance to prepare
Environmental Documents;
▪ Ministry of Environmental Regulation No. 17/2012 concerning Public Participation and
Information Disclosure in AMDAL Process; and
▪ Government Regulation No. 27/2012 on Environmental Permit.
16. Other pertinent legislation includes: Law No. 2/2012 on Land Acquisition for
Development in the Public Interest provides the framework for land acquisition, resettlement,
and compensation in Indonesia. Presidential Regulation No. 71/2012 (Implementation of Land
Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest) implements Law No. 2/2012. It is confirmed
that the FIP-1 project will not need such a land acquisition process as all activities will be
implemented within Indonesian Government lands.
17. Three regulations issued by the Ministry of Forestry support carbon sequestration and
REDD+ activities: (1) Minister of Forestry Regulation No. P.36/Menhut-II/2009 regarding
License Procedures for Carbon Sequestration and / or Carbon Storage Business in Forest
Production and Protection Forests; (2) Minister of Forestry Regulation No. P.68/Menhut-
II/2008 regarding Implementation of Demonstration Activities for Reducing Carbon Emissions
from Deforestation and Forest Degradation; and (3) Minister of Forestry Regulation No.
SA Environmental Safehuards 8 FIP-1P.30/Menhut-II/2009 regarding Procedures to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and
Forest Degradation. These regulations support SFM and environmental services.
18. West Kalimantan Regulation No. 7/1988 on Management and Conservation of the
Environment and West Kalimantan Governor Decree No. 120/1989 on Environmental Quality
Standards guide environmental management at the provincial level.
3.4 IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
MEASURES
19. After the screening process and categorization is carried out for each key project as
described in Section 3.1, a mitigation and monitoring action plan is developed. The detailed
impact assessment of project activities during the pre-construction, construction and
operational stages is presented in Appendix A5.
Table 5. Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures in Semester 1/2018
Proposed Mitigation Compliance
Key-Project Location Impacts
Mitigation Implemented Status/Remarks
Agroforestry 40 Radin ▪ Poor selection ▪ Public Only the Not applicable at
ha and Rubber Jaya in agro and Consultation Public this stage
Plantation Village rubber ▪ Select local seed Consultation
20 ha – these plantation site for used in has been
activities have potentially Agroforestry and conducted at
not been emerge conflict Rubber Plantation this village.
conducted. among local (it will suitable
community. with the local
▪ Non-local seed environment)
potentially
disturb the local
biodiversity.
▪ Poor selection ▪ Best Land Use
of plantation Practices None as the Not applicable at
and agro sites ▪ Minimize land project activity this stage.
can lead into opening and keep has not been
land clearing existing trees started.
and habitat loss.
▪ Implemented in
degraded area
▪ The use of ▪ Periodically
inorganic monitor the None as the Not applicable at
fertilizers is nutrient state of project activity this stage.
thought to the plants and the has not been
cause soil and soil quality to started.
water pollution determine correct
around the level of fertilizer
planting area. application;. Do
not over fertilize.
Solar Panel – Radin Procurement ▪ No Need for None as the Not applicable at
this is Jaya (Goods) Mitigation project activity this stage.
procurement Village has not been
activity which started.
has not been
conducted
Micro Hydro Kayu ▪ Poor Selection ▪ Conduct a Not applicable Not applicable at
Power Plant – Dujung of location could Feasibility Study at this stage. this stage.
this activity Village lead to habitat and Detail
has not been loss and Engineering
conducted Design.
SA Environmental Safehuards 9 FIP-1Proposed Mitigation Compliance
Key-Project Location Impacts
Mitigation Implemented Status/Remarks
biodiversity ▪ Obtain Permit in
disturbances Protected Forest
▪ Poor ▪ Obtain
consideration of Environmental
land status and Permit from local
ownerships authority
could arise a
potential conflict
Water quality ▪ Monitoring water
predicted to quality continually
decrease during
the construct ion.
Drinking All Will implemented in the next reporting period (S2/2018)
Water Villages in due to uncertainty of site selection. For the next plan, Not Complaint
Facilities Sintang BPSKL as IA, will communicate with Village Facilitators
and and District Coordinator for the location of Drinking
Kapuas facilities.
Hulu
District.
Road All Will implemented in the next reporting period (S2/2018)
Rehabilitation Villages in due to uncertainty of site selection. For the next plan, Not Complaint
Sintang BPHP as IA, will communicate with Village Facilitators and
and District Coordinator for the location of Drinking facilities.
Kapuas
Hulu
District.
Source: AWP, 2018 and EARF 2016
3.5 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND RESPONSIBILLITY
20. All institutions involved in the FIP-1 program participate in the environmental
monitoring activities of each project. The main objective of the involvement of all institutions,
both EA, IA, UPT, and PISU is to maintain the framework for implementing each activity so as
not to have a negative impact on the surrounding environment. Explanation of the roles and
responsibilities of each institution is provided in Table 6.
Table 6. Institutional Responsibilities for Environmental Monitoring
Project Implementation Management Roles and Status/Remarks
Organization Responsibilities
Will responsible for monitoring and Monitoring, evaluation and
PCU (Project Coordination evaluation for all FIP project in communication of FIP-1 project from
Unit) Indonesia. PCU will report the project January – December 2018.
progress to FIP focal point.
PMU will responsible to manage the During the reporting period, PMU has
project of FIP-1, including monitoring been involved in several activities
PMU (Project Management and evaluation as well. PMU also regarding monitoring and evaluation
Unit) coordinating all technical aspects with for administration aspect regarding
EA. PMU also involved in the flows of FIP-1 whether in Sintang or
reporting from PISU, IA, and EA. Putussibau Disrict.
The EA will oversee project activities During the reporting period, EA acted
as per standards and requirements of as supervisor and assessor about the
The Project’s EA (Dir. of
the financing modality and will progress of each activity both IA /
BUPSHA, DG of PSKL,
coordinate with MOF and ADB to UPT and PISU. The progress stated
MoEF)
ensure that the flow of funds is well in preliminary, quarterly, and semi-
organized. annual reports.
SA Environmental Safehuards 10 FIP-1Project Implementation Management Roles and Status/Remarks
Organization Responsibilities
Coordinating and managing project BUPSHA has managed and
activities under each agency. supervised all the sub-project, which
The Project’s IA (Dir of Providing technical advice to the has implemented during 2018
BUPSHA-DG of PSKL, Dir of project through the UPT. Obtaining through BPSKL, BBTNBKDS and
PJLHK-DG of KSDAE, and the required environmental approvals BPHP. Moreover, together with PISU
Dir of KPHP-DG of PHPL) from each department, and carrying ensure that safeguard aspect
out inspections of project facility's included into AWP and Term Of
quality control. Refencees of each sub-project.
Providing technical guidance to PISU For 2018, BPSKL has approved and
and KPH staff in the project activities conducted agroforestry (40 ha),
Technical Implementation
and holding regular technical rubber plantation (20 ha), and Solar
Unit (UPT) (BPSKL in
committee meetings to obtain panel (250 unit).
Banjarbaru, BPHP in
directions for implementing project
Pontianak, and BBTNBKDS
activities. Communicating with the
in Putussibau)
relevant directorates at the national
level.
FMU’s will supervised and monitored In 2018, FMU has Support and
FMU (KPH) – KPH Sintang all the activities which is related to the involved in all activities in sites level
Utara, KPH Kapuas Hulu FIP-1 program and ensure that all the with IA and PISU, as consultant and
Utara and KPH Kapuas Hulu activities are in line with RPHJP supervisor for each sub - project in
Selatan (Long-term Forest Management Sintang, such as Agroforestry, rubber
Plan). plantation and solar panel.
During January – June 2018, PISU
As the supporting unit, PISU works at
has prepared workplan and technical
the different levels of implementation
assistant for EA, IA/UPT in order to
(national, provincial and district) and
implemented subprojects in Sintang
Project Implementation together with the IA and EA to prepare
and Kapuas Hulu District. Moreover,
Supporting Unit (PISU) various technical aspects of key-
PISU has developed a good
projects, including risk and impact
communication with FMU and local
assessment that are likely to arise
organization/institution in order to
during implementation.
minimize problem in sites level.
Source: EARF and PAM 2016.
21. Lines of reporting and chains of coordination for conducting environmental monitoring
are provided in Figure 3.
SA Environmental Safehuards 11 FIP-1Figure 3. Project Organization for Environmental Monitoring
Source: EARF and PAM FIP-1, 2016
4.0 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM
22. The GRM scheme and Complaint Form have been designed by PISU during the
reporting period, (appendix 4) but not disseminated nor implemented yet.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING STATUS
23. There is no monitoring action has been conducted during the reporting period.
However, mitigation action plans have been prepared during the January – June 2018 period.
6.0 CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
24. Consultations and project disclosure concerning Community-Focused Investments to
Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation were conducted several times between
January 2018 and June 2018, as explained in Table 7 through briefing and public consultation,
particularly with five targeted villages of the FIP-1 in Sintang District.
SA Environmental Safehuards 12 FIP-1Table 7. Consultation and Project Disclosure
Date Phase/Topic Delivered Through Target Stakeholder Outcomes
FMU Kapuas Hulu
12 – 15 Utara, FMU Kapuas
FIP-1 program in Kapuas FMUs Kapuas Hulu FMUs receive project
February Hulu Selatan, FMU
Hulu. Office briefing.
2018 Sintang Utara, and
BBTNBKDS
Sub-district Embaloh
Hulu, Bunut Hilir,
19 – 23 Boyan Tanjung, Sub District
FIP-1 program in Kapuas Sub-District Kapuas
March Mentebah, Putusibau Stakeholder receive
Hulu. Hulu Office
2018 Selatan, Putusibau project briefing.
Utara, Selimbau dan
Badau
19 – 22 FIP-1 Program in Kapuas
Head of Kapuas Hulu All stakeholder in
April Kapuas Hulu District District and Key Kapuas Hulu receive
Hulu
2018 Person project briefing.
FIP-1 Program and
Subproject Detail for Key village
Radin Jaya,
2018, (All official minutes Stakeholders, elders
18 – 28 All five targeted Senangan Jaya,
in village level, including and customary
May villages in Sintang Senangan Kecil,
attendant list and other community including
2018 District. Tanjung Sari, and
documentation for the women received
Kayu Dujung Villages
public consultations is project briefing
provided in Appendix A3.)
7.0 CAPACITY BUILDING UNDERTAKEN
25. Institutional capacity building related to environmental safeguards for staff of KPH, IA
/ UPT and the community at the FIP-1 project location has not been implemented in the first
semester of 2018. The materials and schedules for this capacity building training is yet to be
developed.
8.0 FINDINGS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
26. Several findings has carried out during the reporting period, and corrective action that
will implemented on the next report has explained in Table 8.
Table 8. Findings and Corrective Action During Reporting Period of S1/2018
Status and
Finding(s) Corrective Action Due Date Remarks of
Corrective Actions
Conduct adequate screening
and categorization for each
Mitigation Measures To be reported in the
subproject by completing the
quarterly progress
Screening and categorization of required rapid environmental
and detailed in the
the subprojects as part of the assessment (REA) checklist; December 2018
semi-annual
environmental assessment has preliminary climate risk
environmental
not been adequately conducted. screening checklist’ and sub-
monitoring report.
project environmental
categorization form.
SA Environmental Safehuards 13 FIP-1Monitoring To be reported on
During January – June 2018, Conduct adequate Monitoring quarterly progress
there is no monitoring activities action for each subproject by and detailed in the
December 2018
for each subproject, only public following mitigation action semi-annual
consultation regarding FIP-1 plan that has been organized. environmental
program in general. monitoring report.
Capacity Building
PISU has started to give an
During reporting period, capacity To be reported on
input regarding trainings,
development for four FMU’s and workshops and others to
quarterly progress
others such as training, and detailed in the
develop capability in February 2019
workshop, seminars have not be semi-annual
safeguard environment, by
implemented due to non- environmental
discuss intensively regarding
allocated budget in BPHP AWP monitoring report
AWP 2019 with BPHP.
2018.
GRM needs to be discussed
Grievance Readdress with the local government at
Mechanism (GRM) To be reported on
the site level (Village, District,
quarterly progress
The GRM mechanism has not Regency, Province, etc.), as
and detailed in the
implemented during the reporting well as the FMU, as a locus February 2019
semi-annual
period, however, the scheme of FIP-1 activities, and the
environmental
and complaint form has been next stage, must be
monitoring report
organized by PISU. socialized to indigenous
peoples.
It is necessary to set the
Environmental Assessment target village and the
To be reported on
implementation timeline in
Screening and categorization for quarterly progress
accordance with the annual
drinking water facilities and Road and detailed in the
work plan (AWP) from each February 2019
Rehabilitation in 2018 has not semi-annual
IA (BPHP, BPSKL,
been conducted due to environmental
BBTNBKDS), so that the
uncertainty location from IA/UPT monitoring report
screening process can be
carried out properly.
SA Environmental Safehuards 14 FIP-19.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
27. Conclusions. Key conclusions drawn from the environmental safeguards monitoring
report of Semester 1/2018 are as follows:
▪ No physical activities on the ground have been conducted as part of the FIP-1 due to
procurement process by IA/UPT is always delayed and the allocation of time for
implementing activities changes, therefore corresponding environmental mitigation
and monitoring have not been conducted.
▪ Public consultations regarding FIP-1 program has been conducted on Day-month-
year at five targeted villages in Sintang District. The community members attending
these public consultations agreed to participate in the FIP-1 programs (including
women), for land base or non-land base activities.
▪ Screening and categorization has been carried out for Agroforestry (40 ha) and
Rubber Plantation (20 ha) at Radin Jaya Village, in Sintang District as per the
requirements of Government Regulation No. 27/2012 and Ministry of Environment
Regulation No. 5/2012 and ADB checklists.
▪ During the reporting period, the capacity development for FMUs, has not implemented
due to non-allocation budget by BPHP as IA to conducted that activities.
▪ GRM scheme and complaint form has created by PISU; however, has not
implemented yet during reporting period. PISU will consult the draft with FMUs and
IA, and implement it on S2/2018.
28. Recommendations. Based on the conclusions presented above, the following actions
are recommended:
▪ PISU should work together with IA, such as BPHP, BPSKL, and BBTNBKDS for
sharing and discuss regarding AWP 2018, and 2019.
▪ All EA and IA should maximize the role of FMUs as “institution in charge/locus owner”
for supervise and monitor each sub-project, and discuss with PISU regarding
Environmental Safeguard aspects.
▪ There must fieldwork activity conducted in order to complete checklist for screening
or even for categorize the subproject. However, the screening and categorization of
should involve FMU’s, and in order to obtained the environmental permit should
obtained from BLHD whether SPPL or UKL/UPL.
SA Environmental Safehuards 15 FIP-110.0 REFERENCES
ADB, 2016. Project Administration Manual, 2016, Forest Investment Program – 1, Community-Focused
Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project.
ADB, 2016. Environmental Assesment Review Framework, Forest Investment Program – 1.
Community-Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project.
ADB Policy Paper, 2009, ADB Safeguard Policy Statement.
Government of Indonesia, Law No. 32/2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management.
Government of Indonesia, 2012. Government Regulation No. 27/2012 on Environmental Permit.
Ministry of Environmental and Forestry (MoEF), Government of Indonesia, 2012.
MoEF Regulation No. 5/2012 on Activities Requiring AMDAL Study.
MoEF Regulation No. 16/2012 on Guidance to prepare Environmental Documents.
MoEF Regulation No. 17/2012 concerning Public Participation and Information Disclosure in AMDAL
Process.
West Kalimantan Province Government, No. 7/1988 on Management and Conservation of the
Environment.
West Kalimantan Governor Decree No. 120/1989 on Environmental Quality Standards guide
environmental management at the provincial level.
National Standard of Indonesia, 2008. SNI 7313 – 2008, Maximum limit of pesticide residues on
agricultural product
SA Environmental Safehuards 16 FIP-1APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Proposed Location of Agroforestry and Rubber
Plantation in Radin Jaya VillageAppendix 1: Proposed Location of Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation in Radin Jaya Village
Appendix 2 Official Minutes of Public Consultation
Appendix 2: Official Minutes of Public Consultation
Official Minute – Radin Jaya Village
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------Official Minute – Kayu Dujung Village ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
Official Minute – Senangan Jaya Village ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------
Official Minute – Senangan Kecil Village ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
Official Minute – Tanjung Sari Village ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------
Appendix 3 Public Consultation
Appendix A3 Public Consultation
Senangan Jaya Village (12/April/2018) Senangan Kecil Village (13/April/2018)
Signing Of Minuttes in Senangan Jaya
(13/April/2018) Radin Jaya Village (13/April/2018)
Pubic Consultation of Agroforestry, in Radin Jaya Public Consultation of Agroforestry, in Radin
Village (21/May/2018) Jaya Village (21/May/2018)Appendix 4 GRM Scheme and Complaint Form (GRM)
Appendix 4 A: GRM Scheme and Complaint Form (GRM)
Affected Person (AP)/
GPP (Site Level)
Affected Household (AH)
Step (2)
Step (1)
Complaint Registration (Fill in
Complaint Form)
Verification (Complaint
Material/content)
Valid
Yes Discuss in Village Level
(7 Days)
(Step 3)
No Solution Reached
Yes Discuss in Sub-District Level
(14 Days) Court
(Step 4)
No Solution Reached
Complaint has Solved
and mitigation has Discuss in District Level
Yes
implemented (14 Days)
(Step 5)
No Solution Reached
Yes
Discuss in Provincial Level
(22 Days)
(Step 6)
No Solution Reached
Discuss in MoEF
Yes Government Of Indonesia
(22 Days) No Solution Reached
(Step 7)
AP = Affected Person, AH = Affected Household, GPP = Grievance Point PersonAppendix 4 B : Complaint Form ADB FIP-1
Filled by PISU FIP-1 (Village Facilitator):
Complaint No. Date:
Informer
Source/s sms/e-mail/postmail/fax/phone/visit/others: .....................
Filled by Informer
Informer Detail:
Name :
Address :
Phone :
Fax :
E-mail :
Complaint Information
Location :
Programme :
Reporter Party :
Date of Occurrence :
Contents of Complaint:
(Complete with evidence or related documents)
(If this part is not enough, you can use additional paper)
Name and Signature of
Date:
Informer
Name and Signature
Recipient of the Complaint Date:
Information:
Forms are made in 2 copies: 1 (one) sheet for Informer and second sheet for archives.Appendix 5 Environmental Impact Assessment
and Mitigation Action PotentialAppendix 5: Environmental Impact Assesment and Mitigation Action Potential
Impact, Mitigation Plan, and Implemented in 2018
Key-Projects Activities Phase Potential Impact Mitigation Plan Implemented on S1/2018
Agroforestry Pre-Construction Phase
(75 ha) and
Rubber ▪ Land Preparation (site ▪ The Status of land’s ownerships and ▪ Conduct socialization to the beneficiaries of ▪ Socialization and agreement
Plantation 20 Selection) permission can create potential conflict Agroforestry benefits, so all community regarding key-project –
ha between the local community and the groups can receive the activity. completed (poured in official
program itself. ▪ Coordinate with local government to get minute of letter)
▪ Poor selection of plantation sites could the clearance/permit of land/region where ▪ Permit/Clearance from
lead to land clearing and habitat loss. Agroforestry Activity take place. Directorate of General
▪ Implemented in Degraded Area PSKL
▪ Land Clearing ▪ Land clearing is estimated to cause ▪ No specific land clearing programmed Not Started
permanent or temporary disturbances, under land-based activities before plant
and damage existing vegetation (for ation establish ment and land clear ing will
example, use of herbicides for round up, be minimized during operations
or activity of burning), will disrupt animal ▪ Activities need to be stopped if protected
traces, wipe out small animal and plants, species (as defined by Government
increase overland flow and soil erosion, Regulation No.7 / 1999, and MoEF No
or incurs a soil nutrient loss. 20/2018, concerning Wildlife and Animal
▪ The remaining land clearing, which is Conservation and Red List IUCN) are
debris/crumbs, can increase the risk of found during land rehabilitation work.
forest fires. ▪ The remnants of land clearing must be
collected and transferred to other place or
put in together garbage dump.
▪ Seed Selection ▪ Introduce a New Species, will predicted ▪ Select local seed for used in Agroforestry Not Started
can disturb local biodiversity condition. and Rubber Plantation (it will suitable with
the local environment)
▪ Build temporary shelters for nurseries near
Agroforestry areas.
▪ Material and Seed ▪ The distribution of Material and seed for ▪ Using alternative transportation that is Not Started
Distribution 75 ha and 20 ha will need a heavy environmentally friendly (for example:
transportation such as truck, and it will using animals as a carrier, or participation
predicted to increase air pollution.Key-Projects Activities Phase Potential Impact Mitigation Plan Implemented on S1/2018
▪ Needs of road in order to distribute of local community to move seed from
material or seed, so it can increase runoff truck to Agroforestry area).
and devastate plant habitat. ▪ shorten the distance between the nursery
▪ If the area near the protected forest, it and Agroforestry land
can predict to disturb animal, or devastate
plants habitat.
Construction Phase
▪ Land Practices ▪ Poor land clearing practices could ▪ Implement site-appropriate agroforestry Not Started
increase soil erosion and soil nutrient loss. management practices to reduce erosion
▪ Land Practices estimated to change land (e.g., terracing, silt pitting, and bunding),
surface and increase run off capacity. enrich soils (e.g., leguminous cover plants
▪ between the rows to assist with nitrogen
fixation), and improve soil physical
properties (e.g., moisture retention and
infiltration).
▪ Planting Activities ▪ Planting Activities Estimated to threaten ▪ Needs for close supervision regarding the Not Started
the existence of protected flora and fauna invasion of plant seeds that can interfere
(endangered species) with endemic species in the region.
▪ If the planting activity near protected forest ▪ It is necessary to monitor labor, which will
it will threaten an endemic species. carry out Agroforestry activities to not take
▪ Workers who will carry out planting actions that threaten the existence of
activities are expected to pose a threat to biodiversity in the protected forest such as
the flora and fauna in the protected forest. hunting, disturbing, or even forest
encroachment activities.
Operasional Phase
▪ Carry out the remaining ▪ It is estimated that it will have a potential ▪ The remnants of land clearing must be Not Started
material (such polybag, impact due to the accumulation of residual collected and transferred to other place or
stake, etc) plant material put in together garbage dump.
▪ Maintain Plant Growth by ▪ Excess fertilizer use could damage soils, ▪ Use SNI approved fertilizers. Not Started
giving pesticide and fertilizer pollute water supplies for biodiversity and ▪ Prioritize the use of organic fertilizers.
humans, and directly or indirectly
▪ Periodically monitor the nutrient state of the
endanger the health of the residents,
plants and the soil quality to determine
livestock, crops, and wild animals.Key-Projects Activities Phase Potential Impact Mitigation Plan Implemented on S1/2018
▪ The use of inorganic fertilizers is thought correct level of fertilizer application;. Do not
to cause soil and water pollution around over fertilize.
the planting area. ▪ Agroforestry activities are directed at using
▪ The use of pesticide without the right organic fertilizer. For the beginning of
measurement can create land and water planting (1 year early) can use inorganic
pollution surround the area. fertilizer that is Indonesian National Certified
(SNI), but the next year is required to use
organic fertilizer (or replacing with
composting waste vegetation).
▪ Using Standard and Registered Pesticide
(Regulation of pesticide use must be based
on SNI 7313 – 2008)
▪ During the maintenance phase the plant is
kept clean so as not to pollute the soil and
water around it.
Land Pre-Construction phase
Rehabilitation
(Rubber ▪ Land Preparation (Site ▪ Poor selection of plantation sites could ▪ Implement plantation activity only in ▪ Sosialization and
Plantation) 20 Selection) lead to land clearing and habitat loss. degraded areas, agreement regarding key-
ha ▪ Land Status has predicted will arise the ▪ Public consultation required to the project – completed
potential risk. beneficiaries of Land Rehabilitation benefits, ▪ Permit/Clearance from
▪ Poor coordination with local government so the activity can be received by all Directorate of General
can create potential conflict between the community groups. PSKL
local community and the program itself. ▪ Coordinate with local government to get the
▪ Land clearing is estimated to cause clearance/permit of land/region where
temporary or even permanent Rubber Plantation Activity take place.
disturbances, and threaten the existing ▪ Activities need to be stopped if protected
vegetation (for example, use of herbicides species (as defined by Government
for round up, or activity of burning) in a big Regulation No.7 / 1999, and MoEF No
scale, will disrupt animal habitat, wipe out 20/2018, concerning Wildlife and Animal
small animal and plants, increase overland Conservation and Red List IUCN) are found
flow and soil erosion. during land rehabilitation work.
▪ The activity can cause a soil nutrient loss. ▪ The remnants during land clearing must be
The remaining land clearing, which is collected and transferred to other place or
debris/crumbs, can increase the risk of put in together garbage dump.
forest fires.Key-Projects Activities Phase Potential Impact Mitigation Plan Implemented on S1/2018
▪ Selection seed of Rubber ▪ Use of non-local seeds results in poorly ▪ Select local seeds for plantations, to Not Started
for 20 ha adapted plantations and loss of local maintain local biodiversity and ensure that
biodiversity. plants are adapted to local conditions.
▪ Material and Seed ▪ The distribution of Material and seed for ▪ Prepared temporary shelters for nurseries Not Started
Distribution 50 ha will need a heavy transportation near Plantation areas.
such as truck, and it will have predicted to ▪ using alternative transportation that is
increase air pollution. environmentally friendly (for example:
▪ needs road in order to distribute material using animals as a carrier, or participation
or seed, so it can increase runoff and of local community to move seed from
devastate plant habitat truck to Plantation area).
▪ If the area near the protected forest, it ▪ shorten the distance between the nursery
can predict to disturb animal, or devastate and Plantation area
plants habitat.
Construction phase
▪ Land Practices ▪ Land Practices are estimated to change ▪ Implement site-appropriate Rubber Not Started
land surface and increase run off Plantation management practices to
capacity. reduce erosion and run off capacity.
▪ Poor farm practices, related to ▪ Land clearing or cleaning for plantations
management of vegetation debris, could will be avoided or minimized.
increase the risk of fire. ▪ Apply an appropriate waste management
system for vegetation debris (e.g., compost
the debris and use as fertilizer or soil
conditioner).
▪ Planting Activities ▪ Planting Activities Estimated to threaten ▪ Needs for close supervision regarding the Not Started
the existence of protected flora and invasion of plant seeds that can interfere
fauna (endangered species) with endemic species in the region.
▪ If the planting activity near protected ▪ It is necessary to monitor labor, which will
forest it will threaten an endemic carry out land rehabilitation activities to not
species. take actions that threaten the existence of
▪ Workers who will carry out planting biodiversity in the protected forest such as
activities are expected to pose a threat hunting, disturbing, or even forest
to the flora and fauna in the protected encroachment activities
forest.Key-Projects Activities Phase Potential Impact Mitigation Plan Implemented on S1/2018
. Operational Phase
▪ Carry out the remaining ▪ Poor farm practices, related to ▪ The remnants after planting activity must Not Started
material (such polybag, management of vegetation debris, could be collected and transferred to other place
stake) increase the risk of fire. or put in together garbage dump.
▪ It is estimated that it will have a potential ▪ Replacing with composting waste
impact due to the accumulation of vegetation. Regulation of pesticide use
residual plant material must be based on SNI.
▪ During the maintenance phase the plant is
kept clean so as not to pollute the soil and
water around it.
▪ Maintain Plant Growth by ▪ Pesticide without the right measurement ▪ Avoid the use of inorganic pesticides. Not Started
giving pesticide and fertilizer can create land and water pollution ▪ Avoid using herbicides.
surround the area.
▪ Apply only SNI certified pesticides.
▪ Non-organic fertilizers is thought to cause
▪ Collect and correctly manage pesticide
soil and water pollution around the
wastes (e.g., excess chemical or
planting area.
packaging must be sent to a central
facility).
▪ Rubber Plantation activities are directed at
using organic fertilizer. For the beginning of
planting (1 year early) can use inorganic
fertilizer that is Indonesian National
Certified (SNI), but the next year is required
to use organic fertilizer.
Micro Hydro
Power Plant Pre-Construction Activities.
(40 KW)
▪ Land Preparation (Site ▪ Poor Selection of location could lead to ▪ Conduct a Feasibility Study and Detail In - Progress
Selection) habitat loss and biodiversity disturbances Engineering Design.
▪ Poor consideration of land status and ▪ Obtain Permit in Protected Forest (IPPKH)
ownerships could arise a potential conflict ▪ Needs Clearance from local Authority
(PIPPIB)
▪ Land Clearing ▪ Land clearing is estimated could lead to ▪ No specific land clearing programmed Not-Started
temporary or permanent disturbances, and under land-based activities before
damage existing vegetation (for example, Construction establishment and landKey-Projects Activities Phase Potential Impact Mitigation Plan Implemented on S1/2018
use of herbicides for round up, or activity of clearing will be minimized during
burning), will disrupt animal traces, wipe operations.
out small animal and plants, increase
overland flow and soil erosion, or incurs a
soil nutrient loss.
Construction Phase
▪ Material Distribution ▪ The distribution of turbin and pipes ▪ Prepare the laydown area, near Not-Started
Material ha will need a heavy construction site.
transportation such as truck, and it will ▪ Rearrange the schedule settings and the
predicted to increase air pollution (dust maximum amount of transportation of tools
particle). and materials
▪ ▪ Participation of local community in order to
carry- out the material
▪ Build the Inspection Road ▪ Air Pollution and surface run off predicted ▪ Create drainage channel in order to Not-Started
to increase during the build of inspection minimize the surface run off.
road.
▪ Assembling turbin and ▪ Water quality predicted to decrease during ▪ Builds the temporary water storage to Not-Started
generator the construct ion supply water during the construction
activity
▪ Monitoring water quality continually.
Operational Activities
▪ Turbin operational ▪ Water availability fluctuates too much, ▪ Correctly site micro hydropower to Not-Started
causing power generation issues (electric avoid water availability problems.
force will be weakened if the source of the ▪ Promote reforestation in upstream of
water fluctuates too much). the river/stream to avoid reduction of water
flow
▪ Maintenance Activities ▪ Oil spill and paints during the maintain of ▪ Close Supervise during maintenance Not-Started
turbin/generator can decrease water quality activity.
▪ Water quality monitoring every 6 month.You can also read
