Infill Checklist Part 1 - Landmark Preservation
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Community Planning & Development
Infill Checklist Part 1
Landmark Preservation
1/4/16
Infill Part 1: Mass, Form & Context Checklist
The purpose of this step is to review the building envelope and basic exterior appearance concept to ensure a contextual fit.
3052 & 3056 Champa St.
Project Address: _________________________________________________________________________________________
10/20/2020
Pre-Application Date: ____________________________________________________________________________________
Curtis Park Neighbors DRC
Registered Neighborhood Organization: ___________________________________________________________________
09/08/2020
Meeting Held Date: ______________________________________________________________________________________
REQUIRED for Mass, Form, and Context Review:
Note: All drawings must have a scale, and the scale must be accurate printed out at a maximum 11” x 17” size.
All plans must be clearly labeled with hightlighted titles.
q
✔
1. Complete Application for Design Review
q 2. Complete Infill Checklist Part 1
✔
q 3. Digital submission of all required documentation
✔
q 4. Site plan with scale (1” = 40’ or larger if possible). Include existing/proposed driveways and curb cuts. Show mechanical
✔
equipment locations. Include spot elevations delineated at existing grade. (This is required to establish the base elevation,
and evaluate height within the historic context and ensure that the ordinance-prescribed height limits for the project are
met.)
q
✔
5. Interior floor plans with scale (1” = 40’ or larger if possible). Include all levels/floors. Please omit any/all furniture from the
plan and use simple room titles (bedroom, bathroom, etc.).
q 6. Color photos of existing conditions, clearly labeled showing proposed building site and surroundings.
✔
q
✔
7. Worksheets for Context, Composision, and components of Proposed Infill (Attached):
q✔
Ground Plan Comparison is a plan sheet providing footprint sizes and street/side setbacks for the immediate and
adjacent block face(s).
q Streetscape Drawings compare the size & dimensions of a building in elevation to other buildings on the same block
✔
face(s).
q✔
Compatibility Demonstration compares the proposed structure with existing historic structures in the area. This can be
any contributing structure in teh district boundary, not just adjacent structures.
q
✔
Character Defining Features is a detailed comparison of the proposal and the district’s Character Defining Features.
q 8. Isometric Drawings (3D), should be provided at key public/street level views and at an average pedestrian height.
✔
Additional aerial view isometric drawings are required if the entire building mass is not evident by public level views.
Note: A physical model may be provided to compliment, but not substitute, for isometric drawings.
q
✔
9. Elevations with overall dimensions and floor/ceiling heights denoted; show window/door openings; demarcate porches,
awnings, and major protrusions or indentations. Provide at least 1” = 30’ scale. No materials, siding or other details unless
important to denote scale or to distinguish solid and void surfaces.
q 10. Other (as required by staff ). _________________________________________________________________________________.
Coordinate with staff to determine if any additional information is needed due to the unique circumstances of your project.
For multi-unit (three [3] or more units) or commercial structures, also include:
q 11. Street sections for each distinct building mass, 1” = 20’ scale or larger. Width should extend from the center of ROW to
at least the front 15’ depth of building. Demarcate property line and street edge. Show all façade height step backs,
indentations and major protursions, such as awnings, balconies, etc.
Please note: Signage and outdoor seating are separate reviews.
201 W. Colfax Ave., Dept. 205
Denver, CO 80202
720.865.2709 or landmark@denvergov.org
Community Planning & Development
Application
Landmark Preservation
LANDMARK CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS – Application 3/15/16
Design review for this project will not begin until a complete application and required submittal materials are received. Landmark Preservation reserves
the right to delay consideration and/or action on a submittal in the event that information is missing and/or changed at the time of the scheduled de-
sign review or public hearing. Please use the appropriate project checklist for guidance. A pre-application review is required first for certain projects.
SUBJECT PROPERTY INFORMATION
Property Address 3052 & 3056 Champa St.
Property Type/Use q 1 or 2 Unit Building (Single Family Home, Duplex)
✔ Historic District
q Commercial Curtis Park
q Multi-Unit Residential q Other
Applicant Name: Nathan
& Cameron Laudick Street: 6324 Xavier Ct.
Company:
Laudick & Laudick Engineering, LLC City: Arvada
Phone:
419-203-5000 Zip: 80003
Email nathan@laudickeng.com
ITEMIZED LISTING OF PROPOSED WORK ITEMS - only listed items will be reviewed:
[Example: Replace roof shingles, Construct 2-car detached garage, etc.] Only work listed below will be considered.
q New Construction (2 houses) q
q New Garages with ADUs q
q q
Materials of work:
(Example: Type of window materials, siding, roofing, etc.)
q
q
q
Amount of demolition of original features/materials
q
0 square feet
APPLICATIONS ARE NOT CONSIDERED COMPLETE UNTIL ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED ON THE
APPROPRIATE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST IS SUBMITTED
I attest that no additional exterior work or window work will occur under this application (sign, and print application).
Design Review Deadline: The filing deadline is 4 weeks prior to scheduled Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) meetings, and 23 days (3 weeks and 2 days)
prior to the first Thursday o
f each month for the Lower Downtown Design Review Board (LDDRB). A complete application, including full supporting documentation, is
due in the Landmark Preservation office by 12:00pm (noon) on the filing deadline. Landmark staff will determine whether LPC or LDDRB review is required based on
adopted design guidelines. Staff will contact the applicant regarding staff comments, meeting dates (if applicable) and any additional materials that may be required.
To submit electronically: Email this form and supporting materials to landmark@denvergov.org. Electronic submission should include two attachments: one pdf with
the completed form (“yourname-app.pdf”) and one pdf that combines all supporting materials (“yourname-app-materials.pdf”). File s ize should not exceed 25MB
combined. Contact us if you are having trouble with your electronic submission.
To submit in person: Submit this form and supporting materials to the Records Counter weekdays between 7:30am and 4:30pm on t he 2nd floor of the Webb Munici-
pal Building, 201 W. Colfax Ave.
All submittals become the property of the City & County of Denver. Submittals are open records.
Submittals will be posted online or made available to any party that requests a copy. 201 W. Colfax Ave., Dept. 205
Denver, CO 80202
720.865.2709 or landmark@denvergov.org
HOMES FOR BROTHERS
3056 CHAMPA STREET
3052 CHAMPA STREET
DENVER, CO 80205
LANDMARK PART 1 SUBMITTAL
ARCHITECTURE
LM.00 COVER
LM.01 SITE PLAN
LM.02 PLANS
LM.03 PLANS
LM.04 ADU PLANS
LM.05 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
LM.06 GROUND PLAN COMPARISON
LM.07 STREETSCAPE
LM.08 STREETSCAPE
LM.09 COMPATABILITY
LM.10 COMPATABILITY
LM.11 CHARACTER DEFINING FEATURES
LM.12 3D VIEWS
LM.013 ELEVATIONS
LM.014 ELEVATIONS
LM.015 ELEVATIONS
LM.016 SOLAR
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS INFILL PART 1:
1. SITE PLAN
2. INTERIOR FLOOR PLANS
3. COLOR PHOTOS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
4. WORKSHEET
A. GROUND PLAN COMPARISON (FOOTPRINT SIZES AND STREET / SIDE
SETBACKS FOR IMMEDIATE AND ADJACENT BLOCK FACES
B. STREETSCAPE DRAWINGS (COMPARE THE SIZE AND DIMENSIONS
OF A BUILDING IN ELEVATION TO OTHER BUILDINGS ON THE SAME
BLOCK)
C. COMPATABILITY DEMONSTRATION (COMPARE PROPSED TO
EXISTING HISTORIC STRUCTURES IN THE AREA)
D. CHARACTER DEFINING FEATURES (DETAILS COMPARISON OF THE
PROPOSAL AND THEDISTRICTS CHARACTER DEFINING FEATURES)
5. ISOMETRIC DRAWINGS
6. ELEVATIONS
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us
LM.00
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 COVER
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.
ADJACENT STRUCTURE
EXISTING TRASH
ENCLOSURE
LOT 5 WINDOW WELL w/ COVER @ EGRESS WINDOW
ROUND COLUMN
CHAMPA STREET
3'-0" SETBACK
172 SF RAISED (+18") and
15'-0 1/8"
PARTIALLY COVERED
CONCRETE PORCH
ZONE LOT WIDTH
5'-0" SETBACK GARAGE
ALLEY
PROPOSED GARAGE
COVERED REAR PATIO
187 SF RAISED (+24")
CONCRETE DW3056 CHAMPA / ADU 448 SF
25.02'
PAVER LOT 6 FOOTPRINT
WALK TO
SIDEWALK
HOUSE PROPOSED RESIDENCE NO ROOF
CURB and 1116 SF FOOTPRINT OVERHANG
ENTRANCE
GUTTER
7'-10"
PORCH NO ROOF OVERHANG
3'-0" SETBACK A/C
8'-0" WINDOW WELL w/ COVER @ EGRESS WINDOW
PORCH ENCROACHMENT DOWNSPOUT TO SPLASHBLOCK, MAINTAIN DOWNSPOUT TO SPLASHBLOCK,
EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN TO STREET MAINTAIN EXISTING DRAINAGE
WATER METER 20'-0" PATTERN TO ALLEY
BLOCK SENSITIVE SETBACK FRONT 65% REAR 35%
81.47' 43.87'
125.34'
ZONE LOT DEPTH
LOT 7 (VACANT)
3052 CHAMPA
LOT 8
DW
PROPOSED RESIDENCE PROPOSED GARAGE
1116 SF FOOTPRINT / ADU 448 SF
FOOTPRINT
NO ROOF OVERHANG
NO ROOF
OVERHANG
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us
3/32" = 1'-0"
LM.01
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 0' 8' 24' 48'
SITE PLAN
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.
18'-8" 18'-8"
5'-7 1/2" 13'-0 1/2" 5'-7 1/2" 13'-0 1/2"
4'-0"
primary bedroom front room
12'-10"
12'-1"
12'-1"
12'-1"
12'-3 1/4"
22'-1 1/2"
3'-5" 5'-0" 9'-4"
7'-6"
3'-6 1/2"
WC
2'-7"
3'-0"
powder
4'-10"
4'-10"
6'-11 1/2"
rec room
pantry
5'-10 1/4"
R3
9'-4 1/2"
UP
'-3
3'-7 1/2"
"
kitchen
UP
5'-0"
UP
DW
5'-7" 4'-6"
5'-10 1/2"
5'-7 1/2"
5'-0"
61'-0"
61'-0"
61'-0"
14'-4"
4'-6"
3'-8 1/2" 3'-6"
8'-3 1/2"
WH FURN
8'-0"
laundry 5'-0"
5'-3 1/2" WC
DN
38'-10 1/2"
5'-1"
28'-10 1/2"
4'-3"1'-1 1/2" 5'-1"
bed room
22'-5 1/2"
bed room
WC
great room
5'-6 1/2"
bed room WC storage
EQ EQ
UPPER LEVEL - LM LOWER LEVEL - LM
3 1/8" = 1'-0" 18'-8" 1 1/8" = 1'-0"
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us
LM.02
MAIN LEVEL - LM 1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 2 1/8" = 1'-0"
PLANS
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.
OPEN TO BEDROOM
BELOW
DN
bonus room
deck
RAILING
PLANTER @ PERIMETER
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792 ARCHITECTURAL ROOF - LM HALF STORY - LM
anthony@mues.us 2 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 1/8" = 1'-0"
LM.03
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 PLANS
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.
ADU SHED PLATE
116'-0 7/8"
24'-0"
ADU FLOOR
107'-11 3/4" 3'-0" 3'-0"
SB SB
GARAGE
98'-10"
GARAGE SOUTH (LEFT) ELEVATION - LM GARAGE EAST (FRONT) ELEVATION - LM GARAGE NORTH (RIGHT) ELEVATION - LM
6 1/8" = 1'-0"
4 1/8" = 1'-0"
5 1/8" = 1'-0"
18'-8"
2'-4"
UP
WC
12" / 12" 12" / 12"
24'-0"
2" / 12" 2" / 12"
21'-8"
adu garage
DW
GARAGE NORTH (REAR) ELEVATION - LM
7 1/8" = 1'-0"
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us ADU ROOF - LM ADU FLOOR - LM GARAGE - LM
3 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 1/8" = 1'-0"
LM.04
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 ADU PLANS
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.
30th STREET
31st STREET
VIEW OF LOTS / BLOCK LOOKING SOUTH EAST. ALL LOTS ARE VACANT WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CORNER AT CHAMPA AND 31st
CHAMPA STREET
METSTIZO - CURTIS PARK ACROSS STREET TO NORTH WEST
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us
LM.05
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.
TYPICAL SETBACK
ALONG CHAMPA
RK
PA
IS
RT
U
-C
ZO
TI
ES
56
30
M
52
30
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us
LM.06
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 GROUND PLAN COMPARISON
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.
3162 CHAMPA 3160 CHAMPA 3154 CHAMPA 3148 CHAMPA 3142 CHAMPA 3138 CHAMPA 3134 CHAMPA 3130 CHAMPA 3126 CHAMPA 3122 CHAMPA 3114 CHAMPA 829 31st
FND: 2'-6" FND: 1' FND: 1' FND: 1' FND: 2' FND: 1' FND: N/A FND: N/A FND: N/A FND: 2'-4" FND: 1' FND: 3'-6"
DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 6'8" DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 6'-8"
2ND FLR: 12'-10" 2ND FLR: 11'-10" 2ND FLR: N/A 2ND FLR: N/A 2ND FLR: 12' 2ND FLR: N/A 2ND FLR: N/A 2ND FLR: N/A 2ND FLR: N/A 2ND FLR: 14'-0" 2ND FLR: 12'-3" 2ND FLR: 12'
MAX: 24'-10" MAX: 29' MAX: 16' MAX: 16' MAX: 29' MAX: 19'-4" MAX: 17'-6" MAX: 17'-7" MAX: 19'-4" MAX: 30'-10" MAX: X MAX: 31'-6"
PROPERTY LINE, TYPICAL
2960 CHAMPA 2956 CHAMPA 2952 CHAMPA 2948 CHAMPA 2946 CHAMPA 2938,2936 CHAMPA 2924 CHAMPA 2922 CHAMPA 2918 CHAMPA 2914 CHAMPA 2900 CHAMPA
FND: N/A FND: 2'-4" FND: 2'-8" FND: 1'-7" FND: 2' FND: 2'-6" FND: 2'-4" FND: 2'8" FND: 2' FND: 2'-6" FND: 2'-6"
DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 7' DOOR: 7' DOOR: 7'-4" DOOR: 6'-8" DOOR: 7' DOOR: 8' DOOR: 7'
2ND FLR: N/A 2ND FLR: N/A 2ND FLR: 14' 2ND FLR: 13'-5" 2ND FLR: 12'-10" 2ND FLR: 13' 2ND FLR: 11'-4" 2ND FLR: 12' 2ND FLR: 11'-10" 2ND FLR: 11'-10" 2ND FLR: 11'
MAX: 13'-10" MAX: 20' MAX: 29' MAX: 27'-2" MAX: 29'-6" MAX: 30' MAX: 25' MAX: 28' MAX: 24'-6" MAX: 31' MAX: 31'-7"
1
3056 CHAMPA 3052 CHAMPA LM.08
LOT 6 LOT 8
LOT 10 (VACANT)
LOT 11 (VACANT)
LOT 12 (VACANT)
LOT 13 (VACANT)
LOT 14 (VACANT)
LOT 15 (VACANT)
LOT 16 (VACANT)
LOT 7 (VACANT)
LOT 9 (VACANT)
30TH STREET
31ST STREET
FND: 1'-8" (RANGE 1' to 2'-8") FND: 1'-8" THE STREETSCAPE ALONG CURTIS IS FULL OF HOMES OF VARYING HEIGHTS. OFTEN A TALLER HOME IS ADJACENT TO A SHORTER HOME. WHEN THIS OCCURS THE
DOOR: 8'-0" (RANGE 6'-8" to 7') DOOR: 8'-0" TALL HOME'S EAVE IS NEAR OR ABOVE THE RIDGE LINE OF THE ADJACENT HOME. THIS PATTERN IN THE INSPIRATION FOR THE HEIGHT OF 3056 & 3052 CHAMPA.
2ND FLR: 11'-2" (RANGE 11' to 14') 2ND FLR: 11'-2" NOTE THAT THE EAVE STARTS NEAR THE PARAPET OF THE ADJACENT BUILDING.
MAX: 33'-4" (RANGE 13'-10 to 31'-7") MAX: 33'-4"
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us
LM.07
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 STREETSCAPE
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.HALF STORY
120'-3 1/2"
33'-4"
30'-6 1/4"
29'-10 1/2"
PER SDP
24'-3 1/4"
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR
111'-1 3/4"
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR
100'-0"
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us
LM.08
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 STREETSCAPE
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.CURTIS PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT: CHARACTER DEFINING FEATURES KEY INSPIRATION IMAGES
MASS AND FORM:
BUILDING HEIGHT: ONE TO TWO STORIES IN HEIGHT. RAISED 2640 CURTIS STREET 2603 CURTIS 2625 CALIFORNIA
FOUNDATIONS AND TALL CEILING HEIGHTS PROVIDE FOR TALL HOUSES, OVER STREET STREET
30 FEET HIGH, ON SOME BLOCKS. TALL 2.5 STORY,
PRIMARY MASS WITH TALL, 3 STORY, TALL, 3 STORY,
BUILDING SHAPES: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ARE PREVALENT WITH GABLE ROOF. ENTRY FORM. STACKED FORM. STACKED
MULTI-FAMILY ROW HOUSES AND DUPLEX FORMS INTERMIXED. MASSING IS STEPPED BACK. OTHER LARGE PLATE WINDOWS IN
BLOCKY AND RECTANGULAR ON MOST HOMES, ALTHOUGH PROJECTING BAYS, ROOFS RECESS TO THE WINDOWS IN THE GROUPSING OF 2
CORNER TOWERS AND ASYMMETRICAL FORMS ARE ALSO COMMON ON LARGER BACKGROUND. ROOF FOREMOST AND 3 INVOKE A
TWO-STORY HOMES AND BUILDINGS. WITH RAILING ABOVE VOLUME WHICH STRONG VERTICAL
MAIN WINDOWS INPSIRE THE ELEMENT WHICH
MATERIALS: STRONG FONT INSPIRES THE WALL
PREDOMINATELY UNPAINTED BRICK CONSTRUCTION WITH A SMALL GABLE AND WALL OF GLASS IN THE
NUMBER OF STONE AND FRAME STRUCTURES. FOUNDATIONS ARE OF GLASS IN THE PROPOSED DESIGN
TYPICALLY BRICK OR STONE. BRICK STRUCTURES ARE TYPICALLY SMOOTH PROPOSED DESIGN
CUT, EARTH-TONE ORANGE BRICK. WOOD SIDING, PORCHES AND DETAILS
ROOFS:
HIPPED AND FAT ROOFS TYPICAL ON THE ITALIANATE-STYLE BUILDINGS
WHILE QUEEN ANNE AND EASTLAKE STYLE HOUSES TYPICALLY FEATURE
A FRONT GABLED ROOF, SOMETIMES WITH FARED ROOF EAVES. SOME
MANSARD, CONICAL, RAISED DECORATIVE PARAPETS AND COMPLEX
HIPPED AND GABLED ROOFS ARE ALSO FOUND. SOME ITALIANATE HOUSES
FEATURE BROAD OVERHANGING EAVES WITH DECORATIVE BRACKETS; A
FEW INCLUDE ORNAMENTAL IRON ROOF CRESTING. DORMERS ARE RARE. 2525 CHAMPA STREET
COMPOSITE SHINGLES ARE THE MOST FREQUENTLY USED MODERN
ROOFNG MATERIAL, IMITATING ORIGINAL WOOD SHINGLE ROOFS. TALL, 2.5 STORY, FORM. STACKED
WINDOWS IN GROUPSING OF 2 AND
ENTRIES AND DOORS: 3 INVOKE A STRONG VERTICAL
OFFSET FRONT ENTRIES ACCESSED BY RAISED PORCHES. WOODEN SINGLE ELEMENT WHICH INSPIRES THE WALL
AND DOUBLE DOORS COMMON; SOME ITALIANATE EXAMPLES FEATURE OF GLASS IN THE PROPOSED
NARROW DOUBLE DOORS. MOST ORIGINAL DOORS HAVE ONE OR TWO DESIGN
PANES OF GLASS ABOVE, WITH WOOD PANELING BELOW, ALTHOUGH
SOME DOORS ARE FULL PANELED. DOORS WITH TRANSOMS ARE COMMON;
SOME HAVE SIDELIGHTS. MULTI-FAMILY STRUCTURES HAVE SMALLER
PROJECTING PORCHES, STOOPS OR RECESSED ENTRIES.
WINDOWS:
INDIVIDUAL DOUBLE-HUNG, ONE-OVER-ONE WOOD WINDOWS
COMMON, ALTHOUGH FRAMED WINDOW PAIRS IN GABLE ENDS, 2825, 2662 CURTIS STREET
WINDOW TRANSOMS, AND OTHER VARIATIONS ARE ALSO FOUND. MOST 2662 CURTIS STREET
STRUCTURES FEATURE TALL NARROW WINDOWS, ALTHOUGH SOME PAIRED
AND ARCHED WINDOWS ARE WIDER AND MORE RECTANGULAR IN FORM. 2 TO 2.5 STORY HOMES, PITCHED ROOF, SMALL DECK
ROUNDED AND SEGMENTAL ARCHED LINTELS ARE COMMON, ALTHOUGH ABOVE ENTRANCE. SIDING w/ WOOD FRAME OR BRICK.
OTHER VARIATIONS SUCH AS WOODEN PEDIMENTED LINTELS, STONE DRIP
MOLDS AND HORIZONTAL STONE LINTEL BANDS ARE ALSO FOUND. HIGHLY
DECORATIVE MASONRY HEADERS AND LINTELS CONTRIBUTE TO BUILDING
ORNAMENTATION. HISTORICALLY, WINDOWS WERE RECESSED IN THE WALL 2656 CURTIS 2481 CHAMPA
(NOT FUSH).
DOOR STEPPED BACK DOOR STEPPED BACK
FROM FRONT FACADE. FROM FRONT FACADE.
HIPPED ROOF BEHIND HIPPED ROOF BEHIND
GABLE. (3) POSTS AT GABLE. STANDING
THIN ROOF OVER SEAM METAL ROOF
PORCH
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us
LM.09
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 COMPATABILITY
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.ADDITIONAL HOMES OVERALL INSPIRATION
2743 Curtis
2656 Curtis - 2ND LEVEL BALCONY
2603 Curtis - TALL FORM, EVOKES WALL OF GLASS
3219 Champa - GABLE TO HIP ROOF
2741 Champa - METAL ROOF
2524 Stout - GABLE TO HIP ROOF
3000 Stout - GABLE TO HIP ROOF
2858, 2775, 2625, 2611 California - SIMILAR
3219 CHAMPA 3000 STOUT 2858 CALIFORNIA 2741 STOUT
MODERN INFILL
HOMES WITH ORIGINAL METAL ROOF:
2445 California
2801 and 2905 Curtis
2741, 2545, 2535 Champa
2557 Stout
2741 CHAMPA 2557 STOUT 2741 CHAMPA
HISTORIC TWIN HOMES
716-718 25th St Edbrook
2925-2927 Champa
2634-2630 Curtis
2519-2523 California
2531-2537-2541 Curtis Italianates
2925-2927 CHAMPA TWINS 2531-2537-2541 CURTIS ITALIANATES
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us
LM.10
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 COMPATABILITY
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.12
"
12
EXCEEDS MAX
"/
"/
12
HEIGHT
12
"
TALL 2.5 STORY, PRIMARY MASS WITH GABLE ROOF. DOOR STEPPED BACK FROM
ENTRY STEPPED BACK FRONT FACADE. HIPPED ROOF
BEHIND GABLE. HIP ROOF
12
REDUCES SCALE PERCEIVED
"/
FROM THE STREET AND
12
"
REINFORCES GABLE FORM
TALL, 2.5 STORY, FORM. ROOF
TRANSITIONS TO ALLOW 2ND
SKYLIGHT STORY DECK IN REAR. PERIMETER
PLANTING ECHO ROOF CANOPY
AND OBSCURE
GUTTER
EXCEEDS BULK
PLANE
MODERN GLASS ELEMENT MULLIONS ENTRY DOOR STACKED ABOVE
ECHO HISTORIC WINDOW PATTERNS. DOOR BELOW
2.5 STORY HOME, SMALL
DECK ABOVE ENTRANCE
FRAME AT WINDOW. UTILIZED TO
CREATE DEPTH AND SHADOW AT
PRIMARY WINDOWS
STOREFRONT SYSTEM.
MULLIONS CREATES PANES
DECK RAILING.
OF GLASS WHICH REFLECT
THE 2x+ TALLER THAN WIDE
WINDOW PATTERN FOUND
THROUGHOUT THE DISTRICT.
PORCH COVER
ENTRY DOOR
(3) ROUND COLUMNS
REFERENCE THE TURNED
WOOD COLUMNS OFTEN
USED ON ORIGINAL HOMES
IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
A/C
RAISED (+18") PATIO AND
FOUNDATION.
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792 FRONT (NORTH) ELEVATION - CHARACTER
anthony@mues.us DEFINING
1 1/4" = 1'-0"
LM.11
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 CHARACTER DEFINING FEATURES
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us
LM.12
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 3D VIEWS
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.12
"
NOTE: WE ARE REQUSTING AN EXCEPTION TO THE BULK PLANE
12
EXCEEDS MAX
"/
/ BUILDING HEIGHT. CHARACTER DEFINING FEATURES OF THE
"/
12
HEIGHT
12
3'-4"
NEGHBORHOOD INCLUDE TALL HOUSES OVER 30' IN HEIGHT.
"
THE ITALIANATE HOME AT 29TH AND CHAMPA JUST DOWN THE
12
STREET IS AN EXAMPLE OF A TALL HOME WITH ROOFTOP DECK
"/
AS WELL.
12
"
SKYLIGHT
GUTTER
13'-0"
HALF STORY
EXCEEDS BULK
3'-9 5/8"
120'-3 1/2"
PLANE
UPPER LEVEL PLATE
BULK PLANE 119'-2 7/8"
UPPER WINDOWS
117'-9 3/4"
8'-1 1/8"
6'-8"
30'-0"
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR
111'-1 3/4"
PORCH COVER MAIN PLATE
110'-1 1/8"
MAIN WINDOWS
108'-8"
(3) 6" ROUND COLUMN GARAGE PLATE
17'-0"
POST 106'-11 1/8"
3'-0" 3'-0"
10'-1 1/8"
SETBACK SETBACK
8'-8"
RAISED PATIO
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR
1'-2 1/8"
100'-0"
TOW
98'-9 7/8"
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792 BASE PLANE ELEVATION: 5243.0' (5243.1 + 5242.9' / 2)
anthony@mues.us
FRONT (NORTH) ELEVATION - LM
1
LM.013
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 1/4" = 1'-0"
ELEVATIONS
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.FRIEZE BOARD
SKYLIGHT
PLANTER AT PERIMETER
GUTTER
HALF STORY
120'-3 1/2"
WINDOW
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR
111'-1 3/4"
PATIO COVER
MAIN PLATE
110'-1 1/8"
ROUND COLUMN POST GARAGE PLATE
106'-11 1/8"
RAISED PATIO
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR
100'-0"
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us
REAR (SOUTH) ELEVATION - LM
1 1/4" = 1'-0"
LM.014
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 ELEVATIONS
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.HALF STORY
120'-3 1/2"
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR
111'-1 3/4"
MAIN PLATE
110'-1 1/8"
MAIN WINDOWS
108'-8"
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR
100'-0"
RIGHT (WEST) ELEVATION - LM
2 1/8" = 1'-0"
HALF STORY
120'-3 1/2"
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR
111'-1 3/4"
MAIN PLATE
110'-1 1/8"
MAIN WINDOWS
108'-8"
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR
100'-0"
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us LEFT (EAST) ELEVATION - LM
1 1/8" = 1'-0"
LM.015
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 ELEVATIONS
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.N N N
June 21
8:26 PM 5:37 AM
AS
AS
AS
G
G
G
W E W 7:08 PM 7:06 AM March
E 21 W E
D
D
D
AS
AS
AS
W
W
W
G
G
G
12:00 PM
D
D
D
W
W
W
5:34 PM 8:23 AM
12:00 PM
December 22
12:00 PM
S S S
SUMMER SOLSTICE EQUINOX WINTER SOLSTICE
1 1" = 100'-0"
2 1" = 100'-0"
3 1" = 100'-0"
Anthony J. Ries, AIA
architecture firm
720.939.2792
anthony@mues.us
LM.016
1/06/2021
COPYRIGHT 2021
20-027 SOLAR
This document is an instrument of service, and as such remains the property of the Architect. Permission for use of this document is limited and can be extended only by written agreement with MUES, LLC.Keith Pryor
Design Review Chair
2418 Champa Street
Denver, Co 80205
November 22, 2020
Landmark Preservation Commission
Abigail Christman | Senior City Planner
Via email: abigail.christman@denvergov.org
Re 3052 and 3056 Champa
Dear Commission,
The Curtis Park Design Review committee has been working with the applicant and have reviewed the
proposed two houses and ADUs. We have made design suggestion along the way which the applicant has
listened to and for the most part they have incorporated them into the design.
Per the Character-Defining features of the Curtis Park Historic District, Building Height is front and center.
It states that Curtis Park has raised foundations and tall ceiling heights that provide for tall houses, over
30 feet high on some blocks. We feel the overall height of these two homes is appropriate and that they
should be approved for an administrative adjustment for allowing the penetration of the bulk plane which
will allow for a taller house which will fit better with the historic homes of Curtis Park.
The homes that the applicant references in their packet reflect the height we would like to see with these
two homes. The current proposed homes do have a raised foundation which meets guidelines 4.3, 4.4
and 4.10 A, B, D. The houses on this block need to look and relate to the adjoining blocks as the block
they sit on is currently a series on vacant land and non-contributing structures that are not indicative of
the heights and floor plates found in the Curtis Park Historic district.
We conditionally support the Mass and Scale of this application. We feel the overall height and massing
fit well with the Historic District and the surrounding blocks. The placement of the building and the overall
mass and height meets guidelines 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.21 and 4.22.
These two homes are a modern and simplified interpretation of a Queen Anne style that is common to
the Curtis Park Historic District. It is very minimalist, but draws from the Queen Anne in mass and scale.
It has the overall envelope of the Queen Anne with the correct roof pitch found on other homes in the
district. We support the protruding bay which is common and well as the recessed hip roof which is also
found in the district. Most notably the home at 2418 Champa. This home shows many of the elements
that the applicant is drawing inspiration from and similarities to in their design.
The main front bay with the glass wall is supported by the design committee. We feel it meets guidelines
4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7.The glass wall is a modern take on our brick wall. The windows are in the glass wall. However, we feel that the windows need further study and development as to the spacing, rhythm and definition of the windows in the glass wall that are typical of that found in the district. We feel this should be a condition for the approval of mass and scale. The floor plates are typical to those found in the district as well. Guideline 4.3 c, 4.4 c d e, 4.5 c, 4.6 b d, 4.8 a b c. We support the use of Metal in this application. Both on the roof as well as on the sides. Metal roofs are a common roofing material in the district and using it in a new way on the sides of the property meets guidelines 4.5 a b, 4.6 b c d. It is a quality material and one that works well in the district. We support the window patterns and size on the side and back of the properties. These are narrow lots and these will not be visible from the primary façade. The Skylights are supported as well. We do support the transition from a pitched roof to a flat roof of the rear of the property. This transition is typical of the district and many homes in the district have flat roof construction on the rear of the property. This was typically a kitchen or sleeping porch or early rear additions as the family grew and needed more space. We feel having a pitch roof in front that transitions to a flat roof matches the district and is a great way to create outdoor space on these small lots found in the district. We think this is a great alternative to having a flat roof home with a “Dog House” sitting on top of it which is not a form found in the district. Guideline 4.7 a We do support the design of the front porch. We feel it is simple yet creates a nod to the district. Some Queen Anne’s in the district do have a door on the second story to give access out to the roof of the front porch for an outdoor area. The best example of this is at the corner of 27th and Curtis. The post should be 6” in thickness and the metal should band should be solid to be a modern interpretation of historic elements. Guidelines 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 This is a modern home and one that does work with the district and we are conditionally supportive of the mass and scale application, with the condition that there be further study of the windows in the front façade. We feel the design does stay neutral to the district and does not detract from the district. We do want to address the issue of twin homes in the district. This type of development pattern was very typical of the district. This practice of building multiple houses of the same design goes back to the beginning of the Curtis Park Historic District. The very first application for historic designation in Curtis park was because two twin houses that were built by prominent brothers where to be torn down. These houses are at 716-718 25th St, they were designed by the Edbrook brothers who design many early Denver structures. Other historic twins are 2641-2649-2455 Champa, 2925-2927 Champa, 2634- 2630 Curtis, 2519-2523 California and 2531-2537-2541 Curtis. These are all great examples of families or Developers building identical houses on the same block. There are other examples of twin homes throughout Curtis Park as well. The commission has approved new construction that are duplicates as well. The four houses at the corner of 25th and Stout, two houses at 2530-2540 Stout, three at 3032- 3038-3040 California and two at 3040-3044 Stout. This type of twin development is a strong characteristic of the district and these two properties should be no exception.
We ask that the commission to conditionally approve the mass and scale for these two homes as outlined in this letter. Sincerely, Keith Pryor, Curtis Park Design Review Committee Chair
You can also read
