Impact of COVID-19 on public attitudes to engaging with the healthcare system
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Impact of COVID-19 on public attitudes to engaging with the healthcare system JULY 2020
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic is posing unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems across Europe. As the initial wave of the pandemic in Europe subsides, governments are considering how best to safely restart services. In order to assess public attitudes to using health services in a COVID-19 endemic world, as well as their priorities for the restarts, Incisive Health commissioned polling across France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. This briefing provides an overview of the key findings.
Fear of COVID-19 is impacting on people’s willingness to engage with the healthcare system Due to the risk of catching COVID-19, people remain “scared” to use health services, with fear of using secondary care services particularly notable. Just under half (49%) of respondents reported that they are scared to visit an A&E department, whilst 4 out of 10 (39%) are concerned about using an ambulance for the same reason. By comparison, only 24% feared a trip to the pharmacist due to the risk posed by the pandemic. Figure 1: “Due to the risk of catching COVID-19, I am scared to use the following health services”1 49% 42% 42% 39% 39% 34% Almost half of 32% respondents 27% 24% are “scared” of using emergency departments due to perceived risk of catching COVID-19 Hospital Hospital Dentist Ambulance GP Physiotherapy Private Other Pharmacy emergency based practice service practice specialist health department specialist service People in countries that have been hardest hit by the pandemic are most concerned about using hospital services. Figure 2 shows that 61% of respondents from Spain and 56% respondents from Italy reported fear of using A&E departments due to risk of catching COVID-19, whilst this was true for only 38% respondents from Germany. Figure 2: “Due to the risk of catching COVID-19, I am scared to use the following health services”1 67% 56% 51% 49% 49% 49% 47% 45% 45% 45% 42% 42% 43% 41% 40% 38% 37% 37% 37% 38% 35% 35% 33% 32% 30% UK Spain Germany France Italy Hospital Dentist Hospital Ambulance GP emergency practice based service practice department specialist
People are also reluctant to engage due to concerns that they will overburden health services during a time of crisis. As Figure 3 illustrates, 57% of respondents from Spain and 48% respondents from the UK reported that they are reluctant to visit their GP over concerns to take up their time and capacity. Again, concern about overburdening health services is significantly lower in Germany (37% for GP practices). Figure 3: “I am reluctant to use the following health services because I don’t want to take up their time and capacity during the pandemic”2 67% 63% 60% 60% 57% 56% 55% 52% 53% 50% 51% 48% 47% 48% 45% 42% 41% 41% 40% 37% UK Spain Germany France Italy Hospital GP Ambulance Hospital emergency practice service based department specialist The implications of reluctance to engage with health services are significant. The pandemic response has resulted in delays to the diagnosis and treatment of many patients and services will now be tasked with addressing this backlog. For example, data from the UK indicates that over 2 million people are now waiting for a cancer screening test, diagnosis or treatment.3 It will only be possible to manage this backlog if the public can be reassured that it is safe to use healthcare and that doing so will not place an unmanageable burden on services. Cancer services are the public’s priority for reopening the health system When it comes to reopening health systems, cancer services are the public’s top priority across Europe. More than half (54%) of respondents identified cancer screening and treatment as one of their top priorities. Cancer is a particular priority for people in Italy (62%), Spain (58%) and the UK (55%). By contrast 4 in 10 (43%) of respondents from Germany identified it as a priority. Cancer is the public’s top priority for reopening health services
Figure 4: In your opinion, which areas of health services should be prioritised when reopening the healthcare system?* 62% 58% 55% 53% 51% 43% 42% 39% 36% 35% 36% 34% 32% 31% 28% 29% 29% 27% 28% 25% 23% 24% 22% 21% 20% 20% 20% 19% 19% 16% UK Spain Germany France Italy Cancer Primary care Routine Appointments Mental Vaccination diagnosis services (e.g. operations (e.g. for long term health services & treatment GP practices) hip replacement) conditions support *Respondents were able to choose up to three priorities Primary care services were the second priority, selected by more than a third (38%) of respondents. Support for prioritising primary care was particularly strong in Spain (51%). It is notable that, despite the focus on discovering an effective vaccine for COVID-19, there was relatively little focus on reopening vaccination services. Telephone consultations preferred over face-to-face appointments for non-urgent medical advice A feature of the response to the Figure 5: pandemic has been the adoption If you needed non-urgent medical advice, what would of approaches to reduce the be your preferred method of receiving it? risk of exposure to infection, 1% such as moving to virtual appointments where possible. Telephone call appointment This is broadly supported by the 15% public, with just under one third Personal face-to-face (30%) of respondents preferring 30% appointment a telephone appointment, Online video just under a quarter (24%) 20% appointment still preferring a face-to-face Using online services appointment and one in five and/or apps to help 24% manage my health (20%) preferring a video call for a non-urgent appointment. Other
However, attitudes vary across countries. Figure 6 shows that more than a third (37%) of respondents in France say their preferred method of receiving non-urgent medical advice would still be a personal face-to-face appointment, compared to under a fifth (18%) of respondents in Italy who said the same. Figure 6: If you needed non-urgent medical advice, what would be your preferred method of receiving it? 38% 37% 34% 31% 31% Telephone 26% 27% 24% consultations 20% 20% 20% are preferred 17% 18% 17% 18% over face-to-face 15% 15% 13% 13% appointments for non-urgent 10% medical advice UK Spain Germany France Italy Telephone call Online video Personal Using online services appointment appointment face-to-face and/or apps to help appointment manage my health The public wants further action to recruit and protect healthcare professionals in preparation for a second wave As healthcare systems prepare for a potential second wave of the pandemic, respondents to our survey want to see action to recruit and protect healthcare professionals. Nearly half (48%) of respondents identified investing in personal protective equipment (PPE) to ensure the safety of doctors and nurses as one of their top priorities, followed by recruiting more doctors and nurses (38%). Figure 7: In view of a potential second wave of COVID-19 over the next 18 months, which areas of healthcare services should be prioritised now in order to prepare for such an event?* Investing in PPE to protect doctors and nurses Recruiting more doctors and nurses Stockpiling medical equipment (e.g. ventilators) Increasing intensive care capacity Recruiting and Improving social care services (e.g. care homes) protecting the medical Backlog of medical appointments and waiting lists workforce is Retaining existing doctors and nurses crucial for 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% preparing for second *Respondents were able to choose up to three priorities COVID-19 wave
Increasing intensive care capacity is less of a priority for those countries where capacity was not breached, such as Germany (24%) and the UK (24%). Focus on this issue is higher in Spain (42%), France (44%) and Italy (44%) (Figure 8). Figure 8: In view of a potential second wave of COVID-19 over the next 18 months, which areas of healthcare services should be prioritised now in order to prepare for such an event?* 61% 50% 48% 45% 44% 44% 45% 44% 42% 41% 40% 39% 38% 38% 34% 30% 30% 30% 24% 25% 25% 24% 19% 19% 18% 16% 17% 15% 14% 13% UK Spain Germany France Italy Increasing intensive care capacity Stockpiling medical equipment Addressing backlog of delayed appointments Investing in PPE for doctors and nurses Recruiting more doctors and nurses Retaining existing doctors and nurses *Respondents were able to choose up to three priorities Preparing for future pandemics As well as preparing for a second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, respondents were asked to consider the steps they would take to prepare for future potential pandemics. Figure 9 shows that investment in medical research, stockpiling PPE, investing in intensive care capacity and improving international cooperation were identified as the priorities. Over half (54%) of respondents chose investing in medical research, closely followed by investment in PPE (51%), intensive care capacity (51%) and international cooperation (51%). Support for improved international cooperation was strongest in Germany (55%) and weakest in France and the UK (both 47%). Medical research and stockpiling PPE are considered the first steps in preparing for future potential pandemics
Figure 9: What should healthcare systems do now to be better prepared for potential pandemics in the future?* Investing in more medical research Stockpiling PPE Investing in intensive care capacity Improving cooperation between different countries Investing in tools to track infections Healthcare services shouldn’t do anything to be better prepared for future pandemics 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% *Respondents were able to choose up to three priorities Methodology • The survey was conducted by Censuswide between 29 May 2020 and 03 June 2020 • The survey included 2,000 adults per country from France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK, nationally representative in terms of gender and age • Censuswide abide by and employ members of the Market Research Society which is based on the ESOMAR principles REFERENCES 1 Respondents selected ‘Strongly agree’ or ‘Agree’ when asked to what extent they agreed or disagreed with the statement “Due to the risk of catching COVID-19, I am scared to use the following health services” 2 Respondents selected ‘Strongly agree’ or ‘Agree’ when asked to what extent they agreed or disagreed with the statement “I am reluctant to use the following health services because I don’t want to take up their time and capacity during the pandemic” 3 Cancer Research UK, Over 2 million people waiting for cancer screening, tests and treatments, June 2020
You can also read