HYBRID COE - THE EUROPEAN CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR COUNTERING HYBRID THREATS - "HYBRID BY NAME, HYBRID BY NATURE"
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Hybrid CoE – The European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats “Hybrid by name, hybrid by nature”
The Changing Character of Peace? Old methods, new ways in new times. • Changing world order • Technological revolution • Change in Media landscape • Energy (all resources) as a political tool • Generation change and interpretation of history • Network based action • Modern conflict State and Non-State actors challenge balance of power, (power of the weak = when other means not available, credible or efficient enough)
Hybrid threat is a Western concept to describe 21st century security challenge • Coordinated and synchronised action, that targets democratic states’ and institutions systemic vulnerabilities, through a wide range of means. • Exploit the thresholds of detection and attribution, of war and peace, internal and external, military and civil, public and private. • The aim is to influence decision making at the local (regional), state, or institutional level to favour and/or gain the agent’s strategic goals while undermining and/or hurting the target.
Democratic states on defence - Confusion already a victory Our assets - Western values • Democracy • Democratic institutions • Human rights (Social obligations?) • Market economy • Freedom of speech • Free media • Rule of Law • Civil society • Trust to State structures and authorities
GOALS - Hybrid CoE 1. To be a safe space where nations come together to share best practice and build capability, to test new ideas and approaches, to train and and exercise 2. To be a neutral facilitator between the EU and NATO through strategic discussions and exercising 3. To lead the conversation on countering Hybrid Threats through our research and sharing of best practice 6
Basic facts - Hybrid CoE • Initiated by 16 MSs with support from EU and NATO; 9 signatories of MoU in April 2017 • First event organized on 6 September 2017, though officially inaugurated on 2 October • Latest members RO, CY, GR • SI, ME approved May 14th; TR pending Managing: • Steering Board: decides on policy, program and budget. • Secretariat: manages common functions with core staff (15) and secondments (UK2, FIN2, EE, LT, DE, AT, US, LV; PL, CDN, GR discussed)
Communities of Interest (COIs) • Network based approach • COIs are networks of practitioners (or researchers) from Member States and institutions • COIs for multidisciplinary sharing of best practice, experience and expertise for participants to better understand, defend against and respond to Hybrid threats • Space to coordinate action • Intellectual matchmaking • Multidisplinary approach
Research and Analysis Understanding the changing world, connecting the dots • Conceptualising Hybrid Origins and traditions, characterization, changes and new security environment, trend mapping • New research openings Connect unrelated areas (tech & social science), multidisciplinary, identify gaps • Networks Expert-pools (regional & thematic), cooperation with COI I • Educational training courses ”to understand hybrid” • Research to support the COIs and Training and Exercise functions Handbooks, scenarios, research papers, case-studies, assistance etc. • International joint projects Involving our partners • Publications (www.hybridcoe.fi) Strategic analysis, research reports, recommendations & lessons identified • Working with the EU and NATO Conceptualizing hybrid with JRC – putting the research together
CoE Outreach in non-EU/NATO-members • Hybrid developments in the neighborhood/partner countries clear → Collective need to know and to care • Collect information and experiences of the neighboring regions to benefit for the CoE activities • Cooperation with academia in and academia doing research on these areas. EU and NATO research bodies • Guests contributing to the knowledge base, ideas, and best practice of the CoE • Combine outreach with EU- and NATO-activities and other “same-aim” actors in the regions, ”twinning”-pilots • This is: No capacity building but cooperation when beneficial to the CoE and Memberstates • Fact finding to Georgia in March
EaP partners in particular • Their needs and commitment essential • Mapping of existing projects/financing • Practitioners’ cross-sectoral cooperation in the regions? • Partners’ experiences of hybrid warfare • Peer-support? What and where? • EaP participation in events as speakers • Cooperation with academia?
Conclusions • Western values • All have vulnerabilities • Rational and intellectually honest analysis • Corner stones of democracy challenged • Comprehensive All-govt – inter-institutional approach vital • Obvious demand for joint actions • Hybrid CoE as a catalyst
Twitter @HybridCoE www.hybridcoe.fi
You can also read