How safe is food labelled 'gluten free' for the management of coeliac disease in New Zealand? - Dr Kirsten Coppell, Public Health Physician
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
How safe is food labelled ‘gluten free’ for the management of coeliac disease in New Zealand? Dr Kirsten Coppell, Public Health Physician Senior Research Fellow, Department of Medicine, University of Otago; Training Programme Supervisor, NZCPHM
Disclosures 1. No food industry conflicts of interest 2. My husband and both our children have coeliac disease 3. Self-confessed foodie
Methods Permission was sought to use the Canadian Celiac Health Survey1 Study population was members of Coeliac New Zealand Incorporated (n=2720) Data from 936 (199 men; 737 women) biopsy positive adults aged ≥ 16 years Average age respondents = 54.1 years Majority (94%) New Zealand Europeans Average time between onset of symptoms and diagnosis = 11.6 years 1Cranney A, Zarkadas M, Graham I, Switzer C. The Canadian celiac health survey - the Ottawa chapter pilot. BMC Gastroenterology. 2003;3(1):8.
Clinical symptoms prior to diagnosis & recovery rates Symptom Present at Fully Recovered diagnosis (%) (%) Bloating, gas, abdominal pain 76 52 Extreme weakness or tiredness 67 52 Diarrhoea 64 57 Anaemia 57 68 Weight loss 49 76 Large, pale, foul-smelling stools 42 67
Clinical symptoms prior to diagnosis & recovery rates Symptom Present at diagnosis Fully Recovered (%) (%) Mood swings/depression 40 41 Itchy skin 36 31 Constipation 33 43 Bone/joint pain 33 29 Mouth ulcers 32 60 Other symptoms included easy bruising of skin, nausea or vomiting, migraines, muscle cramps, eczema, lactose intolerance, swollen hands/feet/ankles, poor growth, hypoglycemia
Accidental Consumption of Gluten • 80% reported always having a reaction after eating gluten, and 14% were unsure • most common symptoms were gastrointestinal • frequency of accidental consumption of gluten 82% - rarely or occasionally 13% - monthly 5% - at least weekly
Impact of GF diet on quality of life All of Most of Some of Never the time the time the time (%) (%) (%) (%) I (we) avoided restaurants because 5 21 53 22 of coeliac disease. I (we) avoided travelling because of 2 8 27 64 coeliac disease. I (we) brought gluten-free food 43 28 24 6 when I (we) travelled. I was (we were) not invited out for 1 6 35 58 meals because of coeliac disease.
Figure 2. Histogram plots of the distribution of gluten consumption in the different population groups a measured by GIP in stool. >300mg/day >600mg/day Adult - nonCD 100% 100% CD, 0-3 yrs 9% 3% CD, 4-12 yrs 15% 6% CD, ≥13 yrs 18% 4%
Gluten free food standards in New Zealand Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) develops standards for the food industry in Australia and New Zealand. the Food Standards Code requires mandatory labelling of food products where gluten is present as an ingredient, a food additive or a processing aid or a component of any of these. the standard states ‘a claim that a food is gluten free must not be made in relation to a food unless the food contains no detectable gluten; and no oats or their products; or cereals containing gluten that have been malted, or their products.’
Gluten free food standards in NZ • FSANZ do not enforce the Code, and no regular monitoring of adherence to the FSANZ standards. • reliance on the public making complaints to appropriate authorities (public health units or local governments), who have the responsibility to enforce the code. • In contrast to, for example the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). The CFIA compliance and enforcement actions occur all along the supply chain and they involve numerous stakeholders and jurisdictions.
The Safe Food for Canadians Act makes food as safe as possible for Canadian families; protects consumers by targeting unsafe practices; implement tougher penalties for activities that put health and safety at risk; provides better control over imports; institutes a more consistent inspection regime across all food commodities; and strengthens food traceability
Oamaru baker warned over gluten-free mix-up Wednesday, 21 December 2011 Otago Daily Times An Oamaru baker has been warned by the Commerce Commission after selling a gluten-free loaf that contained gluten. However, Harbour Street Bakery's Ed Balsink said yesterday gluten found in the loaf was an accident, when the wrong flour was used, and he had stopped producing the loaf because there is "no 100% guarantee" it can be gluten-free. It no longer makes the loaf nor gluten-free products, because of that, he said. The bakery used to make about 20 gluten-free loaves a week, but stopped the product about seven months ago, as soon as the Commerce Commission found they contained gluten. Earlier this year, the Commerce Commission visited the Harbour Street Bakery and bought three loaves of bread from three batches described as "gluten-free" on signs and the bakery's website. Testing can detect any gluten more than 3ppm (parts per million), which would have breached the gluten-free claim under the provisions of the Fair Trading Act. Initial testing found gluten of more than 50ppm and further testing in the region of 1000ppm. The manager of the Christchurch competition-fair trading branch, Stuart Wallace said gluten was harmful to people with coeliac disease, as the only effective treatment was complete gluten avoidance. Mr Balsink told the commission he was uncertain how the gluten got into the loaves, suggesting there may have been a residue from equipment and bread slicer. He also suggested a baker may have added gluten by mistake. Mr Balsink, when contacted by the Otago Daily Times, said about 99% of the bakery's products were made from wheat flour, which made it hard to maintain a gluten-free environment. If prosecuted, the bakery could have been fined up to $200,000 and individuals up to $60,000. However, the commission had decided to issue a warning letter, advise media and take no further action. david.bruce@odt.co.nz
Rice wheat crop rotation
Wheat & Rice Reaper This product is used for reaping wheat and rice that is between 0.5- 0.8 meters high.
Cropping systems - India
61 of 640 (9.5%) samples of naturally GF ingredients had gluten levels >20mg/kg (range 5 - 7995 mg/kg) with soy, millet and buckwheat most commonly contaminated 3 of 268 samples labelled GF had gluten levels >20mg/kg (range 5 - 141 mg/kg)
• Gluten contamination was detected in 33 of 173 (19%) samples, with a range of 2.5 - >80 mg kg−1. • In 10 of the 173 samples (6%), the quantity of gluten exceeded the upper limit of 20 mg kg−1. • Of the 40 brand names tested twice in 2014 and 2015, 15 (38%) showed significantly (p < .05) different gluten content between the 2 years.
https://www.foodsmatter.com/coeliac-disease/management/pulse-contamination-cane-06-17.html
You can also read