Gaia's view of star clusters - @Jos_de_Bruijne European Space Agency 15 November 2017 @ESAGaia #GaiaMission - cosmos.esa.int
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Gaia’s view of star clusters @Jos_de_Bruijne European Space Agency 15 November 2017 @ESAGaia #GaiaMission Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC
Promises q No equations q Light on acronyms q Watch a video q Quiz q Reveal secret q Lots of data (April 2018) Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC
Contents q Gaia q Gaia DR1 q Globular clusters q Open clusters(+ dwarf galaxies) q The Hyades q Gaia DR2 q Conclusions Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC
Contents q Gaia q Gaia DR1 q Globular clusters q Open clusters(+ dwarf galaxies) q The Hyades q Gaia DR2 q Conclusions Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC
A Milky Way look-alike Sebastien: “We study comets because they have preserved the original building blocks of the Solar system” Gaia’s main aim: unravel the structure, formation, composition, and evolution of our Galaxy Key: stars, through their motions and chemical composition, contain a fossil record of the Galaxy’s past evolution 7 Figure courtesy European Southern Observatory (NGC1232)
The need for Gaia q Archaeological studies of the Galaxy require: q Distances and motions, combined with physical properties of stars (temperature, gravity, extinction, chemical composition, mass, age, ….) q For a representative, complete sample of stars (1+ billion objects ≈ 0.5% of the stars in the Milky Way) q This can only be achieved from space, by collecting: q Astrometry (3D positions and 2D velocities; Astrometric Field = AF) q Photometry (spectro-photometry; Blue and Red Photometers = BP and RP) q Spectroscopy (150 million brightest stars; Radial Velocity Spectrograph = RVS) q This precisely is Gaia! 8
One billion stars in 3D will provide … • ... in our Galaxy … – the spatial and velocity distributions of all stellar populations – the formation history and past evolution of bulge, disk, and halo – a rigorous framework for stellar structure and evolution theories – a large-scale survey of double and multiple stars (~100,000,000) – a large-scale survey of extra-solar planets (~7,000) – a large-scale survey of solar-system bodies (~350,000) • … and beyond ... – supernovae and burst sources (~6,000) – local-group galaxies, including the Magellanic Clouds (~20) – resolved galaxies (~1,000,000) plus quasars and redshifts (~500,000) – relativistic light bending, microlensing, gravitational waves (upper limits), ... Posters Timo and11Uwe
Gaia in one viewgraph X q Who: European, ESA-only mission q When: launch 19 December 2013 for a nominal 5-year mission (+ extension) q Where: L2 (1.5 million km from Earth) q What: positions, parallaxes, proper motions for 1+ billion stars (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022) X q Data processing: 430 scientists (DPAC) q Software: 3 million lines of code (Java) q Data collected so far: 47 terabyte with 90 billion star transits (and counting ...) q First data X release: 14 September 2016 with 2 Figure courtesy Jane Douglas (ESA) Figure courtesy ESA million positions, parallaxes, proper motions
Routine operations q In five-year routine phase since 25 July 2014 q Data collected so far (cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/mission-numbers): q 891 billion astrometric measurements (AF) q 180 billion low-resolution photometric measurements (BP/RP) q 17 billion high-resolution spectra (RVS) q Magnitude limits: q Astrometry and photometry down to G = 20.7 mag q Spectra down to GRVS = 16.2 mag Posters Natalia and q Special data: Johannes q Sky-Mapper imaging for stars brighter than G = 3 mag q Sky-Mapper imaging of Baade’s Window, ω Cen, etc. q Special data not (yet) processed in the standard pipelines
Contents q Gaia q Gaia DR1 q Globular clusters q Open clusters(+ dwarf galaxies) q The Hyades q Gaia DR2 q Conclusions Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC
Data Release 1 (DR1) – 14 September 2016 q Based (only) on 14 months of input data q Astrometry q Position for ~1.1 billion sources (epoch J2015.0) q Parallax and proper motion for ~2 million Hipparcos and Tycho-2 stars (V < 11 mag; Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution – TGAS) q Covariance matrix (standard errors and correlations) q Reference frame aligned to ICRS using ~2000 QSOs q Photometry q Mean G-band flux and error for all sources q Photometric zero-point (VEGAMAG and AB) q Transformations to other photometric systems (e.g., Sloan, Johnson-Cousins) q Light curve and classification for ~3000 selected RR-Lyraes and Cepheids q Data, documentation, and visualisation q archives.esac.esa.int/gaia (plus ESASky!)
Data Release 1 (DR1) – 14 September 2016 x 2 million d x 1 billion x 3000 Brightness Figure (idea) courtesy Anthony Brown Time
Contents q Gaia q Gaia DR1 q Globular clusters q Open clusters(+ dwarf galaxies) q The Hyades q Gaia DR2 q Conclusions Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC
Gaia’s first sky map Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC
M4 in ESASky with DR1 positions
Globular clusters and Gaia Watkins & Van der Marel (2017) Total number ... globular of stars in ... clusters Milky Way GC catalogue (Harris 1996 + updates) Many 157 Search DR1-TGAS within 2 tidal radii 4268 142 Check magnitude (tip RGB and fainter) 967 30 Retain if proper motion and parallax agree with HST 64 15 Add radial velocity from literature 59 15 Retain if on evolutionary CMD sequence 48 11 Check with field-star model 20 5 Wait for (at least) DR2 ... Pancino et al. (2017): “The astrometry will be only marginally affected by crowding, even for the most field-contaminated bulge GCs” Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC
Really wait for DR2? q Massari et al. (2017) combined HST and Gaia DR1 positions in NGC2419 (d ~ 87.5 kpc) q Relative proper motions over 12.27 year for 366 members q Made absolute using a (I mean one ) background galaxy q Derive orbit in Milky Way halo (pericentre ~ 53 kpc, apocentre ~ 98 kpc) q Possibly associated to Sgr dwarf spheroidal
Contents q Gaia q Gaia DR1 q Globular clusters q Open clusters(+ dwarf galaxies) q The Hyades q Gaia DR2 q Conclusions Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC
Open clusters Talks Antonella, Anthony, and Danny q How / when / where / why do clusters form? q Internal structure, mass segregation, flattening, mass & luminosity function, ... q How / when / where / why do clusters evaporate and populate the field? q How do galactic disks evolve? q Trace stars / streams back to original cluster / association (+ runaway stars) q Milky Way disk tracers (migration, resonances, heating, chemical evolution) q Test stellar structure and evolution models across the mass spectrum q Variability (Cepheids, RR Lyraes, ...) and multiplicity (incl. planets) q ... Figure courtesy Roth Ritter
Open clusters before Gaia q Karchenko et al. (2013) q Some 3006 clusters* known q Knowledge heavily biased q Most are nearby q Only complete to ~1.5 kpc(?) q Size of nucleus depends on distance (detection bias) q Some 100,000 could exist ... *Actually includes asterisms, remnants, associations, ... Figure courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt
Open clusters and Gaia q End-of-mission astrometric accuracy rule of thumb at 15th magnitude q 1% accuracy at 1 kpc q 5% accuracy at 5 kpc Type Number known < 1 kpc < 5 kpc Globular clusters 157 0 15 Open clusters 3006 370 ~2630 q Detection of clusters (all sky, faint, complete, accurate, precise, unbiased) q Determination of members (astrometry + photometry + spectroscopy) q Characterisation of clusters (distances, motions, orbits, ages, metallicities) q Characterisation of cluster members (binaries, variables, abundances) Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC
Gaia Collaboration et al. (2017) q Validation of TGAS using 19 clusters within ~500 pc q Some ~15-150 members q Find members out to ~15 pc (which is selected field size) q Distances in line with literature, with one exception (see later) q Narrow main sequences, for instance Hyades (see later) q TGAS = tip of the iceberg ...
Gaia Collaboration et al. (2017) q Validation of TGAS using 19 NGC 2516: Jeffries et al. (2001) clusters within ~500 pc q Some ~15-150 members q Find members out to ~15 pc (which is selected field size) q Distances in line with literature, with one exception (see later) q Narrow main sequences, for instance Hyades (see later) q TGAS = tip of the iceberg ...
Gaia reveals cluster existence q Koposov et al. (2017) systematically searched the DR1 position catalogue for position overdensities q Known dwarf galaxies show up q Note: Antoja et al. (2015) predict new ultra-faint dwarf galaxy detections! q “These examples demonstrate the incredible purity and quality of the Gaia Catalogue, and highlight Gaia’s superb satellite discovery capabilities even without colour information”
Gaia reveals cluster existence q Koposov et al. (2017) discovered a new cluster ~11’ from Sirius (“Gaia 1”) q A 10σ detection, actually also seen in WISE star counts
Gaia reveals cluster existence q Koposov et al. (2017) discovered a new cluster ~11’ from Sirius (“Gaia 1”) q A 10σ detection, actually also seen in WISE star counts q Spectroscopic confirmation by Simpson et al. (2017)
Gaia reveals cluster existence q Koposov et al. (2017) discovered a new cluster ~11’ from Sirius (“Gaia 1”) q A 10σ detection, actually also seen in WISE star counts q Spectroscopic confirmation by Simpson et al. (2017) q Old (3 Gyr), thick-disk cluster (zmax ~ 1.1 kpc) at ~4.5 kpc q Did it survive ~30 galactic- plane passages?! q Links to extra-galactic origin discussion ...
Open clusters beyond the Milky Way q JdB & De Marchi (2011) simulated Gaia’s view of R136 in the LMC q Even a density of ~1.5 million stars deg-2 is “no problem” for on-board detection q Obviously, crowding causes window truncation and blending q Crowded regions therefore sub- optimally covered in DR2 Figure courtesy NASA/ESA
Contents q Gaia q Gaia DR1 q Globular clusters q Open clusters(+ dwarf galaxies) q The Hyades q Gaia DR2 q Conclusions Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC
The Hyades q Nearby (~45 pc), intermediate age (~700 Myr), not reddened, huge area on sky (60° × 60°), large (peculiar) proper motion (110 mas yr-1), large (peculiar) radial velocity (40 km s-1) q Reino et al. (in prep.) use TGAS data (+ Hipparcos stars as needed to complement bright end) q Start with 2296 stars in field q Add 908 literature radial velocities (vr) q Determine membership only based on kinematics q Find 251 candidate members (200 with vr) q Past members demoted: 15 q New members with vr: 18 Figure courtesy Airbus DS
TGAS entries in 10-pc-radius sphere @ 45 pc
TGAS entries in 10-pc-radius sphere @ 45 pc
Principal axes of the moment-of-inertia matrix q TGAS data confirm Major axis Hipparcos findings Intermediate axis q Cluster roughly Minor axis spherical in core (rc ~ 3 pc) but flattened at larger radii (rt ~ 10 pc) q Cluster flattened along galactic plane q Naturally expected from tidal evolution over ~700 Myr
Stars colour coded with distance to centre q Clear, dense core with significant spread of members Distance to cluster centre [pc] out to large radii
Stars colour coded with member likelihood lower-probability member q Clear, dense core with significant spread of members out to large radii q Some corona / halo stars are high-fidelity members Highest-probability member
Projections of the three principal axes added lower-probability member q Clear, dense core with significant spread of members out to large radii q Some corona / halo stars are high-fidelity members Highest-probability member q Cluster is resolved: spread reflects internal structure + projection q “Soft edge” / gradual transition into field
Colour vs absolute-magnitude diagram lower-probability member q Smooth main sequence over ~10 magnitudes Main and binary q Messy turn-off (rotation, sequence from binarity, Am stars, Smith (2012) magnetic mixing, ...) q Four (known) giants q Binary sequence visible Highest-probability member q Photometric errors in B-V dominate over absolute-magnitude errors(!)
Colour vs absolute-magnitude diagram lower-probability member q Kinematic modelling: assume stars share 3D Padova isochrone (675 Myr) cluster space motion but allow for dispersion σv q Use maximum likelihood method to fit 3D space motion, σv, and individual Highest-probability member parallaxes, given the proper motions + errors q Iterate: reject outliers (binaries, escapers, ...) q Improved parallaxes for 187 stars and σv ~ 0.25 km s-1
Colour vs absolute-magnitude diagram q Substructure in main sequence around B-V ~ 0.4 q Effects of convection in atmospheres and envelope (Böhm-Vitense gap) q D’Antona et al. (2002) show that isochrones are sensitive to convection treatment: mixing-length theory (MLT) versus full-spectrum turbulence (FST) q Work in progress ...
Colour vs absolute-magnitude diagram q Substructure in main sequence around B-V ~ 0.4 q Effects of convection in atmospheres and envelope (Böhm-Vitense gap) q D’Antona et al. (2002) show that isochrones are sensitive to convection treatment: mixing-length theory (MLT) versus full-spectrum FST turbulence (FST) MLT q Work in progress ...
Moving the Hyades 0.450 Myr into the future Movie courtesy JdB
The Pleiades cluster Images courtesy Anthony Ayiomamitis and Gaia Collaboration
The Pleiades cluster Images courtesy Anthony Ayiomamitis and Gaia Collaboration
The Pleiades cluster Images courtesy Anthony Ayiomamitis and Gaia Collaboration
Contents q Gaia q Gaia DR1 q Globular clusters q Open clusters(+ dwarf galaxies) q The Hyades q Gaia DR2 q Conclusions Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC
Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) – April 2018 q Based on 21 months of data q Position, parallax, and proper motion for ~1 billion sources (epoch J2015.5) with full covariance matrix (standard errors & correlations) “Gaia DR2 will not be perfect but it will be q Typical parallax standard errors: 30 µas (
Contents q Gaia q Gaia DR1 q Globular clusters q Open clusters(+ dwarf galaxies) q The Hyades q Gaia DR2 q Conclusions Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC Figure courtesy ESA/Gaia/DPAC
Conclusion q Gaia = U3 q Unique mission aimed at q Unfolding the structure and evolution of the Milky Way through q Ultra-precise, multi-epoch observations of 1+ billion stars q Two+ million stars “teaser release” September 2016 q One+ billion stars “bomb release” April 2018 q Since I started talking, Gaia collected q 7,577,189 astrometric observations q 996,170 photometric observations q 155,411 spectroscopic observations Figure courtesy Airbus DS
You can also read