Food Hygiene Service Plan 2020 2021 - Rochford District Council
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Food Hygiene Service Plan 2020 - 2021 Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
Introduction The current pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented situation where the Food Standards Agency (FSA) has suspended part of the 2019 – 2020 programme and the 2020 – 2021 is currently suspended until further notice. As such the current guidance from the FSA is that Local Authorities are not to visit food premises unless it is urgent such as to investigate a food poisoning outbreak. New legislation, The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) (Amendment) (No2) Regulations 2020, places restrictions on food premises and has required some to temporarily close. These factors have meant that when writing the service plan a number of assumptions have had to be made when writing this service plan and the number of due inspections has been calculated as normal. The pandemic has introduced an element of uncertainty into the departments planning for the year and any alterations made by the FSA to the 2020 - 2021 work programme will result in amendments to our service plan. Social distancing requirements has meant staff have been re-deployed to work from home dealing with issues such complaints, queries and advice. Investigations into infectious diseases. The pandemic has meant that the department has taken on additional responsibilities in order to help protect the public such as enforcing the new Regulations relating to what premises can trade. It is anticipated that the department will be asked to assist Public Health England contact tracing and this could result in a significant amount of work, details are awaited at time of writing. 1 Demands on the Food Service 1.1 Make up Of Rochford District As of 1 April 2020, we have identified that the service is responsible for enforcing Food Safety legislation in 563 food premises within Rochford District, a reduction of 98 premises from the previous year. This is entirely due to a reduction in the number of premises trading. The risk assessment programme for food safety is set out in the Food Law Code of Practice (England) 2017, Inspection Rating Scheme. The Code of Practice requires that all food premises be subject to a degree of surveillance although the code does allow alternative enforcement methods to be used with the lowest risk premises. Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
The 563 food premises have been categorised as follows: Number of Number of Risk category premises 2020- premises Intervention frequency 2021 2019-2020 A 1 0 At least every 6 months B 19 21 At least every 12 months C 58 71 At least every 18 months At least every 2 years 187 alternating between D 166 official controls and other interventions At least every 3 years by E 291 313 alternative enforcement strategy The total number of total rated food premises in 2020 to 2020 is calculated as 556. The total number of rated premises in 2019 to 2020 was 571. The number of unrated newly registered premises in 2020 to 2021 is currently 7, and in 2019 to 2020 was 90. All new premises must be inspected within 28 fays of registration. Therefore, the total number of food premises known in 2020 is currently 563, and in 2019 it was 661. 1.1.1 The percentage of food premises in the Rochford District that score 3 or above (satisfactory) on the national Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS) is currently 85%. This is identical to the average score for nearby authorities within the Essex area. 1.1.2 Arrangements are in place via the out of hours service for contacting senior officers regarding matters arising outside of normal working hours e.g. food poisoning outbreaks, food safety incidents and food alerts. 1.2 Enforcement Policy 1.2.1 The service has adopted the Government’s “Regulators Code” which contains statutory guidance and means that the Council is committed to open and fair enforcement of the law pertaining to food safety. These principles are also embedded within the services enforcement policy which can be found on the Councils website or a paper copy can be obtained from the Council Offices. Enforcement decisions will be documented and monitored to demonstrate adherence with the policy. Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
2 Service Delivery 2.1 Food Premises Interventions 2.1.1 The food service carries out programmed interventions of food premises to assess the hygiene of those premises and the public health protection aspects of the law. A programmed intervention is either an inspection by an officer or in some cases a self assessment questionnaire. The service has a documented procedure for food hygiene interventions which is reviewed annually and revised as and when legislation/guidance changes. 2.1.2 Following every primary food hygiene intervention, the officer assesses the risk posed by the business with reference to the nature of its operation, the level of compliance with food safety requirements and confidence in its management. A risk rating score is generated on these criteria and is used to determine the frequency of inspection based on the Food Law Code of Practice. Intervention programme due 2020-2021 Category Interventions due Overdue from 2019 2020-2021 - 2020 A 0 0 B 17 0 C 28 0 D 80 11 E 84 32 Unrated premises (new) 5 2 Total 214 45 Total intervention programme 259 2.1.3 Revisits will be undertaken where significant breaches of hygiene regulations are identified during inspection. Based on the percentage of inspections previously generating revisits, it is estimated that the department will have to carry out between 30 to 40 revisits in 2020-2021. 2.1.4 Any new food premises that register with the authority will receive an inspection where the officer will provide guidance on how to run their food businesses so that they produce safe food for their customers. When applicable officers will refer new food business to the authorities Economic Development Team for further support from the authority. 2.1.5 Any food business that meets the criteria for requiring approval, produces large amounts of potentially high-risk food that is being distributed to a large market, will not be allowed to trade until they have been granted approval. Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
2.1.6 The Food Law Code of Practice requires 100% of premises due for inspection to be inspected within 28 days of their due date. Priority is given to high risk (Category A, B and C) inspections. Category D and E premises may be risk rated by alternative inspection strategies such as the use of a questionnaire. 2.1.7 Food safety functions such as inspections/interventions, investigating food complaints, dealing with food poisoning outbreaks, enquiries, requests for advice, food sampling and investigation of poor sampling results are undertaken by the Environmental Health Team Leader and two Environmental Health Officers (EHO). All officers have access to the following technical support: • Internet Access. • Primary Authority Database. • The Food Hygiene Forum Community of Practice. • FSA website, publications and seminars. • The Knowledge Hub. • Legal library resources. 2.2 Complaints about Food and Food Businesses. 2.2.1 Policy and Procedures for responding to and dealing with complaints, enquiries and other requests for service are documented with in the standard operating procedures. These are reviewed annually and revised as and when legislation/guidance changes or improvements to client experience are identified. 2.2.2 All complaints that are investigated are done so in accordance with the services enforcement policy and procedures. Emphasis is placed on those complaints that have the potential to cause most harm to public health. 2.2.3 If further investigation is required, the food complaint is sent to the Public Analyst (Kent and Hampshire Scientific Services) for formal analysis or to the food examiner (Public Health England, Colindale) for microbiological examination. 2.2.4 Based on trends over the last four years it is estimated that the following number of service requests complaints and requests for service will be received during 2020- 2021. Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
Number of service requests received over the past four years Year Number of service requests 2016-2017 192 2017-2018 166 2018-2019 137 2019-2020 181 2020-2021 169 Estimated 2.3 Home Authority / Primary Authority 2.3.1 The Primary Authority Scheme’ allows a business, or the Local Better Regulation Office, to nominate a Local Authority to become a central point of contact on regulatory matters linked to a specific business. It is not a requirement for the company to be in the nominated authorities district. 2.3.2 There are currently no formal or informal Primary Authority Partnerships set up for any food business within Rochford District. 2.3.3 Extra resources would be required for meeting and advising businesses should we become a primary authority for a business. 2.4 Advice to business 2.4.1 The provision of advice is given to existing or proposed food businesses on request to help them comply with the law and to encourage best practice. This also reflects and contributes towards the ‘Hampton Principle’ of providing authoritative, accessible advice easily and cheaply. This is achieved through a range of activities including: • Advice given during inspections and other visits to premises. • Provision of advisory leaflets. • Responding to service requests and enquiries. • Through participation in the “Safer Food Better Business” scheme. • Through information placed on the Council’s website. 2.4.2 Officers give advice in accordance with recognised guidance and Codes of Practice and ensure that on-site visits are made, where necessary, prior to opening of new businesses that we are aware of. 2.4.3 Procedures for responding to and dealing with complaints, enquiries and other service requests are documented in the standard operating procedures. These will be reviewed annually and revised as and when legislation/guidance changes. 2.4.4 Extra resources would be required if the service were to have significant input into business partnerships or forums. Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
2.5 Food Sampling 2.5.1 A procedure for the microbiological sampling of foodstuffs is documented and is reviewed annually and revised as and when legislation/guidance changes. 2.5.2 Food sampling carried out by the service is mostly undertaken for monitoring and surveillance purposes on an informal basis. Occasionally formal food sampling is required as part of a food poisoning investigation or prosecution. 2.5.3 The Public Health England (PHE) laboratory has produced a regional co-ordinated food sampling programme for 2020-2021. This includes four co-ordinated sampling initiatives organised by Local Government Regulation. Additional sampling will be organised in-house based on local intelligence and previous results. 2.5.4 Other food sampling can be undertaken as part of food poisoning and complaint investigations or as part of food premises inspections to monitor hygiene standards and confirm adequacy of food processing systems. 2.5.5 The Public Health England (PHE) laboratory allocates the Council credits for funding examinations of food carried out at Public Health England (Colindale). Rochford District Council has been allocated 4000 credits for the year 2020-2021. This is the same amount of credits issued as last year and based on current demand is sufficient for our purposes. 2.5.6 The service has appointed Kent Scientific Services and Hampshire Scientific Services as the Council’s official Public Analysts, in accordance with section 27 of the Food Safety Act 1990. The Public Analyst will be used by the service when food contaminants cannot be readily identified and require closer examination to discover their true nature. 2.6 Control and Investigation of Outbreaks and Food Related Infectious Disease. 2.6.1 The service assesses all notifications it receives of cases of food poisoning and suspected food poisoning occurring within the District and takes appropriate control measures where necessary. When an outbreak is suspected the investigations are carried out either jointly or in close contact with the Consultant in Communicable Disease Control from PHE. Outbreak Control investigations will be conducted in accordance with the Control of Communicable Disease Joint Plan of Essex Local Health Protection Teams and Essex Local Authorities. 2.6.2 Procedures for the investigation of food poisoning notifications are documented in the standard operating procedures and are reviewed annually and revised as and when legislation/guidance changes. 2.6.3 Based on trends over the last four years it is estimated that the following number of food related infectious diseases will be received during 2020-2021. Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
Number of food related infectious diseases for the past four years Number of formal notifications of food Year related infectious disease 2016-2017 79 2017-2018 111 2018-2019 121 2019-2020 177 2020-2021 122 Estimated 2.7 Food Alerts and Food Safety Incidents. 2.7.1 A food alert is a communication from the Food Standards Agency (FSA) to the local food authority concerning a food hazard or other food incident. The food alert may or may not require the food authority to act. 2.7.2 Procedures for responding to and initiating food hazard warnings are documented in the authorities standard operating procedures. These are reviewed annually and revised as and when legislation / guidance changes. 2.7.3 The service receives food alerts via a dedicated FSA – enforcement mailbox. This service delivery area is carried out in accordance with the requirements stipulated in the Food Law Code of Practice (England) Chapter 2:2. Based on trends over the last four years it is estimated that the following number of food alerts will be received during 2020-2021. Number of food alerts Year Number of food alerts 2016-2017 66 2017-2018 49 2018-2019 98 2019-2020 189 2020-2021 100 Estimated 2.8 Liaison with other organisations 2.8.1 Rochford District Council has been represented at regular meetings of the Essex Food Liaison Group by its Environmental Health Team Leader. From this year the due to staff changes the representative will be an EHO. In order to encourage consistency of enforcement within the 14 Essex Authorities the group formulates strategies and procedures. It liaises with other professional bodies such as food trade and trade Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
organisations over specific matters arising and takes advice from groups including the FSA, Meat and Livestock Commission. The group also undertakes peer review exercises and arranges relevant officer training. 2.8.2 This group includes representatives from authorities such as: Trading Standards, The FSA and a microbiologist from the Essex Health Protection Agency Food Laboratory. 2.8.3 One of the EHO’s regularly attends the Health Protection Liaison meeting. These meetings were set up to develop guidelines on infection control measures, act as advisory groups, making recommendations on all aspects of communicable disease (including food poisoning) conduct peer reviews and to formulate outbreak control plans. 2.8.4 This group includes representatives from food authorities, the Health Authority, the Primary Care Trust and Essex and Suffolk Water. 2.8.5 The service liaises with other departments within Rochford District Council including Economic Development, Community Safety, Building Control, Planning and Licensing. 2.8.6 The service is regularly consulted on planning and building regulation applications regarding new and existing food premises and in respect of licensing applications for which we act as a responsible authority. These are used to identify new food business and changes to existing operations. 2.9 Food Safety Promotion 2.9.1 We will continue as an authority take part in the National Food Safety Week and the Essex Tuck In project that both promotes healthy / healthier eating within the district. Both these projects encourage food business on the district to provide health options to their customers by reducing the amount of salt and fat in food. The service will work with business encouraging as many as possible to partake and help those that do to maximise their involvement. 2.9.2 Substantial information regarding food and infectious disease has been placed on the Environmental Health section of the Council’s website. 2.10 Safer Food Better Business Coaching Sessions 2.10.1 The service provides one to one coaching sessions on “Safer Food Better Business” with caterers and retail premises within the district that request our help. We will contact businesses that are known or suspected to have had difficulties with the implementation of a food safety management system and identify such premises during routine inspections. 2.11 Food Hygiene Rating System / Charging for re-rating Visits 2.11.1 The National FHRS has been operating in Rochford District since February 2011. We will continue to promote this scheme to both members of the public and businesses with the message that maintaining a high standard of food hygiene is good for business. 2.11.2 Part of the scheme involves carrying out re-ratings of premises that want to improve their rating such re-rating requests, these visits are carried out between the planned Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
statutory hygiene inspections at the request of the food business operators. Whilst limited within Rochford these visits do place an additional burden on staff resources. 2.11.3 The current FSA guidance allows authorities to make a charge for requests received for an FHRS re-rating inspection on a cost recovery basis only using powers available under the Localism Act 2011. 2.11.4 When calculating the charge for carrying out a re-rating consideration was given to the guidance issued by HM Treasury on “Managing Public Money” and based upon the average hourly rate for an officer to undertake an inspection, including the completion of the associated administration arising from the visit. The current fee for a re-rating ahead of its routine schedule is £123.80. 2.11.5 No food business chose to pay for a re-rating during 2019 – 2020. 3 Resources 3.1 Staffing Allocation 3.1.1 One of the EHOs was on extended sick leave throughout most of 2019, it was therefore decided that a contractor would be engaged to cover them until they were able to return to work. Without this appointment the department would not have been able to meet all of its statutory obligations and this would mean the public would be placed at an increased risk from food borne illness and the Authority from criticism from the Food Standards Agency who regulate this function. The EHO returned to work in November 2019. 3.1.2 The resources available to undertake food law enforcement during 2020-2021 will be 1.85 full time equivalent officers as detailed below: Officer Full time equivalent (FTE) Team Leader 0.15 Environmental Health Officer 0.9 Environmental Health Officer 0.8 Total 1.85 3.1.3 Two members of the team fall into a health protection category meaning that on current Government advice they should not come into close contact with the public. For as long as this guidance remains in effect safe working methods such as use of appropriate personal protective equipment would be required to carry out normal work activities. Failure to establish a safe working system would significantly impact on the resources available to carry out food hygiene inspections. Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
3.2 Staff Development Plan 3.2.1 Officers authorised to undertake inspections and other enforcement duties must be suitably qualified, experienced and competent as set out in Chapter 4 of the Food Law Code of Practice (England) 2017. 3.2.2 As part of the personal performance and development appraisal scheme all authorised food safety officers undergo annual performance reviews which include review of their training requirements and personal development objectives. Regular team meetings are organised to discuss matters and issues of consistency. 3.2.3 The staff covering this service will continue to be encouraged, motivated and trained to develop their potential and use their talents for the benefit of the people of the district. 3.2.4 The Food Law Code of Practice (England) 2017 requires all food officers to undergo at least 20 hours of continuing Professional Development each year in order to remain competent. The Environmental Health Team Leader is responsible for checking that all food competent staff fulfil this requirement. 3.2.5 Officers whose knowledge in relation to food matters has lapsed or has become out of date must undergo structured revision training before resuming food law enforcement duties. Records of ongoing training are kept by the Environmental Health Team Leader. 3.2.6 To fulfil training needs, officers attend seminars and courses arranged by the Essex Food Liaison Group, Central Government advisory bodies, other local authorities and external training organisations. 3.3 Quality Assessment 3.3.1 The quality of service provided by the unit is assessed by: • Monitoring performance against service and officer targets. • Monthly reporting on work conducted and progress towards established targets to the Assistant Director and Team Leader. • Monitoring actual working practices against procedures and protocols for: − Inspection of food businesses − Investigation of complaints and food poisoning notifications − Carrying out sampling − Enforcement − Undertaking customer satisfaction surveys of local businesses receiving inspection 3.3.2 Performance monitoring will be undertaken by generating monthly reports from the Uniform database on: Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
• Inspections, for comparison against the annual programme and • Complaints and other service requests to monitor progress. 3.3.3 The Environmental Health Team Leader will carry out audits and monitor working practices internally. Should the need arise for additional monitoring of the food function we would approach the Essex Food Liaison Group. 3.3.4 In order to ensure consistency, the team will take part in the annual consistency exercises run by the FSA and the Essex Food Group. In addition, all officers including the Environmental Health Team Leader will take turns shadowing the other team members to monitor working practices. 3.3.5 At the end of the service plan period the Authority will compare the years performance targets and performance standards included in this service plan. Any variation and the reasons for the variation will be included in the review and any service development or improvement will be identified, as necessary. 4 Review of 2019-2020 4.1 An annual review of the previous year’s service plan is completed at the start of each financial year. 4.2 One of the EHOs was on extended sick leave up until November 2019 resulting in the need to employ a contractor to maintain department capacity. However, it was necessary to prioritise the workload to the detriment of other areas of work such as sampling and inspecting new premises. 4.3 Total number of interventions completed Non programmed food hygiene inspections are new premises that open on the district, revisits and high-risk premises that become due twice in that year. Inspections Actual Percentage due for carried out completed 4.3.1 2019-2020 Programmed food hygiene interventions due at start of 363 320 88% programme Non programmed food hygiene 50 48 96% inspections – revisits Breakdown of programmed Interventions Category Interventions due Actual carried Percentage 2019-2020 out completed A (high risk) 0 0 n/a B (high risk) 18 18 100% Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
Category Interventions due Actual carried Percentage 2019-2020 out completed C (moderate risk) 47 47 100% D (low risk) 65 51 78% E (low risk) 143 114 80% Unrated premises (new) 90 90 100% 4.4 Reactive work 2019-2020 This is the reactive work that varies from year to year. Actual carried out Estimated for 2020-2021 Reactive food hygiene 31 - interventions Food hazard warnings 189 100 Food related infectious 177 122 diseases Hygiene rating appeals 0 - Number of service requests 189 169 4.5 Prosecutions/notices served 2019-2020 Hygiene Improvement Notices – 13 Hygiene Emergency Prohibition Notice – 0 Hygiene Emergency Prohibition Order – 0 Simple Cautions issued – 0 Prosecutions – 0 4.6 Sampling Visits 4.6.1 The Sampling Officer (EHO) was on extended sick leave for a significant proportion of the year but despite this the team still managed to achieve a total of 18 sampling visits during 2019-2020. The target for 2020-2021 is to complete all planned sampling visits, as stated in the new 2020-2021 sampling plan. 4.7 Promotional activities 4.7.1 Leaflets were distributed to butchers for ongoing distribution to their customers regarding barbecue and turkey safety during appropriate seasonal periods. Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
4.8 The current Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic 4.8.1 The Current pandemic resulted in the FSA suspending the inspection programme nationally before the end of the year. All of the outstanding 43 interventions were low risk premises due questionnaires and not a full inspection. They had all been sent a questionnaire and the team was in the process of calling each premises to chase there return. If the FSA had not suspended the work programme it is anticipated that they would have all been contacted and the questionnaires completed over the phone and the programme completed. Typists\PRINT ROOM\Environmental Services
You can also read