Face to face, blended and online learning

Page created by Enrique Day
 
CONTINUE READING
Face to face, blended and online learning
CAP Digital Learning Project

March 2014

DLP (Digital Learning Project) is committed to help academics who are interested in
moving some of their courses in a blended/online mode. This document serves to
explain some of the terminology involved to facilitate clear communication about the
plans and possibilities.

Definitions

We are all familiar with face to face (or “in person”) teaching – it has been the main
staple of delivering learning in an educational setting for a very long time. Typically
students attend on campus lecture and tutorials with materials delivered in hard copy
(textbooks, handouts, reading bricks, etc).

Technology Enhanced Language Learning (TELL) or Computer Aided Language Learning
(CALL) have been around for a while now. In fact these terms have been used to
describe the use of technology to facilitate/enhance/promote learning a second
language since the early 90’s. See here for more information.

There has been an interest in utilizing technology to deliver some of the instruction
and/or content via technological methods, from CD-based resources in the early days to
the internet and a Learning Management System1 (LMS) in more recent years. Blended
(or “flexible”) learning is this kind of learning – the idea is to integrate the traditional
face to face instruction with technology-based asynchronous activities and resources
that students access and use in their own time. In many cases students come on campus
to participate in lecture and tutorials and this is supported with learning materials, self-
marking quizzes, etc in a LMS.

Online learning (or “distance education”) is the next step in TELL or CALL where there is
no on campus component to the course. The course is primarily conducted through the
LMS using the resources and activities often present in a Blended course plus
synchronous “virtual classrooms” – live tutorials or lectures using webcams and
microphones. This approach allows students to conduct communicative activities
(similar to those normally present in a face to face situation) but from places other than
the classroom. Technology is moving rapidly in this area and with the introduction of

1   such as Wattle
“virtual worlds” it is also now possible to create learning instances that closely match
real life situation.

In CAP we have been referring to courses with a blended learning or online learning
design as “digital courses”.

Wiki articles on blended and online learning
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blended_learning
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distance_learning

What are the benefits of using blended/online course designs?

These are just some of the comments of academics using the blended/online approach
in CHL:

McComas Taylor
     “More flexible - can reach students all over the world, boosts enrolments,
     students can access content asynchronously - where and when they want - can
     access on mobile devices , can review whenever they want, free from tyranny or
     distance and time”

Carol Hayes
       “In my language teaching, students are introduced not only to textbook based
       learning but to authentic material drawn from a variety of media such as
       literature, film, internet, songs, TV and other popular media. I encourage my
       intermediate Japanese language learners to step from a controlled text-based
       environment to a more open ‘real’ exposure by providing easy access to such
       authentic listening/viewing material. In my area studies courses, I emphasise the
       importance of grounding commentary about Japanese society and culture in
       primary sources, such as literature, film and popular cultural production (songs,
       fashion).

       Blended learning allows me to drawn on this wealth of 'real' material to create a
       more up-to-date and flexible teaching and learning space that encourages
       students to look up from the nuts and bolts of their textbook learning and to
       take a more holistic view which focuses on the exchange meaning and the
       ‘cultural envelope’ that surrounds that meaning.

       Blended learning, including both face-to-face teaching and access to such digital
       activities as online listening and video viewing, voice recording, online quizzing
       with immediate feedback, allows me to create an intensive Japanese language
       program for studying ‘out-of-country’ in Australia.
Blended learning allows me to achieve learning outcomes over and beyond the
       possibilities of the traditional classroom. For example my students participate in
       an online simultaneous e-chat with university students in Japan, they record the
       conversation and transcribe it later to review and reflect on their own language
       use and the language used by their Japanese partner. In another task after
       reviewing a TV news item, students are asked to interview respondents and
       record their responses to the issue under discussion and to then incorporate
       segments of these recordings into their in-class analysis group-
       presentations. This are just two examples of the multiple modes I employ in my
       teaching delivery to engage different learning styles: in-class, face-to-face, one-
       on-one, pair-work, group work, debates, in-class presentations, on-line
       discussion (both written and voiced), online quizzing, live eChat, self-study and
       course site interaction. Online tasks allow students the flexibility of working in
       their own space at their own pace, and to re-listen to the conversations or
       dialogues. Further through feedback and modelling tasks in the online
       environment, as class time is more limited, I am better able to better develop
       understanding of pronunciation issues and voicing techniques.

       Blended learning provides student autonomy and as Larry Vandergrift
       notes, “language programmes emphasizing autonomy will likely foster student
       motivation, since perceptions of freedom of choice and perceived competence
       are linked to more self-determined forms of motivation” (Vandergrift, 2005: 73,
       "Relationships among Motivation Orientations, Metacongnitive Awareness and
       Proficiency in L2 Listening" )

  Chintana Sandilands
      My experience has been that the time taken to create resources and activities
      for my Thai courses using a blended/online approach has translated into time
      saved in preparing and marking later on. Each subsequent year I save time in
      preparation. I can build on what I have already created in my courses, and my
      students have more varied resources as time goes by. My technology skills are
      also improving as I work on my course site and materials. I now feel more and
      more comfortable using technology in my teaching.

How much time will it take to make my course a blended/online offering?

Time depends on the kind of resources and activities you will build within the LMS and
what currently is available in your course already. Our experience has been that with
some courses, if everything is created from scratch, it can require you using anything up
to 10/12 hours each week for a semester to do this with DLP support and in some cases
additional personnel resources. But once the material is done it can be used over and
over again. In other cases, where pre-existing materials can be re-purposed, the time
investment might be half that.

Time also depends on the level of technical expertise of the academic working on the
project but the DLP is happy to support/train to achieve a basic level of self sufficiency.

In talking about time we also need to point out that the time “invested” to say create
self marking quizzes (for example) is then time saved in marking and often the same
quizzes are used year after year, lectures pre-recorded is also extra time that you can
use in other activities with your students.

How much will it cost?

The cost developing a digital course varies a great deal according to the technologies
chosen, the amount of pre-existing material that can be re-purposed, and the expertise
and experience of the teaching staff. Courses in development with the Digital Learning
Project vary from $5K to $15K. The cost of teaching staff, teaching relief for the course
coordinator, and language specialist teaching assistants are borne by CHL, and the cost
of software and equipment, plus educational design and technology advice and
development is covered by the Digital Learning Project.

Examples of technology supported language courses for you to explore:

Language Learning Space
http://www.lls.edu.au/

Chinese virtual world to learn Chinese
http://www.experiencechinese.com/index.php/sl

Open Culture Language Online
http://www.openculture.com/freelanguagelessons

Spanish MOOC
http://spanishmooc.com/

Chinese Language and Culture Open to Study Courses
https://www.open2study.com/courses/chinese-language-culture

The Big Welsh Challenge (a big thank you to McComas for showing us this one)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/learnwelsh/bigwelshchallenge/
Virtual Worlds in learning – example of Second Life to learn Chinese
http://www.experiencechinese.com/index.php/sl
You can also read