EML Cancer Medicines Working Group - Elisabeth de Vries on behalf of the EML Cancer Medicine Working Group - WHO | World Health ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
EML Cancer Medicines Working Group Elisabeth de Vries on behalf of the EML Cancer Medicine Working Group
Essential Medicines List of the World Health Organization for solid tumors Hormonal Immune checkpoint Chemotherapeutic medicines Targeted agents Supportive medicines medicines inhibitor Bleomycin Gemcitabine Erlotinib Abiraterone Nivolumab Allopurinol Calcium folinate Ifosfamide Gefitinib Anastrozole Pembrolizumab Mesna Capecitabine Irinotecan Afatinib Bicalutamide Zoledronic acid Carboplatin Methotrexate Trastuzumab Leuprorelin Filgrastim Cisplatin Oxaliplatin Imatinib Prednisolone Cyclophosphamide Paclitaxel Tamoxifen Vinblastine Dactinomycin Vincristine Docetaxel Vinorelbine Doxorubicin Etoposide Fluorouracil 21st WHO Model List of Essential Medicines (March 2019, Amended March 2020)
ESMO International Consortium study Cyclo Cyclo Etoposide MTX MTX Country: Anastrozol Bleomycin Capecitabine Carboplatin Cisplatin (IV) (tab) DTIC Docetaxel Doxorubicin Epirubicin (IV) 5-FU Ifosfamide Irinotecan (IV) (tab) Oxaliplatin Paclitaxel Tamoxifen VBL VCR Trastuzumab Imatinib Argentina Australia Canada Chile High Income Cyprus Israel Japan Korea, South Kuwait New Zealand Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Singapore United Arab Emirates USA Uruguay Venezuela Algeria Upper middle Income Brazil China Colombia Cuba Dominican Republic Always Ecuador Iran Iraq Usually Kazakhstan Lebanon Half the time Malaysia Mexico Occasionally Peru South Africa Never Suriname Thailand Not available Tunisia Turkey Missing data Bangladesh Egypt El Salvador Lower middle Ghana India Income Indonesia Kenya Mauritania Morocco Myanmar Pakistan Palestine Philippines Sudan Vietnam Zambia Cherny et al, Afghanistan Burkina Faso Ann Oncol 2016 Income Cambodia Low Haiti Malawi Nepal Tanzania Uganda Zimbabwe
WHO EML 2017, Cancer Medicines Working Group • The Expert Committee recommended establishment of an EML Cancer Medicines Working Group • to coordinate comprehensive evaluation of available treatment options, across treatment lines and including recently approved medicines • to support WHO in establishing guiding principles, clarifying what constitutes a clinically relevant therapeutic effect, for granting the status of essential medicine to a cancer medicine
EML for cancer until now • Cancer medicines listed since 1st list in 1977 • The last 3 updates doubling of listed cancer medicines, including: • Addition of biologicals • 2nd-line therapies • Immune checkpoint inhibitors • 57 medicines, 12% of all listed EML medicines. • Medicine selection • Curative treatments got highest priority based on delivered benefit (cure or extended survival) • Threshold for benefit adopted in 2019 by the Expert Committee: 4-6 months survival benefit & ESMO-MCBS score A and B or score 4-5 • Many remain unaffordable at country level • Comparisons of WHO EML and national EMLs for cancer highlights differences across countries. Cancer, the clinical discipline, where most countries fall short and often diverge by listing medicines not recommended by WHO. ➢ Therefore, there a potential role for guidance on medicines for countries
Countries of the members Cancer Medicine Working Group 2020-2021
Proposals for EML procedure • Available in the WHO website ➢Unsolicited proposals: 1. Pharmaceutic companies 2. Other clinical groups ➢Solicited proposals: Cancer Medicine working group decided to ask which cancer medicines were considered relevant: 1) ESMO (ESMO Guideline committee) 2) Indian National Cancer Grid 3) Contacts Latin American countries →Cancer Medicine working group indicated which medicines relevant 1. Proposals requested from ESMO 2. Secretariat EML commissioned other proposals •
The general principles for the consideration of essential cancer medicines by the working group • Efficacy / benefit • A threshold for benefit: ≥ 4-6 months survival gain • ESMO-MCBS score of A or B (curative setting), or 4 or 5 (non-curative setting) • Type of trials • Availability of data from >1 trial • Data from high-quality RCTs most important; data must be mature to assess impact on overall survival; data should show consistent results across trials • Information about deployment of cancer regimens in countries with varying resources and clinical capacity useful • Trials defining need for and length of maintenance therapy are of interest (< treatment durations that compromise efficacy marginally or not at all, might reduce outlays and allow more patients treatment access) • Superiority trials preferred to non-inferiority trials, but non-inferiority trials can be informative • Disease stage and line(s) of therapy • Medicines effective in 1st-line are more clinically meaningful and therefore highly desirable • Indication to be listed • Inclusion of a medicine on the Lists for an indication does not imply it should be considered essential for other indications
Submissions received for cancer medicines for 2021 EML • 23 submissions, ~ 30% of all applications to be reviewed: • 16 applications for new cancer medicines ▪ 7 applications for hematological indications ▪ 9 applications for solid tumor indications ▪ (5 x mAb, 7 x targeted therapies, 2 x hormones, 1 x cytotoxic, 1 x supportive) • 6 applications for new indications for existing listed cancer medicines • 1 submission reviewing the available evidence for CAR-T cell therapy (not proposed for EML inclusion at this time). →Including 6 applications specifically for children’s cancer – new medicines (2) and new indications for existing medicines (4)
Results application evaluation by the working group • 16 applications for new medicines – 4 supported by the working group o Haem adult – x1 ibrutinib CLL o Solid adult – x1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC o Solid children – x1 everolimus SEGA o Supportive children – x1 rasburicase • 6 applications for new indications for existing listed medicines – all supported by the working group o Children – 10 new indications (7 solid, 3 haem) for 15 currently listed medicines (mostly cytotoxics and corticosteroids, only imatinib targeted) o Adults – 2 new indications for 2 currently listed medicines (1 x solid (carboplatin head/neck), 1 x haem (imatinib ALL))
The enormous issue of high medicine prices
Monoclonal antibodies per disease area Mullard, Nat Rev Drug Discov 2021
WHO initiatives regarding cancer medicines • WHO Technical Report Pricing of cancer medicines and its impacts (https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/277190) • Updated WHO Guideline on country pharmaceutical pricing policies (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240011878) • Pilot procedure for Prequalification of Biotherapeutic Products and Similar Biotherapeutic Products (trastuzumab and rituximab). To date, 9 PQ’d trastuzumab and 6 PQ’d rituximab) • WHO cancer prioritization and costing tool: In WHO report on cancer: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-report-on-cancer-setting-priorities-investing- wisely-and-providing-care-for-all • WHO Global cancer initiatives: 1. Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer (https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/global- initiative-for-childhood-cancer) 2. Global strategy to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240014107) 3. Global breast cancer initiative (https://www.who.int/news/item/08-03-2021-new-global-breast-cancer-initiative-highlights- renewed-commitment-to-improve survival#:~:text=A%20major%20new%20collaborative%20effort,an%20estimated%202.5% 20million%20deaths.)
Conclusion: EML and Cancer • Increasing number of patients with cancer • Many good cancer medicines • More good cancer medicines to come • Unequal access to cancer medicines • High prices of cancer medicines make them often unaffordable
Acknowledgment • Cancer Medicine Working Group members • EML staff at WHO
You can also read