Emergency Housing Vouchers Office Hours - July 6, 2021
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Emergency Housing Vouchers Office Hours This resource is prepared by technical assistance providers and intended only to provide guidance. The contents of this presentation, except when based on statutory or regulatory authority or law, do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. This presentation is intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies. July 6, 2021
EHV Office Hours July 6, 2021 Audience: Continuums of Care, Public Housing Agencies, Victim Service Providers, and other partners. Purpose: Share information and provide an opportunity to ask EHV- related questions to HUD Today’s Focus: Implementing EHVs in Rural Communities If you’re experiencing homelessness and in need of assistance: https://www.hudexchange.info/housing-and-homeless- assistance/homeless-help/
Today’s Agenda • Welcome & Introductions • Rural Communities’ Challenges • Community Presentations on EHVs in Rural areas, working with multiple PHAs and Coordinated Entry referrals • Q+A with HUD
Logistics • This is session is being recorded. Recording will be shared at https://www.hud.gov/ehv • All participants are muted. If you are having trouble connecting your computer audio, you can call in using the following information: • +1 646 558 8656 • Webinar ID: 998 7192 2141 • Passcode: 110590 • Please submit your questions in the Q&A box • If you are having technical issues, please use the Q&A box
Speakers & Resource Advisors Department of Housing and Urban Development • Office of Public and Indian Housing • Jerrianne Anthony • Danielle Garcia • Chad Ruppel • Emily Warren • Caleb Kopczyk • Mike LaRiccia • Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs • Caroline Crouse TAC • Emila Sutton • Lisa Sloane • Laura Harris
Speakers & Resource Advisors Speakers: • Ashley Barker Tolman, HUD TA Provider, Member SNAPS Rural Workgroup • Ashley Kerr, HUD TA Provider, Member SNAPS Rural Workgroup • Heather Dillashaw, HUD TA Provider, Co-Lead SNAPS Regional Teams Initiative • Gordon Levine, Louisiana Balance of State CoC • Ashley Von Hatten, North Carolina Balance of State CoC
Community Context • Communities across the country have received record amounts of funding through the CARES Act and the American Rescue Plan • EHVs provide an unprecedented opportunity to drastically reduce homelessness in communities across the country • Rural communities must capitalize on this opportunity to help people experiencing homelessness get housed 7
Common Challenges re: EHV implementation • Existing challenges to adequately implement CE across large geographies with equitable prioritization • How to effectively utilize service dollars attached to EHVs • Lack of housing stock in rural areas accepting regular HCV, causing hesitancy for expanding referrals for EHVs 8
Existing challenges to adequately implement CE across large geographies • Specific prioritization criteria may not be clear and/or isn’t being implemented well within existing CE systems. • Lack of fully functioning CE systems compromises ability to effectively make EHV referrals. • Lack of confidence in the VI-SPDAT/assessment process is compounding challenges to address equity concerns. 9
Multiple PHAs for one CoC • Low capacity at CoC level to design and implement a process to refer to multiple EHV programs • Because there is no simple answer on how to do this, CoCs need to be willing to adjust process over time as referrals are made • Idea from one CoC: Create a by-name list that is sortable by County, and engage partners in each jurisdiction to review 10
Lack of Housing Stock in Rural Areas • Consider Landlord Incentives • Eligible activity for service fees attached to EHVs • Seek out faith-based partners for new landlord introductions • Consider Shared Housing model to utilize multiple bedroom units • 2-bedroom potentially more available • Shared expenses for households/individuals • Consider AirBNB and other short-term rental options and propose longer-term rentals 11
5 Possibilities to Consider Identify who is not at the table as you move forward to make critical decisions around targeting & prioritization • People with lived experience in your local homeless system • Black, Indigenous, and People of Color community representatives and/or providers with these existing relationships 12
5 Possibilities to Consider MOU between PHA and CoC • Build in equity analysis and ongoing improvement language • Example: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bBQi6UMd0knYUzjs amt4abZiXbJgSmkR/edit 13
5 Possibilities to Consider Prioritization • LOTH - look at your BNL/queue - who would be prioritized if you focused on LOTH and does that further or hinder your equity goals? • Communities most impacted by COVID - who would be prioritized if you focused on people in non-congregate shelter? Specific communities/neighborhoods that have been impacted? • Disproportionality in housing: look at overall homeless demographics, then by project type (or just SO/ES/TH vs RRH/PSH). Who tends to get enrolled in housing programs, and does that match the demographics of those who aren’t housed? 14
5 Possibilities to Consider Look at Your Data • Leverage the Stella P Race & Ethnicity Analysis Guide: https://www.hudexchange.info/resource/6067/stella- p-race-and-ethnicity-analysis-guide/ • Look at performance and pathways by race (days experiencing homelessness, exits to permanent destinations, and returns to homelessness) • Triangulate Stella P data with other data (PIT, active prioritization list/queue, other data available) to determine if different data sets show similar or different trends 15
5 Possibilities to Consider Look at Your Data, Continued • When analyzing trends in the data, be inclusive about the perspectives at the table - ask the questions of why the data is trending the way it’s trending – incorporate qualitative analysis • Ask those who have been directly affected about what solutions they would suggest would fix the disparities 16
Implementing Service Fee Dollars • PHAs are able to contract for service fee activities • Why partner with CoCs? • They know the population and the service providers. • They often provide services and therefore PHAs don't have to create new programs: PHAs can subcontract out to the CoCs and let them offer the services. • CoCs will be responsible for providing PHAs with data and reporting for EHV program compliance. 17
EHVs Rollout in the Louisiana Balance of State CoC Gordon Levine, Continuum of Care Manager Louisiana Housing Corporation glevine@lhc.la.gov www.laboscoc.org
Louisiana Balance of State CoC A primer
The LA BOSCOC The Louisiana Balance of State Continuum of Care (LA BOSCOC) is Louisiana’s largest coalition of organizations dedicated to preventing and ending homelessness. Currently covers ~half of Louisiana, including the cities of Baton Rouge (the capital), Lake Charles, Houma, and all surrounding parishes.
The LA BOSCOC (continued) Louisiana Housing Corporation (the statewide finance agency) is the Collaborative Applicant. LA BOSCOC has existed since 2015, and has merged with other CoCs ~every other year since then – a lot of growth!
Emergency Housing Vouchers The plan
EHVs: The Plan Initial awards indicated we could expect ~150 EHVs CoC- wide (actual numbers turned out ~100). Statewide PHA and Baton Rouge PHA received larger allocations, but 60 EHVs were awarded to five PHAs in rural parishes whom we’ve never engaged!
EHVs: The Plan (continued) THE BIG CONCEPT: On July 1, use EHVs to do the following two things: (1) Move people from short-term PH and PH being eliminated into long-term subsidies (2) Use EHVs to create system movement in RRH/PSH
EHVs: The Plan (continued) Why focus on people in short-term PH? Short-term PH like ESG-CV RRH is expensive, and we knew going into it that many of our ESG-CV RRH participants would need longer term subsidies; EHVs are their golden tickets. ESG-CV is precious one-time funding; save it where we can.
EHVs: The Plan (continued) Why focus on people in PH being eliminated? Because it’s a lot of people! Example: Baton Rouge lost ~60 HOPWA beds due in part to federal formula adjustments; 50% of those participants were experiencing homelessness at entry and were likely to exit back into homelessness; EHVs are also their golden tickets.
EHVs: The Plan (continued) Why create system movement? PSH is expensive; some participants are ready to move on. RRH is short-term; many participants need or would benefit from a longer subsidy but don’t necessarily need more 24 months of case management. Right-sizing housing & services creates opportunities.
Emergency Housing Vouchers Implementation
EHVs: Implementation Key pieces of our EHV implementation Commit to having sufficient referrals READY TO GO on July 1 Identify people in PH being eliminated (CARES, HOPWA) Identify VAWA transfers, PSH move-on, RRH step-up Does that fill up the EHVs in the area? If not, pre-pull names from the CES Prioritization List and have outreach workers get them ready to go.
EHVs: Implementation (continued) Key pieces of our EHV implementation Develop one MOU for use with all PHAs Takes the burden off of PHAs Uniform commitments means each PHA’s EHV is just as good as another’s Being specific about service fee uses and priorities means a high standard of care for all participants
EHVs: Implementation (continued) Key pieces of our EHV implementation Help DV partners coordinate referrals to PHAs DV providers and PHAs don’t always have strong connections CoCs have comparatively loud voices Incorporating DV (incl. SA and HT) participants into our EHV prioritization increases equity for everyone
Emergency Housing Vouchers Outcomes
EHVs: Outcomes Headline Successes Louisiana Housing Corporation: 34 out of 34 referrals on Day 1! East Baton Rouge Parish PHA: 64 out of 64 referrals on Day 1! St. Bernard PHA: 3 out of 15 referrals – but delay was due to ensuring a high quality DV implementation; 15 out of 15 by July 6!
EHVs: Outcomes Headline Successes 100% of referrals came with ROIs, certifications of homelessness, backup documentation of homelessness (as applicable), certifications of Coordinated Entry origination 100% of referrals were passed securely to PHAs via an unbroken chain of secure email servers and/or flash drive delivery 95%+ of referrals were pre-contacted and pre-confirmed they were ready and waiting for an EHV!
EHVs: Outcomes Domestic Violence HOPWA (Eliminated) (including SA and HT) 15% 22% PSH Move-on 17% Literal Homelessness 9% RRH/Other PH Bridge 37% HOPWA (Eliminated) PSH Move-on RRH/Other PH Bridge Literal Homelessness Domestic Violence (including SA and HT)
Questions? You can also email questions to Gordon Levine, Continuum of Care Manager, at glevine@lhc.la.gov, or call at 225-242-1388.
North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness Emergency Housing Vouchers
NC BoS CoC Emergency Housing Vouchers NC Balance of State (BoS) Continuum of Care (CoC) represents 79 out of the 100 counties in the state.
NC BoS CoC Emergency Housing Vouchers • North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness (Collaborative Applicant) • Created internal EHV team • Outreach to EHV-allocated PHAs • Created EHV workgroup • Developed timeline. • Discussed eligible populations and preferences for NC BoS CoC. • Created implementation and process strategies. • Directed staff to draft NC BoS CoC MOU (needs Steering Committee approval). • NCCEH to prepare individual MOUs for each PHA (in NC BoS) who accepted EHV.
NC BoS CoC Emergency Housing Vouchers Priorities 1) Households are ready to Move On with long-term rental assistance but less intensive case management • Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) and Rapid Rehousing (RRH) clients are both eligible for Move On. Process • NC BoS CoC HMIS staff to provide report of households with longest stay in PH • Current PH provider • Completes Moving On Assessment • Contacts household to discuss Moving On • Completes Moving On referral and gives to Regional NC Bos CoC CE Lead • Regional NC BoS CoC CE lead completes EHV referral form
NC BoS CoC Emergency Housing Vouchers Priorities 2) Households with highest length of unsheltered homelessness and where documentation for PSH (chronic homelessness and/or disability) is not able to be obtained. Process • Regional NC BoS CoC CE will review the current CE by-name list • Filter for chronically homeless, disability, current living situation, and length of stay • Discuss eligible households with most recent Front Door provider and identify households to be referred • Regional NC BoS CoC CE lead completes EHV referral form
NC BoS CoC Emergency Housing Vouchers Priorities 3) Families and/or individuals on current regional Coordinated Entry (CE) by-name list (BNL) who need long-term rental assistance. Process • Regional NC BoS CoC CE will review the current CE by-name list • Filter for VI-SPDAT score and length of stay • Discuss eligible households with most recent front door provider and identify households to be referred • Regional NC BoS CoC CE lead completes EHV referral form
NC BoS CoC Emergency Housing Vouchers Please reach out to North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness bos@ncceh.org
Q+A with HUD 44
Reminders • New EHV Reporting Notice: Reporting will be in PIC using the regular 58 with 2n = EHV • PIH2021-20 (hud.gov) • MOU deadline is July 31, 2021 • Submit your questions to ehv@hud.gov • This office hour recording will be posted to hud.gov/ehv 45
Thank you!
You can also read