Elena Losero - INDICO @ INAF

Page created by Katherine Beck
 
CONTINUE READING
Elena Losero - INDICO @ INAF
Elena Losero
 e.losero@inrim.it

 EMPIR-17FUN01 - BeCOMe
 EMPIR-17FUN06 - SIQUST
 Li ght-matter interplay for optical
 metrol ogy beyond the classical spatial Si ngle-photon s ources as new
 res olution limits qua ntum standards

COST Action MP1405 NATO Project FQXi Project FET Open project - Pathos

 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Elena Losero - INDICO @ INAF
Our team

 QUANTUM OPTICS GROUP
 at INRIM, Torino (ITALY)

Siva Elena Paolo Ivo P. Marco Christian S. Tobias Ulrik L.
Pradyumna Losero Traina Degiovanni Genovese Jacobsen Gehring Andersen

Ivano Ruo- Massimo Stefano Olivares
Berchera Zucco (Univ. Milano)
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Elena Losero - INDICO @ INAF
Introduction

 Systems of two
interferometers Theory
 can be
 interesting for
 testing Planck [PRL 110, 213601 (2013),
 scale physics PRA 92, 053821 (2015)]

 Can quantum light
 enhance the
 sensitivity of a
 system of two
 interferometers? Experiment

 Quantum light Paper under review
 can help in [arXiv:1810.13386]
 enhancing the
 sensitivity of
 one
interferometer

 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Elena Losero - INDICO @ INAF
New theories for Planck scale

 Several heuristic QG theories predicts non-commutativity of position variables at Planck scale:
Systems of two
interferometers
 can be
 interesting for
 testing Planck = 5.40 × 10 −44 s
 scale physics

 Fundamental space-time uncertainty principle called “holographic noise (HN)”

 [C. Hogan, Arxiv: 1204.5948; C. Hogan, PRD 85, 064007 (2012)]:

 How can we have experimental access to this noise?

 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Elena Losero - INDICO @ INAF
Looking for “macroscopic” effects

 In a Michelson interferometer holographic noise accumulates as a random walk (bounded by a
 single light round trip, = 2 / ) becoming detectable for L sufficiently high.
 Systems of two
 interferometers
 can be
 interesting for
 testing Planck 1

 d
 scale physics 
 2

 d 

[C. Hogan, Arxiv: 1204.5948; C. Hogan, PRD 85, 064007 (2012)] HN spectrum: for L ∼ 40 m the maximum is in the MHz region

 High sensitivity is required.
 How it can be distinguished by other noise sources?

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Elena Losero - INDICO @ INAF
Correlated interferometers for HN

 HN should be correlated in the two interferometers if they are
 in the same space time volume
 Systems of two
 [C. Hogan,interferometers
 Arxiv: 1204.5948; C. Hogan, PRD 85, 064007 (2012)]
 can be
 interesting for
 Even
 testingifPlanck
 the HN is hidden by the photon shot noise in one interferometer, it could emerge in the
 scale physics
 cross-correlation between two of them.
 Shot noise is uncorrelated and therefore is statistically washed away.

HOLOMETER HN lower bounded to 10−20 m/ Hz in the MHz
 region of the spectrum after 165 h of acquisition.

 = 2 KW
 = 40 m
 nome, date e luogo della conferenza

[PRL 117, 111102 (2016)]

 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Elena Losero - INDICO @ INAF
Other applications of correlated interferometry

 Fundamental noise at the Planck scale in quantum gravity model
Systems of two
interferometers [First Measurements of High Frequency Cross-Spectra from a Pair of Large Michelson Interferometers, PRL 117,
 can be 111102 (2016)]
 interesting for [PRD 85, 064007 (2012)]
 testing Planck
 scale physics
 Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background
 (10-36 to 10-32 seconds after the Big Bang, whereas the Cosmic Micro-wave Background was produced
 300,000 years later)

 [Search for a Stochastic Background of 100-MHz GW with Laser Interferometers, PRL 101, 101101 (2008)]
 [Upper limits on a stochastic GW background using LIGO and Virgo interferometers, PRD 85, 122001 (2012)]

 Traces of primordial blackholes

 [MHz gravitational wave constraints with decameter Michelson interferometers, PRD 95, 063002 (2017)]

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Elena Losero - INDICO @ INAF
Quantum light in one interferometer
 (theory)
 Vacuum Squeezed states of light are injected from the antisymmetric port.
 1 2
 Ψ = 0 = exp ( ∗ 2 − + ) = e 
 2

 sq
 + +
 =
 2
 Δ Δ − + 

 d
 =
 2 

 coh
 Δ Δ 
 Quantum light
Uncertainty can
 on help
 one in
 of the quadrature is below the vacuum
 enhancing the
 −2 
 sensitivity of Var < Var 
 2
 ∆ = one
 2
 interferometer
 Var < Var 

 Vacuum squeezed states of light from can enhance the phase sensitivity of an interferometer

[Caves, PRD 23, 1693 (1981)] nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Elena Losero - INDICO @ INAF
Squeezed light experimentally works!

 The use of vacuum squeezed states is now exploited in several gravitational wave detectors

 2.15 ± 0.05 dB
 Quantum enhancement

[R. Schnabel et al., Nature Commun. 1, 121 (2010), Ligo, Nature Phys. 7, 962 (2011)]
And many others
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Elena Losero - INDICO @ INAF
Coming back to our question…

 Systems of two
Systems of two
 interferometers
interferometers
 can be
 can be
 interesting for
 interesting for
 testing Plancktesting Planck
 scale physicsscale physics
 Can quantum light
 enhance the
 sensitivity of a
 system of two
 interferometers?
 Quantum light Quantum light
 can help in can help in
 enhancing the enhancing the
 sensitivity ofsensitivity of
 one one
interferometer interferometer

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Quantum light in two interferometers

 [PRL 110, 213601 (2013),
 PRA 92, 053821 (2015)]

Two independent squeezed states Two mode squeezing (Twin Beam)
 Ψ 1 2 = 2 00 1 2 = exp ( ∗ 1 2 − + +
 1 2 ) 00
 
Ψ 1 2 = 1 1 2 2 0 1 ⊗ 0 2 ∞
 1 
 ෍ , 1 2
 1+ 1+ 
Quadrature squeezing =0

 • Photon number entanglement:
 −2 1
 
 ∆2 1 = 1 = 1e 1 Ψ 1 − 2 Ψ 1 2 =0
 2 Δ2 1 − 2 = 0

 −2 2 • Quadrature correlations:
 2
 ∆ 2 = 2 = 2 e 2
 2 −2 
 2
 ∆ ( 1 − 2 ) = = e 
 2

 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Quantum light in two interferometers
 1 2

 [PRL 110, 213601 (2013),
 PRA 92, 053821 (2015)]

 Two independent squeezed states Two mode squeezing (Twin Beam)

 ∆2(∆ 1 ∆ 2) × < ∆2(∆ 1∆ 2) ∆2( 1 − 2) < ∆2( 1 − 2) 

 ∆2(∆ 1 ∆ 2) × < ∆2(∆ 1 ∆ 2) 

Correlated signal can emerge better from the Correlated signals are deleted in the subtraction,
noise. uncorrelated signals can emerge.

Obs: the quantity C considered is different in the two cases
 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Theoretical results

 • 0 central working phase
 Uncertainty (normalized to SNL)
 • detection efficiency
 • number of photon of quantum light
 • number of photon of coherent state

 Ph Numb Quadrature Green region is for TWB advantage
 ENTANG correlations with respect to double squeezing

 TWB leads to disruptive advantages!
 = (cos Τ2) 2 ≈ 1
 …Unfortunately this regime is extremely
 challenging for real experiments

[PRL 110, 213601 (2013), PRA 92, 053821 (2015)]

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Experimental set-up:
 The classical part
▪ Read-out AS port operated
 close to the dark fringe
 (LIGO, HOLOMETER) M

▪ 2-D Power recycling cavity M

 90% reflectivity (gain =10) 0.92 
▪ We focus around 13.5 MHz,
 being the system shot-noise M
 MI 1
 limited at this frequency PRM BS

 Laser M MI 2
 1064 nm BS
 PRM BS

 I1

 Isolator
 I2

 Isolator
 Antisymmetric port,
[arXiv:1810.13386] classically unused

 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Experimental set-up:
 Quantum states injected
▪ Two possibility explored M

 M

▪ Data are differently analyzed in the two
 cases
 M
 BS
 MI 1
 PRM
▪ Instead of a real TWB we consider a single
 squeezed beam split by a BS: they present Laser M MI 2
 PRM BS
 BS
 same correlation between quadrature

 Isolator
 I1

 I2

 Isolator
 Quantum states injected
 Squeezed Squeezed
 Vacuum Vacuum
 Squeezed
 Vacuum

 I1⨉ I2 I1- I2
 [arXiv:1810.13386]

 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Set-up details
 Adder

 lC - lD
 lC

 PZT
 “CARM” M
 PID

 EOM
 LO
 20 MHz Mixer PD

 PD
 M
 PRM PZT lC + lD

 Adder
 Laser Beam
1064 nm Focusing
 BS
 EOM Isolator
 PRM
 LO
 7.6 MHz

 Isolator
 “DARM” lD -1
 PID
 PD Mixer

 LO “Phase” Beam Squeezer
 37.22 MHz PID Focusing
 Mixer PZT EOM
 (36.7 MHz)

 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Experimental results
 (time domain)

 • Correlated white noise injected (about 1/5 of the shot noise level)
 • About 3dB of squeezing in each interferometer
• The cross correlation peak emerges at the increasing of the measurement time
 • Noise floor reduced by SQ injection

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Experimental results
 (time domain)

 Time measurement
 reduction

• SNR improves with the usual statistical scaling samples
 • Correlated white noise injected (about 1/5 of the shot noise level)
• SNR is twice when •squeezing is injected
 About 3dB of squeezing in each interferometer
• 4 times
 • Thereduction in the measurement
 cross correlation time
 peak emerges at demonstrated
 the increasing of the measurement time
 • Noise floor reduced by SQ injection

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Experimental results
 (frequency domain)

 3 dB
 10 dB

N spectra =1000

 • A correlated white noise is injected (amplitude around 1/5 of the photon shot
 noise of each MI), its detection is easier when squeezing is injected
 • CLSD reduces the shot-noise contribution

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Experimental results
 (frequency domain)

 Plateau
 corresponding to
 the amplitude of
 the signal

 The CLSDs scale
 as spectra−1/4

 The maximum
 sensitivity measured
 is 3 ⋅ 10−17 m/√Hz

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Experimental results
 (time domain)

 Var( 1 − 2) (dB)
 2.5 dB

• Quadrature correlation leads to noise reduction in the difference of the photon
 currents
 Δ2 1 − 2 < SNL = 1 + 2

• 2.5 dB of squeezing measured in the output subtraction

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Experimental results
 (time domain)

 0.3 dB

 Var( 1 − 2) (dB) 1 dB

• Uncorrelated white noise injected
• The noise emerge better when TWB is used
• This enhancement might be applied to identify uncorrelated noise sources, such
 as scattering or unwanted resonances

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Experimental results
 (frequency domain)

Single MIs
 Output subtraction

 -2dB

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Conclusions

Detecting faint stochastic noises is
important in fundamental physics quests, Correlation techniques are used to boost
to experimentally test Planck scale effects the sensitivity of the single device of orders
 of magnitude. At the moment with only
(gravitational wave background, quantum classical light.
gravity fluctuations…)

Quantum light is currently used in single
interferometers to boost their sensitivity Single mode Squeezed light and TWB
below the SNL provide an enhancement in the sensitivity
 of coupled interferometers

 Combining cross-correlation techniques
We have realized a table top experiment
 and quantum enhancement we have
mimicking the design of large scale devices
 demonstrated 1-2 order of magnitude
demonstrating quantum advantage, in two
 sensitivity improvement with respect to the
possible configurations
 single interferometer

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Conclusions

Detecting faint stochastic noises is
important in fundamental physics quests, Correlation techniques are used to boost
to experimentally test Planck scale effects the sensitivity of the single device of orders
 of magnitude. At the moment with only
(gravitational wave background, quantum classical light.
gravity fluctuations…)

Quantum light is currently used in single
interferometers to boost their sensitivity Single mode Squeezed light and TWB
below the SNL provide an enhancement in the sensitivity
 of coupled interferometers

 Combining cross-correlation techniques
We have realized a table top experiment
 and quantum enhancement we have
mimicking the design of large scale devices
 demonstrated 1-2 order of magnitude
demonstrating quantum advantage, in two
 sensitivity improvement with respect to the
possible configurations
 single interferometer

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
Conclusions

Detecting faint stochastic noises is
important in fundamental physics quests, Correlation techniques are used to boost
to experimentally test Planck scale effects the sensitivity of the single device of
 orders of magnitude. At the moment
(gravitational wave background, with only classical light.
quantum gravity fluctuations…)

Quantum light is currently used in single
interferometers to boost their sensitivity Single mode Squeezed light and TWB
below the SNL provide an enhancement in the
 sensitivity of coupled interferometers

 Combining cross-correlation techniques
We have realized a table top experiment
 and quantum enhancement we have
mimicking the design of large scale
 demonstrated 1-2 order of magnitude
devices demonstrating quantum
 sensitivity improvement with respect to
advantage, in two possible configurations
 the single interferometer

 nome, date e luogo della conferenza
 The Time Machine Factory 2019 – Torino – September 22-25
You can also read