AR IMPACT IN INDUSTRY - DEPLOYING AND SCALING AUGMENTED REALITY - ALBERTO TORASSO, DAQRI
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
AR IMPACT IN INDUSTRY DEPLOYING AND SCALING AUGMENTED REALITY IN SIEMENS ALBERTO TORASSO, DAQRI SENIOR ACCOUNT MANAGER
AGENDA • Introduction to DAQRI • 3 Case Studies With Siemens - Gas Turbine Servicing - Wind Turbine Servicing - Wind Turbine Inspection • Best Practices For Creating Real AR Solutions
DAQRI WORLDWIDE DUBLIN MILTON KEYNES • Headquartered in Los BATTLE VIENNA DETROIT Angeles, CA • Founded in 2013 LOS ANGELES • 300 employees across 7 offices in 4 countries
DAQRI SOFTWARE PLATFORM Analytics API Services Analytics CORE Apps Camera Remote Expert 4D Studio Custom Applications Enable app Remote Expert API Remote Expert Desktop 4D Viewer Thermal development at scale by providing Enable easy and/or a common set of WYSWIG Editor automated content tools and services creation at scale across hardware platforms Unity Extension PUBLIC API Work Package Eclipse Plug-in C / C++ Creation Engine Form Factor Extensions Customer Portal Operating System UI FW CV RGB Thermal Security Auto HUD Connectivity Multimedia Display Sensors Depth System Services Device Management Enable commercial deployments at scale Hardware User Management SMART GLASSES HOLOGRAPHIC SMART HELMET HUD Support and Resources 5
UNITY EXTENSION DAQRI SDK that allows developers to create and deploy apps to SMART DSH DE via Unity DEVICES A man ag ed solu tion f or th e en terprise. C++ API Public APIs that provides access to DAQRI Hardware and services, enabling native development and integration with existing applications
CASE STUDY 1 GAS TURBINE SERVICING DAQRI and Siemens created an application to improve the key servicing task of burner assembly.
GAS TURBINE SERVICING CASE STUDY NORMAL TECHNICIAN TRAINING PROCESS • 6 weeks in the classroom • 7 weeks of hands on training • On the job training with someone more experienced • After 3 years, certified as turbine fitter
CAN AR MAKE IT BETTER?
GAS TURBINE SERVICING CASE STUDY BURNERS CONNECTS TO GENERATOR
GAS TURBINE SERVICING CASE STUDY
GAS TURBINE SERVICING CASE STUDY TIME TO FIRST BURNER ASSEMBLY WITH DAQRI SMART HELMET 60 52 45 48 45 TIME IN MINUTES 40 30 15 0 Novice 1 Novice 2 Refresher Expert
GAS TURBINE SERVICING CASE STUDY COMPARE TIME TO FIRST ASSEMBLY FOR NOVICE WORKERS NORMAL WITH DAQRI SMART HELMET 600 500 480 400 TIME IN MINUTES 300 200 100 45 52 0
GAS TURBINE SERVICING CASE STUDY PREDICTING ADOPTION SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE MANAGEMENT END USER END USER DRIVEN ADOPTION SUPPORTED DRIVEN ADOPTION ADOPTION EXPERT 73 73 USER GROUPS REFRESHER 85 85 85 NOVICE 85 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 SYSTEM USABILITY SCORE • Brooke, J. (1986/1996). SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(194), 4-7. • Sauro, J. (2011). A practical guide to the System Usability Scale: Background, Benchmarks & Best Practices. Denver, CO: Measuring Usability LLC.
GAS TURBINE SERVICING CASE STUDY KEY TAKEAWAYS ERROR SPEED EFFICIENCY CONFIDENCE REDUCTION • Typically takes a day to • No instructor required • Novices felt empowered • No users made any complete first assembly and “safe“ when using errors in assembly using vs. 45 min with AR • More intuitive learning the App to complete the the app • Access to reference assembly • Learned knowledge • Refresher noted being immediately applied information more quickly reminded of things he forgot “Without the helmet, “Humans are very visual, If “With support like this, I “It helped me see some learning this assembly I can interact with the would be able to do any things I didn’t remember would take me a day” drawings in 3D like this it assembly” from when I originally makes understanding wrote the assembly novice participant #2 them a lot easier, novice participant #1 procedures” especially if I have to deal with new components that refresher participant #1 I have never built before” expert participant #1
CASE STUDY 2 WIND TURBINE SERVICING DAQRI and Siemens Wind Power (now Siemens Gamesa) created an application to improve servicing of critical yaw control motors using AR.
WIND TURBINE SERVICING CASE STUDY YAW MOTORS
WIND TURBINE SERVICING CASE STUDY
WIND TURBINE SERVICING CASE STUDY TIME TO COMPLETE FIRST SERVICING WITH DAQRI SMART HELMET 100 80 77 TIME IN MINUTES 60 40 40 30 20 0 Novice Refresher Expert
WIND TURBINE SERVICING CASE STUDY PREDICTING ADOPTION SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE MANAGEMENT END USER END USER DRIVEN ADOPTION SUPPORTED DRIVEN ADOPTION ADOPTION EXPERT 73 73 USER GROUPS REFRESHER 48 85 NOVICE 71 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 SYSTEM USABILITY SCORE • Brooke, J. (1986/1996). SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(194), 4-7. • Sauro, J. (2011). A practical guide to the System Usability Scale: Background, Benchmarks & Best Practices. Denver, CO: Measuring Usability LLC.
WIND TURBINE SERVICING CASE STUDY KEY TAKEAWAYS ERROR SPEED EFFICIENCY CONFIDENCE REDUCTION • Learned knowledge is • Add order to a • All participants felt safe • No users made any immediately applied traditionally non-ordered while wearing the helmet errors in servicing the without need for process allowing for to complete their tasks yaw motor classroom instruction measurement and improvement • Most felt equally as • Refresher noted that the • The refresher noted he aware of their linearity added by the he felt he was notably • Novices are largely able surroundings while using app helped him ensure faster using the app than to learn the process on AR save 1 participant he was completing the re-learning from their own right steps reference materials Refresher participant #1 “It won’t take a person “The technology supports noted that he felt faster long to learn how to use it” a field technician to do the completing tasks with AR right thing on the and could see himself expert participant #1 equipment” using it on a daily basis in the future. novice participant #2
CASE STUDY 3 WIND TURBINE INSPECTION DAQRI and Siemens Wind Power (now Siemens Gamesa) created an application to support inspection of wind turbine hubs before shipment to assembly site.
WIND TURBINE INSPECTION CASE STUDY HUB
App to their job/hub inspection, if there was anything that the App could better address, WIND TURBINE INSPECTION CASE STUDY and any additional comments. FIGURE 4. At left: Inspector completing the 9 inspection points using current methods. At right: Inspector completing the 9 inspection points using the DAQRI AR App, wearing the DAQRI Smart Helmet DE.
WIND TURBINE S I NESRPVEI C ITNI O G NC C AASE S ES T SUTU DDYY
DAQRI 11 SIEMENS-GAMESA WIND TURBIN CASE E I NSTUDY SPECTION CASE STUDY DAQRI Result s SIEMENS-GAMESA CASE STUDY Time Savings Accuracy and Quality Preparation 3 Current Method Current Method Walking from office DAQRI AR Condition N U M B E R O F TA R G E T S N AG S Inspection 2 CONDITION Walking back to office DAQRI AR Condition Post-processing 1 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 0 TIME (MINUTES) INSPECTOR 1 INSPECTOR 2 Figure 5. Mean time to complete each component of the hub inspection, using DAQRI AR technology Figure 6. There were three target snags placed inside the hub. The inspectors missed one of three versus current methods. Error bars show standard deviation (SD). snags using current methods, but identified and documented all three snags using the DAQRI AR App, run on the DAQRI Smart Helmet DE. Current condition (min) DAQRI AR Condition (min) In the current method (i.e., non-AR) condition, both Inspector 1 and 2 missed the “missing eye bolt” snag. Furthermore, in this condition, Inspector 2 placed two fluid-spill-related Mean SD Mean SD snags (i.e., not target snags), for total of four snags.
WIND TURBINE INSPECTION CASE STUDY KEY TAKEAWAYS ERROR SPEED EFFICIENCY CONFIDENCE REDUCTION • the two inspectors were • Add order to a • All participants felt safe • Both inspectors missed 43.85% faster using the traditionally non-ordered while wearing the helmet one of the three target DAQRI AR App, as process allowing for to complete their tasks snags using current compared to current measurement and methods. They found all methods improvement • Novice were able to go three in the AR condition. trough an inspection • The DAQRI AR App • The DAQRI AR App process that before • Linear flow guided condition was 725.15% preparation time was would have taken long to inspectors in the faster than current shorter than current learn inspection, which was methods, post-inspection, methods because all more accurate and of thanks to automatic inspection points were higher quality, as generation of a report already in the App, compared to current methods “Less documentation “Don’t forget an inspection “Guidance, quality, “Same inspection Every afterwards ” point, easy data collecting, reassurance” time” easy handover to a “Better quality, more novice colleague” novice consistent inspections” manaager inspectors #1 and #2
M A D E W I T H D A Q R I V OS™ S D K AND OVER 200+ MORE COMPANIES
AR BEST PRACTICES EXPAND! MEASURE RESULTS THE RIGHT UX USER CENTERED DESIGN GO TO REAL ENVIRONMENTS
You can also read