Cordillera Valley Club - Mauriello Planning Group
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Cordillera Valley Club
Design Review Board
Meeting Agenda
CVC DRB Members
Michael Curren Date: January 27, 202 Location:
Via Zoom
Steve McKeeve Time: 11:00 a
Jeff Townsen
Bobby Lad
Project Reviews (11:00 am
Veit Residence - Final Plan Review of a New Hom
139 Juniper Ridge Road / F1 L
Owner: Amanda and Andrew Vei
Architect: Pavan Kruege
Landscape Architect: Kathy Aalto, Ceres
d
d
t
r
m
:
r
)
5
t
1
+
e
Cordillera Valley Clu
Design Review Boar
Staff Memorandum
Owner: Amanda and Andrew Veit
Address: 139 Juniper Ridge Road
Legal Address: Filing 1, Lot 5
Architect: Pavan Krueger
Staff Contact: Allison Kent, AICP
DRB Hearing #1: September 23, 2020
DRB Hearing #2: January 27, 2021
Project Descriptio
• Applicant is requesting a Final Plan Review
• New single-family residence located at 139 Juniper Ridge Roa
• Total oor area is 4,831 sq. ft. plus 1,077 sq. ft. of garage and 109 sq. ft. of mechanical are
• There are a total of 3 enclosed parking spaces and an additional surface parking are
• Wild re Hazard Rating is HIGH
P.O. Box 4777 970.390.853
Eagle,1Colorado
Page of 14 8163 Allison@mpgvail.com
fi
fl
0
1
n
d
b
d
a
a
FINAL REVIEW - January 27, 202
Project Revie
A Architecture Comment
1. The roof of the crow’s nest has been modi ed from a gable to a shed roof form,
based on the DRB’s comments from the Sketch Plan Review. Staff believes that
this is a positive change and consistent with the direction from the DRB
2. The applicant has indicated that they are still working on the proposed dog run.
Based on that issue, staff recommends that the current design for the dog run not
be approved with this application and should return to the DRB for review of the dog
run.
3. The applicant has provided a materials and color board. At the Sketch Plan review,
the DRB indicated their concern about the stone color and lay-up and its
consistency with the Design Guidelines, which state:
3.5.1 STONE
Design Considerations
• All buildings shall include stone. No less than 35% of exterior wall surfaces shall be stone.
“Exterior wall surfaces” include all exterior walls of a building with the exception of chimneys.
All chimneys must be stone, or a combination of stone and metal. The stone applied to the
chimneys shall count toward satisfying the minimum 35% requirement.
• In order to visually tie a building to its site, stone should be used around the base of all buildings
(with the exception of copper referred to in Section 3.5 above), however, care should be taken
to avoid the appearance of a standard height “wainscot” surrounding the entire building.
• Appropriate stone materials include stone indigenous to the area, or stone indigenous to the
Rocky Mountain region. River rock is not permitted.
• Stone should be laid in an informal horizontal coursing to emphasize structural appearance,
with deep rake mortar joints. Stone should have an irregular rectangular shape and larger pieces
should generally be laid below smaller pieces. Or, if stone is not laid horizontally, the
appearance of the stone must meet the structural design character of the home.
• Other complementary stone may be used in order to add accent and variety to a building. Stone
may be blended. Applications of complementary stone include lintels, band courses, wall caps
or complementary stone integrated with the primary stone materials.
• Stone should appear structural, not as a veneer. Arches in stone must include voussoirs or
similar structural detailing.
Staff recommends that the DRB provide guidance on the proposed stone, and
recommends a condition noting that nal material approvals is to occur based on a
mock-up per the Design Guidelines.
B. Site Plan and Landscape Plan Comment
1. The site plan indicates that the access to the home, which is via a portion of Juniper
Ridge Road right-of-way. This needs to be reviewed and approved by the CVC Metro
District and memorialized in an encroachment agreement (link: https://mpgvail.com/
Page 2 of 14
.
w
s
fi
1
s
fi
.
wp-content/uploads/2020/07/CVC-EncroachmentAgree-Template_06.30.20.pdf). This
shall occur prior to Technical Review submittal.
2. The plans have been provided to Marcin Engineering for review of any additional
impacts to CVC rights-of-way. Any additional comments provided following Final Plan
approval shall be addressed prior to Technical Review Submittal
3. The site is has a “High Wild re Rating.” The wild re offset shall be indicated on the
landscape plan and all plantings shall comply with Eagle County requirements.
4. The applicant has indicated a small pond water feature on the landscape plan. Little
detail is provided on the design of the pond or on the drain line indicated on the plans.
Staff recommends additional detail be provided prior to Technical Plan approval. As
an alternative, the pond could be removed from the plans and a separate application
submitted at a later date once additional design work has been completed.
5. Per the direction of the DRB from the Sketch Plan Review, the additional parking
space adjacent to the garage has been removed. Staff believes this is a positive
change and is consistent with the direction from the DRB. However, there are still
signi cant retaining walls located outside the building envelope along the west of the
garage, which the DRB was concerned about at the Sketch Plan review. Staff
recommends that the DRB provide guidance to the applicant about this area.
6. The wall adjacent to the garage is approximately 6 ft. in height. All retaining walls
over 4 ft. are required to be stamped by a P.E. A stamped retaining wall detail shall
be provided for Technical Review.
7. Plantings indicated on the landscape plan to screen the electrical utility box are
subject to standards and regulations of the utility holders. These plantings are shown
off property within the Metro District’s right-of-way. The applicant will need to obtain
approval of these plantings from the Metro District (included in the encroachment
agreement) and comply with utility provider requirements both of which can be
con rmed at Technical Review.
8. The address marker location and design shall be provided at Technical Plan Review.
9. Some retaining walls and a small area of roof overhang are located outside of the
building envelope. The applicant has submitted for a Deviation from the Design
Guidelines to allow for these improvements for Final Plan Review. Staff believes the
deviations are reasonable and consistent with the Design Guidelines, though
concerns are noted about the walls to the west of the garage. The DRB must make
the following ndings to approve a deviation
a) The proposed encroachment does not affect views from surrounding homesites
b) The proposed encroachment does not substantially reduce the distance between
homesites on lots
c) The proposed encroachment allows for a more sensitive design solution by
minimizing site grading, the loss of mature vegetation, and/or other
considerations, an
d) The proposed encroachment will allow for a design that is consistent with the
overall design philosophy and design style for the Cordillera Valley Club
C. Adjacent Neighbor Comment
Page 3 of 14
fi
fi
fi
;
d
fi
s
:
fi
.
.
;
Public notice to adjacent properties was provided on January 14, 2021. Questions and
comments were received by the Jim O’Neill who owns the adjacent property at 140
Juniper Ridge / F1 L4. The O’Neills are primarily concerned about the pond, drainage
impacts of the pond on their property, and ensuring that the erosion control fencing is
maintained throughout the construction project. Correspondence has been copied
below
Hi, thanks for ge ng back to us. I certainly understand your concerns, and
appreciate you pu ng trust in the DRB and our team. I’m sure you’ll all enjoy
each other- the Veits are really fun people!
Stay in touch if anything comes up that you’d like to discuss.
Thanks,
Pavan
Pavan Krueger
Krueger Architecture
970-390-0968
From: Jim O'Neill
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 1:24 PM
To: Pavan Krueger ;
andrew.m.veit@gmail.com; holminvail@gmail.com; Amanda Veit
; Kathy Aalto
Cc: Kent Allison ; O'Neill Joan
Subject: Re: CVC DRB Neighbor No ca on of a Final Review for the Veit
Residence at 139 Juniper Ridge / F1 L5
Pavan - Thank you for the addi onal informa on and insights.
Andrew and Amanda - Joan and I look forward to mee ng you and
welcoming you to the neighborhood. You will love it in CVC. Your plans for
your new home look awesome. We bought in 2019 and are mostly Summer
residents at our home in CVC but do come out in the winter every so o en.
This year COVID has kept us mostly at our home in St. Louis since we
departed CO in September (luckily we have not had COVID but just staying
Page 4 of 14
:
tti
tti
ti
ti
fi
ti
ti
ti
ft
local so as to not get it). Hopefully we will get a chance to meet you this
summer, if not sooner.
All:
Between what Allison explained and Pavan provided below, we are now
con dent the silt and construc on barrier will properly protect our property
from any debris, dirt or silt ow from the construc on site.
Regarding the boulder wall, given the steepness of the grade from the
boulder wall to our home, I am sure you understand our concern that these
boulders be properly retained to prevent any damage to our home. It sure
sounds like the construc on team is well posi oned to provide the needed
integrity given what Pavan provided below. I will defer to the CVC DRB to
provide any further assessment and approval of the boulder walls.
On the pond, I am likewise sure you understand our concerns. I appreciate
that the Veits have built many of these before. I will defer to the CVC DRB on
how, when and in what stages the pond construc on will be evaluated and
approved while keeping in mind our concerns.
Feel free to contact us if anyone wants to discuss this further but we are
comfortable with the informa on to date and the CVC DRB process going
forward.
It looks like it is going to be a busy summer in the cul-de-sac. The Dominguez
home will likely have some ongoing work, the build of the Veit home on Lot
5, possible development of Lot 3 on the other side of us and we plan to have
a new roof installed.
Again, we really appreciate the transparency from everyone on this and we
truly look forward to mee ng Andrew and Amanda and watch their home
come to reality in 2021.
All the best,
Jim and Joan O’Neill
Page 5 of 14
fi
ti
ti
fl
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
314-705-8889 (Jim’s cell)
On Jan 20, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Pavan Krueger
wrote:
Hello O’Neills and Veits, Allison Kent from CVC DRB forwarded your thoughts
to me regarding the Veit project next door to you. I have copied the whole
team here so that we can all be aware of your concerns.
I believe Allison spoke to you about the silt/erosion fencing and boulder
retaining walls, and hopefully reassured you that Claes Holm is a great
builder and works to industry standard and details supplied by the landscape
architect. I have worked with him on many houses, and he is very fas dious,
and works with a great pool of sub-contractors. The boulder retaining walls
are all 4’ or less, so they’re not required by the building department to be
engineered, but they will be constructed with adequate drainage, lay back
and back span to be structurally solid.
The pond will be constructed in spring of 2022, when the project will be
nearing comple on and landscaping will be installed. The owner, Andrew
Veit, will be building the pond (with subs installing the liner, boulders, and
plumbing). He has built several pond/water features and is knowledgeable
about systems. He will likely be using a company that will spray a poly-urea
lining, which is used o en in commercial applica ons. The pond will be self
contained, and he noted that what is described on the plans as a 4” drain line
would actually be a 4” lter clean out. One of the ponds he built is at their
current house in East Vail- I imagine he could send photos and a descrip on
if you’d like.
Please feel free to reach out if you want to discuss any details or if you have
further ques ons or concerns. We realize that having construc on above you
is not ideal but we will work as a team to minimize impact to you and your
site.
Best regards,
Page 6 of 14
ti
ti
ft
fi
ti
ti
ti
ti
Pavan
Pavan Krueger
Krueger Architecture
970-390-0968
From: Allison Kent
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 2:36 PM
To: Pavan Krueger
Subject: Fwd: CVC DRB Neighbor No ca on of a Final Review for the Veit
Residence at 139 Juniper Ridge / F1 L5
Hi Pavan -
Received some ques ons/comments from neighbors. Forwarding onto you
Allison Kent
Mauriello Planning Group
970.390.8530
www.mpgvail.com
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jim O'Neill
Subject: Re: CVC DRB Neighbor Noti cation of a Final Review for
the Veit Residence at 139 Juniper Ridge / F1 L5
Date: January 18, 2021 at 5:32:08 AM MST
To: Allison Kent
Cc: O'Neill Joan
Allison,
This is Jim O’Neill (F1/Lot 4, 140 Juniper Ridge). Joan and I have reviewed
the plans you sent us and, given our home is directly below the proposed
Veit home, we do have a few concerns we would request the CVC DRB
address at your nal review:
Page 7 of 14
fi
ti
ti
fi
ti
fi
1) We would like con rma on the construc on Silt Fence and other erosion
barriers being put up during construc on are adequate and far enough away
from the property line to prevent erosion piling up on our property. The
plans currently are not exactly clear where these barrier will be installed.
2) The pond/water feature on the plans appears to be for reference only
since it states the owners plan to install this a er construc on - at least that
is how we read it. Also, the pond/water feature has a 4” drainage pipe
coming out of it. We are concerned about the following regarding this pond/
water feature:
a) How will this pond/water feature be approved - now or in the future given
it appears it will be installed at a later date?
b) How can we be assured the pond/water feature is properly sealed so that
it does not leak into the ground and create water or erosion problems for us
down the hill from it?
c) How can we be assured the 4” drainage pipe does not drain onto our
property?
3) The stone walls they have in the backyard are ne and look nice. Our
concern is proper construc on such that they cannot come loose and roll
down the hill onto our property/house. Will this wall be constructed such
that reten on is proper, adequate and con rmed via inspec on?
If you need anything else from else on these topics, please let us know.
Thank you,
Jim and Joan O’Neill
F1/Lot 4, 140 Juniper Ridge Rd
314-705-8889 (Jim’s cell)
D. Staff Recommendatio
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plan and Deviation Request for the Veit
Residence, subject to the following conditions
1. General Condition: Compliance with the CVC Design Guidelines and process is not
a substitute for compliance with Eagle County regulations, State regulations, or
Federal regulations. Additional permits and approvals may be required by these
agencies prior to commencing any work on the property. The property owner and its
Page 8 of 14
ti
n
fi
ti
ti
ti
:
fi
ti
ft
fi
ti
ti
agents are responsible for ensuring compliance with all local, state, and federal
regulations.
2. As the applicant has indicated that they are still working on the design for the dog
run, the current design for the dog run shall not be approved with this application.
The applicant shall submit a revised design for review and approval prior to
Technical Plan review, or shall remove it from the plans for Technical Plan review
and submit for a “Changes to approved plans” once the design has been nalized
3. Final material are to be approved by the DRB based on a mock-up inspection per
the Design Guideline
4. The plans have been provided to Marcin Engineering for review of any additional
impacts to CVC rights-of-way. Any additional comments provided following Final
Plan approval shall be addressed prior to Technical Review Submittal
5. Plantings indicated on the landscape plan to screen the electrical utility box are
subject to standards and regulations of the utility holders. These plantings are
shown off property. These plantings shall be removed from the plan.
6. Additional detail shall be provided on the proposed pond feature prior to Technical
Plan approval. As an alternative, the pond shall be removed from the plans and a
separate application submitted at a later date once additional design work has been
completed.
7. The applicant shall provide the address marker location and design for review and
approval at Technical Plan Review.
8. With the Technical Plan submittal, the CVC Metro District encroachment agreement
shall be returned to the CVC Metro District for all improvements within the right-of-
way.
9. All walls over 4 ft. shall be stamped by a licensed Professional Engineer for the
Technical Plan submittal
10. The applicant shall address the comments provided in this staff memorandum and
any DRB comments prior to Technical Review
Page 9 of 14
s
.
.
.
fi
.SKETCH REVIEW - September 23, 202
Project Revie
A Architecture Comment
1. Roof pitches are generally 1.5:12 for the primary roof forms, and .25:12 for the at
sod roof. The roof over the entry is at and proposed as membrane with gravel
ballast. The proposed primary roo ng material is standing seam metal. The roof
pitches are relatively at but the DRB has approved similar roof pitches previously.
Due to the location of this lot with little ability to view the roof forms from above, staff
believes the roof pitches are appropriate in this location. The roof is additive in
nature, with a combination of primary and secondary roof forms. The DRB should
provide the applicant with guidance on the roof materials and elements. The
Guidelines state
3.4 ROOF
Objective
• Roofs must be comprised of relatively simple forms with clean connections
• To reflect the additive nature of the architecture of the American West, homes should be comprised of a
combination of primary and secondary roof forms
Roofs are the most prominent visual element of homes at the Cordillera Valley Club. This is
particularly true due to the visibility of homesites from the golf course and the rolling terrain that
characterizes much of the community. In order to ensure visual coherence throughout the
Cordillera Valley Club, all roofs should be comprised of relatively simple forms and should utilize
similar materials and colors that integrate the buildings with the site and surrounding area.
Design Considerations
• Large continuous roof planes must be avoided. Smaller segmented roof forms consistent with
the additive form of the home, or a composition of primary and secondary roof forms shall be
used.
• Roof forms shall be limited to low-pitched gable, shed, or double-pitch roofs in the range of
4:12 to 8:12. 3:12 roofs may be allowed, as well as other roof forms, such as curved roofs or
flat roofs, at the discretion of the DRB.
• Deep roof overhangs are encouraged in order to provide shade, particularly at southern
elevations, and add interest to building elevations. Primary roof overhangs shall be a minimum
of two feet (2’), where as secondary roof overhangs may be eighteen inches (18”) minimum
upon discretion of the DRB.
Roof Materials
• Appropriate materials for primary roof forms include cedar shakes (treated class B rating),
synthetic fire-rated shakes, and slate. Roof materials should be predominantly grey or brown in
color and be compatible with the colors of the main residence. Homesites with a high wildfire
rating must use class A rated roofing materials.
• In addition to the materials listed above, appropriate materials for secondary roofs also include
corten steel, terned metal and copper. The limited use of these materials is appropriate because
of their natural patina. Owners may be required to treat corten steel, terned metal and copper
roofs in order to accelerate the natural weathering process, if at the discretion of the DRB the
Page 10 of 14
.
S
:
w
fl
s
fi
fl
0
flnatural weathering process has not adequately dulled the finish of the roof within six months
after installation.
• Flashing and gutter materials must be consistent with the metal roof systems.
• Prohibited roof materials include:
‣ Glazed tiles
‣ Ceramic tiles
‣ Asphalt or fiberglass shingles
2. The proposed residences appears to comply with the maximum height limitation of
35 ft. However, for Final Plan Review, the roof height plan shall re ect both existing
and proposed grades, and all roof ridge and eave heights shall be noted so staff can
verify the height calculations.
3. Though not dimensioned on the plans, the window trim does not appear to be very
thick and the minimum is 2” members. The DRB should provide the applicant with
guidance on the window trim. The Design Guidelines state:
• Windows and doors in stone mass walls shall be deeply recessed (six to eight inches) or be
trimmed in profiled wood (minimum 2” members) in order to provide interest and relief to
building elevations.
• The use of timber or stone lintels and sills that are proud of the adjacent material is encouraged.
• True divided light windows are the most appropriate to the design style of the Cordillera Valley
Club and must be incorporated in a consistent pattern throughout the home. Snap-in grids
systems are not permitted. In order to maintain a smaller scale, large window openings shall be
composed of smaller panes of glass.
• Window casing shall be wood with natural, stained or clad finish.
• Window and door trim should be selected in concert with other building materials, and be no
smaller than two inch (2”) members.
• Windows of unusual shapes and sizes, and the use of colored, reflective or mirrored glass are
not permitted.
4. The Design Guidelines encourage the use of front porches as a welcoming entry in
to the home. The entry to the proposed home is relatively understated. The DRB
should provide the applicant with guidance on the front porch and entry to the home.
The Design Guidelines state:
3 . 10 E N T RYWAYS/ PO R CHES
Objectives
• To provide a sense of entry to the home, entry porches are required
• All porches shall be an integral part of the overall design
All homes shall have a welcoming, inviting entry designed to enhance the overall look of the
structure and break up the verticality of its facades. The entry defines a place of gathering and
receiving. The entry and front porch can be an opportunity to add individual creative expression, or
a signature architectural statement, to the home.
Page 11 of 14
flDesign Considerations
• Porches must be constructed of materials that complement the materials on the home.
• The use of expressed structure, such as exposed rafter tails, lookout beams and knee braces are
required.
• Porch roofs should be different, in pitch and materials, from the adjacent roof planes.
• Wrap-around porches are encouraged.
B. Site Plan and Landscape Plan Comment
1. The site is has a “High Wild re Rating.” The wild re offset shall be indicated on the
landscape plan and all plantings shall comply with Eagle County requirements. Staff
recommends that prior to Final Plan Review, the applicant ensure that Eagle County
accepts this landscape plan. Any revisions requested by Eagle County shall be
re ected on the landscape plan for Final Plan Review
2. The additional parking space adjacent to the garage seems forced and creates
retaining walls that do not appear to respond well to grade. This area should be
reconsidered as there is more than adequate over ow parking area in the autocourt.
When possible, pavement area should be minimized
3. The landscape plan indicates an 8 ft. retaining wall adjacent to the garage. Other
plans indicate this wall as a 6 ft. wall. Maximum height of retaining walls is 6 ft. All
plans need to be coordinated to accurately re ect site grading and retaining walls.
4. For Final Plan Review, additional detail needs to be provided on the retaining walls.
Some are called out as boulder retaining walls and others do not have materials
called out. Any wall over 4 ft. shall be designed and stamped by a licensed engineer.
5. For Final Plan Review, additional detail should be provided on the landscape plan,
including calling out all proposed tree species.
6. For Final Plan Review, the address marker location and design shall be provided at
Final Plan Review.
7. Some retaining walls and a small area of roof overhang are located outside of the
building envelope. The applicant will be required to submit for a Deviation from the
Design Guidelines to allow for these improvements for Final Plan Review. Staff
believes the deviations are reasonable and consistent with the Design Guidelines.
The DRB must make the following ndings to approve a deviation
e) The proposed encroachment does not affect views from surrounding homesites
f) The proposed encroachment does not substantially reduce the distance between
homesites on lots
g) The proposed encroachment allows for a more sensitive design solution by
minimizing site grading, the loss of mature vegetation, and/or other
considerations, an
h) The proposed encroachment will allow for a design that is consistent with the
overall design philosophy and design style for the Cordillera Valley Club
C. Adjacent Neighbor Comment
Page 12 of 14
fl
;
d
fi
s
fi
s
fl
fi
fl
.
.
:
.
;Public notice to adjacent properties was provided on September 10, 2020. As of the
date of this memo, questions were received regarding construction start date, but no
concerns have been provided.
D. Staff Recommendatio
Staff recommends approval of the Sketch Plan for the Veit Residence, subject to the
following conditions
1. The applicant shall address the comments provided in this staff memorandum and
any DRB comments prior to a Final Plan Review submittal.
E DRB Deliberatio
DRB members Jeff Townsend, Michael Current, and Bobby Ladd were present. Steve
McKeever was absent. Pavan Krueger, Architect and Amanda and Andrew Veit, owners
were present.
Pavan introduced some of the goals of the project, including to keep the living spaces
on one level. The owners love the idea of indoor/outdoor living. They were also
wanting low maintenance materials.
Jeff stated that it would be bene cial to have Eagle County review the landscape plan
for compliance with the wild re regulations. It could change a lot of the landscape plan.
He stated he was ok with eliminating either the stone or wood on the north elevation as
not visible. He was ne with no trim for windows in steel wall forms. He was concerned
about the walls adjacent to the garage as it was a signi cant structural wall outside the
building envelope. The upper wall should at least be a boulder wall
Michael said he was ne with the low roof pitches. He was more concerned about the
gable roof on the crows nest and thought it was odd that it was not a shed roof. He was
also ok with no trim on windows in steel wall forms, but more concerned with corner trim
and corner window details. He wanted additional information on the dog run and any
proposed fencing. He was also concerned about the retaining walls at the west side of
the garage. He stated he was nervous about white stone. He thought the exterior stair
needed structure at base. He was good with the entry and stated that everything was
looking nice.
Bobby stated that he was concerned about the retaining walls adjacent to the garage. It
is a lot of disturbance and likely not the best location for a parking space. He was also
ok with looking at a shed roof on the crows nest. The gable form is not integrated with
the architecture. He liked the north/south stone wall concept and wanted to see it
carried throughout the project more. The dog run needs more information. The walls to
the west of the garage are his biggest issue
The DRB approved the Sketch Review for the Veit Residence with conditions
Motion: Jeff Townsen
Second Michael Curren
Vote 3-
Page 13 of 14
.
:
:
0
:
fi
fi
n
n
d
fi
t
fi
.
fi
.
.Conditions:
1. The applicant shall address the comments provided in this staff memorandum
and any DRB comments prior to a Final Plan Review submittal.
Page 14 of 14VEIT RESIDENCE
MATERIAL SYMBOLS:
DRAWING INDEX:
ARCHITECTURAL:
A0.0 COVER SHEET
FINAL DRB SUBMITTAL
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
L1 SITE/GRADING PLAN
pavan@kruegerarchitecture.com
PO box 8332
970.390.0968
Avon CO 81620
L2 LANDSCAPE PLAN
A1.2 HEIGHT CALCS/ CONST. MGMT. PLAN
LOT 5, FILING 1, 139 JUNIPER RIDGE A2.1 LOWER FLOOR PLAN
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE
1 A2.2 MAIN FLOOR PLAN
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB
A4.00
1
A2.3 ROOF/UPPER PLAN
A4.00 A3.1 ELEVATIONS
A3.2 STONE CALCULATIONS
1
A4.00
1
A4.00
JANUARY 11, 2021 A4.1
A4.2
BUILDING SECTIONS
BUILDING SECTIONS
MAIN
A4.3 BUILDING SECTIONS
100'-0"
1
A5.1 FOUNDATION DETAILS
A4.00
A5.2 ROOF DETAILS
A5.3 ROOF DETAILS
1 ROOM NAME A5.4 STAIR/RAILING DETAILS
1
A5.5 STAIR/RAILING DETAILS
A5.6 WINDOW DETAILS
& DESIGN
4 A8.1 2
W11
A7.1 WINDOW SCHEDULE
3
A8.1 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
11 33
A8.2 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
STN CPT
ABBREVIATIONS:
LOT 5, FILING 1, 139 JUNIPER RIDGE
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB
VEIT RESIDENCE
EAGLE COUNTY, CO
ISSUED FOR: DATE:
DRB PREDESIGN 8-10-20
SCHEMATIC 8-18-20
DRB SKETCH 9-8-20
STRUCT. RFP 9-28-20
PROJECT DIRECTORY: PRICING 10-1-20
FINAL DRB 1-11-21
ARCHITECT GENERAL CONTRACTOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER SURVEYOR SOILS ENGINEER GENERAL NOTES:
PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT SUMMARY SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS
SITE: .938 ACRES = 40,859 SF CODES: INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE 2015 AND ALL ASSOCIATED
LOWER LEVEL SF 2,218
MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL AND FIRE CODES; CORDILLERA VALLEY MAIN LEVEL SF 2,221
SITE COVERAGE: 4,648 SF CLUB PUD DOCUMENT; CVC COVENANTS; CVC CONSTRUCTION RULES AND UPPER LEVEL SF 392 SHEET SCALE:
HEIGHT: 35' FROM HIGHEST POINT OF ROOF TO GRADE AT THAT POINT REGULATIONS; EAGLE COUNTY LAND USE REGS; EAGLE COUNTY WILDFIRE TOTAL LIVING SF 4,831
DRAWN BY: PK
SETBACKS: GOVERNED BY BUILDING ENVELOPE REGULATIONS
GARAGE SF 1,077 PROJECT : VEIT RESIDENCE
MECH./STORAGE 109
CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB C COPYRIGHT 2020
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
OCCUPANCY: GROUP R3 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING) GROSS AREA: 6,017
GROUP U (PRIVATE GARAGES)
COVER SHEET
RATINGS: 1 HR AT GARAGE/RESIDENCE
1 HR AT MECHANICAL/RESIDENCE
A0.07373.57
7374.12
7375.64
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
LOT 5
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB FILING No. 1
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADOPost Office Box 2134 Eagle, Colorado 81631 p: 970.949.3286 f: 970.328.6084
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
MASTER
BEDROOM
OUTDOOR 115
KITCHEN
108
AMANDA'S
CLOSET
114
MASTER
FOYER
113
ANDREW'S
CL
MUSIC MUSIC
BATH CLO.
102 103
BAR
112
PANTRY
107
BED
HALL
011
KITCHEN
109
BED 2
FOYER 016
STAIR ELEV. 105 POWDER
104 003 106
+36" 009
BAR
010
MUSIC
ROOM
101
. FL. ELEV.
100'-0"
STAIR
000
ENTRY
006
FIN. FL. ELEV.
106'-0"
FIN. FL. ELEV.
106'-0"
Viet Residence
139 JUNIPER RIDGE ROAD
FIN. FL. ELEV.
106'-0"
LOT 5 FILING 1 CVC
7375.64
18 November 2020
8 January 2021
7374.12
Title:
SITE PLAN
7373.57
Scale:
1" = 10'
Sheet:
L1
© Ceres Plus, LLC. 2015Post Office Box 2134 Eagle, Colorado 81631 p: 970.949.3286 f: 970.328.6084
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
MASTER
BEDROOM
OUTDOOR 115
KITCHEN
108
AMANDA'S
CLOSET
114
MASTER
FOYER
113
ANDREW'S
CL
MUSIC MUSIC
BATH CLO.
102 103
BAR
112
PANTRY
107
BED
HALL
011
KITCHEN
109
BED 2
FOYER 016
STAIR ELEV. 105 POWDER
104 003 106
+36" 009
BAR
010
MUSIC
ROOM
101
. FL. ELEV.
100'-0"
STAIR
000
ENTRY
006
FIN. FL. ELEV.
106'-0"
FIN. FL. ELEV.
106'-0"
Viet Residence
139 JUNIPER RIDGE ROAD
FIN. FL. ELEV.
106'-0"
LOT 5 FILING 1 CVC
7375.64
18 November 2020
7374.12
Title:
PLANTING PLAN
7373.57
Scale:
1" = 10'
Sheet:
L2
© Ceres Plus, LLC. 2015pavan@kruegerarchitecture.com
PO box 8332
970.390.0968
Avon CO 81620
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE
1.5:12
1.5:12
& DESIGN
1.5:12
1.5:12
1.5:12
1.5:12
1
4"/1
2
AM
NDING SE PED
ONZE STA L SLO
DARK BR P. AT AL
OFING TY S
OF METAL RO ROOF
SOD RO 1.5:12
LOT 5, FILING 1, 139 JUNIPER RIDGE
1.5:12
1.5:12
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB
OF W/ 1.5:12
FLAT RO
NE &
MEMBRA
BALLAST
GRAVEL
1
4"/1
2
VEIT RESIDENCE
EAGLE COUNTY, CO
INT
HIGH PO (33'-6 1/2")
AM
NDING SE
ONZE STA AT ALL SLOPED
DARK BR
CONC. P.
/2 " OFING TY S
111'-6 1
PATIO METAL RO ROOF
OF
E BELOW
SOD RO
A D
EX. GR
80'-0" LOW
RADE BE
PROP. G
78'-0"
INT
HIGH PO '-10")
3
106'-7" (3 E BELOW
R A D
EX. G
OF W/
FLAT RO
NE &
MEMBRA
BALLAST
72'-9" LOW
EL
INT
AV
RADE BE
GR
HIGH PO (34'-3 1/2") PROP. G
3 1 /2 "
107'- 78'-0"
G R A D E BELOW
EX.
CONC. 74'-0" GRADE BELOW
PATIO
PROP.
78'-0"
ISSUED FOR: DATE:
DRB PREDESIGN 8-10-20
SCHEMATIC 8-18-20
DRB SKETCH 9-8-20
STRUCT. RFP 9-28-20
PRICING 10-1-20
FINAL DRB 1-11-21
7375.64
7375.64
7374.12
SHEET SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
DRAWN BY: PK
PROJECT : VEIT RESIDENCE
COPYRIGHT 2020
C KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
HEIGHT CALCS
2
A1.2
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
1
A1.2
BUILDING HEIGHT
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" A1.21
A4.2
pavan@kruegerarchitecture.com
PO box 8332
970.390.0968
Avon CO 81620
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE
016
3
A3.1
BED 1
013
1
A4.1 2
2 A4.1 BATH 1
A4.2
014
015
BIKES
& DESIGN
CLO. 1
015
CLO. 2 BATH 2
018 017 014
T.O. CONC. WINE
100'-0" MECHANICAL MEAT FPHB
GARAGE 007 008
001 W D
2
MUD
A3.1 ROOM
002
LOT 5, FILING 1, 139 JUNIPER RIDGE
GOLF CART LAUNDRY BED
012 HALL
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB
011
A/V 013
4
VEIT RESIDENCE
BED 2
EAGLE COUNTY, CO
A3.1
ART 016
BEV
ELEV. POWDER REF ICE
003 004
REC
ROOM
009 1
BAR A4.3
1 T.O. CONC.
010
A4.3 99'-4 1/2"
LOWER
LANDING DW TRASH
005
010 011 012
SKIS FIN. FL. ELEV.
100'-0"
RE: LANDSCAPE TRASH
001
FOR SITE WALLS
T.O. CONC. REC.
99'-6"
STAIR
000 008 009
STAIR DETAILS- DN
002 003 RE: A5.4 20 R @ 7"
ISSUED FOR: DATE:
007
DN UP DRB PREDESIGN 8-10-20
1 CONC. SCHEMATIC 8-18-20
A4.1 004 ENTRY PATIO
006 DRB SKETCH 9-8-20
FIN. FL. ELEV. CRAWL
NO ACCESS COATS STRUCT. RFP 9-28-20
106'-0"
SNOWMELT BELOW STAIR RE: LANDSCAPE
FOR HOT TUB PRICING 10-1-20
THROUGHOUT DN
LOCATION AND
+ 100'/78' 3 R @ 6" FINAL DRB 1-11-21
DETAILS
005 FIN. FL. ELEV. 006
106'-0" RE: LANDSCAPE
NAPOLEON + 98.5'/76.5'
FOR STEPS AND
CONC. SLOPE GALAXY GSS48 SITE WALLS
PATIO 1 OUTDOOR GAS
4" / FT
FIREPLACE
1
A4.2
DN
3 R @ 6"
SHEET SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2 DRAWN BY: PK
UP 1
A3.1 A4.1 PROJECT : VEIT RESIDENCE
10 R @ 7"
COPYRIGHT 2020
C KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
FLOOR PLANS
UP FIN. FL. ELEV.
2 R @ 7" 106'-0"
A2.1
CONC. 2
PATIO A4.2
1 LOWER PLAN
A2.1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"DOG RUN
1
A4.2
115
DOG
pavan@kruegerarchitecture.com
PO box 8332
970.390.0968
Avon CO 81620
116 DOOR
LYNX
L36TR-NG 36" + 112' 114
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE
GAS GRILL
117 + 104'
BBQ
FPHB
3 MASTER
A3.1 BEDROOM
OUTDOOR 115
KITCHEN
108 ORTAL
110-150
1 GAS FP
A4.1 2
2
A4.2
A4.1
AMANDA'S + 100'
CLOSET
114
124 123 119 118 LIN. W/D FOLDING
FPHB
MASTER
FOYER
WINE 113
120 TOWER 113
& DESIGN
ANDREW'S
122 121 CLOSET
MUSIC MUSIC 116
BATH CLO.
102 103
BEV
BROOMS
DW TRASH ICE COFFEE
REF
DISHES
BAR
DW 112
2
PANTRY 112
A3.1
107
LOT 5, FILING 1, 139 JUNIPER RIDGE
STEAM REF. DBL
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB
MICRO
OVEN OVENS
KITCHEN
109
MASTER
VEIT RESIDENCE
4
MAKEUP
EAGLE COUNTY, CO
TRASH BATH A3.1
FOYER REF 117
STAIR ELEV. 105 POWDER
104 003 106
101 LIVING
+36" FREEZ
111
ART 111
1
A4.3
MUSIC
ROOM UP 10'-0"
101 16 R @ 7.5"
MAIN 109 110
1 LANDING FPHB
A4.3 101
FIN. FL. ELEV. 108
112'-0" DN
10 R @ 7.2"
102
DINING
110 CONC.
CHINA/
LINEN
DECK
STAIR
000 107
DN
20 R @ 7"
ISSUED FOR: DATE:
106
DRB PREDESIGN 8-10-20
DN
10 R @ 7.2" ENTRY SCHEMATIC 8-18-20
1 103 006
LION L75623 CONC.
A4.1 32" GAS GRILL DRB SKETCH 9-8-20
DECK
STRUCT. RFP 9-28-20
FIN. FL. ELEV. ZIOCIRO PRICING 10-1-20
106'-0" SUBITO COTTO
80 WOOD FINAL DRB 1-11-21
BURNING
PIZZA OVEN
104 105
1
A4.2
+106' +115'
LOWER PLAN: 2,218 SF
MAIN PLAN: 2,821 SF
CROW'S NEST: 392 SF
SHEET SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
DRAWN BY: PK
UP 1
A3.1
2
A4.1
TOTAL SF: 5,431 SF PROJECT : VEIT RESIDENCE
10 R @ 7"
COPYRIGHT 2020
C KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
GARAGE: 1,077 SF
MECHANICAL 109 SF FLOOR PLANS
UP
2 R @ 6" + 100'/78'
A2.2
CONC.
MAIN PLAN
2
PATIO
A4.2
1
A2.2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1
A4.2
pavan@kruegerarchitecture.com
PO box 8332
970.390.0968
Avon CO 81620
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE
3
A3.1
2
A4.2
1.5:12
2
1 A4.1
A4.1
& DESIGN
LOT 5, FILING 1, 139 JUNIPER RIDGE
1.5:12
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB
1 1.5:12 1.5:12
4"/12
VEIT RESIDENCE
EAGLE COUNTY, CO
1.5:12
SOD ROOF
207 206 DARK BRONZE STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOFING TYP. AT ALL SLOPED
ROOFS
CROW'S
BATH
202 205
ISSUED FOR: DATE:
CROW'S
NEST DRB PREDESIGN 8-10-20
STAIR 201
104 SCHEMATIC 8-18-20
FIN. FL. ELEV.
122'-0" DRB SKETCH 9-8-20
1 FLAT ROOF W/ STRUCT. RFP 9-28-20
A4.1 MEMBRANE &
GRAVEL BALLAST PRICING 10-1-20
201 FINAL DRB 1-11-21
2
A3.1
1
A4.2
CONC.
PATIO
202 203 204
SHEET SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
DRAWN BY: PK
PROJECT : VEIT RESIDENCE
1 2 COPYRIGHT 2020
A3.1 A4.1 C KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
FLOOR PLANS
2
A2.3
CROW'S NEST PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2
A4.2
1
A2.3
ROOF PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A2.301
pavan@kruegerarchitecture.com
PO box 8332
970.390.0968
Avon CO 81620
DRYSTACK ASHLAR STONE VENEER- RE: COLORBOARD
02 HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
03 STEEL PANEL SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
02
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE
04 DARK BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING 205
05 DARK BRONZE CLAD WOOD WINDOWS
06 FRAMELESS GLASS RAILINGS
07 DARK BRONZE METAL FLASHING AT GRADE AT WOOD SIDING
04
CROW'S NEST F.F.E.
122'-0" 02
05 108 111 112 113 05 114
01 02
06
& DESIGN
MAIN LEVEL F.F.E.
112'-0"
03
01
06
014
ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E.
LOT 5, FILING 1, 139 JUNIPER RIDGE
106'-0"
013 05 015 016
06 010
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB
VEIT RESIDENCE
EAGLE COUNTY, CO
LOWER LEVEL F.F.E.
100'-0"
2 EAST ELEVATION
A3.2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
01 DRYSTACK ASHLAR STONE VENEER- RE: COLORBOARD
02 HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
03 STEEL PANEL SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
02
201 04 DARK BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING
05 DARK BRONZE CLAD WOOD WINDOWS
06 FRAMELESS GLASS RAILINGS
ISSUED FOR: DATE:
04 02
07 DARK BRONZE METAL FLASHING AT GRADE AT WOOD SIDING DRB PREDESIGN 8-10-20
CROW'S NEST F.F.E. SCHEMATIC 8-18-20
122'-0" DRB SKETCH 9-8-20
STRUCT. RFP 9-28-20
PRICING 10-1-20
03 FINAL DRB 1-11-21
02 01 101
103
116 117
05
MAIN LEVEL F.F.E. 07
112'-0"
004 05
01
06
ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E.
106'-0"
01 SHEET SCALE: 81" = 1'-0"
001
001 DRAWN BY: PK
PROJECT : VEIT RESIDENCE
COPYRIGHT 2020
LOWER LEVEL F.F.E. C KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
100'-0"
ELEVATIONS
1
A3.2
WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A3.2pavan@kruegerarchitecture.com
PO box 8332
970.390.0968
Avon CO 81620
04
01 DRYSTACK ASHLAR STONE VENEER- RE: COLORBOARD
02 HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE
206 207
03 STEEL PANEL SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
04 04 DARK BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING
05 DARK BRONZE CLAD WOOD WINDOWS
02 FRAMELESS GLASS RAILINGS
06
07 DARK BRONZE METAL FLASHING AT GRADE AT WOOD SIDING
04
CROW'S NEST F.F.E.
122'-0"
123 124
115 118 05 119 121 122
01
03 06
& DESIGN
MAIN LEVEL F.F.E. 07
112'-0"
ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E.
LOT 5, FILING 1, 139 JUNIPER RIDGE
106'-0"
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB
VEIT RESIDENCE
EAGLE COUNTY, CO
LOWER LEVEL F.F.E.
100'-0"
2 NORTH ELEVATION
A3.1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
01 DRYSTACK ASHLAR STONE VENEER- RE: COLORBOARD
02 HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
03 STEEL PANEL SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
04 DARK BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING 202 203 05 204
05 DARK BRONZE CLAD WOOD WINDOWS
ISSUED FOR: DATE:
06 FRAMELESS GLASS RAILINGS 02 DRB PREDESIGN 8-10-20
07 DARK BRONZE METAL FLASHING AT GRADE AT WOOD SIDING 02 SCHEMATIC 8-18-20
CROW'S NEST F.F.E. 02 DRB SKETCH 9-8-20
122'-0" STRUCT. RFP 9-28-20
PRICING 10-1-20
03
FINAL DRB 1-11-21
05 102 104 105
01 05
106 107 109 110
05
06 06
MAIN LEVEL F.F.E.
112'-0"
005 006
03 03 01
03 01
01
012
ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E.
106'-0"
SHEET SCALE: 81" = 1'-0"
01 007 008 009 05 DRAWN BY: PK
002 003 PROJECT : VEIT RESIDENCE
COPYRIGHT 2020
C KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
LOWER LEVEL F.F.E.
100'-0"
ELEVATIONS
A3.1
1 SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A3.1pavan@kruegerarchitecture.com
PO box 8332
970.390.0968
Avon CO 81620
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE
01 DRYSTACK ASHLAR STONE VENEER- RE: COLORBOARD
04
02 HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD 01 DRYSTACK ASHLAR STONE VENEER- RE: COLORBOARD
03 STEEL PANEL SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
02 02 HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
04 DARK BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING 205 206 207
03 STEEL PANEL SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
05 DARK BRONZE CLAD WOOD WINDOWS
04 04 DARK BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING
06 FRAMELESS GLASS RAILINGS 05 DARK BRONZE CLAD WOOD WINDOWS
02 FRAMELESS GLASS RAILINGS
07 DARK BRONZE METAL FLASHING AT GRADE AT WOOD SIDING 06
04
07 DARK BRONZE METAL FLASHING AT GRADE AT WOOD SIDING
CROW'S NEST F.F.E. 04 CROW'S NEST F.F.E.
& DESIGN
122'-0" 02 122'-0"
05 108 111 112 113 05 114 123 124
115 118 05 119 121 122
01 02 01
06 03 06
MAIN LEVEL F.F.E. 07 MAIN LEVEL F.F.E.
112'-0" 112'-0"
03
01
06
LOT 5, FILING 1, 139 JUNIPER RIDGE
014
ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E. ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E.
106'-0" 013
106'-0"
06 010 05 015 016
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB
LOWER LEVEL F.F.E. LOWER LEVEL F.F.E.
100'-0" 100'-0"
VEIT RESIDENCE
EAGLE COUNTY, CO
4 EAST ELEVATION 3 NORTH ELEVATION
A3.1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A3.1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
ISSUED FOR: DATE:
DRB PREDESIGN 8-10-20
SCHEMATIC 8-18-20
DRB SKETCH 9-8-20
STRUCT. RFP 9-28-20
01 DRYSTACK ASHLAR STONE VENEER- RE: COLORBOARD 01 DRYSTACK ASHLAR STONE VENEER- RE: COLORBOARD
PRICING 10-1-20
02 HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD 02 HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
FINAL DRB 1-11-21
03 STEEL PANEL SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD 03 STEEL PANEL SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
02 04 202 203 05 204
201 04 DARK BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING DARK BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING
05 DARK BRONZE CLAD WOOD WINDOWS 05 DARK BRONZE CLAD WOOD WINDOWS
06 FRAMELESS GLASS RAILINGS 06 FRAMELESS GLASS RAILINGS 02
04 02
07 DARK BRONZE METAL FLASHING AT GRADE AT WOOD SIDING 07 DARK BRONZE METAL FLASHING AT GRADE AT WOOD SIDING 02
CROW'S NEST F.F.E. CROW'S NEST F.F.E. 02
122'-0" 122'-0"
03
03
02 01 101 05 104 105
103 102 01 05
116 117 106 107 109 110
05
05
06 06
MAIN LEVEL F.F.E. 07 MAIN LEVEL F.F.E.
112'-0" 112'-0" 005 006
004 05 03 03 01
01 03 01
06 01
ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E. ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E. 012
106'-0" 106'-0"
01 01 007 008 009 05
001
001 002 003
LOWER LEVEL F.F.E. LOWER LEVEL F.F.E. SHEET SCALE: 81" = 1'-0"
100'-0" 100'-0"
DRAWN BY: PK
PROJECT : VEIT RESIDENCE
COPYRIGHT 2020
C KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
ELEVATIONS
2
A3.1
WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1
A3.1
SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A3.1pavan@kruegerarchitecture.com
PO box 8332
970.390.0968
Avon CO 81620
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE
6 SF 6 SF
20 SF
CROW'S NEST F.F.E. CROW'S NEST F.F.E.
& DESIGN
122'-0" 122'-0"
7 SF 32 SF 6 SF 6 SF
70 SF
16 SF 16 SF 70 SF
48 SF 88 SF
MAIN LEVEL F.F.E. MAIN LEVEL F.F.E.
112'-0" 112'-0"
LOT 5, FILING 1, 139 JUNIPER RIDGE
8 SF
ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E. ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E.
106'-0" 27 SF 106'-0"
44 SF 24 SF
56 SF
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB
LOWER LEVEL F.F.E. LOWER LEVEL F.F.E.
100'-0" 100'-0"
VEIT RESIDENCE
TOTAL WALL AREA NORTH ELEVATION: 993 SF
EAGLE COUNTY, CO
TOTAL WALL AREA EAST ELEVATION: 1529 SF WINDOWS NORTH ELEVATION: 244 SF
WINDOWS EAST ELEVATION: 306 SF NET WALL AREA: 749 SF
NET WALL AREA: 1223 SF TOTAL STONE AREA NORTH ELEVATION: 393 SF
TOTAL STONE AREA EAST ELEVATION: 430 SF
4 EAST ELEVATION 3 NORTH ELEVATION
A3.1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A3.1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
ISSUED FOR: DATE:
DRB PREDESIGN 8-10-20
SCHEMATIC 8-18-20
DRB SKETCH 9-8-20
STRUCT. RFP 9-28-20
PRICING 10-1-20
FINAL DRB 1-11-21
42 SF 15 SF 69 SF
02
CROW'S NEST F.F.E. CROW'S NEST F.F.E.
122'-0" 122'-0"
52 SF
156 SF 57 SF
64 SF 215 SF 188 SF
MAIN LEVEL F.F.E. MAIN LEVEL F.F.E.
112'-0" 48 SF 112'-0" 109 SF
ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E. ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E.
106'-0" 24 SF 106'-0" 40 SF
122 SF
64 SF 144 SF 141 SF
LOWER LEVEL F.F.E. LOWER LEVEL F.F.E. SHEET SCALE: 81" = 1'-0"
100'-0" 100'-0"
TOTAL WALL AREA WEST ELEVATION: 1389 SF DRAWN BY: PK
WINDOWS WEST ELEVATION: 230 SF
NET WALL AREA: 1159
TOTAL WALL AREA SOUTH ELEVATION: 2592 SF
TOTAL STONE CALCULATIONS: PROJECT : VEIT RESIDENCE
TOTAL STONE AREA WEST ELEVATION: 740 SF TOTAL WALL AREA ALL ELEVATIONS: 6503 SF
WINDOWS SOUTH ELEVATION: 1256 SF COPYRIGHT 2020
NET WALL AREA: 1336 SF
WINDOWS ALL ELEVATIONS:
NET WALL AREA:
2036 SF
4467 SF C KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
TOTAL STONE AREA SOUTH ELEVATION: 408 SF TOTAL STONE AREA ALL ELEVATIONS: 1971 SF
PERCENTAGE STONE VENEER: 44%
STONE
CALCULATIONS
2
A3.1
WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1
A3.1
SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A3.2BUILDING NOTES:
· ALL FENESTRATION TO MEET REQUIRED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE MAX U-VALUE .30 01 DRYSTACK ASHLAR STONE VENEER- RE: COLORBOARD
· ALL ROOFS TO BE INSULATED TO MIN. R-49 02
· ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE INSULATED WITH 2" SPRAY
HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
02
03 STEEL PANEL SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
FOAM INSUL. AT EXTERIOR FACE OF CAVITY AND BATT 05
04 DARK BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING
OR BIBS AT REMAINDER OF CAVITY TO ACHIEVE R-24
INSULATION. 05 DARK BRONZE CLAD WOOD WINDOWS
· FLOOR INSULATION TO BE MINIMUM R-30 06 FRAMELESS GLASS RAILINGS
CRAWLSPACE/BASEMENT CONC. WALL INSULATION TO 07 DARK BRONZE METAL FLASHING AT GRADE AT WOOD SIDING
pavan@kruegerarchitecture.com
PO box 8332
970.390.0968
Avon CO 81620
·
BE 2 X 4 FURRING WITH R-13 AT INTERIOR OF WALL
AND R-5 INSULATION AND DRAINAGE PLANE AT CROW'S NEST F.F.E.
EXTERIOR 122'-0"
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE
· WHERE UNCONDITIONED CRAWLSPACE FLOORS ARE
INSULATED TO R-30, CRAWLSPACE WALL INSULATION IS
NOT REQUIRED.
· INSTALL AIR BARRIERS PER IECC TABLE R402.4.1.1
· BOILERS TO BE MIN. 92% EFFICIENT AFUE
· GLASS RAILING RE: STAIR DETAILS
· TYPICAL FRAMED FLOORING ASSEMBLY: FINISHED
FLOORING OVER 1 1/2" GYPCRETE TOPPING W/
IN-FLOOR HEAT, OVER SHEATHING OVER FLOOR JOISTS-
RE: STRUCTURAL
· TYPICAL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR ASSEMBLY: FINISHED MAIN LEVEL F.F.E.
FLOORING OVER 1 1/2" GYPCRETE TOPPING W/ 112'-0"
IN-FLOOR HEAT, OVER SHEATHING OVER FLOOR JOISTS
W/ R-30 INSUL. OVER CRAWLSPACE. MAX. CRAWLSPACE
HEIGHT: 5'-0" 01
· TYPICAL SLOPED ROOF ASSEMBLY: MECHANICALLY
FASTENED STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING W/ SEAM
TAPE OVER ICE AND WATER SHIELD WATERPROOFING ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E.
& DESIGN
OVER RIGID INSUL. OVER SHEATHING OVER 106'-0"
ENGINEERED RAFTERS W/ MIN. R-49 INSUL.- RE: RCP
FOR INTERIOR FINISH. 2 X 6 T & G DECKING AT SOFFIT
· TYPICAL FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY: 3" STONE BALLAST
OVER MEMBRANE ROOFING OVER TAPERED RIGID
INSUL. (MIN. 12" PER FOOT SLOPE) OVER SHEATHING LOWER LEVEL F.F.E.
OVER ENGINEERED JOISTS W/ SISTERED MINIMAL 100'-0"
RAFTERS AT OVERHANG. T & G DECKING AT EXTERIOR
LOT 5, FILING 1, 139 JUNIPER RIDGE
SOFFIT, RE: RCP FOR INTERIOR FINISH. MIN. R-49 INSUL.
· WATERPROOF DECK ASSEMBLY: CONCRETE SLAB,
SLOPED TO EDGE (MIN. 1/8" PER FOOT) OVER
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB
WATERPROOFING OVER SHEATHING OVER SLOPED
JOISTS. T & G AT SOFFIT. WHERE REQUIRED,
VEIT RESIDENCE
EAGLE COUNTY, CO
(OVERHANGS GREATER THAN 4') ADD 58" TYPE 'X' AT
SOFFIT FOR MODERATE FIRE HAZARD RATING.
· TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL TO BE FINISH MATERIAL OVER
BUILDING WRAP OVER SHEATHING OVER 2 X 6 2 SECTION AT LIVING
FRAMING W/ MIN. R-24 INSUL., VAPOR BARRIER AT A4.1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
INTERIOR. RE: FINISH SCHEDULE FOR INTERIOR FINISH
· STEEL BEAM LINTEL OVER WINDOW/DOOR OPENINGS
IN STONE VENEER TYP.
02
04 02
ISSUED FOR: DATE:
CROW'S NEST F.F.E. 01 DRYSTACK ASHLAR STONE VENEER- RE: COLORBOARD
DRB PREDESIGN 8-10-20
122'-0" 02 HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
SCHEMATIC 8-18-20
03 STEEL PANEL SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
DRB SKETCH 9-8-20
04 DARK BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING
STRUCT. RFP 9-28-20
03 05 DARK BRONZE CLAD WOOD WINDOWS
02 01 FRAMELESS GLASS RAILINGS
PRICING 10-1-20
06
FINAL DRB 1-11-21
05 07 DARK BRONZE METAL FLASHING AT GRADE AT WOOD SIDING
MAIN LEVEL F.F.E. 07
112'-0"
05
06
ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E.
106'-0"
01
SHEET SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
DRAWN BY: PK
LOWER LEVEL F.F.E. PROJECT : VEIT RESIDENCE
100'-0" C COPYRIGHT 2020
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
SECTIONS
1
A4.1
SECTION AT GARAGE
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
A4.1BUILDING NOTES:
· ALL FENESTRATION TO MEET REQUIRED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE MAX U-VALUE .30
· ALL ROOFS TO BE INSULATED TO MIN. R-49
· ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE INSULATED WITH 2" SPRAY
FOAM INSUL. AT EXTERIOR FACE OF CAVITY AND BATT
OR BIBS AT REMAINDER OF CAVITY TO ACHIEVE R-24
INSULATION.
· FLOOR INSULATION TO BE MINIMUM R-30
· CRAWLSPACE/BASEMENT CONC. WALL INSULATION TO
pavan@kruegerarchitecture.com
PO box 8332
970.390.0968
Avon CO 81620
BE 2 X 4 FURRING WITH R-13 AT INTERIOR OF WALL
AND R-5 INSULATION AND DRAINAGE PLANE AT
EXTERIOR
· WHERE UNCONDITIONED CRAWLSPACE FLOORS ARE CROW'S NEST F.F.E.
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE
INSULATED TO R-30, CRAWLSPACE WALL INSULATION IS 122'-0"
NOT REQUIRED.
· INSTALL AIR BARRIERS PER IECC TABLE R402.4.1.1
· BOILERS TO BE MIN. 92% EFFICIENT AFUE
· GLASS RAILING RE: STAIR DETAILS
· TYPICAL FRAMED FLOORING ASSEMBLY: FINISHED
FLOORING OVER 1 1/2" GYPCRETE TOPPING W/ 05
IN-FLOOR HEAT, OVER SHEATHING OVER FLOOR JOISTS-
RE: STRUCTURAL
· TYPICAL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR ASSEMBLY: FINISHED
FLOORING OVER 1 1/2" GYPCRETE TOPPING W/
IN-FLOOR HEAT, OVER SHEATHING OVER FLOOR JOISTS MAIN LEVEL F.F.E.
W/ R-30 INSUL. OVER CRAWLSPACE. MAX. CRAWLSPACE 112'-0"
HEIGHT: 5'-0"
· TYPICAL SLOPED ROOF ASSEMBLY: MECHANICALLY
FASTENED STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING W/ SEAM
TAPE OVER ICE AND WATER SHIELD WATERPROOFING
& DESIGN
OVER RIGID INSUL. OVER SHEATHING OVER
ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E.
ENGINEERED RAFTERS W/ MIN. R-49 INSUL.- RE: RCP
106'-0"
FOR INTERIOR FINISH. 2 X 6 T & G DECKING AT SOFFIT
· TYPICAL FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY: 3" STONE BALLAST
OVER MEMBRANE ROOFING OVER TAPERED RIGID
INSUL. (MIN. 12" PER FOOT SLOPE) OVER SHEATHING
OVER ENGINEERED JOISTS W/ SISTERED MINIMAL
RAFTERS AT OVERHANG. T & G DECKING AT EXTERIOR LOWER LEVEL F.F.E.
SOFFIT, RE: RCP FOR INTERIOR FINISH. MIN. R-49 INSUL. 100'-0"
LOT 5, FILING 1, 139 JUNIPER RIDGE
· WATERPROOF DECK ASSEMBLY: CONCRETE SLAB,
SLOPED TO EDGE (MIN. 1/8" PER FOOT) OVER
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB
WATERPROOFING OVER SHEATHING OVER SLOPED
JOISTS. T & G AT SOFFIT. WHERE REQUIRED,
VEIT RESIDENCE
(OVERHANGS GREATER THAN 4') ADD 85" TYPE 'X' AT
EAGLE COUNTY, CO
SOFFIT FOR MODERATE FIRE HAZARD RATING. 2 SECTION AT STAIR
· TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL TO BE FINISH MATERIAL OVER A4.2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
BUILDING WRAP OVER SHEATHING OVER 2 X 6
FRAMING W/ MIN. R-24 INSUL., VAPOR BARRIER AT
INTERIOR. RE: FINISH SCHEDULE FOR INTERIOR FINISH
· STEEL BEAM LINTEL OVER WINDOW/DOOR OPENINGS
IN STONE VENEER TYP.
01 DRYSTACK ASHLAR STONE VENEER- RE: COLORBOARD
02 HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
03 STEEL PANEL SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
02
04 DARK BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING
05
05 DARK BRONZE CLAD WOOD WINDOWS
06 FRAMELESS GLASS RAILINGS
07 DARK BRONZE METAL FLASHING AT GRADE AT WOOD SIDING
CROW'S NEST F.F.E.
122'-0"
ISSUED FOR: DATE:
DRB PREDESIGN 8-10-20
05
SCHEMATIC 8-18-20
DRB SKETCH 9-8-20
STRUCT. RFP 9-28-20
PRICING 10-1-20
FINAL DRB 1-11-21
MAIN LEVEL F.F.E.
112'-0"
01
ENTRY LEVEL F.F.E.
106'-0"
LOWER LEVEL F.F.E.
100'-0" SHEET SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
DRAWN BY: PK
PROJECT : VEIT RESIDENCE
COPYRIGHT 2020
C KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
SECTIONS
1
A4.2
SECTION AT MASTER
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
A4.2BUILDING NOTES:
· ALL FENESTRATION TO MEET REQUIRED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE MAX U-VALUE .30
· ALL ROOFS TO BE INSULATED TO MIN. R-49
· ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE INSULATED WITH 2" SPRAY
FOAM INSUL. AT EXTERIOR FACE OF CAVITY AND BATT
OR BIBS AT REMAINDER OF CAVITY TO ACHIEVE R-24
INSULATION.
· FLOOR INSULATION TO BE MINIMUM R-30
CRAWLSPACE/BASEMENT CONC. WALL INSULATION TO
pavan@kruegerarchitecture.com
PO box 8332
970.390.0968
Avon CO 81620
·
BE 2 X 4 FURRING WITH R-13 AT INTERIOR OF WALL
AND R-5 INSULATION AND DRAINAGE PLANE AT
EXTERIOR
KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE
· WHERE UNCONDITIONED CRAWLSPACE FLOORS ARE
INSULATED TO R-30, CRAWLSPACE WALL INSULATION IS
NOT REQUIRED.
· INSTALL AIR BARRIERS PER IECC TABLE R402.4.1.1
· BOILERS TO BE MIN. 92% EFFICIENT AFUE
· GLASS RAILING RE: STAIR DETAILS
· TYPICAL FRAMED FLOORING ASSEMBLY: FINISHED
FLOORING OVER 1 1/2" GYPCRETE TOPPING W/
IN-FLOOR HEAT, OVER SHEATHING OVER FLOOR JOISTS-
RE: STRUCTURAL
· TYPICAL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR ASSEMBLY: FINISHED
FLOORING OVER 1 1/2" GYPCRETE TOPPING W/
IN-FLOOR HEAT, OVER SHEATHING OVER FLOOR JOISTS
W/ R-30 INSUL. OVER CRAWLSPACE. MAX. CRAWLSPACE
HEIGHT: 5'-0"
· TYPICAL SLOPED ROOF ASSEMBLY: MECHANICALLY
FASTENED STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING W/ SEAM
TAPE OVER ICE AND WATER SHIELD WATERPROOFING
& DESIGN
OVER RIGID INSUL. OVER SHEATHING OVER
ENGINEERED RAFTERS W/ MIN. R-49 INSUL.- RE: RCP
FOR INTERIOR FINISH. 2 X 6 T & G DECKING AT SOFFIT
· TYPICAL FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY: 3" STONE BALLAST
OVER MEMBRANE ROOFING OVER TAPERED RIGID
INSUL. (MIN. 12" PER FOOT SLOPE) OVER SHEATHING
OVER ENGINEERED JOISTS W/ SISTERED MINIMAL
RAFTERS AT OVERHANG. T & G DECKING AT EXTERIOR
LOT 5, FILING 1, 139 JUNIPER RIDGE
SOFFIT, RE: RCP FOR INTERIOR FINISH. MIN. R-49 INSUL.
· WATERPROOF DECK ASSEMBLY: CONCRETE SLAB,
SLOPED TO EDGE (MIN. 1/8" PER FOOT) OVER
CORDILLERA VALLEY CLUB
WATERPROOFING OVER SHEATHING OVER SLOPED
JOISTS. T & G AT SOFFIT. WHERE REQUIRED,
VEIT RESIDENCE
EAGLE COUNTY, CO
(OVERHANGS GREATER THAN 4') ADD 58" TYPE 'X' AT
SOFFIT FOR MODERATE FIRE HAZARD RATING.
· TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL TO BE FINISH MATERIAL OVER
BUILDING WRAP OVER SHEATHING OVER 2 X 6
FRAMING W/ MIN. R-24 INSUL., VAPOR BARRIER AT
INTERIOR. RE: FINISH SCHEDULE FOR INTERIOR FINISH
· STEEL BEAM LINTEL OVER WINDOW/DOOR OPENINGS
IN STONE VENEER TYP.
01 DRYSTACK ASHLAR STONE VENEER- RE: COLORBOARD
02 HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
03 STEEL PANEL SIDING- RE: COLORBOARD
04 DARK BRONZE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING
05 DARK BRONZE CLAD WOOD WINDOWS
06 FRAMELESS GLASS RAILINGS
07 DARK BRONZE METAL FLASHING AT GRADE AT WOOD SIDING
CROW'S NEST F.F.E.
122'-0"
ISSUED FOR: DATE:
DRB PREDESIGN 8-10-20
SCHEMATIC 8-18-20
DRB SKETCH 9-8-20
STRUCT. RFP 9-28-20
PRICING 10-1-20
MAIN LEVEL F.F.E. FINAL DRB 1-11-21
112'-0"
01
LOWER LEVEL F.F.E.
100'-0"
SHEET SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
DRAWN BY: PK
PROJECT : VEIT RESIDENCE
COPYRIGHT 2020
C KRUEGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
SECTIONS
1
A4.3
LONGITUDINAL SECTION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A4.3You can also read
