Conservation status of the dhole Cuon alpinus in north-east India, with a focus on Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram

Page created by Leo Welch
 
CONTINUE READING
Conservation status of the dhole Cuon alpinus in
              north-east India, with a focus on Dampa Tiger
              Reserve, Mizoram
                                                            P R I Y A S I N G H , A R J U N S R I V A T H S A and D A V I D W . M A C D O N A L D

              Abstract Despite the efforts invested in their conservation,                           are a stronghold for the species (Acharya, ; Srivathsa
              the status of many threatened carnivores in key conserva-                              et al., ; Punjabi et al., ), with the largest dhole popu-
              tion landscapes remains unknown. The dhole Cuon alpinus                                lation (Kamler et al., ). However, the species has under-
              is an Endangered social carnivore whose geographical                                   gone local extirpation across parts of its former range as a
              range has contracted by c. % since the early th century.                           result of declines of prey species, loss of habitat and, poten-
              North-east India is a critical link between South Asian and                            tially, disease (Karanth et al., ; Srivathsa et al., ).
              South-east Asian dhole populations. In this study we com-                              Information on dholes in north-east India in particular is
              piled presence records of dholes across north-east India,                              limited (Gopi et al., ; Bashir et al., ; Lyngdoh
              from multiple sources. We also conducted camera-trap                                   et al., ), despite the fact that this landscape shares con-
              surveys in one part of this region, Dampa Tiger Reserve                                tinuous forest with Myanmar and South-east Asia, forming
              in the state of Mizoram. We examined the influence of                                  an important part of the species' global range.
              ecological and management factors on fine-scale site-use                                   Current knowledge of dholes in north-east India is
              by dholes in Dampa Tiger Reserve, showing a positive                                   restricted to landscapes north of the River Brahmaputra
              association of dhole site-use with sambar Rusa unicolor                                (Ginsberg & Macdonald, ). This is primarily because
              encounters, distance to the forest boundary and presence                               of the paucity of baseline ecological data from the region,
              of forest department personnel, underscoring the import-                               given its undulating terrain, difficulty of access, wet climatic
              ance of prey and protection. Our findings also highlight                               conditions, and socio-political insurgencies. Here we pro-
              the need for targeted, multi-scale assessments of dhole                                vide a compilation of dhole presence records from across
              ecology across other sites in north-east India.                                        north-east India using data extracted from multiple sources.
                                                                                                     Using data from camera-trap surveys we examine factors
              Keywords Camera traps, Cuon alpinus, distribution, dhole,
                                                                                                     influencing fine-scale site-use by dholes in Dampa Tiger
              Endangered, management, north-east India
                                                                                                     Reserve, Mizoram State. We discuss the implications of
              Supplementary material for this article is available at                                our results for dhole conservation in north-east India,
              https://doi.org/./S                                              where the focus of wildlife managers is directed mainly
                                                                                                     towards population recoveries of and local recolonization
                                                                                                     by the tiger Panthera tigris. We provide recommendations

              T    he dhole Cuon alpinus is an Endangered social carni-
                   vore found in forested landscapes of South and
              South-east Asia. Historically widespread across Asia, the
                                                                                                     for management interventions that could facilitate conser-
                                                                                                     vation of dholes in this hitherto neglected landscape.
                                                                                                         Dampa Tiger Reserve lies in the Indo-Myanmar Bio-
              species’ range has contracted by c. % (Wolf & Ripple,                                diversity Hotspot (Mittermeier et al., ; Fig. ). The
              ). The current distribution extends across most of                                 reserve is contiguous with the Chittagong Hill Tract region
              South and South-east Asia and parts of China but is largely                            of Bangladesh to the west. The core area of the Reserve cov-
              restricted to protected areas (Kamler et al., ). The pro-                          ers  km, and the multi-use buffer covers an area of
              tected forest landscapes south of the River Ganges in India                             km. The Lushai Hills traverse the reserve, with altitudes
                                                                                                     of –, m. Mean annual rainfall is ,–, mm
                                                                                                     (Islam & Rahmani, ). The Reserve supports a high di-
              PRIYA SINGH Researchers for Wildlife Conservation, National Centre for                 versity of carnivores, including, in addition to the dhole,
              Biological Sciences, GKVK Campus, Bengaluru, India                                     four species of felids and two species of ursids (Singh &
              ARJUN SRIVATHSA* (Corresponding author,     orcid.org/0000-0003-2935-3857)             Macdonald, ). In this study we also recorded the ele-
              Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida,                phant Elephas maximus, gaur Bos gaurus, sambar Rusa uni-
              Gainesville, USA. E-mail asrivathsa@ufl.edu
                                                                                                     color, red serow Capricornis rubidus, muntjac Muntiacus
              DAVID W. MACDONALD Department of Zoology, Wildlife Conservation Research
                                                                                                     muntjak and wild pig Sus scrofa.
              Unit, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, University of Oxford, Tubney, Abingdon, UK
                                                                                                         We compiled dhole presence records for nine north-
              *Also at: School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida,
              Gainesville, USA, and Wildlife Conservation Society–India, Bengaluru, India            eastern states (Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur,
              Received  September . Revision requested  November .
                                                                                                     Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura and
              Accepted  February . First published online  October .                     West Bengal). We searched for records from  onwards

              Oryx, 2020, 54(6), 873–877 © 2019 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319000255
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 04 Mar 2022 at 01:18:41, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605319000255
874         P. Singh et al.

                                                                                                                                    FIG. 1 North-east India, with Dampa
                                                                                                                                    Tiger Reserve in Mizoram and locations
                                                                                                                                    where the dhole Cuon alpinus has been
                                                                                                                                    recorded, with corresponding reliability
                                                                                                                                    scores (see text for details).

                in newspaper reports, scientific articles, grey literature (in-                        matrix therefore contained non-detections and detections
                cluding species checklists), and reports by forest department                          (coded as  and , respectively) for  sites (data from five
                personnel, local informants and naturalists working in the                             sites could not be retrieved), with a varying number of
                region. For each record we noted the type of evidence                                  temporal replicates (– days).
                (direct/indirect), date of sighting, administrative status of                              We used photo-capture frequencies of key prey species
                location (protected/non-protected), and source person or                               (sambar n = , muntjac n = , wild pig n = ; predicted
                reference. We assigned reliability scores for each record                              positive influence), distance to reserve boundary (predicted
                (–; with  being most reliable, and  least reliable;                                positive influence), photo-capture frequencies of forest
                Supplementary Table ).                                                                department personnel (predicted positive influence) and
                   From December  to March , we deployed                                     photo-capture frequencies of other humans (predicted
                pairs of Cuddeback Ambush IR camera traps (Model ;                                 negative influence) as factors likely to influence site-use by
                Cuddeback, De Pere, USA) across  km in the north-east                               dholes. We used trap effort (number of days a trap station
                of Dampa Tiger Reserve’s core area. At each station we                                 was active) at each site as a covariate for detection probabil-
                placed two cameras facing each other, c.  cm above the                               ity, predicting that higher effort would translate to higher
                ground, on either side of forest trails or on riverbeds                                detectability. We tested singular and additive effects of
                (Singh & Macdonald, ). Mean inter-trap distance was                                the covariates, in which each represented an ecologically
                . ± SD . km, with traps remaining active for an average                          plausible hypothesis. Covariates were checked for cross-
                of  days (range –; Singh & Macdonald, ). Although                             correlations and z-transformed prior to analyses. Models
                the stations were intended to photograph wild felids, they                             were ranked using Akaike information criterion corrected
                also photographed other carnivores. Dholes generally use                               for small sample sizes (AICc; Burnham & Anderson, ).
                forest trails and riverbeds for movement, marking territories                          Parameter estimation and model comparisons were calcu-
                and hunting, and our sampling design therefore incorpo-                                lated with PRESENCE . (Hines, ).
                rated areas used by the species.                                                           We obtained presence records from  locations for
                   We examined site-use patterns through an occupancy ap-                              –, of which we considered  records from –
                proach that accounted for imperfect detection (MacKenzie                                with reliability scores of – (Supplementary Table ).
                et al., ). We treated each station as a site, and each                             In the case of multiple records for the same site, we consid-
                trap-day as an independent temporal replicate. During                                  ered the most recent record with the highest reliability
                exploratory analyses we calculated Moran’s I to check                                  score. Most records were from Arunachal Pradesh (n = )
                for spatial dependence of detections. Spatial dependence                               and Assam (n = ), with five records from Mizoram and
                dropped beyond . km, with , % of distance-pairs falling                            Nagaland, four from West Bengal, three from Meghalaya
                within the first distance class (Supplementary Fig. ). We                             and two from Sikkim. There were no recent records of
                considered this to be negligible with respect to the total                             dholes from Manipur and Tripura. A total of , camera
                number of trap stations and detections, and therefore                                  trap-days in Dampa Tiger Reserve generated  photo-
                treated each station as an independent site. The detection                             encounters of dholes, comprising  detections (one per

                                                                                           Oryx, 2020, 54(6), 873–877 © 2019 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319000255
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 04 Mar 2022 at 01:18:41, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605319000255
Dhole in north-east India               875

              TABLE 1 The  top-ranked models (based on AICc scores) and the intercept-only model [psi(.), p(.)] for the probability of site-use by dholes
              in Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram during December –March .

              Model1                                          AICc            ΔAICc            AICc weight             Model likelihood             Parameters            Deviance
              psi(sbr + fdp + bdy),p(eff)                     862.47           0               0.4041                  1                            6                     850.47
              psi(sbr + fdp),p(eff)                           863.24           0.77            0.2750                  0.6805                       5                     853.24
              psi(sbr + fdp + bdy + hum),p(eff)               863.98           1.51            0.1899                  0.4700                       7                     849.98
              psi(sbr),p(eff)                                 867.29           4.82            0.0363                  0.0898                       4                     859.29
              psi(sbr + bdy),p(eff)                           867.74           5.27            0.0290                  0.0717                       5                     857.74
              psi(sbr + pig),p(eff)                           868.28           5.81            0.0221                  0.0547                       5                     858.28
              psi(sbr + hum),p(eff)                           868.32           5.85            0.0217                  0.0537                       5                     858.32
              psi(sbr + pig + mjk),p(eff)                     870.24           7.77            0.0083                  0.0205                       6                     858.24
              psi(fdp + bdy),p(eff)                           870.74           8.27            0.0065                  0.0160                       5                     860.74
              psi(bdy),p(eff)                                 873.22          10.75            0.0019                  0.0046                       4                     865.22
              psi(fdp),p(eff)                                 873.55          11.08            0.0016                  0.0039                       4                     865.55
              psi(.),p(.)                                     874.19          11.72            0.0012                  0.0029                       2                     870.19
              
              sbr, sambar encounter frequency; fdp, encounters of forest department personnel; bdy, distance to reserve boundary; eff, trap effort; hum, human activity;
              pig, wild pig encounter frequency; mjk, muntjac encounter frequency.

                                                                                                        There are records of dholes across several areas of
                                                                                                     north-east India, including in unprotected areas. Previous
                                                                                                     global assessments indicated that the species faced near
                                                                                                     or complete local extirpation to the south of the River
                                                                                                     Brahmaputra (Ginsberg & Macdonald, ), contrary to
                                                                                                     our findings from Dampa Tiger Reserve. Corroborating cur-
                                                                                                     rent knowledge from other landscapes, we found a positive
                                                                                                     relationship between dhole site-use and sambar presence
                                                                                                     (Acharya, ; Andheria et al., ; Punjabi et al., ).
                                                                                                     Across their extant distribution, the range of dholes overlaps
                                                                                                     with that of tigers and leopards Panthera pardus. Wildlife
                                                                                                     managers in this region and elsewhere subscribe to unsub-
              FIG. 2 Estimates of probabilities of site-use (psi) by dholes in                       stantiated notions that dhole presence impedes colonization
              Dampa Tiger Reserve (Fig. ) during December –March                                by tigers (P. Singh, pers. comm.), and consequently treat
              , based on camera-trap surveys and occupancy modelling.                            dholes as a problem species. On the contrary, tigers,
                                                                                                     leopards and dholes can exist provided protected areas
               hour duration) across  sites. Using the top-ranked                                support adequate densities of medium- to large-sized prey
              occupancy model (Table ), we estimated mean site-use                                  species (Karanth et al., ).
              probability to be psi = . ± SE . (Fig. ) and trap-level                            Dampa Tiger Reserve is an important refuge for dholes
              detectability to be P = . ± SE .. The top three models                           in north-east India. It supports large tracts of inviolate pro-
              received similar support based on AICc scores; we interpret                            tected spaces, and habitat connectivity with forested land-
              the covariate effects on probability of site-use from these                            scapes of the Chittagong Hill Tract region to the west,
              models. Sambar encounters, forest department personnel                                 Mamit Forest Division to the north and Thorangtlang
              encounters and distance to reserve boundary had positive                               Wildlife Sanctuary to the south. Our camera-trap data
              effects on probability of site-use by dholes (Table ,                                 indicate the presence of a guild of large herbivores in
              Fig. ). The slope coefficient associated with effort as a                             the Reserve, with at least five prey species of medium
              covariate for detectability was positive (mean = . ± SE .).                       and large ungulate herbivores, facilitating the long-term

              TABLE 2 Slope coefficient estimates ± SE for ecological and management covariates for the top three models (i.e. those with AICc scores , ;
              Table ) influencing site-use by dholes in Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram during December –March .

              Model1                                                    sbr                             fdp                           bdy                             hum
              psi(sbr + fdp + bdy),p(eff)                               1.35 ± 0.59                     0.86 ± 0.45                   0.54 ± 0.34
              psi(sbr + fdp),p(eff)                                     1.36 ± 0.55                     0.76 ± 0.42
              psi(sbr + fdp + bdy + hum),p(eff)                         1.29 ± 0.58                     1.12 ± 0.72                   0.51 ± 0.34                     −0.54 ± 0.84
              
               sbr, sambar encounter frequency; fdp, encounters of forest department personnel; bdy, distance to reserve boundary; hum, human activity.

              Oryx, 2020, 54(6), 873–877 © 2019 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319000255
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 04 Mar 2022 at 01:18:41, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605319000255
876         P. Singh et al.

                                                                                                                                        FIG. 3 The effect of (a) sambar Rusa
                                                                                                                                        unicolor encounter frequency, (b) forest
                                                                                                                                        department staff encounter frequency,
                                                                                                                                        (c) distance to reserve boundary, and
                                                                                                                                        (d) other human encounter frequency on
                                                                                                                                        the probability of site-use by dholes in
                                                                                                                                        Dampa Tiger Reserve during December
                                                                                                                                        –March . Grey lines indicate %
                                                                                                                                        confidence intervals.

                persistence of dholes there. Our findings re-emphasize the                             Ethical standards This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on
                importance of protected areas, which can serve as source                               ethical standards. Data on presence records were obtained from
                                                                                                       published literature, media reports, and a network of researchers and
                sites for sustaining dhole populations across the region.
                                                                                                       naturalists who agreed to share information. All necessary research
                    In areas with low prey densities, carnivores may have                              permits for camera-trap surveys were obtained from the State Forest
                significant dependence on livestock (Khorozyan et al.,                                 Department of Mizoram.
                ), and are consequently stigmatized. There is a strong
                negative relationship between dholes and livestock owners                              References
                in Arunachal Pradesh (Mishra et al., ; Lyngdoh et al.,
                ) and other locations in the region. Given that dholes                             A C H A R Y A , B.B. () The ecology of the dhole or Asiatic wild dog
                also occur outside protected areas in this region, they are po-                             (Cuon alpinus) in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh. PhD thesis.
                                                                                                            Saurashtra University, Rajkot, India.
                tentially vulnerable to retributory killing. Negative interac-
                                                                                                       A N D H E R I A , A.P., K A R A N T H , K.U. & K U M A R , N.S. () Diet and prey
                tions between people and dholes necessitate interventions to                                profiles of three sympatric large carnivores in Bandipur Tiger
                reduce poaching and facilitate recovery of prey, especially                                 Reserve, India. Journal of Zoology, , –.
                for species such as sambar that are impacted by low recovery                           B A S H I R , T., B H AT TAC H A R YA , T., P O U DYA L , K., R O Y , M. &
                rates following prolonged poaching (Steinmetz et al., ).                                S A T H Y A K U M A R , S. () Precarious status of the Endangered dhole
                                                                                                            Cuon alpinus in the high elevation Eastern Himalayan habitats of
                Our findings need to be augmented with a systematic survey
                                                                                                            Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve, Sikkim, India. Oryx, , –.
                across the locations we identified, specifically in the states of                      B U R N H A M , K.P. & A N D E R S O N , D.R. () Model Selection and
                Mizoram and Nagaland, to facilitate a pan-north-east India                                  Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information Theoretic Approach.
                strategy for dhole conservation.                                                            nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
                                                                                                       G I N S B E R G , J.R. & M AC D O N A L D , D.W. () Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and
                Acknowledgements We thank Pu Liandawla for granting us                                      Dogs: an Action Plan for the Conservation of Canids. IUCN/Species
                permission to work in Dampa Tiger Reserve, Pu Laltlanhlua and                               Survival Commission Canid Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland.
                Pu Lalrinmawia for administrative and logistic support, Nandita                        G O P I , G.V., L Y N G D O H , S. & S E LVA N , K.M. () Conserving the
                Hazarika, Ecosystem-India, and Alexandra Zimmerman, WildCRU                                 Endangered Asiatic Wild Dog Cuon alpinus in Western Arunachal
                and Chester Zoo, for coordinating and administering this study,                             Pradesh: Fostering Better Coexistence for Conservation. Final
                Assistant Conservator of Forest Pu Vanlalrema, Range Officer Pu                             Technical Report submitted to Rufford Small Grants Programme,
                Vanlalbera, D. Barman, K. Lalthanpuia and others for field support,                         London UK.
                the Robertson Foundation for a grant to DWM for funding the camera-                    H I N E S , J.E. () PRESENCE- Software to Estimate Patch Occupancy
                trap study, and the Editor and two anonymous reviewers for feedback.                        and Related Parameters. USGS-PWRC. Http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.
                AS was supported by the University of Florida, Wildlife Conservation                        gov/software/presence.html [accessed  August ].
                Society’s Christensen Conservation Leaders Scholarship, and Wildlife                   I S L A M , M.Z. & R A H M A N I , A.R. () Important Bird Areas in India:
                Conservation Network’s Sidney Byers Fellowship.                                             Priority Sites for Conservation. Bombay Natural History Society,
                                                                                                            Mumbai, India, and BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
                Author contributions Conception: PS, AS, DWM; data collection:                         K A M L E R , J.F., S O N G S A S E N , N., J E N K S , K., S R I VAT H S A , A., S H E N G , L. &
                PS; data analysis: PS, AS; writing: all authors, lead by PS.                                K U N K E L , K. () Cuon alpinus. In The IUCN Red List of
                                                                                                            Threatened Species . Http://dx.doi.org/./IUCN.UK.-
                Conflicts of interest None.                                                                 .RLTS.TA.en [accessed  August ].

                                                                                           Oryx, 2020, 54(6), 873–877 © 2019 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319000255
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 04 Mar 2022 at 01:18:41, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605319000255
Dhole in north-east India                  877

              K A R A N T H , K.K., N I C H O L S , J.D., K A R A N T H , K.U., H I N E S , J.E. &                    International Snow Leopard Trust, and Wildlife Conservation
                 C H R I S T E N S E N , N.L. () The shrinking ark: patterns of large                             Society (India Program), Mysore, India.
                 mammal extinctions in India. Proceedings of the Royal Society                                    M I T T E R M E I E R , R.A., R O B L E S -G I L , R., H O F F M A N , M., P I L G R I M , J.,
                 Biological Sciences, , –.                                                                 B R O O K S , T., M I T T E R M E I E R , C.G. et al. () Hotspots Revisited:
              K A R A N T H , K.U., S R I VAT H S A , A., V A S U D E V , D., P U R I , M.,                           Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial
                 P A R A M E S H WA R A N , R. & K U M A R , N.S. () Spatio-temporal                              Ecoregions. CEMEX, Mexico City, Mexico.
                 interactions facilitate large carnivore sympatry across a                                        P U N J A B I , G.A., E D G AO N K A R , A., S R I VAT H S A , A., A S H T A P U T R E , S. &
                 resource gradient. Proceedings of the Royal Society B:                                               R A O , M.K. () Distribution of the dhole in its northern range
                 Biological Sciences, , .                                                                  limits in the Western Ghats, India. Canid Biology and Conservation,
              K H O R O Z Y A N , I., G H O D D O U S I , A., S O O F I , M. & W A LT E R T , M. ()               , –.
                 Big cats kill more livestock when prey reaches a minimum threshold.                              S I N G H , P. & M AC D O N A L D , D.W. () Population and activity
                 Biological Conservation, , –.                                                               patterns of clouded leopards and marbled cats in Dampa Tiger
              L Y N G D O H , S., G O P I , G.V., S E LVA N , K.M. & H A B I B , B. () Effect of                  Reserve, India. Journal of Mammalogy, , –.
                 interactions among ethnic communities, livestock and wild dogs                                   S R I VAT H S A , A., K A R A N T H , K.K., J AT H A N N A , D., K U M A R , N.S. &
                 (Cuon alpinus) in Arunachal Pradesh, India. European Journal of                                      K A R A N T H , K.U. () On a dhole trail: examining ecological and
                 Wildlife Research, , –.                                                                      anthropogenic correlates of dhole habitat occupancy in the Western
              M AC K E N Z I E , D.I., N I C H O L S , J.D., L AC H M A N , G.B., D R O E G E , S., R O Y L E ,       Ghats of India. PLOS ONE, , e.
                 J.A. & L A N G T I M M , C.A. () Estimating site occupancy                                   S T E I N M E T Z , R., C H U T I P O N G , W., S E U AT U R I E N , N., C H I R N G S A A R D , E.
                 rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology,                                       & K H A E N G K H E T K A R N , M. () Population recovery patterns of
                 , –.                                                                                       Southeast Asian ungulates after poaching. Biological Conservation,
              M I S H R A , C., D AT T A , A. & M A D H U S U D A N , M.D. () The High                            , –.
                 Altitude Wildlife of Western Arunachal Pradesh: a Survey Report.                                 W O L F , C. & R I P P L E , W.J. () Range contractions of the world’s
                 Unpublished Report. Nature Conservation Foundation,                                                  large carnivores. Royal Society Open Science, , .

              Oryx, 2020, 54(6), 873–877 © 2019 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605319000255
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 04 Mar 2022 at 01:18:41, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605319000255
You can also read